<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Ratings: American Idol wins again, Unusuals rather usual for ABC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: person .</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-74676</link>
		<dc:creator>person .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-74676</guid>
		<description>... Fox&#039;s lie to me is NOT horrible !
its awesome . 
(8:00 	FOX 	Lie to Me 	2.5/8 	2.0/7 	8.42)
&amp; clearly, many other people agree with me,
if you look at the numbers up there ^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Fox&#8217;s lie to me is NOT horrible !<br />
its awesome .<br />
(8:00 	FOX 	Lie to Me 	2.5/8 	2.0/7 	8.42)<br />
&amp; clearly, many other people agree with me,<br />
if you look at the numbers up there ^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-73265</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-73265</guid>
		<description>I think that there is just an overall drop in American IQ. Seriously...if you honestly consider a show like &quot;Lie to Me,&quot; which I do enjoy, to complex for mainstream tv, then you need to turn off the TV and open a book! I will agree that Fox&#039;s Bones is a bit more technical, but they essentially translate everything Bones says by having Booth ask questions. (I&#039;m a pre-med student, so I understand much of what Bones is saying. My husband is an engineer, so he gets a bit lost, but Booth&#039;s questions are enough for him to catch up.) The same thin can be said for Fox&#039;s House.

Regardless, I think it says a lot that shows like AI get high marks, but shows that actually require the viewer to engage their brains don&#039;t see positive ratings.

On a less analytical note...I don&#039;t like Southland. I want to like it, the premise is good, but it comes off as a little overly scripted to me. It has a few good minutes followed by a few crappy ones. (I&#039;m not to fond of a lot of the character&#039;s personal stories...they just detract from the rest of the plot.)

