<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#039;Reilly vs. Olbermann Through Thursday, February 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI....Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#039;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI&#8230;.Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#8217;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15286</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15286</guid>
		<description>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI....Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#039;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI&#8230;.Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#39;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooper</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#039;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.

I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#8217;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.</p>
<p>I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooper</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15285</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#039;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#39;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.</p>
<p>I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS....very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &quot;EAT SHIT&quot;

Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#039;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.
  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. 

1. Tucker Carlson - Fired
2. Joe Scarborough - Becoming more Hollywood every day
3 Pat Buchanan - Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  

I see Air America&#039;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right......Feminist Lesbians we&#039;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?

Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#039;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS&#8230;.very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &#8220;EAT SHIT&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#8217;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.<br />
  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. </p>
<p>1. Tucker Carlson &#8211; Fired<br />
2. Joe Scarborough &#8211; Becoming more Hollywood every day<br />
3 Pat Buchanan &#8211; Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  </p>
<p>I see Air America&#8217;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right&#8230;&#8230;Feminist Lesbians we&#8217;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?</p>
<p>Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#8217;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS....very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &quot;EAT SHIT&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#039;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.&lt;br&gt;  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Tucker Carlson - Fired&lt;br&gt;2. Joe Scarborough - Becoming more Hollywood every day&lt;br&gt;3 Pat Buchanan - Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see Air America&#039;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right......Feminist Lesbians we&#039;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#039;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS&#8230;.very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &#8220;EAT SHIT&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#39;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.<br />  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. </p>
<p>1. Tucker Carlson &#8211; Fired<br />2. Joe Scarborough &#8211; Becoming more Hollywood every day<br />3 Pat Buchanan &#8211; Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  </p>
<p>I see Air America&#39;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right&#8230;&#8230;Feminist Lesbians we&#39;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?</p>
<p>Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#39;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6417</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6417</guid>
		<description>O&#039;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV...WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV...EAT SHIT....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV&#8230;WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV&#8230;EAT SHIT&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15283</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15283</guid>
		<description>O&#039;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV...WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV...EAT SHIT....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#39;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV&#8230;WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV&#8230;EAT SHIT&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV...WHAT AN ASSHOLE...TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ...GET FUCKING REAL.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV&#8230;WHAT AN ASSHOLE&#8230;TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ&#8230;GET FUCKING REAL&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV...WHAT AN ASSHOLE...TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ...GET FUCKING REAL.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV&#8230;WHAT AN ASSHOLE&#8230;TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ&#8230;GET FUCKING REAL&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakesavage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6116</link>
		<dc:creator>snakesavage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6116</guid>
		<description>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#039;s-- all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#8242;s&#8211; all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakesavage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15281</link>
		<dc:creator>snakesavage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15281</guid>
		<description>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#039;s-- all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#39;s&#8211; all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loran K</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>Loran K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.

Recently O&#039;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  

Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.

Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.
For Hillary it was basically 50-50.

And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#039;Reilly are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.</p>
<p>Recently O&#8217;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  </p>
<p>Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.</p>
<p>Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.<br />
For Hillary it was basically 50-50.</p>
<p>And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#8217;Reilly are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loran K</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15280</link>
		<dc:creator>Loran K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15280</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recently O&#039;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.&lt;br&gt;For Hillary it was basically 50-50.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#039;Reilly are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.</p>
<p>Recently O&#39;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  </p>
<p>Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.</p>
<p>Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.<br />For Hillary it was basically 50-50.</p>
<p>And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#39;Reilly are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rock</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6102</guid>
		<description>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &quot;trolls&quot; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.

People....don&#039;t be so EASY!

When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.

Here, let me give you an example.....

Billo&#039;s rating don&#039;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!

See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#039;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! 
All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted...have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.

We should all be SO proud! 

If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &quot;NOT Great American&quot;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.

If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!

