<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emmy Awards Ratings &amp; Ad Cost 1986-2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/23/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/298/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/23/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/298/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/23/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/298/comment-page-1/#comment-23567</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/09/18/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/#comment-23567</guid>
		<description>Matt, I looked at the spreadsheet data for the Emmys. I believe there were a couple of factors at play. One 1986 was actually a big UP year.  In 1986, it ran on NBC, and had a household rating/share of 23.1/36 - the year before on ABC, it had an 18.6/29 and the year before that on CBS it had a 17.1/33 (and viewers of 20.2 million).  

in 1987 -- for the first time -- and then for six straight years, the awards moved to Fox.  not as many people watched Fox back then -- that predates NFL and even The Simpsons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I looked at the spreadsheet data for the Emmys. I believe there were a couple of factors at play. One 1986 was actually a big UP year.  In 1986, it ran on NBC, and had a household rating/share of 23.1/36 &#8211; the year before on ABC, it had an 18.6/29 and the year before that on CBS it had a 17.1/33 (and viewers of 20.2 million).  </p>
<p>in 1987 &#8212; for the first time &#8212; and then for six straight years, the awards moved to Fox.  not as many people watched Fox back then &#8212; that predates NFL and even The Simpsons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/09/23/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/298/comment-page-1/#comment-23564</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/09/18/emmy-awards-viewers-vs-ad-cost-1986-2006/#comment-23564</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know why the ratings dropped so much in 1987? The strike wasn&#039;t until 1988. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why the ratings dropped so much in 1987? The strike wasn&#8217;t until 1988. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

