<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Ratings: NCAA cruises to victory, Dollhouse drops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim P</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-67524</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-67524</guid>
		<description>Too Bad for Dollhouse. I like Whedons shows, but the first 5 episodes I honestly didn&#039;t see as great. That being said, the liked the last 3 episodes. I wonder how expensive it is to make? Too bad the show doesn&#039;t fit the CW&#039;s demo target, it could be a Friday hit for them. Maybe SyFy could pick them up to replace BSG on Fridays when Fox gives the show the axe. I still believe the NCAA tournament is affecting the show, as we get to the final 4 the more people will be watching. We will soon find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too Bad for Dollhouse. I like Whedons shows, but the first 5 episodes I honestly didn&#8217;t see as great. That being said, the liked the last 3 episodes. I wonder how expensive it is to make? Too bad the show doesn&#8217;t fit the CW&#8217;s demo target, it could be a Friday hit for them. Maybe SyFy could pick them up to replace BSG on Fridays when Fox gives the show the axe. I still believe the NCAA tournament is affecting the show, as we get to the final 4 the more people will be watching. We will soon find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-66088</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-66088</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;people have been watching less TV ever since the writer’s strike season.&lt;/i&gt;

That is wrong. Evidence shows that people are watchin more TV than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>people have been watching less TV ever since the writer’s strike season.</i></p>
<p>That is wrong. Evidence shows that people are watchin more TV than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-66080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-66080</guid>
		<description>Omg, you guys basically 1) Either don&#039;t know how to read or 2) are just so stupid that you don&#039;t understand what I am saying...

I did not say TSCC has a good chance to renew. I did not say I am ignoring the numbers that TSCC is in great danger... So I don&#039;t understand, why are you repeating yourselves? Are you retarded?

I was simply saying that there is no reason for you to keep saying the ratings of the show are horrible and how much you are sure it will be canceled. No one cares, just shut up already? 

You are welcome to comment on &quot;the ratings this week indicate ______&quot;
You are welcome to comment on &quot;the show needs to achieve at least ____ million viewers to have a chance at season 3&quot; 

Someone will care. But no one is going &quot;so you guys think it will be canceled?&quot; So why are you answering that question constantly? We already know the show is most likely going to be canceled... That doesn&#039;t mean the show has 0 chance of being renewed. 

Share news, don&#039;t be a the deliverer of the obvious.


And YOUUU are factually incorrect:::
TSCC WAS one of the TOP shows on Fox, at the premiere of Season 2. As well as a later episode. It bled viewers yes, but only about a million from the premiere level, which is not surprising. 

There were so many other shows available, and people have been watching less TV ever since the writer&#039;s strike season. Online viewership is higher than ever, especially after the writer&#039;s strike. These are all factors that say to an executive &quot;things are not the way it seems.&quot; The measuring stick has changed. And it would be absurd for researchers at a network to ignore these facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omg, you guys basically 1) Either don&#8217;t know how to read or 2) are just so stupid that you don&#8217;t understand what I am saying&#8230;</p>
<p>I did not say TSCC has a good chance to renew. I did not say I am ignoring the numbers that TSCC is in great danger&#8230; So I don&#8217;t understand, why are you repeating yourselves? Are you retarded?</p>
<p>I was simply saying that there is no reason for you to keep saying the ratings of the show are horrible and how much you are sure it will be canceled. No one cares, just shut up already? </p>
<p>You are welcome to comment on &#8220;the ratings this week indicate ______&#8221;<br />
You are welcome to comment on &#8220;the show needs to achieve at least ____ million viewers to have a chance at season 3&#8243; </p>
<p>Someone will care. But no one is going &#8220;so you guys think it will be canceled?&#8221; So why are you answering that question constantly? We already know the show is most likely going to be canceled&#8230; That doesn&#8217;t mean the show has 0 chance of being renewed. </p>
<p>Share news, don&#8217;t be a the deliverer of the obvious.</p>
<p>And YOUUU are factually incorrect:::<br />
TSCC WAS one of the TOP shows on Fox, at the premiere of Season 2. As well as a later episode. It bled viewers yes, but only about a million from the premiere level, which is not surprising. </p>
<p>There were so many other shows available, and people have been watching less TV ever since the writer&#8217;s strike season. Online viewership is higher than ever, especially after the writer&#8217;s strike. These are all factors that say to an executive &#8220;things are not the way it seems.&#8221; The measuring stick has changed. And it would be absurd for researchers at a network to ignore these facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Review: Dollhouse - Echoes &#124; The Movie Reviewer</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65894</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Review: Dollhouse - Echoes &#124; The Movie Reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65894</guid>
		<description>[...] last week, how on earth did this week&#8217;s Nielsen ratings slip back downwards?! Dollhouse lost 250,000 audience members and 2 tenths of a point in the 18-49 market share. Maybe DVR numbers will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, how on earth did this week&#8217;s Nielsen ratings slip back downwards?! Dollhouse lost 250,000 audience members and 2 tenths of a point in the 18-49 market share. Maybe DVR numbers will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Review: Dollhouse - Echoes - Film School Rejects</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65721</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Review: Dollhouse - Echoes - Film School Rejects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65721</guid>
		<description>[...] last week, how on earth did this week&#8217;s Nielsen ratings slip back downwards?! Dollhouse lost 250,000 audience members and 2 tenths of a point in the 18-49 market share. Maybe DVR numbers will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, how on earth did this week&#8217;s Nielsen ratings slip back downwards?! Dollhouse lost 250,000 audience members and 2 tenths of a point in the 18-49 market share. Maybe DVR numbers will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65452</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be very surprised if T:SCC goes up next week, last Friday&#039;s episode was very Sarah centric and pretty much undid the JC development in the previous episode. It was much more like those episodes that lost viewers than those that gained viewers.

I suspect a fairly substantial number of T:SCC viewers are people who are waiting for closure rather than people who look forward to it every week. My wife and I are certainly part of the former group and of the people we know personally, the same view prevails. It&#039;s unfortunate.

