<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Apr 13: Housewives Were Back, But Ratings Look Desperate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>yes, it was.  you commented on SUNDAY&#039;S post. SVU was not a rerun on Tuesday, April 15, but these aren&#039;t the numbers for that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it was.  you commented on SUNDAY&#8217;S post. SVU was not a rerun on Tuesday, April 15, but these aren&#8217;t the numbers for that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-18327</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18327</guid>
		<description>yes, it was.  you commented on SUNDAY&#039;S post. SVU was not a rerun on Tuesday, April 15, but these aren&#039;t the numbers for that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it was.  you commented on SUNDAY&#39;S post. SVU was not a rerun on Tuesday, April 15, but these aren&#39;t the numbers for that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-9682</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9682</guid>
		<description>SVU was NOT a repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SVU was NOT a repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-18326</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18326</guid>
		<description>SVU was NOT a repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SVU was NOT a repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-9470</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9470</guid>
		<description>Maybe absence of Extreme Home Makeover did hurt &quot;Desperate&quot; ratings a little .... because that Oparah´s show is boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe absence of Extreme Home Makeover did hurt &#8220;Desperate&#8221; ratings a little &#8230;. because that Oparah´s show is boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-18325</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18325</guid>
		<description>Maybe absence of Extreme Home Makeover did hurt &quot;Desperate&quot; ratings a little .... because that Oparah´s show is boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe absence of Extreme Home Makeover did hurt &#8220;Desperate&#8221; ratings a little &#8230;. because that Oparah´s show is boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-9469</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9469</guid>
		<description>Thanks Billy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Billy <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-4/#comment-18324</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18324</guid>
		<description>Thanks Billy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Billy <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9467</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9467</guid>
		<description>Dene, DVR numbers will be out in two weeks from today (4/29) for last weeks shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dene, DVR numbers will be out in two weeks from today (4/29) for last weeks shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18323</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18323</guid>
		<description>Dene, DVR numbers will be out in two weeks from today (4/29) for last weeks shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dene, DVR numbers will be out in two weeks from today (4/29) for last weeks shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9445</guid>
		<description>Hi ... I´´m not worry about DH ratings, because its 1st episode since that looong hiatus (damn WGA strike!) ... I hope DH will pull more viewers (at least 17.5 m) next week.
Btw when we will get DVR+ numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8230; I´´m not worry about DH ratings, because its 1st episode since that looong hiatus (damn WGA strike!) &#8230; I hope DH will pull more viewers (at least 17.5 m) next week.<br />
Btw when we will get DVR+ numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dene</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18322</guid>
		<description>Hi ... I´´m not worry about DH ratings, because its 1st episode since that looong hiatus (damn WGA strike!) ... I hope DH will pull more viewers (at least 17.5 m) next week.&lt;br&gt;Btw when we will get DVR+ numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8230; I´´m not worry about DH ratings, because its 1st episode since that looong hiatus (damn WGA strike!) &#8230; I hope DH will pull more viewers (at least 17.5 m) next week.<br />Btw when we will get DVR+ numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9432</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9432</guid>
		<description>Do you think last night&#039;s episode after DH will pull in a lot of new viewers for the finale or will it just be hurt more by just having a Lost rerun as its lead-in once again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think last night&#8217;s episode after DH will pull in a lot of new viewers for the finale or will it just be hurt more by just having a Lost rerun as its lead-in once again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18321</guid>
		<description>Do you think last night&#039;s episode after DH will pull in a lot of new viewers for the finale or will it just be hurt more by just having a Lost rerun as its lead-in once again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think last night&#39;s episode after DH will pull in a lot of new viewers for the finale or will it just be hurt more by just having a Lost rerun as its lead-in once again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9429</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9429</guid>
		<description>Sam, I don&#039;t really have an answer for that.  I think if it does in the 5.8-6.5 million range LIVE+SD, it&#039; neutral to its current case. Below that, it may not be neutral and above that, it&#039;s a bonus.

