<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacGruber probably better than the Super Bowl ads this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46822</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46822</guid>
		<description>Hulu&#039;s got my vote for best commercial, with the Jason Statham Audi commercial coming in second. I like car chases. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hulu&#8217;s got my vote for best commercial, with the Jason Statham Audi commercial coming in second. I like car chases. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46821</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46821</guid>
		<description>that commercial wasn&#039;t funny to me.

I liked the commercials for &quot;Hulu&quot;, &quot;Bridgestone&quot;, &quot;Budweiser&quot;, &quot;Monster Job Search&quot;, &quot;Career Builder.com&quot; and &quot;NBC&#039;s Heroes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that commercial wasn&#8217;t funny to me.</p>
<p>I liked the commercials for &#8220;Hulu&#8221;, &#8220;Bridgestone&#8221;, &#8220;Budweiser&#8221;, &#8220;Monster Job Search&#8221;, &#8220;Career Builder.com&#8221; and &#8220;NBC&#8217;s Heroes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macgruber</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46790</link>
		<dc:creator>Macgruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46790</guid>
		<description>[...] MacGruber probably better than the Super Bowl ads this year (tvbythenumbers.com) - February 01, 2009Saturday Night Live&#039;s MacGruber spoof of both MacGyver (with the real Richard Dean Anderson!) and Pepsi was somewhat of an indictment of where TV advertising is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MacGruber probably better than the Super Bowl ads this year (tvbythenumbers.com) &#8211; February 01, 2009Saturday Night Live&#8217;s MacGruber spoof of both MacGyver (with the real Richard Dean Anderson!) and Pepsi was somewhat of an indictment of where TV advertising is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46749</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46749</guid>
		<description>i thought it was really funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought it was really funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Smith</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46732</guid>
		<description>Nice to see RDA again, even if it was just a stupid commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see RDA again, even if it was just a stupid commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46725</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46725</guid>
		<description>I guess it can&#039;t actually be better than the Super Bowl ads if it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a Super Bowl ad!  They just ran the second ad above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it can&#8217;t actually be better than the Super Bowl ads if it <i>is</i> a Super Bowl ad!  They just ran the second ad above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpjam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46714</link>
		<dc:creator>bpjam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46714</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d bet all the money I have (left) that NBC didn&#039;t &#039;sell out all the ads&#039; for the SB.  I bet it sold as many as it could and then filled up the rest with NBC/Universal/USA/Univision/PSA/etc to ensure that commercials do run in between each clock stoppage and time out.  But it sure doesn&#039;t look like there are all that many non-NBC affiliated commercials being aired.  Even during halftime I walked away for 24 minutes and I missed a whopping &#039;1&#039; commercial for an actual advertiser. I TIVOd it back to be sure I hadn&#039;t actually missed something but it was just Springsteen and NBC promos taking up the extra-long halftime.

NBC is just straight up lying.  They claim they are getting $3M for a 30 sec ad but they are probably having to cut deal after deal on the side to get these spots filled.  There is a recession, plus neither of the teams is in a major media market and there are no major stars playing.  (Plus, NBC spent all their production budget on Obama events already and they will be in debt until sometime around 2012).

I don&#039;t know how we can verify what NBC says but I can&#039;t see how NBC could claim to be better off than the guys who lost money last year on the Super Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d bet all the money I have (left) that NBC didn&#8217;t &#8216;sell out all the ads&#8217; for the SB.  I bet it sold as many as it could and then filled up the rest with NBC/Universal/USA/Univision/PSA/etc to ensure that commercials do run in between each clock stoppage and time out.  But it sure doesn&#8217;t look like there are all that many non-NBC affiliated commercials being aired.  Even during halftime I walked away for 24 minutes and I missed a whopping &#8217;1&#8242; commercial for an actual advertiser. I TIVOd it back to be sure I hadn&#8217;t actually missed something but it was just Springsteen and NBC promos taking up the extra-long halftime.</p>
<p>NBC is just straight up lying.  They claim they are getting $3M for a 30 sec ad but they are probably having to cut deal after deal on the side to get these spots filled.  There is a recession, plus neither of the teams is in a major media market and there are no major stars playing.  (Plus, NBC spent all their production budget on Obama events already and they will be in debt until sometime around 2012).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how we can verify what NBC says but I can&#8217;t see how NBC could claim to be better off than the guys who lost money last year on the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46713</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46713</guid>
		<description>I have no problem with this and actually enjoy them. When shows can turn product placement into a joke it can work. Arrested Development did this, Scrubs did this and 30 Rock did this. (I&#039;m sure others have as well.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with this and actually enjoy them. When shows can turn product placement into a joke it can work. Arrested Development did this, Scrubs did this and 30 Rock did this. (I&#8217;m sure others have as well.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpjam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46699</link>
		<dc:creator>bpjam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46699</guid>
		<description>Okay, it was a little over the top.  1st one, funny. 2nd one, more than obvious. 3rd one, just plain &#039;hammer against the cranium&#039; annoying.

Yes, things are changing as consumers get more control over their ability to view entertainment sans infomercials/commercials.  But advertisers can benefit from being smarter and treating consumers less like Gitmo detainees (actually, those people are treated incredibly well compared to cable news viewers) and more like thinking, discerning people who need to buy certain products in good times or bad.

Or they could all just hire Vince from Shamwow or Billy Mays (from everything else)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, it was a little over the top.  1st one, funny. 2nd one, more than obvious. 3rd one, just plain &#8216;hammer against the cranium&#8217; annoying.</p>
<p>Yes, things are changing as consumers get more control over their ability to view entertainment sans infomercials/commercials.  But advertisers can benefit from being smarter and treating consumers less like Gitmo detainees (actually, those people are treated incredibly well compared to cable news viewers) and more like thinking, discerning people who need to buy certain products in good times or bad.</p>
<p>Or they could all just hire Vince from Shamwow or Billy Mays (from everything else)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/01/macgruber-probably-better-than-the-super-bowl-ads-this-year/11919/comment-page-1/#comment-46673</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=11919#comment-46673</guid>
		<description>Ah, the future of advertising in a DVR world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the future of advertising in a DVR world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

