<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Bringing 30 Rock Back Isn&#039;t Crazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-44225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-44225</guid>
		<description>After seeing this show win awards year after year I have watched some of it on both hulu and live/DVR and...I just don&#039;t like it! I&#039;m sorry, please don&#039;t hate me!!! I thought maybe it would kind of &quot;smart funny&quot; since it has low ratings but wins over the critics, but I thought that most of the jokes were just your average sitcom fair. Nothing really wrong with that, I guess I just had the wrong expectations going into it. Someone please explain what makes this show great? or even good? From what I&#039;ve seen its just a mediocre sitcom...based on tina feys life, revolving around...Tina Fey...is that really the joke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing this show win awards year after year I have watched some of it on both hulu and live/DVR and&#8230;I just don&#8217;t like it! I&#8217;m sorry, please don&#8217;t hate me!!! I thought maybe it would kind of &#8220;smart funny&#8221; since it has low ratings but wins over the critics, but I thought that most of the jokes were just your average sitcom fair. Nothing really wrong with that, I guess I just had the wrong expectations going into it. Someone please explain what makes this show great? or even good? From what I&#8217;ve seen its just a mediocre sitcom&#8230;based on tina feys life, revolving around&#8230;Tina Fey&#8230;is that really the joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan from Princeton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-10929</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan from Princeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-10929</guid>
		<description>&quot;Baby Mama&quot; has a whole host of problems that, in some ways, make it even worse than &quot;30 Rock&quot;. But I don&#039;t hold Fey accountable for them.  After all, she didn&#039;t write the screenplay.  

On what planet does someone like Greg Kinnear even give a second glance at someone like the neurotic character played by Fey?  Not on any planet I&#039;m living on.  And what up with the astonishing odds-defying pregnancy that practically announces itself half way through the movie? How&#039;s that supposed to make the hundreds of thousands of infertile women in their late 30&#039;s feel?  That all they have to do is find the love of their life to get pregnant?  This is not how real life works.  I recognize that a movie is supposed to provide escape from reality, but when it does so at the expense of women who are genuinely suffering, I have a problem with that.  But then, what could you expect from a male screenwriter, whose wife is probably pumping out her fourth kid as we speak?

I did like that important class issues were raised in &quot;Baby Mama&quot;, yet never fully resolved.  Just as they will likely never be resolved in real life.  Not in our lifetimes, anyway.