:-i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &#8220;trolls&#8221; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.</p>
<p>People&#8230;.don&#8217;t be so EASY!</p>
<p>When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.</p>
<p>Here, let me give you an example&#8230;..</p>
<p>Billo&#8217;s rating don&#8217;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!</p>
<p>See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#8217;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest!<br />
All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted&#8230;have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.</p>
<p>We should all be SO proud! </p>
<p>If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &#8220;NOT Great American&#8221;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.</p>
<p>If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!</p>
<p>:-i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rock</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15279</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15279</guid>
		<description>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &quot;trolls&quot; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People....don&#039;t be so EASY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here, let me give you an example.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Billo&#039;s rating don&#039;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#039;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! &lt;br&gt;All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted...have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We should all be SO proud! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &quot;NOT Great American&quot;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &#8220;trolls&#8221; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.</p>
<p>People&#8230;.don&#39;t be so EASY!</p>
<p>When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.</p>
<p>Here, let me give you an example&#8230;..</p>
<p>Billo&#39;s rating don&#39;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!</p>
<p>See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#39;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! <br />All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted&#8230;have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.</p>
<p>We should all be SO proud! </p>
<p>If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &#8220;NOT Great American&#8221;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.</p>
<p>If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!</p>
<p>:-i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>kay s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>marty , 
Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marty ,<br />
Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-3/#comment-15278</link>
		<dc:creator>kay s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15278</guid>
		<description>marty , &lt;br&gt;Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marty , <br />Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perez Hilton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Perez Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>John Stewart can hand everyone&#039;s asses to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Stewart can hand everyone&#8217;s asses to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perez Hilton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15277</link>
		<dc:creator>Perez Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15277</guid>
		<description>John Stewart can hand everyone&#039;s asses to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Stewart can hand everyone&#39;s asses to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15276</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15276</guid>
		<description>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-6080</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6080</guid>
		<description>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15275</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15275</guid>
		<description>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tronsgard</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tronsgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.  
They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.<br />
They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tronsgard</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15274</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tronsgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15274</guid>
		<description>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.  &lt;br&gt;They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.  <br />They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeanOrff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-6064</link>
		<dc:creator>DeanOrff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6064</guid>
		<description>ED, you gotta be kidding me !
Olbermann&#039;s &quot;views are no different&quot; than all the other networks ???!!  Do you WATCH any of the other networks? NOBODY says the things that Keith Olbermann says on his show. NO OTHER news guy with his own show says what Olbermann says because Keith is allowed to state his opinion like the guys on Fox do -- but the other network announcers at CNN, ABC, etc.are not allowed to do that. 

It&#039;s a tragedy that people think the media have a liberal bias just cause conservative propagandists keep screaming that they do. I have dozens of newspaper articles from regular daily papers like the USA Today, Associated Press articles from large and small newspapers across the country that PROVE that TV news has NEVER TOLD US THE TRUTH About:
1)2000 Election
2)the Enron scandal and 2001-04 Recession
3)Abu Ghraib prison scandal
4) Hurricane Katrina (CNN started to, then they cut off the live interview with the National Guard guy when he said something too shocking)
5) Iraq War and U.S.-proposed Oil-Sharing Law

