<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Bigshot Strategy Blog Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vink</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-257543</link>
		<dc:creator>Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-257543</guid>
		<description>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vink</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-13725</link>
		<dc:creator>Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13725</guid>
		<description>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-13724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13724</guid>
		<description>Vink, We neither make nor enforce the rules of the game, we just write the strategy blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vink, We neither make nor enforce the rules of the game, we just write the strategy blog <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vink</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-301867</link>
		<dc:creator>Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301867</guid>
		<description>Barely got word of &quot;Women&#039;s Murder Club&quot; being canceled I couldn&#039;t dump it fast enough last week, yet this week people can still buy &quot;Scrubs&quot; and &quot;Biggest Loser&quot;. And &quot;WMC&quot; was on the rise until the very end. What kind of ship are you guys running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barely got word of &#8220;Women&#8217;s Murder Club&#8221; being canceled I couldn&#8217;t dump it fast enough last week, yet this week people can still buy &#8220;Scrubs&#8221; and &#8220;Biggest Loser&#8221;. And &#8220;WMC&#8221; was on the rise until the very end. What kind of ship are you guys running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vink</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-301868</link>
		<dc:creator>Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301868</guid>
		<description>Barely got word of &quot;Women&#039;s Murder Club&quot; being canceled I couldn&#039;t dump it fast enough last week, yet this week people can still buy &quot;Scrubs&quot; and &quot;Biggest Loser&quot;. And &quot;WMC&quot; was on the rise until the very end. What kind of ship are you guys running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barely got word of &#8220;Women&#8217;s Murder Club&#8221; being canceled I couldn&#8217;t dump it fast enough last week, yet this week people can still buy &#8220;Scrubs&#8221; and &#8220;Biggest Loser&#8221;. And &#8220;WMC&#8221; was on the rise until the very end. What kind of ship are you guys running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-301804</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301804</guid>
		<description>Hey, where&#039;s the late night show ratings category?  
I see Daytime Ratings, but I&#039;m not seeing Late Night.
I like to keep up with those.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, where&#8217;s the late night show ratings category?<br />
I see Daytime Ratings, but I&#8217;m not seeing Late Night.<br />
I like to keep up with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-7/#comment-13723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13723</guid>
		<description>RickNick, We hope they bring it back too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RickNick, We hope they bring it back too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickNick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-13722</link>
		<dc:creator>RickNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13722</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this was a great deal of fun. and ending up in the top 1.5 percent of the field was very satisfying. I would play again next year. I hope they bring it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this was a great deal of fun. and ending up in the top 1.5 percent of the field was very satisfying. I would play again next year. I hope they bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301628</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301628</guid>
		<description>The networks are out with their Fall 2008 schedules, forcing them to admit to cancellations of shows that aren&#039;t coming back:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The networks are out with their Fall 2008 schedules, forcing them to admit to cancellations of shows that aren&#8217;t coming back:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301627</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301627</guid>
		<description>The networks are out with their Fall 2008 schedules, forcing them to admit to cancellations of shows that aren&#039;t coming back:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The networks are out with their Fall 2008 schedules, forcing them to admit to cancellations of shows that aren&#8217;t coming back:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/fall-2008-schedule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name *</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301626</link>
		<dc:creator>Name *</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301626</guid>
		<description>Hoy! What&#039;s with all the sudden cancellations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoy! What&#8217;s with all the sudden cancellations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name *</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301625</link>
		<dc:creator>Name *</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301625</guid>
		<description>Hoy! What&#039;s with all the sudden cancellations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoy! What&#8217;s with all the sudden cancellations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301593</guid>
		<description>deadeye, the italics text I reprinted in the blog post came directly from a forum post by a TWoP Tech. Those folks run the game, I&#039;m just the strategy blogger.

Since TWoP/Bravo wants to crown the winner on June 1, and results for the week of May 25-31 are not available until June 2, that wouldn&#039;t be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deadeye, the italics text I reprinted in the blog post came directly from a forum post by a TWoP Tech. Those folks run the game, I&#8217;m just the strategy blogger.</p>
<p>Since TWoP/Bravo wants to crown the winner on June 1, and results for the week of May 25-31 are not available until June 2, that wouldn&#8217;t be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301594</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301594</guid>
		<description>deadeye, the italics text I reprinted in the blog post came directly from a forum post by a TWoP Tech. Those folks run the game, I&#039;m just the strategy blogger.

Since TWoP/Bravo wants to crown the winner on June 1, and results for the week of May 25-31 are not available until June 2, that wouldn&#039;t be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deadeye, the italics text I reprinted in the blog post came directly from a forum post by a TWoP Tech. Those folks run the game, I&#8217;m just the strategy blogger.</p>
<p>Since TWoP/Bravo wants to crown the winner on June 1, and results for the week of May 25-31 are not available until June 2, that wouldn&#8217;t be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadeye</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-13721</link>
		<dc:creator>deadeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13721</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight. Although the contest ends June 1st, shows that air May 25-31 do not count? Is this certain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight. Although the contest ends June 1st, shows that air May 25-31 do not count? Is this certain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301552</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301552</guid>
		<description>To answer my own post on Survivor, using the #s at this site, I averaged last Thurs., 5/8 with the finale (2 hrs.) and reunion from Sun., 5/11 and dividing by 3, the result is about 69 for a net loss of 7. I think that&#039;s how you get the #. Feel free to correct me.