Does anyone know the half-hourly figures for T:SCC this week? Did it gain or lose substantial numbers of viewers as it ran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very surprised if T:SCC goes up next week, last Friday&#8217;s episode was very Sarah centric and pretty much undid the JC development in the previous episode. It was much more like those episodes that lost viewers than those that gained viewers.</p>
<p>I suspect a fairly substantial number of T:SCC viewers are people who are waiting for closure rather than people who look forward to it every week. My wife and I are certainly part of the former group and of the people we know personally, the same view prevails. It&#8217;s unfortunate.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the half-hourly figures for T:SCC this week? Did it gain or lose substantial numbers of viewers as it ran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hagi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65382</link>
		<dc:creator>hagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65382</guid>
		<description>TSSC&#039;s increase in ratings continues, according to final numbers, total viewers increased from 3.72 m to 3.87 m, demo stays flat 1.3. If this trend continues this week, total number may be more than 4m...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSSC&#8217;s increase in ratings continues, according to final numbers, total viewers increased from 3.72 m to 3.87 m, demo stays flat 1.3. If this trend continues this week, total number may be more than 4m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65359</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65359</guid>
		<description>RJ, but Dollhouse went up to 1.4 in the demo, so it is no longer tied with TSCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RJ, but Dollhouse went up to 1.4 in the demo, so it is no longer tied with TSCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65337</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65337</guid>
		<description>I just saw the finals and Dollhouse fell below T:SCC is terms of viewers! Haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw the finals and Dollhouse fell below T:SCC is terms of viewers! Haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65336</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65336</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse is a huge failure. I love you numbers guys, though. So desperate. In five years what % of 18-35 year olds are 18-49? I want it NOW, renegade angel. I told you Castle and Lipstick Jungle and Belly and Motherhood ... can it be women have really adapted to the electroworld? Can it be they have cut us loose and are no longer under our thumb? Can it be P and G are going the way of GM and IBM? Are women really free? Only joshing. But it makes me wonder who will catch lightning in  a bottle like Jesus or larry david or Whedon did. These TV exercs must be shi##ing bricks ... I love it, and so does Shakti and Yog Sototh. Brains, brains, brains ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse is a huge failure. I love you numbers guys, though. So desperate. In five years what % of 18-35 year olds are 18-49? I want it NOW, renegade angel. I told you Castle and Lipstick Jungle and Belly and Motherhood &#8230; can it be women have really adapted to the electroworld? Can it be they have cut us loose and are no longer under our thumb? Can it be P and G are going the way of GM and IBM? Are women really free? Only joshing. But it makes me wonder who will catch lightning in  a bottle like Jesus or larry david or Whedon did. These TV exercs must be shi##ing bricks &#8230; I love it, and so does Shakti and Yog Sototh. Brains, brains, brains &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gossi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65219</link>
		<dc:creator>gossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65219</guid>
		<description>FRIENDS was one of the highest rated sitcoms of it&#039;s decade which sold internationally incredibly well to networks all over the world due to it&#039;s universal appeal.

It doesn&#039;t matter if you like a show.  This is a website about ratings.  About profit and loss.  If you&#039;re invested emotionally in a TV show, you&#039;re probably in the wrong place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FRIENDS was one of the highest rated sitcoms of it&#8217;s decade which sold internationally incredibly well to networks all over the world due to it&#8217;s universal appeal.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if you like a show.  This is a website about ratings.  About profit and loss.  If you&#8217;re invested emotionally in a TV show, you&#8217;re probably in the wrong place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey M</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65206</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse has gotten better but like some people mentioned, is it too late?
I think with a stronger actress in the main part (Amy Acker anyone?) it may have done better but I don&#039;t think Eliza can pull off the range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse has gotten better but like some people mentioned, is it too late?<br />
I think with a stronger actress in the main part (Amy Acker anyone?) it may have done better but I don&#8217;t think Eliza can pull off the range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65098</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65098</guid>
		<description>RG, last season it was Moonlight, which managed to spread well into this season. Next season another new Friday night failure will come along to spark discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RG, last season it was Moonlight, which managed to spread well into this season. Next season another new Friday night failure will come along to spark discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65091</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65091</guid>
		<description>I think when DOLLHOUSE &amp; SARAH are &quot;executed&quot; - TV by The Numbers has to wonder - will it kill some of the traffic that comes thru this site for Saturday thru Monday chats...and what will people talk about then on the weekends...? What...Super Nanny ratings...? I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when DOLLHOUSE &amp; SARAH are &#8220;executed&#8221; &#8211; TV by The Numbers has to wonder &#8211; will it kill some of the traffic that comes thru this site for Saturday thru Monday chats&#8230;and what will people talk about then on the weekends&#8230;? What&#8230;Super Nanny ratings&#8230;? I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65054</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65054</guid>
		<description>&quot;TSCC was one of TOPPPPPPPP SHOWS on Fox&quot;

Jonathan that&#039;s just factually incorrect. 

The only point in time that TSCC was a top show on Fox was during its first season when it was the only show on television and even then it somehow managed to bleed viewers on a weekly basis, which is a somewhat impressive achievement. However at no point during its second season was TSCC one of Fox&#039;s top shows, the opposite is in fact true - it was (and remains) one of their worst performing shows of the season.

Having said that if you want to continue to hope that TSCC is renewed and if you wish to continue to state that hope then go for it but don&#039;t expect others who disagree to simply sit on their hands. If you want to post that you think the show could come back you have to accept that others are going to post that it won&#039;t. 

In terms of what TSCC needs to get renewed as has been said already - it needs a miracle. There are a handful of episodes left and across those episodes it needs to go up a point in the demo but even then I wouldn&#039;t promise a pick-up for a third season. At this point TSCC has sunk too low for too long to make it a worthwhile investment for Fox. Especially as its not &#039;their&#039; show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TSCC was one of TOPPPPPPPP SHOWS on Fox&#8221;</p>
<p>Jonathan that&#8217;s just factually incorrect. </p>
<p>The only point in time that TSCC was a top show on Fox was during its first season when it was the only show on television and even then it somehow managed to bleed viewers on a weekly basis, which is a somewhat impressive achievement. However at no point during its second season was TSCC one of Fox&#8217;s top shows, the opposite is in fact true &#8211; it was (and remains) one of their worst performing shows of the season.</p>
<p>Having said that if you want to continue to hope that TSCC is renewed and if you wish to continue to state that hope then go for it but don&#8217;t expect others who disagree to simply sit on their hands. If you want to post that you think the show could come back you have to accept that others are going to post that it won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>In terms of what TSCC needs to get renewed as has been said already &#8211; it needs a miracle. There are a handful of episodes left and across those episodes it needs to go up a point in the demo but even then I wouldn&#8217;t promise a pick-up for a third season. At this point TSCC has sunk too low for too long to make it a worthwhile investment for Fox. Especially as its not &#8216;their&#8217; show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65051</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65051</guid>
		<description>@ Richard Steven Hack

It took me a while but I know where you&#039;re coming from. Like you I had massive expectations when I saw the pilot of TSCC. I was misled and thought it would be about the fight between man and machine. It seems it&#039;s a one woman show. Like the name says The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Huge mistake. 

