<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review (kinda): Stargate Continuum DVD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/comment-page-1/#comment-265876</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4631#comment-265876</guid>
		<description>Though Continuum was a definite improvement over Ark, there still wasn&#039;t enough O&#039;Neill for my tastes.  Rumor is that a third movie will be Jack-centric, which is fine by me.  RDA is getting back into shape after multiple surgeries and to this day, nothing beats the chemistry of the original SG-1 team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Continuum was a definite improvement over Ark, there still wasn&#39;t enough O&#39;Neill for my tastes.  Rumor is that a third movie will be Jack-centric, which is fine by me.  RDA is getting back into shape after multiple surgeries and to this day, nothing beats the chemistry of the original SG-1 team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/comment-page-1/#comment-14538</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4631#comment-14538</guid>
		<description>Though Continuum was a definite improvement over Ark, there still wasn&#039;t enough O&#039;Neill for my tastes.  Rumor is that a third movie will be Jack-centric, which is fine by me.  RDA is getting back into shape after multiple surgeries and to this day, nothing beats the chemistry of the original SG-1 team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Continuum was a definite improvement over Ark, there still wasn&#39;t enough O&#39;Neill for my tastes.  Rumor is that a third movie will be Jack-centric, which is fine by me.  RDA is getting back into shape after multiple surgeries and to this day, nothing beats the chemistry of the original SG-1 team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/comment-page-1/#comment-14537</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4631#comment-14537</guid>
		<description>Outlander, no idea really.  DVD sales revenue doesn&#039;t = pure profits (Best Buy and Walmart take their cut).  But the US isn&#039;t the only market, and they will of course air the thing on television eventually and generate revenue that way as well.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ark is a haze to me at this point, but as I remember it had much more in the way of special effects than Continuum, but still I&#039;m surprised to hear production costs were $7mm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander, no idea really.  DVD sales revenue doesn&#39;t = pure profits (Best Buy and Walmart take their cut).  But the US isn&#39;t the only market, and they will of course air the thing on television eventually and generate revenue that way as well.  </p>
<p>Ark is a haze to me at this point, but as I remember it had much more in the way of special effects than Continuum, but still I&#39;m surprised to hear production costs were $7mm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/08/08/review-kinda-stargate-continuum-dvd/4631/comment-page-1/#comment-14536</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4631#comment-14536</guid>
		<description>The budget for Ark of Truth was $7m and as of this week, it brought in $8.5 million in DVD sales.  I know you&#039;re mainly a TV guy, but is that actually a decent profit?  It makes me wonder how Continuum is going to do and if they&#039;ll produce a third Stargate themed movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget for Ark of Truth was $7m and as of this week, it brought in $8.5 million in DVD sales.  I know you&#39;re mainly a TV guy, but is that actually a decent profit?  It makes me wonder how Continuum is going to do and if they&#39;ll produce a third Stargate themed movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