Eli has been pulling over a million DVR users, almost all of them in the 18-49 range, but it&#039;s live+SD 18-49 rating has been dwindling (other than last night after DH).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I don&#8217;t really have an answer for that.  I think if it does in the 5.8-6.5 million range LIVE+SD, it&#8217; neutral to its current case. Below that, it may not be neutral and above that, it&#8217;s a bonus.</p>
<p>Eli has been pulling over a million DVR users, almost all of them in the 18-49 range, but it&#8217;s live+SD 18-49 rating has been dwindling (other than last night after DH).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18320</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18320</guid>
		<description>Sam, I don&#039;t really have an answer for that.  I think if it does in the 5.8-6.5 million range LIVE+SD, it&#039; neutral to its current case. Below that, it may not be neutral and above that, it&#039;s a bonus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eli has been pulling over a million DVR users, almost all of them in the 18-49 range, but it&#039;s live+SD 18-49 rating has been dwindling (other than last night after DH).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I don&#39;t really have an answer for that.  I think if it does in the 5.8-6.5 million range LIVE+SD, it&#39; neutral to its current case. Below that, it may not be neutral and above that, it&#39;s a bonus.</p>
<p>Eli has been pulling over a million DVR users, almost all of them in the 18-49 range, but it&#39;s live+SD 18-49 rating has been dwindling (other than last night after DH).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9425</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9425</guid>
		<description>&gt;

it was 16 million. why is that so difficult to figure out? not 15. not whatever. 16! is it not clear? it&#039;s listed right above...  on this page... in the original story.

i&#039;m not sure why there are people who don&#039;t like a certain network like abc or a certain show as though they were all ex lovers...  but there&#039;s nothing bad happening. it was a little low in a post strike, first new episode in 3 months, post tornado storyline world. no need to rejoice the death of a top 5 show or a network based on one episode getting 16 million viewers instead of 18... especially when DH got 16 million last year and DH got less than 16 in last year&#039;s equivalent episode for next week. plus the dvr numbers will easily put them ahead of last season&#039;s episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;</p>
<p>it was 16 million. why is that so difficult to figure out? not 15. not whatever. 16! is it not clear? it&#8217;s listed right above&#8230;  on this page&#8230; in the original story.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sure why there are people who don&#8217;t like a certain network like abc or a certain show as though they were all ex lovers&#8230;  but there&#8217;s nothing bad happening. it was a little low in a post strike, first new episode in 3 months, post tornado storyline world. no need to rejoice the death of a top 5 show or a network based on one episode getting 16 million viewers instead of 18&#8230; especially when DH got 16 million last year and DH got less than 16 in last year&#8217;s equivalent episode for next week. plus the dvr numbers will easily put them ahead of last season&#8217;s episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18319</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18319</guid>
		<description>&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it was 16 million. why is that so difficult to figure out? not 15. not whatever. 16! is it not clear? it&#039;s listed right above...  on this page... in the original story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i&#039;m not sure why there are people who don&#039;t like a certain network like abc or a certain show as though they were all ex lovers...  but there&#039;s nothing bad happening. it was a little low in a post strike, first new episode in 3 months, post tornado storyline world. no need to rejoice the death of a top 5 show or a network based on one episode getting 16 million viewers instead of 18... especially when DH got 16 million last year and DH got less than 16 in last year&#039;s equivalent episode for next week. plus the dvr numbers will easily put them ahead of last season&#039;s episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;</p>
<p>it was 16 million. why is that so difficult to figure out? not 15. not whatever. 16! is it not clear? it&#39;s listed right above&#8230;  on this page&#8230; in the original story.</p>
<p>i&#39;m not sure why there are people who don&#39;t like a certain network like abc or a certain show as though they were all ex lovers&#8230;  but there&#39;s nothing bad happening. it was a little low in a post strike, first new episode in 3 months, post tornado storyline world. no need to rejoice the death of a top 5 show or a network based on one episode getting 16 million viewers instead of 18&#8230; especially when DH got 16 million last year and DH got less than 16 in last year&#39;s equivalent episode for next week. plus the dvr numbers will easily put them ahead of last season&#39;s episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9423</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9423</guid>
		<description>@Jon V: That&#039;s awesome news actually. Eli was last pulling off just about 6 million so if it can just retain 500000 of those new viewers, that would be awesome. My only worry is that once again, Eli is being lead-in by a rerun which just really worries me seeing how badly it does without a rerun. Hopefully enough of those new viewers carry over that it doesn&#039;t matter. Also Jon, I&#039;m samosfromhalo on TV.com. I&#039;ve been posting on the boards there for a few weeks. 

