Comments on: Grammy Awards Show Ratings http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:50:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Beyond the Box » Blog Archive » The Oscars should be as interesting as Oscars.com http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-52366 Beyond the Box » Blog Archive » The Oscars should be as interesting as Oscars.com Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:51:05 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-52366 [...] Some 19.05 million people tuned in to this year’s Grammy’s, even without Chris and Rihanna, compared to 2008’s 17.18 million. (Still, like all awards shows, the Grammys’ long-term ratings are down, according to this incredibly informative chart by tvbythenumbers.com.) [...] [...] Some 19.05 million people tuned in to this year’s Grammy’s, even without Chris and Rihanna, compared to 2008’s 17.18 million. (Still, like all awards shows, the Grammys’ long-term ratings are down, according to this incredibly informative chart by tvbythenumbers.com.) [...]

]]> By: Ratings: Grammy’s Gain Audience Over Last Year - TV Decoder Blog - NYTimes.com http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48754 Ratings: Grammy’s Gain Audience Over Last Year - TV Decoder Blog - NYTimes.com Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:12:54 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48754 [...] to 11 p.m., improving 2.5 million viewers over last year’s audience of 17.2 million viewers. (TV By The Numbers has graphed the Grammy’s ratings fluctuations over the [...] [...] to 11 p.m., improving 2.5 million viewers over last year’s audience of 17.2 million viewers. (TV By The Numbers has graphed the Grammy’s ratings fluctuations over the [...]

]]> By: John http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48688 John Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:11:11 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48688 Finally a decent Line up of acts, but because of poor sound mixing which has now become a TV broadcast standard, you were unable to hear most of the vocal perfomances. I quit watching and reviewed the recorded version looking for redeeming moments to no avail. Television no longer knows how to broadcast musical performances with the glaring exception of PBS. Finally a decent Line up of acts, but because of poor sound mixing which has now become a TV broadcast standard, you were unable to hear most of the vocal perfomances. I quit watching and reviewed the recorded version looking for redeeming moments to no avail. Television no longer knows how to broadcast musical performances with the glaring exception of PBS.

]]> By: Gojou http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48555 Gojou Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:02:18 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48555 Robert Seidman - Thank You. Robert Seidman – Thank You.

]]> By: Julia http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48480 Julia Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:57:10 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48480 ABCFanatic, Britney has lost her trainwreck status. I don't think even she could pull big ratings today. ABCFanatic, Britney has lost her trainwreck status. I don’t think even she could pull big ratings today.

]]> By: jeff http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48479 jeff Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:51:30 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48479 It's because they nominate garbage. Kanye? Utter shite. It’s because they nominate garbage. Kanye? Utter shite.

]]> By: Hot Pocket http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48104 Hot Pocket Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:17:37 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48104 Yep the record of 8 awards won that year. Oddly enough he was with Brooke Shields at that time and Emmanuel Lewis. Odd ass hell! Music doesn't have any real stand outs right now to increase ratings like Michael did or Eminem did recently back in '01. Yep the record of 8 awards won that year. Oddly enough he was with Brooke Shields at that time and Emmanuel Lewis. Odd ass hell!

Music doesn’t have any real stand outs right now to increase ratings like Michael did or Eminem did recently back in ’01.

]]> By: ABCFanatic2009 http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48076 ABCFanatic2009 Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:45:44 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48076 Put Britney Spears and the ratings will get high! Put Britney Spears and the ratings will get high!

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48054 Robert Seidman Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:55:14 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48054 Gojou, it was Michael Jackson's heyday. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammy_Awards_of_1984 Gojou, it was Michael Jackson’s heyday.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammy_Awards_of_1984

]]> By: Gojou http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48053 Gojou Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:45:25 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48053 I am one of those dumb people who know very little about Grammy history. What was so special about 84...? I am one of those dumb people who know very little about Grammy history. What was so special about 84…?

