<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top CBS Primetime Shows, May 5-11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pipestr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-258092</link>
		<dc:creator>Pipestr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-258092</guid>
		<description>18 - 49 ................... in other words - leave out all the boomers, who have their kids raised and gone, bills under control, and have the most wealth, and therefore disposable income. Altho, I would imagine that it also excludes the grandkids of the boomers - that we love to lavish with presents........&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People that can afford high ticket items, and not have to choose between diapers, and gourmet potato chips ........................ yea - theres a market thqat should be ignored ... what a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 &#8211; 49 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. in other words &#8211; leave out all the boomers, who have their kids raised and gone, bills under control, and have the most wealth, and therefore disposable income. Altho, I would imagine that it also excludes the grandkids of the boomers &#8211; that we love to lavish with presents&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>People that can afford high ticket items, and not have to choose between diapers, and gourmet potato chips &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; yea &#8211; theres a market thqat should be ignored &#8230; what a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pipestr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-14289</link>
		<dc:creator>Pipestr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-14289</guid>
		<description>18 - 49 ................... in other words - leave out all the boomers, who have their kids raised and gone, bills under control, and have the most wealth, and therefore disposable income. Altho, I would imagine that it also excludes the grandkids of the boomers - that we love to lavish with presents........&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People that can afford high ticket items, and not have to choose between diapers, and gourmet potato chips ........................ yea - theres a market thqat should be ignored ... what a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 &#8211; 49 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. in other words &#8211; leave out all the boomers, who have their kids raised and gone, bills under control, and have the most wealth, and therefore disposable income. Altho, I would imagine that it also excludes the grandkids of the boomers &#8211; that we love to lavish with presents&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>People that can afford high ticket items, and not have to choose between diapers, and gourmet potato chips &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; yea &#8211; theres a market thqat should be ignored &#8230; what a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302246</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302246</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302245</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302245</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302244</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302244</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302243</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302243</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302242</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302242</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-302241</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-302241</guid>
		<description>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#039;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  

The rest of the viewers don&#039;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 - 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That just proves that the 18-49 demo has no taste in shows.  I would venture to guess that it is the younger crowd that represents the bulk of that group.  They don&#8217;t have the bucks to buy what the sponsors peddle so it surprised me that the networks and sponsors pander to them.  </p>
<p>The rest of the viewers don&#8217;t seem to count even though the older crowd hold the purse strings and can buy the merchandise the advertisers peddle. Since the baby boom crowd is such a large group now, perhaps the networks and sponsors should revisit their research and start considering what the older crowd might like to watch. Perhaps a better cut would be 30 &#8211; 60 demo.  It might help to improve on the crap that is shown on TV and give them a better chance against the cable networks (which is the haven of sanity for many of us older folks!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-301755</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-301755</guid>
		<description>The Big Bang Theory did much better in the 18-49 demo. even with fewer viewers it had a 2.8 vs. Moonlight&#039;s 1.9, or almost 50% better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Bang Theory did much better in the 18-49 demo. even with fewer viewers it had a 2.8 vs. Moonlight&#8217;s 1.9, or almost 50% better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738/comment-page-1/#comment-14288</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/13/top-cbs-primetime-shows-may-5-11/3738#comment-14288</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, The Big Bang Theory did worse in the RATINGS and got picked up???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thought Moonlight was doing bad.......does this make sense to anybody, anybody at all???????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, The Big Bang Theory did worse in the RATINGS and got picked up???</p>
<p>Thought Moonlight was doing bad&#8230;&#8230;.does this make sense to anybody, anybody at all???????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