But, hey, what do I know?  I&#039;m just a scientist.  I leave it up to people like you to work the numbers and make the Hollywood elite even more sick rich than they already are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Baby Mama&#8221; has a whole host of problems that, in some ways, make it even worse than &#8220;30 Rock&#8221;. But I don&#8217;t hold Fey accountable for them.  After all, she didn&#8217;t write the screenplay.  </p>
<p>On what planet does someone like Greg Kinnear even give a second glance at someone like the neurotic character played by Fey?  Not on any planet I&#8217;m living on.  And what up with the astonishing odds-defying pregnancy that practically announces itself half way through the movie? How&#8217;s that supposed to make the hundreds of thousands of infertile women in their late 30&#8242;s feel?  That all they have to do is find the love of their life to get pregnant?  This is not how real life works.  I recognize that a movie is supposed to provide escape from reality, but when it does so at the expense of women who are genuinely suffering, I have a problem with that.  But then, what could you expect from a male screenwriter, whose wife is probably pumping out her fourth kid as we speak?</p>
<p>I did like that important class issues were raised in &#8220;Baby Mama&#8221;, yet never fully resolved.  Just as they will likely never be resolved in real life.  Not in our lifetimes, anyway.</p>
<p>But, hey, what do I know?  I&#8217;m just a scientist.  I leave it up to people like you to work the numbers and make the Hollywood elite even more sick rich than they already are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan from Princeton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-15257</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan from Princeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15257</guid>
		<description>&quot;Baby Mama&quot; has a whole host of problems that, in some ways, make it even worse than &quot;30 Rock&quot;. But I don&#039;t hold Fey accountable for them.  After all, she didn&#039;t write the screenplay.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On what planet does someone like Greg Kinnear even give a second glance at someone like the neurotic character played by Fey?  Not on any planet I&#039;m living on.  And what up with the astonishing odds-defying pregnancy that practically announces itself half way through the movie? How&#039;s that supposed to make the hundreds of thousands of infertile women in their late 30&#039;s feel?  That all they have to do is find the love of their life to get pregnant?  This is not how real life works.  I recognize that a movie is supposed to provide escape from reality, but when it does so at the expense of women who are genuinely suffering, I have a problem with that.  But then, what could you expect from a male screenwriter, whose wife is probably pumping out her fourth kid as we speak?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did like that important class issues were raised in &quot;Baby Mama&quot;, yet never fully resolved.  Just as they will likely never be resolved in real life.  Not in our lifetimes, anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, hey, what do I know?  I&#039;m just a scientist.  I leave it up to people like you to work the numbers and make the Hollywood elite even more sick rich than they already are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Baby Mama&#8221; has a whole host of problems that, in some ways, make it even worse than &#8220;30 Rock&#8221;. But I don&#39;t hold Fey accountable for them.  After all, she didn&#39;t write the screenplay.  </p>
<p>On what planet does someone like Greg Kinnear even give a second glance at someone like the neurotic character played by Fey?  Not on any planet I&#39;m living on.  And what up with the astonishing odds-defying pregnancy that practically announces itself half way through the movie? How&#39;s that supposed to make the hundreds of thousands of infertile women in their late 30&#39;s feel?  That all they have to do is find the love of their life to get pregnant?  This is not how real life works.  I recognize that a movie is supposed to provide escape from reality, but when it does so at the expense of women who are genuinely suffering, I have a problem with that.  But then, what could you expect from a male screenwriter, whose wife is probably pumping out her fourth kid as we speak?</p>
<p>I did like that important class issues were raised in &#8220;Baby Mama&#8221;, yet never fully resolved.  Just as they will likely never be resolved in real life.  Not in our lifetimes, anyway.</p>
<p>But, hey, what do I know?  I&#39;m just a scientist.  I leave it up to people like you to work the numbers and make the Hollywood elite even more sick rich than they already are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-10908</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-10908</guid>
		<description>Susan, we&#039;re two guys who just look at numbers on spreadsheets without getting bitter.  And similar spreadsheets seem to indicate Baby Mama was the number one movie this weekend, though admittedly no blockbuster.

The show does fairly well among 18-49 year olds, whether you know any who watch or not, and does even better among 18-49 year olds after DVR viewing is added in.

That doesn&#039;t mean that the NBC and GE execs don&#039;t have aspirations of nailing Tina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, we&#8217;re two guys who just look at numbers on spreadsheets without getting bitter.  And similar spreadsheets seem to indicate Baby Mama was the number one movie this weekend, though admittedly no blockbuster.</p>
<p>The show does fairly well among 18-49 year olds, whether you know any who watch or not, and does even better among 18-49 year olds after DVR viewing is added in.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that the NBC and GE execs don&#8217;t have aspirations of nailing Tina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-15256</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15256</guid>
		<description>Susan, we&#039;re two guys who just look at numbers on spreadsheets without getting bitter.  And similar spreadsheets seem to indicate Baby Mama was the number one movie this weekend, though admittedly no blockbuster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The show does fairly well among 18-49 year olds, whether you know any who watch or not, and does even better among 18-49 year olds after DVR viewing is added in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That doesn&#039;t mean that the NBC and GE execs don&#039;t have aspirations of nailing Tina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, we&#39;re two guys who just look at numbers on spreadsheets without getting bitter.  And similar spreadsheets seem to indicate Baby Mama was the number one movie this weekend, though admittedly no blockbuster.</p>
<p>The show does fairly well among 18-49 year olds, whether you know any who watch or not, and does even better among 18-49 year olds after DVR viewing is added in.</p>
<p>That doesn&#39;t mean that the NBC and GE execs don&#39;t have aspirations of nailing Tina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan from Princeton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-10906</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan from Princeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-10906</guid>
		<description>Who are you guys?  Industry insiders?  Because nobody 18-49 that I know thinks 30 Rock is a good show.  Tracy Morgan is badly cast.  Jane Krakowski is essentially playing the same annoyingly narcissistic character she played on &quot;Ally McBeal&quot;.  Way long before the recent release of &quot;Baby Mama&quot;, Tina Fey started to believe her own press, and her oddly misplaced self-regard is woven tightly into the fabric of the script.  The only reason I occassionly watch it is for Alec Baldwin, but even his insanely vapid character gets tiresome after a while.

