<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollhouse Foreclosure Likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-74748</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-74748</guid>
		<description>Come on! They can&#039;t cancel TSCC without John getting some Metal love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on! They can&#8217;t cancel TSCC without John getting some Metal love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72712</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72712</guid>
		<description>Jay is huffing on the Hulu crackpipe.   Here&#039;s the problem with that:  TSCC doesn&#039;t get even 250,000 additional viewers with Hulu/FOX.com, and FOX makes MUCH LESS money on the online eyeballs than the TV eyeballs.  FOX definitely sees those numbers and knows what they are, and if a couple million were watching TSCC that way, it would probably make a big difference.  But at less than 250K/episode, there&#039;s not a chance of it making any difference to the renewal decision. It&#039;s not fair to think FOX doesn&#039;t factor those numbers, which it definitely sees even if we don&#039;t, into its thinking. 

TSCC&#039;s popularity in terms of Torrent downloads is meaningless to FOX renewing it.  While there are those who ascribe to the theory that Torrent downloads indicate DVD popularity (I don&#039;t have any opinion on that), since Warner Brothers already knows how the season one DVD performed, its DVD sales (which apparently were not great -- not awful, but not great enough for Warner Bros to give the show away to FOX) are probably a better indicator of future DVD sales for WB than torrent downloads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay is huffing on the Hulu crackpipe.   Here&#8217;s the problem with that:  TSCC doesn&#8217;t get even 250,000 additional viewers with Hulu/FOX.com, and FOX makes MUCH LESS money on the online eyeballs than the TV eyeballs.  FOX definitely sees those numbers and knows what they are, and if a couple million were watching TSCC that way, it would probably make a big difference.  But at less than 250K/episode, there&#8217;s not a chance of it making any difference to the renewal decision. It&#8217;s not fair to think FOX doesn&#8217;t factor those numbers, which it definitely sees even if we don&#8217;t, into its thinking. </p>
<p>TSCC&#8217;s popularity in terms of Torrent downloads is meaningless to FOX renewing it.  While there are those who ascribe to the theory that Torrent downloads indicate DVD popularity (I don&#8217;t have any opinion on that), since Warner Brothers already knows how the season one DVD performed, its DVD sales (which apparently were not great &#8212; not awful, but not great enough for Warner Bros to give the show away to FOX) are probably a better indicator of future DVD sales for WB than torrent downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72711</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72711</guid>
		<description>Robert I still like the idea that Fox was throwing around of linking Remote Free to event television, I think that&#039;s probably the best way forward for the concept if they want to keep it. But even then it probably wouldn&#039;t be a big success or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert I still like the idea that Fox was throwing around of linking Remote Free to event television, I think that&#8217;s probably the best way forward for the concept if they want to keep it. But even then it probably wouldn&#8217;t be a big success or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72707</guid>
		<description>The Sarah Connor Chronicles might be getting a raw deal because of its popularity on modern mediums like Torrent sites and Hulu, and not with traditional Nielsen audiences.

The last two episodes were fantastic and while I feel the finale was a satisfying end to the series, I am left wanting more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sarah Connor Chronicles might be getting a raw deal because of its popularity on modern mediums like Torrent sites and Hulu, and not with traditional Nielsen audiences.</p>
<p>The last two episodes were fantastic and while I feel the finale was a satisfying end to the series, I am left wanting more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72093</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72093</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be surprised if Remote Free stuck around, too. While I wish there was a way FOX could continue the experiment somehow, I suspect it won&#039;t  make a comeback until the broader advertising sales market has made a comeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if Remote Free stuck around, too. While I wish there was a way FOX could continue the experiment somehow, I suspect it won&#8217;t  make a comeback until the broader advertising sales market has made a comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72087</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72087</guid>
		<description>er REMOTE FREE TV not replay, my brain is overworked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er REMOTE FREE TV not replay, my brain is overworked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-72086</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-72086</guid>
		<description>Interesting, on Friday FOX Studios released the DVD info for DOLLHOUSE, and it says &quot;The Complete First Season,&quot; vs. &quot;The Complete Series.&quot;

Now sure they could edit it by the time it goes into production, but the current artwork says it&#039;s Season One.  The point is FOX is still considering it enough to release that with that heading.  I hear now the future of DOLLHOUSE is tied to the future of REPLAY TV.  Which is likely why Joss is doubtful of the return of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, on Friday FOX Studios released the DVD info for DOLLHOUSE, and it says &#8220;The Complete First Season,&#8221; vs. &#8220;The Complete Series.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now sure they could edit it by the time it goes into production, but the current artwork says it&#8217;s Season One.  The point is FOX is still considering it enough to release that with that heading.  I hear now the future of DOLLHOUSE is tied to the future of REPLAY TV.  Which is likely why Joss is doubtful of the return of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norzemen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-71674</link>
		<dc:creator>Norzemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-71674</guid>
		<description>Curious of all the shows I DVR and actually watch, TSCC and Dollhouse, they are the ones that look to be canceled. The other shows I DVR, 24, I watch, but it&#039;s ludicrous. And house I used to DVR but ended up deleting it before I watched it.