I&#039;m talking about actual facts printed over and over again and usually confirmed by records from the recent Republican congress and/or the Bush administration&#039;s own govt. statistics -- and this information is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN to most of the American people because the so-called &quot;liberal biased&quot; TV news won&#039;t report it.........They won&#039;t even use the word &quot;Filibuster&quot; (let alone explain what it means) when they talk about what Republicans have been doing in  Congress for the past year. I guess Filibuster is a Politically INcorrect word that would Offend Republicans. So hardly anyone knows that they broke the 2-year record for filibusters in less than one year.
Until the Democrats wise up and start attacking the media for having a pro-Republican bias, people will keep believing the Republican Bullcrap attacks on the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ED, you gotta be kidding me !<br />
Olbermann&#8217;s &#8220;views are no different&#8221; than all the other networks ???!!  Do you WATCH any of the other networks? NOBODY says the things that Keith Olbermann says on his show. NO OTHER news guy with his own show says what Olbermann says because Keith is allowed to state his opinion like the guys on Fox do &#8212; but the other network announcers at CNN, ABC, etc.are not allowed to do that. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tragedy that people think the media have a liberal bias just cause conservative propagandists keep screaming that they do. I have dozens of newspaper articles from regular daily papers like the USA Today, Associated Press articles from large and small newspapers across the country that PROVE that TV news has NEVER TOLD US THE TRUTH About:<br />
1)2000 Election<br />
2)the Enron scandal and 2001-04 Recession<br />
3)Abu Ghraib prison scandal<br />
4) Hurricane Katrina (CNN started to, then they cut off the live interview with the National Guard guy when he said something too shocking)<br />
5) Iraq War and U.S.-proposed Oil-Sharing Law</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about actual facts printed over and over again and usually confirmed by records from the recent Republican congress and/or the Bush administration&#8217;s own govt. statistics &#8212; and this information is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN to most of the American people because the so-called &#8220;liberal biased&#8221; TV news won&#8217;t report it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;They won&#8217;t even use the word &#8220;Filibuster&#8221; (let alone explain what it means) when they talk about what Republicans have been doing in  Congress for the past year. I guess Filibuster is a Politically INcorrect word that would Offend Republicans. So hardly anyone knows that they broke the 2-year record for filibusters in less than one year.<br />
Until the Democrats wise up and start attacking the media for having a pro-Republican bias, people will keep believing the Republican Bullcrap attacks on the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeanOrff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15273</link>
		<dc:creator>DeanOrff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15273</guid>
		<description>ED, you gotta be kidding me !&lt;br&gt;Olbermann&#039;s &quot;views are no different&quot; than all the other networks ???!!  Do you WATCH any of the other networks? NOBODY says the things that Keith Olbermann says on his show. NO OTHER news guy with his own show says what Olbermann says because Keith is allowed to state his opinion like the guys on Fox do -- but the other network announcers at CNN, ABC, etc.are not allowed to do that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a tragedy that people think the media have a liberal bias just cause conservative propagandists keep screaming that they do. I have dozens of newspaper articles from regular daily papers like the USA Today, Associated Press articles from large and small newspapers across the country that PROVE that TV news has NEVER TOLD US THE TRUTH About:&lt;br&gt;1)2000 Election&lt;br&gt;2)the Enron scandal and 2001-04 Recession&lt;br&gt;3)Abu Ghraib prison scandal&lt;br&gt;4) Hurricane Katrina (CNN started to, then they cut off the live interview with the National Guard guy when he said something too shocking)&lt;br&gt;5) Iraq War and U.S.-proposed Oil-Sharing Law&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m talking about actual facts printed over and over again and usually confirmed by records from the recent Republican congress and/or the Bush administration&#039;s own govt. statistics -- and this information is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN to most of the American people because the so-called &quot;liberal biased&quot; TV news won&#039;t report it.........They won&#039;t even use the word &quot;Filibuster&quot; (let alone explain what it means) when they talk about what Republicans have been doing in  Congress for the past year. I guess Filibuster is a Politically INcorrect word that would Offend Republicans. So hardly anyone knows that they broke the 2-year record for filibusters in less than one year.&lt;br&gt;Until the Democrats wise up and start attacking the media for having a pro-Republican bias, people will keep believing the Republican Bullcrap attacks on the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ED, you gotta be kidding me !<br />Olbermann&#39;s &#8220;views are no different&#8221; than all the other networks ???!!  Do you WATCH any of the other networks? NOBODY says the things that Keith Olbermann says on his show. NO OTHER news guy with his own show says what Olbermann says because Keith is allowed to state his opinion like the guys on Fox do &#8212; but the other network announcers at CNN, ABC, etc.are not allowed to do that. </p>
<p>It&#39;s a tragedy that people think the media have a liberal bias just cause conservative propagandists keep screaming that they do. I have dozens of newspaper articles from regular daily papers like the USA Today, Associated Press articles from large and small newspapers across the country that PROVE that TV news has NEVER TOLD US THE TRUTH About:<br />1)2000 Election<br />2)the Enron scandal and 2001-04 Recession<br />3)Abu Ghraib prison scandal<br />4) Hurricane Katrina (CNN started to, then they cut off the live interview with the National Guard guy when he said something too shocking)<br />5) Iraq War and U.S.-proposed Oil-Sharing Law</p>
