<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Season to Date Broadcast Net Ratings, through Mar 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829/comment-page-1/#comment-5727</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829#comment-5727</guid>
		<description>David Poltrack!! A better lecturer than a prognosticator, but I think it should work out like this: if CBS catches up we&#039;ll write about how the 55+ viewer is the vital ad demographic, about how well monetized Internet streaming is and of course about how commercial viewing while fast forwarding is just as effective as if you&#039;d watched the commercials.

If he&#039;s wrong, CBS gives us a million bucks (obviously they have the money to burn!)

What do you say Mr. Poltrack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Poltrack!! A better lecturer than a prognosticator, but I think it should work out like this: if CBS catches up we&#8217;ll write about how the 55+ viewer is the vital ad demographic, about how well monetized Internet streaming is and of course about how commercial viewing while fast forwarding is just as effective as if you&#8217;d watched the commercials.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s wrong, CBS gives us a million bucks (obviously they have the money to burn!)</p>
<p>What do you say Mr. Poltrack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829/comment-page-1/#comment-306731</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/04/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-through-mar-2/2829#comment-306731</guid>
		<description>David Poltrack!! A better lecturer than a prognosticator, but I think it should work out like this: if CBS catches up we&#039;ll write about how the 55+ viewer is the vital ad demographic, about how well monetized Internet streaming is and of course about how commercial viewing while fast forwarding is just as effective as if you&#039;d watched the commercials.

If he&#039;s wrong, CBS gives us a million bucks (obviously they have the money to burn!)

What do you say Mr. Poltrack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Poltrack!! A better lecturer than a prognosticator, but I think it should work out like this: if CBS catches up we&#8217;ll write about how the 55+ viewer is the vital ad demographic, about how well monetized Internet streaming is and of course about how commercial viewing while fast forwarding is just as effective as if you&#8217;d watched the commercials.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s wrong, CBS gives us a million bucks (obviously they have the money to burn!)</p>
<p>What do you say Mr. Poltrack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