The show blows.  Those NBC and GE execs must have some kind of delusions about nailing Tina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you guys?  Industry insiders?  Because nobody 18-49 that I know thinks 30 Rock is a good show.  Tracy Morgan is badly cast.  Jane Krakowski is essentially playing the same annoyingly narcissistic character she played on &#8220;Ally McBeal&#8221;.  Way long before the recent release of &#8220;Baby Mama&#8221;, Tina Fey started to believe her own press, and her oddly misplaced self-regard is woven tightly into the fabric of the script.  The only reason I occassionly watch it is for Alec Baldwin, but even his insanely vapid character gets tiresome after a while.</p>
<p>The show blows.  Those NBC and GE execs must have some kind of delusions about nailing Tina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan from Princeton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-15255</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan from Princeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15255</guid>
		<description>Who are you guys?  Industry insiders?  Because nobody 18-49 that I know thinks 30 Rock is a good show.  Tracy Morgan is badly cast.  Jane Krakowski is essentially playing the same annoyingly narcissistic character she played on &quot;Ally McBeal&quot;.  Way long before the recent release of &quot;Baby Mama&quot;, Tina Fey started to believe her own press, and her oddly misplaced self-regard is woven tightly into the fabric of the script.  The only reason I occassionly watch it is for Alec Baldwin, but even his insanely vapid character gets tiresome after a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The show blows.  Those NBC and GE execs must have some kind of delusions about nailing Tina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you guys?  Industry insiders?  Because nobody 18-49 that I know thinks 30 Rock is a good show.  Tracy Morgan is badly cast.  Jane Krakowski is essentially playing the same annoyingly narcissistic character she played on &#8220;Ally McBeal&#8221;.  Way long before the recent release of &#8220;Baby Mama&#8221;, Tina Fey started to believe her own press, and her oddly misplaced self-regard is woven tightly into the fabric of the script.  The only reason I occassionly watch it is for Alec Baldwin, but even his insanely vapid character gets tiresome after a while.</p>
<p>The show blows.  Those NBC and GE execs must have some kind of delusions about nailing Tina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8578</guid>
		<description>Matt, overall numbers don&#039;t matter.  Only the demos matter.  6 million viewers wouldn&#039;t cut it even at NBC if too many of them were age 50+, and it would&#039;ve been fine for Jericho if enough of them had been young folks.  Ageist, yes, but that&#039;s how the advertisers operate.  They truly, deeply, totally believe that people above the age of 49 (or 54 at the outside) rarely switch brands or try new things.

Joe, I believe the $100k household ratings are really, really key here in terms of 30 Rock&#039;s survival.  From what I&#039;ve heard, this is also the reason why Boston Legal is still on the air at ABC despite mediocre overall numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, overall numbers don&#8217;t matter.  Only the demos matter.  6 million viewers wouldn&#8217;t cut it even at NBC if too many of them were age 50+, and it would&#8217;ve been fine for Jericho if enough of them had been young folks.  Ageist, yes, but that&#8217;s how the advertisers operate.  They truly, deeply, totally believe that people above the age of 49 (or 54 at the outside) rarely switch brands or try new things.</p>
<p>Joe, I believe the $100k household ratings are really, really key here in terms of 30 Rock&#8217;s survival.  From what I&#8217;ve heard, this is also the reason why Boston Legal is still on the air at ABC despite mediocre overall numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-2/#comment-15254</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15254</guid>
		<description>Matt, overall numbers don&#039;t matter.  Only the demos matter.  6 million viewers wouldn&#039;t cut it even at NBC if too many of them were age 50+, and it would&#039;ve been fine for Jericho if enough of them had been young folks.  Ageist, yes, but that&#039;s how the advertisers operate.  They truly, deeply, totally believe that people above the age of 49 (or 54 at the outside) rarely switch brands or try new things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe, I believe the $100k household ratings are really, really key here in terms of 30 Rock&#039;s survival.  From what I&#039;ve heard, this is also the reason why Boston Legal is still on the air at ABC despite mediocre overall numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, overall numbers don&#39;t matter.  Only the demos matter.  6 million viewers wouldn&#39;t cut it even at NBC if too many of them were age 50+, and it would&#39;ve been fine for Jericho if enough of them had been young folks.  Ageist, yes, but that&#39;s how the advertisers operate.  They truly, deeply, totally believe that people above the age of 49 (or 54 at the outside) rarely switch brands or try new things.</p>
<p>Joe, I believe the $100k household ratings are really, really key here in terms of 30 Rock&#39;s survival.  From what I&#39;ve heard, this is also the reason why Boston Legal is still on the air at ABC despite mediocre overall numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>A huge difference to killing Jericho but renewing 30 Rock is the network.  30 Rock is on NBC where it can stand a 6 Million shows.

