<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Ratings: Dancing with the Stars returns bigger than before</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-59278</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-59278</guid>
		<description>Ugh, I hate Dancing with the stars!  Heroes is getting it&#039;s game back so why is everyone abandoning it?

I REALLY REALLY hope this next Brian Fuller written Episode (Cold Snap) saves my favourite show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, I hate Dancing with the stars!  Heroes is getting it&#8217;s game back so why is everyone abandoning it?</p>
<p>I REALLY REALLY hope this next Brian Fuller written Episode (Cold Snap) saves my favourite show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castle, un encantador y atractivo &#8220;Jessica Fletcher&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-59062</link>
		<dc:creator>Castle, un encantador y atractivo &#8220;Jessica Fletcher&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-59062</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía &#124; TV by the Numbers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía | TV by the Numbers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58782</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58782</guid>
		<description>ABC should just give up on creating new shows. Most of em&#039; get cancelled anyway. I say they should cancel castle now and just get it over with...it&#039;ll save the show&#039;s fans (including me) a lot of pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC should just give up on creating new shows. Most of em&#8217; get cancelled anyway. I say they should cancel castle now and just get it over with&#8230;it&#8217;ll save the show&#8217;s fans (including me) a lot of pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChucK Vs The Ratings</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58275</link>
		<dc:creator>ChucK Vs The Ratings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58275</guid>
		<description>The Chuckster is in trouble.  I feel like I am watching a reapeat of the &quot;Arrested Development&quot; scenario..

I am just going to enjoy the ride..

NBC marketing department should be fired.  NBC, since the super bowl has been a train wreck in markting there shows..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chuckster is in trouble.  I feel like I am watching a reapeat of the &#8220;Arrested Development&#8221; scenario..</p>
<p>I am just going to enjoy the ride..</p>
<p>NBC marketing department should be fired.  NBC, since the super bowl has been a train wreck in markting there shows..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58245</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58245</guid>
		<description>Nick?  I&#039;m not sure what you mean exactly.  If they back the 2 minutes out and report only 10:02-11:00p (which they did) it seemed to account for three-tenths of an 18-49 point.  So some people did bail immediately after DWTS was over, but that can hardly be a surprise.   But judging from the half hour numbers from the overnight, what you say is still true -- some people definitely stuck around for a while before bailing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick?  I&#8217;m not sure what you mean exactly.  If they back the 2 minutes out and report only 10:02-11:00p (which they did) it seemed to account for three-tenths of an 18-49 point.  So some people did bail immediately after DWTS was over, but that can hardly be a surprise.   But judging from the half hour numbers from the overnight, what you say is still true &#8212; some people definitely stuck around for a while before bailing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58242</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58242</guid>
		<description>Ok, 2 minutes can&#039;t affect a 30 minute rating.  People tuned in for longer than 6 minutes of that 30 minutes, and then changed the channel.  Which isn&#039;t a bad thing, it was a new show.  They didn&#039;t know if they&#039;d like it.  They decided it wasn&#039;t for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, 2 minutes can&#8217;t affect a 30 minute rating.  People tuned in for longer than 6 minutes of that 30 minutes, and then changed the channel.  Which isn&#8217;t a bad thing, it was a new show.  They didn&#8217;t know if they&#8217;d like it.  They decided it wasn&#8217;t for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58237</link>
		<dc:creator>ljo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58237</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Julia. And, Matt, if you&#039;re really interested in the ratings try Bill/Roberts Numbers 102:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/numbers-102

