<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Ratings: CBS Tops Viewers, NBC&#039;s Biggest Loser Weighty in the Demos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt2</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-4/#comment-42668</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42668</guid>
		<description>JT, I agree with you that ABC is probably satisfied with the first numbers for all of its new Tuesday night lineup. A 7.8 for Homeland Security, a big improvement with Scrubs over ATJ, and the return of the popular newmag, What Would You Do, all delivered solid numbers. If they hold onto or build upon these numbers, it will put ABC in a great position going into March with the return of DWTS: The Results.

I don&#039;t know for certain but it would appear that Tuesday night is NBC&#039;s strongest night of programming now that SNF has ended. Big numbers for The Biggest Loser and L&amp;O: SVU had to put a huge grin on the faces at NBC.

At CBS they have to be chomping at the bit to see how well their big guns do against AI next week. They probably smell victory in the air. This is looking like the year that AI fades even more significantly than it did last spring and we have to note that their were some nights when AI barely scored a 21.5 rating last season. I&#039;m thinking AI will win a few of the first weeks but then drop off significantly enough to allow CBS to take over the night. Then in March AI will be squeezed even further with the return of DWTS: The Results, which demonstrated last fall that it can hold its own against The Mentalist. Clearly, we have already seen from these first few nights of the first week in January that so far every single network is connecting with their niche and this spring 2009 could bring one of the biggest ratings battles between the big four that we have seen in a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT, I agree with you that ABC is probably satisfied with the first numbers for all of its new Tuesday night lineup. A 7.8 for Homeland Security, a big improvement with Scrubs over ATJ, and the return of the popular newmag, What Would You Do, all delivered solid numbers. If they hold onto or build upon these numbers, it will put ABC in a great position going into March with the return of DWTS: The Results.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know for certain but it would appear that Tuesday night is NBC&#8217;s strongest night of programming now that SNF has ended. Big numbers for The Biggest Loser and L&amp;O: SVU had to put a huge grin on the faces at NBC.</p>
<p>At CBS they have to be chomping at the bit to see how well their big guns do against AI next week. They probably smell victory in the air. This is looking like the year that AI fades even more significantly than it did last spring and we have to note that their were some nights when AI barely scored a 21.5 rating last season. I&#8217;m thinking AI will win a few of the first weeks but then drop off significantly enough to allow CBS to take over the night. Then in March AI will be squeezed even further with the return of DWTS: The Results, which demonstrated last fall that it can hold its own against The Mentalist. Clearly, we have already seen from these first few nights of the first week in January that so far every single network is connecting with their niche and this spring 2009 could bring one of the biggest ratings battles between the big four that we have seen in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmokey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-4/#comment-42575</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42575</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the double post, but, jeez, Cuidado con el Angel had nearly as good an 18-34 demo as did the Mentalist.

CBS&#039;s numbers are fool&#039;s gold, my friends.  Impressive now, but not going to be worth it in the long haul.  Their audience just keeps getting older, while ad agencies&#039; desires just keep getting younger.  18-34 is the new 18-49 for those guys.  Pretty soon, they may be only interested in prepubescents.

To the people ad guys drool over, Thomas Jane and Jethro Bodine are just &quot;those old guys my mom and gramma drool over.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the double post, but, jeez, Cuidado con el Angel had nearly as good an 18-34 demo as did the Mentalist.</p>
<p>CBS&#8217;s numbers are fool&#8217;s gold, my friends.  Impressive now, but not going to be worth it in the long haul.  Their audience just keeps getting older, while ad agencies&#8217; desires just keep getting younger.  18-34 is the new 18-49 for those guys.  Pretty soon, they may be only interested in prepubescents.</p>
<p>To the people ad guys drool over, Thomas Jane and Jethro Bodine are just &#8220;those old guys my mom and gramma drool over.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmokey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-4/#comment-42557</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42557</guid>
		<description>So, all kudos to The Mentalist, but c&#039;mon, it&#039;s demos get hammered by Biggest Loser, and by Scrubs in the 18-34, for goshsakes.  It&#039;s a hit, but it sure ain&#039;t a big $$$$$ hit in the ad rate department. 

I mean, how much of a hit are you really when a bad flu epidemic this winter could end up wiping out 70% of your audience?

Ok, hyperbole, and I know it, but let&#039;s not go off the rails here because every blue haired lady in America gets wet panties over Simon Baker.  Ask me, I&#039;d rather have Biggest Loser than The Mentalist on my net any day of the week.