They should&#039;ve centered it around John Connor and\or Cameron against Skynet. I still don&#039;t know about Dekker but Glau is an incredibly talented actress and you don&#039;t bench your star quarterback! Some episodes have her standing around somewhere in the background saying nothing. Add that she has 2 minutes of screentime in like 3 episodes or something and you get the drift. Josh Friedman can make a succesfull Terminator show but he needs to be pushed to do the right things, not come to terms with his own illness and set that in the show.

Summer Glau, you are better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Richard Steven Hack</p>
<p>It took me a while but I know where you&#8217;re coming from. Like you I had massive expectations when I saw the pilot of TSCC. I was misled and thought it would be about the fight between man and machine. It seems it&#8217;s a one woman show. Like the name says The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Huge mistake. </p>
<p>They should&#8217;ve centered it around John Connor and\or Cameron against Skynet. I still don&#8217;t know about Dekker but Glau is an incredibly talented actress and you don&#8217;t bench your star quarterback! Some episodes have her standing around somewhere in the background saying nothing. Add that she has 2 minutes of screentime in like 3 episodes or something and you get the drift. Josh Friedman can make a succesfull Terminator show but he needs to be pushed to do the right things, not come to terms with his own illness and set that in the show.</p>
<p>Summer Glau, you are better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65049</link>
		<dc:creator>S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65049</guid>
		<description>Come on people, be kind to Jonathan, he is just filling the void created by Brooke Shields finally admitting that Lipstick Jungle is not coming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people, be kind to Jonathan, he is just filling the void created by Brooke Shields finally admitting that Lipstick Jungle is not coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djm</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65042</link>
		<dc:creator>djm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65042</guid>
		<description>of course it does boris...

Jonathan, welcome to reality, we&#039;ve been waiting for you. oh wait.. thats not right.. you still think tscc might get renewed.. never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course it does boris&#8230;</p>
<p>Jonathan, welcome to reality, we&#8217;ve been waiting for you. oh wait.. thats not right.. you still think tscc might get renewed.. never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-12/#comment-65039</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65039</guid>
		<description>Richard Steven Hack says:

&quot;I’ll re-iterate once again for people who can’t read: TSCC is one of only FOUR shows I even bother to watch&quot;

Does this get you a decoder ring or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Steven Hack says:</p>
<p>&#8220;I’ll re-iterate once again for people who can’t read: TSCC is one of only FOUR shows I even bother to watch&#8221;</p>
<p>Does this get you a decoder ring or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65034</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65034</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan: I&#039;d agree with you to a point, if this was a TSCC fan forum and everybody would just show up to crush your hopes and dreams, but actually it&#039;s pretty much the other way around. 
You are coming to a site about TV ratings and although it&#039;s completely obvious that TSCC&#039;s ratings are horrible, that they are the worst of anything on TV, that they suck as hard as they possibly could, you insist everyone should have to pet your hair and tell you the show will survive based solely on it&#039;s dubious quality and its lackluster DVD sales. 

What you apparently need a reality check about even more than TSCC renewel prospects is your attitude on the internet. The internet is not your save space and you do not get to set the rules of interaction most places. 

If TSCC ending is really compareble to the end of the world to you and you cannot know about it, then don&#039;t fricking seek out ratings discussions. Stay on fan boards or better yet far far away from the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan: I&#8217;d agree with you to a point, if this was a TSCC fan forum and everybody would just show up to crush your hopes and dreams, but actually it&#8217;s pretty much the other way around.<br />
You are coming to a site about TV ratings and although it&#8217;s completely obvious that TSCC&#8217;s ratings are horrible, that they are the worst of anything on TV, that they suck as hard as they possibly could, you insist everyone should have to pet your hair and tell you the show will survive based solely on it&#8217;s dubious quality and its lackluster DVD sales. </p>
<p>What you apparently need a reality check about even more than TSCC renewel prospects is your attitude on the internet. The internet is not your save space and you do not get to set the rules of interaction most places. </p>
<p>If TSCC ending is really compareble to the end of the world to you and you cannot know about it, then don&#8217;t fricking seek out ratings discussions. Stay on fan boards or better yet far far away from the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy01</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65033</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65033</guid>
		<description>S. - don&#039;t give dollhouse fans excuses/ideas, next week we will have &#039;its numbers were down cus people weren&#039;t watching it for lent&#039;, religion is to blame for dollhouses bad numbers lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S. &#8211; don&#8217;t give dollhouse fans excuses/ideas, next week we will have &#8216;its numbers were down cus people weren&#8217;t watching it for lent&#8217;, religion is to blame for dollhouses bad numbers lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65030</link>
		<dc:creator>S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65030</guid>
		<description>Sammy01, it&#039;s lent. People do all kinds of sacrifices during lent. Watching all the first 5 episodes of Dollhouse would count as sacrifice, and to the atonement of one&#039;s sins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy01, it&#8217;s lent. People do all kinds of sacrifices during lent. Watching all the first 5 episodes of Dollhouse would count as sacrifice, and to the atonement of one&#8217;s sins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy01</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65024</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65024</guid>
		<description>nick - why watch it if you admit its bad, i don&#039;t understand. i don&#039;t like lost i wont sit watching it even if im home and its on, i have a million other stations, music, internet, heck i could even tidy and clean (well maybe not the last one). i find it odd you watch a show you see as flawed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nick &#8211; why watch it if you admit its bad, i don&#8217;t understand. i don&#8217;t like lost i wont sit watching it even if im home and its on, i have a million other stations, music, internet, heck i could even tidy and clean (well maybe not the last one). i find it odd you watch a show you see as flawed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65013</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65013</guid>
		<description>To the person who says why don;&#039;t more people watch Dollhouse, well I do watch it  (because I&#039;m stuck at home for the last few weeks and will be for a few more) and the bottom line is it&#039;s a bad show. Really bad. I don&#039;t know who they have writting it but the ideas are crap and its all over the place. amatuer. maybe if josh w. had hired better people, but that&#039;s what you get i guess.