Also though, I&#039;d like to know what Robert thinks would be good enough numbers for the finale. Any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon V: That&#8217;s awesome news actually. Eli was last pulling off just about 6 million so if it can just retain 500000 of those new viewers, that would be awesome. My only worry is that once again, Eli is being lead-in by a rerun which just really worries me seeing how badly it does without a rerun. Hopefully enough of those new viewers carry over that it doesn&#8217;t matter. Also Jon, I&#8217;m samosfromhalo on TV.com. I&#8217;ve been posting on the boards there for a few weeks. </p>
<p>Also though, I&#8217;d like to know what Robert thinks would be good enough numbers for the finale. Any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18318</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18318</guid>
		<description>@Jon V: That&#039;s awesome news actually. Eli was last pulling off just about 6 million so if it can just retain 500000 of those new viewers, that would be awesome. My only worry is that once again, Eli is being lead-in by a rerun which just really worries me seeing how badly it does without a rerun. Hopefully enough of those new viewers carry over that it doesn&#039;t matter. Also Jon, I&#039;m samosfromhalo on &lt;a href=&quot;http://TV.com&quot;&gt;TV.com&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;ve been posting on the boards there for a few weeks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also though, I&#039;d like to know what Robert thinks would be good enough numbers for the finale. Any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon V: That&#39;s awesome news actually. Eli was last pulling off just about 6 million so if it can just retain 500000 of those new viewers, that would be awesome. My only worry is that once again, Eli is being lead-in by a rerun which just really worries me seeing how badly it does without a rerun. Hopefully enough of those new viewers carry over that it doesn&#39;t matter. Also Jon, I&#39;m samosfromhalo on <a href="http://TV.com">TV.com</a>. I&#39;ve been posting on the boards there for a few weeks. </p>
<p>Also though, I&#39;d like to know what Robert thinks would be good enough numbers for the finale. Any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9422</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9422</guid>
		<description>Those numbers for DH have to be a disappointment. The first new CSI had over 21 million. DH with 15,16,whatever; the latest Men in Trees with 5.5 If Grey&#039;s can&#039;t beat 17-18 million for its post-strike debut ... Of course he who cuts against the grain is never right until ex post facto and the debate is over. I&#039;ll just continue to watch ABC unravel. They&#039;d be last except - NBC is far worse, almost genetically, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those numbers for DH have to be a disappointment. The first new CSI had over 21 million. DH with 15,16,whatever; the latest Men in Trees with 5.5 If Grey&#8217;s can&#8217;t beat 17-18 million for its post-strike debut &#8230; Of course he who cuts against the grain is never right until ex post facto and the debate is over. I&#8217;ll just continue to watch ABC unravel. They&#8217;d be last except &#8211; NBC is far worse, almost genetically, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>Those numbers for DH have to be a disappointment. The first new CSI had over 21 million. DH with 15,16,whatever; the latest Men in Trees with 5.5 If Grey&#039;s can&#039;t beat 17-18 million for its post-strike debut ... Of course he who cuts against the grain is never right until ex post facto and the debate is over. I&#039;ll just continue to watch ABC unravel. They&#039;d be last except - NBC is far worse, almost genetically, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those numbers for DH have to be a disappointment. The first new CSI had over 21 million. DH with 15,16,whatever; the latest Men in Trees with 5.5 If Grey&#39;s can&#39;t beat 17-18 million for its post-strike debut &#8230; Of course he who cuts against the grain is never right until ex post facto and the debate is over. I&#39;ll just continue to watch ABC unravel. They&#39;d be last except &#8211; NBC is far worse, almost genetically, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9416</guid>
		<description>That should be &quot;Bill&quot;, &quot;Numbers&quot; and it&#039;s a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be &#8220;Bill&#8221;, &#8220;Numbers&#8221; and it&#8217;s a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18316</guid>
		<description>That should be &quot;Bill&quot;, &quot;Numbers&quot; and it&#039;s a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be &#8220;Bill&#8221;, &#8220;Numbers&#8221; and it&#39;s a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9415</guid>
		<description>Hope bill and Robert don&#039;t mind... I&#039;ll put in a link that you can cut/paste to go to this ep&#039;s front page.  But don&#039;t dawdle and make sure you come right back to TVbyTheNubers - the greatest website in the history of the internet.