Of course, then I&#039;d never actually watch my own network, but at least I&#039;d be making boatloads of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, all kudos to The Mentalist, but c&#8217;mon, it&#8217;s demos get hammered by Biggest Loser, and by Scrubs in the 18-34, for goshsakes.  It&#8217;s a hit, but it sure ain&#8217;t a big $$$$$ hit in the ad rate department. </p>
<p>I mean, how much of a hit are you really when a bad flu epidemic this winter could end up wiping out 70% of your audience?</p>
<p>Ok, hyperbole, and I know it, but let&#8217;s not go off the rails here because every blue haired lady in America gets wet panties over Simon Baker.  Ask me, I&#8217;d rather have Biggest Loser than The Mentalist on my net any day of the week.</p>
<p>Of course, then I&#8217;d never actually watch my own network, but at least I&#8217;d be making boatloads of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-4/#comment-42542</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42542</guid>
		<description>sfdsdf, you are correct sir! I plead simple typo. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sfdsdf, you are correct sir! I plead simple typo. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfdsdf</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-4/#comment-42536</link>
		<dc:creator>sfdsdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42536</guid>
		<description>The 18-49 demo for FOX on the chart is messed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 18-49 demo for FOX on the chart is messed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSFABC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42515</link>
		<dc:creator>GSFABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42515</guid>
		<description>I just read this Text. 

http://www.scrubs-hq.com/news/archives/368

Sounds really great, but is it really? I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this Text. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.scrubs-hq.com/news/archives/368" rel="nofollow">http://www.scrubs-hq.com/news/archives/368</a></p>
<p>Sounds really great, but is it really? I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanatic2009</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42507</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanatic2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42507</guid>
		<description>Gahhhh I hate the ratings of Homeland Security USA and Scrubs.

Bring on Castle now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gahhhh I hate the ratings of Homeland Security USA and Scrubs.</p>
<p>Bring on Castle now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grady</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42498</link>
		<dc:creator>Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42498</guid>
		<description>I kind of miss the chart with lines and color... It made it easier to read, in my opinion.  A suggestion, not a complaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of miss the chart with lines and color&#8230; It made it easier to read, in my opinion.  A suggestion, not a complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaisiesDeathKnell</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42463</link>
		<dc:creator>DaisiesDeathKnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42463</guid>
		<description>Scrubs was god-awful last year......and you can&#039;t solely blame the strike for that. The two episodes I saw last night were an absolute breath of fresh air and I feel like I&#039;m watching the show again for my own enjoyment rather than to satisfy the part of me that likes to be a completest. Those numbers are certainly nice and hopefully they can help make The Goode Family into a minor hit as I&#039;m sure that show is ace since Mike Judge has the Midas touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrubs was god-awful last year&#8230;&#8230;and you can&#8217;t solely blame the strike for that. The two episodes I saw last night were an absolute breath of fresh air and I feel like I&#8217;m watching the show again for my own enjoyment rather than to satisfy the part of me that likes to be a completest. Those numbers are certainly nice and hopefully they can help make The Goode Family into a minor hit as I&#8217;m sure that show is ace since Mike Judge has the Midas touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatten</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42432</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42432</guid>
		<description>Yes, AND when Bill Lawrence told nbc that if necessary he could finish the series in a mere three episodes, they said no.  They said he could have a one hour finale and that was it.  Scrubs is a great show, and although it&#039;s ratings have waned in recent years, it has always been a good show for nbc.  They were unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, AND when Bill Lawrence told nbc that if necessary he could finish the series in a mere three episodes, they said no.  They said he could have a one hour finale and that was it.  Scrubs is a great show, and although it&#8217;s ratings have waned in recent years, it has always been a good show for nbc.  They were unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42428</link>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42428</guid>
		<description>Though I&#039;ve heard it will be sans Braff. I wonder if he&#039;ll actually go through with it this time. Weren&#039;t there rumors during seasons five and six that Braff was quitting?

