<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Rated TV Shows Of All Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-4/#comment-71244</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-71244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed so many Beverly Hillbillies are here (though many of us LOVED it at some point) and the Bob Hope specials. Go Gunsmoke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed so many Beverly Hillbillies are here (though many of us LOVED it at some point) and the Bob Hope specials. Go Gunsmoke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yogurt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-64829</link>
		<dc:creator>yogurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-64829</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get your panties in a wad about there not being many shows on the list from the past decade.   There only used to be a few channels total back in the day so if your TV was on, it was on one of the few channels available.  It doesn&#039;t mean the shows were better back then, it just means they had no real choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get your panties in a wad about there not being many shows on the list from the past decade.   There only used to be a few channels total back in the day so if your TV was on, it was on one of the few channels available.  It doesn&#8217;t mean the shows were better back then, it just means they had no real choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-63119</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-63119</guid>
		<description>Wow, you have to go to #39 to get a show from the last decade, and there isn&#039;t a single non-Superbowl show from the last decade on the entire list.

Quite interesting to see that almost everything on this list is from the 1970&#039;s to the early 1990&#039;s. This list is strong evidence of the fracturing of the TV audience in recent years. 

There really is no &quot;big event&quot; television anymore in this era of internet, youtube, hulu.com, DVR, etc. The era of entire families and neighbourhoods sitting down to watch a non-sporting event TV show, like the Dallas season premiere is over!

(PS: I thought the Survivor finale from 2000 would have made the list)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you have to go to #39 to get a show from the last decade, and there isn&#8217;t a single non-Superbowl show from the last decade on the entire list.</p>
<p>Quite interesting to see that almost everything on this list is from the 1970&#8242;s to the early 1990&#8242;s. This list is strong evidence of the fracturing of the TV audience in recent years. </p>
<p>There really is no &#8220;big event&#8221; television anymore in this era of internet, youtube, hulu.com, DVR, etc. The era of entire families and neighbourhoods sitting down to watch a non-sporting event TV show, like the Dallas season premiere is over!</p>
<p>(PS: I thought the Survivor finale from 2000 would have made the list)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-63004</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-63004</guid>
		<description>This list really hammers the point home (at least for me) that the way the tv business will survive is with live programming, whether it is sports (superbowl!!) or American idol live content.  Programs that are live and have people actively interested.  If you think about it, the superbowl is amazing programming.  Not only do millions tune in for the game, but they tune in for the commercials.  You never hear anyone say, let&#039;s watch the season finale of Dollhouse and see what commercials are on.  It&#039;s amazing.  

The way the superbowl pulls people in is the way internet content and tv advertising is probably going.  The advertising has to be almost &quot;permission marketing&quot; in that people don&#039;t find it invasive and it needs to be delivered in such a way that it is part of the whole experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list really hammers the point home (at least for me) that the way the tv business will survive is with live programming, whether it is sports (superbowl!!) or American idol live content.  Programs that are live and have people actively interested.  If you think about it, the superbowl is amazing programming.  Not only do millions tune in for the game, but they tune in for the commercials.  You never hear anyone say, let&#8217;s watch the season finale of Dollhouse and see what commercials are on.  It&#8217;s amazing.  </p>
<p>The way the superbowl pulls people in is the way internet content and tv advertising is probably going.  The advertising has to be almost &#8220;permission marketing&#8221; in that people don&#8217;t find it invasive and it needs to be delivered in such a way that it is part of the whole experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smallville944</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62781</link>
		<dc:creator>Smallville944</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62781</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the top 100 viewership of all-time is that would be cool to see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the top 100 viewership of all-time is that would be cool to see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul PT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62729</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul PT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62729</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a rank based on total viewers... i think this categorie is more accurate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a rank based on total viewers&#8230; i think this categorie is more accurate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62653</link>
		<dc:creator>josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62653</guid>
		<description>Hey....where&#039;s Chuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230;.where&#8217;s Chuck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62617</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62617</guid>
		<description>OK, I love Chuck as much as the next person, but geez, enough with the fanboy stuff!  This list is Top 100 TV shows of ALL TIME.  Chuck is 4th in its time slot.  NBC should tell us it&#039;s back and move it to Wednesdays or just cancel it, but they shouldn&#039;t jerk us around like they are.