The other shows I actually watched on TV are long gone. Firefly, Dresden Files and Deadwood. Not to worry though. I&#039;m switching all my entertainment gear to get everything over the net. Ill watch what I want when I want and will purge reality TV from my life FOREVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious of all the shows I DVR and actually watch, TSCC and Dollhouse, they are the ones that look to be canceled. The other shows I DVR, 24, I watch, but it&#8217;s ludicrous. And house I used to DVR but ended up deleting it before I watched it.</p>
<p>The other shows I actually watched on TV are long gone. Firefly, Dresden Files and Deadwood. Not to worry though. I&#8217;m switching all my entertainment gear to get everything over the net. Ill watch what I want when I want and will purge reality TV from my life FOREVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-71435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-71435</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got Dollhouse showing 13 episodes, but I&#039;m sure I remember reading that one of the 13 they ordered was the pilot reshoot and that they were only airing 12? Perhaps I misunderstood.

Anyway, I love TSCC and I hope it has a miracle, but lets be honest... that was an awesome finale cos it was so out there, but I can&#039;t see them holding a show together on the plot line I see laid out for it. So perhaps cancellation will be a blessing in (really heavy) disguise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got Dollhouse showing 13 episodes, but I&#8217;m sure I remember reading that one of the 13 they ordered was the pilot reshoot and that they were only airing 12? Perhaps I misunderstood.</p>
<p>Anyway, I love TSCC and I hope it has a miracle, but lets be honest&#8230; that was an awesome finale cos it was so out there, but I can&#8217;t see them holding a show together on the plot line I see laid out for it. So perhaps cancellation will be a blessing in (really heavy) disguise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-71094</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-71094</guid>
		<description>The cancelation of dollhouse would be a big mistake. I know the show isn&#039;t for everyone but it does have a good story line and depth to it. Its exciting to see Eliza back on screen and Im still not over the cancelation of Tru Calling. Seems like people dont like Eliza or something cause so far she has had no luck in tv shows. 
As for terminator im 50/50 on that show, was great the first season but second season was getting very boring and I think some feel the same way. But i still love to watch it and will keep watching it till it ends. 

If you want to save certain shows maybe start a chain email with the viewing dates n times to everyone you know including grandparents to watch them and try to get the ratings up before the season ends. Maybe then that will bring enough viewers not to cancel that show. Just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cancelation of dollhouse would be a big mistake. I know the show isn&#8217;t for everyone but it does have a good story line and depth to it. Its exciting to see Eliza back on screen and Im still not over the cancelation of Tru Calling. Seems like people dont like Eliza or something cause so far she has had no luck in tv shows.<br />
As for terminator im 50/50 on that show, was great the first season but second season was getting very boring and I think some feel the same way. But i still love to watch it and will keep watching it till it ends. </p>
<p>If you want to save certain shows maybe start a chain email with the viewing dates n times to everyone you know including grandparents to watch them and try to get the ratings up before the season ends. Maybe then that will bring enough viewers not to cancel that show. Just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-70860</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70860</guid>
		<description>If fox decides to terminate the terminator series without at least one more season then I believe that the reputation of fox will be reuined. It will illustrate that fox cares less for its fans and more about a movie promotion. It would be very easy to increase the ratingd just durring the break put the episodes online and on the telivison to give new people a chance to catch up to the new season. 
Also this is the first show in a while that has an indepth story that has an exstensive amount of possiblities which has not been screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If fox decides to terminate the terminator series without at least one more season then I believe that the reputation of fox will be reuined. It will illustrate that fox cares less for its fans and more about a movie promotion. It would be very easy to increase the ratingd just durring the break put the episodes online and on the telivison to give new people a chance to catch up to the new season.<br />
Also this is the first show in a while that has an indepth story that has an exstensive amount of possiblities which has not been screwed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-70762</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70762</guid>
		<description>wheres Osbournes: Reloaded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheres Osbournes: Reloaded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meli</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-70743</link>
		<dc:creator>Meli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70743</guid>
		<description>And Fox is now standing behind Lie to Me, thinking it&#039;s a series that needs a slow build (which it does). I personally think it needs a better time slot--Like 9 PM on Wednesdays instead of 8. Doesn&#039;t it make more sense to put on the family-friendly show like American Idol at 8 and the more adult show on at 9? It worked for House, as I recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Fox is now standing behind Lie to Me, thinking it&#8217;s a series that needs a slow build (which it does). I personally think it needs a better time slot&#8211;Like 9 PM on Wednesdays instead of 8. Doesn&#8217;t it make more sense to put on the family-friendly show like American Idol at 8 and the more adult show on at 9? It worked for House, as I recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-4/#comment-70377</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70377</guid>
		<description>Terminator series finale airs tonight
Dollhouse series finale airs May 8
Prison Break series finale airs May 15
King of the Hill ends TBA

