<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CW 2008 Fall Schedule vs. 2007 Fall Schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Dee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-21943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-21943</guid>
		<description>It would be a smart move for the CW to keep the &quot;The Game&quot; on air. Especially w/Football season starting. I love that show and I know several others who love it too! Please don&#039;t take it off the air!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a smart move for the CW to keep the &#8220;The Game&#8221; on air. Especially w/Football season starting. I love that show and I know several others who love it too! Please don&#8217;t take it off the air!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-21631</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-21631</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait for Supernatural and The Reaper to come back! It&#039;s a welcome break from reality TV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for Supernatural and The Reaper to come back! It&#8217;s a welcome break from reality TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-257941</link>
		<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-257941</guid>
		<description>yes reaper is the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes reaper is the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micheal</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-257942</link>
		<dc:creator>micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-257942</guid>
		<description>reaper is the best show ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reaper is the best show ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-21276</link>
		<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-21276</guid>
		<description>yes reaper is the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes reaper is the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micheal</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-21275</link>
		<dc:creator>micheal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-21275</guid>
		<description>reaper is the best show ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reaper is the best show ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-14535</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-14535</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I guess the only two scripted diverse shows they have EBHC and The Game will become phased out after this season since they keep moving its days.  First they started out on Mondays, then Sundays, now Fridays when hardly anyone really watches television.  I think that both are really good shows.  The Game has relationship issues that most adults have gone through or knows someone who went through the issues.  I guess CW stands for Child&#039;s World because the majority of their shows are for people 21 and under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I guess the only two scripted diverse shows they have EBHC and The Game will become phased out after this season since they keep moving its days.  First they started out on Mondays, then Sundays, now Fridays when hardly anyone really watches television.  I think that both are really good shows.  The Game has relationship issues that most adults have gone through or knows someone who went through the issues.  I guess CW stands for Child&#39;s World because the majority of their shows are for people 21 and under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichole</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-13080</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-13080</guid>
		<description>I am just glad that Supernatural is coming back.  I only watch Thursday on the CW but I might check out the 90210 since I loved the early years of the orginal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just glad that Supernatural is coming back.  I only watch Thursday on the CW but I might check out the 90210 since I loved the early years of the orginal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marissa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-302805</link>
		<dc:creator>Marissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-302805</guid>
		<description>I agree...90210 should definitely be paired with GG

Don&#039;t think the filthy rich show will be succesful

In the end, Gossip Girl is the only show I watch on CW anyways and I just hope GG can continue to be by far the msot buzzed about show that it has a good chance of moving to another network for third season if CW goes under...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;90210 should definitely be paired with GG</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think the filthy rich show will be succesful</p>
<p>In the end, Gossip Girl is the only show I watch on CW anyways and I just hope GG can continue to be by far the msot buzzed about show that it has a good chance of moving to another network for third season if CW goes under&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-13079</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-13079</guid>
		<description>i agree they should pick up moonlight!!! totally worth it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree they should pick up moonlight!!! totally worth it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steinmiller</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-13078</link>
		<dc:creator>Steinmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-13078</guid>
		<description>Veronica Mars, and now Aliens in America.. This is why I hate The CW/WB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veronica Mars, and now Aliens in America.. This is why I hate The CW/WB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301604</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301604</guid>
		<description>I really wish they would move Supernatural to Tuesday nights again but I guess it goes well with Smallville.  I&#039;ll be happy if the show makes it to the five seasons Kripke wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish they would move Supernatural to Tuesday nights again but I guess it goes well with Smallville.  I&#8217;ll be happy if the show makes it to the five seasons Kripke wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301603</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301603</guid>
		<description>I really wish they would move Supernatural to Tuesday nights again but I guess it goes well with Smallville.  I&#039;ll be happy if the show makes it to the five seasons Kripke wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish they would move Supernatural to Tuesday nights again but I guess it goes well with Smallville.  I&#8217;ll be happy if the show makes it to the five seasons Kripke wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alyssa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301585</link>
		<dc:creator>alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301585</guid>
		<description>Hey CW, why don&#039;t you pick up Moonlight, it would go great with your Sci Fi schedule. And it already has a following of 8 million viewers. Hey it couldn&#039;t hurt.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CW, why don&#8217;t you pick up Moonlight, it would go great with your Sci Fi schedule. And it already has a following of 8 million viewers. Hey it couldn&#8217;t hurt&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301564</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301564</guid>
		<description>&quot;... its hard to imagine they’ll do worse next season.&quot;

Not too hard for me. They&#039;ve lost Smackdown, and no way are EHC and The Game going to pull in numbers anywhere close to what it did.

It&#039;s reasonable to assume that GG&#039;s, OTH&#039;s, and Reaper&#039;s ratings will continue at their current pathetic levels.

It&#039;s also reasonable to assume that 90210 and STFR will, at best, get those same kind of ratings.

In its first two season, at least one of the CW&#039;s new shows has been a disaster right out of the gate. Runaway in their first season. Life Is Wild and Aliens In America in their second season. I bet this trend will continue and I&#039;m putting my money on STFR.