There is also a link in that posting to Numbers 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Julia. And, Matt, if you&#8217;re really interested in the ratings try Bill/Roberts Numbers 102:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/numbers-102" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/numbers-102</a></p>
<p>There is also a link in that posting to Numbers 101.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58231</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58231</guid>
		<description>ljo, the final demo rating for Castle was 3.0, so if the 2.9 held, there was a slight drop off but not much of one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ljo, the final demo rating for Castle was 3.0, so if the 2.9 held, there was a slight drop off but not much of one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58228</link>
		<dc:creator>ljo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58228</guid>
		<description>Matt, the most important indicator of how attractive a show is to advertisers is its performance in the 18-49 (year olds) demo. While Castle&#039;s 3.3/9 isn&#039;t bad per se, it&#039;s often the case that shows will have a drop off in performance from the series premiere. In addition, as Robert points out in the post, the second half hour (2.9/8) was significantly lower than the first half hour (3.7/9) and this drop off was probably due to 2 minutes of Dancing With the Stars being included in the first half hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, the most important indicator of how attractive a show is to advertisers is its performance in the 18-49 (year olds) demo. While Castle&#8217;s 3.3/9 isn&#8217;t bad per se, it&#8217;s often the case that shows will have a drop off in performance from the series premiere. In addition, as Robert points out in the post, the second half hour (2.9/8) was significantly lower than the first half hour (3.7/9) and this drop off was probably due to 2 minutes of Dancing With the Stars being included in the first half hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58204</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58204</guid>
		<description>so i&#039;m new to these ratings and how you constitute what is bad and good... so Castle premiering with 11 million is bad right?  but if a show averages 11 million after a while that is good? Because that&#039;s about what Brothers and Sisters does and it&#039;s considered a hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so i&#8217;m new to these ratings and how you constitute what is bad and good&#8230; so Castle premiering with 11 million is bad right?  but if a show averages 11 million after a while that is good? Because that&#8217;s about what Brothers and Sisters does and it&#8217;s considered a hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58146</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58146</guid>
		<description>Could someone please explain to me why it always shows Two and a Half Men beating 24? That seems a little bit ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone please explain to me why it always shows Two and a Half Men beating 24? That seems a little bit ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-17/#comment-58131</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58131</guid>
		<description>idizzle, it&#039;s just what I hear.  IF it gets renewed they expect it to rebound and trend back up.  Then over the summer there will be repeats and DVD sales, internet viewing, etc.  They hope it gains some viewers.  Then they throw it on behind BONES in the fall without AI.  The hope being that the quality remains good compared to the stuff airing currently, and with a strong lead in like BONES they introduce more people to the show.

Then again they were talking about BONES on Fridays for a long time, so maybe they&#039;re thinking of BONES on Friday again.  They talk about it every year.  Yes, I do hear the want to combine the show with BONES or FRINGE for the Fall if the show returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idizzle, it&#8217;s just what I hear.  IF it gets renewed they expect it to rebound and trend back up.  Then over the summer there will be repeats and DVD sales, internet viewing, etc.  They hope it gains some viewers.  Then they throw it on behind BONES in the fall without AI.  The hope being that the quality remains good compared to the stuff airing currently, and with a strong lead in like BONES they introduce more people to the show.</p>
<p>Then again they were talking about BONES on Fridays for a long time, so maybe they&#8217;re thinking of BONES on Friday again.  They talk about it every year.  Yes, I do hear the want to combine the show with BONES or FRINGE for the Fall if the show returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 09/03/09 - Segunda-feira &#171; Seriados News TV!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-58065</link>
		<dc:creator>09/03/09 - Segunda-feira &#171; Seriados News TV!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58065</guid>
		<description>[...] Fonte [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-58053</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58053</guid>
		<description>I’m a Chuck fan, and I also watch Heroes which I think is OK.   But I also don’t understand the hatred for Heroes that Chuck fans have.  If Chuck gets cancelled it won’t be because of Heroes, it will be a combination of the poor ratings, crazy competition and Jay Leno hogging 1/3 of the schedule.  
In my dream world, this would happen.  NBC would renew Chuck for 13 episodes and put in on Wednesday, after a few weeks if the ratings are still horrible they let the creators know the will not be renewing the show, giving them time to write an awesome series finale.   But that will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a Chuck fan, and I also watch Heroes which I think is OK.   But I also don’t understand the hatred for Heroes that Chuck fans have.  If Chuck gets cancelled it won’t be because of Heroes, it will be a combination of the poor ratings, crazy competition and Jay Leno hogging 1/3 of the schedule.<br />
In my dream world, this would happen.  NBC would renew Chuck for 13 episodes and put in on Wednesday, after a few weeks if the ratings are still horrible they let the creators know the will not be renewing the show, giving them time to write an awesome series finale.   But that will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-58024</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58024</guid>
		<description>For Schmokey, who seems to schmoking something potent...24s DVR numbers are normally in the 2ms. They had that