http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-day/episode/1189314/summary.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=episodessh&amp;tag=episodes;title;0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope bill and Robert don&#8217;t mind&#8230; I&#8217;ll put in a link that you can cut/paste to go to this ep&#8217;s front page.  But don&#8217;t dawdle and make sure you come right back to TVbyTheNubers &#8211; the greatest website in the history of the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-day/episode/1189314/summary.html?om_act=convert&#038;om_clk=episodessh&#038;tag=episodes;title;0" rel="nofollow">http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-day/episode/1189314/summary.html?om_act=convert&#038;om_clk=episodessh&#038;tag=episodes;title;0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18315</guid>
		<description>Hope bill and Robert don&#039;t mind... I&#039;ll put in a link that you can cut/paste to go to this ep&#039;s front page.  But don&#039;t dawdle and make sure you come right back to TVbyTheNubers - the greatest website in the history of the internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-day/episode/1189314/summary.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=episodessh&amp;tag=episodes;title;0&quot;&gt;http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-da...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope bill and Robert don&#39;t mind&#8230; I&#39;ll put in a link that you can cut/paste to go to this ep&#39;s front page.  But don&#39;t dawdle and make sure you come right back to TVbyTheNubers &#8211; the greatest website in the history of the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-day/episode/1189314/summary.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=episodessh&amp;tag=episodes;title;0">http://www.tv.com/eli-stone/waiting-for-that-da&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>Rob - I am on a website (tv.com click my name and search Eli Stone and then click on Waiting for the Day or the discussion links)) where people are going coo-coo for Eli over the past 3 or 4 weeks.  It is not what I would have expected me to like - believe me - it&#039;s just really well-written, well-acted and the characters and actors are very likeable.

The premise shounds kind of smarmy, I know.  But Victor Garber will get two nominations (he&#039;s long overdue) and there will be two or three writing nominations.  There are usually several great scenes per week and I&#039;m assuming there will be a coupla noms out of those, and a coupla episodes have been as good as about any others I&#039;ve seen this year.  So 7, 8, 9 wouldn&#039;t surprise me.