Also, Shatten, you can&#039;t quite blame NBC for Scrubs&#039; seventh seasons. The strike forced the order to be shortened. Though NBC did decided to air that last episode completely out of order for no reason. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I&#8217;ve heard it will be sans Braff. I wonder if he&#8217;ll actually go through with it this time. Weren&#8217;t there rumors during seasons five and six that Braff was quitting?</p>
<p>Also, Shatten, you can&#8217;t quite blame NBC for Scrubs&#8217; seventh seasons. The strike forced the order to be shortened. Though NBC did decided to air that last episode completely out of order for no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42423</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42423</guid>
		<description>Shatten, it&#039;s *way* too early to guess at the prospects for Scrubs, but *if* it keeps a 3.0 18-49 demo rating it will very likely be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatten, it&#8217;s *way* too early to guess at the prospects for Scrubs, but *if* it keeps a 3.0 18-49 demo rating it will very likely be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatten</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42421</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42421</guid>
		<description>so guys, do you think that abc will continue scrubs with a new cast? How good would the show have to do in order for that to happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so guys, do you think that abc will continue scrubs with a new cast? How good would the show have to do in order for that to happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AprilFox</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42409</link>
		<dc:creator>AprilFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42409</guid>
		<description>In Canada they aired The Mentalist episode on Sunday night and that&#039;s when I watched it. I watched NCIS and Scrubs and both shows rocked. Not a big Mentalist fan, its alright but I prefer Eleventh Hour over it. I&#039;m looking forward to Lie To Me (kind of a Mentalist like show) with Tim Roth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Canada they aired The Mentalist episode on Sunday night and that&#8217;s when I watched it. I watched NCIS and Scrubs and both shows rocked. Not a big Mentalist fan, its alright but I prefer Eleventh Hour over it. I&#8217;m looking forward to Lie To Me (kind of a Mentalist like show) with Tim Roth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatten</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42400</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42400</guid>
		<description>Scrubs was great last night, and i hope abc leaves it to finish it&#039;s last season and doesn&#039;t treat it like nbc did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrubs was great last night, and i hope abc leaves it to finish it&#8217;s last season and doesn&#8217;t treat it like nbc did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42395</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42395</guid>
		<description>I do think Fringe will get a big boost from Idol when it starts. I&#039;m just sorry about it. Yes, playe, I&#039;ve watched 3 episodes of Fringe. Well, maybe not 3 full episodes, but I gave it 3 different tries, but I was unable to watch a full episode after the pilot episode. I was so excited about it when I saw the trailer all those months ago. What a let down. 

Everytime I watched it I found myself wishing C.G.B Spender would stroll in, lite up a Morley and send the whole show someplace past the exosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think Fringe will get a big boost from Idol when it starts. I&#8217;m just sorry about it. Yes, playe, I&#8217;ve watched 3 episodes of Fringe. Well, maybe not 3 full episodes, but I gave it 3 different tries, but I was unable to watch a full episode after the pilot episode. I was so excited about it when I saw the trailer all those months ago. What a let down. </p>
<p>Everytime I watched it I found myself wishing C.G.B Spender would stroll in, lite up a Morley and send the whole show someplace past the exosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42388</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42388</guid>
		<description>Tony, we&#039;re glad you&#039;re reading and I&#039;m generally very happy when people post links. I probably shouldn&#039;t have called you out. My apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, we&#8217;re glad you&#8217;re reading and I&#8217;m generally very happy when people post links. I probably shouldn&#8217;t have called you out. My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42387</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42387</guid>
		<description>JT, thank you for articulating my opinion better than I did myself - I am with you down the line.  Fringe *is* a genre show and I find it impossible to believe that Fox views it as anything other than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT, thank you for articulating my opinion better than I did myself &#8211; I am with you down the line.  Fringe *is* a genre show and I find it impossible to believe that Fox views it as anything other than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyS</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42386</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42386</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the problem with reading both Monday and Tuesday at the same time.

Apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem with reading both Monday and Tuesday at the same time.</p>
<p>Apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42385</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42385</guid>
		<description>To Andrea:
I&#039;m not one who puts a lot of merit behind retention, especially when the show is a huge hit like American Idol, and I don&#039;t think Fox will either.  I think that Fox will be pleased if Fringe attracts between 12 and 13 million, which would be just over 50% retention of American Idol.  Does anyone really beleive that Fringe will pull in more than 13 million when it airs after Idol?  Fox might hope they can get 15 to 18 million to watch Fringe, but they know it&#039;s not likely to happen.  