Anyway, good list Bill.  (I also like that Super Bowl XX---Da Bears!---was one of the highest-rated, even though it was a blowout.)  It certainly reflects the times that even though there are shows that garner more viewers these days, the ratings are about the percentage of homes watching the show.  That&#039;s why more recent Super Bowls are further down the list, even though they may have had more pure numbers; there are so many other choices for people, and so many more households have both multiple TVs and satellite/cable.

That was a good suggestion to come up with lists from the respective decades.  (For those lists, feel free to filter out sporting events.)  It would be interesting to see what was highly rated and what wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I love Chuck as much as the next person, but geez, enough with the fanboy stuff!  This list is Top 100 TV shows of ALL TIME.  Chuck is 4th in its time slot.  NBC should tell us it&#8217;s back and move it to Wednesdays or just cancel it, but they shouldn&#8217;t jerk us around like they are.</p>
<p>Anyway, good list Bill.  (I also like that Super Bowl XX&#8212;Da Bears!&#8212;was one of the highest-rated, even though it was a blowout.)  It certainly reflects the times that even though there are shows that garner more viewers these days, the ratings are about the percentage of homes watching the show.  That&#8217;s why more recent Super Bowls are further down the list, even though they may have had more pure numbers; there are so many other choices for people, and so many more households have both multiple TVs and satellite/cable.</p>
<p>That was a good suggestion to come up with lists from the respective decades.  (For those lists, feel free to filter out sporting events.)  It would be interesting to see what was highly rated and what wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanatic</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62605</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62605</guid>
		<description>EH!!!! you should have put the recent ratings (90s to now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EH!!!! you should have put the recent ratings (90s to now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62520</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s Chuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Chuck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doghouse Reilly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62457</link>
		<dc:creator>Doghouse Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62457</guid>
		<description>Given the growth in the total number of households with television, although only a few programs from the past two decades are on the list (not having counted I would estimate perhaps twenty), all of them have actually been seen in more households. For example, the series finale of Friends in May of 2004 drew a 29.8 rating and a 43 share. Nothing on the first list has below a 40.0 rating; there are actually 102 programs on the list, suggesting that Nielsen just picked out everything above a 40.0 rating.

However, that 29.8 rating in 2004 means Friends was seen in 32.3 million households. Looking at the second list, it was seen in more households than all the programs below Roots Pt. III (31.9 million households).

Some other totally pointless numbers:

*Michael Jackson Interview on ABC, 1993: 39.3/56 or 36.5 million households
*Highest rated episode of ER: Season Four finale, May 14th, 1998, 28.8/45 or 28.21 million households
*Highest rated episode of Survivor: Season One finale, August 23rd, 2000, 28.6/45 or 28.7 million households
*Final episode of The Cosby Show: 28.0/45
*Second half of the Joe Millionaire first season finale: February 17th, 2003, 21.8/29 or 23.244 million households
*Final episode of Home Improvement: 21.6/34
*Final episode of Family Ties: 21.0/35
*Highest rated episode of American Idol: Season Five finale, May 24th, 2006, 20.5/32 or 22.564 million households
*Highest rated episode of American Dreams: 9.2/15
*Highest rated episode of Jericho: 7.6/12
*Highest rated episode of Chuck: 5.6/9