Sam - Eli is in tough this week, I think, but 6.5 mil would be all right against ER and WOT.  I think ABC is not going to worry about this Thurs unless it&#039;s really bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; I am on a website (tv.com click my name and search Eli Stone and then click on Waiting for the Day or the discussion links)) where people are going coo-coo for Eli over the past 3 or 4 weeks.  It is not what I would have expected me to like &#8211; believe me &#8211; it&#8217;s just really well-written, well-acted and the characters and actors are very likeable.</p>
<p>The premise shounds kind of smarmy, I know.  But Victor Garber will get two nominations (he&#8217;s long overdue) and there will be two or three writing nominations.  There are usually several great scenes per week and I&#8217;m assuming there will be a coupla noms out of those, and a coupla episodes have been as good as about any others I&#8217;ve seen this year.  So 7, 8, 9 wouldn&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
<p>Sam &#8211; Eli is in tough this week, I think, but 6.5 mil would be all right against ER and WOT.  I think ABC is not going to worry about this Thurs unless it&#8217;s really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-3/#comment-18314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18314</guid>
		<description>Rob - I am on a website (&lt;a href=&quot;http://tv.com&quot;&gt;tv.com&lt;/a&gt; click my name and search Eli Stone and then click on Waiting for the Day or the discussion links)) where people are going coo-coo for Eli over the past 3 or 4 weeks.  It is not what I would have expected me to like - believe me - it&#039;s just really well-written, well-acted and the characters and actors are very likeable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The premise shounds kind of smarmy, I know.  But Victor Garber will get two nominations (he&#039;s long overdue) and there will be two or three writing nominations.  There are usually several great scenes per week and I&#039;m assuming there will be a coupla noms out of those, and a coupla episodes have been as good as about any others I&#039;ve seen this year.  So 7, 8, 9 wouldn&#039;t surprise me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sam - Eli is in tough this week, I think, but 6.5 mil would be all right against ER and WOT.  I think ABC is not going to worry about this Thurs unless it&#039;s really bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; I am on a website (<a href="http://tv.com">tv.com</a> click my name and search Eli Stone and then click on Waiting for the Day or the discussion links)) where people are going coo-coo for Eli over the past 3 or 4 weeks.  It is not what I would have expected me to like &#8211; believe me &#8211; it&#39;s just really well-written, well-acted and the characters and actors are very likeable.</p>
<p>The premise shounds kind of smarmy, I know.  But Victor Garber will get two nominations (he&#39;s long overdue) and there will be two or three writing nominations.  There are usually several great scenes per week and I&#39;m assuming there will be a coupla noms out of those, and a coupla episodes have been as good as about any others I&#39;ve seen this year.  So 7, 8, 9 wouldn&#39;t surprise me.</p>
<p>Sam &#8211; Eli is in tough this week, I think, but 6.5 mil would be all right against ER and WOT.  I think ABC is not going to worry about this Thurs unless it&#39;s really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9413</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9413</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s awesome news about Eli Stone. What kind of numbers would you say Eli Stone needs to pull off for its finale on Thursday to get renewed? Around this much or can it afford to be between the average and this much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that&#8217;s awesome news about Eli Stone. What kind of numbers would you say Eli Stone needs to pull off for its finale on Thursday to get renewed? Around this much or can it afford to be between the average and this much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18313</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18313</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s awesome news about Eli Stone. What kind of numbers would you say Eli Stone needs to pull off for its finale on Thursday to get renewed? Around this much or can it afford to be between the average and this much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that&#39;s awesome news about Eli Stone. What kind of numbers would you say Eli Stone needs to pull off for its finale on Thursday to get renewed? Around this much or can it afford to be between the average and this much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9411</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9411</guid>
		<description>Are you saying you expect Eli Stone to get 7-10 Emmy nominations?  Seriously?  Nothing against the show....it has its charms.... but it should not be expecting any Emmy attention whatsover in the major categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying you expect Eli Stone to get 7-10 Emmy nominations?  Seriously?  Nothing against the show&#8230;.it has its charms&#8230;. but it should not be expecting any Emmy attention whatsover in the major categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18312</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18312</guid>
		<description>Are you saying you expect Eli Stone to get 7-10 Emmy nominations?  Seriously?  Nothing against the show....it has its charms.... but it should not be expecting any Emmy attention whatsover in the major categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying you expect Eli Stone to get 7-10 Emmy nominations?  Seriously?  Nothing against the show&#8230;.it has its charms&#8230;. but it should not be expecting any Emmy attention whatsover in the major categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9407</guid>
		<description>Oh... and p.s. - that IS why I think Eli will be renewed (ABC with a real vested interest).  That and the fact that I expect 3 or 4 series Emmy nominations and 4 to 6 episode nominations - mainly writing and individual acting performances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; and p.s. &#8211; that IS why I think Eli will be renewed (ABC with a real vested interest).  That and the fact that I expect 3 or 4 series Emmy nominations and 4 to 6 episode nominations &#8211; mainly writing and individual acting performances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18311</guid>
		<description>Oh... and p.s. - that IS why I think Eli will be renewed (ABC with a real vested interest).  That and the fact that I expect 3 or 4 series Emmy nominations and 4 to 6 episode nominations - mainly writing and individual acting performances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; and p.s. &#8211; that IS why I think Eli will be renewed (ABC with a real vested interest).  That and the fact that I expect 3 or 4 series Emmy nominations and 4 to 6 episode nominations &#8211; mainly writing and individual acting performances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9406</guid>
		<description>You make some good points for B&amp;S and BL... but recently, Sunday night has been &#039;go to sleep&#039; night.  The recent Sunday Total Viewers numbers have been abysmal - for all shows.