We should also remember that House premiered to a very weak 7 million viewers in the fall 2004.  It doubled it&#039;s audience when American Idol became it&#039;s lead in, and at its peak was retaining nearly 90% of the Idol audience.  While it&#039;s possible that Fringe can catch on to that extent, I consider it highly unlikely for a genre show to repeat the success of a medical drama like House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Andrea:<br />
I&#8217;m not one who puts a lot of merit behind retention, especially when the show is a huge hit like American Idol, and I don&#8217;t think Fox will either.  I think that Fox will be pleased if Fringe attracts between 12 and 13 million, which would be just over 50% retention of American Idol.  Does anyone really beleive that Fringe will pull in more than 13 million when it airs after Idol?  Fox might hope they can get 15 to 18 million to watch Fringe, but they know it&#8217;s not likely to happen.  </p>
<p>We should also remember that House premiered to a very weak 7 million viewers in the fall 2004.  It doubled it&#8217;s audience when American Idol became it&#8217;s lead in, and at its peak was retaining nearly 90% of the Idol audience.  While it&#8217;s possible that Fringe can catch on to that extent, I consider it highly unlikely for a genre show to repeat the success of a medical drama like House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: playe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42379</link>
		<dc:creator>playe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42379</guid>
		<description>There is no justice in the world. It should have been Fringe that was the hit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no justice in the world. It should have been Fringe that was the hit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42377</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42377</guid>
		<description>Tony, a.) that was info about a *Monday* show and this is the post for Tuesday! and b.) though I love the Futon Critic, we were quicker in &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/07/secret-life-handily-defeats-cws-gossip-girl/10300&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posting the Secret Life info&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, a.) that was info about a *Monday* show and this is the post for Tuesday! and b.) though I love the Futon Critic, we were quicker in <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/07/secret-life-handily-defeats-cws-gossip-girl/10300" rel="nofollow">posting the Secret Life info</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: playe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42374</link>
		<dc:creator>playe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42374</guid>
		<description>do any of you even watch fringe? Why are all of you just tearing this show apart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do any of you even watch fringe? Why are all of you just tearing this show apart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyS</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42371</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42371</guid>
		<description>Secret Life thrashes Gossip Girl with a 4.4 total viewers.

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=20090107abcfamily01</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret Life thrashes Gossip Girl with a 4.4 total viewers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=20090107abcfamily01" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=20090107abcfamily01</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-3/#comment-42368</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42368</guid>
		<description>AC, I understand your interpretation of &quot;Fringe can&#039;t exist on its own, it needs help...&quot;  As a very experimental show in its first season, I think giving it said &quot;help&quot; via a strong lead-in, is a solid programming strategy.  I&#039;m curious to see how it fares with AI lead-in.  If it bleeds AI viewers to, say, less than 30% retention, then it won&#039;t exist much longer.  If it holds 50% or more of AI viewers, then FOX may give it a chance as a tentpole show next season!

Fringe is not the type of series that can be a tentpole right out of the gate.  That doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t be, after a couple of seasons.  House did not premiere to &quot;tentpole&quot; Nielsen numbers, either :) .

As for people who just leave the TV on and don&#039;t pay attention - there&#039;s some kind of  button on the Nielsen People Meter that you are supposed to push every few minutes to prove you are watching.  If the meter is idle for more than 15 minutes, that meter may not be counted, from what I understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AC, I understand your interpretation of &#8220;Fringe can&#8217;t exist on its own, it needs help&#8230;&#8221;  As a very experimental show in its first season, I think giving it said &#8220;help&#8221; via a strong lead-in, is a solid programming strategy.  I&#8217;m curious to see how it fares with AI lead-in.  If it bleeds AI viewers to, say, less than 30% retention, then it won&#8217;t exist much longer.  If it holds 50% or more of AI viewers, then FOX may give it a chance as a tentpole show next season!</p>
<p>Fringe is not the type of series that can be a tentpole right out of the gate.  That doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t be, after a couple of seasons.  House did not premiere to &#8220;tentpole&#8221; Nielsen numbers, either <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>As for people who just leave the TV on and don&#8217;t pay attention &#8211; there&#8217;s some kind of  button on the Nielsen People Meter that you are supposed to push every few minutes to prove you are watching.  If the meter is idle for more than 15 minutes, that meter may not be counted, from what I understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42366</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42366</guid>
		<description>AC, Fringe can make FOX plenty of money by sticking it after big shows, while plenty of other shows that have been tested behind those shows have not. So, yes, that makes FOX very happy. And who cares about the fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AC, Fringe can make FOX plenty of money by sticking it after big shows, while plenty of other shows that have been tested behind those shows have not. So, yes, that makes FOX very happy. And who cares about the fans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42365</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42365</guid>
		<description>I find this &quot;lead-in&quot; talk annoying. If Fringe can&#039;t stand on it&#039;s own without a big show in front of it to rake in the viewers who will probably just leave the TV tuned to the same channel after said &quot;big show&quot; is over, thus giving Fringe higher ratings, does that really make FOX or fans happy? 