Hopefully they up the ante and it gets better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there is just an overall drop in American IQ. Seriously&#8230;if you honestly consider a show like &#8220;Lie to Me,&#8221; which I do enjoy, to complex for mainstream tv, then you need to turn off the TV and open a book! I will agree that Fox&#8217;s Bones is a bit more technical, but they essentially translate everything Bones says by having Booth ask questions. (I&#8217;m a pre-med student, so I understand much of what Bones is saying. My husband is an engineer, so he gets a bit lost, but Booth&#8217;s questions are enough for him to catch up.) The same thin can be said for Fox&#8217;s House.</p>
<p>Regardless, I think it says a lot that shows like AI get high marks, but shows that actually require the viewer to engage their brains don&#8217;t see positive ratings.</p>
<p>On a less analytical note&#8230;I don&#8217;t like Southland. I want to like it, the premise is good, but it comes off as a little overly scripted to me. It has a few good minutes followed by a few crappy ones. (I&#8217;m not to fond of a lot of the character&#8217;s personal stories&#8230;they just detract from the rest of the plot.)</p>
<p>Hopefully they up the ante and it gets better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Reality</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-71261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-71261</guid>
		<description>Lost sucks. That episode stunk. Dead is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost sucks. That episode stunk. Dead is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raylie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70672</link>
		<dc:creator>Raylie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70672</guid>
		<description>Ok, I feel as though American Idol will never die. Even when their ratings fluctuate, they always bounce back. I love it though, so it keeps me happy. If anyone else out there is a huge AI fan, you MUST check out the iPhone app they have available. A lite version just came out this week, so if you want to try it out you can do just that for free: phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=310915760</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I feel as though American Idol will never die. Even when their ratings fluctuate, they always bounce back. I love it though, so it keeps me happy. If anyone else out there is a huge AI fan, you MUST check out the iPhone app they have available. A lite version just came out this week, so if you want to try it out you can do just that for free: phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=310915760</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70519</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70519</guid>
		<description>I will always hold dearest to my heart my love for my little Timmy Roth. He is my very favorite and I will always love him so, and I no longer care what anyone else thinks because it must be said. I will always love you, my Timmy. Your dearest, Angus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will always hold dearest to my heart my love for my little Timmy Roth. He is my very favorite and I will always love him so, and I no longer care what anyone else thinks because it must be said. I will always love you, my Timmy. Your dearest, Angus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70383</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70383</guid>
		<description>Lost&#039;s numbers this time around are about what Heroes was getting last fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost&#8217;s numbers this time around are about what Heroes was getting last fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70344</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70344</guid>
		<description>Writing shows vby committee, with what passes for the old standards and practices ( now don&#039;t offend groups x, y and z ) and expecting them to have the mainstream appeal of CSI when it started or the mentalist has got to be something like medieval alchemy. Or do they dance around beheaded chickens? I agree with the post which called out a sour grapes post. Nobody wants new cop shows? The old style sitcom is dead? Reality shows are dead - all these bland platitudes are true until they aren&#039;t. The fact is, writing for the networks has got to be one of the most thankless tasksw imaginable, and cable with its niche audiences with almost prefabricated tastes is makinhg it well-nigh impossible. As for Holly, re ABC&#039;s six hours of dancing shows - how about six hours of Barabara Walters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing shows vby committee, with what passes for the old standards and practices ( now don&#8217;t offend groups x, y and z ) and expecting them to have the mainstream appeal of CSI when it started or the mentalist has got to be something like medieval alchemy. Or do they dance around beheaded chickens? I agree with the post which called out a sour grapes post. Nobody wants new cop shows? The old style sitcom is dead? Reality shows are dead &#8211; all these bland platitudes are true until they aren&#8217;t. The fact is, writing for the networks has got to be one of the most thankless tasksw imaginable, and cable with its niche audiences with almost prefabricated tastes is makinhg it well-nigh impossible. As for Holly, re ABC&#8217;s six hours of dancing shows &#8211; how about six hours of Barabara Walters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calo di ascolti per Lost : Push the button</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70280</link>
		<dc:creator>Calo di ascolti per Lost : Push the button</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70280</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70278</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70278</guid>
		<description>Dan, I&#039;ve loved on &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Life&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; often!  I&#039;m a big fan of the show.  But though it might be a shame that the ratings are so low, it&#039;d be impossible for a reasonable person to fault NBC if it pulls the plug.  The ratings were horrible.  I wish they weren&#039;t, but, they were.  I really enjoyed the season finale though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;ve loved on <i><b>Life</b></i> often!  I&#8217;m a big fan of the show.  But though it might be a shame that the ratings are so low, it&#8217;d be impossible for a reasonable person to fault NBC if it pulls the plug.  The ratings were horrible.  I wish they weren&#8217;t, but, they were.  I really enjoyed the season finale though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70277</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70277</guid>
		<description>Can I get any love for &quot;Life&quot; on here.  Its so underrated; the cast is terrific, and yes I&#039;m talking about the addition of Donal Logue as well, he is not a great actor but he works well with Damian Lewis, who by the way is the best actor on T. V. in my opinion.  Life is the best show on and its a travesty that NBC would cancel them.  The writing is spot on, occasionally the acting leaves something to be desired, but the character Charlie Crews is the best character on T.V. That&#039;s attributed to Damian Lewis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get any love for &#8220;Life&#8221; on here.  Its so underrated; the cast is terrific, and yes I&#8217;m talking about the addition of Donal Logue as well, he is not a great actor but he works well with Damian Lewis, who by the way is the best actor on T. V. in my opinion.  Life is the best show on and its a travesty that NBC would cancel them.  The writing is spot on, occasionally the acting leaves something to be desired, but the character Charlie Crews is the best character on T.V. That&#8217;s attributed to Damian Lewis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Moron</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70271</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Moron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70271</guid>
		<description>Larry, I watch King of the Hill even though I don&#039;t like it because it comes on after the Simpsons.  I also watch How I Met Your Mother even though I hate it because it comes on after The Big Bang Theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, I watch King of the Hill even though I don&#8217;t like it because it comes on after the Simpsons.  I also watch How I Met Your Mother even though I hate it because it comes on after The Big Bang Theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70262</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70262</guid>
		<description>I personally don&#039;t understand why it would be the case that a significant portion of viewship would be linked to what comes on before or after any given show. I hope that the majority of TV viewers aren&#039;t brain dead zombies that can&#039;t deal with the complexities of changing the channel. Granted, I&#039;m not much of a TV watcher but I&#039;ve never missed an episode of Fringe, Life, Terminator, or Life on Mars. As a fan of those shows I know when they are scheduled to air (or were, in the case of LOM) and watch them. I have no idea what shows precede or follow any of those shows I watch. As far as I&#039;m concerned it wouldn&#039;t make any difference whatsoever ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t understand why it would be the case that a significant portion of viewship would be linked to what comes on before or after any given show. I hope that the majority of TV viewers aren&#8217;t brain dead zombies that can&#8217;t deal with the complexities of changing the channel. Granted, I&#8217;m not much of a TV watcher but I&#8217;ve never missed an episode of Fringe, Life, Terminator, or Life on Mars. As a fan of those shows I know when they are scheduled to air (or were, in the case of LOM) and watch them. I have no idea what shows precede or follow any of those shows I watch. As far as I&#8217;m concerned it wouldn&#8217;t make any difference whatsoever &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesus_stick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70261</link>
		<dc:creator>jesus_stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70261</guid>
		<description>lol, its already rated 9.6 there... i dont see the reason you should ask people to rate something. nobody benefits from it, especially not the show.