Oh, television. So many numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the growth in the total number of households with television, although only a few programs from the past two decades are on the list (not having counted I would estimate perhaps twenty), all of them have actually been seen in more households. For example, the series finale of Friends in May of 2004 drew a 29.8 rating and a 43 share. Nothing on the first list has below a 40.0 rating; there are actually 102 programs on the list, suggesting that Nielsen just picked out everything above a 40.0 rating.</p>
<p>However, that 29.8 rating in 2004 means Friends was seen in 32.3 million households. Looking at the second list, it was seen in more households than all the programs below Roots Pt. III (31.9 million households).</p>
<p>Some other totally pointless numbers:</p>
<p>*Michael Jackson Interview on ABC, 1993: 39.3/56 or 36.5 million households<br />
*Highest rated episode of ER: Season Four finale, May 14th, 1998, 28.8/45 or 28.21 million households<br />
*Highest rated episode of Survivor: Season One finale, August 23rd, 2000, 28.6/45 or 28.7 million households<br />
*Final episode of The Cosby Show: 28.0/45<br />
*Second half of the Joe Millionaire first season finale: February 17th, 2003, 21.8/29 or 23.244 million households<br />
*Final episode of Home Improvement: 21.6/34<br />
*Final episode of Family Ties: 21.0/35<br />
*Highest rated episode of American Idol: Season Five finale, May 24th, 2006, 20.5/32 or 22.564 million households<br />
*Highest rated episode of American Dreams: 9.2/15<br />
*Highest rated episode of Jericho: 7.6/12<br />
*Highest rated episode of Chuck: 5.6/9</p>
<p>Oh, television. So many numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62407</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62407</guid>
		<description>Julia, amazing that you&#039;ve never seen the Seinfeld finale.  I was among the disappointed crowd - but I guess it did what it needed to do, in typical Seinfeld fashion.  What I did appreciate was the retrospect that ran before the finale. Clips, a few bloopers, and a wonderful montage playing to Green Day&#039;s &quot;Good Riddance (Time of your Life).&quot; The actual finale episode was the disappointing part IMHO.

If you look at the billions of Seinfeld repeat episodes on TBS and in syndication, you could probably DVR it. It&#039;s on so much, every day, that the finale is bound to show up sooner or later! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, amazing that you&#8217;ve never seen the Seinfeld finale.  I was among the disappointed crowd &#8211; but I guess it did what it needed to do, in typical Seinfeld fashion.  What I did appreciate was the retrospect that ran before the finale. Clips, a few bloopers, and a wonderful montage playing to Green Day&#8217;s &#8220;Good Riddance (Time of your Life).&#8221; The actual finale episode was the disappointing part IMHO.</p>
<p>If you look at the billions of Seinfeld repeat episodes on TBS and in syndication, you could probably DVR it. It&#8217;s on so much, every day, that the finale is bound to show up sooner or later! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62403</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62403</guid>
		<description>Matt and others requesting different lists, As I wrote earlier in the comments, we don&#039;t make the lists, Nielsen makes the lists. I&#039;d love to have lots of different lists too, but this is what we&#039;ve got from Nielsen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt and others requesting different lists, As I wrote earlier in the comments, we don&#8217;t make the lists, Nielsen makes the lists. I&#8217;d love to have lots of different lists too, but this is what we&#8217;ve got from Nielsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Z.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62395</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62395</guid>
		<description>It will be very interesting to see what kind of ratings the finale of ER gets. NBC is doubling the advertising price and I assume we&#039;ll see at least a doubling of ratings. I hope for NBC&#039;s sake, it does tremendously well. But, frankly, if the show had ended 5 years ago, while the show still had a good buzz, I think it would be huge, almost Seinfeld-like. But, now, not even George Clooney coming back could bump ratings up too much.

