<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Look Back At The Top TV Shows of 1967</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-259121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-259121</guid>
		<description>Liberal Superhero,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the Gormans left Ireland, we came here in force. We are everywhere. :) And William has been no less popular than the #20 name for males in the last 100 years. My guess is that the William Gorman&#039;s of America could fill Yankee Stadium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doug beat me to the post. We have complete show data for the last couple years only, prior to that we have just the top 20, which is what I use to generate these &quot;We Look Back&quot; lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal Superhero,</p>
<p>When the Gormans left Ireland, we came here in force. We are everywhere. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And William has been no less popular than the #20 name for males in the last 100 years. My guess is that the William Gorman&#39;s of America could fill Yankee Stadium.</p>
<p>Doug beat me to the post. We have complete show data for the last couple years only, prior to that we have just the top 20, which is what I use to generate these &#8220;We Look Back&#8221; lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-259122</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-259122</guid>
		<description>The Hollywood Reporter usually comes out with a full list at the end of each season. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ABCmedianet.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ABCmedianet.com&lt;/a&gt; also has season-to-date ratings released every Tuesday, but that list includes quite literally everything that aired (even once) during the television season. So it&#039;s about 300 items long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hollywood Reporter usually comes out with a full list at the end of each season. <a href="http://ABCmedianet.com" rel="nofollow">ABCmedianet.com</a> also has season-to-date ratings released every Tuesday, but that list includes quite literally everything that aired (even once) during the television season. So it&#39;s about 300 items long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starr Manning&#39;s Lesbian Lover</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-259123</link>
		<dc:creator>Starr Manning&#39;s Lesbian Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-259123</guid>
		<description>Bill, two things...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One, you have the same name as the longtime Mayor of my hometown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two, do you know of any source with Nielsen&#039;s full list of shows for the year. Meaning complete ratings from the number one show to the lowest rated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, two things&#8230;</p>
<p>One, you have the same name as the longtime Mayor of my hometown.</p>
<p>Two, do you know of any source with Nielsen&#39;s full list of shows for the year. Meaning complete ratings from the number one show to the lowest rated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-14484</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-14484</guid>
		<description>Liberal Superhero,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the Gormans left Ireland, we came here in force. We are everywhere. :) And William has been no less popular than the #20 name for males in the last 100 years. My guess is that the William Gorman&#039;s of America could fill Yankee Stadium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doug beat me to the post. We have complete show data for the last couple years only, prior to that we have just the top 20, which is what I use to generate these &quot;We Look Back&quot; lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal Superhero,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the Gormans left Ireland, we came here in force. We are everywhere. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And William has been no less popular than the #20 name for males in the last 100 years. My guess is that the William Gorman&#39;s of America could fill Yankee Stadium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doug beat me to the post. We have complete show data for the last couple years only, prior to that we have just the top 20, which is what I use to generate these &quot;We Look Back&quot; lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>The Hollywood Reporter usually comes out with a full list at the end of each season. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ABCmedianet.com&quot;&gt;ABCmedianet.com&lt;/a&gt; also has season-to-date ratings released every Tuesday, but that list includes quite literally everything that aired (even once) during the television season. So it&#039;s about 300 items long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hollywood Reporter usually comes out with a full list at the end of each season. &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://ABCmedianet.com&quot;&gt;ABCmedianet.com&lt;/a&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://ABCmedianet.com&quot;&gt;ABCmedianet.com&lt;/a&#038;gt</a>; also has season-to-date ratings released every Tuesday, but that list includes quite literally everything that aired (even once) during the television season. So it&#39;s about 300 items long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starr Manning&#39;s Lesbian Lover</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-14482</link>
		<dc:creator>Starr Manning&#39;s Lesbian Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-14482</guid>
		<description>Bill, two things...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One, you have the same name as the longtime Mayor of my hometown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two, do you know of any source with Nielsen&#039;s full list of shows for the year. Meaning complete ratings from the number one show to the lowest rated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, two things&#8230;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One, you have the same name as the longtime Mayor of my hometown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two, do you know of any source with Nielsen&#39;s full list of shows for the year. Meaning complete ratings from the number one show to the lowest rated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-13756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-13756</guid>
		<description>EJHill, Good information, I will correct, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EJHill, Good information, I will correct, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJHill</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-2/#comment-13755</link>
		<dc:creator>EJHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-13755</guid>
		<description>Super Bowl I was NOT simulcast. Both CBS and NBC did their own separate telecasts. This was done because NBC had the old AFL and CBS broadcast the NFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Bowl I was NOT simulcast. Both CBS and NBC did their own separate telecasts. This was done because NBC had the old AFL and CBS broadcast the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302392</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302392</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302390</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302390</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302391</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302391</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302387</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302387</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302388</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302388</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302389</link>
		<dc:creator>RR Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302389</guid>
		<description>The series&#039; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#039;s, when it wasn&#039;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series&#8217; also filmed a lot more episodes.  With the exception of Lucy, the sitcoms shot 29 to 32 shows  And keep in mind that this was down from the 50&#8242;s, when it wasn&#8217;t unusual to do 40 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302327</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302327</guid>
		<description>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &quot;mid season replacements.&quot; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#039;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &#8220;mid season replacements.&#8221; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#8217;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302326</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302326</guid>
		<description>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &quot;mid season replacements.&quot; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#039;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &#8220;mid season replacements.&#8221; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#8217;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302325</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302325</guid>
		<description>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &quot;mid season replacements.&quot; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#039;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &#8220;mid season replacements.&#8221; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#8217;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302323</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302323</guid>
		<description>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &quot;mid season replacements.&quot; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#039;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &#8220;mid season replacements.&#8221; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#8217;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302324</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302324</guid>
		<description>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &quot;mid season replacements.&quot; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#039;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the way it worked then because rarely did networks think of &#8220;mid season replacements.&#8221; Because network viewership was so high, the nets weren&#8217;t concerned with getting repeats off the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302216</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302216</guid>
		<description>No, Gilligan&#039;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#039;s return was couched in terms of &quot;OK, we&#039;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&quot;.

Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gilligan&#8217;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#8217;s return was couched in terms of &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302214</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302214</guid>
		<description>No, Gilligan&#039;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#039;s return was couched in terms of &quot;OK, we&#039;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&quot;.

Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gilligan&#8217;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#8217;s return was couched in terms of &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302215</guid>
		<description>No, Gilligan&#039;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#039;s return was couched in terms of &quot;OK, we&#039;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&quot;.

Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gilligan&#8217;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#8217;s return was couched in terms of &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302212</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302212</guid>
		<description>No, Gilligan&#039;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#039;s return was couched in terms of &quot;OK, we&#039;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&quot;.

Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gilligan&#8217;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#8217;s return was couched in terms of &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302213</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302213</guid>
		<description>No, Gilligan&#039;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#039;s return was couched in terms of &quot;OK, we&#039;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&quot;.

Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gilligan&#8217;s Island was on for three years, but its run was ended by the return of Gunsmoke. I wonder what would have happened if Jericho&#8217;s return was couched in terms of &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re killing XXX show to bring back Jericho&#8221;.</p>
<p>Chris, indeed, my typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302206</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302206</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302204</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302204</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302205</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302205</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302202</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302202</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302203</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302201</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302201</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Rolling StoneS not the Rolling Stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302189</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that Gilligan&#039;s Island only lasted one season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that Gilligan&#8217;s Island only lasted one season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302190</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302190</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that Gilligan&#039;s Island only lasted one season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that Gilligan&#8217;s Island only lasted one season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302187</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302187</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that Gilligan&#039;s Island only lasted one season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that Gilligan&#8217;s Island only lasted one season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/05/24/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1967/3891/comment-page-1/#comment-302188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3891#comment-302188</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that Gilligan&#039;s Island only lasted one season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that Gilligan&#8217;s Island only lasted one season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