I wasn&#039;t happy with 9.2mv after 16mv for DHW, but compared to tot/views late on a Sunday the past several weeks, thought it was a pretty good amount. (also, I will be interested in the DVR+ numbers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points for B&amp;S and BL&#8230; but recently, Sunday night has been &#8216;go to sleep&#8217; night.  The recent Sunday Total Viewers numbers have been abysmal &#8211; for all shows.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t happy with 9.2mv after 16mv for DHW, but compared to tot/views late on a Sunday the past several weeks, thought it was a pretty good amount. (also, I will be interested in the DVR+ numbers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18310</guid>
		<description>You make some good points for B&amp;S and BL... but recently, Sunday night has been &#039;go to sleep&#039; night.  The recent Sunday Total Viewers numbers have been abysmal - for all shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wasn&#039;t happy with 9.2mv after 16mv for DHW, but compared to tot/views late on a Sunday the past several weeks, thought it was a pretty good amount. (also, I will be interested in the DVR+ numbers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points for B&amp;S and BL&#8230; but recently, Sunday night has been &#39;go to sleep&#39; night.  The recent Sunday Total Viewers numbers have been abysmal &#8211; for all shows.</p>
<p>I wasn&#39;t happy with 9.2mv after 16mv for DHW, but compared to tot/views late on a Sunday the past several weeks, thought it was a pretty good amount. (also, I will be interested in the DVR+ numbers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9403</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9403</guid>
		<description>jon v...  come on! death slot? post housewives? brothers and sister gets 11-12 million every week. boston leagal last season got a one time shot after housewives and hit almost 14 million. eli might come back since abc owns and it&#039;s good but the show did pretty bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jon v&#8230;  come on! death slot? post housewives? brothers and sister gets 11-12 million every week. boston leagal last season got a one time shot after housewives and hit almost 14 million. eli might come back since abc owns and it&#8217;s good but the show did pretty bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18309</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18309</guid>
		<description>jon v...  come on! death slot? post housewives? brothers and sister gets 11-12 million every week. boston leagal last season got a one time shot after housewives and hit almost 14 million. eli might come back since abc owns and it&#039;s good but the show did pretty bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jon v&#8230;  come on! death slot? post housewives? brothers and sister gets 11-12 million every week. boston leagal last season got a one time shot after housewives and hit almost 14 million. eli might come back since abc owns and it&#39;s good but the show did pretty bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9400</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Master&#039;s Numbers - wish i could bought that on TVBS.

As for DHW-Eli... funny that a new ep of DH (without a natural disaster) didn&#039;t match up to the new ep WITH a natural disaster at the end of the &#039;season&#039;, while Eli (WITH a natural disaster - earthquake) had it&#039;s most viewers ever.  So, therefore, Natural Disaster = increased viewers... right?

