First question. Over or under ONE YEAR before NBCU shows are back on Apple's iTunes?
Robert: UNDER! NBC Universal has a problem. The way it is set up I believe they will ONLY be able to sell well digitally if someone actually wants to watch it on the iPod! Otherwise, they'll go to NBC's site looking to see where they can buy Heroes and one of two things will happen:
1. $4.99? WTF!?
2. Even if it's $1.99 - HEY! they archive all the shows here during the season! I'll just watch it FOR FREE (there are ads, but only a few with what any of them are currently doing. It adds about 2 minutes instead of 20 you'd see on TV). Under, definitely under.
Bill: OVER! You're insane to think that the executives making these decisions at NBCU are sane, rational people trying to figure out how to make the most money and act in their own self-interests.. It's all about ego, and they can't handle that Steve Jobs is so, so fabulous and they're so, so not. Unless GE & Vivendi fire the dopes at NBCU who made this choice, I'm sticking with OVER.
Next question: Over/Under ONE HUNDRED TIMES that Les Moonves says "Only 45% of DVR users zap through the commercials" during the 2007-2008 season?
Robert: This is a ridiculous question. And a ridiculous statistic that's only true if you squint and ignore the actual data. I'd be prone to go over, even at ONE THOUSAND TIMES. More and more people will be moving to DVR usage and more and more advertisers will be upset about it. Moonves will constantly and consistently try to soothe them while still getting their greenbacks. OVER
Bill: Ahh, the pain and agony of having to agree with you. OVER. I have nothing else to add.
Next Question: Over/Under TEN: Number of this season's new shows that make it to next year's lineup?
Robert: If you include the CW in this mix, which we must because we here at TVbytheNumbers are a very inclusive bunch there are FORTY SIX new shows. I don't want to go over though because I think the number is exactly 10. So I'm going to push and say 10
Bill:is OVER/UNDER! We'll have to start changing these questions (e.g. 10.5) to force you into being a man and growing some stones. It's UNDER, it will be around 8 or 9 shows. But this is a dumb question to be asking now because Fox is holding back all their good stuff until January. I can't WAIT for The Sarah Connor Chronicles! Not to mention my favorites 24 and . No wait, I don't actually like either of those shows, I might give the Return of Jezebel James a try though. UNDER!
Robert: You know you can't wait for ABC's Cavemen! But when it comes to ABC I'm all about seeing my boy Mark Cuban winningand watching Denny Crane (Boston Legal).
I don't know that I'll watch ANY new show. I may even bail on 24, it sucked last year. They say it will be better this year, with a female president. Fortunately I don't have to worry about that until next year. I'm pretty set in my ways.
Bill: You will watch the Sarah Connor Chronicles and you know you're going to watch the Bionic Woman AT LEAST once.
Robert: I'm as likely to watch the Bionic Woman as I am to watch, which is never. I didn't like it in the ‘70's, I won't like it in '07.
Bill: Admit it, it's already on your Tivo...
Next Question..(p.s. Zap2it has good full coverage of all the lineups).
Over/Under: Seven Weeks that Mark Cuban Lasts on ""?
Robert: OVER, people are crazy if they don't think Cubes is advancing to the finals. I'd say he's going to win at all except for two words: Jane Seymour. C'mon, how am I going to bet against Jayne Seymour? But Mark will crush Marie Osmond and Scary Spice. You just wait!
Bill: Why do you make me suffer through your man-love for Cuban? Are you going to send him "good luck" flowers too? Cuban won't fare any better here than he did with the Benefactor (6 weeks!) UNDER, under, under, definitely under.
Robert: You're insane, but that's a great idea about the flowers! That's it for this week boys and girls...
(this is a complete mockup and may not accuately reflect the opinions of either of us, though that will always be true! The idea is also completely a ripoff of Tony Kornheiser's and Michael Wilbon's fine work on ESPN's).