<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Ratings: Super Bowl promotions don&#039;t help NBC&#039;s ratings woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Presidente</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-48794</link>
		<dc:creator>El Presidente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-48794</guid>
		<description>Now Chuck is being screwed by the President! NBC better wake up and remember that it has a good thing going if it would just let its viewers see this show on a consistent basis - anyone know if NBC is planning on putting the show on later tonight or anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Chuck is being screwed by the President! NBC better wake up and remember that it has a good thing going if it would just let its viewers see this show on a consistent basis &#8211; anyone know if NBC is planning on putting the show on later tonight or anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-48242</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-48242</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree, House is getting old when it comes to being interesting...He&#039;s racist, the other character plots have to pick up the slack for it. The only reason I watch the episode the next day on the Fox.com is because Number 13 is smoking. But I stick to Chuck religiously. Just a fun show. Yvonne is also pure wow to the pupils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree, House is getting old when it comes to being interesting&#8230;He&#8217;s racist, the other character plots have to pick up the slack for it. The only reason I watch the episode the next day on the Fox.com is because Number 13 is smoking. But I stick to Chuck religiously. Just a fun show. Yvonne is also pure wow to the pupils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47867</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47867</guid>
		<description>&quot;Alex, I did not say Heores was in danger of being cancelled at any point. I simply pointed out that this demo/total audience ratio you made up is significant of jack shit.&quot;

My comments on the subject of Heroes demo vs. total audience were a response to this from Jennf:

&quot;If you are thinking a 4.0 for Heroes is great let me put it this way…NCIS scored a 4.0 last week…and we all know how much older those viewers are…&quot;

As I said originally its backward logic to try and paint Heroes numbers in a poor light because they&#039;re the same as a show with more than twice its total viewers. And as I went onto say there&#039;s no way people with NBC look at those kind of stats and don&#039;t think &#039;what if...?&#039; in regards to Heroes numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Alex, I did not say Heores was in danger of being cancelled at any point. I simply pointed out that this demo/total audience ratio you made up is significant of jack shit.&#8221;</p>
<p>My comments on the subject of Heroes demo vs. total audience were a response to this from Jennf:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you are thinking a 4.0 for Heroes is great let me put it this way…NCIS scored a 4.0 last week…and we all know how much older those viewers are…&#8221;</p>
<p>As I said originally its backward logic to try and paint Heroes numbers in a poor light because they&#8217;re the same as a show with more than twice its total viewers. And as I went onto say there&#8217;s no way people with NBC look at those kind of stats and don&#8217;t think &#8216;what if&#8230;?&#8217; in regards to Heroes numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47866</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47866</guid>
		<description>Oh my word, im really hoping that this additional episode is not the end :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my word, im really hoping that this additional episode is not the end <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47864</guid>
		<description>Considering the fact that Chuck was up against HOUSE and Big Bang Theory and after about 6 weeks of being off the air had gained an extra million viewers is very promising. I have to admit that if TSCC stayed where it was on Mondays, Chuck probably would have gotten couple more million viewers. Chuck is still in the game. Chucks ratings are not getting any worse - it&#039;s getting gradually better despite the incredible competition with the viewer eating HOUSE. I think this is the worst season creatively for House. It&#039;s the same old house every season and there is no growth for his character. Why is it that people can watch the same old House where Chuck is really creative and fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the fact that Chuck was up against HOUSE and Big Bang Theory and after about 6 weeks of being off the air had gained an extra million viewers is very promising. I have to admit that if TSCC stayed where it was on Mondays, Chuck probably would have gotten couple more million viewers. Chuck is still in the game. Chucks ratings are not getting any worse &#8211; it&#8217;s getting gradually better despite the incredible competition with the viewer eating HOUSE. I think this is the worst season creatively for House. It&#8217;s the same old house every season and there is no growth for his character. Why is it that people can watch the same old House where Chuck is really creative and fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraHOTski</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47862</link>
		<dc:creator>StraHOTski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47862</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for &quot;Who,&quot; the Peacock has opted to keep &quot;Chuck&quot; on its Monday schedule through April 27 while &quot;Deal or No Deal&quot; will take over the 8:00/7:00c hour on May 4, May 11 and May 18.&quot; http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7945

&quot;At NBC, the launch of the network&#039;s version of UK format Who Do You Think You Are? has been delayed indefinitely, as NBC has decided to up its episode order for spy series Chuck. That show will occupy the Monday 20.00 slot through to April 27, and on May 4 it will be replaced by the first episode in a new series of Deal or No Deal.&quot; http://www.c21media.net/news/detail.asp?area=1&amp;article=47440

Is NBC ordering an additional episode of Chuck? Or does this mean that NBC will pre-empt (or show a rerun) one other time so that Heroes&#039; and Chuck&#039;s finale air the same night?

