<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Wednesday June 18: Reality Over Reruns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-232781</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-232781</guid>
		<description>Granted, part of that was apparently because they only wanted SAG actors, but it&#039;s still funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, part of that was apparently because they only wanted SAG actors, but it&#39;s still funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-232782</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-232782</guid>
		<description>Gladly!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_turns_up_to_the_gossip.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_tur...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gladly!  <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_turns_up_to_the_gossip.html" rel="nofollow">http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_tur&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-14913</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-14913</guid>
		<description>Granted, part of that was apparently because they only wanted SAG actors, but it&#039;s still funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, part of that was apparently because they only wanted SAG actors, but it&#39;s still funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-14257</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-14257</guid>
		<description>Gladly!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_turns_up_to_the_gossip.html&quot;&gt;http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_tur...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gladly!  <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_turns_up_to_the_gossip.html">http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/06/no_one_tur&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-14256</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-14256</guid>
		<description>@Angie: Where? Got a link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Angie: Where? Got a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-14255</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-14255</guid>
		<description>Did you guys read about how the CW held a casting call for their &quot;hit&quot; Gossip Girl . . . and only four people showed up?  Funniest story ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys read about how the CW held a casting call for their &#8220;hit&#8221; Gossip Girl . . . and only four people showed up?  Funniest story ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-14254</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-14254</guid>
		<description>You sir are correct! My lens for looking at CW results had become obscured from disuse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, a 0.9 in the 18-49 demo for FWAW, does make it a bona fide summer hit for the likes of the CW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you point out the far more expensive, and loved, Gossip Girl averaged only a 1.0 18-49 rating during the regular season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sir are correct! My lens for looking at CW results had become obscured from disuse.</p>
<p>Indeed, a 0.9 in the 18-49 demo for FWAW, does make it a bona fide summer hit for the likes of the CW.</p>
<p>As you point out the far more expensive, and loved, Gossip Girl averaged only a 1.0 18-49 rating during the regular season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-303451</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-303451</guid>
		<description>not to go all contrary on you (shocking, I know) but at 2.31mm and a .9 in the demo on a $ earned vs. $ spent basis, Farmer Wants a Wife is a a CASH COW compared to Gossip Girl.  And though Gossip Girl is quite fair and lovely, from a margin perspective it&#039;s inconceivable that enough lipstick can be applied to the pig to pretty it up enough to stand in the company of Farmer Wants a Wife!

Is it scary?  Yes! But don&#039;t worry, CW has paid its phone bill and is buying PLENTY OF LIPSTICK for the upcoming season anyway, but if they can&#039;t get up to 4 million viewers with a new shade of pink for GG, Farmer Wants a Wife is the better business proposition, and at the scale of CW, you&#039;d have to declare it a summer hit! (seriously).  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to go all contrary on you (shocking, I know) but at 2.31mm and a .9 in the demo on a $ earned vs. $ spent basis, Farmer Wants a Wife is a a CASH COW compared to Gossip Girl.  And though Gossip Girl is quite fair and lovely, from a margin perspective it&#8217;s inconceivable that enough lipstick can be applied to the pig to pretty it up enough to stand in the company of Farmer Wants a Wife!</p>
<p>Is it scary?  Yes! But don&#8217;t worry, CW has paid its phone bill and is buying PLENTY OF LIPSTICK for the upcoming season anyway, but if they can&#8217;t get up to 4 million viewers with a new shade of pink for GG, Farmer Wants a Wife is the better business proposition, and at the scale of CW, you&#8217;d have to declare it a summer hit! (seriously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/06/19/nielsen-ratings-wednesday-june-18-reality-over-reruns/4178/comment-page-1/#comment-303452</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4178#comment-303452</guid>
		<description>not to go all contrary on you (shocking, I know) but at 2.31mm and a .9 in the demo on a $ earned vs. $ spent basis, Farmer Wants a Wife is a a CASH COW compared to Gossip Girl.  And though Gossip Girl is quite fair and lovely, from a margin perspective it&#039;s inconceivable that enough lipstick can be applied to the pig to pretty it up enough to stand in the company of Farmer Wants a Wife!

Is it scary?  Yes! But don&#039;t worry, CW has paid its phone bill and is buying PLENTY OF LIPSTICK for the upcoming season anyway, but if they can&#039;t get up to 4 million viewers with a new shade of pink for GG, Farmer Wants a Wife is the better business proposition, and at the scale of CW, you&#039;d have to declare it a summer hit! (seriously).  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to go all contrary on you (shocking, I know) but at 2.31mm and a .9 in the demo on a $ earned vs. $ spent basis, Farmer Wants a Wife is a a CASH COW compared to Gossip Girl.  And though Gossip Girl is quite fair and lovely, from a margin perspective it&#8217;s inconceivable that enough lipstick can be applied to the pig to pretty it up enough to stand in the company of Farmer Wants a Wife!</p>
<p>Is it scary?  Yes! But don&#8217;t worry, CW has paid its phone bill and is buying PLENTY OF LIPSTICK for the upcoming season anyway, but if they can&#8217;t get up to 4 million viewers with a new shade of pink for GG, Farmer Wants a Wife is the better business proposition, and at the scale of CW, you&#8217;d have to declare it a summer hit! (seriously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