So to answer your question - why aren&#039;t more people watching it? - well, it isn&#039;t good. Not even okay. It&#039;s just bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the person who says why don;&#8217;t more people watch Dollhouse, well I do watch it  (because I&#8217;m stuck at home for the last few weeks and will be for a few more) and the bottom line is it&#8217;s a bad show. Really bad. I don&#8217;t know who they have writting it but the ideas are crap and its all over the place. amatuer. maybe if josh w. had hired better people, but that&#8217;s what you get i guess.</p>
<p>So to answer your question &#8211; why aren&#8217;t more people watching it? &#8211; well, it isn&#8217;t good. Not even okay. It&#8217;s just bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-65003</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-65003</guid>
		<description>Jonathan: &quot;A positive person would say “TSCC needs ____ to be renewed”

I&#039;ve made recommendations for the show to be improved all season long on the TSCC sites. So did other fans. The complaints were obvious. 

Friedman didn&#039;t give a damn - he had his game plan and he executed it until apparently somebody at Fox told him the show was dead if he kept executing it.

So he crammed as much of the recommendations as he could into, what, the last three or four episodes, in a desperate attempt to keep the show alive? 

So now the show is dead. It has nothing to do with bashing, it has to do with clowns like you who come on here and proclaim it&#039;s NOT dead based on nothing but wishful thinking. 

I&#039;ll re-iterate once again for people who can&#039;t read: TSCC is one of only FOUR shows I even bother to watch (the other three are Fringe, Leverage and Dollhouse). And I have to download it to do that -  not just flip on the TV or the DVR.  The show has occupied a massive amount of my time since it debuted - in fact, before then, since I downloaded the original pilot months before. I eagerly awaited every episode during season one. I eagerly awaited the first episode of season two. I eagerly awaited every episode of season two - until it started to develop serious problems. Even then, I watched every episode hoping Josh would surprise me and deal with the problems.

Didn&#039;t happen. The show got worse and worse.

And now we find out from Josh&#039;s Wired article that he never DID get what Terminator was about. For him, it was all about &quot;mortality&quot; and cancer because he had cancer. It was ALWAYS a &quot;family drama&quot; for him. Nothing else mattered.

And that&#039;s why the show bombed. Because it was never Terminator except for more or less nine episodes in season one. And had it gone 22 episodes in season one, it would have died in season one and probably never been renewed for season two.

So, yes, I&#039;m pissed off. I&#039;m pissed off that one of my favorite shows, a show with the potential to be the biggest hit on television and set the bar for sci-fi on broadcast TV for the next decade, was turned into crap and canceled.

And it pisses me off that a bunch of morons cheered that on because THEY didn&#039;t get what Terminator was about, or they didn&#039;t want to seem like they weren&#039;t mindless supporters of whatever Josh decided to stuff down their throats.

Which is why I don&#039;t call myself a &quot;fan&quot; of anything, because it&#039;s just such behavior that gives being a &quot;fan&quot; of anything a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan: &#8220;A positive person would say “TSCC needs ____ to be renewed”</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made recommendations for the show to be improved all season long on the TSCC sites. So did other fans. The complaints were obvious. </p>
<p>Friedman didn&#8217;t give a damn &#8211; he had his game plan and he executed it until apparently somebody at Fox told him the show was dead if he kept executing it.</p>
<p>So he crammed as much of the recommendations as he could into, what, the last three or four episodes, in a desperate attempt to keep the show alive? </p>
<p>So now the show is dead. It has nothing to do with bashing, it has to do with clowns like you who come on here and proclaim it&#8217;s NOT dead based on nothing but wishful thinking. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll re-iterate once again for people who can&#8217;t read: TSCC is one of only FOUR shows I even bother to watch (the other three are Fringe, Leverage and Dollhouse). And I have to download it to do that &#8211;  not just flip on the TV or the DVR.  The show has occupied a massive amount of my time since it debuted &#8211; in fact, before then, since I downloaded the original pilot months before. I eagerly awaited every episode during season one. I eagerly awaited the first episode of season two. I eagerly awaited every episode of season two &#8211; until it started to develop serious problems. Even then, I watched every episode hoping Josh would surprise me and deal with the problems.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t happen. The show got worse and worse.</p>
<p>And now we find out from Josh&#8217;s Wired article that he never DID get what Terminator was about. For him, it was all about &#8220;mortality&#8221; and cancer because he had cancer. It was ALWAYS a &#8220;family drama&#8221; for him. Nothing else mattered.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why the show bombed. Because it was never Terminator except for more or less nine episodes in season one. And had it gone 22 episodes in season one, it would have died in season one and probably never been renewed for season two.</p>
<p>So, yes, I&#8217;m pissed off. I&#8217;m pissed off that one of my favorite shows, a show with the potential to be the biggest hit on television and set the bar for sci-fi on broadcast TV for the next decade, was turned into crap and canceled.</p>
<p>And it pisses me off that a bunch of morons cheered that on because THEY didn&#8217;t get what Terminator was about, or they didn&#8217;t want to seem like they weren&#8217;t mindless supporters of whatever Josh decided to stuff down their throats.</p>
<p>Which is why I don&#8217;t call myself a &#8220;fan&#8221; of anything, because it&#8217;s just such behavior that gives being a &#8220;fan&#8221; of anything a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64998</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64998</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sans remote free I do not think Dollhouse’s C3 ratings would be disproportionately better than average as they are WITH remote free.&quot;

It doesn&#039;t speak to C3 per se, but last Friday&#039;s episode left me wondering whether Remote-Free might be a double-edged sword.  It seemed to come on as a jumble, and between washing a few forks (the TV&#039;s in the kitchen) and stepping out to cop a square during the breaks, halfway through I realized I didn&#039;t really know what was going on.