To me, personally, it just says &quot;Fringe can&#039;t exist on it&#039;s own, and needs help to exist!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this &#8220;lead-in&#8221; talk annoying. If Fringe can&#8217;t stand on it&#8217;s own without a big show in front of it to rake in the viewers who will probably just leave the TV tuned to the same channel after said &#8220;big show&#8221; is over, thus giving Fringe higher ratings, does that really make FOX or fans happy? </p>
<p>To me, personally, it just says &#8220;Fringe can&#8217;t exist on it&#8217;s own, and needs help to exist!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42363</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42363</guid>
		<description>I LOVE SIMON BAKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!I&#039;ve been in love with him since I saw his interview on the ellen degeneres show. I also love all his movies. 

Even though I don`t really like THE MENTALIST, I still watch it cause hes in it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE SIMON BAKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!I&#8217;ve been in love with him since I saw his interview on the ellen degeneres show. I also love all his movies. </p>
<p>Even though I don`t really like THE MENTALIST, I still watch it cause hes in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42362</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42362</guid>
		<description>I really liked Homeland Security USA but ABC should put this on Fridays.. Tuesdays is way too high profiled for this show. I bet ABC is making money with this, doesnt even have a host.
With Scrubs, ABC is making 1 million per episode with $indication so ratings no matter. At least is beating Kath &amp; Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked Homeland Security USA but ABC should put this on Fridays.. Tuesdays is way too high profiled for this show. I bet ABC is making money with this, doesnt even have a host.<br />
With Scrubs, ABC is making 1 million per episode with $indication so ratings no matter. At least is beating Kath &amp; Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42358</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42358</guid>
		<description>Seriously, did anyone think a show about the border patrol would be a hit? I&#039;m surprised it did as well as it did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, did anyone think a show about the border patrol would be a hit? I&#8217;m surprised it did as well as it did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42357</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42357</guid>
		<description>idizzle, if NCIS can perform like this without any promotion (I have no idea if that&#039;s true or not since I do not watch TV on TV and don&#039;t see any promos at all) why would CBS waste the money to promote it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idizzle, if NCIS can perform like this without any promotion (I have no idea if that&#8217;s true or not since I do not watch TV on TV and don&#8217;t see any promos at all) why would CBS waste the money to promote it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42356</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42356</guid>
		<description>NCIS was down a bit. Not to steal a beloved argument rom the &quot;networks don&#039;t promote my show&quot; crowd, but maybe people actually had to discover CBS was running new episodes again, seeing how the numbers kept climbing in the later half hour. Not that they missed anything, it wasn&#039;t a very good episode and the new multi episode arc starts next week anyway.

Fringe repeast are looking lousy when not behind a new House episode. No surprise there.

Say what you will about Homeland and Scrubs, they must be losing less money than Pushing Daisies did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCIS was down a bit. Not to steal a beloved argument rom the &#8220;networks don&#8217;t promote my show&#8221; crowd, but maybe people actually had to discover CBS was running new episodes again, seeing how the numbers kept climbing in the later half hour. Not that they missed anything, it wasn&#8217;t a very good episode and the new multi episode arc starts next week anyway.</p>
<p>Fringe repeast are looking lousy when not behind a new House episode. No surprise there.</p>
<p>Say what you will about Homeland and Scrubs, they must be losing less money than Pushing Daisies did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42343</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42343</guid>
		<description>Wow, Tuesdays definitely belong to CBS. All the naysayers can put down procedurals all you want, but it&#039;s a huge cash cow for CBS and clearly viewers tune in to it in droves.