And finally, Smallville is way past its expiration date. The absence of most of the cast next season should pretty much do it in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; its hard to imagine they’ll do worse next season.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not too hard for me. They&#8217;ve lost Smackdown, and no way are EHC and The Game going to pull in numbers anywhere close to what it did.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s reasonable to assume that GG&#8217;s, OTH&#8217;s, and Reaper&#8217;s ratings will continue at their current pathetic levels.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also reasonable to assume that 90210 and STFR will, at best, get those same kind of ratings.</p>
<p>In its first two season, at least one of the CW&#8217;s new shows has been a disaster right out of the gate. Runaway in their first season. Life Is Wild and Aliens In America in their second season. I bet this trend will continue and I&#8217;m putting my money on STFR.</p>
<p>And finally, Smallville is way past its expiration date. The absence of most of the cast next season should pretty much do it in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301545</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301545</guid>
		<description>The short answer is this: I have absolutely no idea!   But otherwise, heck, I&#039;d LOVE to see a Sunday night lineup of Jericho AND Moonlight because its fans are very active on the Internet! I&#039;m hampered by not knowing what MRC&#039;s objectives are.  Are they, like the CW targeting youthful markets? If so, both Moonlight and Jericho are no deals, regardless of cost.  

Also, I have no idea what MRC&#039;s budget for shows is.  I&#039;ve heard Moonlight wasn&#039;t among the most expensive dramas to produce, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not coming in a lot more expensive than what MRC is looking to pay.  I&#039;m skeptical about this happening, but hope is hope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is this: I have absolutely no idea!   But otherwise, heck, I&#8217;d LOVE to see a Sunday night lineup of Jericho AND Moonlight because its fans are very active on the Internet! I&#8217;m hampered by not knowing what MRC&#8217;s objectives are.  Are they, like the CW targeting youthful markets? If so, both Moonlight and Jericho are no deals, regardless of cost.  </p>
<p>Also, I have no idea what MRC&#8217;s budget for shows is.  I&#8217;ve heard Moonlight wasn&#8217;t among the most expensive dramas to produce, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not coming in a lot more expensive than what MRC is looking to pay.  I&#8217;m skeptical about this happening, but hope is hope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301544</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301544</guid>
		<description>The latest rumblings are that the folks who secured the Sunday night CW slot might pick up Moonlight.  What&#039;s your thoughts on this?  I understand it isn&#039;t in all markets.  Just how much less saturation does it have than CBS?

I&#039;ve never watched a show on CW but if Moonlight moves over there, I&#039;m completely game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest rumblings are that the folks who secured the Sunday night CW slot might pick up Moonlight.  What&#8217;s your thoughts on this?  I understand it isn&#8217;t in all markets.  Just how much less saturation does it have than CBS?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never watched a show on CW but if Moonlight moves over there, I&#8217;m completely game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Yanan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301542</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Yanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301542</guid>
		<description>on the contrary, i think, on paper, this schedule does a much better job targeting young women than the 2007 schedule did.  b&amp;tg was always more evenly skewed than other cw shows (certainly more males watch it compared to antm) and i suspect stylist, especially airing out of top model, will be more W18-34 skewed.  90210 leading into filthy rich is questionable to me... 90210 will open big, but from the script, i just don&#039;t find anything remarkable about filthy rich.  it&#039;s a shrug for me.  if sunday isn&#039;t counted in cw&#039;s ratings (i suspect it will be, as there will be national advertisements), then the average will definitely rise because sunday has been cw&#039;s weakest night.  friday, from a W18-34 perspective, probably won&#039;t be so much worse than this season with the wwe.  form a total audience and other demo perspective... disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the contrary, i think, on paper, this schedule does a much better job targeting young women than the 2007 schedule did.  b&amp;tg was always more evenly skewed than other cw shows (certainly more males watch it compared to antm) and i suspect stylist, especially airing out of top model, will be more W18-34 skewed.  90210 leading into filthy rich is questionable to me&#8230; 90210 will open big, but from the script, i just don&#8217;t find anything remarkable about filthy rich.  it&#8217;s a shrug for me.  if sunday isn&#8217;t counted in cw&#8217;s ratings (i suspect it will be, as there will be national advertisements), then the average will definitely rise because sunday has been cw&#8217;s weakest night.  friday, from a W18-34 perspective, probably won&#8217;t be so much worse than this season with the wwe.  form a total audience and other demo perspective&#8230; disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-13077</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-13077</guid>
		<description>90210 is the only smart move here. brand recognition will get some to sample.  They should have paired it with gossip girl. 90210 fans of yore would probably get a kick out of gossip girl and now they will probably never see the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stylista and Rich girls? Not going to be hits but by CW low standards; may survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90210 is the only smart move here. brand recognition will get some to sample.  They should have paired it with gossip girl. 90210 fans of yore would probably get a kick out of gossip girl and now they will probably never see the show.</p>
<p>Stylista and Rich girls? Not going to be hits but by CW low standards; may survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762/comment-page-1/#comment-301539</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/cw-2008-fall-schedule-vs-2007-fall-schedule/3762#comment-301539</guid>
		<description>Ha. They still managed to find a way to use a Top Model repeat. 

So I see them pimping 90210 out the way they did Gossip Girl this season and then it will bomb even worse. Tuesday will hardly even show up on the radar.

Do you think we&#039;ll still get ratings for Sundays, even though it&#039;s a 3rd party programming it? I was wondering if they may end up doing better than CW has ever been able to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. They still managed to find a way to use a Top Model repeat. </p>
<p>So I see them pimping 90210 out the way they did Gossip Girl this season and then it will bomb even worse. Tuesday will hardly even show up on the radar.</p>
<p>Do you think we&#8217;ll still get ratings for Sundays, even though it&#8217;s a 3rd party programming it? I was wondering if they may end up doing better than CW has ever been able to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