Jericho was on CBS.  6 Million does not fly there.    I&#039;d bet that if 30 Rock was on CBS it would be in hot water right now.

I mean How I Met Your Mother was in trouble and that had 8+ Million average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge difference to killing Jericho but renewing 30 Rock is the network.  30 Rock is on NBC where it can stand a 6 Million shows.</p>
<p>Jericho was on CBS.  6 Million does not fly there.    I&#8217;d bet that if 30 Rock was on CBS it would be in hot water right now.</p>
<p>I mean How I Met Your Mother was in trouble and that had 8+ Million average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15253</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15253</guid>
		<description>A huge difference to killing Jericho but renewing 30 Rock is the network.  30 Rock is on NBC where it can stand a 6 Million shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jericho was on CBS.  6 Million does not fly there.    I&#039;d bet that if 30 Rock was on CBS it would be in hot water right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean How I Met Your Mother was in trouble and that had 8+ Million average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge difference to killing Jericho but renewing 30 Rock is the network.  30 Rock is on NBC where it can stand a 6 Million shows.</p>
<p>Jericho was on CBS.  6 Million does not fly there.    I&#39;d bet that if 30 Rock was on CBS it would be in hot water right now.</p>
<p>I mean How I Met Your Mother was in trouble and that had 8+ Million average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8459</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8459</guid>
		<description>Also I think they believe 30 Rock has growth potential.....maybe it will never be a Top 30 show but its momentum is positive and we know Jericho&#039;s was negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I think they believe 30 Rock has growth potential&#8230;..maybe it will never be a Top 30 show but its momentum is positive and we know Jericho&#8217;s was negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15252</guid>
		<description>Also I think they believe 30 Rock has growth potential.....maybe it will never be a Top 30 show but its momentum is positive and we know Jericho&#039;s was negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I think they believe 30 Rock has growth potential&#8230;..maybe it will never be a Top 30 show but its momentum is positive and we know Jericho&#39;s was negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8453</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8453</guid>
		<description>Bill, but if you look at the 18-49 with all the most current LIVE+7 days DVR viewing baked in, Lipstick Jungle jumps from 84th to 70th.  Not that they can sell it, or that it isn&#039;t still beggardly, but as with 30 Rock as well, the DVRs do improve its 18-49 numbers more than just a teeny tiny bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, but if you look at the 18-49 with all the most current LIVE+7 days DVR viewing baked in, Lipstick Jungle jumps from 84th to 70th.  Not that they can sell it, or that it isn&#8217;t still beggardly, but as with 30 Rock as well, the DVRs do improve its 18-49 numbers more than just a teeny tiny bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15251</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15251</guid>
		<description>Bill, but if you look at the 18-49 with all the most current LIVE+7 days DVR viewing baked in, Lipstick Jungle jumps from 84th to 70th.  Not that they can sell it, or that it isn&#039;t still beggardly, but as with 30 Rock as well, the DVRs do improve its 18-49 numbers more than just a teeny tiny bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, but if you look at the 18-49 with all the most current LIVE+7 days DVR viewing baked in, Lipstick Jungle jumps from 84th to 70th.  Not that they can sell it, or that it isn&#39;t still beggardly, but as with 30 Rock as well, the DVRs do improve its 18-49 numbers more than just a teeny tiny bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8447</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that CBS overall has a much stronger line up than NBC and can afford to be a bit choosier with the shows that it renews.