yes, last nights episode was incredibly great, critics loved it, fans loved it, but unfortunately the quality of the show has very little to do with the nielsen ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, its already rated 9.6 there&#8230; i dont see the reason you should ask people to rate something. nobody benefits from it, especially not the show.</p>
<p>yes, last nights episode was incredibly great, critics loved it, fans loved it, but unfortunately the quality of the show has very little to do with the nielsen ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70258</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70258</guid>
		<description>Yasser, why?  That rating means nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yasser, why?  That rating means nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70255</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70255</guid>
		<description>go and give LOST a 10 out of 10 in the last epoised 
in tv.com !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go and give LOST a 10 out of 10 in the last epoised<br />
in tv.com !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianne</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70227</guid>
		<description>&quot;Life&quot; - that was a great send off.  Real class act all the way through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Life&#8221; &#8211; that was a great send off.  Real class act all the way through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70203</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70203</guid>
		<description>So sorry about Life&#039;s ratings....Damian Lewis is great on the show. Not really sure why NBC was not successful with it; it seems like it has a lot going for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sorry about Life&#8217;s ratings&#8230;.Damian Lewis is great on the show. Not really sure why NBC was not successful with it; it seems like it has a lot going for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-7/#comment-70199</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70199</guid>
		<description>Richard I would imagine that there are some people who only watch television on select nights because of their schedule whether it be work or social commitments. However as internet, on demand and DVR viewing increases that’s obviously going to become less of a problem for fans at least if not the networks. What the percentage of people who can only watch on x night(s) I don’t know but I would imagine someone, somewhere has conducted some kind of study on it. 

As far as Fringe goes I agree with you, I think it would hold up relatively well without Idol assuming it stays a 9. I don’t know if I’d be as confident if it were for some reason to move to 8. I’m not sure if at this stage at least Fringe is a show that pulls large numbers of people to the network off the bat.

And Andrew remember, quality is subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard I would imagine that there are some people who only watch television on select nights because of their schedule whether it be work or social commitments. However as internet, on demand and DVR viewing increases that’s obviously going to become less of a problem for fans at least if not the networks. What the percentage of people who can only watch on x night(s) I don’t know but I would imagine someone, somewhere has conducted some kind of study on it. </p>
<p>As far as Fringe goes I agree with you, I think it would hold up relatively well without Idol assuming it stays a 9. I don’t know if I’d be as confident if it were for some reason to move to 8. I’m not sure if at this stage at least Fringe is a show that pulls large numbers of people to the network off the bat.</p>
<p>And Andrew remember, quality is subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70197</guid>
		<description>I have a theory:

Damon Lindelof is a Nielsen viewer.  It makes sense!  He&#039;s always going on about how he watches Criminal Minds instead of Lost at in their podcasts, and he&#039;s smart enough to know the difference between rerun and original eps.  It explains EVERYTHING!!!!!!111

[sarcasm]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a theory:</p>
<p>Damon Lindelof is a Nielsen viewer.  It makes sense!  He&#8217;s always going on about how he watches Criminal Minds instead of Lost at in their podcasts, and he&#8217;s smart enough to know the difference between rerun and original eps.  It explains EVERYTHING!!!!!!111</p>
<p>[sarcasm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70183</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70183</guid>
		<description>I hate AI and DWTS, god can&#039;t people see these shows are dumb. I can&#039;t take the loss of viewers for good shows because people don&#039;t understand the concept of watching good shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate AI and DWTS, god can&#8217;t people see these shows are dumb. I can&#8217;t take the loss of viewers for good shows because people don&#8217;t understand the concept of watching good shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70174</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70174</guid>
		<description>Good points, Alex. However, I&#039;d be inclined to think Fringe would do reasonably well after ANY lead-in for the reasons I cited - it&#039;s just too unusual not to attract attention, and the characters are so likable people won&#039;t mind watching something that unusual (unless they&#039;re really hide-bound as to their viewing preferences.)

So if Fringe was moved, I suspect some viewers would drop off, but then some other viewers of whatever lead-in the new slot had would start watching. Whether that would result in significant bleeding of viewers I don&#039;t know, but it would seem quite a few shows would be subject to that same phenomena. Only a really, really compelling show is likely to drag ALL its current viewers to some other night and then pick up new ones as well.

I don&#039;t know if anyone has ever statistically studied the effects of the night of the week on viewing habits. Do some people only watch on certain nights REGARDLESS of what&#039;s on? Because of work or whatever? To what degree are people just resistant to shows moving and thus disrupting their settled-on viewing schedule? There&#039;s a lot of questions one could ask and I suspect the answers aren&#039;t around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Alex. However, I&#8217;d be inclined to think Fringe would do reasonably well after ANY lead-in for the reasons I cited &#8211; it&#8217;s just too unusual not to attract attention, and the characters are so likable people won&#8217;t mind watching something that unusual (unless they&#8217;re really hide-bound as to their viewing preferences.)</p>
<p>So if Fringe was moved, I suspect some viewers would drop off, but then some other viewers of whatever lead-in the new slot had would start watching. Whether that would result in significant bleeding of viewers I don&#8217;t know, but it would seem quite a few shows would be subject to that same phenomena. Only a really, really compelling show is likely to drag ALL its current viewers to some other night and then pick up new ones as well.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone has ever statistically studied the effects of the night of the week on viewing habits. Do some people only watch on certain nights REGARDLESS of what&#8217;s on? Because of work or whatever? To what degree are people just resistant to shows moving and thus disrupting their settled-on viewing schedule? There&#8217;s a lot of questions one could ask and I suspect the answers aren&#8217;t around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shem</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70173</link>
		<dc:creator>Shem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70173</guid>
		<description>NBC is in dead last? What a shame for the former #1 network...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC is in dead last? What a shame for the former #1 network&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70172</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70172</guid>
		<description>On another, whilst the numbers aren’t good I thought The Unusuals was ok. 