So yeah it is 13.09 so far the average</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Schmokey, who seems to schmoking something potent&#8230;24s DVR numbers are normally in the 2ms. They had that</p>
<p>So yeah it is 13.09 so far the average</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-58016</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58016</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why ABC continues to make new shows, they all get cancelled anyways. They may as well just cancel castle now, save all of us (including me) the trouble of getting attached to the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why ABC continues to make new shows, they all get cancelled anyways. They may as well just cancel castle now, save all of us (including me) the trouble of getting attached to the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fra</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-58009</link>
		<dc:creator>fra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-58009</guid>
		<description>The promo of heroes 3x20 is great
It &#039;ll be a epic episode watch this photo!
http://mrtheodi.iimmgg.com/image/9278c86154b80dd537ad0ddb365bbb9b
Bryan fuller directed it ..... 
PEOPLE WATCH HEROES !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The promo of heroes 3&#215;20 is great<br />
It &#8216;ll be a epic episode watch this photo!<br />
<a href="http://mrtheodi.iimmgg.com/image/9278c86154b80dd537ad0ddb365bbb9b" rel="nofollow">http://mrtheodi.iimmgg.com/image/9278c86154b80dd537ad0ddb365bbb9b</a><br />
Bryan fuller directed it &#8230;..<br />
PEOPLE WATCH HEROES !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCfanaticLove</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57993</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCfanaticLove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57993</guid>
		<description>I hope Castle sticks with 11 million

NBC is so sad! 5 and 6 million with their scripted shows looks bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Castle sticks with 11 million</p>
<p>NBC is so sad! 5 and 6 million with their scripted shows looks bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seraphim</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57975</link>
		<dc:creator>Seraphim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57975</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s an insane ammount of posts in such a short time. I just hope NBC&#039;s available choices are that low that they will still renew Chuck + even though I think all this &quot;move it to this and that night&quot; talk is not really helpful, I consider the competition on Mondays to be kinda fierce right now. If a show however changes the day it is brodcasted on on a weekly basis just to see how it works it will loose even more viewers due to confusion. However though NBC execs don&#039;t seem to be that popular here even they have to realize that Monday is not the best day to have a show on. While for us all this is more about entertainment it is their friggin job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s an insane ammount of posts in such a short time. I just hope NBC&#8217;s available choices are that low that they will still renew Chuck + even though I think all this &#8220;move it to this and that night&#8221; talk is not really helpful, I consider the competition on Mondays to be kinda fierce right now. If a show however changes the day it is brodcasted on on a weekly basis just to see how it works it will loose even more viewers due to confusion. However though NBC execs don&#8217;t seem to be that popular here even they have to realize that Monday is not the best day to have a show on. While for us all this is more about entertainment it is their friggin job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesus_stick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57972</link>
		<dc:creator>jesus_stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57972</guid>
		<description>heroes is like a dog hit by a car. its still limping, but its in massive pain... JUST ENDS ITS SUFFERING... SHOOT IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heroes is like a dog hit by a car. its still limping, but its in massive pain&#8230; JUST ENDS ITS SUFFERING&#8230; SHOOT IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57958</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57958</guid>
		<description>I think ABC will very patient with Castle, the reviews has been good and it&#039;s a procedural.. unlike serials, they have far more stable audience. Also, I bet they are gonna be repeating the Pilot this Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ABC will very patient with Castle, the reviews has been good and it&#8217;s a procedural.. unlike serials, they have far more stable audience. Also, I bet they are gonna be repeating the Pilot this Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jocor</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57945</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57945</guid>
		<description>Why does Schmokey keep watching 24?

He/she seems to be an expert on the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Schmokey keep watching 24?</p>
<p>He/she seems to be an expert on the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayne</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57941</link>
		<dc:creator>jayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57941</guid>
		<description>Chuck will survive!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck will survive!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57934</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57934</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how anyone can watch DWTS.  It is seriously the stupidest show I&#039;ve ever seen.  I can&#039;t believe that Chuck dropped so far. I bet the DVR ratings will do good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how anyone can watch DWTS.  It is seriously the stupidest show I&#8217;ve ever seen.  I can&#8217;t believe that Chuck dropped so far. I bet the DVR ratings will do good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stryker</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57905</link>
		<dc:creator>Stryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57905</guid>
		<description>Well, Chuck went up a tad in the broadcast finals:

Chuck
- 5.796 million viewers
- 3.5/5 HH
- 2.1/6 A18-49</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Chuck went up a tad in the broadcast finals:</p>
<p>Chuck<br />
- 5.796 million viewers<br />
- 3.5/5 HH<br />
- 2.1/6 A18-49</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57882</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57882</guid>
		<description>alex, i never said i was a fan of the show or not.  i simply think that leno taking a third of nbc&#039;s holes in one fell swoop gives NBC the opportunity to reorganize there shows in such a way that they can aggressively go after fridays instead of it being a dumping ground for defunct shows and throwaway reality fare.  are we all so quick to forget that Life was scheduled on fridays at the beginning of the season?  and it was NOT because nbc didnt believe in the show.  in fact, when lipstick jungle faltered out of the gate, life was comissioned to take over its much better wednesday slot.  my point is that as recently as september 08, nbc was still trying to be competitive on fridays, but with their terrible slate last fall they again had to turn it into a dumping ground and try to shore up wednesday instead.  with leno, they have another shot this fall, and although some may think im crazy, i think they will go for it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alex, i never said i was a fan of the show or not.  i simply think that leno taking a third of nbc&#8217;s holes in one fell swoop gives NBC the opportunity to reorganize there shows in such a way that they can aggressively go after fridays instead of it being a dumping ground for defunct shows and throwaway reality fare.  are we all so quick to forget that Life was scheduled on fridays at the beginning of the season?  and it was NOT because nbc didnt believe in the show.  in fact, when lipstick jungle faltered out of the gate, life was comissioned to take over its much better wednesday slot.  my point is that as recently as september 08, nbc was still trying to be competitive on fridays, but with their terrible slate last fall they again had to turn it into a dumping ground and try to shore up wednesday instead.  with leno, they have another shot this fall, and although some may think im crazy, i think they will go for it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57881</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57881</guid>
		<description>Alex good point we dont want to send it wasteland.Wednsday sounds like a good spot for chuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex good point we dont want to send it wasteland.Wednsday sounds like a good spot for chuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57880</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57880</guid>
		<description>Where does this Chuck on Friday thing come from anyway? And why would any fan of the show want to see NBC move Chuck to Friday anyway? Lipstick Jungle (amongst countless others) says hello... and then goodbye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does this Chuck on Friday thing come from anyway? And why would any fan of the show want to see NBC move Chuck to Friday anyway? Lipstick Jungle (amongst countless others) says hello&#8230; and then goodbye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57879</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57879</guid>
		<description>And my 24 prediction is this - it makes it to Day 9 at least.

Its past the point where the numbers are going to drop off now, if anything it might start building some momentum heading into the finale so Day 7 is going to be a success all things considered. With that in mind I think even if the numbers slide for Day 8, Fox cuts the producers some slack and lets them try and turn things around for Day 9 thinking that the retool worked once it might work again. I would however say that Day 10 looks like the perfect moment to wrap the show if they can make it that far and &#039;the final day&#039; tag going into it would probably provide a jump in the numbers.

Of course I also think they need to think about introducing a new lead or at least not make Jack the centre of every season. I like Rene Walker and wouldn&#039;t mind seeing them trying to build things around her a little more next year with Jack in more of a supporting role but obviously that&#039;s never going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And my 24 prediction is this &#8211; it makes it to Day 9 at least.</p>
<p>Its past the point where the numbers are going to drop off now, if anything it might start building some momentum heading into the finale so Day 7 is going to be a success all things considered. With that in mind I think even if the numbers slide for Day 8, Fox cuts the producers some slack and lets them try and turn things around for Day 9 thinking that the retool worked once it might work again. I would however say that Day 10 looks like the perfect moment to wrap the show if they can make it that far and &#8216;the final day&#8217; tag going into it would probably provide a jump in the numbers.</p>
<p>Of course I also think they need to think about introducing a new lead or at least not make Jack the centre of every season. I like Rene Walker and wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing them trying to build things around her a little more next year with Jack in more of a supporting role but obviously that&#8217;s never going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57878</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57878</guid>
		<description>ted, life will most certainly be cancelled, but (contrary to bill and robert) i see chuck moving to friday before a move to wednesday.  although at this point its way too early to tell what is gonna happen with nbc other than 4 sitcomes on thursdays, 2hr biggest loser on tuesdays, and football on sundays in the fall... and of course a whole lotta Leno!  everything else is up in the air as to where it lands on the schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ted, life will most certainly be cancelled, but (contrary to bill and robert) i see chuck moving to friday before a move to wednesday.  although at this point its way too early to tell what is gonna happen with nbc other than 4 sitcomes on thursdays, 2hr biggest loser on tuesdays, and football on sundays in the fall&#8230; and of course a whole lotta Leno!  everything else is up in the air as to where it lands on the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57874</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57874</guid>
		<description>I still think NBC should have moved Chuck midseason and paired it with Life on Wednesday nights in place of Knight Rider and just fed Knight Rider to the wolves on Monday’s. I know Chuck would then have been going against Idol but frankly I think Chuck and Life are a better fit together than Chuck and Heroes ever were and its just in general a more interesting Wednesday block. 