NBC also just renewed Lipstick Jungle, which is the #87 season to date show for 18-49.

Beggars cannot be choosers. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that CBS overall has a much stronger line up than NBC and can afford to be a bit choosier with the shows that it renews.</p>
<p>NBC also just renewed Lipstick Jungle, which is the #87 season to date show for 18-49.</p>
<p>Beggars cannot be choosers. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15250</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15250</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that CBS overall has a much stronger line up than NBC and can afford to be a bit choosier with the shows that it renews.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NBC also just renewed Lipstick Jungle, which is the #87 season to date show for 18-49.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beggars cannot be choosers. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that CBS overall has a much stronger line up than NBC and can afford to be a bit choosier with the shows that it renews.</p>
<p>NBC also just renewed Lipstick Jungle, which is the #87 season to date show for 18-49.</p>
<p>Beggars cannot be choosers. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8446</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8446</guid>
		<description>Fair question - reasonable response... ;-)

I also wanted to thank you guys for doing a yeoman&#039;s job here with this site.  I&#039;ve been looking for a place to get these kind of numbers and analysis for a LONG time.  Thanks so much for the hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair question &#8211; reasonable response&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I also wanted to thank you guys for doing a yeoman&#8217;s job here with this site.  I&#8217;ve been looking for a place to get these kind of numbers and analysis for a LONG time.  Thanks so much for the hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15249</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15249</guid>
		<description>Fair question - reasonable response... ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also wanted to thank you guys for doing a yeoman&#039;s job here with this site.  I&#039;ve been looking for a place to get these kind of numbers and analysis for a LONG time.  Thanks so much for the hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair question &#8211; reasonable response&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I also wanted to thank you guys for doing a yeoman&#39;s job here with this site.  I&#39;ve been looking for a place to get these kind of numbers and analysis for a LONG time.  Thanks so much for the hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8443</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8443</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair question. No bias.

there are a few factors, but mostly it&#039;s the 18-49 demo, where on a LIVE+SD basis, Jericho was 126 and 30 Rock was 64th.

