<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, November 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-2/#comment-36849</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-36849</guid>
		<description>Ah, I thought November 6th was after when you closed them. I forgot November is already almost over. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I thought November 6th was after when you closed them. I forgot November is already almost over. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-36848</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-36848</guid>
		<description>Julia, old posts will continue to have comments open. It&#039;s a manual post by post process to lock them and not worth the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, old posts will continue to have comments open. It&#8217;s a manual post by post process to lock them and not worth the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-36846</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-36846</guid>
		<description>You opened up the comments again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You opened up the comments again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wooller</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-36843</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wooller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-36843</guid>
		<description>I hope CNN takes back number 1 spot and crushes the False Noise Channel!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope CNN takes back number 1 spot and crushes the False Noise Channel!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PapaBeargotPunked</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32838</link>
		<dc:creator>PapaBeargotPunked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32838</guid>
		<description>astonished .... guess the Rethugs turned in on Thursday for the last time and watched the Billo the Clown just to make sure Obama really won! Its downhill for the Rethugs now.

I watched Billo the Clown and Hannity myself yesterday ... loved seeing their squirm ... specially Hannity looks like Chris Wallace hurt the girly man in him! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>astonished &#8230;. guess the Rethugs turned in on Thursday for the last time and watched the Billo the Clown just to make sure Obama really won! Its downhill for the Rethugs now.</p>
<p>I watched Billo the Clown and Hannity myself yesterday &#8230; loved seeing their squirm &#8230; specially Hannity looks like Chris Wallace hurt the girly man in him! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astonished</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32785</link>
		<dc:creator>astonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32785</guid>
		<description>Where is everyone telling us how MSNBC is going to keep winning the key demo? 

Olberman won four or five days in the weeks prior to the election and now as predicted, his numbers are slipping!

No comments from Fab or Pink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is everyone telling us how MSNBC is going to keep winning the key demo? </p>
<p>Olberman won four or five days in the weeks prior to the election and now as predicted, his numbers are slipping!</p>
<p>No comments from Fab or Pink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pri</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32744</link>
		<dc:creator>pri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32744</guid>
		<description>sorry for the very sloppy spellings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the very sloppy spellings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pri</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32743</link>
		<dc:creator>pri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32743</guid>
		<description>To me it only appears that Palin energiezed the conservative base.  Nothing more.  That&#039;s not gonna will general elections...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it only appears that Palin energiezed the conservative base.  Nothing more.  That&#8217;s not gonna will general elections&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32731</guid>
		<description>its so funny how people try and rag on fox for being unfair or in the tank for gop.ummm...are u really that stupid so ur telling me that olbermann and msnbc is fair and always shows both sides of rhe story?????come on fox is bar far the fairest the liberals dont like it cuz its the only big media organization that is....typical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its so funny how people try and rag on fox for being unfair or in the tank for gop.ummm&#8230;are u really that stupid so ur telling me that olbermann and msnbc is fair and always shows both sides of rhe story?????come on fox is bar far the fairest the liberals dont like it cuz its the only big media organization that is&#8230;.typical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XSPIN</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32709</link>
		<dc:creator>XSPIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32709</guid>
		<description>Fox news &quot;fair and balance&quot;lol...I&#039;m really trying to stop laughing,but I can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox news &#8220;fair and balance&#8221;lol&#8230;I&#8217;m really trying to stop laughing,but I can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 123</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32678</link>
		<dc:creator>123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32678</guid>
		<description>Faux News is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faux News is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shobo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32633</link>
		<dc:creator>shobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32633</guid>
		<description>America47000

Yes the libs that watch MSNBC are very blind.  It befuddles me that they would even try to argue their positions on these boards.  They only look foolish, but are welcome to try.  Yes Rasmussen was on the Fox news channels, and his polls were proven to be the most accurate.  They were spot on in predicting the Obama win and margin of vistory.  
The MSNBC nuts always have the most liberal from newsweek on their channel, seems like every day. They cowtow, nod, agree, and laugh it up with KO and Rachel.  It appears they are having such a good time bashing the right in this country. Turns out the Newsweek poll, the most liberal weekly rag out there, proved their bias when their poll was identified as the worst in predicting the races margin of victory.  No surpise there.  I think Times was second worst, another frequent visitor to the KO and rachel three ring circus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America47000</p>
<p>Yes the libs that watch MSNBC are very blind.  It befuddles me that they would even try to argue their positions on these boards.  They only look foolish, but are welcome to try.  Yes Rasmussen was on the Fox news channels, and his polls were proven to be the most accurate.  They were spot on in predicting the Obama win and margin of vistory.<br />
The MSNBC nuts always have the most liberal from newsweek on their channel, seems like every day. They cowtow, nod, agree, and laugh it up with KO and Rachel.  It appears they are having such a good time bashing the right in this country. Turns out the Newsweek poll, the most liberal weekly rag out there, proved their bias when their poll was identified as the worst in predicting the races margin of victory.  No surpise there.  I think Times was second worst, another frequent visitor to the KO and rachel three ring circus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shobo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32611</link>
		<dc:creator>shobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32611</guid>
		<description>The biggest endorsement this political season for fox news being unbiased and fair was the Clinton campaign: 

Clinton surrogate Ed Rendell said, “FOX has done the fairest job, and remained the most objective of all the cable networks.” 

Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe repeated this claim last night saying, “Fair and balanced Fox. You beat them all.”

And she thought they were part of the vast right wing conspiracy.  She now knows how visceral the press/cable news can be (with the accepttion of fox).  Of course if she had won the dem race, she would have benefited from the same.

But it was nice to hear such acclamations for FOX from the far left.  We may never see that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest endorsement this political season for fox news being unbiased and fair was the Clinton campaign: </p>
<p>Clinton surrogate Ed Rendell said, “FOX has done the fairest job, and remained the most objective of all the cable networks.” </p>
<p>Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe repeated this claim last night saying, “Fair and balanced Fox. You beat them all.”</p>
<p>And she thought they were part of the vast right wing conspiracy.  She now knows how visceral the press/cable news can be (with the accepttion of fox).  Of course if she had won the dem race, she would have benefited from the same.</p>
<p>But it was nice to hear such acclamations for FOX from the far left.  We may never see that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America47000</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32582</link>
		<dc:creator>America47000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32582</guid>
		<description>Exit polls showed that among those who said Palin was a factor in the election, McCain won. So my guess is she brought in more votes by energizing the base than she cost McCain, who really was in a no-win situation. He was too erratic and did not run a disciplined campaign, whereas Obama was organized and fully tapped in to new media such as the Internet.

They are bashing Palin now because they recognize her as one of the new faces of conservatism, and they see bashing her as saying that conservatism lost this election, when I don&#039;t think that it did. Obama won because conservatives were fed up with Bush growing the government, and they never liked McCain. It&#039;s a total passive-aggressive vote on their part, or they were simply swayed by Obama&#039;s speeches, or whatever. But 20% of conservatives voted for Obama, as opposed to something like 8% of liberals voting for McCain. And according to exit polls, there are more conservatives than liberals.

But while Palin may have energized the base, she didn&#039;t energize it enough. Conservative turnout was again low, as it was in 2006. Voter turnout in traditionally conservative areas was low.

I think for many conservatives, the direction of the country is so far beyond the red line they would want that, in the absence of a viable candidate they can believe in, they may have just given up. Many conservatives would prefer policies that are mutually exclusive with an entitlement state, and since entitlements aren&#039;t going anywhere regardless of whose in charge, they don&#039;t think there&#039;s much of a point to who&#039;s leading the government. So in for a penny, in for a pound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exit polls showed that among those who said Palin was a factor in the election, McCain won. So my guess is she brought in more votes by energizing the base than she cost McCain, who really was in a no-win situation. He was too erratic and did not run a disciplined campaign, whereas Obama was organized and fully tapped in to new media such as the Internet.</p>
<p>They are bashing Palin now because they recognize her as one of the new faces of conservatism, and they see bashing her as saying that conservatism lost this election, when I don&#8217;t think that it did. Obama won because conservatives were fed up with Bush growing the government, and they never liked McCain. It&#8217;s a total passive-aggressive vote on their part, or they were simply swayed by Obama&#8217;s speeches, or whatever. But 20% of conservatives voted for Obama, as opposed to something like 8% of liberals voting for McCain. And according to exit polls, there are more conservatives than liberals.</p>
<p>But while Palin may have energized the base, she didn&#8217;t energize it enough. Conservative turnout was again low, as it was in 2006. Voter turnout in traditionally conservative areas was low.</p>
<p>I think for many conservatives, the direction of the country is so far beyond the red line they would want that, in the absence of a viable candidate they can believe in, they may have just given up. Many conservatives would prefer policies that are mutually exclusive with an entitlement state, and since entitlements aren&#8217;t going anywhere regardless of whose in charge, they don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much of a point to who&#8217;s leading the government. So in for a penny, in for a pound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America47000</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32576</link>
		<dc:creator>America47000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32576</guid>
		<description>Olbermann set the tone last night when he admitted he was guilty of &quot;commenting&quot; during the campaign. A joking admission, but a telling one nonetheless. Then later he dismissed Bill Kristol, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O&#039;Reilly as &quot;you don&#039;t matter anymore.&quot;

This is arrogance to the extreme. It&#039;s like they think the election of Obama vindicates their actions, and their&#039;s are the only acceptable beliefs, so now they can be open about it.