If NBC is ordering an additional episode of Chuck, this may be a bad sign. The additional episode may be to wrap up all the story-lines as a series finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for &#8220;Who,&#8221; the Peacock has opted to keep &#8220;Chuck&#8221; on its Monday schedule through April 27 while &#8220;Deal or No Deal&#8221; will take over the 8:00/7:00c hour on May 4, May 11 and May 18.&#8221; <a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7945" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7945</a></p>
<p>&#8220;At NBC, the launch of the network&#8217;s version of UK format Who Do You Think You Are? has been delayed indefinitely, as NBC has decided to up its episode order for spy series Chuck. That show will occupy the Monday 20.00 slot through to April 27, and on May 4 it will be replaced by the first episode in a new series of Deal or No Deal.&#8221; <a href="http://www.c21media.net/news/detail.asp?area=1&#038;article=47440" rel="nofollow">http://www.c21media.net/news/detail.asp?area=1&#038;article=47440</a></p>
<p>Is NBC ordering an additional episode of Chuck? Or does this mean that NBC will pre-empt (or show a rerun) one other time so that Heroes&#8217; and Chuck&#8217;s finale air the same night?</p>
<p>If NBC is ordering an additional episode of Chuck, this may be a bad sign. The additional episode may be to wrap up all the story-lines as a series finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47836</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47836</guid>
		<description>Weird, only NBC seems to be airing this special. Or maybe they are the only ones who have announced the change so far?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, only NBC seems to be airing this special. Or maybe they are the only ones who have announced the change so far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47833</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47833</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable... I just saw that about the schedule change and hoped it was a mistake.  This is ridiculous.  Two episodes now shown out of order.  And I don&#039;t understand how they can show &quot;Suburbs&quot; and not go straight into the sweeps story arc, its going to be a mess showing &quot;Best Friend&quot; after that.

I can&#039;t imagine how much they&#039;re having to re-shoot or edit.  As it was it was obvious the ending of &quot;3D&quot; was re-shot.  Way to go NBC, ruining every bit of momentum gained from the Super Bowl promotion.

If Chuck can&#039;t get traction after this mess it&#039;ll be a frakking shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable&#8230; I just saw that about the schedule change and hoped it was a mistake.  This is ridiculous.  Two episodes now shown out of order.  And I don&#8217;t understand how they can show &#8220;Suburbs&#8221; and not go straight into the sweeps story arc, its going to be a mess showing &#8220;Best Friend&#8221; after that.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine how much they&#8217;re having to re-shoot or edit.  As it was it was obvious the ending of &#8220;3D&#8221; was re-shot.  Way to go NBC, ruining every bit of momentum gained from the Super Bowl promotion.</p>
<p>If Chuck can&#8217;t get traction after this mess it&#8217;ll be a frakking shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strahotski</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47829</link>
		<dc:creator>Strahotski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47829</guid>
		<description>There is presidential news conference this Monday at 8pm ET. Therefore, no new Chuck. NBC will air a rerun, &quot;Chuck vs. the Cougars&quot; on the west coast. 

Episode 2.13 &quot;Chuck vs. Best Friends&quot; was scheduled to air 2/9 but will be aired on 2/23. NBC will air episode 2.14 &quot;Chuck vs. the Suburbs&quot; on 2/16 because it is probably a Valentine&#039;s Day episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is presidential news conference this Monday at 8pm ET. Therefore, no new Chuck. NBC will air a rerun, &#8220;Chuck vs. the Cougars&#8221; on the west coast. </p>
<p>Episode 2.13 &#8220;Chuck vs. Best Friends&#8221; was scheduled to air 2/9 but will be aired on 2/23. NBC will air episode 2.14 &#8220;Chuck vs. the Suburbs&#8221; on 2/16 because it is probably a Valentine&#8217;s Day episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47810</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47810</guid>
		<description>the thing about the superbowl promotion is, people may have said &quot;hey that looks good, maybe I&#039;ll tune in!&quot; But then the next day they remember that Chuck is on teh same time as &quot;The Big Bang Theory&quot; or &quot;The Bachelor&quot; or &quot;House&quot; (whichever they watch) and of course don&#039;t tune in. Same goes for Heroes and Medium, people may have been interested, but not enough to skip out on a different show

It all comes down to the brutal competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing about the superbowl promotion is, people may have said &#8220;hey that looks good, maybe I&#8217;ll tune in!&#8221; But then the next day they remember that Chuck is on teh same time as &#8220;The Big Bang Theory&#8221; or &#8220;The Bachelor&#8221; or &#8220;House&#8221; (whichever they watch) and of course don&#8217;t tune in. Same goes for Heroes and Medium, people may have been interested, but not enough to skip out on a different show</p>
<p>It all comes down to the brutal competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47754</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47754</guid>
		<description>Looking at the ratings, Heroes is 2nd in 18 - 34 and 3rd in 18 - 49, means to me that old folks are watching Two and a Half Men.   From what I&#039;ve seen of it, that makes sense.

I watched Heroes.  Very exciting and fun.  I had to watch all the Sylar scenes again right away.  Sylar and HRG really make the show.  I&#039;m glad they are finally doing something with Nathan.  

I watched the first few episode of 24 but found it too predictable.  I never bought into the idea that one device could give terrorists access to every government facility. Maybe I&#039;ll  pick it up on Hulu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the ratings, Heroes is 2nd in 18 &#8211; 34 and 3rd in 18 &#8211; 49, means to me that old folks are watching Two and a Half Men.   From what I&#8217;ve seen of it, that makes sense.</p>
<p>I watched Heroes.  Very exciting and fun.  I had to watch all the Sylar scenes again right away.  Sylar and HRG really make the show.  I&#8217;m glad they are finally doing something with Nathan.  </p>
<p>I watched the first few episode of 24 but found it too predictable.  I never bought into the idea that one device could give terrorists access to every government facility. Maybe I&#8217;ll  pick it up on Hulu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bree</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47743</link>
		<dc:creator>Bree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47743</guid>
		<description>So, anyone get a confirmation from NBC whether or not there&#039;ll be Chuck next Monday (Feb. 9th)? Their site has been inconsistent. First it was &quot;Chuck versus the Best Friend&quot; for the 16th. Then the date got switch to Feb. 9th. Now, supposedly &quot;Chuck versus the Suburbs&quot; will be the next episode on Feb. 16th. What&#039;s up, Chuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, anyone get a confirmation from NBC whether or not there&#8217;ll be Chuck next Monday (Feb. 9th)? Their site has been inconsistent. First it was &#8220;Chuck versus the Best Friend&#8221; for the 16th. Then the date got switch to Feb. 9th. Now, supposedly &#8220;Chuck versus the Suburbs&#8221; will be the next episode on Feb. 16th. What&#8217;s up, Chuck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt2</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47740</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47740</guid>
		<description>Just some observations:

Paul, the lineup you created for NBC&#039;s fall 2009 looks really good.  I hope they take your advice.  I think it really maximizes the little they have to work with at the start of next fall, especially knowing that they&#039;ve basically given up on the 10pm hour. Of course some of those iffy shows on your roster may go into the trash bin before the end of this season.