Well, I thought, I can always rewatch it on-line.  Shortly thereafter, it occurred to me that I had already blown seven hours in exchange for a few entertaining moments in the form of Harry Lennix, and I tossed the project out the figurative window.

The point isn&#039;t so much to knock on Dollhouse as it is to speculate whether the demand placed upon the viewer by the Remote-Free treatment might actually serve to speed the exodus of viewers from any given show that isn&#039;t perceived as living up to its end of the bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sans remote free I do not think Dollhouse’s C3 ratings would be disproportionately better than average as they are WITH remote free.&#8221;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t speak to C3 per se, but last Friday&#8217;s episode left me wondering whether Remote-Free might be a double-edged sword.  It seemed to come on as a jumble, and between washing a few forks (the TV&#8217;s in the kitchen) and stepping out to cop a square during the breaks, halfway through I realized I didn&#8217;t really know what was going on.</p>
<p>Well, I thought, I can always rewatch it on-line.  Shortly thereafter, it occurred to me that I had already blown seven hours in exchange for a few entertaining moments in the form of Harry Lennix, and I tossed the project out the figurative window.</p>
<p>The point isn&#8217;t so much to knock on Dollhouse as it is to speculate whether the demand placed upon the viewer by the Remote-Free treatment might actually serve to speed the exodus of viewers from any given show that isn&#8217;t perceived as living up to its end of the bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64997</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64997</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, for the last time, TSCC was the third worst scripted show on Fox before the break and they almost cancelled it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, for the last time, TSCC was the third worst scripted show on Fox before the break and they almost cancelled it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64995</guid>
		<description>@Ronald Helfrich, How I met your mother can be funny at times...
But I do agree Friends is so cliche and unfunny that I can&#039;t believe it ever received a second season. I guess hot chicks are important.

But I do believe you&#039;re missing a component. While Joss Whedon is a great writer, his shows can be extremely strange or odd. Dollhouse is beyond the most strange show I have ever seen/heard of other than maybe 4400 or Heroes... And shows like this are way too strange to keep a sustained audience. 

On the other hand, while Star Trek, Star Wars, are also quite strange, it isn&#039;t as far fetched as we think, in distant futures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ronald Helfrich, How I met your mother can be funny at times&#8230;<br />
But I do agree Friends is so cliche and unfunny that I can&#8217;t believe it ever received a second season. I guess hot chicks are important.</p>
<p>But I do believe you&#8217;re missing a component. While Joss Whedon is a great writer, his shows can be extremely strange or odd. Dollhouse is beyond the most strange show I have ever seen/heard of other than maybe 4400 or Heroes&#8230; And shows like this are way too strange to keep a sustained audience. </p>
<p>On the other hand, while Star Trek, Star Wars, are also quite strange, it isn&#8217;t as far fetched as we think, in distant futures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64994</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t get is why some of you people have this pathological desire to bash everyone else&#039;s hopes... You&#039;re so negative it&#039;s not even funny.

A positive person would say &quot;TSCC needs ____ to be renewed&quot;, instead all you keep saying and repeating and repeating like a bunch of bots is &quot;TSCC is dead, it had HORRIBLE ratings Monday it had HORRIBLE RATINGS NOW ITS DEAD DIE DAMNIT!&quot; It&#039;s like you win a bet or something when you are proven correct. Regardless, everyone hates you. (Most of my comments refer to RHS and Julia)

Seriously, I&#039;m not commenting on here on how bad I think Dollhouse is, even though I&#039;ve been a long time fan of Whedon... I&#039;m not here commenting on how this or that show will get canceled for sure... Why bother? Who&#039;s gonna care?

This is like predicting the end of the world... Even if you&#039;re right, why would anyone want to know if there is nothing they can do about it? Hence, why &quot;Knowing&quot; is such a critical flop (though made lotta money because people thought there was hope).

I think both Dollhouse and TSCC have a chance. All you people do is speculate. You know it&#039;s easy to cancel comedy shows and sitcoms, it happens all the time, scripted shows can be improved, sitcoms cannot easily be improved. If JF made a secret deal with Fox about creative direction of the next season, and so they agreed to allow another season, you wouldn&#039;t know... So what&#039;s your point of speculating? 

Is there an email from the angels telling you &quot;QUICK JULIA/RICHARD-STEVEN-HACKS YOU MUST WARN THE PEOPLE AND FANS OF DOLLHOUSE AND TSCC THAT THE SHOW WILL BE CANCELED, YOU MUST INFORM THEM BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!! PS: Be sure to emphasize they cannot stop it and nothing they can do about it!&quot;

So please look in a mirror, and the next time you post a comment think &quot;does anyone really want this speculation and negative opinion from me?&quot; 