<p>I&#39;m talking about actual facts printed over and over again and usually confirmed by records from the recent Republican congress and/or the Bush administration&#39;s own govt. statistics &#8212; and this information is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN to most of the American people because the so-called &#8220;liberal biased&#8221; TV news won&#39;t report it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;They won&#39;t even use the word &#8220;Filibuster&#8221; (let alone explain what it means) when they talk about what Republicans have been doing in  Congress for the past year. I guess Filibuster is a Politically INcorrect word that would Offend Republicans. So hardly anyone knows that they broke the 2-year record for filibusters in less than one year.<br />Until the Democrats wise up and start attacking the media for having a pro-Republican bias, people will keep believing the Republican Bullcrap attacks on the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Carter</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-5945</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5945</guid>
		<description>I watched Keith O. tonight (March 6th). Yeah, I know better, but my wife asked me how I knew FOX was better since I never watched any other channel. Since then, I occasionally tune to CNN and MSNBC just to make my point. Tonight, Keith O. Bragged about how Britt H.&#039;s show was the lowest ratted of the three. WOW, one time so it makes news on PMSNBC! That makes Keith O. &quot;The WORST, WORSTER AND WORSTEST IN THE WORLD&quot;! According to &#039;un-named sources&#039;, that is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Keith O. tonight (March 6th). Yeah, I know better, but my wife asked me how I knew FOX was better since I never watched any other channel. Since then, I occasionally tune to CNN and MSNBC just to make my point. Tonight, Keith O. Bragged about how Britt H.&#8217;s show was the lowest ratted of the three. WOW, one time so it makes news on PMSNBC! That makes Keith O. &#8220;The WORST, WORSTER AND WORSTEST IN THE WORLD&#8221;! According to &#8216;un-named sources&#8217;, that is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Carter</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15272</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15272</guid>
		<description>I watched Keith O. tonight (March 6th). Yeah, I know better, but my wife asked me how I knew FOX was better since I never watched any other channel. Since then, I occasionally tune to CNN and MSNBC just to make my point. Tonight, Keith O. Bragged about how Britt H.&#039;s show was the lowest ratted of the three. WOW, one time so it makes news on PMSNBC! That makes Keith O. &quot;The WORST, WORSTER AND WORSTEST IN THE WORLD&quot;! According to &#039;un-named sources&#039;, that is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Keith O. tonight (March 6th). Yeah, I know better, but my wife asked me how I knew FOX was better since I never watched any other channel. Since then, I occasionally tune to CNN and MSNBC just to make my point. Tonight, Keith O. Bragged about how Britt H.&#39;s show was the lowest ratted of the three. WOW, one time so it makes news on PMSNBC! That makes Keith O. &#8220;The WORST, WORSTER AND WORSTEST IN THE WORLD&#8221;! According to &#39;un-named sources&#39;, that is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>Jerry - You are saying that Keith O. is a negative asset which is beneficial to the GE conglomerate which needs unprofitable intiities
for write off purposes ? They are not interested in Keith O. (nor MSNBC) in being successful and profitable because it hurts them in being able to off set the positive assets and avoid higher corporate tax 
liability ?  If I have not stated it correctly, please correct me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry &#8211; You are saying that Keith O. is a negative asset which is beneficial to the GE conglomerate which needs unprofitable intiities<br />
for write off purposes ? They are not interested in Keith O. (nor MSNBC) in being successful and profitable because it hurts them in being able to off set the positive assets and avoid higher corporate tax<br />
liability ?  If I have not stated it correctly, please correct me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15271</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15271</guid>
		<description>Jerry - You are saying that Keith O. is a negative asset which is beneficial to the GE conglomerate which needs unprofitable intiities&lt;br&gt;for write off purposes ? They are not interested in Keith O. (nor MSNBC) in being successful and profitable because it hurts them in being able to off set the positive assets and avoid higher corporate tax &lt;br&gt;liability ?  If I have not stated it correctly, please correct me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry &#8211; You are saying that Keith O. is a negative asset which is beneficial to the GE conglomerate which needs unprofitable intiities<br />for write off purposes ? They are not interested in Keith O. (nor MSNBC) in being successful and profitable because it hurts them in being able to off set the positive assets and avoid higher corporate tax <br />liability ?  If I have not stated it correctly, please correct me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-5890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5890</guid>
		<description>Again, let me remind people. MSNBC is part of the Global conglomerate G.E.  I&#039;ve just done a recent review of the annual report which states a loss from MSNBC as well as NBC. Which brings me to the conclusion, this is a write-off for G.E. because of the high burden they pay in U.S. corporate tax.G.E. is making headway however in the Global Eco servicing! I suggest they can plant Herr Olbermann in the rain forests and fertilize him and see if that will stop global warming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, let me remind people. MSNBC is part of the Global conglomerate G.E.  I&#8217;ve just done a recent review of the annual report which states a loss from MSNBC as well as NBC. Which brings me to the conclusion, this is a write-off for G.E. because of the high burden they pay in U.S. corporate tax.G.E. is making headway however in the Global Eco servicing! I suggest they can plant Herr Olbermann in the rain forests and fertilize him and see if that will stop global warming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15270</guid>