Also, Eli WILL be back.  ABC isn&#039;t wasting this golden opportunity  (behind DHW) for nothing and, even though it didn&#039;t hold as good a % of Desperate as I would have liked, 9.19 (not including DVR+) is a pretty good number for 10pm on a SUNDAY night (one of the death slots).  The DVR+ on Eli might set a % increase record (if there is one) because that&#039;s exactly when people are packing it in early to start out there Monday morning work week.

Whew... I&#039;m tired.  Later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Master&#8217;s Numbers &#8211; wish i could bought that on TVBS.</p>
<p>As for DHW-Eli&#8230; funny that a new ep of DH (without a natural disaster) didn&#8217;t match up to the new ep WITH a natural disaster at the end of the &#8216;season&#8217;, while Eli (WITH a natural disaster &#8211; earthquake) had it&#8217;s most viewers ever.  So, therefore, Natural Disaster = increased viewers&#8230; right?</p>
<p>Also, Eli WILL be back.  ABC isn&#8217;t wasting this golden opportunity  (behind DHW) for nothing and, even though it didn&#8217;t hold as good a % of Desperate as I would have liked, 9.19 (not including DVR+) is a pretty good number for 10pm on a SUNDAY night (one of the death slots).  The DVR+ on Eli might set a % increase record (if there is one) because that&#8217;s exactly when people are packing it in early to start out there Monday morning work week.</p>
<p>Whew&#8230; I&#8217;m tired.  Later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18308</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Master&#039;s Numbers - wish i could bought that on TVBS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for DHW-Eli... funny that a new ep of DH (without a natural disaster) didn&#039;t match up to the new ep WITH a natural disaster at the end of the &#039;season&#039;, while Eli (WITH a natural disaster - earthquake) had it&#039;s most viewers ever.  So, therefore, Natural Disaster = increased viewers... right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Eli WILL be back.  ABC isn&#039;t wasting this golden opportunity  (behind DHW) for nothing and, even though it didn&#039;t hold as good a % of Desperate as I would have liked, 9.19 (not including DVR+) is a pretty good number for 10pm on a SUNDAY night (one of the death slots).  The DVR+ on Eli might set a % increase record (if there is one) because that&#039;s exactly when people are packing it in early to start out there Monday morning work week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whew... I&#039;m tired.  Later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Master&#39;s Numbers &#8211; wish i could bought that on TVBS.</p>
<p>As for DHW-Eli&#8230; funny that a new ep of DH (without a natural disaster) didn&#39;t match up to the new ep WITH a natural disaster at the end of the &#39;season&#39;, while Eli (WITH a natural disaster &#8211; earthquake) had it&#39;s most viewers ever.  So, therefore, Natural Disaster = increased viewers&#8230; right?</p>
<p>Also, Eli WILL be back.  ABC isn&#39;t wasting this golden opportunity  (behind DHW) for nothing and, even though it didn&#39;t hold as good a % of Desperate as I would have liked, 9.19 (not including DVR+) is a pretty good number for 10pm on a SUNDAY night (one of the death slots).  The DVR+ on Eli might set a % increase record (if there is one) because that&#39;s exactly when people are packing it in early to start out there Monday morning work week.</p>
<p>Whew&#8230; I&#39;m tired.  Later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.H.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9399</link>
		<dc:creator>E.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9399</guid>
		<description>The simple fact is that people dont remember about these brand new episodes because the writer&#039;s strike lasted so long. I think the numbers for DH are pretty good considering that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple fact is that people dont remember about these brand new episodes because the writer&#8217;s strike lasted so long. I think the numbers for DH are pretty good considering that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.H.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18307</link>
		<dc:creator>E.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18307</guid>
		<description>The simple fact is that people dont remember about these brand new episodes because the writer&#039;s strike lasted so long. I think the numbers for DH are pretty good considering that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simple fact is that people dont remember about these brand new episodes because the writer&#39;s strike lasted so long. I think the numbers for DH are pretty good considering that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9397</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9397</guid>
		<description>I am sure that Golf helped Big Brother in the ratings but that is a huge jump compared to previous weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that Golf helped Big Brother in the ratings but that is a huge jump compared to previous weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>I am sure that Golf helped Big Brother in the ratings but that is a huge jump compared to previous weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that Golf helped Big Brother in the ratings but that is a huge jump compared to previous weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9393</guid>