There seems to be no end to the growth of ABC&#039;s, The Bachelor.  As the anticipation builds towards the finale, ABC must be salivating over the potential 14 to 15 million viewers (+/-) for the final rose ceremony/wedding proposal. The big question is who&#039;s more stunned by this; ABC or the rival networks. My  guess is that they already are planning either a Bachelor Women Tell All special or an After The Final Rose concluding show or both.  If they&#039;re really on top of things, they&#039;ve already secured the rights to air the actual wedding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just some observations:</p>
<p>Paul, the lineup you created for NBC&#8217;s fall 2009 looks really good.  I hope they take your advice.  I think it really maximizes the little they have to work with at the start of next fall, especially knowing that they&#8217;ve basically given up on the 10pm hour. Of course some of those iffy shows on your roster may go into the trash bin before the end of this season.</p>
<p>There seems to be no end to the growth of ABC&#8217;s, The Bachelor.  As the anticipation builds towards the finale, ABC must be salivating over the potential 14 to 15 million viewers (+/-) for the final rose ceremony/wedding proposal. The big question is who&#8217;s more stunned by this; ABC or the rival networks. My  guess is that they already are planning either a Bachelor Women Tell All special or an After The Final Rose concluding show or both.  If they&#8217;re really on top of things, they&#8217;ve already secured the rights to air the actual wedding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-8/#comment-47690</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47690</guid>
		<description>Re: the Chuck 3D hoopla. It may not have helped the NBC show that much, and it may have frustrated people, but it did bring our site its biggest traffic days ever attributable to Google search alone (as opposed to a direct link from a traffic firehose like drudgereport). ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the Chuck 3D hoopla. It may not have helped the NBC show that much, and it may have frustrated people, but it did bring our site its biggest traffic days ever attributable to Google search alone (as opposed to a direct link from a traffic firehose like drudgereport). <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47689</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47689</guid>
		<description>&quot;And while The Big Bang Theory isn’t in 3-D, it also isn’t funny either.&quot;



Spoken like a &quot;Chuck&quot; fan. How could they have made them easier? Better distribution would have been a start. Then maybe, I don&#039;t know, sending stores enough pairs so they don&#039;t run out. And possibly letting stores have them well before January 31, which was the date the stores I go put them out. Better yet, they could have just done the thing in red/green 3-D, since I imagine most people have a pair of _those_ lying around. Best of all, they could just let the show&#039;s merits -- or lack thereof -- stand on their own and not have to resort to gimmicks to sell the thing. Mostly the last part. 

But enough of that silly show. 

Now McG letting Christian Bale walk all over him, his DP and his set -- THAT&#039;S funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And while The Big Bang Theory isn’t in 3-D, it also isn’t funny either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spoken like a &#8220;Chuck&#8221; fan. How could they have made them easier? Better distribution would have been a start. Then maybe, I don&#8217;t know, sending stores enough pairs so they don&#8217;t run out. And possibly letting stores have them well before January 31, which was the date the stores I go put them out. Better yet, they could have just done the thing in red/green 3-D, since I imagine most people have a pair of _those_ lying around. Best of all, they could just let the show&#8217;s merits &#8212; or lack thereof &#8212; stand on their own and not have to resort to gimmicks to sell the thing. Mostly the last part. </p>
<p>But enough of that silly show. </p>
<p>Now McG letting Christian Bale walk all over him, his DP and his set &#8212; THAT&#8217;S funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47553</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47553</guid>
		<description>Alex, I did not say Heores was in danger of being cancelled at any point. I simply pointed out that this demo/total audience ratio you made up is significant of jack shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I did not say Heores was in danger of being cancelled at any point. I simply pointed out that this demo/total audience ratio you made up is significant of jack shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmokey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47519</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47519</guid>
		<description>Just me, or is that a 10% drop in viewers and demo for 24 from last week?  It&#039;s also a 15% drop in the demo since the high water mark of 4.4 received by the first half hour of the first Monday showing.

So we are not yet halfway through 24 and it&#039;s already halfway to the 30% drop off in the demo that I predicted after watching the two night premier.  Look for it to scrape down near the 3.0 area by the end of the season.  Last night was a new low for the show, by the way.  Dumbest ep of the year.

And, yeah, I know that it&#039;s sick that I hate it but am still watching it, but I liken it to my (also) sick need to check out the traffic accident as I drive on by.

Chuck is dead.  Long live Chuck.

Best rating ever for Chuck, but I have to believe that was not the number NBC was looking for when they devoted literally tens of millions of dollars in Super Bowl real estate to promoing Chuck.  I also have to think Ben Silverman may actually be the worst network exec in history.  His decision not to air Chuck after the Super Bowl in lieu of the Office was a gigantic brain fart.  I guess we will find out Thursday if it paid any dividends, but I would have thought Chuck could have benefitted far more from the slot than any other NBC show, and especially more than The Office.  If they were going to try and bump up a Thursday comedy, they should have gone with 30 Rock.