On top of that I really don’t think the quality of Heroes lead-in was or is having any effect on its numbers so you don’t particularly lose anything by sticking Knight Rider there to die. Plus in theory you get an action block Monday with Knight Rider and Heroes although having not watched anything other than the Knight Rider TV movie (which was horrible) that might not actually work out in practice. 

Unfortunately that unwatched Chuck/Life block wasn’t to be and the unwatched Knight Rider/Life block was instead… It sucks to be NBC right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think NBC should have moved Chuck midseason and paired it with Life on Wednesday nights in place of Knight Rider and just fed Knight Rider to the wolves on Monday’s. I know Chuck would then have been going against Idol but frankly I think Chuck and Life are a better fit together than Chuck and Heroes ever were and its just in general a more interesting Wednesday block. </p>
<p>On top of that I really don’t think the quality of Heroes lead-in was or is having any effect on its numbers so you don’t particularly lose anything by sticking Knight Rider there to die. Plus in theory you get an action block Monday with Knight Rider and Heroes although having not watched anything other than the Knight Rider TV movie (which was horrible) that might not actually work out in practice. </p>
<p>Unfortunately that unwatched Chuck/Life block wasn’t to be and the unwatched Knight Rider/Life block was instead… It sucks to be NBC right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porky</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-16/#comment-57870</link>
		<dc:creator>porky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57870</guid>
		<description>Day 8 is already confirmed for next year.

As long as 24 is making money, it&#039;s going to be wanted by FOX. They don&#039;t care how, just give them the money. That&#039;s what it&#039;s all about. Like someone said it makes money internationally and truthfully it&#039;s one of the most recognizable shows in the history of FOX. Who would replace Jack Bauer on Monday?

Chances are a new show isn&#039;t going to do better. Maybe Fringe and then get a new show to follow AI on Tuesday&#039;s, but that&#039;s at least two years away. 

11 million isn&#039;t bad by today&#039;s standards. Non reality shows just don&#039;t get that many viewers or should I say non reality shows that aren&#039;t on CBS don&#039;t get that many viewers. 

24 will likely end when the writers and producers say so or when Keifer Sutherland says enough is enough. That could be Day 8, but my point is over the top plot and all, FOX will stay loyal to Jack Bauer as long as the fanbase keep watching which so far it has throughout Day 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Day 8 is already confirmed for next year.</p>
<p>As long as 24 is making money, it&#8217;s going to be wanted by FOX. They don&#8217;t care how, just give them the money. That&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about. Like someone said it makes money internationally and truthfully it&#8217;s one of the most recognizable shows in the history of FOX. Who would replace Jack Bauer on Monday?</p>
<p>Chances are a new show isn&#8217;t going to do better. Maybe Fringe and then get a new show to follow AI on Tuesday&#8217;s, but that&#8217;s at least two years away. </p>
<p>11 million isn&#8217;t bad by today&#8217;s standards. Non reality shows just don&#8217;t get that many viewers or should I say non reality shows that aren&#8217;t on CBS don&#8217;t get that many viewers. </p>
<p>24 will likely end when the writers and producers say so or when Keifer Sutherland says enough is enough. That could be Day 8, but my point is over the top plot and all, FOX will stay loyal to Jack Bauer as long as the fanbase keep watching which so far it has throughout Day 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57869</guid>
		<description>If Life is canceled then Chuck could take over it&#039;s slot on Wednesdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Life is canceled then Chuck could take over it&#8217;s slot on Wednesdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57861</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57861</guid>
		<description>ted, the biggest loser will almost certainly stay 2hrs come fall.  in addition, i think all the chuck fans need to take a deep breath here.  first of all it bumped up a tick to 2.1 in finals, and second, what else is nbc gonna launch here with better numbers?  monday night is extremely competitive and chuck still scores higher than half of nbc&#039;s programming.  monday at 8 the four nets had a combined demo of 15.9!  at 9pm that bumped up to only a 17.9.  needless to say monday at 8 (considering hut levels) is extremely tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ted, the biggest loser will almost certainly stay 2hrs come fall.  in addition, i think all the chuck fans need to take a deep breath here.  first of all it bumped up a tick to 2.1 in finals, and second, what else is nbc gonna launch here with better numbers?  monday night is extremely competitive and chuck still scores higher than half of nbc&#8217;s programming.  monday at 8 the four nets had a combined demo of 15.9!  at 9pm that bumped up to only a 17.9.  needless to say monday at 8 (considering hut levels) is extremely tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57857</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57857</guid>
		<description>Jane and Hudson i respect both of ya as fans of your shows and Hudson i say Heros and chuck is actually one of the shows i think critics love to watch.Even tho sometimes it seem they dont watch it exactly.But from the boards i have been on and watching nbc other shows it seems like chuck doesnt get the promotion it deserves.I say that in anger at nbc not any of you heros fans.If i were nbc i would move heros and chuck to a new night.Also Jesse please dont start anything i had enough arguments on here for one day.If you want to dance on a shows grave terminators is a prime canidate.Sorry terminator fans didnt mean to throw ya underneath this steam roller.But honestly some of you need to chill out and let both sides just sit and wait which is the case for us chuck fans which im willing to do.Sorry for the long talk in this reply but i thought i try and put a band aid on this war wound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane and Hudson i respect both of ya as fans of your shows and Hudson i say Heros and chuck is actually one of the shows i think critics love to watch.Even tho sometimes it seem they dont watch it exactly.But from the boards i have been on and watching nbc other shows it seems like chuck doesnt get the promotion it deserves.I say that in anger at nbc not any of you heros fans.If i were nbc i would move heros and chuck to a new night.Also Jesse please dont start anything i had enough arguments on here for one day.If you want to dance on a shows grave terminators is a prime canidate.Sorry terminator fans didnt mean to throw ya underneath this steam roller.But honestly some of you need to chill out and let both sides just sit and wait which is the case for us chuck fans which im willing to do.Sorry for the long talk in this reply but i thought i try and put a band aid on this war wound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57854</guid>
		<description>IF NBC has any sense they&#039;ll move Chuck to either Tuesday or Wednesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF NBC has any sense they&#8217;ll move Chuck to either Tuesday or Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hudson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57851</link>
		<dc:creator>Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57851</guid>
		<description>Jack: You are one of the people that give Chuck fans a bad name.