That being said, the two most interesting things on this list are the 13 showings of the Beverly Hillbillies, and the World Series game 6 from 1980, where my Philadelphia Phillies won their first World Series title. I wonder why, if they got such great ratings from a Kansas City/Philadelphia WS in 1980, why did the Tampa Bay/Philadelphia series this past season do so poorly? Plus, as talked about before, the Beverly Hillbillies must have been super popular to make it on this list a total of 13 times. If a show is popular, normally a finale shows up, but to have 13 shows of a series show up is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be very interesting to see what kind of ratings the finale of ER gets. NBC is doubling the advertising price and I assume we&#8217;ll see at least a doubling of ratings. I hope for NBC&#8217;s sake, it does tremendously well. But, frankly, if the show had ended 5 years ago, while the show still had a good buzz, I think it would be huge, almost Seinfeld-like. But, now, not even George Clooney coming back could bump ratings up too much.</p>
<p>That being said, the two most interesting things on this list are the 13 showings of the Beverly Hillbillies, and the World Series game 6 from 1980, where my Philadelphia Phillies won their first World Series title. I wonder why, if they got such great ratings from a Kansas City/Philadelphia WS in 1980, why did the Tampa Bay/Philadelphia series this past season do so poorly? Plus, as talked about before, the Beverly Hillbillies must have been super popular to make it on this list a total of 13 times. If a show is popular, normally a finale shows up, but to have 13 shows of a series show up is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62392</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62392</guid>
		<description>This is a lot like when people talk about movie box office take adjusted for inflation. You can&#039;t compare the eras like that. Pre-1990s, there were three channels with active programming. In the 50s, there was maybe one program a night that the country watched. Same goes for movies. Theaters didn&#039;t show 10 to 20 movies, they showed one or two. So, all those old-time numbers are based on a lack of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a lot like when people talk about movie box office take adjusted for inflation. You can&#8217;t compare the eras like that. Pre-1990s, there were three channels with active programming. In the 50s, there was maybe one program a night that the country watched. Same goes for movies. Theaters didn&#8217;t show 10 to 20 movies, they showed one or two. So, all those old-time numbers are based on a lack of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62390</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62390</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Laugh-In come after All In The Family? Because I remember watching &quot;Family&quot; with MY family (and believe me, that was embarrassing because my father talked like Archie Bunker at the table and then Archie comes on an hour later and says the same thing, and I look at my father and go, &quot;Where did I hear that?&quot; - and he tells me to shut up...) whereas I believe I watched Laugh-In by myself later.

Nope, just looked it up - I&#039;m wrong. But partly that&#039;s because Family ran for nine years and overlapped Laugh-In that started earlier. And I never watched Family after I left home in 1972 whereas I did watch Laugh-in. 

But Family definitely spurred a new direction in sit-coms all by itself.

And don&#039;t forget the spy shows! Man From U.N.C.L.E., Girl From U.N.C.L.E., Wild Wild West (a Western spy show and a damn good one, too!), The Avengers, I Spy, Mission Impossible, etc. Those were my favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Laugh-In come after All In The Family? Because I remember watching &#8220;Family&#8221; with MY family (and believe me, that was embarrassing because my father talked like Archie Bunker at the table and then Archie comes on an hour later and says the same thing, and I look at my father and go, &#8220;Where did I hear that?&#8221; &#8211; and he tells me to shut up&#8230;) whereas I believe I watched Laugh-In by myself later.</p>
<p>Nope, just looked it up &#8211; I&#8217;m wrong. But partly that&#8217;s because Family ran for nine years and overlapped Laugh-In that started earlier. And I never watched Family after I left home in 1972 whereas I did watch Laugh-in. </p>
<p>But Family definitely spurred a new direction in sit-coms all by itself.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget the spy shows! Man From U.N.C.L.E., Girl From U.N.C.L.E., Wild Wild West (a Western spy show and a damn good one, too!), The Avengers, I Spy, Mission Impossible, etc. Those were my favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62387</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62387</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree! Beverly Hillbillies was a huge hit, even by those Big 3-only standards. It spawned, directly or indirectly, Petticoat Junction and Green Acres. And it, along with the Andy Griffith shows (including Gomer Pyle) and Gunsmoke and Wild, Wild West, gave CBS a &quot;rural&quot; reputation that it intentionally repudiated in the 1970s beginning with Mary Tyler Moore and, definitively, with All in the Family.

The way I look at it, we live in TV eras defined by the No. 1 broadcast show. The timeline I can remember (and I&#039;m 53) went from Gunsmoke to Bonanza to Beverly Hillbillies to Laugh-In (big cultural shift there) to All in the Family to Happy Days to Dallas to Cosby Show to ER to Seinfeld to Friends to CSI to American Idol. That&#039;s just off the top of my head -- I&#039;m sure I missed some or got them wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree! Beverly Hillbillies was a huge hit, even by those Big 3-only standards. It spawned, directly or indirectly, Petticoat Junction and Green Acres. And it, along with the Andy Griffith shows (including Gomer Pyle) and Gunsmoke and Wild, Wild West, gave CBS a &#8220;rural&#8221; reputation that it intentionally repudiated in the 1970s beginning with Mary Tyler Moore and, definitively, with All in the Family.</p>
<p>The way I look at it, we live in TV eras defined by the No. 1 broadcast show. The timeline I can remember (and I&#8217;m 53) went from Gunsmoke to Bonanza to Beverly Hillbillies to Laugh-In (big cultural shift there) to All in the Family to Happy Days to Dallas to Cosby Show to ER to Seinfeld to Friends to CSI to American Idol. That&#8217;s just off the top of my head &#8212; I&#8217;m sure I missed some or got them wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michalea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michalea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62378</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Beverly Hillbillies must have been the American Idol of its time.&quot;