After dumping out on Heroes one hour into the season premier, I came back for the mid season premier of The Fugitives.  I was massively disappointed that Tommy Lee Jones was not in it, and I dumped out again after a half hour.  I expect ALL of that bump in viewers was due to people like me wanting to see if Heroes was any better yet.  It wasn&#039;t, so I expect an immeadiate return to its season long slide starting next week.

On a side note, when did Parkman become a pedophile?  Watching him with that girlfried of his was just creepy.  They also had zero chemistry, which I attribute mostly to her having to kiss a fat guy who is old enough to be her grandfather.

By the way, with all the hype around the Chuck episode, as a regular (but not devoted) watcher of the show I have to say that was the worst episode of Chuck I&#039;ve ever seen by a large margin.  If the show were that bad on a regular basis, I&#039;d not be watching it all.  It was boring.  The acting was atrocious.  The 3D was extremely 2D, while the show itself was almost 1D.  And anyone who did not have a pair of the glasses must have spent much of the show trying to adjust the color and contrast on their television set.  

Way to totally screw up a walk in the park, Mr. Silverman.  If you worked on Wall Street, you&#039;d likely get a nice bonus for your work so far.  As you work in television, can I validate that parking for your way out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just me, or is that a 10% drop in viewers and demo for 24 from last week?  It&#8217;s also a 15% drop in the demo since the high water mark of 4.4 received by the first half hour of the first Monday showing.</p>
<p>So we are not yet halfway through 24 and it&#8217;s already halfway to the 30% drop off in the demo that I predicted after watching the two night premier.  Look for it to scrape down near the 3.0 area by the end of the season.  Last night was a new low for the show, by the way.  Dumbest ep of the year.</p>
<p>And, yeah, I know that it&#8217;s sick that I hate it but am still watching it, but I liken it to my (also) sick need to check out the traffic accident as I drive on by.</p>
<p>Chuck is dead.  Long live Chuck.</p>
<p>Best rating ever for Chuck, but I have to believe that was not the number NBC was looking for when they devoted literally tens of millions of dollars in Super Bowl real estate to promoing Chuck.  I also have to think Ben Silverman may actually be the worst network exec in history.  His decision not to air Chuck after the Super Bowl in lieu of the Office was a gigantic brain fart.  I guess we will find out Thursday if it paid any dividends, but I would have thought Chuck could have benefitted far more from the slot than any other NBC show, and especially more than The Office.  If they were going to try and bump up a Thursday comedy, they should have gone with 30 Rock.</p>
<p>After dumping out on Heroes one hour into the season premier, I came back for the mid season premier of The Fugitives.  I was massively disappointed that Tommy Lee Jones was not in it, and I dumped out again after a half hour.  I expect ALL of that bump in viewers was due to people like me wanting to see if Heroes was any better yet.  It wasn&#8217;t, so I expect an immeadiate return to its season long slide starting next week.</p>
<p>On a side note, when did Parkman become a pedophile?  Watching him with that girlfried of his was just creepy.  They also had zero chemistry, which I attribute mostly to her having to kiss a fat guy who is old enough to be her grandfather.</p>
<p>By the way, with all the hype around the Chuck episode, as a regular (but not devoted) watcher of the show I have to say that was the worst episode of Chuck I&#8217;ve ever seen by a large margin.  If the show were that bad on a regular basis, I&#8217;d not be watching it all.  It was boring.  The acting was atrocious.  The 3D was extremely 2D, while the show itself was almost 1D.  And anyone who did not have a pair of the glasses must have spent much of the show trying to adjust the color and contrast on their television set.  </p>
<p>Way to totally screw up a walk in the park, Mr. Silverman.  If you worked on Wall Street, you&#8217;d likely get a nice bonus for your work so far.  As you work in television, can I validate that parking for your way out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47510</guid>
		<description>Riff, exactly how would you have made them easier to find? Would you prefer they mail a pair to everyone in America? People keep saying how they should&#039;ve made it easier, I don&#039;t know how they could have.

And while The Big Bang Theory isn&#039;t in 3-D, it also isn&#039;t funny either.

Moving on, i&#039;m indifferent about Chuck&#039;s numbers. They&#039;re sort of what I thought would happen, maybe a tad above my expectations. But as was said above, the real test is next week. If it goes back down to where it was, bad things are going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riff, exactly how would you have made them easier to find? Would you prefer they mail a pair to everyone in America? People keep saying how they should&#8217;ve made it easier, I don&#8217;t know how they could have.</p>
<p>And while The Big Bang Theory isn&#8217;t in 3-D, it also isn&#8217;t funny either.</p>
<p>Moving on, i&#8217;m indifferent about Chuck&#8217;s numbers. They&#8217;re sort of what I thought would happen, maybe a tad above my expectations. But as was said above, the real test is next week. If it goes back down to where it was, bad things are going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47500</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47500</guid>
		<description>I think NBC needs to take a look at their very successful cable stations and instead of having their big shows go with long breaks- program year round. Shows that air 10-12 episodes in the fall come back in the spring while other programming steps in in the winter and summer. Air half seasons with no breaks and no repeats and then you can have shows like Medium step into rotation with the net offering quality year round programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think NBC needs to take a look at their very successful cable stations and instead of having their big shows go with long breaks- program year round. Shows that air 10-12 episodes in the fall come back in the spring while other programming steps in in the winter and summer. Air half seasons with no breaks and no repeats and then you can have shows like Medium step into rotation with the net offering quality year round programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47480</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47480</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chuck&quot; isn&#039;t in any immediate danger since Silverman likes the show and NBC has worse problems, but NBC spent an awful lot to get precious little in return. Me? I spent several days looking for one of those confounded SoBe water displays, and when I finally found one, of course there were no pairs of glasses left in it. So I threw on a pair of red/green 3-D glasses I had lying around. 2 minutes into &quot;Chuck,&quot; I realized I needed yellow/blue 3-D glasses. I didn&#039;t have those. So I changed the channel. &quot;The Big Bang Theory&quot; wasn&#039;t in 3-D, but they had Leonard and the gang showing up at Penny&#039;s ex-boyfriend&#039;s apartment. He lived in Apt. -- wait for it -- 3-D. 

