<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 90210 Nielsen Ratings: Oh.My.Gawd!, Says the CW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21575</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21575</guid>
		<description>SG GG fan, it&#039;s reasonable to speculate that the ratings can only likely go down regardless (pretty much true for most shows after the premiere).  The teens won&#039;t likely matter (at least from a CW spin point of view) so long as the #s with the 18-34 females perform well relative to the competition.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right that there were an awful lot of people who remember the original and checked it out.  I&#039;m guessing more of those people were 35-49 than 18-34, though that is just a guess. On the positive side, very much unlike Bionic Woman, now that the critics have finally seen the show, they were mostly positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SG GG fan, it&#8217;s reasonable to speculate that the ratings can only likely go down regardless (pretty much true for most shows after the premiere).  The teens won&#8217;t likely matter (at least from a CW spin point of view) so long as the #s with the 18-34 females perform well relative to the competition.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right that there were an awful lot of people who remember the original and checked it out.  I&#8217;m guessing more of those people were 35-49 than 18-34, though that is just a guess. On the positive side, very much unlike Bionic Woman, now that the critics have finally seen the show, they were mostly positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SG GG fan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21574</link>
		<dc:creator>SG GG fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21574</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I can&#039;t help but to wonder whether GG scoring better than 90210 in the teen &amp; female teen demo might be a foreshadow to the latter being the Bionic Woman of the 2008/09 season. 

Clearly the ones watching 90210 are fans from the original because the teen demo were too young back then to watch it. I see this as 90210 being rather unsuccessful in attracting those who didn&#039;t watch the original, which kinda sucks because they seem to be the show&#039;s primary target audience.  Once fans from the original go, that&#039;s it for 90210. Some allusions to Bionic Woman IMO. When fans of the original BW left the remake because it sucked compared to the original, the new fans weren&#039;t strong enough to save it. If I were The CW, I&#039;d be ringing up every single soul who acted in the original by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I can&#8217;t help but to wonder whether GG scoring better than 90210 in the teen &amp; female teen demo might be a foreshadow to the latter being the Bionic Woman of the 2008/09 season. </p>
<p>Clearly the ones watching 90210 are fans from the original because the teen demo were too young back then to watch it. I see this as 90210 being rather unsuccessful in attracting those who didn&#8217;t watch the original, which kinda sucks because they seem to be the show&#8217;s primary target audience.  Once fans from the original go, that&#8217;s it for 90210. Some allusions to Bionic Woman IMO. When fans of the original BW left the remake because it sucked compared to the original, the new fans weren&#8217;t strong enough to save it. If I were The CW, I&#8217;d be ringing up every single soul who acted in the original by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SG GG fan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21573</link>
		<dc:creator>SG GG fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21573</guid>
		<description>troy&#039;s right. read it properly, bart.
4.3 is for women 18-34. it only got 2.1 with female teens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>troy&#8217;s right. read it properly, bart.<br />
4.3 is for women 18-34. it only got 2.1 with female teens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21572</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21572</guid>
		<description>Bart:

&lt;i&gt;On the strength of the two-hour 90210, The CW was the #1 network on Tuesday night in all key demographics, including adults 18-34 (3.0/9), women 18-34 (4.3/12), men 18-34 (1.8/6), adults 18-49 (2.6/7), women 18-49 (3.6/9), persons 12-34 (2.7/8), females 12-34 (3.7/11), teens (1.7/6), &lt;b&gt;female teens (2.1/7).&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/i&gt;

18-34 year olds are not teens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart:</p>
<p><i>On the strength of the two-hour 90210, The CW was the #1 network on Tuesday night in all key demographics, including adults 18-34 (3.0/9), women 18-34 (4.3/12), men 18-34 (1.8/6), adults 18-49 (2.6/7), women 18-49 (3.6/9), persons 12-34 (2.7/8), females 12-34 (3.7/11), teens (1.7/6), <b>female teens (2.1/7).</b> </i></p>
<p>18-34 year olds are not teens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21571</guid>
		<description>90210 had a 4.3 with female teens!   How is 4.1 twice as much as 4.3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90210 had a 4.3 with female teens!   How is 4.1 twice as much as 4.3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/03/90210-nielsen-ratings-ohmygawd-says-the-cw/4899/comment-page-1/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4899#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>For a show with so many teens, the show did horribly among teenagers. Just a day ago, the CW was boasting that Gossip Girl had a 4.1 in female teens while One Tree Hill had a 3.0. So GG basically had twice as many teenagers watching it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a show with so many teens, the show did horribly among teenagers. Just a day ago, the CW was boasting that Gossip Girl had a 4.1 in female teens while One Tree Hill had a 3.0. So GG basically had twice as many teenagers watching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

