<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Ratings: CBS News with Katie Couric...LOST!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46272</guid>
		<description>old christine usually pulls in the a similar amount of viewers for new and repeat episodes, which is usually between 6 to 8 million. but stupid Katie Couric knocked down the numbers. old chrisitne should move back to mondays  where it belong. the only reason they put it their is for gary unmarried and now both shows are a disaster. and i cant believe a repeat of Privileged actually beat a repeat of 90210. usually Privileged, reruns and new epsiodes fall behind 90210. both all the shows have crappy numbers anyway but, 90210 and old christine are the only one i truly care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old christine usually pulls in the a similar amount of viewers for new and repeat episodes, which is usually between 6 to 8 million. but stupid Katie Couric knocked down the numbers. old chrisitne should move back to mondays  where it belong. the only reason they put it their is for gary unmarried and now both shows are a disaster. and i cant believe a repeat of Privileged actually beat a repeat of 90210. usually Privileged, reruns and new epsiodes fall behind 90210. both all the shows have crappy numbers anyway but, 90210 and old christine are the only one i truly care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Figtoria</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46166</link>
		<dc:creator>Figtoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46166</guid>
		<description>I love Life on Mars.  I hope they don&#039;t give up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Life on Mars.  I hope they don&#8217;t give up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46137</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46137</guid>
		<description>Delayed due to Nielsen testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delayed due to Nielsen testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaela</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46134</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46134</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s Thursday numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Thursday numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46115</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46115</guid>
		<description>Boston Legal was cancelled in the sense that ABC did not want it to have a fifth season at all, but let DEK talk them into it in return for the US rights to Life on Mars (which ABC did not like in the FOX/Kelly-version - oh, the lolz, looking at the ratings now). It was not a creative decision to end it, DEK would have kept it going and indeed very much did not feel like the S4 finale was a good series finale, hence the fighting for it. Bottom line: totally schmidt-canned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boston Legal was cancelled in the sense that ABC did not want it to have a fifth season at all, but let DEK talk them into it in return for the US rights to Life on Mars (which ABC did not like in the FOX/Kelly-version &#8211; oh, the lolz, looking at the ratings now). It was not a creative decision to end it, DEK would have kept it going and indeed very much did not feel like the S4 finale was a good series finale, hence the fighting for it. Bottom line: totally schmidt-canned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46099</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46099</guid>
		<description>i only enjoy Idol when Paula is upbeat and active (like she was in jacksonville and louisville). In the 2 latest episodes, SF and NYC, shes been looking miserable and shes been very quiet. as a result- the whole freakin show becomes less enjoyable. that show really goes Up and Down with her!! the new judge... forget about it. none of the fans like her. and the buzz on the internet goes up 1000 % after paula has had a good episode... and down with just as much when shes been quiet. she really is very important for american idol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i only enjoy Idol when Paula is upbeat and active (like she was in jacksonville and louisville). In the 2 latest episodes, SF and NYC, shes been looking miserable and shes been very quiet. as a result- the whole freakin show becomes less enjoyable. that show really goes Up and Down with her!! the new judge&#8230; forget about it. none of the fans like her. and the buzz on the internet goes up 1000 % after paula has had a good episode&#8230; and down with just as much when shes been quiet. she really is very important for american idol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokerface</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46087</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokerface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46087</guid>
		<description>Paul, a telenovela is nothing more than a Soap Opera and they already have those during daytime (GH, DOOL, Y&amp;R, GL, etc.)

Just like the soaps, the telenovelas have overacting, over-the-top dramatic stories, etc.  It&#039;s been a while, though, since the last I saw a &quot;love story&quot; develop in Prime Time. 

The only difference is that Latin American telenovelas have a strict period of time, between 3-6 months. If it&#039;s a hit, maybe up to a year.  But american soaps are endless and have lasted about 40 years.

The telenovelas are hits in third-world countries where people are mostly working-class with nothing to do but watch TV at night (I grew up in Panama so I know), and a lot of people specially children grow up with that telenovela culture in their heads (trying to marry a rich person, that there&#039;s evil people, etc)

The american version of Ugly Betty is everything but a telenovela even though the original UB was a colombian telenovela that ran for about a year and at the end of it Betty married her boss (and was all beautiful)

When a Telenovela is a total success (like in the case of RBD in Mexico or Patito Feo in Argentina) they are given series-status and start going into seasons, pretty much like the US.