As a fan of both Heroes and Chuck, they are both written really well. I stopped watching Chuck after the Christmas finale, but that doesn&#039;t mean I think it&#039;s a bad show.

And critics lately have not been slagging it, on the contrary they have been having a lot of positive things to say about it (i.e. the improvement from the last volume). Now, I don&#039;t know any critic that pumps up Chuck, in fact, it&#039;s basically unknown, but that&#039;s not Chuck&#039;s fault, It&#039;s NBC&#039;s fault for its horrid promotion. It&#039;s basically the fans that pump it up themselves (while beating on Heroes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack: You are one of the people that give Chuck fans a bad name.</p>
<p>As a fan of both Heroes and Chuck, they are both written really well. I stopped watching Chuck after the Christmas finale, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I think it&#8217;s a bad show.</p>
<p>And critics lately have not been slagging it, on the contrary they have been having a lot of positive things to say about it (i.e. the improvement from the last volume). Now, I don&#8217;t know any critic that pumps up Chuck, in fact, it&#8217;s basically unknown, but that&#8217;s not Chuck&#8217;s fault, It&#8217;s NBC&#8217;s fault for its horrid promotion. It&#8217;s basically the fans that pump it up themselves (while beating on Heroes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57847</guid>
		<description>Oh look at that, Chuck died. Damn. It&#039;s been fun.

(I&#039;ll believe that The CW agreed to pick it up when I see it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh look at that, Chuck died. Damn. It&#8217;s been fun.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ll believe that The CW agreed to pick it up when I see it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57845</guid>
		<description>Well Travis, the next Heroes episode isn&#039;t for two weeks now, but from the promo it looks amazing. Plus it&#039;s written by Bryan Fuller, so there&#039;s a good chance it&#039;s going to totally rock.

Jack, how can you say Heroes isn&#039;t good any more if you&#039;ve stopped watching? It&#039;s hard to form an opinion on something you haven&#039;t seen. Villains did get convoluted and bad at times, but Fugitives has been a complete change and a lot of people who had problems with Villains have said that they&#039;re getting back into it. The episodes they&#039;ve been showing lately have been just as good as S1 IMO.

As for the critics, I think it&#039;s the fact that it&#039;s become a given to bash Heroes and no one wants to be the first to say they enjoy it again. Also, there are some out there who&#039;ve been saying its getting better.