Everything else is safe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator series finale airs tonight<br />
Dollhouse series finale airs May 8<br />
Prison Break series finale airs May 15<br />
King of the Hill ends TBA</p>
<p>Everything else is safe&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie News</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-70320</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70320</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been lurking here for awhile and enjoy the logical, rational assessments by some of the more informed contributors.  My question is this - at a network, say FOX, what is the actual process for picking shows to live or die? 1 person makes the call, a big meeting in a boardroom, cutthroat hallway politics, extortion sex in the parking garage, feed the numbers into the old Atari Schedulemaster and whatever pops out is gospel?  Can anyone comment on who or how will the decision on TSCC and Dollhouse actually get made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been lurking here for awhile and enjoy the logical, rational assessments by some of the more informed contributors.  My question is this &#8211; at a network, say FOX, what is the actual process for picking shows to live or die? 1 person makes the call, a big meeting in a boardroom, cutthroat hallway politics, extortion sex in the parking garage, feed the numbers into the old Atari Schedulemaster and whatever pops out is gospel?  Can anyone comment on who or how will the decision on TSCC and Dollhouse actually get made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXecute99</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-70092</link>
		<dc:creator>eXecute99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-70092</guid>
		<description>Compared to TSCC, Fringe has the advantage of being led in by American Idol and a much larger ad campaign by Fox. Fringe is being treated like a king, I&#039;m guessing because of the success of Lost and JJ Abrams recent successes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to TSCC, Fringe has the advantage of being led in by American Idol and a much larger ad campaign by Fox. Fringe is being treated like a king, I&#8217;m guessing because of the success of Lost and JJ Abrams recent successes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john c</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69808</link>
		<dc:creator>john c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69808</guid>
		<description>this is probably the end of the &quot;Sarah Chronicles&quot; but it could turn into the &quot;John Connor&quot; stories about the war in the future. movies cant have everything</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is probably the end of the &#8220;Sarah Chronicles&#8221; but it could turn into the &#8220;John Connor&#8221; stories about the war in the future. movies cant have everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69782</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69782</guid>
		<description>Harold, you want to know what was missing? Sex. They were a bunch of heifers who were too fat and disgusting to get laid. Then along came a marginally-attractive Aussie who couldn&#039;t really act or carry a show, and OMG panty cream city.  

Religion is a good guess. If the religion is $cientology. Because they were more like a cult. They even had a Jim Jones type ring leader -- &quot;Leeser.&quot; Since like most herds, they were unable to think for themselves, they needed to get verification from &quot;Leeser&quot; first to find out if the sky was blue or the grass was green. They were asking &quot;Leeser&quot; for confirmation on whether the &quot;rumors&quot; were true that &quot;Moonlight&quot; was cancelled... a WEEK after the upfronts. The saddest part? &quot;Leeser&quot; solicited donations from them to &quot;save&quot; the show. They sent &quot;Leeser&quot; lots of money. &quot;Leeser&quot; ran off with it, never to be heard from again. 

Did I say sad? I meant hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold, you want to know what was missing? Sex. They were a bunch of heifers who were too fat and disgusting to get laid. Then along came a marginally-attractive Aussie who couldn&#8217;t really act or carry a show, and OMG panty cream city.  </p>
<p>Religion is a good guess. If the religion is $cientology. Because they were more like a cult. They even had a Jim Jones type ring leader &#8212; &#8220;Leeser.&#8221; Since like most herds, they were unable to think for themselves, they needed to get verification from &#8220;Leeser&#8221; first to find out if the sky was blue or the grass was green. They were asking &#8220;Leeser&#8221; for confirmation on whether the &#8220;rumors&#8221; were true that &#8220;Moonlight&#8221; was cancelled&#8230; a WEEK after the upfronts. The saddest part? &#8220;Leeser&#8221; solicited donations from them to &#8220;save&#8221; the show. They sent &#8220;Leeser&#8221; lots of money. &#8220;Leeser&#8221; ran off with it, never to be heard from again. </p>
<p>Did I say sad? I meant hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69711</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69711</guid>
		<description>come on Dollhouse, i just really hope Dollhouse comes back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come on Dollhouse, i just really hope Dollhouse comes back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69692</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69692</guid>
		<description>It has nothing to do with &quot;bias&quot;. It has to do with ratings.

How many times do Bill and Robert have to point that out to people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has nothing to do with &#8220;bias&#8221;. It has to do with ratings.</p>
<p>How many times do Bill and Robert have to point that out to people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69689</guid>
		<description>&quot;4/8 Update: Lots of comments about how April 10 is the TSCC season finale. People who live a reality based life understand it’s also the series finale.&quot;

How incredibly rude. You just can&#039;t make the change without taking a jab at the show can you?