Back to the ratings, it was expected that Life on Mars would crash, given that 6 week break and the change in time slot. It didn&#039;t even give the show time to create a following.

American Idol... nope, it&#039;s going nowhere.

ABCFanatic, UB is definitely getting a 4th season, I have the feeling that the show will not &quot;return&quot; in June as they say.  They will send off the 3rd season in late march and then won&#039;t return until the fall.  Airing shelved episodes during the summer would be the kiss of death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, a telenovela is nothing more than a Soap Opera and they already have those during daytime (GH, DOOL, Y&amp;R, GL, etc.)</p>
<p>Just like the soaps, the telenovelas have overacting, over-the-top dramatic stories, etc.  It&#8217;s been a while, though, since the last I saw a &#8220;love story&#8221; develop in Prime Time. </p>
<p>The only difference is that Latin American telenovelas have a strict period of time, between 3-6 months. If it&#8217;s a hit, maybe up to a year.  But american soaps are endless and have lasted about 40 years.</p>
<p>The telenovelas are hits in third-world countries where people are mostly working-class with nothing to do but watch TV at night (I grew up in Panama so I know), and a lot of people specially children grow up with that telenovela culture in their heads (trying to marry a rich person, that there&#8217;s evil people, etc)</p>
<p>The american version of Ugly Betty is everything but a telenovela even though the original UB was a colombian telenovela that ran for about a year and at the end of it Betty married her boss (and was all beautiful)</p>
<p>When a Telenovela is a total success (like in the case of RBD in Mexico or Patito Feo in Argentina) they are given series-status and start going into seasons, pretty much like the US.</p>
<p>Back to the ratings, it was expected that Life on Mars would crash, given that 6 week break and the change in time slot. It didn&#8217;t even give the show time to create a following.</p>
<p>American Idol&#8230; nope, it&#8217;s going nowhere.</p>
<p>ABCFanatic, UB is definitely getting a 4th season, I have the feeling that the show will not &#8220;return&#8221; in June as they say.  They will send off the 3rd season in late march and then won&#8217;t return until the fall.  Airing shelved episodes during the summer would be the kiss of death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46086</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46086</guid>
		<description>And holy cow, did I ever botch the spelling of Ugly Betty...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And holy cow, did I ever botch the spelling of Ugly Betty&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46085</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46085</guid>
		<description>I think it would be foolish to cancel Ugly Better so close to the magic syndication number, and the fact that it&#039;s not like it&#039;s doing terrible, which all those shows did. Was Boston Legal really cancelled though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be foolish to cancel Ugly Better so close to the magic syndication number, and the fact that it&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s doing terrible, which all those shows did. Was Boston Legal really cancelled though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanatic2009</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46081</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanatic2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46081</guid>
		<description>*are living</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*are living</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanatic2009</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-7/#comment-46080</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanatic2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46080</guid>
		<description>Oops! you&#039;re wrong unknown

ABC cancelled
1st- Opportunity Knocks
2nd- Boston Legal (the only one which all the episodes aired)
3rd- Eli Stone
4th- Pushing Daisies
5th- Dirty Sexy Money
6th- According to Jim

Life on Mars and Ugly Betty is living on a balance! I hope they save them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! you&#8217;re wrong unknown</p>
<p>ABC cancelled<br />
1st- Opportunity Knocks<br />
2nd- Boston Legal (the only one which all the episodes aired)<br />
3rd- Eli Stone<br />
4th- Pushing Daisies<br />
5th- Dirty Sexy Money<br />
6th- According to Jim</p>
<p>Life on Mars and Ugly Betty is living on a balance! I hope they save them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknown</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46078</link>
		<dc:creator>Unknown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46078</guid>
		<description>Good for Lost. Not only this season has been incredible, Its holding very well. Looks like Life on Mars is the 4th show ABC is gonna cancel. I still say Pushing Daisies should have been kept and get the Lost Lead in. I have a feeling lost fans may like PD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Lost. Not only this season has been incredible, Its holding very well. Looks like Life on Mars is the 4th show ABC is gonna cancel. I still say Pushing Daisies should have been kept and get the Lost Lead in. I have a feeling lost fans may like PD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanatic2009</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46071</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanatic2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46071</guid>
		<description>Gahhh I hate the ratings of Life on Mars.