		<description>Again, let me remind people. MSNBC is part of the Global conglomerate G.E.  I&#039;ve just done a recent review of the annual report which states a loss from MSNBC as well as NBC. Which brings me to the conclusion, this is a write-off for G.E. because of the high burden they pay in U.S. corporate tax.G.E. is making headway however in the Global Eco servicing! I suggest they can plant Herr Olbermann in the rain forests and fertilize him and see if that will stop global warming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, let me remind people. MSNBC is part of the Global conglomerate G.E.  I&#39;ve just done a recent review of the annual report which states a loss from MSNBC as well as NBC. Which brings me to the conclusion, this is a write-off for G.E. because of the high burden they pay in U.S. corporate tax.G.E. is making headway however in the Global Eco servicing! I suggest they can plant Herr Olbermann in the rain forests and fertilize him and see if that will stop global warming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-5861</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5861</guid>
		<description>I just finished watching Keith O. on &quot;Countdown&quot; Wednesday  March 5th segment.
He branded Bill O. as the worser and worst person in the world and it was totaly imbecilic. Did anyone see this because I need some help here. I may be stupid so can any one of you saw this segment enlighten me why Bill O. is the &quot;Worst Person in the World&quot; ?  Remember, we are saying the worst person IN THE ENTIRE WORLD ! Think. We have North Korea, Iran, Code Pink in Berkeley... but a white guy hosting a competing cable program IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished watching Keith O. on &#8220;Countdown&#8221; Wednesday  March 5th segment.<br />
He branded Bill O. as the worser and worst person in the world and it was totaly imbecilic. Did anyone see this because I need some help here. I may be stupid so can any one of you saw this segment enlighten me why Bill O. is the &#8220;Worst Person in the World&#8221; ?  Remember, we are saying the worst person IN THE ENTIRE WORLD ! Think. We have North Korea, Iran, Code Pink in Berkeley&#8230; but a white guy hosting a competing cable program IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>I just finished watching Keith O. on &quot;Countdown&quot; Wednesday  March 5th segment.&lt;br&gt;He branded Bill O. as the worser and worst person in the world and it was totaly imbecilic. Did anyone see this because I need some help here. I may be stupid so can any one of you saw this segment enlighten me why Bill O. is the &quot;Worst Person in the World&quot; ?  Remember, we are saying the worst person IN THE ENTIRE WORLD ! Think. We have North Korea, Iran, Code Pink in Berkeley... but a white guy hosting a competing cable program IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished watching Keith O. on &#8220;Countdown&#8221; Wednesday  March 5th segment.<br />He branded Bill O. as the worser and worst person in the world and it was totaly imbecilic. Did anyone see this because I need some help here. I may be stupid so can any one of you saw this segment enlighten me why Bill O. is the &#8220;Worst Person in the World&#8221; ?  Remember, we are saying the worst person IN THE ENTIRE WORLD ! Think. We have North Korea, Iran, Code Pink in Berkeley&#8230; but a white guy hosting a competing cable program IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>Dude, c&#039;mon we &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/cable-news-ratings-through-thursday-february-28/2804&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ARE TVbytheNumbers.com&lt;/a&gt;!  We love everyone. if you click the link, you&#039;ll get your CNN and CNNHN data, as well as the others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, c&#8217;mon we <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/cable-news-ratings-through-thursday-february-28/2804" rel="nofollow">ARE TVbytheNumbers.com</a>!  We love everyone. if you click the link, you&#8217;ll get your CNN and CNNHN data, as well as the others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-2/#comment-15268</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15268</guid>
		<description>Dude, c&#039;mon we &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/cable-news-ratings-through-thursday-february-28/2804&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ARE TVbytheNumbers.com&lt;/a&gt;!  We love everyone. if you click the link, you&#039;ll get your CNN and CNNHN data, as well as the others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, c&#39;mon we <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/cable-news-ratings-through-thursday-february-28/2804" rel="nofollow">ARE TVbytheNumbers.com</a>!  We love everyone. if you click the link, you&#39;ll get your CNN and CNNHN data, as well as the others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>Wow, I think everyone needs to chill out.  Maybe you should start adding both the CNN and Headline news to avoid this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I think everyone needs to chill out.  Maybe you should start adding both the CNN and Headline news to avoid this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15267</guid>
		<description>Wow, I think everyone needs to chill out.  Maybe you should start adding both the CNN and Headline news to avoid this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I think everyone needs to chill out.  Maybe you should start adding both the CNN and Headline news to avoid this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>People Like Rush, Hannity Mark Levin and right wing talk radio in general is wiping the floor vs Air Head america. I wanna hear what the lefts excuse is. Face it Randi Rhodes Rachel Maddox and the rest are pathetic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People Like Rush, Hannity Mark Levin and right wing talk radio in general is wiping the floor vs Air Head america. I wanna hear what the lefts excuse is. Face it Randi Rhodes Rachel Maddox and the rest are pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15266</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15266</guid>
		<description>People Like Rush, Hannity Mark Levin and right wing talk radio in general is wiping the floor vs Air Head america. I wanna hear what the lefts excuse is. Face it Randi Rhodes Rachel Maddox and the rest are pathetic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People Like Rush, Hannity Mark Levin and right wing talk radio in general is wiping the floor vs Air Head america. I wanna hear what the lefts excuse is. Face it Randi Rhodes Rachel Maddox and the rest are pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5623</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5623</guid>
		<description>Kayarn,  You don&#039;t get to be old, being a fool.