		<description>Browng, because of the overrun and the way the data was published I&#039;m not comfortable comparing until I see the final numbers, but,it looks poised to be *well* ahead of last week&#039;s 6.2ish million and the week before&#039;s 7.5 millionish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browng, because of the overrun and the way the data was published I&#8217;m not comfortable comparing until I see the final numbers, but,it looks poised to be *well* ahead of last week&#8217;s 6.2ish million and the week before&#8217;s 7.5 millionish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>Browng, because of the overrun and the way the data was published I&#039;m not comfortable comparing until I see the final numbers, but,it looks poised to be *well* ahead of last week&#039;s 6.2ish million and the week before&#039;s 7.5 millionish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browng, because of the overrun and the way the data was published I&#39;m not comfortable comparing until I see the final numbers, but,it looks poised to be *well* ahead of last week&#39;s 6.2ish million and the week before&#39;s 7.5 millionish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browngloster</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator>Browngloster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9392</guid>
		<description>Dear Robert

Call me crazy but it appears that my favorite reality show picked up this Sunday (in the ratings)...Is that correct? Was Big Brother up in the ratings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Robert</p>
<p>Call me crazy but it appears that my favorite reality show picked up this Sunday (in the ratings)&#8230;Is that correct? Was Big Brother up in the ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browngloster</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-2/#comment-18304</link>
		<dc:creator>Browngloster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18304</guid>
		<description>Dear Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call me crazy but it appears that my favorite reality show picked up this Sunday (in the ratings)...Is that correct? Was Big Brother up in the ratings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Robert</p>
<p>Call me crazy but it appears that my favorite reality show picked up this Sunday (in the ratings)&#8230;Is that correct? Was Big Brother up in the ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-1/#comment-9389</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-9389</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no doubt the long break (3+ months) hurt -- and it will be interesting to see if it was the highest DVR viewed episode ever.

@Dearme.  I can&#039;t say where the all went, but in very round numbers, during the 9pm hour, of the TVs turned on, only about 1/3rd of them were watching the 5 networks listed above. The rest were spread among cable or other local channels. In other words of all the people watching TV at 9pm, roughly 2/3rds weren&#039;t watching broadcast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt the long break (3+ months) hurt &#8212; and it will be interesting to see if it was the highest DVR viewed episode ever.</p>
<p>@Dearme.  I can&#8217;t say where the all went, but in very round numbers, during the 9pm hour, of the TVs turned on, only about 1/3rd of them were watching the 5 networks listed above. The rest were spread among cable or other local channels. In other words of all the people watching TV at 9pm, roughly 2/3rds weren&#8217;t watching broadcast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317/comment-page-1/#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/14/nielsen-ratings-apr-13-housewives-were-back-but-ratings-look-desperate/3317#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no doubt the long break (3+ months) hurt -- and it will be interesting to see if it was the highest DVR viewed episode ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Dearme.  I can&#039;t say where the all went, but in very round numbers, during the 9pm hour, of the TVs turned on, only about 1/3rd of them were watching the 5 networks listed above. The rest were spread among cable or other local channels. In other words of all the people watching TV at 9pm, roughly 2/3rds weren&#039;t watching broadcast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no doubt the long break (3+ months) hurt &#8212; and it will be interesting to see if it was the highest DVR viewed episode ever.</p>
<p>@Dearme.  I can&#39;t say where the all went, but in very round numbers, during the 9pm hour, of the TVs turned on, only about 1/3rd of them were watching the 5 networks listed above. The rest were spread among cable or other local channels. In other words of all the people watching TV at 9pm, roughly 2/3rds weren&#39;t watching broadcast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