I wish and wish Ugly Betty and Life on Mars will get a new season those shows are way better than BROTHERS&amp;SISTERS/PRIVATEPRACTICE!.

I think Lost will get 8 million this season, but I love LOST 4EVER

I hate FOX seriously! How can Fringe and Lie to Me get more than 10 million its just bizarre especially they&#039;re a lead-in of American Idol which is the most overrated show ever!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gahhh I hate the ratings of Life on Mars.</p>
<p>I wish and wish Ugly Betty and Life on Mars will get a new season those shows are way better than BROTHERS&amp;SISTERS/PRIVATEPRACTICE!.</p>
<p>I think Lost will get 8 million this season, but I love LOST 4EVER</p>
<p>I hate FOX seriously! How can Fringe and Lie to Me get more than 10 million its just bizarre especially they&#8217;re a lead-in of American Idol which is the most overrated show ever!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46069</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46069</guid>
		<description>Holly - you are dead-on with LTM.  It&#039;s a little early to tell how it will fare.

Robert - dragging us off the Wednesday ratings topic again, I agree with your critique of Fringe.  John Noble is brilliant - he&#039;s got Walter Bishop pulling off this insane-yet-adorable vibe not quite like anything I&#039;ve ever seen before.  Joshua Jackson has really stepped up too.  Sad that Ms. Torv is the &quot;weak link.&quot;

Nick C - you can complain all you want about Fringe&#039;s poorly-written scripts, in the classical sense.  Plenty of people complain about Jack Kerouac, Hunter S. Thompson, e.e. cummings, yadda yadda yadda...their works would be considered poor by schoolbook standards.  Yet each of them is considered a true artist.  Sticking to the form one learns in school may result in technically perfect - but dreadfully boring - writing.  And if your intention is series reviews, not ratings analysis, why not direct your comments to TV Guide or similar entertainment-based sites ;) ?

Julia - thanks a million for the Hulu tipoff!  My DirecTV is out yet again tonight - no Burn Notice, Booooo DirecTV! - so off I go to watch Hulu :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly &#8211; you are dead-on with LTM.  It&#8217;s a little early to tell how it will fare.</p>
<p>Robert &#8211; dragging us off the Wednesday ratings topic again, I agree with your critique of Fringe.  John Noble is brilliant &#8211; he&#8217;s got Walter Bishop pulling off this insane-yet-adorable vibe not quite like anything I&#8217;ve ever seen before.  Joshua Jackson has really stepped up too.  Sad that Ms. Torv is the &#8220;weak link.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nick C &#8211; you can complain all you want about Fringe&#8217;s poorly-written scripts, in the classical sense.  Plenty of people complain about Jack Kerouac, Hunter S. Thompson, e.e. cummings, yadda yadda yadda&#8230;their works would be considered poor by schoolbook standards.  Yet each of them is considered a true artist.  Sticking to the form one learns in school may result in technically perfect &#8211; but dreadfully boring &#8211; writing.  And if your intention is series reviews, not ratings analysis, why not direct your comments to TV Guide or similar entertainment-based sites <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
<p>Julia &#8211; thanks a million for the Hulu tipoff!  My DirecTV is out yet again tonight &#8211; no Burn Notice, Booooo DirecTV! &#8211; so off I go to watch Hulu <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46067</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46067</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You know it’s intereesting that every American Idol episode this season has seen an increase over Tuesday. I smell a new trend in the series…&lt;/i&gt;

Well, 2/3 is &lt;i&gt;nearly&lt;/i&gt; every episode. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You know it’s intereesting that every American Idol episode this season has seen an increase over Tuesday. I smell a new trend in the series…</i></p>
<p>Well, 2/3 is <i>nearly</i> every episode. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandalfxj9</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46066</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandalfxj9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46066</guid>
		<description>You know it&#039;s intereesting that every American Idol episode this season has seen an increase over Tuesday.  I smell a new trend in the series...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it&#8217;s intereesting that every American Idol episode this season has seen an increase over Tuesday.  I smell a new trend in the series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46065</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46065</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s still a little early to say whether FOX is happy with LTM. It beat Lost in total viewers, but lost in the demo. When Criminal Minds comes back, CM will definitely beat LTM in total viewers and will probably take away some of its demo viewers. It could be a dead-heat between those two for second in the demo. 