Seriously, if you&#039;re going to do a lame gimmick like this, is it too much to ask that you make the glasses a little easier to find? (And, no, I&#039;m not calling Pepsi and giving them my address so they can send me a pair... and I can only imagine what else.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chuck&#8221; isn&#8217;t in any immediate danger since Silverman likes the show and NBC has worse problems, but NBC spent an awful lot to get precious little in return. Me? I spent several days looking for one of those confounded SoBe water displays, and when I finally found one, of course there were no pairs of glasses left in it. So I threw on a pair of red/green 3-D glasses I had lying around. 2 minutes into &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; I realized I needed yellow/blue 3-D glasses. I didn&#8217;t have those. So I changed the channel. &#8220;The Big Bang Theory&#8221; wasn&#8217;t in 3-D, but they had Leonard and the gang showing up at Penny&#8217;s ex-boyfriend&#8217;s apartment. He lived in Apt. &#8212; wait for it &#8212; 3-D. </p>
<p>Seriously, if you&#8217;re going to do a lame gimmick like this, is it too much to ask that you make the glasses a little easier to find? (And, no, I&#8217;m not calling Pepsi and giving them my address so they can send me a pair&#8230; and I can only imagine what else.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47461</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47461</guid>
		<description>jason, actually it dropped below 3M months ago.  It has been steadily dropping since October.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jason, actually it dropped below 3M months ago.  It has been steadily dropping since October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANIL</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47449</link>
		<dc:creator>ANIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47449</guid>
		<description>Wow what the heck is up with gg&#039;s numbers? It dropped miserably. I myself have not been enjoying it as much as I did in its first season but this is sad.
I hope it does get a 3rd season. But as long as its not like getting 1 million thats ok enough for the cw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what the heck is up with gg&#8217;s numbers? It dropped miserably. I myself have not been enjoying it as much as I did in its first season but this is sad.<br />
I hope it does get a 3rd season. But as long as its not like getting 1 million thats ok enough for the cw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47438</guid>
		<description>&quot;HEROES isn’t in a good place. It’s too expensive. If renewed I see massive cutbacks and a shrinking cast.&quot;

Cutbacks would be nothing but a good thing for the show at this point the cast is far too big and impossible to write for and they have over Season 2 and the first half of Season 3 relied far too much on big effects shots to make episodes and stories impressive. Of course its also worth pointing out that I don’t think it’s a case of if it gets renewed at this point. NBC will cut the budget and bring it back for a fourth season before axing it unless the demos absolutely tank over the second half of season three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;HEROES isn’t in a good place. It’s too expensive. If renewed I see massive cutbacks and a shrinking cast.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cutbacks would be nothing but a good thing for the show at this point the cast is far too big and impossible to write for and they have over Season 2 and the first half of Season 3 relied far too much on big effects shots to make episodes and stories impressive. Of course its also worth pointing out that I don’t think it’s a case of if it gets renewed at this point. NBC will cut the budget and bring it back for a fourth season before axing it unless the demos absolutely tank over the second half of season three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47437</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47437</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re correct thedemonhog , that was the interview I saw. I confused the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re correct thedemonhog , that was the interview I saw. I confused the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47432</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47432</guid>
		<description>abc makes money from selling commercials on lost
abc makes money syndicating lost
abc makes money selling dvd&#039;s and blu-rays of lost
abc makes money selling the show to individual countries around the world

end result...  abc is making lots of money off of lost.  they know how much it costs to make. they apparently don&#039;t mind.  why?  because they are making money. and it won&#039;t stop.  once the show is over they can still sell dvd&#039;s, blu-rays...  and on whatever the next technology is...  as well as syndicate it in the future for future generations of tv fans.  