Not really. LOL.  This was long before cable TV came into every household in America.  At the risk of dating myself, in the 1960&#039;s there were only the big 3; CBS, ABC and NBC.  Not too much competition in those days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Beverly Hillbillies must have been the American Idol of its time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really. LOL.  This was long before cable TV came into every household in America.  At the risk of dating myself, in the 1960&#8242;s there were only the big 3; CBS, ABC and NBC.  Not too much competition in those days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62371</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 05:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62371</guid>
		<description>Bill, How about throwing up a viewers list. Top 100 shows by how many people who watched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, How about throwing up a viewers list. Top 100 shows by how many people who watched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62365</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62365</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s what I&#039;ve heard, but I still feel like I need to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve heard, but I still feel like I need to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62362</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62362</guid>
		<description>Julia, you&#039;ll not find a bigger Seinfeld fan than I, and like many others, I was disappointed in the finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, you&#8217;ll not find a bigger Seinfeld fan than I, and like many others, I was disappointed in the finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62357</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62357</guid>
		<description>the128, I remember the last Cheers episode, but I actually have never seen the last Seinfeld. I tried to once when I went to the TV &amp; Radio Museum in NYC, but it wasn&#039;t available. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the128, I remember the last Cheers episode, but I actually have never seen the last Seinfeld. I tried to once when I went to the TV &#038; Radio Museum in NYC, but it wasn&#8217;t available. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-3/#comment-62347</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62347</guid>
		<description>marlon, those are household numbers.  the total viewer numbers would be much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marlon, those are household numbers.  the total viewer numbers would be much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62345</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62345</guid>
		<description>I thought the super bowls get in the 80s and 90 million....????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the super bowls get in the 80s and 90 million&#8230;.????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62339</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62339</guid>
		<description>Cheers could have ended up being the Chuck of its day as I recall its first season had rather mediocre ratings but in those days even NBC gave a new series a chance to grow its audience but that was the early 80s before the onslaught of cable channels and execs making decisions based on premiere night metered market ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers could have ended up being the Chuck of its day as I recall its first season had rather mediocre ratings but in those days even NBC gave a new series a chance to grow its audience but that was the early 80s before the onslaught of cable channels and execs making decisions based on premiere night metered market ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62334</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62334</guid>
		<description>the series finale of Seinfeld really marked the end of an area for scripted television watched by a true mass audience.  im not old enough to even remember if i watched the last Cheers or not, but i still remember the day of the last seinfeld.  that was quite the cultural event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the series finale of Seinfeld really marked the end of an area for scripted television watched by a true mass audience.  im not old enough to even remember if i watched the last Cheers or not, but i still remember the day of the last seinfeld.  that was quite the cultural event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62332</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62332</guid>
		<description>tom, lol yes with numbers like that it could jump to the top of the renew cancel index in one week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom, lol yes with numbers like that it could jump to the top of the renew cancel index in one week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62324</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62324</guid>
		<description>If only Chuck couldcrack this list. Then it would be renewed for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only Chuck couldcrack this list. Then it would be renewed for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62310</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62310</guid>
		<description>High School Musical was insanely well-received!  They&#039;ve raised the bar for kids&#039; and &#039;tween programming :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High School Musical was insanely well-received!  They&#8217;ve raised the bar for kids&#8217; and &#8216;tween programming <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62309</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62309</guid>
		<description>Mr. Gorman, do you think the erosion of broadcast TV market share was a major factor in the decline of TV movies, miniseries, and &quot;very special&quot; episodes (e.g. MASH)?  It seems that any reasonable miniseries drew mega viewers in the 70&#039;s through the mid-80&#039;s.  Now it&#039;s rare to see such events anywhere.  I&#039;m bummed about &quot;Kings&quot; now.  Had it been a well-publicized, four-part mini series in the 80&#039;s, it could have been HUGE ;)