Of course, when LTM moves to 8, everything changes. It will have a lot less competition, but it will also loose it&#039;s 27 million viewer lead-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s still a little early to say whether FOX is happy with LTM. It beat Lost in total viewers, but lost in the demo. When Criminal Minds comes back, CM will definitely beat LTM in total viewers and will probably take away some of its demo viewers. It could be a dead-heat between those two for second in the demo. </p>
<p>Of course, when LTM moves to 8, everything changes. It will have a lot less competition, but it will also loose it&#8217;s 27 million viewer lead-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46063</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46063</guid>
		<description>Yay, Lie to Me won it&#039;s time slot in total viewers! Awesome, I love this show. I&#039;m glad that it beat LOST in total viewers as well.

Do you think FOX is happy with the ratings for Lie to Me? I think so. I mean, the show beat LOST!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, Lie to Me won it&#8217;s time slot in total viewers! Awesome, I love this show. I&#8217;m glad that it beat LOST in total viewers as well.</p>
<p>Do you think FOX is happy with the ratings for Lie to Me? I think so. I mean, the show beat LOST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46058</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46058</guid>
		<description>Robert, what axe do I have to grind?  I&#039;ve never once had a problem with a canceled show being canceled from straight up not having viewers.  I have issues with idiot Network execs like BS and DO because they can&#039;t run a network well.  Both have destroyed what was there before them.  My opinion on JERICHO being good, is that.  It was good.  It wasn&#039;t right for CBS, but I understand that decision.  They greenlit a GOOD show, and they knew it was good.  They also knew it didn&#039;t fit their normal viewing audience so it was a risk.  I know JJ doesn&#039;t write well according to what you learn in school about script writing.  I point out his &quot;don&#039;ts,&quot; that he does all the time.  It doesn&#039;t stop his work from entertaining me, but it COULD be a lot better.  Still his bad is better than a lot of people&#039;s good, so I keep watching.

I still think you took my statements about JERICHO and Sunday wrong.  I said what was going on, not what I believe would happen.  Kind of like TSCC and DOLLHOUSE I state what is going on, not what I believe will happen (I doubt both will have trouble getting 4.5M viewers and by result be canned).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, what axe do I have to grind?  I&#8217;ve never once had a problem with a canceled show being canceled from straight up not having viewers.  I have issues with idiot Network execs like BS and DO because they can&#8217;t run a network well.  Both have destroyed what was there before them.  My opinion on JERICHO being good, is that.  It was good.  It wasn&#8217;t right for CBS, but I understand that decision.  They greenlit a GOOD show, and they knew it was good.  They also knew it didn&#8217;t fit their normal viewing audience so it was a risk.  I know JJ doesn&#8217;t write well according to what you learn in school about script writing.  I point out his &#8220;don&#8217;ts,&#8221; that he does all the time.  It doesn&#8217;t stop his work from entertaining me, but it COULD be a lot better.  Still his bad is better than a lot of people&#8217;s good, so I keep watching.</p>
<p>I still think you took my statements about JERICHO and Sunday wrong.  I said what was going on, not what I believe would happen.  Kind of like TSCC and DOLLHOUSE I state what is going on, not what I believe will happen (I doubt both will have trouble getting 4.5M viewers and by result be canned).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard less</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46057</link>
		<dc:creator>richard less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46057</guid>
		<description>Two Iders:

1. How is Knight Rider still on? Didn&#039;t Ford just lose billions this past quarter...their weekly hour advertisement was a waste of money. 