And &quot;enjoy our victory&quot;? Yet again, you make it sound like Heroes and Chuck are in competition with each other. I think Chuck is a good match for Heroes and hope that it&#039;ll do well, to give NBC a reason to renew it so it can stay with Heroes on Mondays. Why don&#039;t you focus on your own show instead of bringing another one down (especially one you haven&#039;t been watching)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Travis, the next Heroes episode isn&#8217;t for two weeks now, but from the promo it looks amazing. Plus it&#8217;s written by Bryan Fuller, so there&#8217;s a good chance it&#8217;s going to totally rock.</p>
<p>Jack, how can you say Heroes isn&#8217;t good any more if you&#8217;ve stopped watching? It&#8217;s hard to form an opinion on something you haven&#8217;t seen. Villains did get convoluted and bad at times, but Fugitives has been a complete change and a lot of people who had problems with Villains have said that they&#8217;re getting back into it. The episodes they&#8217;ve been showing lately have been just as good as S1 IMO.</p>
<p>As for the critics, I think it&#8217;s the fact that it&#8217;s become a given to bash Heroes and no one wants to be the first to say they enjoy it again. Also, there are some out there who&#8217;ve been saying its getting better.</p>
<p>And &#8220;enjoy our victory&#8221;? Yet again, you make it sound like Heroes and Chuck are in competition with each other. I think Chuck is a good match for Heroes and hope that it&#8217;ll do well, to give NBC a reason to renew it so it can stay with Heroes on Mondays. Why don&#8217;t you focus on your own show instead of bringing another one down (especially one you haven&#8217;t been watching)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dutchie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57838</link>
		<dc:creator>dutchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57838</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe that 3 of the 4 shows I watch air at the same timeslot (House, Chuck, BBT) I hate that they have to compete, I want all of them to be winners. Dancing with the stars sucks :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe that 3 of the 4 shows I watch air at the same timeslot (House, Chuck, BBT) I hate that they have to compete, I want all of them to be winners. Dancing with the stars sucks <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57830</guid>
		<description>I watched Heroes for 2+ seasons and I wanted to continue watching it, but the show is not very good any more. I know Heroes fans are going to defend their show and that is good. But the reason Chuck fans slag it is because every critic in the business slags on it and pumps up Chuck. Just because Heroes gets better ratings, doesn&#039;t mean it is good. In fact, it isn&#039;t good anymore. Chuck, on the other hand, seems to get better and better. But enjoy the &#039;victory&#039; for now. You have more people with bad taste watching your show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Heroes for 2+ seasons and I wanted to continue watching it, but the show is not very good any more. I know Heroes fans are going to defend their show and that is good. But the reason Chuck fans slag it is because every critic in the business slags on it and pumps up Chuck. Just because Heroes gets better ratings, doesn&#8217;t mean it is good. In fact, it isn&#8217;t good anymore. Chuck, on the other hand, seems to get better and better. But enjoy the &#8216;victory&#8217; for now. You have more people with bad taste watching your show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57814</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57814</guid>
		<description>Ok, I bite, I&#039;ll do the Dollhouse debate even on Tuesdays:

Nick C, OTOH you state the ace up Dollhouse&#039;s sleeve is that it does the best Friday numbers for a scripted show on FOX in C3 in quite a while (whoa, holy qualifiers batman) and that FOX will hold on to it, because the really want to make Fridays work, OTOH now you say FOX wants to move it off of Fridays and pair it with Bones. With &lt;2.0 demo and &lt;4 million viewers? It&#039;s not that I am doubting you, but I am damn well doubting this. Which is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I bite, I&#8217;ll do the Dollhouse debate even on Tuesdays:</p>
<p>Nick C, OTOH you state the ace up Dollhouse&#8217;s sleeve is that it does the best Friday numbers for a scripted show on FOX in C3 in quite a while (whoa, holy qualifiers batman) and that FOX will hold on to it, because the really want to make Fridays work, OTOH now you say FOX wants to move it off of Fridays and pair it with Bones. With &lt;2.0 demo and &lt;4 million viewers? It&#8217;s not that I am doubting you, but I am damn well doubting this. Which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57801</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57801</guid>
		<description>Schmokey, it is actually cheaper to producer 24 than people think. This is according to Kiefer, or Queefer as you so eloquently put it,.