No wonder this place is a sham. You can&#039;t even keep your bias to yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;4/8 Update: Lots of comments about how April 10 is the TSCC season finale. People who live a reality based life understand it’s also the series finale.&#8221;</p>
<p>How incredibly rude. You just can&#8217;t make the change without taking a jab at the show can you?</p>
<p>No wonder this place is a sham. You can&#8217;t even keep your bias to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvmegafan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69597</link>
		<dc:creator>tvmegafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69597</guid>
		<description>I BELIEVE IN DOLLHOUSE, IF FOX IS SMART THEY&#039;LL GIVE IT ANOTHER SEASON AND PUT IT ON A BETTER NIGHT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I BELIEVE IN DOLLHOUSE, IF FOX IS SMART THEY&#8217;LL GIVE IT ANOTHER SEASON AND PUT IT ON A BETTER NIGHT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69585</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69585</guid>
		<description>Dan, and others, I have added an update re: TSCC season/series finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, and others, I have added an update re: TSCC season/series finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69582</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69582</guid>
		<description>&quot;Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles’ series finale is April 10.&quot;

Wrong, it&#039;s the SEASON finale. You need to change that. You are posting inaccurate information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles’ series finale is April 10.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong, it&#8217;s the SEASON finale. You need to change that. You are posting inaccurate information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69532</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69532</guid>
		<description>Nice one, Bill.

Uhm, Boris, exactly what content did that post of yours have? I THINK it was a slam at fan-fic, but I&#039;m not sure since it was too arty to parse.

I haven&#039;t read almost any TSCC fan-fic (other than the porn ones, of course!) but I suspect some of it is better than most of the scripts the writers turned in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, Bill.</p>
<p>Uhm, Boris, exactly what content did that post of yours have? I THINK it was a slam at fan-fic, but I&#8217;m not sure since it was too arty to parse.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read almost any TSCC fan-fic (other than the porn ones, of course!) but I suspect some of it is better than most of the scripts the writers turned in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69528</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69528</guid>
		<description>Richard Steven Hack says:

&quot;I never said Josh Friedman didn’t do a few good things - casting Summer Glau as a female Terminator was a stroke of genius on his part. Unfortunately he never understood the potential of the character fully.&quot;

I&#039;m sure everyone breathes more easily in the knowledge that the Unblemished Light of Full Understanding is safely protected within the unassailable Basement of FAN-FIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Steven Hack says:</p>
<p>&#8220;I never said Josh Friedman didn’t do a few good things &#8211; casting Summer Glau as a female Terminator was a stroke of genius on his part. Unfortunately he never understood the potential of the character fully.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone breathes more easily in the knowledge that the Unblemished Light of Full Understanding is safely protected within the unassailable Basement of FAN-FIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69494</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69494</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, is your planet&#039;s star yellow, like the one that Earth circles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, is your planet&#8217;s star yellow, like the one that Earth circles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69489</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69489</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you guys really analyzed the numbers you would see that TSCC has not performed worse than say Lie to Me, Bones, or Fringe has. If either one of those shows suffered the same scheduling changes and breaks, they too would be down at 3-4 million level&quot;

I guess you havent noticed that Fringe has been off the air for more then a month and a half twice this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you guys really analyzed the numbers you would see that TSCC has not performed worse than say Lie to Me, Bones, or Fringe has. If either one of those shows suffered the same scheduling changes and breaks, they too would be down at 3-4 million level&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess you havent noticed that Fringe has been off the air for more then a month and a half twice this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69484</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69484</guid>
		<description>Ouch.  I think my brain just exploded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch.  I think my brain just exploded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69479</guid>
		<description>If you guys really analyzed the numbers you would see that TSCC has not performed worse than say Lie to Me, Bones, or Fringe has. If either one of those shows suffered the same scheduling changes and breaks, they too would be down at 3-4 million level. They&#039;re not that far, a million viewers is basically 100 Nielsens, statistically they could one day be on the brink too just by sheer luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys really analyzed the numbers you would see that TSCC has not performed worse than say Lie to Me, Bones, or Fringe has. If either one of those shows suffered the same scheduling changes and breaks, they too would be down at 3-4 million level. They&#8217;re not that far, a million viewers is basically 100 Nielsens, statistically they could one day be on the brink too just by sheer luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69386</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69386</guid>
		<description>Joe, all fall schedules will be announced &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/13/when-will-you-know-if-your-show-is-canceled-or-renewed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;no later than these dates.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, all fall schedules will be announced <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/13/when-will-you-know-if-your-show-is-canceled-or-renewed" rel="nofollow">no later than these dates.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69378</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69378</guid>
		<description>Anyone know when Fox will announce if Bones, Lie To Me and Fringe are coming back next year?

I do take it as a given that House will be back next year because it&#039;s a ratings juggernaut. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know when Fox will announce if Bones, Lie To Me and Fringe are coming back next year?</p>
<p>I do take it as a given that House will be back next year because it&#8217;s a ratings juggernaut. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69329</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69329</guid>
		<description>My mouth is already open and I&#039;ll insert my foot into it later after posting this, but that is awful that ABC did that.

There are a lot of unstable TV viewers out there along the lines of &quot;I won&#039;t believe Dollhouse is canceled until Joss Whedon hold a press conferences saying that it is.&quot;

After &quot;Moonlight,&quot; I despise rabid TV fans. It&#039;s like instead of a religion, they have a TV show. I don&#039;t know what is missing in these people&#039;s lives, but they use a TV show to fill in the space. It&#039;s not just pathetic. It&#039;s also kind of scary. I&#039;m genuinely frightened by those people.