Fact is in almost a decade on MSNBC  Bathtub boy can barely get over 600000 viewers. Lass than 1/4th the viewers of Bill O.

Reason?  Olbermann can&#039;t debate.  There is NEVER  anyone who disagrees with him. Plus his views are no different than 84301293092 other media talking heads from ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR...you name it.

Face it.... if Olberwacko were unique he would have an audience. 

If ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR would have not been so lefty bias for 40 years......they would have had someone like Bill O  already and Bill wouldn&#039;t have an audience.

Understand?  The reason Rush- Hannity-Ingraham-Levin-Savage-O&#039;reilly have huge audiences..... is because the void ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR created themselves- ignoring conservatives and Independents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kayarn,  You don&#8217;t get to be old, being a fool.</p>
<p>Fact is in almost a decade on MSNBC  Bathtub boy can barely get over 600000 viewers. Lass than 1/4th the viewers of Bill O.</p>
<p>Reason?  Olbermann can&#8217;t debate.  There is NEVER  anyone who disagrees with him. Plus his views are no different than 84301293092 other media talking heads from ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR&#8230;you name it.</p>
<p>Face it&#8230;. if Olberwacko were unique he would have an audience. </p>
<p>If ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR would have not been so lefty bias for 40 years&#8230;&#8230;they would have had someone like Bill O  already and Bill wouldn&#8217;t have an audience.</p>
<p>Understand?  The reason Rush- Hannity-Ingraham-Levin-Savage-O&#8217;reilly have huge audiences&#8230;.. is because the void ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR created themselves- ignoring conservatives and Independents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>Overbite is the most popular guy with the self hating Americans with their 5 dollar lattes and the short haired lesbians in combat boots. Overbite is worshipped by appeasing liberals with their moral outrage but face it the numbers dont lie. Overbite gets his pathetic a$$ kicked week in and week out. Hes pathetic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overbite is the most popular guy with the self hating Americans with their 5 dollar lattes and the short haired lesbians in combat boots. Overbite is worshipped by appeasing liberals with their moral outrage but face it the numbers dont lie. Overbite gets his pathetic a$$ kicked week in and week out. Hes pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15265</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15265</guid>
		<description>Kayarn,  You don&#039;t get to be old, being a fool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fact is in almost a decade on MSNBC  Bathtub boy can barely get over 600000 viewers. Lass than 1/4th the viewers of Bill O.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reason?  Olbermann can&#039;t debate.  There is NEVER  anyone who disagrees with him. Plus his views are no different than 84301293092 other media talking heads from ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR...you name it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Face it.... if Olberwacko were unique he would have an audience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR would have not been so lefty bias for 40 years......they would have had someone like Bill O  already and Bill wouldn&#039;t have an audience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Understand?  The reason Rush- Hannity-Ingraham-Levin-Savage-O&#039;reilly have huge audiences..... is because the void ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR created themselves- ignoring conservatives and Independents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kayarn,  You don&#39;t get to be old, being a fool.</p>
<p>Fact is in almost a decade on MSNBC  Bathtub boy can barely get over 600000 viewers. Lass than 1/4th the viewers of Bill O.</p>
<p>Reason?  Olbermann can&#39;t debate.  There is NEVER  anyone who disagrees with him. Plus his views are no different than 84301293092 other media talking heads from ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR&#8230;you name it.</p>
<p>Face it&#8230;. if Olberwacko were unique he would have an audience. </p>
<p>If ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR would have not been so lefty bias for 40 years&#8230;&#8230;they would have had someone like Bill O  already and Bill wouldn&#39;t have an audience.</p>
<p>Understand?  The reason Rush- Hannity-Ingraham-Levin-Savage-O&#39;reilly have huge audiences&#8230;.. is because the void ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS-NPR created themselves- ignoring conservatives and Independents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>Overbite is the most popular guy with the self hating Americans with their 5 dollar lattes and the short haired lesbians in combat boots. Overbite is worshipped by appeasing liberals with their moral outrage but face it the numbers dont lie. Overbite gets his pathetic a$$ kicked week in and week out. Hes pathetic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overbite is the most popular guy with the self hating Americans with their 5 dollar lattes and the short haired lesbians in combat boots. Overbite is worshipped by appeasing liberals with their moral outrage but face it the numbers dont lie. Overbite gets his pathetic a$$ kicked week in and week out. Hes pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>do you bow down to an o&#039;reilly shrine or something? 