2. Lie to Me is a horrible title for the show. The concept is good, but that title...yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Iders:</p>
<p>1. How is Knight Rider still on? Didn&#8217;t Ford just lose billions this past quarter&#8230;their weekly hour advertisement was a waste of money. </p>
<p>2. Lie to Me is a horrible title for the show. The concept is good, but that title&#8230;yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starmud</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46055</link>
		<dc:creator>starmud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46055</guid>
		<description>abc has had many chances with a handful of shows, from this season and the past few seasons, they&#039;ve handled many of them very poorly, which makes me question abcs current ability to farm a new hit show unless they get lucky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abc has had many chances with a handful of shows, from this season and the past few seasons, they&#8217;ve handled many of them very poorly, which makes me question abcs current ability to farm a new hit show unless they get lucky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46054</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46054</guid>
		<description>Julia, you may rest something, but I guess you call it a case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, you may rest something, but I guess you call it a case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46052</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46052</guid>
		<description>Long day, so I apologize for not reading too many other posts. I noticed the 18-49 dropoff from eight to nine last night was 45% or so. Question: Doesn&#039;t this make that hour less valuable to advertisors? If not, then the demo stuff is adman jive. As for ABC, their real trouble is and has always been that they have never owned lucrative local stations. NBC by that standard will never truly be third except in quality. They used to say in the fifties, owning local stations is a license to print money. When the old Dumont net went belly up, ABC got the leftovers, sort of like an expansion baseball team. ABC is in more trouble than most people realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long day, so I apologize for not reading too many other posts. I noticed the 18-49 dropoff from eight to nine last night was 45% or so. Question: Doesn&#8217;t this make that hour less valuable to advertisors? If not, then the demo stuff is adman jive. As for ABC, their real trouble is and has always been that they have never owned lucrative local stations. NBC by that standard will never truly be third except in quality. They used to say in the fifties, owning local stations is a license to print money. When the old Dumont net went belly up, ABC got the leftovers, sort of like an expansion baseball team. ABC is in more trouble than most people realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46051</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46051</guid>
		<description>Someone can tell why CBS don&#039;t air a few episodes of How I Met Your Mother after two and a Half Men?

In the past years I see a lot of sitcoms in this spot and all failled...

But the only two sitcoms that CBS can trust don&#039;t have a chance??!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone can tell why CBS don&#8217;t air a few episodes of How I Met Your Mother after two and a Half Men?</p>
<p>In the past years I see a lot of sitcoms in this spot and all failled&#8230;</p>
<p>But the only two sitcoms that CBS can trust don&#8217;t have a chance??!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46048</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46048</guid>
		<description>Life on Mars drop to 2.1 in the demo in the finals.  Lost climbed to 4.9, .1 behind the Season Premiere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life on Mars drop to 2.1 in the demo in the finals.  Lost climbed to 4.9, .1 behind the Season Premiere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46044</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46044</guid>
		<description>Try sticking site:tvbythenumbers.com into your search. That will ONLY search this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try sticking site:tvbythenumbers.com into your search. That will ONLY search this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam1thering</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46043</link>
		<dc:creator>sam1thering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46043</guid>
		<description>CBS is way better off with Gary Unmarried and this just goes to show it, if CBS wants to keep up with AI Lost and Lie too me, they better cut the expirements and get serious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS is way better off with Gary Unmarried and this just goes to show it, if CBS wants to keep up with AI Lost and Lie too me, they better cut the expirements and get serious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46042</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46042</guid>
		<description>Google actually picks up this site extremely well -- it just depends on what you&#039;re searching for. &lt;i&gt;chuck 3d glasses superbowl&lt;/i&gt; works better than &lt;i&gt;gossip girl ratings&lt;/i&gt; but it&#039;s also more specific.

In our admin tools it&#039;s very easy for us to search the comments, but the site search doesn&#039;t pick it up, and in order to find your comments via google you&#039;d need to search on something like &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS245US246&amp;q=+site:tvbythenumbers.com+fox+new+amsterdam+andrea+tvbythenumbers.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fox new amsterdam andrea tvbythenumbers.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google actually picks up this site extremely well &#8212; it just depends on what you&#8217;re searching for. <i>chuck 3d glasses superbowl</i> works better than <i>gossip girl ratings</i> but it&#8217;s also more specific.</p>
<p>In our admin tools it&#8217;s very easy for us to search the comments, but the site search doesn&#8217;t pick it up, and in order to find your comments via google you&#8217;d need to search on something like <i><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS245US246&#038;q=+site:tvbythenumbers.com+fox+new+amsterdam+andrea+tvbythenumbers.com" rel="nofollow">fox new amsterdam andrea tvbythenumbers.com</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46041</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46041</guid>
		<description>I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46039</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46039</guid>
		<description>Robert,