So, ABC providing formal notice for &quot;Life on Mars&quot; is just going to reinforce the expectation among some of these people that their poorly watched TV show deserves some sort of formal death notice and that nothing is really over until that happens. Even if they get it, they immediately begin praying to DirecTV, SciFi, or whatever to provide a biblical resurrection for their show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mouth is already open and I&#8217;ll insert my foot into it later after posting this, but that is awful that ABC did that.</p>
<p>There are a lot of unstable TV viewers out there along the lines of &#8220;I won&#8217;t believe Dollhouse is canceled until Joss Whedon hold a press conferences saying that it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>After &#8220;Moonlight,&#8221; I despise rabid TV fans. It&#8217;s like instead of a religion, they have a TV show. I don&#8217;t know what is missing in these people&#8217;s lives, but they use a TV show to fill in the space. It&#8217;s not just pathetic. It&#8217;s also kind of scary. I&#8217;m genuinely frightened by those people.</p>
<p>So, ABC providing formal notice for &#8220;Life on Mars&#8221; is just going to reinforce the expectation among some of these people that their poorly watched TV show deserves some sort of formal death notice and that nothing is really over until that happens. Even if they get it, they immediately begin praying to DirecTV, SciFi, or whatever to provide a biblical resurrection for their show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69307</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69307</guid>
		<description>Harold, you&#039;re wrong.  Not only did ABC officially announce it, to the press directly, and for the last three episodes even on-air they were promoting it as the SERIES not season finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold, you&#8217;re wrong.  Not only did ABC officially announce it, to the press directly, and for the last three episodes even on-air they were promoting it as the SERIES not season finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69303</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69303</guid>
		<description>Holly says: &quot;Harold, ABC officially announced Life on Mars’ cancellation a few weeks before the finale&quot;

If you were to provide a link to what you claim was an &quot;offical announcement,&quot; I would probably be looking at a HR or Variety article stating that &quot;Life on Mars&quot; had been canceled.

Not exactly an &quot;offical announcement&quot; from ABC, is it?

Keep looking, Holly. If you need a clue on finding a network public cancellation notice, here&#039;s a hint:

Networks distribute them to the media by placing them on pots of gold at the end of rainbows. The leprechauns are employed to read the notices.

Don&#039;t believe me? The leprechaun that reads the NBC cancellation notices lives in Mobile, Alabama - http://cellfish.com/video/99726/Leprechaun-in-Mobile-AL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly says: &#8220;Harold, ABC officially announced Life on Mars’ cancellation a few weeks before the finale&#8221;</p>
<p>If you were to provide a link to what you claim was an &#8220;offical announcement,&#8221; I would probably be looking at a HR or Variety article stating that &#8220;Life on Mars&#8221; had been canceled.</p>
<p>Not exactly an &#8220;offical announcement&#8221; from ABC, is it?</p>
<p>Keep looking, Holly. If you need a clue on finding a network public cancellation notice, here&#8217;s a hint:</p>
<p>Networks distribute them to the media by placing them on pots of gold at the end of rainbows. The leprechauns are employed to read the notices.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? The leprechaun that reads the NBC cancellation notices lives in Mobile, Alabama &#8211; <a href="http://cellfish.com/video/99726/Leprechaun-in-Mobile-AL" rel="nofollow">http://cellfish.com/video/99726/Leprechaun-in-Mobile-AL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69287</guid>
		<description>squiggleslash said:I can’t say the same for Dollhouse. Since the sixth episode it’s been superb, edge of the seat, can’t turn your eyes away

Dollhouse is edge of your seat viewing? come on WORST SHOW EVER MORE LIKE!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>squiggleslash said:I can’t say the same for Dollhouse. Since the sixth episode it’s been superb, edge of the seat, can’t turn your eyes away</p>
<p>Dollhouse is edge of your seat viewing? come on WORST SHOW EVER MORE LIKE!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-3/#comment-69282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69282</guid>
		<description>Fox rescheduling Mental so that all the Dollhouse episodes do air is not the mark of a definitely canceled series.

Then again, I think all this &quot;Dollhouse will return&quot; hinting is just PR designed to protect the cost premium on the remote-free advertising rates for the show. Once the new Fox management settles in, Dollhouse will be quietly dropped at the upfront.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox rescheduling Mental so that all the Dollhouse episodes do air is not the mark of a definitely canceled series.</p>
<p>Then again, I think all this &#8220;Dollhouse will return&#8221; hinting is just PR designed to protect the cost premium on the remote-free advertising rates for the show. Once the new Fox management settles in, Dollhouse will be quietly dropped at the upfront.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69277</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69277</guid>
		<description>Veran,it&#039;s one of the lowest rated shows on the Big 4. It&#039;s done.
Personally, I think that the Ellison/Weaver plot hurt the show. Everyone I know was going &quot;How stupid can Ellison be not to realize Weaver is a Terminator?&quot; And, of course, the first 3 Friday episodes seemed like Friedman was deliberately trying to viewers away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veran,it&#8217;s one of the lowest rated shows on the Big 4. It&#8217;s done.<br />
Personally, I think that the Ellison/Weaver plot hurt the show. Everyone I know was going &#8220;How stupid can Ellison be not to realize Weaver is a Terminator?&#8221; And, of course, the first 3 Friday episodes seemed like Friedman was deliberately trying to viewers away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the TV sage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69270</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the TV sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69270</guid>
		<description>&quot;Call me delusional&quot;