robert is right, they both are really really really rich. and even though o&#039;reilly calls msnbc a failure, they still managed to rake in about $200 million profit in the i believe 06 projections. and things have just gone up for them in 07.

o&#039;reilly has only about 100,000 more demo viewers than olbermann, so whats that say? that over 2 million of the 3 or so million that watch his show are old. he has a lot of old people watching him. the average viewer is over 70. thats not really something to brag about, that you are the most popular guy at the senior center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you bow down to an o&#8217;reilly shrine or something? </p>
<p>robert is right, they both are really really really rich. and even though o&#8217;reilly calls msnbc a failure, they still managed to rake in about $200 million profit in the i believe 06 projections. and things have just gone up for them in 07.</p>
<p>o&#8217;reilly has only about 100,000 more demo viewers than olbermann, so whats that say? that over 2 million of the 3 or so million that watch his show are old. he has a lot of old people watching him. the average viewer is over 70. thats not really something to brag about, that you are the most popular guy at the senior center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15263</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15263</guid>
		<description>do you bow down to an o&#039;reilly shrine or something? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;robert is right, they both are really really really rich. and even though o&#039;reilly calls msnbc a failure, they still managed to rake in about $200 million profit in the i believe 06 projections. and things have just gone up for them in 07.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;o&#039;reilly has only about 100,000 more demo viewers than olbermann, so whats that say? that over 2 million of the 3 or so million that watch his show are old. he has a lot of old people watching him. the average viewer is over 70. thats not really something to brag about, that you are the most popular guy at the senior center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you bow down to an o&#39;reilly shrine or something? </p>
<p>robert is right, they both are really really really rich. and even though o&#39;reilly calls msnbc a failure, they still managed to rake in about $200 million profit in the i believe 06 projections. and things have just gone up for them in 07.</p>
<p>o&#39;reilly has only about 100,000 more demo viewers than olbermann, so whats that say? that over 2 million of the 3 or so million that watch his show are old. he has a lot of old people watching him. the average viewer is over 70. thats not really something to brag about, that you are the most popular guy at the senior center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>Of course I know that but Keith Overbite with his dismal ratings is really pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I know that but Keith Overbite with his dismal ratings is really pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADAM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/comment-page-1/#comment-15262</link>
		<dc:creator>ADAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15262</guid>
		<description>Of course I know that but Keith Overbite with his dismal ratings is really pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I know that but Keith Overbite with his dismal ratings is really pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