Eat your heart out, Leno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Tuesdays definitely belong to CBS. All the naysayers can put down procedurals all you want, but it&#8217;s a huge cash cow for CBS and clearly viewers tune in to it in droves.</p>
<p>Eat your heart out, Leno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42338</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42338</guid>
		<description>I think 65% retention of Idol is MORE than good enough. 45% retention might be good enough!

we have all kinds of data on how Fox did each week and you can see how stuff ranked last year for Fox while AI ran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 65% retention of Idol is MORE than good enough. 45% retention might be good enough!</p>
<p>we have all kinds of data on how Fox did each week and you can see how stuff ranked last year for Fox while AI ran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42337</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42337</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I think Vader&#039;s point is that if NCIS were at 9 rather than 8 it would be beating TM. Possibly (or even probably) true, but, Vader, does it really matter? Both are among the largest scripted audiences on broadcast TV. Neither are in danger of cancellation any time soon. So why quibble over such a minor thing? It&#039;s not like CBS is killing NCIS by airing it at 8. It&#039;s still flourishing and getting better ratings than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I think Vader&#8217;s point is that if NCIS were at 9 rather than 8 it would be beating TM. Possibly (or even probably) true, but, Vader, does it really matter? Both are among the largest scripted audiences on broadcast TV. Neither are in danger of cancellation any time soon. So why quibble over such a minor thing? It&#8217;s not like CBS is killing NCIS by airing it at 8. It&#8217;s still flourishing and getting better ratings than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42336</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42336</guid>
		<description>[Said with correct grammar]

Vader,

I&#039;m assuming you’re questioning TM beating NCIS? When you average the hour for NCIS, it comes in a little lower that TM’s average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Said with correct grammar]</p>
<p>Vader,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you’re questioning TM beating NCIS? When you average the hour for NCIS, it comes in a little lower that TM’s average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42335</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42335</guid>
		<description>Vader,

I assuming you&#039;re question TM beating NCIS? When you average the hour for NCIS, it comes in a little lower that TM&#039;s average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vader,</p>
<p>I assuming you&#8217;re question TM beating NCIS? When you average the hour for NCIS, it comes in a little lower that TM&#8217;s average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42334</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42334</guid>
		<description>Andrea, considering that&#039;s better retention out of Idol than nearly anything else, I&#039;m sure FOX would be very pleased. Pleased enough to tie up that spot next year? Maybe not. If it retains 65% of Idol I see FOX giving it a spot without a House lead in in the fall and seeing how it fairs. If it still needs support, they&#039;ll put it behind Idol again. If not, they&#039;ll let it remain as a moderate hit and use the spot for something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, considering that&#8217;s better retention out of Idol than nearly anything else, I&#8217;m sure FOX would be very pleased. Pleased enough to tie up that spot next year? Maybe not. If it retains 65% of Idol I see FOX giving it a spot without a House lead in in the fall and seeing how it fairs. If it still needs support, they&#8217;ll put it behind Idol again. If not, they&#8217;ll let it remain as a moderate hit and use the spot for something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42333</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42333</guid>
		<description>What numbers are you people looking at? NCIS pulled better numbers in its second half than the Mentalist pulled all night. In fact, the only reason NCIS had such low numbers in its first half hour is because it comes on at 8. Reminds me of what I said two months ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What numbers are you people looking at? NCIS pulled better numbers in its second half than the Mentalist pulled all night. In fact, the only reason NCIS had such low numbers in its first half hour is because it comes on at 8. Reminds me of what I said two months ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42332</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42332</guid>
		<description>JT and everyone:

General question: Say that American Idol averages 23 million on Tuesdays and Fringe retains 65% of that, which is roughly 15 million viewers. 

Of course, 15 million would be nearly double Fringe&#039;s current numbers, but when tied to AI is 65% good enough? What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT and everyone:</p>
<p>General question: Say that American Idol averages 23 million on Tuesdays and Fringe retains 65% of that, which is roughly 15 million viewers. </p>
<p>Of course, 15 million would be nearly double Fringe&#8217;s current numbers, but when tied to AI is 65% good enough? What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42331</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42331</guid>
		<description>Surprisingly nice for Scrubs. Much better than I was expecting, though my expectations were so low that a repeat of According to Jim could have beaten them. Now I just have to watch the episode and see if they&#039;ve fixed anything from last season. (Too bad ABC doesn&#039;t use Hulu so I can watch it legally, since the abc.com viewer sucks so bad.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly nice for Scrubs. Much better than I was expecting, though my expectations were so low that a repeat of According to Jim could have beaten them. Now I just have to watch the episode and see if they&#8217;ve fixed anything from last season. (Too bad ABC doesn&#8217;t use Hulu so I can watch it legally, since the abc.com viewer sucks so bad.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42330</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42330</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I think you and I have a different interpretation about how &quot;salesmanship&quot; works internally and externally.  Though then again Reilly&#039;s recent public comments about Dollhouse didn&#039;t smack of salesmanship...at all.  But they were well after the upfronts which are nothing but a sales pitch.  

