<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings for May 1: Where Are The TV Viewers Going?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-11540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11540</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. 

1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#8217;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#8217;d program, where it&#8217;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#8217;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#39;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#39;d program, where it&#39;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#39;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-11539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11539</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. 

1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 
11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#8217;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#8217;d program, where it&#8217;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#8217;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998<br />
11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 &lt;br&gt;11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#39;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#39;d program, where it&#39;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#39;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 <br />11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-11521</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11521</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, I&#039;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, I&#8217;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-6/#comment-16271</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16271</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, I&#039;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, I&#39;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11488</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11488</guid>
		<description>Zach a couple of week&#039;s ago was the ideal situation -- it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#039;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#039;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach a couple of week&#8217;s ago was the ideal situation &#8212; it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#8217;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#8217;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16270</guid>
		<description>Zach a couple of week&#039;s ago was the ideal situation -- it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#039;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#039;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach a couple of week&#39;s ago was the ideal situation &#8212; it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#39;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#39;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11485</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11485</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10... :(  Oh well... still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now... they would never cancel it ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Oh well&#8230; still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now&#8230; they would never cancel it ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16269</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16269</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10... :(  Oh well... still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now... they would never cancel it ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Oh well&#8230; still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now&#8230; they would never cancel it ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11455</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11455</guid>
		<description>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. 

I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. </p>
<p>I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. </p>
<p>I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11448</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11448</guid>
		<description>I liked Supernatural last night.

The numbers are surprising. If they don&#039;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#039;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#039;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#039;Supernatural&#039;.

I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#039;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#039;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Supernatural last night.</p>
<p>The numbers are surprising. If they don&#8217;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#8217;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#8217;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#8216;Supernatural&#8217;.</p>
<p>I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#8217;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#8217;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16267</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16267</guid>
		<description>I liked Supernatural last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The numbers are surprising. If they don&#039;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#039;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#039;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#039;Supernatural&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#039;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#039;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Supernatural last night.</p>
<p>The numbers are surprising. If they don&#39;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#39;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#39;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#39;Supernatural&#39;.</p>
<p>I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#39;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#39;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11445</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11445</guid>
		<description>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16266</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16266</guid>
		<description>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11433</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11433</guid>
		<description>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#039;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#039;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#039;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.

I think Lost&#039;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#039;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#039;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#039;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#039;s space to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#8217;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#8217;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#8217;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.</p>
<p>I think Lost&#8217;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#8217;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#8217;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#8217;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#8217;s space to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16265</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16265</guid>
		<description>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#039;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#039;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#039;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Lost&#039;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#039;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#039;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#039;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#039;s space to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#39;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#39;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#39;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.</p>
<p>I think Lost&#39;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#39;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#39;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#39;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#39;s space to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11430</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11430</guid>
		<description>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.

I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.</p>
<p>I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16264</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16264</guid>
		<description>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.</p>
<p>I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11426</guid>
		<description>Cookson... i like your attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookson&#8230; i like your attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16263</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16263</guid>
		<description>Cookson... i like your attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookson&#8230; i like your attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11425</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11425</guid>
		<description>With LOST, obviously it&#039;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &quot;even&quot;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#039;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.

Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group....which LOST is always high on.