From what i gather 30 Rock also has better DVD sales and it also has much better syndication prospects -- shows that don&#039;t require you to have watched the episodes that came before them to enjoy them generally fare better in syndication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair question. No bias.</p>
<p>there are a few factors, but mostly it&#8217;s the 18-49 demo, where on a LIVE+SD basis, Jericho was 126 and 30 Rock was 64th.</p>
<p>From what i gather 30 Rock also has better DVD sales and it also has much better syndication prospects &#8212; shows that don&#8217;t require you to have watched the episodes that came before them to enjoy them generally fare better in syndication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15248</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15248</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair question. No bias.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;there are a few factors, but mostly it&#039;s the 18-49 demo, where on a LIVE+SD basis, Jericho was 126 and 30 Rock was 64th.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what i gather 30 Rock also has better DVD sales and it also has much better syndication prospects -- shows that don&#039;t require you to have watched the episodes that came before them to enjoy them generally fare better in syndication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a fair question. No bias.</p>
<p>there are a few factors, but mostly it&#39;s the 18-49 demo, where on a LIVE+SD basis, Jericho was 126 and 30 Rock was 64th.</p>
<p>From what i gather 30 Rock also has better DVD sales and it also has much better syndication prospects &#8212; shows that don&#39;t require you to have watched the episodes that came before them to enjoy them generally fare better in syndication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8442</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8442</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not being a hater here - just a question.  Why would you think it&#039;s a no-brainer to kill Jericho for low ratings, yet think it makes sense to bring back 30 Rock with equally bad ratings?  Lower production costs?  Bias?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not being a hater here &#8211; just a question.  Why would you think it&#8217;s a no-brainer to kill Jericho for low ratings, yet think it makes sense to bring back 30 Rock with equally bad ratings?  Lower production costs?  Bias?  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15247</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15247</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not being a hater here - just a question.  Why would you think it&#039;s a no-brainer to kill Jericho for low ratings, yet think it makes sense to bring back 30 Rock with equally bad ratings?  Lower production costs?  Bias?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not being a hater here &#8211; just a question.  Why would you think it&#39;s a no-brainer to kill Jericho for low ratings, yet think it makes sense to bring back 30 Rock with equally bad ratings?  Lower production costs?  Bias?  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8428</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8428</guid>
		<description>I agree, Sam.  And yeah, the product placement with Snapple and others and that they handle the overt nature of it in such a jokey way -- I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Sam.  And yeah, the product placement with Snapple and others and that they handle the overt nature of it in such a jokey way &#8212; I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15246</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15246</guid>
		<description>I agree, Sam.  And yeah, the product placement with Snapple and others and that they handle the overt nature of it in such a jokey way -- I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Sam.  And yeah, the product placement with Snapple and others and that they handle the overt nature of it in such a jokey way &#8212; I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8427</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8427</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts.  First, and I don&#039;t know any of the numbers, but 30 ROCK pioneers prominent product integration, providing a revenue stream outside the ad buys.  Second, 30 ROCK, has become a self-referential flagship for NBC/GE that works well for promos and developing web content.  I think for those two reasons alone, plus their relationship with Tina Fey, will keep the show on the air up to syndication (USA would be perfect...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts.  First, and I don&#8217;t know any of the numbers, but 30 ROCK pioneers prominent product integration, providing a revenue stream outside the ad buys.  Second, 30 ROCK, has become a self-referential flagship for NBC/GE that works well for promos and developing web content.  I think for those two reasons alone, plus their relationship with Tina Fey, will keep the show on the air up to syndication (USA would be perfect&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15245</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15245</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts.  First, and I don&#039;t know any of the numbers, but 30 ROCK pioneers prominent product integration, providing a revenue stream outside the ad buys.  Second, 30 ROCK, has become a self-referential flagship for NBC/GE that works well for promos and developing web content.  I think for those two reasons alone, plus their relationship with Tina Fey, will keep the show on the air up to syndication (USA would be perfect...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts.  First, and I don&#39;t know any of the numbers, but 30 ROCK pioneers prominent product integration, providing a revenue stream outside the ad buys.  Second, 30 ROCK, has become a self-referential flagship for NBC/GE that works well for promos and developing web content.  I think for those two reasons alone, plus their relationship with Tina Fey, will keep the show on the air up to syndication (USA would be perfect&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not crazy at all.  Even if only 6 million people watch, it&#039;ll still post NBC&#039;s Emmy and award count.  It&#039;s definately worth the half hour air space.  

30 Rock is ahead of its time by 3 years or so.  If it makes it so syndication, NBC will turn a pretty penny then.

Also, from what I hear, great DVD sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not crazy at all.  Even if only 6 million people watch, it&#8217;ll still post NBC&#8217;s Emmy and award count.  It&#8217;s definately worth the half hour air space.  </p>
<p>30 Rock is ahead of its time by 3 years or so.  If it makes it so syndication, NBC will turn a pretty penny then.</p>
<p>Also, from what I hear, great DVD sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176/comment-page-1/#comment-15244</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/03/why-bringing-30-rock-back-isnt-crazy/3176#comment-15244</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not crazy at all.  Even if only 6 million people watch, it&#039;ll still post NBC&#039;s Emmy and award count.  It&#039;s definately worth the half hour air space.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;30 Rock is ahead of its time by 3 years or so.  If it makes it so syndication, NBC will turn a pretty penny then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, from what I hear, great DVD sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not crazy at all.  Even if only 6 million people watch, it&#39;ll still post NBC&#39;s Emmy and award count.  It&#39;s definately worth the half hour air space.  </p>
<p>30 Rock is ahead of its time by 3 years or so.  If it makes it so syndication, NBC will turn a pretty penny then.</p>
<p>Also, from what I hear, great DVD sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

