<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Ratings: Without a Trace rerun surprises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 07/03/09 - Sábado &#171; Seriados News TV!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57638</link>
		<dc:creator>07/03/09 - Sábado &#171; Seriados News TV!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57638</guid>
		<description>[...] Fonte [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57383</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57383</guid>
		<description>It was nice too see a Grissom double episode rerun since he left the show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was nice too see a Grissom double episode rerun since he left the show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57258</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57258</guid>
		<description>The problem, as far as I can tell, isn’t the concept (since that’s exactly the same) but that Americans will apparently struggle with the differences between British law and US law and I say that because as far as I can tell that’s the only difference between the two shows, except the casts. 

I suspect that Law &amp; Order: UK will end up on USA (at best) rather than NBC unless NBC wants to fill a hole over the summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem, as far as I can tell, isn’t the concept (since that’s exactly the same) but that Americans will apparently struggle with the differences between British law and US law and I say that because as far as I can tell that’s the only difference between the two shows, except the casts. </p>
<p>I suspect that Law &amp; Order: UK will end up on USA (at best) rather than NBC unless NBC wants to fill a hole over the summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57255</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57255</guid>
		<description>julia, i did read the post :P I think L&amp;O:UK is good, but iv never seen the US version! It cant be that hard for Americans to grasp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>julia, i did read the post <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  I think L&amp;O:UK is good, but iv never seen the US version! It cant be that hard for Americans to grasp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57077</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57077</guid>
		<description>I live in the Uk and Law and Order UK isn&#039;t very good, it&#039;s predictable. I have watched the first 2 episodes and the 3rd airs tonight, I don&#039;t think it would be an easy show for an American audience to grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the Uk and Law and Order UK isn&#8217;t very good, it&#8217;s predictable. I have watched the first 2 episodes and the 3rd airs tonight, I don&#8217;t think it would be an easy show for an American audience to grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57073</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57073</guid>
		<description>Josh, Dick Wolf feels the same way. It&#039;s almost as if you actually read the quoted bits of the article in the post you commented on just before this! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, Dick Wolf feels the same way. It&#8217;s almost as if you actually read the quoted bits of the article in the post you commented on just before this! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57071</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57071</guid>
		<description>hmmm maybe NBC should consider showing L&amp;O UK on saturdays of CBS can get ratings like that on a Saturday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm maybe NBC should consider showing L&amp;O UK on saturdays of CBS can get ratings like that on a Saturday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57040</guid>
		<description>Jon&#039;s right, CBS ran the CSI/WAT crossover.  My dad&#039;s DVR recorded both since he likes watching the shows even in reruns.  Yeah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon&#8217;s right, CBS ran the CSI/WAT crossover.  My dad&#8217;s DVR recorded both since he likes watching the shows even in reruns.  Yeah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedemonhog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57028</link>
		<dc:creator>thedemonhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57028</guid>
		<description>Fantastic viewership for CBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic viewership for CBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57014</guid>
		<description>They also had a 48-hours &quot;mini-mystery&quot; during the commercial breaks of the 2 shows as well, so that could have added to the boost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also had a 48-hours &#8220;mini-mystery&#8221; during the commercial breaks of the 2 shows as well, so that could have added to the boost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-57010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-57010</guid>
		<description>Regarding Without A Trace, it looks like CBS aired a rerun of the 2-part CSI/WAT crossover from last season. That might account for the higher than normal ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Without A Trace, it looks like CBS aired a rerun of the 2-part CSI/WAT crossover from last season. That might account for the higher than normal ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-56995</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-56995</guid>
		<description>More importantly, Jared, the Cops repeat got better numbers. Everything on FOX did better than both TSCC and Dollhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly, Jared, the Cops repeat got better numbers. Everything on FOX did better than both TSCC and Dollhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-56993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-56993</guid>
		<description>that law and order rerun got better numbers than the latest TSCC episode on friday..... I&#039;m just saying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that law and order rerun got better numbers than the latest TSCC episode on friday&#8230;.. I&#8217;m just saying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-56982</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-56982</guid>
		<description>yes, the label should&#039;ve been (and now is,thanks!) 10:30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, the label should&#8217;ve been (and now is,thanks!) 10:30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-56979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-56979</guid>
		<description>Assuming that last section should be labelled 10:30, all three networks saw increases from 10:00 to 10:30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming that last section should be labelled 10:30, all three networks saw increases from 10:00 to 10:30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/08/saturday-ratings-without-a-trace-rerun-surprises/14163/comment-page-1/#comment-56968</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14163#comment-56968</guid>
		<description>cbs and fox actually had decent numbers.  ouch for the 2 hr repeats of apprentice and b&amp;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cbs and fox actually had decent numbers.  ouch for the 2 hr repeats of apprentice and b&amp;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