The problem with the pilot is that they tried to do too much in too short a period of time. Too many characters and too many plots. It doesn’t help that none of the characters really feel natural at this point. Just ‘quirky’ ideas packaged together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another, whilst the numbers aren’t good I thought The Unusuals was ok. </p>
<p>The problem with the pilot is that they tried to do too much in too short a period of time. Too many characters and too many plots. It doesn’t help that none of the characters really feel natural at this point. Just ‘quirky’ ideas packaged together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70168</guid>
		<description>Richard (to a degree) I think Fringe has some Idol inflation just as any show that follows Idol gets some degree of benefit from it. I do however agree with the general idea that its flawed to think people will watch Fringe just because its on after Idol (or House) - they have to be getting some kind of entertainment out of it. 

The question for Fringe is do the people that discovered it and stick with it because its on after Idol like it and enjoy it enough to stick with it if it moves somewhere else? That was the same question Lie To Me faced and apparently the answer there was not really. 

Of course the other question a lot of people seem to love asking is, would Fringe have found an audience without a House/Idol lead-in? And that&#039;s a bit of a backwards question because you can apply that to countless shows that were built on the back of a strong lead-in - House springs to mind as an obvious example. Its a big hit now but would it have done that without Idol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard (to a degree) I think Fringe has some Idol inflation just as any show that follows Idol gets some degree of benefit from it. I do however agree with the general idea that its flawed to think people will watch Fringe just because its on after Idol (or House) &#8211; they have to be getting some kind of entertainment out of it. </p>
<p>The question for Fringe is do the people that discovered it and stick with it because its on after Idol like it and enjoy it enough to stick with it if it moves somewhere else? That was the same question Lie To Me faced and apparently the answer there was not really. </p>
<p>Of course the other question a lot of people seem to love asking is, would Fringe have found an audience without a House/Idol lead-in? And that&#8217;s a bit of a backwards question because you can apply that to countless shows that were built on the back of a strong lead-in &#8211; House springs to mind as an obvious example. Its a big hit now but would it have done that without Idol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70166</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70166</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more like Ouch, viewers, ouch! IMHO the viewers only hurt themselves if the missed Lost last night. Micheal Emerson gave another Emmy winning performance, in his latest Ben centric episode. He was absolutely wonderful, as was Terry O&#039;Quinn and the rest of the cast. Lots of back story to fill in some important answers and some unexpected turns as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more like Ouch, viewers, ouch! IMHO the viewers only hurt themselves if the missed Lost last night. Micheal Emerson gave another Emmy winning performance, in his latest Ben centric episode. He was absolutely wonderful, as was Terry O&#8217;Quinn and the rest of the cast. Lots of back story to fill in some important answers and some unexpected turns as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70161</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70161</guid>
		<description>theFutoncritic.com reports that Lie to Me will get aired in repeats along with House on Mondays this summer starting May 25.

Bones will air in repeats on Thursdays leading into So You Think You can Dance.  Futon Critic suggests (and I agree) that these are positive indicators of renewal for next season for both shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theFutoncritic.com reports that Lie to Me will get aired in repeats along with House on Mondays this summer starting May 25.</p>
<p>Bones will air in repeats on Thursdays leading into So You Think You can Dance.  Futon Critic suggests (and I agree) that these are positive indicators of renewal for next season for both shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kep</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70158</link>
		<dc:creator>kep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70158</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Unusuals flopped becuase we have too many damn cop shows!”