Furthermore, before Season 2 break... TSCC was one of TOPPPPPPPP SHOWS on Fox. Relative rankings were: 5th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 7th... And with such a LOWWWWW sample, they had a break of 2 weeks then another break of 1 week, a complete audience disconnect... And just as it was building up back to it&#039;s previous state, they made a TWWWWWOOOOO MONTH BREAK, and the show continued on Friday.
The fact that the show has even had 3.7 mil people still watching it, was a MIRACLE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t get is why some of you people have this pathological desire to bash everyone else&#8217;s hopes&#8230; You&#8217;re so negative it&#8217;s not even funny.</p>
<p>A positive person would say &#8220;TSCC needs ____ to be renewed&#8221;, instead all you keep saying and repeating and repeating like a bunch of bots is &#8220;TSCC is dead, it had HORRIBLE ratings Monday it had HORRIBLE RATINGS NOW ITS DEAD DIE DAMNIT!&#8221; It&#8217;s like you win a bet or something when you are proven correct. Regardless, everyone hates you. (Most of my comments refer to RHS and Julia)</p>
<p>Seriously, I&#8217;m not commenting on here on how bad I think Dollhouse is, even though I&#8217;ve been a long time fan of Whedon&#8230; I&#8217;m not here commenting on how this or that show will get canceled for sure&#8230; Why bother? Who&#8217;s gonna care?</p>
<p>This is like predicting the end of the world&#8230; Even if you&#8217;re right, why would anyone want to know if there is nothing they can do about it? Hence, why &#8220;Knowing&#8221; is such a critical flop (though made lotta money because people thought there was hope).</p>
<p>I think both Dollhouse and TSCC have a chance. All you people do is speculate. You know it&#8217;s easy to cancel comedy shows and sitcoms, it happens all the time, scripted shows can be improved, sitcoms cannot easily be improved. If JF made a secret deal with Fox about creative direction of the next season, and so they agreed to allow another season, you wouldn&#8217;t know&#8230; So what&#8217;s your point of speculating? </p>
<p>Is there an email from the angels telling you &#8220;QUICK JULIA/RICHARD-STEVEN-HACKS YOU MUST WARN THE PEOPLE AND FANS OF DOLLHOUSE AND TSCC THAT THE SHOW WILL BE CANCELED, YOU MUST INFORM THEM BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!! PS: Be sure to emphasize they cannot stop it and nothing they can do about it!&#8221;</p>
<p>So please look in a mirror, and the next time you post a comment think &#8220;does anyone really want this speculation and negative opinion from me?&#8221; </p>
<p>Furthermore, before Season 2 break&#8230; TSCC was one of TOPPPPPPPP SHOWS on Fox. Relative rankings were: 5th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 7th&#8230; And with such a LOWWWWW sample, they had a break of 2 weeks then another break of 1 week, a complete audience disconnect&#8230; And just as it was building up back to it&#8217;s previous state, they made a TWWWWWOOOOO MONTH BREAK, and the show continued on Friday.<br />
The fact that the show has even had 3.7 mil people still watching it, was a MIRACLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoJo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64990</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64990</guid>
		<description>Ronald Helfrich: So Americans are stupid because they don&#039;t watch Joss Whedon&#039;s shows. Since every idea that he&#039;s ever came up with original appeared in comic books (usually from the 1970s to mid-1980s), can you tell me what advanced degree courses I can attend so I can impress people with my knowledge--because I have a buttload of old comics in the attic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Helfrich: So Americans are stupid because they don&#8217;t watch Joss Whedon&#8217;s shows. Since every idea that he&#8217;s ever came up with original appeared in comic books (usually from the 1970s to mid-1980s), can you tell me what advanced degree courses I can attend so I can impress people with my knowledge&#8211;because I have a buttload of old comics in the attic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gossi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64979</link>
		<dc:creator>gossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64979</guid>
		<description>Audience numbers = profit, Ronald.  Networks are businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audience numbers = profit, Ronald.  Networks are businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Helfrich</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Helfrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64978</guid>
		<description>Since hordes of people go out to see junk like Adam Sandler movies, Will Ferrell movies, and hordes of juvenile sf and horror movies that are as about intelligent as a wet noodle, it doesn&#039;t take a brain surgeon or rocket scientist to figure out the nature of the viewing habits of the average American. Most Americans don&#039;t like anything that requires more than a college sophomore party mentality (think Sean Penn in Fast Times--a wonderful parody). Most Americans prefer to watch mediocre crap like Friends or How I Met Your Mother as opposed to thoughtful and well written shows like Dollhouse. These are, after all, the same geniuses that think that audience numbers equal quality. C&#039;est la vie. Beam me up Mr. Gumby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since hordes of people go out to see junk like Adam Sandler movies, Will Ferrell movies, and hordes of juvenile sf and horror movies that are as about intelligent as a wet noodle, it doesn&#8217;t take a brain surgeon or rocket scientist to figure out the nature of the viewing habits of the average American. Most Americans don&#8217;t like anything that requires more than a college sophomore party mentality (think Sean Penn in Fast Times&#8211;a wonderful parody). Most Americans prefer to watch mediocre crap like Friends or How I Met Your Mother as opposed to thoughtful and well written shows like Dollhouse. These are, after all, the same geniuses that think that audience numbers equal quality. C&#8217;est la vie. Beam me up Mr. Gumby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gossi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64977</link>
		<dc:creator>gossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64977</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Robert and Julia.  If Remote Free doesn&#039;t reappear - and I doubt it will since they had terrible problems selling the spots - it makes returning it very much more difficult.

Also - “We would like to renew DOLLHOUSE.”  Where&#039;s that from?

In terms of DOLLHOUSE news, I&#039;ve got one bit - the sets are still up.  I checked.  FOX have shot an episode of BONES on them, and a pilot, but they&#039;ve asked the sets remain on the soundstage.  So they&#039;re clearly waiting it out some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Robert and Julia.  If Remote Free doesn&#8217;t reappear &#8211; and I doubt it will since they had terrible problems selling the spots &#8211; it makes returning it very much more difficult.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; “We would like to renew DOLLHOUSE.”  Where&#8217;s that from?</p>
<p>In terms of DOLLHOUSE news, I&#8217;ve got one bit &#8211; the sets are still up.  I checked.  FOX have shot an episode of BONES on them, and a pilot, but they&#8217;ve asked the sets remain on the soundstage.  So they&#8217;re clearly waiting it out some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64967</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64967</guid>
		<description>Nick, I don&#039;t think you are stupid, and I know that C3 matters.  

Sans remote free I do not think Dollhouse&#039;s C3 ratings would be disproportionately better than average as they are WITH remote free. You seem to agree with that.  Where we disagree is that you don&#039;t seem to think that matters. For similar reasons as Julia, I do think it matters.  A lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I don&#8217;t think you are stupid, and I know that C3 matters.  </p>
<p>Sans remote free I do not think Dollhouse&#8217;s C3 ratings would be disproportionately better than average as they are WITH remote free. You seem to agree with that.  Where we disagree is that you don&#8217;t seem to think that matters. For similar reasons as Julia, I do think it matters.  A lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64965</guid>
		<description>Y, the &quot;ratings have been pretty good&quot; is the only part of that statement that&#039;s objectively wrong, and it certainly is. The rest is just subjective evaluation of the show&#039;s content that people can, and do, argue about to no end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y, the &#8220;ratings have been pretty good&#8221; is the only part of that statement that&#8217;s objectively wrong, and it certainly is. The rest is just subjective evaluation of the show&#8217;s content that people can, and do, argue about to no end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64964</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64964</guid>
		<description>Y in fairness to them until this weeks epiosde the show had seemingly leveled off in 1.5 region. Why they called that pretty good I don&#039;t know although...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y in fairness to them until this weeks epiosde the show had seemingly leveled off in 1.5 region. Why they called that pretty good I don&#8217;t know although&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64963</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64963</guid>
		<description>Never underestimate how stupid people can be Julia!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never underestimate how stupid people can be Julia!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64961</link>
		<dc:creator>Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64961</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand is how could iFMagazine make this statement when the ratings are so awful?