Every thing&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With LOST, obviously it&#8217;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &#8220;even&#8221;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#8217;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.</p>
<p>Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group&#8230;.which LOST is always high on.</p>
<p>Every thing&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16262</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16262</guid>
		<description>With LOST, obviously it&#039;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &quot;even&quot;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#039;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group....which LOST is always high on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every thing&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With LOST, obviously it&#39;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &#8220;even&#8221;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#39;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.</p>
<p>Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group&#8230;.which LOST is always high on.</p>
<p>Every thing&#39;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-11421</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11421</guid>
		<description>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-5/#comment-16261</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16261</guid>
		<description>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11420</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11420</guid>
		<description>These Supernatural numbers really have me worried. I hope there&#039;s no chance that the CW would pull their renewal of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Supernatural numbers really have me worried. I hope there&#8217;s no chance that the CW would pull their renewal of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16260</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16260</guid>
		<description>These Supernatural numbers really have me worried. I hope there&#039;s no chance that the CW would pull their renewal of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Supernatural numbers really have me worried. I hope there&#39;s no chance that the CW would pull their renewal of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11408</link>
		<dc:creator>hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11408</guid>
		<description>you see. everything on TV is down. meaning, idol is still doing amazing. please no more negative idol articles. and i wish everyone would leave poor paula alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you see. everything on TV is down. meaning, idol is still doing amazing. please no more negative idol articles. and i wish everyone would leave poor paula alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16259</link>
		<dc:creator>hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16259</guid>
		<description>you see. everything on TV is down. meaning, idol is still doing amazing. please no more negative idol articles. and i wish everyone would leave poor paula alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you see. everything on TV is down. meaning, idol is still doing amazing. please no more negative idol articles. and i wish everyone would leave poor paula alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11403</guid>
		<description>It looks like the 8:00-8:30 slot averaged about 39 million viewers, but then at 9:00 suddenly there were 50 mil/view.

This might be in line with some of the sports that was going on elsewhere early.

An increase of 11 mil/view prob has also Daylight and quality of programming as the cause as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the 8:00-8:30 slot averaged about 39 million viewers, but then at 9:00 suddenly there were 50 mil/view.</p>
<p>This might be in line with some of the sports that was going on elsewhere early.</p>
<p>An increase of 11 mil/view prob has also Daylight and quality of programming as the cause as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16258</guid>
		<description>It looks like the 8:00-8:30 slot averaged about 39 million viewers, but then at 9:00 suddenly there were 50 mil/view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This might be in line with some of the sports that was going on elsewhere early.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An increase of 11 mil/view prob has also Daylight and quality of programming as the cause as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the 8:00-8:30 slot averaged about 39 million viewers, but then at 9:00 suddenly there were 50 mil/view.</p>
<p>This might be in line with some of the sports that was going on elsewhere early.</p>
<p>An increase of 11 mil/view prob has also Daylight and quality of programming as the cause as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xnova45</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11402</link>
		<dc:creator>Xnova45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11402</guid>
		<description>They already renewed supernatural for a 4th season 
http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Supernatural-Season-Four-Confirmed/Page1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already renewed supernatural for a 4th season<br />
<a href="http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Supernatural-Season-Four-Confirmed/Page1.html" rel="nofollow">http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Supernatural-Season-Four-Confirmed/Page1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xnova45</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16257</link>
		<dc:creator>Xnova45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16257</guid>
		<description>They already renewed supernatural for a 4th season &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Supernatural-Season-Four-Confirmed/Page1.html&quot;&gt;http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Superna...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already renewed supernatural for a 4th season <br /><a href="http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Supernatural-Season-Four-Confirmed/Page1.html">http://firefox.org/news/articles/1262/1/Superna&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11400</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11400</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the shout out in the main post.
I agree with Angie too, people may just not have known supernatural was back; I have a feeling a lot of supernatural viewers only watch the CW when supernatural is on, and missed any promotion of a new episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the shout out in the main post.<br />
I agree with Angie too, people may just not have known supernatural was back; I have a feeling a lot of supernatural viewers only watch the CW when supernatural is on, and missed any promotion of a new episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16256</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16256</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the shout out in the main post.&lt;br&gt;I agree with Angie too, people may just not have known supernatural was back; I have a feeling a lot of supernatural viewers only watch the CW when supernatural is on, and missed any promotion of a new episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the shout out in the main post.<br />I agree with Angie too, people may just not have known supernatural was back; I have a feeling a lot of supernatural viewers only watch the CW when supernatural is on, and missed any promotion of a new episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11398</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11398</guid>
		<description>Angie,