And yes..24 is a massive international juggernaught. It makes money. A LOT

If it didnt they would of ended it by now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schmokey, it is actually cheaper to producer 24 than people think. This is according to Kiefer, or Queefer as you so eloquently put it,.</p>
<p>And yes..24 is a massive international juggernaught. It makes money. A LOT</p>
<p>If it didnt they would of ended it by now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57795</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57795</guid>
		<description>Trust me i had a few of the shows i liked canned.So were on networks that didnt exactly knew what they had and others didnt let it grow a fan base.Im defenly on the good side and Fin i agree some of us are defenly taking some stuff out on heros.Which i try not on here.Because im a good guy and dont wish ill will on anyones favorite show.Trust me if this was the 90s or 80s we wouldnt have dancing and idol to contend with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me i had a few of the shows i liked canned.So were on networks that didnt exactly knew what they had and others didnt let it grow a fan base.Im defenly on the good side and Fin i agree some of us are defenly taking some stuff out on heros.Which i try not on here.Because im a good guy and dont wish ill will on anyones favorite show.Trust me if this was the 90s or 80s we wouldnt have dancing and idol to contend with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Watchers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Links, 03.10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57794</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Watchers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Links, 03.10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57794</guid>
		<description>[...] Ratings report from a jam-packed Monday night: &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221; delivered its highest premiere night rating of all time [22.5 million viewers, 5.9/15 in the 18-49], which also helped &#8220;Castle&#8221; debut with a very sizable figure [11.6 million, 3.3/9]. FOX&#8217;s strong Monday night duo of &#8220;House&#8221; [12.13 million , 4.8/13] and &#8220;24&#8243; [11.35 million, 3.6/9] was good yet again, even with &#8220;House&#8221; dropping to a season-low. NBC received more bad news, as both &#8220;Chuck&#8221; and &#8220;Heroes&#8221; fell again. [TV By The Numbers] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ratings report from a jam-packed Monday night: &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221; delivered its highest premiere night rating of all time [22.5 million viewers, 5.9/15 in the 18-49], which also helped &#8220;Castle&#8221; debut with a very sizable figure [11.6 million, 3.3/9]. FOX&#8217;s strong Monday night duo of &#8220;House&#8221; [12.13 million , 4.8/13] and &#8220;24&#8243; [11.35 million, 3.6/9] was good yet again, even with &#8220;House&#8221; dropping to a season-low. NBC received more bad news, as both &#8220;Chuck&#8221; and &#8220;Heroes&#8221; fell again. [TV By The Numbers] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57793</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57793</guid>
		<description>But thats still unfair: but still i&#039;m just saying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But thats still unfair: but still i&#8217;m just saying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57792</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57792</guid>
		<description>By the way for all those Chuck fans slashing Heroes I think its unfair seeing as Heroes just has better demos and is better a gaining sales than Chuck (internationally and in ads). Chuck yes is suffering hard competition but so is Heroes: why don&#039;t you slash The Office or 30 Rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way for all those Chuck fans slashing Heroes I think its unfair seeing as Heroes just has better demos and is better a gaining sales than Chuck (internationally and in ads). Chuck yes is suffering hard competition but so is Heroes: why don&#8217;t you slash The Office or 30 Rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57791</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57791</guid>
		<description>Yourwelcome.ALso for being so nice i will check out an episode of heros just to see what its like.I think alot of people are stressed about the show and we all know what stress does drive some people looney.I appciate the nice words Jane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yourwelcome.ALso for being so nice i will check out an episode of heros just to see what its like.I think alot of people are stressed about the show and we all know what stress does drive some people looney.I appciate the nice words Jane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57790</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57790</guid>
		<description>Though I suppose it&#039;s only natural that the &quot;omgz heroes sux chuck rulez!&quot; comments get more attention, I just want to point out that I think there is a larger number of more reasonable Chuck fans, myself included. While I&#039;ll admit that my first thought at reading the news of what is essentially Heroes&#039; renewal was what it might mean for Chuck, I also have plenty of friends who watch Heroes and was happy for them that it got renewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I suppose it&#8217;s only natural that the &#8220;omgz heroes sux chuck rulez!&#8221; comments get more attention, I just want to point out that I think there is a larger number of more reasonable Chuck fans, myself included. While I&#8217;ll admit that my first thought at reading the news of what is essentially Heroes&#8217; renewal was what it might mean for Chuck, I also have plenty of friends who watch Heroes and was happy for them that it got renewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-stars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206/comment-page-15/#comment-57789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14206#comment-57789</guid>
		<description>Thank you for being a sane Chuck fan, Travis, instead of a venom-spitting crazy one like some on this site. I&#039;ll never wish cancellation on anyone because I&#039;ve had far too many of my shows canned and I know the pain. At this point I&#039;m wishing Chuck would get renewed so people can stop taking it out on Heroes. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for being a sane Chuck fan, Travis, instead of a venom-spitting crazy one like some on this site. I&#8217;ll never wish cancellation on anyone because I&#8217;ve had far too many of my shows canned and I know the pain. At this point I&#8217;m wishing Chuck would get renewed so people can stop taking it out on Heroes. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