http://www.ifmagazine.com/review.asp?article=3133
DOLLHOUSE has thankfully found its way. Let’s hope it wasn’t too late. The ratings have been pretty good and creatively it’s hitting its stride, so let’s hope by finally getting invested in the show, Fox doesn’t pull the plug just as its getting pretty damn good. Boy would that make so many of us REALLY angry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is how could iFMagazine make this statement when the ratings are so awful?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ifmagazine.com/review.asp?article=3133" rel="nofollow">http://www.ifmagazine.com/review.asp?article=3133</a><br />
DOLLHOUSE has thankfully found its way. Let’s hope it wasn’t too late. The ratings have been pretty good and creatively it’s hitting its stride, so let’s hope by finally getting invested in the show, Fox doesn’t pull the plug just as its getting pretty damn good. Boy would that make so many of us REALLY angry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64959</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64959</guid>
		<description>Nick, it DOES matter, since all reports indicate that Remote Free TV is dead and gone next season. The people at FOX can&#039;t possibly be stupid enough to think that they can sell ads at the current C3 rate it is getting if they air it without Remote Free TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, it DOES matter, since all reports indicate that Remote Free TV is dead and gone next season. The people at FOX can&#8217;t possibly be stupid enough to think that they can sell ads at the current C3 rate it is getting if they air it without Remote Free TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-11/#comment-64958</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64958</guid>
		<description>According to Reilly:

&quot;We would like to renew DOLLHOUSE.&quot;

There you have it.  So the 1.3 didn&#039;t matter.  I didn&#039;t think it would.  They want the show to trend up.

Was this week bleeding or NCAA Tourney?  Since they expected a drop last week (and this week) because of the Tourney, there is no way to know for sure.

If it gets a 1.3 or 1.4 this week, it&#039;s dead, whether or not they would like to renew it.  I said before getting a 1.4 is a death sign unless it trends back up.  Nothing has changed.

Robert, I&#039;m not that stupid.  You know it.  C3 matters.  Period.  What is causing the bump is pointless, it gets the bump.  FRINGE gets the same benefit of being a top 20 show in the demos, because of the bump.  DOLLHOUSE gets a bump too.  Yes, yes, REMOTE FREE TV is the cause.  It doesn&#039;t matter.  It gets the bump.  It has higher brand retention.  That is more important than anything else.

Plus I heard the show actually finished with a 1.4 for Friday Night in finals.  Not sure if that is correct, but what I heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Reilly:</p>
<p>&#8220;We would like to renew DOLLHOUSE.&#8221;</p>
<p>There you have it.  So the 1.3 didn&#8217;t matter.  I didn&#8217;t think it would.  They want the show to trend up.</p>
<p>Was this week bleeding or NCAA Tourney?  Since they expected a drop last week (and this week) because of the Tourney, there is no way to know for sure.</p>
<p>If it gets a 1.3 or 1.4 this week, it&#8217;s dead, whether or not they would like to renew it.  I said before getting a 1.4 is a death sign unless it trends back up.  Nothing has changed.</p>
<p>Robert, I&#8217;m not that stupid.  You know it.  C3 matters.  Period.  What is causing the bump is pointless, it gets the bump.  FRINGE gets the same benefit of being a top 20 show in the demos, because of the bump.  DOLLHOUSE gets a bump too.  Yes, yes, REMOTE FREE TV is the cause.  It doesn&#8217;t matter.  It gets the bump.  It has higher brand retention.  That is more important than anything else.</p>
<p>Plus I heard the show actually finished with a 1.4 for Friday Night in finals.  Not sure if that is correct, but what I heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64942</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64942</guid>
		<description>&quot;Alex, how could you say that it stopped. do you have the numbers for next week? Do you have an ability to see next weeks numbers?&quot;

At what point did I speculate on future numbers? My point was very simply (and has been made a couple of times now) TSCC did not grow this week. I know this to be a fact because I have the ability to recognise when numbers are the same. Allow me to demonstrate

This week TSCC scored a 1.3 
Last week TSCC scored a 1.3

Perhaps its just me that sees this but those numbers are in fact the same and since the numbers are the same TSCC did not grow this week. As I said it grew for three weeks and then stopped - this week being the stop since the numbers are the same.

And allow me to pre-empt your reply with this response - total viewers are meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Alex, how could you say that it stopped. do you have the numbers for next week? Do you have an ability to see next weeks numbers?&#8221;</p>
<p>At what point did I speculate on future numbers? My point was very simply (and has been made a couple of times now) TSCC did not grow this week. I know this to be a fact because I have the ability to recognise when numbers are the same. Allow me to demonstrate</p>
<p>This week TSCC scored a 1.3<br />
Last week TSCC scored a 1.3</p>
<p>Perhaps its just me that sees this but those numbers are in fact the same and since the numbers are the same TSCC did not grow this week. As I said it grew for three weeks and then stopped &#8211; this week being the stop since the numbers are the same.</p>
<p>And allow me to pre-empt your reply with this response &#8211; total viewers are meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hagi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64941</link>
		<dc:creator>hagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64941</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hagi,TSCC only got a full season order either because Warner made a deal with Fox or they thought that Sci-Fi Fridays would work. It had nothing to do with the show’s ratings.&quot;

Michael, this is also a speculation, and i do not think that fox accepts such a deal if TSSC&#039;s ratings werent good enough...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hagi,TSCC only got a full season order either because Warner made a deal with Fox or they thought that Sci-Fi Fridays would work. It had nothing to do with the show’s ratings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Michael, this is also a speculation, and i do not think that fox accepts such a deal if TSSC&#8217;s ratings werent good enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hagi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64939</link>
		<dc:creator>hagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64939</guid>
		<description>&quot;No.
It hasn’t grown three weeks running and it hasn’t gone up three weeks running. It grew for three weeks and then stopped. It went up for three weeks and then stopped.&quot;