As for Miss America, I do remember the days before cable (I was very young) when my Dad would make a major event out of the night.  Gather the family, make popcorn, and pick your favorites, kids!  It was the 70&#039;s at that point, when I know womens&#039; groups were making major waves about pageants so focused on a woman&#039;s looks.  But still, Miss America seems so innocent compared to the weekly reality sleaze of today...oh, and Dad made big deals out of the Oscars, Grammys, and Olympics too.  Without cable, any once-a-year (or less) event was a major event I guess ;) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Gorman, do you think the erosion of broadcast TV market share was a major factor in the decline of TV movies, miniseries, and &#8220;very special&#8221; episodes (e.g. MASH)?  It seems that any reasonable miniseries drew mega viewers in the 70&#8242;s through the mid-80&#8242;s.  Now it&#8217;s rare to see such events anywhere.  I&#8217;m bummed about &#8220;Kings&#8221; now.  Had it been a well-publicized, four-part mini series in the 80&#8242;s, it could have been HUGE <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for Miss America, I do remember the days before cable (I was very young) when my Dad would make a major event out of the night.  Gather the family, make popcorn, and pick your favorites, kids!  It was the 70&#8242;s at that point, when I know womens&#8217; groups were making major waves about pageants so focused on a woman&#8217;s looks.  But still, Miss America seems so innocent compared to the weekly reality sleaze of today&#8230;oh, and Dad made big deals out of the Oscars, Grammys, and Olympics too.  Without cable, any once-a-year (or less) event was a major event I guess <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62307</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62307</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m pretty sure that either football or High School Musical 2 holds the record for biggest cable audience ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m pretty sure that either football or High School Musical 2 holds the record for biggest cable audience ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jensen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62306</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62306</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to see a similar list of cable TV biggest hits.  Then again, it would probably be WWE, WWE, WWE, and so on all the way down the list.  :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see a similar list of cable TV biggest hits.  Then again, it would probably be WWE, WWE, WWE, and so on all the way down the list.  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62297</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62297</guid>
		<description>Joe D, good observation, the early 80&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/03/updated-where-did-the-primetime-broadcast-audience-go/9079&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;began the decades long continuing erosion of broadcast TV marketshare by cable networks&lt;/a&gt;. Once that started, it was hard to get large shares of the population watching almost anything but the Super Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe D, good observation, the early 80&#8242;s <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/03/updated-where-did-the-primetime-broadcast-audience-go/9079" rel="nofollow">began the decades long continuing erosion of broadcast TV marketshare by cable networks</a>. Once that started, it was hard to get large shares of the population watching almost anything but the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62296</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62296</guid>
		<description>It seems that 1983 was the last bumper year without Super Bowl. From some of the other comments, it&#039;s apparent they weren&#039;t around then and the Top 100 list is a history lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that 1983 was the last bumper year without Super Bowl. From some of the other comments, it&#8217;s apparent they weren&#8217;t around then and the Top 100 list is a history lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62294</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62294</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that if you removed the football, you&#039;d have a &quot;Top 10&quot; list instead of a &quot;Top 100&quot;.

Not really useful including the Superbowl in such lists since it skews the results so badly.