I agree with you.  I think the CW pulling the show off the air in place of Reaper confused people who dodn&#039;t know about the show even returning, and many people I&#039;ve talked to didn&#039;t even know it was coming back on because they thought JiB was the season finale...I didn&#039;t mind GF, but probably not the best episode to air after coming back from a 2 month long break...thank goodness the show has already been renewed for a 4th season...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie,</p>
<p>I agree with you.  I think the CW pulling the show off the air in place of Reaper confused people who dodn&#8217;t know about the show even returning, and many people I&#8217;ve talked to didn&#8217;t even know it was coming back on because they thought JiB was the season finale&#8230;I didn&#8217;t mind GF, but probably not the best episode to air after coming back from a 2 month long break&#8230;thank goodness the show has already been renewed for a 4th season&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16255</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16255</guid>
		<description>Angie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you.  I think the CW pulling the show off the air in place of Reaper confused people who dodn&#039;t know about the show even returning, and many people I&#039;ve talked to didn&#039;t even know it was coming back on because they thought JiB was the season finale...I didn&#039;t mind GF, but probably not the best episode to air after coming back from a 2 month long break...thank goodness the show has already been renewed for a 4th season...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie,</p>
<p>I agree with you.  I think the CW pulling the show off the air in place of Reaper confused people who dodn&#39;t know about the show even returning, and many people I&#39;ve talked to didn&#39;t even know it was coming back on because they thought JiB was the season finale&#8230;I didn&#39;t mind GF, but probably not the best episode to air after coming back from a 2 month long break&#8230;thank goodness the show has already been renewed for a 4th season&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11396</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11396</guid>
		<description>Robert - Thanks for mentioning the link, I had already read it.  I want to thank both you and Bill for providing so many good links.  There are quite a few I would have missed if not for your site. :)