That didn&#039;t bother the 16+ million people who watch The mentalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Unusuals flopped becuase we have too many damn cop shows!”</p>
<p>That didn&#8217;t bother the 16+ million people who watch The mentalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquat1c F1sh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70156</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquat1c F1sh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70156</guid>
		<description>Ouch, Lost. Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, Lost. Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70148</link>
		<dc:creator>Noa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70148</guid>
		<description>I like Lie to Me and I hope it doesn&#039;t go away. And why should it? so it dropped - most 8p shows dropped in the spring. Its numbers right now are similar to Bones&#039; numbers in previous years. Fox kept Bones, why won&#039;t it keep Lie to Me?
As for the Unusuals - ouch. I thought it&#039;s a rather intriguing show. Drama with a touch of comedy and hilarity, since the characters are so out there. Not to mention two (!!) actors from &quot;Oz&quot;. I&#039;ll come back next week for sure (especially since L&amp;O isn&#039;t on).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Lie to Me and I hope it doesn&#8217;t go away. And why should it? so it dropped &#8211; most 8p shows dropped in the spring. Its numbers right now are similar to Bones&#8217; numbers in previous years. Fox kept Bones, why won&#8217;t it keep Lie to Me?<br />
As for the Unusuals &#8211; ouch. I thought it&#8217;s a rather intriguing show. Drama with a touch of comedy and hilarity, since the characters are so out there. Not to mention two (!!) actors from &#8220;Oz&#8221;. I&#8217;ll come back next week for sure (especially since L&amp;O isn&#8217;t on).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePattern</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70144</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70144</guid>
		<description>I agree with Richard Steven Hack. He&#039;s absolutely right. Besides, would people be complaining if Fox gave Dollhouse the same timeslot following Idol? Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Richard Steven Hack. He&#8217;s absolutely right. Besides, would people be complaining if Fox gave Dollhouse the same timeslot following Idol? Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70137</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70137</guid>
		<description>That was the best Lost of this season, and one of the best of any season - how weird that it was so low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the best Lost of this season, and one of the best of any season &#8211; how weird that it was so low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70136</link>
		<dc:creator>lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70136</guid>
		<description>Oh, dear Life.  Life is the best show on tv.  I didn&#039;t even realize it was the season (series finale).  It&#039;s like NBC has given up on everything.  Why do people not watch the best show on tv just because it&#039;s on NBC?  Save Life! Renew Life!  Watch Life episodes on nbc.com.  Smart &amp; quirky.  There&#039;s only a few such shows - House, Bones, &amp; Life.  People want to watch reality drivel these days.  I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, dear Life.  Life is the best show on tv.  I didn&#8217;t even realize it was the season (series finale).  It&#8217;s like NBC has given up on everything.  Why do people not watch the best show on tv just because it&#8217;s on NBC?  Save Life! Renew Life!  Watch Life episodes on nbc.com.  Smart &amp; quirky.  There&#8217;s only a few such shows &#8211; House, Bones, &amp; Life.  People want to watch reality drivel these days.  I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70128</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70128</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why people keep insisting Fringe only survives because of its lead-in.

Since when are people going to sit staring at the tube for another hour of a show they don&#039;t understand just because they watched the lead-in?

Fringe numbers are good because the show is interesting and entertaining, the plots are unusual, and the characters are likable - even the frosty DHS dude is interesting since he looks like an alien himself! 

Anna Torv is completely likable, more so than any other cop on TV - in fact, the only oddity is how she could ever actually be an FBI agent acting that nice to everybody. John Noble is hilarious, Joshua Jackson is likable - and the villains are excellent as well. 

But the real plus are the plots. How many shows have plots like a kid found sealed underground for 80 years? Or a missile comes up from the ground years ago, then returns today - then disappears again after assassins run around trying to grab it and some weird bald dude knows all about it? Or a giant cold virus crawls out a guys mouth after killing him? Or a guy morphs into a monster on an passenger jet? You see this on CSI, Law and Order, even Life? Maybe Chuck?

Some people would watch this stuff simply to say, &quot;Damn, never saw anything like that before!&quot;  Especially if the idiot was just watching American Idol...

That explains Fringe numbers to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why people keep insisting Fringe only survives because of its lead-in.</p>
<p>Since when are people going to sit staring at the tube for another hour of a show they don&#8217;t understand just because they watched the lead-in?</p>
<p>Fringe numbers are good because the show is interesting and entertaining, the plots are unusual, and the characters are likable &#8211; even the frosty DHS dude is interesting since he looks like an alien himself! </p>
<p>Anna Torv is completely likable, more so than any other cop on TV &#8211; in fact, the only oddity is how she could ever actually be an FBI agent acting that nice to everybody. John Noble is hilarious, Joshua Jackson is likable &#8211; and the villains are excellent as well. </p>
<p>But the real plus are the plots. How many shows have plots like a kid found sealed underground for 80 years? Or a missile comes up from the ground years ago, then returns today &#8211; then disappears again after assassins run around trying to grab it and some weird bald dude knows all about it? Or a giant cold virus crawls out a guys mouth after killing him? Or a guy morphs into a monster on an passenger jet? You see this on CSI, Law and Order, even Life? Maybe Chuck?</p>
<p>Some people would watch this stuff simply to say, &#8220;Damn, never saw anything like that before!&#8221;  Especially if the idiot was just watching American Idol&#8230;</p>
<p>That explains Fringe numbers to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70122</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70122</guid>
		<description>Alex I totally agree.  NBC will put these wherever they work on the schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex I totally agree.  NBC will put these wherever they work on the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70117</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70117</guid>
		<description>Lost&#039;s numbers bother me, because it&#039;s such an awesome show, but not too much.

Everyone I know (other than me) either DVR&#039;s Lost or watches full seasons in one go on DVD. 

Many people I know are ardent Lost fans, but refuse to watch only 1 episode at once, and watch the whole season on DVD.