Thanks. Google doesn&#039;t seem to pick up this site very well (in the news it doesn&#039;t by not for regular searches).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Thanks. Google doesn&#8217;t seem to pick up this site very well (in the news it doesn&#8217;t by not for regular searches).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-6/#comment-46037</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46037</guid>
		<description>Andrea, unfortunately the site search doesn&#039;t work well (or at all) for searching on comments.  and that&#039;s something we do need to figure out.  for now, the best bet is to do google searches on particular searches and throw tvbythenumbers.com into your search query -- not really a short-cut, just the shortest one I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, unfortunately the site search doesn&#8217;t work well (or at all) for searching on comments.  and that&#8217;s something we do need to figure out.  for now, the best bet is to do google searches on particular searches and throw tvbythenumbers.com into your search query &#8212; not really a short-cut, just the shortest one I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46035</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46035</guid>
		<description>Julia: Would I be wrong if I gave you as Example A?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia: Would I be wrong if I gave you as Example A?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46034</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46034</guid>
		<description>Holly: I feel left out as well. Maybe we can sign up together! Also, put me on the list to dig up old threads from a year ago. Robert, can you teach me the shortcut?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly: I feel left out as well. Maybe we can sign up together! Also, put me on the list to dig up old threads from a year ago. Robert, can you teach me the shortcut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46033</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46033</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I&#039;m not sure you know what projecting is, or at least you can&#039;t spot it if you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I&#8217;m not sure you know what projecting is, or at least you can&#8217;t spot it if you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46031</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46031</guid>
		<description>I wish they&#039;d all go back to the regular old fall season/holiday hiatus/spring season format.  At this point, if I know in advance that a new show is going to have an eight month hiatus, I&#039;m not watching it. I&#039;ll wait until the series finale and buy the DVDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they&#8217;d all go back to the regular old fall season/holiday hiatus/spring season format.  At this point, if I know in advance that a new show is going to have an eight month hiatus, I&#8217;m not watching it. I&#8217;ll wait until the series finale and buy the DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suki</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46030</link>
		<dc:creator>Suki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46030</guid>
		<description>Holly, I actually think might renew ATJ yet again.  Sounds like the perfect reason for one to find an axe, IMHO. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly, I actually think might renew ATJ yet again.  Sounds like the perfect reason for one to find an axe, IMHO. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46029</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46029</guid>
		<description>Life on Mars is also competing against &quot;Lost,&quot; which has a huge percentage of viewers watching the same night on DVR.   Just speaking for myself, I recorded both &quot;Lost&quot; and &quot;Life on Mars.&quot;   I will get to &quot;Life on Mars&quot; in a few days, but LOST is absolute must-see-same-night viewing.   &quot;Lost&quot; is so rewarding to those 11-14 million of us that never gave up.   We are reaping the rewards of a story beginning to race to its conclusion just 15 months from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life on Mars is also competing against &#8220;Lost,&#8221; which has a huge percentage of viewers watching the same night on DVR.   Just speaking for myself, I recorded both &#8220;Lost&#8221; and &#8220;Life on Mars.&#8221;   I will get to &#8220;Life on Mars&#8221; in a few days, but LOST is absolute must-see-same-night viewing.   &#8220;Lost&#8221; is so rewarding to those 11-14 million of us that never gave up.   We are reaping the rewards of a story beginning to race to its conclusion just 15 months from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocArzt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46027</link>
		<dc:creator>DocArzt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46027</guid>
		<description>When is ABC going to realize that LOST is a horrible lead in.  It leaves viewers way too full.  The first thing you want to do after LOST is shut off the tv and meditate for a while, or hit the message boards, or rewind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is ABC going to realize that LOST is a horrible lead in.  It leaves viewers way too full.  The first thing you want to do after LOST is shut off the tv and meditate for a while, or hit the message boards, or rewind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46026</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46026</guid>
		<description>^Bummer, I had just about decided to start making irrational comments about ABC for canceling my beloved According to Jim (I think I saw an episode once...)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Bummer, I had just about decided to start making irrational comments about ABC for canceling my beloved According to Jim (I think I saw an episode once&#8230;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46025</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46025</guid>
		<description>Noooo! Don&#039;t do it, Holly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo! Don&#8217;t do it, Holly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46024</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46024</guid>
		<description>LOL, denial too?  Now I&#039;m &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/01/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-31-cbs-goes-young-vs-abc/3144&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;projecting via memory&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, denial too?  Now I&#8217;m <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/01/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-31-cbs-goes-young-vs-abc/3144" rel="nofollow">projecting via memory</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46023</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46023</guid>
		<description>I feel left out. I need to find a reason to be pissed off at a network. Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel left out. I need to find a reason to be pissed off at a network. Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46022</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46022</guid>
		<description>Robert, there you go again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, there you go again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46021</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46021</guid>
		<description>uh huh, and you keep on with your fantasy that your don&#039;t emote your ire at Fox cancelling New Amsterdam...without actually saying it.  Whatever you say....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh huh, and you keep on with your fantasy that your don&#8217;t emote your ire at Fox cancelling New Amsterdam&#8230;without actually saying it.  Whatever you say&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46020</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46020</guid>
		<description>&quot;Andrea, I’m aggressive-aggressive. You and Nick have axes to grind, often, that have absolutely nothing to do with the ratings themselves. If you, Nick, or anyone else has a problem with being called out on it — tough. :-D&quot;