Already done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Call me delusional&#8221;</p>
<p>Already done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69269</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69269</guid>
		<description>The website is named &quot;TV by the NUMBERS&quot; for a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website is named &#8220;TV by the NUMBERS&#8221; for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veran</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69265</link>
		<dc:creator>Veran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69265</guid>
		<description>The problem with you guys is you ONLY look at the numbers. TSCC isn&#039;t like Jericho or Dollhouse or anything else on air at the moment. If there was ever a show that could survive on raw potential, it&#039;s this one. It is not YET cancelled, and there is always a chance for renewal, no matter how crappy the ratings have been lately.

Call me delusional, but I don&#039;t care, because I firmly believe this show has a bright future ahead of it and there is no way WB will file it away forever. And Richard, didn&#039;t Catherine Weaver kill you already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with you guys is you ONLY look at the numbers. TSCC isn&#8217;t like Jericho or Dollhouse or anything else on air at the moment. If there was ever a show that could survive on raw potential, it&#8217;s this one. It is not YET cancelled, and there is always a chance for renewal, no matter how crappy the ratings have been lately.</p>
<p>Call me delusional, but I don&#8217;t care, because I firmly believe this show has a bright future ahead of it and there is no way WB will file it away forever. And Richard, didn&#8217;t Catherine Weaver kill you already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69262</link>
		<dc:creator>abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69262</guid>
		<description>The premise of the show is a plot. People are pimped out by an organization that erases their memory afterward. An FBI agent is on the trail of this organization. One of the people is regaining their identity...

This is a premise that is conceptually related to that of the first season of &quot;Prison Break&quot;: A man breaks into a prison to free his brother.

That is, both premises do not have the advantage of being friendly to stand-alone episodes. If your premise of a show is &quot;crew in a wandering space ship gets in adventures!&quot; or &quot;Teens fight forces of evil!&quot; then you can probably construct many, many self-contained episodes.

Therefore, to retain audiences, a show like Prison Break or Dollhouse should open as strongly as possible and keep that momentum going. Prison Break opened like this. So did Lost.

Dollhouse, with its premise that&#039;s unfriendly to self-contained episodes, decided to open very slowly and mundanely. What we have so far--8 episodes--has touched remarkably little on what&#039;s on the audiences mind: When will Echo wake up/escape?

Worse still, it tried to have self-contained episodes out of Echo&#039;s missions. This person is rented out...it&#039;s bad that they&#039;re rented out...but they will get into an adventure that is exciting to viewers...but then their memory will be erased, so none of it will have mattered. Firstly, the &quot;adventures&quot; of Echo were not exciting. I don&#039;t think the writers could even have made them exciting! They were supposed to be backround material, not any sort of substance.

If you are average Joe just stumbling on something like that, you might finish an episode but not care to return for the next: You&#039;ve received neither the satisfaction of a CSI/Law and Order type of neatly wrapped episode nor have you experienced the sort of exciting serialized storytelling of 24 or Prison Break. 

