<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CW&#039;s Privileged Looks Safe, But Is It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-62522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-62522</guid>
		<description>Priviledged better come back, it was my favorite show!
I didn&#039;t know it was doing so bad );</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priviledged better come back, it was my favorite show!<br />
I didn&#8217;t know it was doing so bad );</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43296</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43296</guid>
		<description>Tyson, it&#039;s far more likely that Smallville won&#039;t want to stick around than CW not wanting to keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyson, it&#8217;s far more likely that Smallville won&#8217;t want to stick around than CW not wanting to keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel P</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43295</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43295</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t we pretty much confirmed that Dawn &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an idiot though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t we pretty much confirmed that Dawn <i>is</i> an idiot though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43294</guid>
		<description>Dawn Ostroff would be an idiot if she didn&#039;t keep Smallville for next year! Huge mistake, without Smallville their network would fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn Ostroff would be an idiot if she didn&#8217;t keep Smallville for next year! Huge mistake, without Smallville their network would fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erum</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43211</link>
		<dc:creator>erum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43211</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a lot of rumors are floating around that Welling has already signed on for S9 or is close to signing. The ball, it seems, is in the CW&#039;s court. However, it seems that the CW is more interested in &quot;Women/18-34&quot; and not an overall demographic of &quot;All Viewers/18-49&quot;. So even if &quot;SV&quot; is scoring high with this demo, it could be more men than women &amp; then I think the CW would think the expense of the show is not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a lot of rumors are floating around that Welling has already signed on for S9 or is close to signing. The ball, it seems, is in the CW&#8217;s court. However, it seems that the CW is more interested in &#8220;Women/18-34&#8243; and not an overall demographic of &#8220;All Viewers/18-49&#8243;. So even if &#8220;SV&#8221; is scoring high with this demo, it could be more men than women &amp; then I think the CW would think the expense of the show is not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriela</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43182</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43182</guid>
		<description>&quot;IF he didn&#039;t do it already&quot; its what I meant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IF he didn&#8217;t do it already&#8221; its what I meant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriela</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43181</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43181</guid>
		<description>Sue appreantly Tom is close to sign of he dodn&#039;t do it already....it all deppends of the Ostroff...which when her track of &quot;great mannagement decisions&quot; its not a good sign.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue appreantly Tom is close to sign of he dodn&#8217;t do it already&#8230;.it all deppends of the Ostroff&#8230;which when her track of &#8220;great mannagement decisions&#8221; its not a good sign&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43164</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43164</guid>
		<description>Total viewers numbers are meaningless in terms of a show&#039;s advertising success. Usually the 18-49 adults number is the best indication, but for the CW adults 18-34 is likely the best. Unfortunately, we do not see season to date average number for 18-34, only 18-49.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total viewers numbers are meaningless in terms of a show&#8217;s advertising success. Usually the 18-49 adults number is the best indication, but for the CW adults 18-34 is likely the best. Unfortunately, we do not see season to date average number for 18-34, only 18-49.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy B.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43152</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43152</guid>
		<description>digdug, I believe 90210 is beating Supernatural in the demos listed not in total viewers.  Supernatural has been doing very well in total viewers this year, relatively speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>digdug, I believe 90210 is beating Supernatural in the demos listed not in total viewers.  Supernatural has been doing very well in total viewers this year, relatively speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digdug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43141</link>
		<dc:creator>digdug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43141</guid>
		<description>I am shocked that 90210 is beating &quot;Supernatural&quot;.  I don&#039;t watch either show, but I remember that &quot;Supernatural&quot; fans used to be rabid, and the 1st two eps of 90210 were inane.  What happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked that 90210 is beating &#8220;Supernatural&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t watch either show, but I remember that &#8220;Supernatural&#8221; fans used to be rabid, and the 1st two eps of 90210 were inane.  What happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne P</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43110</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43110</guid>
		<description>I hope to see Privileged, Sylista, and of course,  SUPERNATURAL! next season. I had no idea how 90210 was doing....bit surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to see Privileged, Sylista, and of course,  SUPERNATURAL! next season. I had no idea how 90210 was doing&#8230;.bit surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy B.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43108</guid>
		<description>I read that Tom welling has been offered an increase in pay to stay for an additional year on Smallville.  Don&#039;t know if he&#039;s interested but the CW needs something it can call a hit to launch next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that Tom welling has been offered an increase in pay to stay for an additional year on Smallville.  Don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;s interested but the CW needs something it can call a hit to launch next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43104</guid>
		<description>Sue, our Renew/Cancel chart can&#039;t take into account non-ratings factors that effect the decision making process at the networks/shows. There are a number of those factors that might spell the end for Smallville, but on ratings alone it&#039;s solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue, our Renew/Cancel chart can&#8217;t take into account non-ratings factors that effect the decision making process at the networks/shows. There are a number of those factors that might spell the end for Smallville, but on ratings alone it&#8217;s solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-43097</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-43097</guid>
		<description>I thought Tom Wellings contract was up after 8 seasons of Smallville. I am a fan of the show and would watch season 9, but is season 9 possible?  It sure looks like a steep climb for the CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Tom Wellings contract was up after 8 seasons of Smallville. I am a fan of the show and would watch season 9, but is season 9 possible?  It sure looks like a steep climb for the CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-42975</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-42975</guid>
		<description>johnthemon, I plead headline discretion. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johnthemon, I plead headline discretion. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-42973</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-42973</guid>
		<description>maybe I missed something, but to me Privileged does not look safe. It looks just a bit away from being safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe I missed something, but to me Privileged does not look safe. It looks just a bit away from being safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-42927</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-42927</guid>
		<description>Jack, it&#039;s a fair question in terms of the CW, but we don&#039;t regularly see season-to-date info for 18-34, let alone 18-34 year old women.  We could attempt to track it down, but because we&#039;re comparing the CW only to the CW and the 18-49 average seems a good predictor -- even for the CW, it doesn&#039;t seem worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, it&#8217;s a fair question in terms of the CW, but we don&#8217;t regularly see season-to-date info for 18-34, let alone 18-34 year old women.  We could attempt to track it down, but because we&#8217;re comparing the CW only to the CW and the 18-49 average seems a good predictor &#8212; even for the CW, it doesn&#8217;t seem worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/10/cws-privileged-looks-safe-but-is-it-really/10599/comment-page-1/#comment-42926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10599#comment-42926</guid>
		<description>Now that you&#039;ve broken the nets into separate posts, any chance you&#039;ll include 18-34 data in the CW entries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you&#8217;ve broken the nets into separate posts, any chance you&#8217;ll include 18-34 data in the CW entries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