And projecting as well...Keep on with your fantasies. They make for nice reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Andrea, I’m aggressive-aggressive. You and Nick have axes to grind, often, that have absolutely nothing to do with the ratings themselves. If you, Nick, or anyone else has a problem with being called out on it — tough. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>And projecting as well&#8230;Keep on with your fantasies. They make for nice reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46017</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46017</guid>
		<description>Suki, I agree, but while I find the axes pretty obvious to spot, they are never (or very close to never) disclosed when the grinding occurs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suki, I agree, but while I find the axes pretty obvious to spot, they are never (or very close to never) disclosed when the grinding occurs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suki</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46016</link>
		<dc:creator>Suki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46016</guid>
		<description>Nowt wrong with having an axe to grind as long as you&#039;re honest about it. :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowt wrong with having an axe to grind as long as you&#8217;re honest about it. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46014</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46014</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I&#039;m aggressive-aggressive. You and Nick have axes to grind, often, that have absolutely nothing to do with the ratings themselves.  If you, Nick, or anyone else has a problem with being called out on it -- tough. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I&#8217;m aggressive-aggressive. You and Nick have axes to grind, often, that have absolutely nothing to do with the ratings themselves.  If you, Nick, or anyone else has a problem with being called out on it &#8212; tough. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46011</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46011</guid>
		<description>Robert, there you go getting all passive aggressive again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, there you go getting all passive aggressive again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/01/29/wednesday-ratings-cbs-news-with-katie-couriclost/11710/comment-page-5/#comment-46010</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11710#comment-46010</guid>
		<description>Whether the lead female is boring is purely subjective.  Personally what makes the show for me character-wise is John Noble as Dr. Walter Bishop.  That his character is more interesting to me than Anna Torv&#039;s is probably &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a great sign for the show and I agree the relationship between the Bishops is more interesting than between Peter and Olivia, and I agree that the show is good, but not WOW.    The most wow scene of the entire run was the opening episode where the animated butterflies attacked.  And *that* probably made people change the channel.  But, all that is also very subjective.

And you didn&#039;t answer the question of whether JJ ran over your dog and whether Dawn Ostroff was in the car with him at the time, dissing Jericho, which you will no doubt have slated for a revival on FOX Fridays after TSCC is cancelled, but, I digress...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether the lead female is boring is purely subjective.  Personally what makes the show for me character-wise is John Noble as Dr. Walter Bishop.  That his character is more interesting to me than Anna Torv&#8217;s is probably <i>not</i> a great sign for the show and I agree the relationship between the Bishops is more interesting than between Peter and Olivia, and I agree that the show is good, but not WOW.    The most wow scene of the entire run was the opening episode where the animated butterflies attacked.  And *that* probably made people change the channel.  But, all that is also very subjective.</p>
<p>And you didn&#8217;t answer the question of whether JJ ran over your dog and whether Dawn Ostroff was in the car with him at the time, dissing Jericho, which you will no doubt have slated for a revival on FOX Fridays after TSCC is cancelled, but, I digress&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