A fair amount of people tuned in for the premiere of this show...but the series is dropping like a rock. Essentially, Whedon wanted to have the season be a prelude to much meatier stuff, but this is truly like &quot;Lost&quot; opening months before the plane crash and the viewer being made to wait for the Island while he&#039;s forced to sit through the substance of the flashbacks of the first two seasons. Hey, you might be exposed to some interesting storytelling there, but you&#039;d much rather get to the Island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The premise of the show is a plot. People are pimped out by an organization that erases their memory afterward. An FBI agent is on the trail of this organization. One of the people is regaining their identity&#8230;</p>
<p>This is a premise that is conceptually related to that of the first season of &#8220;Prison Break&#8221;: A man breaks into a prison to free his brother.</p>
<p>That is, both premises do not have the advantage of being friendly to stand-alone episodes. If your premise of a show is &#8220;crew in a wandering space ship gets in adventures!&#8221; or &#8220;Teens fight forces of evil!&#8221; then you can probably construct many, many self-contained episodes.</p>
<p>Therefore, to retain audiences, a show like Prison Break or Dollhouse should open as strongly as possible and keep that momentum going. Prison Break opened like this. So did Lost.</p>
<p>Dollhouse, with its premise that&#8217;s unfriendly to self-contained episodes, decided to open very slowly and mundanely. What we have so far&#8211;8 episodes&#8211;has touched remarkably little on what&#8217;s on the audiences mind: When will Echo wake up/escape?</p>
<p>Worse still, it tried to have self-contained episodes out of Echo&#8217;s missions. This person is rented out&#8230;it&#8217;s bad that they&#8217;re rented out&#8230;but they will get into an adventure that is exciting to viewers&#8230;but then their memory will be erased, so none of it will have mattered. Firstly, the &#8220;adventures&#8221; of Echo were not exciting. I don&#8217;t think the writers could even have made them exciting! They were supposed to be backround material, not any sort of substance.</p>
<p>If you are average Joe just stumbling on something like that, you might finish an episode but not care to return for the next: You&#8217;ve received neither the satisfaction of a CSI/Law and Order type of neatly wrapped episode nor have you experienced the sort of exciting serialized storytelling of 24 or Prison Break. </p>
<p>A fair amount of people tuned in for the premiere of this show&#8230;but the series is dropping like a rock. Essentially, Whedon wanted to have the season be a prelude to much meatier stuff, but this is truly like &#8220;Lost&#8221; opening months before the plane crash and the viewer being made to wait for the Island while he&#8217;s forced to sit through the substance of the flashbacks of the first two seasons. Hey, you might be exposed to some interesting storytelling there, but you&#8217;d much rather get to the Island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69233</guid>
		<description>Dennis, it means that the Simpsons recent episode was at or near its season to date 18-49 average, so it&#039;s Index didn&#039;t change. Fox&#039;s season to date average used in the calculations is frozen at its last pre-Idol number for reasons stated in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, it means that the Simpsons recent episode was at or near its season to date 18-49 average, so it&#8217;s Index didn&#8217;t change. Fox&#8217;s season to date average used in the calculations is frozen at its last pre-Idol number for reasons stated in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69219</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69219</guid>
		<description>Just a curiosity, but Bill, why does the Index separate TSCC&#039;s numbers from Fall to Spring?  Is it because it moved days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a curiosity, but Bill, why does the Index separate TSCC&#8217;s numbers from Fall to Spring?  Is it because it moved days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Robot !</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69193</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Robot !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69193</guid>
		<description>TSCC is dead. If SCI-FI wouldnt pick up JERICHO with 6 million viewers, they arent going to pick up TSCC with under 4 million.   Both shows were expensive to make. 

Though I watched TSCC from the beginning, I really didnt fall in love with it and mostly watch it just to see how it ends up.  A better idea for a series would have been John Conner and the early days of him building the resistance after the end of T3 leading into T4.  This would likely only work on SCI-FI channel where its viewers would be more attracted to a show with darker themes like BSG had.  FX also might have worked since FOX own that network.

TSCC had way too much time travel, muddled pointless plots (Jesse and suicide girl) and seemed to be wandering around aimlessly much of the time.  It was a decent show, better than most of the junk on TV these days, but I cant say I will miss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC is dead. If SCI-FI wouldnt pick up JERICHO with 6 million viewers, they arent going to pick up TSCC with under 4 million.   Both shows were expensive to make. </p>
<p>Though I watched TSCC from the beginning, I really didnt fall in love with it and mostly watch it just to see how it ends up.  A better idea for a series would have been John Conner and the early days of him building the resistance after the end of T3 leading into T4.  This would likely only work on SCI-FI channel where its viewers would be more attracted to a show with darker themes like BSG had.  FX also might have worked since FOX own that network.</p>
<p>TSCC had way too much time travel, muddled pointless plots (Jesse and suicide girl) and seemed to be wandering around aimlessly much of the time.  It was a decent show, better than most of the junk on TV these days, but I cant say I will miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69192</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69192</guid>
		<description>Dan - he didn&#039;t completely ignore T3. The John Connor from T:SCC is very obviously the same one as from T3, a whiny, depressed, angst ridden teenager rather than the &quot;kid who could easily be the future leader of humanity&quot; you saw in T2. And some of T3&#039;s background points also made it into T:SCC, noteably the notion Connor gets cancer.

If Josh had completely ignored T3, T:SCC would have been a much better series. T:SCC needed a believable John, a likeable Sarah, and something to keep you watching every week other than &quot;How is this trainwreck going to resolve itself?&quot; I thought it said a lot about how bad things had gotten that the show could do three episodes concentrating on the leading character and (a) most people came away with the opposite view to that intended by the writers and (b) everyone felt it was a mistake and the series lost viewers as a result.

If you can&#039;t actually make episodes about your main character, you&#039;re in trouble.

I&#039;m fairly depressed about T:SCC. It deserves to be canceled, and would even outside of the criteria set by TBTN - eg, it&#039;d deserve to be canceled even if it had House like ratings. It&#039;s just an awful, awful, series, and it started off (after a few duds) showing some very real promise. I think the people involved are very talented, but they can&#039;t put everything together in a way that leaves you with a watchable show.