I fully expect that if Obama were to send though police to the homes of everyone who didn&#039;t vote for him, KO would sit back and declare it as justice served.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olbermann set the tone last night when he admitted he was guilty of &#8220;commenting&#8221; during the campaign. A joking admission, but a telling one nonetheless. Then later he dismissed Bill Kristol, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O&#8217;Reilly as &#8220;you don&#8217;t matter anymore.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is arrogance to the extreme. It&#8217;s like they think the election of Obama vindicates their actions, and their&#8217;s are the only acceptable beliefs, so now they can be open about it.</p>
<p>I fully expect that if Obama were to send though police to the homes of everyone who didn&#8217;t vote for him, KO would sit back and declare it as justice served.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blazermaniac</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32575</link>
		<dc:creator>Blazermaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32575</guid>
		<description>The election is OVER! If those clowns at MSNBC can&#039;t do anything but continue this boring bashing, maybe they should get off TV now. It won&#039;t be long, even for the MSNBC die-hards to leave that programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election is OVER! If those clowns at MSNBC can&#8217;t do anything but continue this boring bashing, maybe they should get off TV now. It won&#8217;t be long, even for the MSNBC die-hards to leave that programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32562</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32562</guid>
		<description>Talk about Bias, Rachel Maddow opens her show with a mention of how she is a part of the Liberal Media....if I am not mistaken, that is openly being biased against conservatives.

By the way, K.O. getting knocked out in the &quot;Key Demo&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about Bias, Rachel Maddow opens her show with a mention of how she is a part of the Liberal Media&#8230;.if I am not mistaken, that is openly being biased against conservatives.</p>
<p>By the way, K.O. getting knocked out in the &#8220;Key Demo&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shobo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32547</link>
		<dc:creator>shobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32547</guid>
		<description>OMG MSNBC is so disgusting.  Checked in like i always do, and hardball is bashing Sarah Palin still.  They know their BO has won, I can see the tinkle trail running down Chris Mathews leg.  

They must believe the only way to keep up their ratings is to continue to bash the right, mccain, sarah, and bush.  Even their lefty crowd will get tired of it and they will leave in droves.  Leaving them sucking the very bottom of the ratings once again.  Need to change their network to MSCARP.

MSNBC - always bias and cowardly.  Down we go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG MSNBC is so disgusting.  Checked in like i always do, and hardball is bashing Sarah Palin still.  They know their BO has won, I can see the tinkle trail running down Chris Mathews leg.  </p>
<p>They must believe the only way to keep up their ratings is to continue to bash the right, mccain, sarah, and bush.  Even their lefty crowd will get tired of it and they will leave in droves.  Leaving them sucking the very bottom of the ratings once again.  Need to change their network to MSCARP.</p>
<p>MSNBC &#8211; always bias and cowardly.  Down we go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America47000</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32537</link>
		<dc:creator>America47000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32537</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I mean, since CNN has more name recognition than Fox News or MSNBC among the average TV viewer.

CNN won election night and drew good numbers for the morning show, obviously because of people waking up and turning on CNN for more results ... people like you said who won&#039;t be watching cable news regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I mean, since CNN has more name recognition than Fox News or MSNBC among the average TV viewer.</p>
<p>CNN won election night and drew good numbers for the morning show, obviously because of people waking up and turning on CNN for more results &#8230; people like you said who won&#8217;t be watching cable news regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32534</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32534</guid>
		<description>America, CNN typically gets the &quot;surge&quot; viewers (who would otherwise never watch cable news) during big events, disasters, etc. They arrive quickly and leave just as quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America, CNN typically gets the &#8220;surge&#8221; viewers (who would otherwise never watch cable news) during big events, disasters, etc. They arrive quickly and leave just as quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America47000</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/06/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-november-5/7747/comment-page-1/#comment-32532</link>
		<dc:creator>America47000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7747#comment-32532</guid>
		<description>CNN must be drawing the generic non-regular viewer looking for election and post-election news. They still have the name recognition advantage.

But O&#039;Reilly takes it convincingly. Obamamann will be hard pressed to keep up, if his post-election hour of gloating and the subsequent ratings are any indication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN must be drawing the generic non-regular viewer looking for election and post-election news. They still have the name recognition advantage.</p>
<p>But O&#8217;Reilly takes it convincingly. Obamamann will be hard pressed to keep up, if his post-election hour of gloating and the subsequent ratings are any indication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