Then again compared to TSCC or something like the cancelled New Amsterdam, Fox could already claim Fringe a tentpole show and almost do it with a completely straight face!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I think you and I have a different interpretation about how &#8220;salesmanship&#8221; works internally and externally.  Though then again Reilly&#8217;s recent public comments about Dollhouse didn&#8217;t smack of salesmanship&#8230;at all.  But they were well after the upfronts which are nothing but a sales pitch.  </p>
<p>Then again compared to TSCC or something like the cancelled New Amsterdam, Fox could already claim Fringe a tentpole show and almost do it with a completely straight face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42329</guid>
		<description>Robert,

A lot of my preconceptions of FOX&#039;s expectations came from the upfronts.

From the upfronts live blog (New York Times):

&quot;I’m confident this [Fringe] will become the next tentpole show for Fox.”--Kevin Reilly

http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/upfronts-live-blogging-the-fox-upfront/?pagemode=print


Now when I think of &quot;tentpole&quot;, and Wikipedia backs this up, I think of a show that brings in huge viewership and demo numbers, can stand on its own, and can be a strong lead-in for fledgling shows. For example, House is a tentpole show for FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>A lot of my preconceptions of FOX&#8217;s expectations came from the upfronts.</p>
<p>From the upfronts live blog (New York Times):</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m confident this [Fringe] will become the next tentpole show for Fox.”&#8211;Kevin Reilly</p>
<p><a href="http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/upfronts-live-blogging-the-fox-upfront/?pagemode=print" rel="nofollow">http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/upfronts-live-blogging-the-fox-upfront/?pagemode=print</a></p>
<p>Now when I think of &#8220;tentpole&#8221;, and Wikipedia backs this up, I think of a show that brings in huge viewership and demo numbers, can stand on its own, and can be a strong lead-in for fledgling shows. For example, House is a tentpole show for FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42328</link>
		<dc:creator>David S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42328</guid>
		<description>I think american idol is going to drop significantly in viewers this year. Sure it will win the demos but this season will mark the beginning of the end for the series. It is going to drop hard and fast. That is my prediction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think american idol is going to drop significantly in viewers this year. Sure it will win the demos but this season will mark the beginning of the end for the series. It is going to drop hard and fast. That is my prediction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-2/#comment-42326</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42326</guid>
		<description>NCIS is a really interesting story to me, now that I&#039;ve been following the ratings game for a while.  Its repeat episodes do almost as well as its new episodes.  Its syndicated old seasons on USA and Ion Television do really well for those networks, apparently.  And the show keeps adding viewers each season.  None of those things are typical behavior.

Is it just the highly serialized approach to the show?  Or does it say something about how the 18-49 demo approaches things?  NCIS was always an older-skewing audience, but perhaps all the repeats and syndication finally lured younger viewers to start watching it, after which they started watching new eps too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCIS is a really interesting story to me, now that I&#8217;ve been following the ratings game for a while.  Its repeat episodes do almost as well as its new episodes.  Its syndicated old seasons on USA and Ion Television do really well for those networks, apparently.  And the show keeps adding viewers each season.  None of those things are typical behavior.</p>
<p>Is it just the highly serialized approach to the show?  Or does it say something about how the 18-49 demo approaches things?  NCIS was always an older-skewing audience, but perhaps all the repeats and syndication finally lured younger viewers to start watching it, after which they started watching new eps too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-1/#comment-42324</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42324</guid>
		<description>I agree JT but i don&#039;t think that the Mentalist will get 18-20 more like 18-19 possilbly a tiny bit into the top 17&#039;s. It still has people that come in from lead-ins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree JT but i don&#8217;t think that the Mentalist will get 18-20 more like 18-19 possilbly a tiny bit into the top 17&#8242;s. It still has people that come in from lead-ins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-1/#comment-42321</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42321</guid>
		<description>ABC has got to be satisfied with &quot;Homeland Security&quot;...did they expect more than a 2.2 rating?  Perhaps, but 7.8 million viewers and a 2.3 18/49 is a big improvement over the fall, that&#039;s for sure.  Also, the fact that it grew in the hour is encouraging.  ABC should be especially pleased with &quot;Scrubs&quot;.  The 3.1/3.2 that the two episodes of &quot;Scrubs&quot; is pretty decent considering how ABC has done on Tuesdays previously.