So Lost&#039;s numbers are very skewed I think compared to its actual influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost&#8217;s numbers bother me, because it&#8217;s such an awesome show, but not too much.</p>
<p>Everyone I know (other than me) either DVR&#8217;s Lost or watches full seasons in one go on DVD. </p>
<p>Many people I know are ardent Lost fans, but refuse to watch only 1 episode at once, and watch the whole season on DVD.</p>
<p>So Lost&#8217;s numbers are very skewed I think compared to its actual influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70108</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70108</guid>
		<description>Patrick I’m not sure I buy this SVU/Southland can’t air at 10 theory that’s thrown around a lot. Admittedly I haven’t seen the Southland pilot yet nor am I a regular viewer of SVU but I’m not convinced that in an age where House is on at 8 and CSI delivers fairly gruesome corpses at 9 (repeatedly and from different angles and speeds) I’m not sure how well the argument pans out. Are they going to have to alter some aspects of the shows? Maybe but I don’t think it’s the huge challenge many make it out to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick I’m not sure I buy this SVU/Southland can’t air at 10 theory that’s thrown around a lot. Admittedly I haven’t seen the Southland pilot yet nor am I a regular viewer of SVU but I’m not convinced that in an age where House is on at 8 and CSI delivers fairly gruesome corpses at 9 (repeatedly and from different angles and speeds) I’m not sure how well the argument pans out. Are they going to have to alter some aspects of the shows? Maybe but I don’t think it’s the huge challenge many make it out to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70097</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70097</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s like a zillion online TV guides and program guides on the Internet.  Not to mention schedule information directly available from NBC.com, but NooOoOoOooo...that&#039;s too hard.  They are both new episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s like a zillion online TV guides and program guides on the Internet.  Not to mention schedule information directly available from NBC.com, but NooOoOoOooo&#8230;that&#8217;s too hard.  They are both new episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadiens05</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70096</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadiens05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70096</guid>
		<description>I know the Office episode at 8 pm is a new episode, but is the second office episode on 9 pm also a new episode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the Office episode at 8 pm is a new episode, but is the second office episode on 9 pm also a new episode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Murphy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-6/#comment-70088</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70088</guid>
		<description>&quot;The big question is whether SVU can play an hour earlier. Judging by Tuesday night’s ratings, it wouldn’t matter if 9PM had SVU or the 2nd hour of Biggest Loser: NBC still took fourth place last night.&quot;

I correct myself.  4th in the overalls, but 2nd in the demos.  That is a difference, although SVU&#039;s numbers compared favorably in the demos to BL.  But again, SVU is a 10PM show that has to be put into a 9PM slot somehow, just like Southland if it&#039;s successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The big question is whether SVU can play an hour earlier. Judging by Tuesday night’s ratings, it wouldn’t matter if 9PM had SVU or the 2nd hour of Biggest Loser: NBC still took fourth place last night.&#8221;</p>
<p>I correct myself.  4th in the overalls, but 2nd in the demos.  That is a difference, although SVU&#8217;s numbers compared favorably in the demos to BL.  But again, SVU is a 10PM show that has to be put into a 9PM slot somehow, just like Southland if it&#8217;s successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Murphy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70085</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70085</guid>
		<description>Tom says: 
April 9th, 2009 at 12:40 pm 
@Patrick Murphy:

Yes, yet again, NBC could move Chuck/Heroes to Wednesday…. if they wanted to torpedo the ratings on the expensive SVU by having to move that in return to Monday. And there is no guarantee that Heroes would even benefit going against Lost + sometimes AI, now that all the 18-34 are abandoning Heroes.

Actually, I don&#039;t necessarily advocate keeping Chuck and Heroes together.  I would say move Chuck on its own and pairing with with Legally Mad might be the better move, as I would expect Chuck&#039;s and Legally Mad&#039;s audiences to be in a similar age group (though not necessarily similar in gender).  Chuck and Heroes have slightly different age brackets in their audiences.

The big question is whether SVU can play an hour earlier.  Judging by Tuesday night&#039;s ratings, it wouldn&#039;t matter if 9PM had SVU or the 2nd hour of Biggest Loser:  NBC still took fourth place last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom says:<br />
April 9th, 2009 at 12:40 pm<br />
@Patrick Murphy:</p>
<p>Yes, yet again, NBC could move Chuck/Heroes to Wednesday…. if they wanted to torpedo the ratings on the expensive SVU by having to move that in return to Monday. And there is no guarantee that Heroes would even benefit going against Lost + sometimes AI, now that all the 18-34 are abandoning Heroes.</p>
<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t necessarily advocate keeping Chuck and Heroes together.  I would say move Chuck on its own and pairing with with Legally Mad might be the better move, as I would expect Chuck&#8217;s and Legally Mad&#8217;s audiences to be in a similar age group (though not necessarily similar in gender).  Chuck and Heroes have slightly different age brackets in their audiences.</p>
<p>The big question is whether SVU can play an hour earlier.  Judging by Tuesday night&#8217;s ratings, it wouldn&#8217;t matter if 9PM had SVU or the 2nd hour of Biggest Loser:  NBC still took fourth place last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70081</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70081</guid>
		<description>fine, blame Bud Selig.  I blame him for many, many things :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fine, blame Bud Selig.  I blame him for many, many things <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratings for Wednesday 8th April 2009 &#171; TVStop - Your personal TV Guide</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratings for Wednesday 8th April 2009 &#171; TVStop - Your personal TV Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70079</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:- TVByTheNumbers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:- TVByTheNumbers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70078</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70078</guid>
		<description>Wow at (as you said) ANTM being 0.1 away from being on top of 18-34. And Lie to Me is failing; yay. I&#039;m surprised Lost fell below a 4 too, but it&#039;s still kicking ass and it has a set end date so it doesn&#039;t really matter.
I think RJ might be right; I know that right after I see a show I’m obsessed about, I want to see the responses online and only stick around if the next show is as exciting as that…which it isn’t most of the time.

