Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Weekly Top 20: LOST Leads Weak Field http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:46:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-258109 Robert Seidman Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:48:07 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-258109 Nick, <br><br>yep, true, but they were on the same network as LOST and they weren't ever power shows that LOST normally "competes" with like Idol, House, CSI, ABC's own Grey's, Desperate Housewives, DWTS, etc. Nick,

yep, true, but they were on the same network as LOST and they weren't ever power shows that LOST normally “competes” with like Idol, House, CSI, ABC's own Grey's, Desperate Housewives, DWTS, etc.

]]> By: Bill Gorman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-258110 Bill Gorman Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:47:57 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-258110 nick is correct, Jim and Trees were both new episodes, but they are not dramas.<br><br>Perhaps they are also not to be considered "competition" ;)<br><br><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-primetime-shows-may-26-june-1/4014" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-pr...</a> nick is correct, Jim and Trees were both new episodes, but they are not dramas.

Perhaps they are also not to be considered “competition” ;)

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-pr…

]]> By: nick http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-258111 nick Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:43:55 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-258111 Robert<br><br>didn't according to jim and men in trees have new episodes that week too, yes they are still on :( Robert

didn't according to jim and men in trees have new episodes that week too, yes they are still on :(

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-258112 Robert Seidman Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:28:03 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-258112 Interesting factoid indeed. It may have also been the first time that it aired in a week with zero new scripted drama competition for the entire week from any other network. Interesting factoid indeed. It may have also been the first time that it aired in a week with zero new scripted drama competition for the entire week from any other network.

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-14684 Robert Seidman Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:48:07 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-14684 Nick, <br><br>yep, true, but they were on the same network as LOST and they weren't ever power shows that LOST normally "competes" with like Idol, House, CSI, ABC's own Grey's, Desperate Housewives, DWTS, etc. Nick,

yep, true, but they were on the same network as LOST and they weren't ever power shows that LOST normally “competes” with like Idol, House, CSI, ABC's own Grey's, Desperate Housewives, DWTS, etc.

]]> By: Bill Gorman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-13625 Bill Gorman Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:47:57 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-13625 nick is correct, Jim and Trees were both new episodes, but they are not dramas.<br><br>Perhaps they are also not to be considered "competition" ;)<br><br><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-primetime-shows-may-26-june-1/4014">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-pr...</a> nick is correct, Jim and Trees were both new episodes, but they are not dramas.

Perhaps they are also not to be considered “competition” ;)

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/04/top-abc-pr…

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-13624 Robert Seidman Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:28:03 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-13624 Interesting factoid indeed. It may have also been the first time that it aired in a week with zero new scripted drama competition for the entire week from any other network. Interesting factoid indeed. It may have also been the first time that it aired in a week with zero new scripted drama competition for the entire week from any other network.

]]> By: Doug http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-302913 Doug Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:38:00 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-302913 Interesting factoid - this was Lost's first time ever in TV's top spot. Guess there's a silver lining in there somewhere. Interesting factoid – this was Lost’s first time ever in TV’s top spot. Guess there’s a silver lining in there somewhere.

]]> By: Doug http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/04/nielsen-ratings-weekly-top-20-lost-leads-weak-field/4018/comment-page-1/#comment-302914 Doug Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:38:00 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4018#comment-302914 Interesting factoid - this was Lost's first time ever in TV's top spot. Guess there's a silver lining in there somewhere. Interesting factoid – this was Lost’s first time ever in TV’s top spot. Guess there’s a silver lining in there somewhere.

]]>