Derek - That was sarcasm, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that if you removed the football, you&#8217;d have a &#8220;Top 10&#8243; list instead of a &#8220;Top 100&#8243;.</p>
<p>Not really useful including the Superbowl in such lists since it skews the results so badly.</p>
<p>Derek &#8211; That was sarcasm, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt2</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62288</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62288</guid>
		<description>Wow, I never knew the Miss America Pageant was such a huge event on the scale of the Superbowl championship at one time.  Amazing! It makes you wonder what started the collapse of that empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I never knew the Miss America Pageant was such a huge event on the scale of the Superbowl championship at one time.  Amazing! It makes you wonder what started the collapse of that empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joompa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62279</link>
		<dc:creator>Joompa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62279</guid>
		<description>...back when we didn&#039;t have P2P..lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;back when we didn&#8217;t have P2P..lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VlogHog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62278</link>
		<dc:creator>VlogHog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62278</guid>
		<description>If you expanded the list to 200 many of the shows that people seem to be missing would be there. This is 100 shows out of the thousands of shows shown ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you expanded the list to 200 many of the shows that people seem to be missing would be there. This is 100 shows out of the thousands of shows shown ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62276</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62276</guid>
		<description>There is nothing sad about this list at all, it&#039;s merely evidence of the wonderful variety of entertainment we enjoy today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing sad about this list at all, it&#8217;s merely evidence of the wonderful variety of entertainment we enjoy today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62264</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62264</guid>
		<description>Kind of boring. I&#039;d prefer a list that excludes the Super Bowl because well, that accounts for a good third or so of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of boring. I&#8217;d prefer a list that excludes the Super Bowl because well, that accounts for a good third or so of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kashuba</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62259</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kashuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62259</guid>
		<description>I didnt realize superbowls were counted as TV Shows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt realize superbowls were counted as TV Shows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62253</link>
		<dc:creator>josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62253</guid>
		<description>The MASH finale is up there in the top five(along with &quot;Who Shot JR?&quot;) as a remember-every-detail of when you watched it monent.  Another has to be Luke and Laura&#039;s Wedding on General Hosptial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MASH finale is up there in the top five(along with &#8220;Who Shot JR?&#8221;) as a remember-every-detail of when you watched it monent.  Another has to be Luke and Laura&#8217;s Wedding on General Hosptial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62231</guid>
		<description>Wow -- if it wasn&#039;t for football, this century wouldn&#039;t even be on the list.
Maybe showing my age here, but I&#039;m a little nostalgic for event viewing like Roots and Winds of War. With all the splintering of viewership, I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll ever see that sort of thing again. Its too bad really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; if it wasn&#8217;t for football, this century wouldn&#8217;t even be on the list.<br />
Maybe showing my age here, but I&#8217;m a little nostalgic for event viewing like Roots and Winds of War. With all the splintering of viewership, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll ever see that sort of thing again. Its too bad really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-2/#comment-62230</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62230</guid>
		<description>WOW its all boring Crap, Why would that many people be watching MASH or the superbowl? SOooo freakin BORING</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW its all boring Crap, Why would that many people be watching MASH or the superbowl? SOooo freakin BORING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62210</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62210</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the anual Wizard of Oz screening use to get 40% ratings for years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the anual Wizard of Oz screening use to get 40% ratings for years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62209</guid>
		<description>Based on the earliest show on the list a January 28, 1961 of &quot;Gunsmoke&quot; It looks like the list goes from 1961 to the present.

Makes sense since most if not all the list would have consisted of 1950&#039;s shows if that decade was included.

little Ricky&#039;s birth on &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; had a 71.7 rating in 1953, Elvis on Ed Sullivan a 82.6 rating in 1956</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the earliest show on the list a January 28, 1961 of &#8220;Gunsmoke&#8221; It looks like the list goes from 1961 to the present.</p>
<p>Makes sense since most if not all the list would have consisted of 1950&#8242;s shows if that decade was included.</p>
<p>little Ricky&#8217;s birth on &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; had a 71.7 rating in 1953, Elvis on Ed Sullivan a 82.6 rating in 1956</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62195</guid>
		<description>Jose, good question. Apparently not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose, good question. Apparently not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62194</guid>
		<description>So were the shows of 1950&#039;s taken into account? Doesn&#039;t seem like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So were the shows of 1950&#8242;s taken into account? Doesn&#8217;t seem like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5506</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62164</link>
		<dc:creator>5506</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62164</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that all of the episodes of &quot;roots&quot; are in the top 100 shows of all time. THAT&#039;S OUTSTANDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that all of the episodes of &#8220;roots&#8221; are in the top 100 shows of all time. THAT&#8217;S OUTSTANDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/21/top-100-rated-tv-shows-of-all-time/14922/comment-page-1/#comment-62134</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=14922#comment-62134</guid>
		<description>Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan drama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan drama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