abc+lost=happy
shows like bachelor and dancing (nothing against them) but they are mostly useless after being aired...  though the dancing tour is probably making some bucks for them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abc makes money from selling commercials on lost<br />
abc makes money syndicating lost<br />
abc makes money selling dvd&#8217;s and blu-rays of lost<br />
abc makes money selling the show to individual countries around the world</p>
<p>end result&#8230;  abc is making lots of money off of lost.  they know how much it costs to make. they apparently don&#8217;t mind.  why?  because they are making money. and it won&#8217;t stop.  once the show is over they can still sell dvd&#8217;s, blu-rays&#8230;  and on whatever the next technology is&#8230;  as well as syndicate it in the future for future generations of tv fans.  </p>
<p>abc+lost=happy<br />
shows like bachelor and dancing (nothing against them) but they are mostly useless after being aired&#8230;  though the dancing tour is probably making some bucks for them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedemonhog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47427</link>
		<dc:creator>thedemonhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47427</guid>
		<description>Correction for cool: Each &#039;Lost&#039; episode costs $4 million per http://lostmediamentions.blogspot.com/2009/01/stephen-mcpherso-on-lost-4-million.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction for cool: Each &#8216;Lost&#8217; episode costs $4 million per <a href="http://lostmediamentions.blogspot.com/2009/01/stephen-mcpherso-on-lost-4-million.html" rel="nofollow">http://lostmediamentions.blogspot.com/2009/01/stephen-mcpherso-on-lost-4-million.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47424</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47424</guid>
		<description>To add: this is why ABC is airing this season of Scrubs. It&#039;s doing doing gangbusters for the network, but ABC Studios is making big bucks on each extra episode produced. All profits eventually go to Disney, no matter where they&#039;re made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add: this is why ABC is airing this season of Scrubs. It&#8217;s doing doing gangbusters for the network, but ABC Studios is making big bucks on each extra episode produced. All profits eventually go to Disney, no matter where they&#8217;re made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47423</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47423</guid>
		<description>ABC studios makes Lost. ABC airs Lost. It&#039;s winning all around for Disney Co.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC studios makes Lost. ABC airs Lost. It&#8217;s winning all around for Disney Co.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47414</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47414</guid>
		<description>CW&#039;s #2 show in 18-49? Smallville, Supernatural, America&#039;s Next Top Model, OTH and 90210 has better numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW&#8217;s #2 show in 18-49? Smallville, Supernatural, America&#8217;s Next Top Model, OTH and 90210 has better numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47411</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47411</guid>
		<description>Gossip Girl only started going below 3 million when House moved directly against it. And even with that, up through last week, it&#039;s the CW&#039;s #2 show in 18-49. It&#039;ll probably fall now, but still. It is not a failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gossip Girl only started going below 3 million when House moved directly against it. And even with that, up through last week, it&#8217;s the CW&#8217;s #2 show in 18-49. It&#8217;ll probably fall now, but still. It is not a failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47408</guid>
		<description>HEROES isn&#039;t in a good place.  It&#039;s too expensive.  If renewed I see massive cutbacks and a shrinking cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEROES isn&#8217;t in a good place.  It&#8217;s too expensive.  If renewed I see massive cutbacks and a shrinking cast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47407</guid>
		<description>As a Heroes fan, I&#039;ll take what I can get.  I know the ratings aren&#039;t that great, but to be honest most people probably feel like they can&#039;t get into it now even if they want to because it&#039;s halfway thru the 3rd season.  Last nite&#039;s episode was pretty damn good.  It was back to the awesomeness that was season one.  So while I doubt (altho I hope!) Heroes gets anymore, I don&#039;t see it really losing any.  I say the numbers stay about the same now if they keep up with episodes like last nights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Heroes fan, I&#8217;ll take what I can get.  I know the ratings aren&#8217;t that great, but to be honest most people probably feel like they can&#8217;t get into it now even if they want to because it&#8217;s halfway thru the 3rd season.  Last nite&#8217;s episode was pretty damn good.  It was back to the awesomeness that was season one.  So while I doubt (altho I hope!) Heroes gets anymore, I don&#8217;t see it really losing any.  I say the numbers stay about the same now if they keep up with episodes like last nights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47406</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47406</guid>
		<description>tom, that&#039;s pretty easy to do when seasons cost what $40?  That also mostly helps the production company or studio that made the show more than the one that aired it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom, that&#8217;s pretty easy to do when seasons cost what $40?  That also mostly helps the production company or studio that made the show more than the one that aired it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-7/#comment-47404</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47404</guid>
		<description>btw: lost also sold 40 million dollars worth in the U.S. alone and just on dvd...  for their last season.  that doesn&#039;t include blu-ray or any dvd or blu-ray sales overseas.

and lost is sold by abc to other markets.  they get a lot of money back based on that 3 million per episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw: lost also sold 40 million dollars worth in the U.S. alone and just on dvd&#8230;  for their last season.  that doesn&#8217;t include blu-ray or any dvd or blu-ray sales overseas.</p>
<p>and lost is sold by abc to other markets.  they get a lot of money back based on that 3 million per episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47402</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47402</guid>
		<description>Medium use to get 11mil ratings, before they moved it, and then put it back.

I hate it when channels move programs just to watch the ratings flop, and then put it back, expecting the ratings to return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medium use to get 11mil ratings, before they moved it, and then put it back.</p>
<p>I hate it when channels move programs just to watch the ratings flop, and then put it back, expecting the ratings to return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47401</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47401</guid>
		<description>Good for House !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for House !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47398</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47398</guid>
		<description>Every episode of Lost costs 3 millions, Stephen McPherson said that in January I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every episode of Lost costs 3 millions, Stephen McPherson said that in January I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47395</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47395</guid>
		<description>Jeff, &quot;Promotion doesn&#039;t propel NBC&quot; would&#039;ve been the better headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, &#8220;Promotion doesn&#8217;t propel NBC&#8221; would&#8217;ve been the better headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47393</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47393</guid>
		<description>Ike, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite that simple to say any show that exceeds a 3.0 in 18-49 is a hit, although its true from a rankings point of view. Last week, even with Super Bowl, Post Game, Post Game office and American Idol, only 20 airings had a 3.0 or better, including repeats of The Office and How I Met Your Mother (there was no new Grey&#039;s or Desperate Housewives last week)