I can&#039;t say the same for Dollhouse. Since the sixth episode it&#039;s been superb, edge of the seat, can&#039;t turn your eyes away, TV goodness, and I&#039;m disappointed it&#039;s also doing poorly in the ratings. I suspect the week hiatus will probably kill it once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; he didn&#8217;t completely ignore T3. The John Connor from T:SCC is very obviously the same one as from T3, a whiny, depressed, angst ridden teenager rather than the &#8220;kid who could easily be the future leader of humanity&#8221; you saw in T2. And some of T3&#8242;s background points also made it into T:SCC, noteably the notion Connor gets cancer.</p>
<p>If Josh had completely ignored T3, T:SCC would have been a much better series. T:SCC needed a believable John, a likeable Sarah, and something to keep you watching every week other than &#8220;How is this trainwreck going to resolve itself?&#8221; I thought it said a lot about how bad things had gotten that the show could do three episodes concentrating on the leading character and (a) most people came away with the opposite view to that intended by the writers and (b) everyone felt it was a mistake and the series lost viewers as a result.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t actually make episodes about your main character, you&#8217;re in trouble.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly depressed about T:SCC. It deserves to be canceled, and would even outside of the criteria set by TBTN &#8211; eg, it&#8217;d deserve to be canceled even if it had House like ratings. It&#8217;s just an awful, awful, series, and it started off (after a few duds) showing some very real promise. I think the people involved are very talented, but they can&#8217;t put everything together in a way that leaves you with a watchable show.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say the same for Dollhouse. Since the sixth episode it&#8217;s been superb, edge of the seat, can&#8217;t turn your eyes away, TV goodness, and I&#8217;m disappointed it&#8217;s also doing poorly in the ratings. I suspect the week hiatus will probably kill it once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69171</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69171</guid>
		<description>Sorry that I&#039;m bringing this up again, but the numbers of The Simpsons haven&#039;t changed compared to last week. What doesn this mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that I&#8217;m bringing this up again, but the numbers of The Simpsons haven&#8217;t changed compared to last week. What doesn this mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69161</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69161</guid>
		<description>Richard: &quot;Dan, I understand the TSCC - and more importantly, the actual Terminator franchise - concept considerably more than you do. Even the TSCC writers themselves never liked the “Blood Wall”, according to Thomas Dekker himself.&quot;

See, yet another clue as to what you don&#039;t understand... ;)

&gt; &quot;They have a “John Connor Chronicles” - it’s called “Terminator: Salvation”.&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t put too much hope into that movie yet... But would be happy to be proven wrong. Either way, I still rather have a tv-show that can last and build on the original creation of James Cameron.

I was happy that Friedman completely ignored T3 btw...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard: &#8220;Dan, I understand the TSCC &#8211; and more importantly, the actual Terminator franchise &#8211; concept considerably more than you do. Even the TSCC writers themselves never liked the “Blood Wall”, according to Thomas Dekker himself.&#8221;</p>
<p>See, yet another clue as to what you don&#8217;t understand&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;They have a “John Connor Chronicles” &#8211; it’s called “Terminator: Salvation”.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t put too much hope into that movie yet&#8230; But would be happy to be proven wrong. Either way, I still rather have a tv-show that can last and build on the original creation of James Cameron.</p>
<p>I was happy that Friedman completely ignored T3 btw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69160</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69160</guid>
		<description>Richard, watch the show live. You&#039;ll see &quot;This episode brought to you by DirecTV&quot; ads. It definitely means DirecTV has invested money into the show. But it could be they just bought rights to air seasons 1 and 2. Or it could be they&#039;ll co-fund season 3 (yeah, I know, wishful thinking).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, watch the show live. You&#8217;ll see &#8220;This episode brought to you by DirecTV&#8221; ads. It definitely means DirecTV has invested money into the show. But it could be they just bought rights to air seasons 1 and 2. Or it could be they&#8217;ll co-fund season 3 (yeah, I know, wishful thinking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Jones</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221/comment-page-2/#comment-69159</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/07/dollhouse-foreclosure-likely/16221#comment-69159</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t I read somewhere that although Bones hasn&#039;t been renewed officially, the powers that be at Fox have commissioned the first 6 episodes of what would be season 5?

Regarding TSCC, it&#039;s a pity if it does end but at least we got to see Derek on screen, albeit briefly, unlike what happened with Kutner on House this week.

Anyone know what Fringe&#039;s figures were for last night&#039;s awesome comeback episode? If Fringe doesn&#039;t get renewed, I will be shocked because with BG ended and Eureka on hiatus, it&#039;s arguably the best sci-fi-ish show on TV at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t I read somewhere that although Bones hasn&#8217;t been renewed officially, the powers that be at Fox have commissioned the first 6 episodes of what would be season 5?</p>
<p>Regarding TSCC, it&#8217;s a pity if it does end but at least we got to see Derek on screen, albeit briefly, unlike what happened with Kutner on House this week.</p>
<p>Anyone know what Fringe&#8217;s figures were for last night&#8217;s awesome comeback episode? If Fringe doesn&#8217;t get renewed, I will be shocked because with BG ended and Eureka on hiatus, it&#8217;s arguably the best sci-fi-ish show on TV at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