Looks like almost everything is a loss of $ this week. I sold most of my shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer my own post on Survivor, using the #s at this site, I averaged last Thurs., 5/8 with the finale (2 hrs.) and reunion from Sun., 5/11 and dividing by 3, the result is about 69 for a net loss of 7. I think that&#8217;s how you get the #. Feel free to correct me.</p>
<p>Looks like almost everything is a loss of $ this week. I sold most of my shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-13720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13720</guid>
		<description>Thanks! You are correct, and I have edited the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! You are correct, and I have edited the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joslyn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301533</link>
		<dc:creator>Joslyn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301533</guid>
		<description>I think you have The Office reversed in your Blog post - it&#039;s priced at $47M right now and if my spreadsheet is right, going down to $46M tomorrow. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have The Office reversed in your Blog post &#8211; it&#8217;s priced at $47M right now and if my spreadsheet is right, going down to $46M tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301498</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301498</guid>
		<description>I was trying to decide all weekend whether or not to keep Survivor, hoping there would be an increase in money for it before the Wed. update. I kept it anyway instead of buying another show or two. Not sure if that&#039;s going to happen or not, as I&#039;m not sure how TVBS will average it all. Does anyone have an idea how they&#039;ll get the # from last Thurs.&#039;s show plus the 2 hour finale and 1 hr. reunion from Sunday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to decide all weekend whether or not to keep Survivor, hoping there would be an increase in money for it before the Wed. update. I kept it anyway instead of buying another show or two. Not sure if that&#8217;s going to happen or not, as I&#8217;m not sure how TVBS will average it all. Does anyone have an idea how they&#8217;ll get the # from last Thurs.&#8217;s show plus the 2 hour finale and 1 hr. reunion from Sunday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13719</guid>
		<description>NN, I did read your earlier comments, thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the heads up on the ER and Supernatural finales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, I did read your earlier comments, thanks.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on the ER and Supernatural finales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301477</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301477</guid>
		<description>Supernatural also has a season finale, but my comment for ER also applies here (Even if it is my favorite show right now). Sorry for the double post, I couldn&#039;t figure out how to edit the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supernatural also has a season finale, but my comment for ER also applies here (Even if it is my favorite show right now). Sorry for the double post, I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to edit the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301476</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301476</guid>
		<description>Bill:
Too bad about our old comments. I hope you got my thank you about explaining the &quot;magic&quot; Grey&#039;s Anatomy that won the top 5 without winning its time slot before they went kaput.

My comment this time is I believe that ER also has a season finale this week if I&#039;m not mistaken. Probably not important anyway as I might be one of a handful of people left who still watches it (tapes it actually as I watch LOST or vice versa). No killer helicopter, but there will be an exploding ambulance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
Too bad about our old comments. I hope you got my thank you about explaining the &#8220;magic&#8221; Grey&#8217;s Anatomy that won the top 5 without winning its time slot before they went kaput.</p>
<p>My comment this time is I believe that ER also has a season finale this week if I&#8217;m not mistaken. Probably not important anyway as I might be one of a handful of people left who still watches it (tapes it actually as I watch LOST or vice versa). No killer helicopter, but there will be an exploding ambulance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301459</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301459</guid>
		<description>Marc, you found it. We lost some older comments when we made the switch to our new comments system, but going forward we&#039;re all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, you found it. We lost some older comments when we made the switch to our new comments system, but going forward we&#8217;re all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-301458</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-301458</guid>
		<description>just trying to figure out where these posts got to now...haven&#039;t been able to find the discussion...this is a test ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just trying to figure out where these posts got to now&#8230;haven&#8217;t been able to find the discussion&#8230;this is a test <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#039;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#039;s better performers, but Grey&#039;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.

When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#039;d say they&#039;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#039;s overrun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#8217;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#8217;s better performers, but Grey&#8217;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.</p>
<p>When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#8217;s overrun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-306727</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306727</guid>
		<description>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#039;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#039;s better performers, but Grey&#039;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.

When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#039;d say they&#039;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#039;s overrun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#8217;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#8217;s better performers, but Grey&#8217;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.</p>
<p>When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#8217;s overrun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-11732</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11732</guid>
		<description>Bill:
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#039;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next - otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#039;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#039;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.

Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff - especially since in the Grey&#039;s case, I&#039;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#8217;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next &#8211; otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#8217;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#8217;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.</p>
<p>Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff &#8211; especially since in the Grey&#8217;s case, I&#8217;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-306726</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306726</guid>
		<description>Bill:
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#039;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next - otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#039;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#039;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.

Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff - especially since in the Grey&#039;s case, I&#039;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#8217;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next &#8211; otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#8217;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#8217;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.</p>
<p>Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff &#8211; especially since in the Grey&#8217;s case, I&#8217;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-11606</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11606</guid>
		<description>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#039;s the situation.

Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.

For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#039;s 10.65.

However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#039;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#039;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.

The overrun did boost Grey&#039;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#039;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#8217;s the situation.</p>
<p>Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.</p>
<p>For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#8217;s 10.65.</p>
<p>However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#8217;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#8217;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.</p>
<p>The overrun did boost Grey&#8217;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#8217;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-306728</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306728</guid>
		<description>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#039;s the situation.

Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.

For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#039;s 10.65.

However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#039;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#039;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.

The overrun did boost Grey&#039;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#039;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#8217;s the situation.</p>
<p>Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.</p>
<p>For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#8217;s 10.65.</p>
<p>However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#8217;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#8217;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.</p>
<p>The overrun did boost Grey&#8217;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#8217;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#039;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#039;ll make sure things get corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#8217;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#8217;ll make sure things get corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-306730</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306730</guid>
		<description>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#039;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#039;ll make sure things get corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#8217;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#8217;ll make sure things get corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-11569</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11569</guid>
		<description>Hello Bill: 
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.

Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#039;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#039;t watch either - ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#039;t have won the 9 o&#039;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#039;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#039;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#039;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#039;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research - though in the end I&#039;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#039;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bill:<br />
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.</p>
<p>Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#8217;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#8217;t watch either &#8211; ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#8217;t have won the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#8217;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#8217;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#8217;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research &#8211; though in the end I&#8217;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#8217;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-6/#comment-306729</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306729</guid>
		<description>Hello Bill: 
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.

Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#039;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#039;t watch either - ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#039;t have won the 9 o&#039;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#039;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#039;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#039;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#039;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research - though in the end I&#039;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#039;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bill:<br />
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.</p>
<p>Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#8217;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#8217;t watch either &#8211; ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#8217;t have won the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#8217;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#8217;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#8217;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research &#8211; though in the end I&#8217;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#8217;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-11150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11150</guid>
		<description>Mr. SFTV -

The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#039;s a little more work, but that&#039;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).

p.s. I&#039;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. SFTV -</p>
<p>The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#8217;s a little more work, but that&#8217;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).</p>
<p>p.s. I&#8217;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306724</guid>
		<description>Mr. SFTV -

The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#039;s a little more work, but that&#039;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).

p.s. I&#039;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. SFTV -</p>
<p>The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#8217;s a little more work, but that&#8217;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).</p>
<p>p.s. I&#8217;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#039;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &quot;household rating&quot;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#039;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.

While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#039;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#8217;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &#8220;household rating&#8221;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#8217;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.</p>
<p>While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#8217;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306723</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306723</guid>
		<description>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#039;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &quot;household rating&quot;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#039;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.

While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#039;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#8217;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &#8220;household rating&#8221;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#8217;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.</p>
<p>While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#8217;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joslyn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator>Joslyn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11131</guid>
		<description>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc - how is Grey&#039;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#039;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#039;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc &#8211; how is Grey&#8217;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#8217;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#8217;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joslyn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306725</link>
		<dc:creator>Joslyn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306725</guid>
		<description>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc - how is Grey&#039;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#039;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#039;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc &#8211; how is Grey&#8217;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#8217;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#8217;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>Ike, I think I &lt;s&gt;may&lt;/s&gt; might just block your ability to comment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike, I think I <s>may</s> might just block your ability to comment <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306722</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306722</guid>
		<description>Ike, I think I may might just block your ability to comment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike, I think I may might just block your ability to comment <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-10832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10832</guid>
		<description>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&quot;  It should be &quot;Law &amp; Order did....&quot;  Or &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s new episode did....&quot;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&#8221;  It should be &#8220;Law &amp; Order did&#8230;.&#8221;  Or &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s new episode did&#8230;.&#8221;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306721</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306721</guid>
		<description>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&quot;  It should be &quot;Law &amp; Order did....&quot;  Or &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s new episode did....&quot;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&#8221;  It should be &#8220;Law &amp; Order did&#8230;.&#8221;  Or &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s new episode did&#8230;.&#8221;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306720</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretzelgirl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-10537</link>
		<dc:creator>pretzelgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10537</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#039;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.
pretzelgirl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,<br />
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#8217;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.<br />
pretzelgirl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretzelgirl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306719</link>
		<dc:creator>pretzelgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306719</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#039;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.
pretzelgirl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,<br />
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#8217;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.<br />
pretzelgirl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. SFTV</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-10476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. SFTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10476</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.

However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &quot;next air dates&quot; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.

Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &quot;next air date&quot;.  That&#039;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#039;t seem to be able to resolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.</p>
<p>However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &#8220;next air dates&#8221; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.</p>
<p>Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &#8220;next air date&#8221;.  That&#8217;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#8217;t seem to be able to resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. SFTV</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/comment-page-5/#comment-306718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. SFTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-306718</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.

However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &quot;next air dates&quot; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.

Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &quot;next air date&quot;.  That&#039;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#039;t seem to be able to resolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.</p>
<p>However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &#8220;next air dates&#8221; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.</p>
<p>Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &#8220;next air date&#8221;.  That&#8217;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#8217;t seem to be able to resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