&quot;ABC is going to become the new NBC, as it only has its few hits and no new ones.&quot; 
Well, aside from its tentpole dramas, it still has Dancing with the Stars and Bachelor(/ette), and perhaps the latter will continue to try to keep up ratings by recycling past losers. 

&quot;Geez, you guys sure are reactionary. 2.5 won the 8:00 slot tonight. What does that tell you? Answer: Nobody was watching TV!&quot;
Well, adding up the 8 o clock shares = about 30. Meaning everyone was watching cable, not nothing.

Hmm, people seem pretty psyched about possibilities for the two new shows tonight. No mid-season show has made a hit, right? Well, unless you count the now-2.5 LTM. Oh, reading downthread, I forgot that the Poehler show is premiering too. Oh. Exciting.
Although I don’t think any steadily 4.0+ hits have been made in the last four seasons (I’m not counting shows that only get these ratings when directly after, say, Idol.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow at (as you said) ANTM being 0.1 away from being on top of 18-34. And Lie to Me is failing; yay. I&#8217;m surprised Lost fell below a 4 too, but it&#8217;s still kicking ass and it has a set end date so it doesn&#8217;t really matter.<br />
I think RJ might be right; I know that right after I see a show I’m obsessed about, I want to see the responses online and only stick around if the next show is as exciting as that…which it isn’t most of the time.</p>
<p>&#8220;ABC is going to become the new NBC, as it only has its few hits and no new ones.&#8221;<br />
Well, aside from its tentpole dramas, it still has Dancing with the Stars and Bachelor(/ette), and perhaps the latter will continue to try to keep up ratings by recycling past losers. </p>
<p>&#8220;Geez, you guys sure are reactionary. 2.5 won the 8:00 slot tonight. What does that tell you? Answer: Nobody was watching TV!&#8221;<br />
Well, adding up the 8 o clock shares = about 30. Meaning everyone was watching cable, not nothing.</p>
<p>Hmm, people seem pretty psyched about possibilities for the two new shows tonight. No mid-season show has made a hit, right? Well, unless you count the now-2.5 LTM. Oh, reading downthread, I forgot that the Poehler show is premiering too. Oh. Exciting.<br />
Although I don’t think any steadily 4.0+ hits have been made in the last four seasons (I’m not counting shows that only get these ratings when directly after, say, Idol.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70077</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70077</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems more likely to me that Passover (and at least versus last week,) a new Criminal Minds explain the *additional* losses.&quot;

Pesach strikes me as a very odd candidate to advance over, say, the first week of the new baseball season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems more likely to me that Passover (and at least versus last week,) a new Criminal Minds explain the *additional* losses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pesach strikes me as a very odd candidate to advance over, say, the first week of the new baseball season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70073</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70073</guid>
		<description>Life on Mars premiered with 11.3 million viewers. So I wouldn&#039;t call 6.84 million for a premier episode of The Unusuals an impovement. After the curiosity factor wears off, it&#039;s only downhill from there.  I sure wasn&#039;t planning to watch it.  After the cancellation of LOM, I&#039;ve gone back to ignoring ABC as &quot;usual&quot;.    If I watch any new cop show, it will be Southland which I&#039;ve already seen the premiere of and it should be a hit except for the fact that no one watches NBC anymore either.

And too bad about Life.  Another great show bites the dust, leaving more free time for me.  The finale was especially good and they did seem to wrap everything up in case it has to be the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life on Mars premiered with 11.3 million viewers. So I wouldn&#8217;t call 6.84 million for a premier episode of The Unusuals an impovement. After the curiosity factor wears off, it&#8217;s only downhill from there.  I sure wasn&#8217;t planning to watch it.  After the cancellation of LOM, I&#8217;ve gone back to ignoring ABC as &#8220;usual&#8221;.    If I watch any new cop show, it will be Southland which I&#8217;ve already seen the premiere of and it should be a hit except for the fact that no one watches NBC anymore either.</p>
<p>And too bad about Life.  Another great show bites the dust, leaving more free time for me.  The finale was especially good and they did seem to wrap everything up in case it has to be the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70072</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70072</guid>
		<description>@Patrick Murphy:

Yes, yet again, NBC could move Chuck/Heroes to Wednesday.... if they wanted to torpedo the ratings on the expensive SVU by having to move that in return to Monday. And there is no guarantee that Heroes would even benefit going against Lost + sometimes AI, now that all the 18-34 are abandoning Heroes.

So your master plan is to ruin the ratings on one show NBC produces (SVU), probably drag down the ratings on another show NBC produces (Heroes), all to raise the chances of some other show NBC doesn&#039;t produce (Chuck). You do realize that the networks actually prefer to be profitable, right?

