<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top ABC Primetime Shows, November 3-9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/11/top-abc-primetime-shows-november-3-9/7944/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/11/top-abc-primetime-shows-november-3-9/7944/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Mullins</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/11/top-abc-primetime-shows-november-3-9/7944/comment-page-1/#comment-37940</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7944#comment-37940</guid>
		<description>It is so hard to believe that you are cancelling Boston Legal.  I am 64 my husband 76, and as you show said this evening, what is the problem with broadcasting for the senior citizens.  We BOTH love this show.  I can&#039;t watch Desparate Housewifes, as my husband doesn&#039;t like it, I have don&#039;t watch 24 because it is to stressful, but my husband loves it.  But you know what, we BOTH watch Boston Legal and love every second of it, do many of our senior friends.  Pay attention to you own show. Ugly Betty is not for us, si-fi stuff is difficult to understand, football is not on every night, news gets old, so what do we watch???????  Upset about loosing a wonderfully written, entertaining, and needed ABC program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so hard to believe that you are cancelling Boston Legal.  I am 64 my husband 76, and as you show said this evening, what is the problem with broadcasting for the senior citizens.  We BOTH love this show.  I can&#8217;t watch Desparate Housewifes, as my husband doesn&#8217;t like it, I have don&#8217;t watch 24 because it is to stressful, but my husband loves it.  But you know what, we BOTH watch Boston Legal and love every second of it, do many of our senior friends.  Pay attention to you own show. Ugly Betty is not for us, si-fi stuff is difficult to understand, football is not on every night, news gets old, so what do we watch???????  Upset about loosing a wonderfully written, entertaining, and needed ABC program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/11/top-abc-primetime-shows-november-3-9/7944/comment-page-1/#comment-34295</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7944#comment-34295</guid>
		<description>yes, without the election coverage, it would have been 8th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, without the election coverage, it would have been 8th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maahem</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2008/11/11/top-abc-primetime-shows-november-3-9/7944/comment-page-1/#comment-33594</link>
		<dc:creator>maahem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7944#comment-33594</guid>
		<description>I have a question - would Ugly Betty really be at #8 since there are 3 specials infront of it that only aired that week? Had those specials not aired, it would be at #8 right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question &#8211; would Ugly Betty really be at #8 since there are 3 specials infront of it that only aired that week? Had those specials not aired, it would be at #8 right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