The rankings unfortunately don&#039;t compare relative cost and the relative cost of Heroes is rumored to be higher than just about everything.  LOST probably ain&#039;t cheap either, but it got a 4.9 rating.   I believe Cool was referring to The Bachelor and not NCIS.  NBC talks a lot about managing margins, not ratings.  Margin-wise, at least currently and based on TV viewing, The Bachelor looks like the much better property.  But The Bachelor has no DVD or syndication value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite that simple to say any show that exceeds a 3.0 in 18-49 is a hit, although its true from a rankings point of view. Last week, even with Super Bowl, Post Game, Post Game office and American Idol, only 20 airings had a 3.0 or better, including repeats of The Office and How I Met Your Mother (there was no new Grey&#8217;s or Desperate Housewives last week)</p>
<p>The rankings unfortunately don&#8217;t compare relative cost and the relative cost of Heroes is rumored to be higher than just about everything.  LOST probably ain&#8217;t cheap either, but it got a 4.9 rating.   I believe Cool was referring to The Bachelor and not NCIS.  NBC talks a lot about managing margins, not ratings.  Margin-wise, at least currently and based on TV viewing, The Bachelor looks like the much better property.  But The Bachelor has no DVD or syndication value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47392</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47392</guid>
		<description>NBC has floated their PR that the Super Bowl would propel them into a new season of ratings. They stated the same type PR about the Olympics. What sports event is next on their agenda to propel them into yet another new season. 4th place after all that promotion is not a &quot;Propel&quot; moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC has floated their PR that the Super Bowl would propel them into a new season of ratings. They stated the same type PR about the Olympics. What sports event is next on their agenda to propel them into yet another new season. 4th place after all that promotion is not a &#8220;Propel&#8221; moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47391</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47391</guid>
		<description>you MUST all be HAPPY for 24 !! i mean come on it&#039;s in His 7th season !!!! 
just take a moment and think what HEREOS will do in his 7th Seaosn !! 
for me i think it will be Canceled in HIS 4th 
( sorry 4 my ENGLISH )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you MUST all be HAPPY for 24 !! i mean come on it&#8217;s in His 7th season !!!!<br />
just take a moment and think what HEREOS will do in his 7th Seaosn !!<br />
for me i think it will be Canceled in HIS 4th<br />
( sorry 4 my ENGLISH )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gojou</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47388</link>
		<dc:creator>Gojou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47388</guid>
		<description>NewsFlash:

CW should have a new pet project (not related to GG, Priv, 91210), or promote their best horses (Supernatural, Smallville, and ANTM).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NewsFlash:</p>
<p>CW should have a new pet project (not related to GG, Priv, 91210), or promote their best horses (Supernatural, Smallville, and ANTM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47387</guid>
		<description>At this point, any show that exceeds a 3.0 among adults 18-49 is a &quot;hit.&quot; A 4.0 is now pretty uncommon. The sinking networks will grip these shows like life jackets.

I have to agree with Alex: Advertisers are demo-crazy, so those excess age-50+ viewers for NCIS don&#039;t matter to the ad rates.

But I also strongly agree with him when he said, &quot;of course I also give [the Heroes writers] two weeks before they screw it up, again.&quot; Last night&#039;s Heroes was surprisingly compelling but I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll derail soon enough, at least until we eventually get to the episodes where Bryan Fuller rejoined the writing staff.

Cool said: &quot;...Heroes was beaten by a show with 14 seasons....&quot;
The ratings ascension of an old show like NCIS is highly unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, any show that exceeds a 3.0 among adults 18-49 is a &#8220;hit.&#8221; A 4.0 is now pretty uncommon. The sinking networks will grip these shows like life jackets.</p>
<p>I have to agree with Alex: Advertisers are demo-crazy, so those excess age-50+ viewers for NCIS don&#8217;t matter to the ad rates.</p>
<p>But I also strongly agree with him when he said, &#8220;of course I also give [the Heroes writers] two weeks before they screw it up, again.&#8221; Last night&#8217;s Heroes was surprisingly compelling but I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll derail soon enough, at least until we eventually get to the episodes where Bryan Fuller rejoined the writing staff.</p>
<p>Cool said: &#8220;&#8230;Heroes was beaten by a show with 14 seasons&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
The ratings ascension of an old show like NCIS is highly unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47384</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47384</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t check out all the posts here so not sure if someone already brought this up BUT...

if all the nbc promos didn&#039;t work for chuck and heroes etc...  then you think maybe all the sponsors who spent all that money for 30 seconds or one minute only... might come to the realization that it doesn&#039;t help them either?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t check out all the posts here so not sure if someone already brought this up BUT&#8230;</p>
<p>if all the nbc promos didn&#8217;t work for chuck and heroes etc&#8230;  then you think maybe all the sponsors who spent all that money for 30 seconds or one minute only&#8230; might come to the realization that it doesn&#8217;t help them either?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47379</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47379</guid>
		<description>The fact that Heroes was beaten by a show with 14 seasons it says too much. Unlike Lost, Heroes has only three seasons and the free fall is alarming. I expect normal numbers next week (3.5 demo)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Heroes was beaten by a show with 14 seasons it says too much. Unlike Lost, Heroes has only three seasons and the free fall is alarming. I expect normal numbers next week (3.5 demo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47378</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47378</guid>
		<description>Alex, at 4.0 Heroes is not in any danger. It was in danger when it was in a free fall and down to 3.5 and looked like it was just going to continue to fall. I don&#039;t see anyone saying in this post that Heroes is going to get canceled off of these numbers. But despite that, Heroes was still 3rd in its timeslot, so it&#039;s nothing to trumpet from the roofs either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, at 4.0 Heroes is not in any danger. It was in danger when it was in a free fall and down to 3.5 and looked like it was just going to continue to fall. I don&#8217;t see anyone saying in this post that Heroes is going to get canceled off of these numbers. But despite that, Heroes was still 3rd in its timeslot, so it&#8217;s nothing to trumpet from the roofs either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47376</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47376</guid>
		<description>&quot;Alex, a 4.0 is a 4.0 and Heroes is not getting some kind of premium for having only a third of the viewers of NCIS. It’s not a ‘have the least old people watching’ competition. Heroes like Lost will keep skating by on its decent demo numbers and that’s fine, but neither show gets extra cookies for having less total viewers than NCIS or House with comparable demos. In what world would that even make sense.&quot;

