Site Logo

'

Kvetching About TV Show Distribution Online

Categories: '

Written By

August 1st, 2008

For the Yiddish challenged, to kvetch basically means to complain or whine about something.  Loosely translated, "kvetch, kvetch, kvetch" is the same as "bitch, bitch, bitch".

Let me disclaim right up front that things are getting better all the time, are way better than they were ten years ago, five years ago or even a year ago.  Things take time, but I'm complaining anyway.  I feel entitled to my lack of patience. It's not like I'm going to live forever so sometimes I feel like I need results right now!

I saw that a new season of Eureka was premiering on SciFi and I've never watched the show.  I wanted to take a look at it and since it runs on SciFi I figured the content might be on Hulu.   I was right and wrong.  I think the last five episodes of season two were on Hulu.  But that's not what I wanted.  I like to watch shows from the beginning if I can.

Here's my advice to the distributors of television show content.  If you're going to make any of your content available for free via the Internet, always, always, always include the very first couple of episodes of a show.  I'm not alone in my desire to watch things from the beginning, especially if the shows are serial in nature (like BattleStar Galactica and you guessed it, BSG does not have its initial episodes up on the Internet via Hulu either).

Worse in this particular case for me is that because it's on SciFi, and NBCU property, it's not on iTunes.  Sure I can buy it off of Amazon.com, but then it becomes a pain in the butt to do anything with it, like put it on my iPhone.  And sure, some of you think I'm nuts for wanting to view shows on a 3.5" screen, but I really enjoy it.   The technology is all about giving people choice and control of their media experiences and this isn't working particularly great yet.

It winds up tantamount to SciFi/NBCU encouraging me to download the torrent.  For the record, I'm all for paying for content. I have lots of DVDs, have bought lots of stuff via iTunes and spend $100+/month on the TV portion of my cable bill.  I am against paying for content more than once though (the studios *love* making you do this, and that revenue is all going away...some day).

I'm also against paying for content I'm not sure I'll like.  I believe in at least a little bit of "try before you buy."  I feel like since I support SciFi via my cable bill, I already paid for the Eureka content. I just didn't happen to watch it or DVR it.  Some of that's on me, so I'm not completely against the notion for paying twice if I like it.  But I'm kind of against the notion of paying even $1.99 to find out whether I'll like it.  I don't think I'm  asking for much here really.  Just put the frakkin' pilot of Eureka up on Hulu.  And then kiss and make up with Apple, so I can actually buy the seasons of it on iTunes if I like it.

Is that so much to ask? ;)

(10) Comments - Add Yours!

If you'd like to personalize your comments left on TVbytheNumbers with your picture or other avatar, please visit www.gravatar.com. Just use the same e-mail address here that you used when registering your gravatar.com account and the picture you selected will show up next to your comments.
  1. Gusar

    You’ve pretty much hit the nail on the head here. I can’t help but wonder… are studio execs really, really dumb or do they want to drive people to torrents? I really can’t see any other explanations for some of the stuff they do.

  2. Gusar

    You’ve pretty much hit the nail on the head here. I can’t help but wonder… are studio execs really, really dumb or do they want to drive people to torrents? I really can’t see any other explanations for some of the stuff they do.

  3. Anonymous

    The vast majority of my TV viewing is done online, so I know where you are coming from. I’m ecstatic that there are so many more shows available online now and that the video players have improved immensely. I can understand why companies don’t want to have the entire series online or even the whole previous season once it’s available on DVD. On the other hand, I wish more would have all of the current season available instead of just the last 4-5 episodes. I also wish that FOX wouldn’t wait 2-3 weeks to put episodes online (they did this with House and Bones last year). I agree that having the premiere, the last finale, and perhaps one or two other episodes available online could help bring in new viewers who missed the first season. Even doing the 2-minute recaps like USA did last summer with Monk and Psych would be better than nothing (though, those would be more important for serialized shows).

  4. Anonymous

    The vast majority of my TV viewing is done online, so I know where you are coming from. I’m ecstatic that there are so many more shows available online now and that the video players have improved immensely. I can understand why companies don’t want to have the entire series online or even the whole previous season once it’s available on DVD. On the other hand, I wish more would have all of the current season available instead of just the last 4-5 episodes. I also wish that FOX wouldn’t wait 2-3 weeks to put episodes online (they did this with House and Bones last year). I agree that having the premiere, the last finale, and perhaps one or two other episodes available online could help bring in new viewers who missed the first season. Even doing the 2-minute recaps like USA did last summer with Monk and Psych would be better than nothing (though, those would be more important for serialized shows).

  5. There are several shows that hold back their content 8 days. Along with House and Bones, I know BSG does the same thing. Other shows are up immediately the next day. I’m not sure of logic behind it. For House and Bones I suppose you could argue they’re looking to maximize paid downloads via iTunes.

  6. There are several shows that hold back their content 8 days. Along with House and Bones, I know BSG does the same thing. Other shows are up immediately the next day. I’m not sure of logic behind it. For House and Bones I suppose you could argue they’re looking to maximize paid downloads via iTunes.

  7. Outlander

    So what did you think of Eureka? I like it – it seems quirky and fun, and the characters are pretty well developed. I understand its ratings were fairly strong (2.14 HH) too, which is pretty good considering that NBC does not cross-promote Scifi shows on any other networks.

  8. I didn't start watching it yet because…I couldn't find the pilot, or buy it on iTunes!

  9. Outlander

    So what did you think of Eureka? I like it – it seems quirky and fun, and the characters are pretty well developed. I understand its ratings were fairly strong (2.14 HH) too, which is pretty good considering that NBC does not cross-promote Scifi shows on any other networks.

  10. I didn't start watching it yet because…I couldn't find the pilot, or buy it on iTunes!

© 2008 TVbytheNumbers, all rights reserved. Zap2it Partner