&quot;The Mentalist&quot; is a ridiculously huge hit, which is good for network TV!  I&#039;m going to bet that CBS is going to win the total viewer race on Tuesdays even after Fox brings back American Idol. 

Here is my prediction:  Fox will get about 22-24 million viewers from 8-9 with AI, and at 9 &quot;Fringe&quot; will start averaging 12-13 million viewers with the huge lead in. I&#039;m thinking CBS will get 16-18 million for NCIS and probably 18-20 million for The Mentalist.  Fox will still dominate in the 18/49 race.

Anyone care to challenge my prediction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC has got to be satisfied with &#8220;Homeland Security&#8221;&#8230;did they expect more than a 2.2 rating?  Perhaps, but 7.8 million viewers and a 2.3 18/49 is a big improvement over the fall, that&#8217;s for sure.  Also, the fact that it grew in the hour is encouraging.  ABC should be especially pleased with &#8220;Scrubs&#8221;.  The 3.1/3.2 that the two episodes of &#8220;Scrubs&#8221; is pretty decent considering how ABC has done on Tuesdays previously.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Mentalist&#8221; is a ridiculously huge hit, which is good for network TV!  I&#8217;m going to bet that CBS is going to win the total viewer race on Tuesdays even after Fox brings back American Idol. </p>
<p>Here is my prediction:  Fox will get about 22-24 million viewers from 8-9 with AI, and at 9 &#8220;Fringe&#8221; will start averaging 12-13 million viewers with the huge lead in. I&#8217;m thinking CBS will get 16-18 million for NCIS and probably 18-20 million for The Mentalist.  Fox will still dominate in the 18/49 race.</p>
<p>Anyone care to challenge my prediction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-1/#comment-42319</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42319</guid>
		<description>Gotta say that although Scrubs has been low for veiwership for ABC, i&#039;d say it will be like 4th/5th for ABC in 18-49 scripted and like 7/8th over all. So i&#039;d say it started out good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta say that although Scrubs has been low for veiwership for ABC, i&#8217;d say it will be like 4th/5th for ABC in 18-49 scripted and like 7/8th over all. So i&#8217;d say it started out good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-1/#comment-42317</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42317</guid>
		<description>Kathy B., I&#039;d bet *at least* one more season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy B., I&#8217;d bet *at least* one more season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/07/tuesday-ratings-cbs-tops-viewers-nbcs-biggest-loser-lo-svu-weighty-in-the-demos/10272/comment-page-1/#comment-42316</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10272#comment-42316</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree that Fox had huge expectations for Fringe.  High HOPES perhaps, but Fox saw it as an experimental show to begin with -- if Fox thought it was a slam dunk to to sell ads for a show like that, it wouldn&#039;t have gone with it as one of the shows for &quot;remote free&quot; programming.  Fox likely is very enamored with JJ, but the notion that a show called FRINGE could be a huge hit with the mainstream would be delusional on Fox&#039;s part.

My guess is that especially give House&#039;s erosion, Fringe is in line with Fox&#039;s expectations, unless the Fox execs are delusional, which while possible seems doubtful.  If I&#039;m Fox I&#039;m feeling &quot;fine&quot; about Fringe.  Not ecstatic, but fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree that Fox had huge expectations for Fringe.  High HOPES perhaps, but Fox saw it as an experimental show to begin with &#8212; if Fox thought it was a slam dunk to to sell ads for a show like that, it wouldn&#8217;t have gone with it as one of the shows for &#8220;remote free&#8221; programming.  Fox likely is very enamored with JJ, but the notion that a show called FRINGE could be a huge hit with the mainstream would be delusional on Fox&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>My guess is that especially give House&#8217;s erosion, Fringe is in line with Fox&#8217;s expectations, unless the Fox execs are delusional, which while possible seems doubtful.  If I&#8217;m Fox I&#8217;m feeling &#8220;fine&#8221; about Fringe.  Not ecstatic, but fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

