<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast On-Demand bigger than iTunes and Big Macs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/01/comcast-on-demand-bigger-than-itunes-and-big-macs/15766/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/01/comcast-on-demand-bigger-than-itunes-and-big-macs/15766/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/01/comcast-on-demand-bigger-than-itunes-and-big-macs/15766/comment-page-1/#comment-66562</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15766#comment-66562</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it a good thing though that they are promoting it? Could that mean they might finally be focused on it?

Could this lead to a world where they focus on getting more content OnDemand all the time? It could be Hulu through the cable box, which is what everyone ultimately wants. It gets around the issues that are causing Boxee users so much pain because it goes through the cablecos and the content owners can put as many ads in as they want because its not being watched on a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it a good thing though that they are promoting it? Could that mean they might finally be focused on it?</p>
<p>Could this lead to a world where they focus on getting more content OnDemand all the time? It could be Hulu through the cable box, which is what everyone ultimately wants. It gets around the issues that are causing Boxee users so much pain because it goes through the cablecos and the content owners can put as many ads in as they want because its not being watched on a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/01/comcast-on-demand-bigger-than-itunes-and-big-macs/15766/comment-page-1/#comment-66412</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15766#comment-66412</guid>
		<description>some of the on-demand offerings (AKA, EVERYTHING from NBC) carry an extra charge, but I&#039;m guessing that&#039;s 11 billion views of stuff that was included in your package plus a couple hundred thousand accidental views of NBC content.

In fairness, the press release was about PBS On Demand.  While it mentioned the 11 Billion (ok, twice, once in its own section) it made no comparisons to iTunes or McDonalds, so I&#039;m not sure that is on the PR people. I haven&#039;t been following the &quot;who said what&quot; at the Cable upfronts and conferences closely, but the only place I saw those references were in the TechCrunch story I cited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of the on-demand offerings (AKA, EVERYTHING from NBC) carry an extra charge, but I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s 11 billion views of stuff that was included in your package plus a couple hundred thousand accidental views of NBC content.</p>
<p>In fairness, the press release was about PBS On Demand.  While it mentioned the 11 Billion (ok, twice, once in its own section) it made no comparisons to iTunes or McDonalds, so I&#8217;m not sure that is on the PR people. I haven&#8217;t been following the &#8220;who said what&#8221; at the Cable upfronts and conferences closely, but the only place I saw those references were in the TechCrunch story I cited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/01/comcast-on-demand-bigger-than-itunes-and-big-macs/15766/comment-page-1/#comment-66410</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=15766#comment-66410</guid>
		<description>Because comparing something that is already included in your cable subscription to things you have to pay for each time is totally a fair comparison! PR people, you&#039;ve done it again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because comparing something that is already included in your cable subscription to things you have to pay for each time is totally a fair comparison! PR people, you&#8217;ve done it again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