]]> By: DaisiesDeathKnell http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-48021 DaisiesDeathKnell Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:24:48 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-48021 '02 and '06 were both the years U2 was nominated for a ton of awards....although "Beautiful Day" and "Vertigo" both netted plenty of Grammys in the years beforehand....interesting that both of those years were the recent weaklings considering that U2 is the world's most popular rock band at the moment. :/ ’02 and ’06 were both the years U2 was nominated for a ton of awards….although “Beautiful Day” and “Vertigo” both netted plenty of Grammys in the years beforehand….interesting that both of those years were the recent weaklings considering that U2 is the world’s most popular rock band at the moment. :/

]]> By: Bill Gorman http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-47982 Bill Gorman Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:09:43 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-47982 juno, for 2/8/06, your memory was a bit off, Olympics started on Friday that week, and my data shows no Dancing W/ Stars on Wednesday. <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="500"><!--StartFragment--> <col width="143"></col> <col width="28"></col> <col width="55"></col> <col width="46"></col> <col width="56"></col> <tbody></tbody> <tbody></tbody> <tbody> <tr height="16"> <td width="143" height="16">Show</td> <td width="28">Net</td> <td width="55">Viewers</td> <td width="46">Start</td> <td width="56">minutes</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY</td> <td class="xl24">FOX</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>28,741</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">8:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">62</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">LOST</td> <td class="xl24">ABC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>18,737</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">9:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">62</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">GRAMMY AWARDS(S)</td> <td class="xl24">CBS</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>17,005</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">8:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">213</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">LAW AND ORDER</td> <td class="xl24">NBC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>14,528</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">10:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">60</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">BONES</td> <td class="xl24">FOX</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>11,905</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">9:02 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">58</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">INVASION</td> <td class="xl24">ABC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>9,092</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">10:02 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">58</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">GEORGE LOPEZ</td> <td class="xl24">ABC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>6,399</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">8:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">30</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">FREDDIE</td> <td class="xl24">ABC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>5,959</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">8:30 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">30</td> </tr> <tr height="16"> <td class="xl24" height="16">BIGGEST LOSER:SPECL EDITN</td> <td class="xl24">NBC</td> <td class="xl26" align="right"><span> </span>5,896</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">8:00 PM</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">120</td> </tr> </tbody></table> juno, for 2/8/06, your memory was a bit off, Olympics started on Friday that week, and my data shows no Dancing W/ Stars on Wednesday.


Show Net Viewers Start minutes
AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY FOX 28,741 8:00 PM 62
LOST ABC 18,737 9:00 PM 62
GRAMMY AWARDS(S) CBS 17,005 8:00 PM 213
LAW AND ORDER NBC 14,528 10:00 PM 60
BONES FOX 11,905 9:02 PM 58
INVASION ABC 9,092 10:02 PM 58
GEORGE LOPEZ ABC 6,399 8:00 PM 30
FREDDIE ABC 5,959 8:30 PM 30
BIGGEST LOSER:SPECL EDITN NBC 5,896 8:00 PM 120
]]> By: juno http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-47977 juno Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:55:28 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-47977 Bill, do you have the ratings for what those programs I listed all got in 2006 on that night against the Grammys? I would appreciate it very much, thank you! Bill, do you have the ratings for what those programs I listed all got in 2006 on that night against the Grammys?
I would appreciate it very much, thank you!

]]> By: juno http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-47974 juno Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:46:51 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-47974 2006 was the worst year ever because CBS decided to air them on a Wednesday while their competition aired: NBC: Winter Olympics ABC: Dancing With The Stars FOX: American Idol & obviously CBS and the Grammys bombed. 2006 was the worst year ever because CBS decided to air them on a Wednesday while their competition aired:

NBC: Winter Olympics
ABC: Dancing With The Stars
FOX: American Idol

& obviously CBS and the Grammys bombed.

]]> By: dave http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223/comment-page-1/#comment-47892 dave Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:32:50 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/05/grammy-awards-show-ratings/12223#comment-47892 American Idol will outdraw the grammys which I find odd. Anyways, the grammys seem to award what's popular as oppose to what's good. American Idol will outdraw the grammys which I find odd.

Anyways, the grammys seem to award what’s popular as oppose to what’s good.

]]>