Alex, how could you say that it stopped. do you have the numbers for next week? Do you have an ability to see next weeks numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No.<br />
It hasn’t grown three weeks running and it hasn’t gone up three weeks running. It grew for three weeks and then stopped. It went up for three weeks and then stopped.&#8221;</p>
<p>Alex, how could you say that it stopped. do you have the numbers for next week? Do you have an ability to see next weeks numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64929</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64929</guid>
		<description>yes G. this is what happens in televisions: boys and girls gets naked avery day in every slot at any hour in american television, so cartoons such as the family guy. if you are not agree with me stay tuned on HBO or Showtime sometime. no no they are not porn channel, but tv by cable. or stay tuned on gossip girl or desperate housewife. is it a shook for you?? do we have to explain you something else: how a girl became woman or how the children born??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes G. this is what happens in televisions: boys and girls gets naked avery day in every slot at any hour in american television, so cartoons such as the family guy. if you are not agree with me stay tuned on HBO or Showtime sometime. no no they are not porn channel, but tv by cable. or stay tuned on gossip girl or desperate housewife. is it a shook for you?? do we have to explain you something else: how a girl became woman or how the children born??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64928</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64928</guid>
		<description>&quot;TSCC has gone up in the ratings 3 weeks in a row&quot;

No.

It hasn&#039;t grown three weeks running and it hasn&#039;t gone up three weeks running. It grew for three weeks and then stopped. It went up for three weeks and then stopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TSCC has gone up in the ratings 3 weeks in a row&#8221;</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>It hasn&#8217;t grown three weeks running and it hasn&#8217;t gone up three weeks running. It grew for three weeks and then stopped. It went up for three weeks and then stopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64922</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64922</guid>
		<description>G, the only problem with women parading around half-naked on TV is that&#039;s all they do - parade around. This is the angle to get 18-34 boys interested and 18-34 girls intrigued with new Pussycat Doll-type &quot; role models. &quot; If you&#039;re jealous of beautiful people, its best not to watch TV or just watch PBS. Eroticism has been part of art since Venus on the Half-Shell ... and Michealangelo&#039;s David ( who&#039;s as naked as a jaybird.) Part of Tv&#039;s problem I think is the shizophrenic attitude towards sex --- hypocritically tease you to sell ad time, but with few exceptions show no actual erotic scenes. ( Obviously not meaning nudity - that will never happen, except occasionally on basic cable with that obscene pixillation or black bars.) And, its funny how protective people arte of Elisha. I remember reading some overcompensating male movie critic lambasting a movie for &quot; exploiting &quot; her because she was wearing spandex shorts or something. Has this actress got some subconscious endangered waif thing going here? I think she&#039;s your standard beautiful twentysomething who can sneer and scowl and roll her eyes ( &quot; Bring it On &quot; for eg ); aside from that, nothing special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G, the only problem with women parading around half-naked on TV is that&#8217;s all they do &#8211; parade around. This is the angle to get 18-34 boys interested and 18-34 girls intrigued with new Pussycat Doll-type &#8221; role models. &#8221; If you&#8217;re jealous of beautiful people, its best not to watch TV or just watch PBS. Eroticism has been part of art since Venus on the Half-Shell &#8230; and Michealangelo&#8217;s David ( who&#8217;s as naked as a jaybird.) Part of Tv&#8217;s problem I think is the shizophrenic attitude towards sex &#8212; hypocritically tease you to sell ad time, but with few exceptions show no actual erotic scenes. ( Obviously not meaning nudity &#8211; that will never happen, except occasionally on basic cable with that obscene pixillation or black bars.) And, its funny how protective people arte of Elisha. I remember reading some overcompensating male movie critic lambasting a movie for &#8221; exploiting &#8221; her because she was wearing spandex shorts or something. Has this actress got some subconscious endangered waif thing going here? I think she&#8217;s your standard beautiful twentysomething who can sneer and scowl and roll her eyes ( &#8221; Bring it On &#8221; for eg ); aside from that, nothing special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TS</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64921</link>
		<dc:creator>TS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64921</guid>
		<description>TSCC has gone up in the ratings 3 weeks in a row, while Dollhouse sunk in the ratings.  Maybe, next week TSCC will surpass the horrible Dollhouse.  TSCC would be beating Dollhouse if the time slots were reversed.  I knew TSCC was doomed when they paired it off with the DOA Dollhouse and sent it off to the wastelands of Friday night.  Dollhouse couldn&#039;t have had a more negative spin on it before it debuted from the media.  Its horrible buzz is why it was moved to Fridays rather than sticking with the original plan.  I&#039;m normally a fan of Joss&#039; work, but this show sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC has gone up in the ratings 3 weeks in a row, while Dollhouse sunk in the ratings.  Maybe, next week TSCC will surpass the horrible Dollhouse.  TSCC would be beating Dollhouse if the time slots were reversed.  I knew TSCC was doomed when they paired it off with the DOA Dollhouse and sent it off to the wastelands of Friday night.  Dollhouse couldn&#8217;t have had a more negative spin on it before it debuted from the media.  Its horrible buzz is why it was moved to Fridays rather than sticking with the original plan.  I&#8217;m normally a fan of Joss&#8217; work, but this show sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64920</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64920</guid>
		<description>Hagi,TSCC only got a full season order either because Warner made a deal with Fox or they thought that Sci-Fi Fridays would work. It had nothing to do with the show&#039;s ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hagi,TSCC only got a full season order either because Warner made a deal with Fox or they thought that Sci-Fi Fridays would work. It had nothing to do with the show&#8217;s ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LCJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64919</link>
		<dc:creator>LCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64919</guid>
		<description>I live in France and I love Dollhouse! I don&#039;t want to so this great serie disapears!
Have not only american fan! Think about us please &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in France and I love Dollhouse! I don&#8217;t want to so this great serie disapears!<br />
Have not only american fan! Think about us please &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/03/28/friday-ratings-ncaa-cruises-to-victory-dollhouse-drops/15375/comment-page-10/#comment-64918</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15375#comment-64918</guid>
		<description>TSCC&#039;s numbers on Monday were hovering around 5 million and a 2.0. Yes, that was horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC&#8217;s numbers on Monday were hovering around 5 million and a 2.0. Yes, that was horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