Tom - thanks for clarifying and your snarky comment was funny! ;)  (I really hope your right about viewers comming back in the fall.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; Thanks for mentioning the link, I had already read it.  I want to thank both you and Bill for providing so many good links.  There are quite a few I would have missed if not for your site. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tom &#8211; thanks for clarifying and your snarky comment was funny! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   (I really hope your right about viewers comming back in the fall.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16254</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16254</guid>
		<description>Robert - Thanks for mentioning the link, I had already read it.  I want to thank both you and Bill for providing so many good links.  There are quite a few I would have missed if not for your site. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tom - thanks for clarifying and your snarky comment was funny! ;)  (I really hope your right about viewers comming back in the fall.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; Thanks for mentioning the link, I had already read it.  I want to thank both you and Bill for providing so many good links.  There are quite a few I would have missed if not for your site. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tom &#8211; thanks for clarifying and your snarky comment was funny! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   (I really hope your right about viewers comming back in the fall.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>i know polly...  i just found the image funny of someone discovering cable. i agree with your assessment. i watch less. used to watch daily show and other stuff every night. got out of the habit. i think some will come back in the fall. sort of fresh start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know polly&#8230;  i just found the image funny of someone discovering cable. i agree with your assessment. i watch less. used to watch daily show and other stuff every night. got out of the habit. i think some will come back in the fall. sort of fresh start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16253</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16253</guid>
		<description>i know polly...  i just found the image funny of someone discovering cable. i agree with your assessment. i watch less. used to watch daily show and other stuff every night. got out of the habit. i think some will come back in the fall. sort of fresh start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know polly&#8230;  i just found the image funny of someone discovering cable. i agree with your assessment. i watch less. used to watch daily show and other stuff every night. got out of the habit. i think some will come back in the fall. sort of fresh start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11393</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11393</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve watched Scrubs for years, but I think NBC did the right thing and ABC won&#039;t get much benefit out of the move. The show is played out and just not as funny as it once was, and I think many of its fans recognize that. When it switches networks, it will naturally lose some viewers because it will be moving to a different night and different station, and will not be surrounded by other, more popular shows, such as The Office. And considering Scrubs was never that great at retaining the audience of hit shows it aired after--it didn&#039;t exactly become a smash hit when it aired after Friends--I can&#039;t see it helping to create a hit on ABC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve watched Scrubs for years, but I think NBC did the right thing and ABC won&#8217;t get much benefit out of the move. The show is played out and just not as funny as it once was, and I think many of its fans recognize that. When it switches networks, it will naturally lose some viewers because it will be moving to a different night and different station, and will not be surrounded by other, more popular shows, such as The Office. And considering Scrubs was never that great at retaining the audience of hit shows it aired after&#8211;it didn&#8217;t exactly become a smash hit when it aired after Friends&#8211;I can&#8217;t see it helping to create a hit on ABC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16252</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve watched Scrubs for years, but I think NBC did the right thing and ABC won&#039;t get much benefit out of the move. The show is played out and just not as funny as it once was, and I think many of its fans recognize that. When it switches networks, it will naturally lose some viewers because it will be moving to a different night and different station, and will not be surrounded by other, more popular shows, such as The Office. And considering Scrubs was never that great at retaining the audience of hit shows it aired after--it didn&#039;t exactly become a smash hit when it aired after Friends--I can&#039;t see it helping to create a hit on ABC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve watched Scrubs for years, but I think NBC did the right thing and ABC won&#39;t get much benefit out of the move. The show is played out and just not as funny as it once was, and I think many of its fans recognize that. When it switches networks, it will naturally lose some viewers because it will be moving to a different night and different station, and will not be surrounded by other, more popular shows, such as The Office. And considering Scrubs was never that great at retaining the audience of hit shows it aired after&#8211;it didn&#39;t exactly become a smash hit when it aired after Friends&#8211;I can&#39;t see it helping to create a hit on ABC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-11391</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11391</guid>
		<description>Angie/Polly -- there are stories floating around how scripted dramas have been hit hardest by the strike.  Both Bill and I have linked to them but one one of the stories is at top of Bill&#039;s link list (under &quot;Gorman Reading&quot; on the right hand side).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie/Polly &#8212; there are stories floating around how scripted dramas have been hit hardest by the strike.  Both Bill and I have linked to them but one one of the stories is at top of Bill&#8217;s link list (under &#8220;Gorman Reading&#8221; on the right hand side).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-4/#comment-16251</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16251</guid>
		<description>Angie/Polly -- there are stories floating around how scripted dramas have been hit hardest by the strike.  Both Bill and I have linked to them but one one of the stories is at top of Bill&#039;s link list (under &quot;Gorman Reading&quot; on the right hand side).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie/Polly &#8212; there are stories floating around how scripted dramas have been hit hardest by the strike.  Both Bill and I have linked to them but one one of the stories is at top of Bill&#39;s link list (under &#8220;Gorman Reading&#8221; on the right hand side).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-3/#comment-11390</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11390</guid>
		<description>I should have added earlier that the viewing patterns I&#039;m talking about also include other avenues of viewing not just cable i.e. the internet, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have added earlier that the viewing patterns I&#8217;m talking about also include other avenues of viewing not just cable i.e. the internet, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-3/#comment-16250</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16250</guid>
		<description>I should have added earlier that the viewing patterns I&#039;m talking about also include other avenues of viewing not just cable i.e. the internet, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have added earlier that the viewing patterns I&#39;m talking about also include other avenues of viewing not just cable i.e. the internet, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-3/#comment-11389</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11389</guid>
		<description>Tom - I guess I should have made my point more clearly.  I meant they discovered things that they enjoyed the same as or more on cable. Not that they discovered that they had cable. I just think the strike changed up viewing patterns and I don&#039;t think they are going to go back to what they were pre-strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; I guess I should have made my point more clearly.  I meant they discovered things that they enjoyed the same as or more on cable. Not that they discovered that they had cable. I just think the strike changed up viewing patterns and I don&#8217;t think they are going to go back to what they were pre-strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/comment-page-3/#comment-16249</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16249</guid>
		<description>Tom - I guess I should have made my point more clearly.  I meant they discovered things that they enjoyed the same as or more on cable. Not that they discovered that they had cable. I just think the strike changed up viewing patterns and I don&#039;t think they are going to go back to what they were pre-strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; I guess I should have made my point more clearly.  I meant they discovered things that they enjoyed the same as or more on cable. Not that they discovered that they had cable. I just think the strike changed up viewing patterns and I don&#39;t think they are going to go back to what they were pre-strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