My point was that anyone trying to argue Heroes (or any other show) is on its last legs because its equalling the demo of a show that has more than twice as many viewers is using flawed and backward logic, particularly if you accept the notion that advertisers care about demo performance and not total audience numbers. If it takes NCIS nearly 20 million viewers to get a 4.0 in the 18-49 and Heroes less than 10 million total viewers to do the same then how is that bad news for Heroes? More over if you’re NBC and you look at Heroes demo/total audience ratio vs. pretty much every show not called House on Monday nights then you can create some positive spin/vibes on the show - in fact you can do that just be comparing it to the rest of the NBC line-up for the night.

All three NBC shows averaged around the same audience and yet Heroes was nearly an entire point ahead of Chuck in the 18-49 and was an entire point ahead of Medium. Meanwhile it was 2 points ahead of Medium 18-34 and a 1.5 ahead of Chuck.  Meanwhile if you compare it to 24 on Fox, which averaged nearly 3 million more viewers it was ahead by 0.2 in 18-49 and 1.1 in the 18-34. The Bachelor averaged 3 million more viewers but was only ahead in the demos by 0.4 and 0.3 respectively these aren’t huge margin and whilst Two and a Half Men gets nearly double the total viewers as Heroes its only 1.5 ahead in 18-49 and actually loses to Heroes in the 18-34. 

To try and argue that Heroes comparative strength in the demos vs. its comparative weakness in total audience doesn’t matter really doesn’t add up - it is important because it gives NBC reason to care about the show. If they can regain just a fraction of the old Heroes audience, say back to 10 million what happens to those demo numbers then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Alex, a 4.0 is a 4.0 and Heroes is not getting some kind of premium for having only a third of the viewers of NCIS. It’s not a ‘have the least old people watching’ competition. Heroes like Lost will keep skating by on its decent demo numbers and that’s fine, but neither show gets extra cookies for having less total viewers than NCIS or House with comparable demos. In what world would that even make sense.&#8221;</p>
<p>My point was that anyone trying to argue Heroes (or any other show) is on its last legs because its equalling the demo of a show that has more than twice as many viewers is using flawed and backward logic, particularly if you accept the notion that advertisers care about demo performance and not total audience numbers. If it takes NCIS nearly 20 million viewers to get a 4.0 in the 18-49 and Heroes less than 10 million total viewers to do the same then how is that bad news for Heroes? More over if you’re NBC and you look at Heroes demo/total audience ratio vs. pretty much every show not called House on Monday nights then you can create some positive spin/vibes on the show &#8211; in fact you can do that just be comparing it to the rest of the NBC line-up for the night.</p>
<p>All three NBC shows averaged around the same audience and yet Heroes was nearly an entire point ahead of Chuck in the 18-49 and was an entire point ahead of Medium. Meanwhile it was 2 points ahead of Medium 18-34 and a 1.5 ahead of Chuck.  Meanwhile if you compare it to 24 on Fox, which averaged nearly 3 million more viewers it was ahead by 0.2 in 18-49 and 1.1 in the 18-34. The Bachelor averaged 3 million more viewers but was only ahead in the demos by 0.4 and 0.3 respectively these aren’t huge margin and whilst Two and a Half Men gets nearly double the total viewers as Heroes its only 1.5 ahead in 18-49 and actually loses to Heroes in the 18-34. </p>
<p>To try and argue that Heroes comparative strength in the demos vs. its comparative weakness in total audience doesn’t matter really doesn’t add up &#8211; it is important because it gives NBC reason to care about the show. If they can regain just a fraction of the old Heroes audience, say back to 10 million what happens to those demo numbers then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47368</guid>
		<description>i say move heroes to sunday and go for a lois and clark type night, while i watch desperate housewives and heroes i dont think there is that much audience overlap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i say move heroes to sunday and go for a lois and clark type night, while i watch desperate housewives and heroes i dont think there is that much audience overlap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47366</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47366</guid>
		<description>or 

monday
8 pm medium
9 pm Law &amp; Order: SVU

friday
8 pm deal or no deal
9 pm the listener</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or </p>
<p>monday<br />
8 pm medium<br />
9 pm Law &amp; Order: SVU</p>
<p>friday<br />
8 pm deal or no deal<br />
9 pm the listener</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/03/monday-ratings-super-bowl-promotions-dont-help-nbcs-ratings-woes/12054/comment-page-6/#comment-47365</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=12054#comment-47365</guid>
		<description>Yes &quot;josie&quot;, because wednesday nights have less competition during half season...

Heroes and Chuck in Fall have the competition from ESPN football night...

and then American Idol on Wednesdays are only 30 minutes...

so i think this night is the best shot from this two shows.

then medium on fridays at 8 pm no because GW&#039;s...

Medium is a cop supernatural show that could perform well at 9 pm on mondays with a good lead-in: deal or no deal (??) or other better if they have any...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8220;josie&#8221;, because wednesday nights have less competition during half season&#8230;</p>
<p>Heroes and Chuck in Fall have the competition from ESPN football night&#8230;</p>
<p>and then American Idol on Wednesdays are only 30 minutes&#8230;</p>
<p>so i think this night is the best shot from this two shows.</p>
<p>then medium on fridays at 8 pm no because GW&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
<p>Medium is a cop supernatural show that could perform well at 9 pm on mondays with a good lead-in: deal or no deal (??) or other better if they have any&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