@Andrea: &quot;Lie To Me is not in trouble and will be picked up for a full season next year&quot;

Why? Why would Fox commit to that now? Take a look at Fox&#039;s current spring M-R schedule: what (aside from possibly LTM) won&#039;t be back next spring? Why would Fox commit to a whole season of a 2.5 rating show when they can order 13 episodes for Fall, see if any of their other new Fall shows are a hit (they will be scheduling at least 2 new hour longs, possibly 3 or more if they don&#039;t go with a &#039;Til Death/Earl-other comedy hour to start out with) and go from there?

Simply put, Fox&#039;s 2010 M-R Spring lineup is already set except for one slot: LTM&#039;s. Why commit to the weakest link now? (Yes, House could be moved from Monday to some other night, like Wednesday next year. But it will still air sometime between M-R in the spring.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Murphy:</p>
<p>Yes, yet again, NBC could move Chuck/Heroes to Wednesday&#8230;. if they wanted to torpedo the ratings on the expensive SVU by having to move that in return to Monday. And there is no guarantee that Heroes would even benefit going against Lost + sometimes AI, now that all the 18-34 are abandoning Heroes.</p>
<p>So your master plan is to ruin the ratings on one show NBC produces (SVU), probably drag down the ratings on another show NBC produces (Heroes), all to raise the chances of some other show NBC doesn&#8217;t produce (Chuck). You do realize that the networks actually prefer to be profitable, right?</p>
<p>@Andrea: &#8220;Lie To Me is not in trouble and will be picked up for a full season next year&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Why would Fox commit to that now? Take a look at Fox&#8217;s current spring M-R schedule: what (aside from possibly LTM) won&#8217;t be back next spring? Why would Fox commit to a whole season of a 2.5 rating show when they can order 13 episodes for Fall, see if any of their other new Fall shows are a hit (they will be scheduling at least 2 new hour longs, possibly 3 or more if they don&#8217;t go with a &#8216;Til Death/Earl-other comedy hour to start out with) and go from there?</p>
<p>Simply put, Fox&#8217;s 2010 M-R Spring lineup is already set except for one slot: LTM&#8217;s. Why commit to the weakest link now? (Yes, House could be moved from Monday to some other night, like Wednesday next year. But it will still air sometime between M-R in the spring.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70063</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70063</guid>
		<description>I’m not sure if I’m convinced by the idea that Fox were trying to protect Lie to Me from Lost when they switched it to 8. I’d be more inclined to believe that if Lie To Me were sinking at 9 but from what I remember whilst Lost had a clear margin it was still competitive with Criminal Minds and holding onto a decent sized audience. Of course if Fox did move Lie to Me to protect it from Lost its backfired.

Whatever the reason for the move was though I think the time might have come to switch them back because for whatever reason Lie to Me is sinking at 8, which is a shame because its really growing on me. On a related note I like the idea of a House/Lie To Me combo next year - I think that’s a much better fit than House/Fringe or House/24. Of course I’m not convinced we’re going to see House/Lie To Me next year for various reasons but I like it none the less. Although as it stands what Fox does with House next year (in terms of what it leads into) is one of the more interesting things about their schedule. I’m also wondering if they’ll keep it Monday’s at 8 where its now beating Dancing with the Stars head-to-head. 

As far as the Lost drop goes who knows what drops that. I suspect Criminal Minds being an original episode probably played a small part in it plus the fact that everything was seemingly down last night. It’ll be interesting to see if it’ll rebound next week or not or whether it stays below a 4. It’s probably worth pointing out that Lost has lost more than a point from its demo vs. where it was at the start of March. That’s a worrying drop for ABC if the numbers don’t go back up.

On the plus side Lost dropping means that for the retionistas of this world The Unusuals didn’t do as badly as it could have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure if I’m convinced by the idea that Fox were trying to protect Lie to Me from Lost when they switched it to 8. I’d be more inclined to believe that if Lie To Me were sinking at 9 but from what I remember whilst Lost had a clear margin it was still competitive with Criminal Minds and holding onto a decent sized audience. Of course if Fox did move Lie to Me to protect it from Lost its backfired.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason for the move was though I think the time might have come to switch them back because for whatever reason Lie to Me is sinking at 8, which is a shame because its really growing on me. On a related note I like the idea of a House/Lie To Me combo next year &#8211; I think that’s a much better fit than House/Fringe or House/24. Of course I’m not convinced we’re going to see House/Lie To Me next year for various reasons but I like it none the less. Although as it stands what Fox does with House next year (in terms of what it leads into) is one of the more interesting things about their schedule. I’m also wondering if they’ll keep it Monday’s at 8 where its now beating Dancing with the Stars head-to-head. </p>
<p>As far as the Lost drop goes who knows what drops that. I suspect Criminal Minds being an original episode probably played a small part in it plus the fact that everything was seemingly down last night. It’ll be interesting to see if it’ll rebound next week or not or whether it stays below a 4. It’s probably worth pointing out that Lost has lost more than a point from its demo vs. where it was at the start of March. That’s a worrying drop for ABC if the numbers don’t go back up.</p>
<p>On the plus side Lost dropping means that for the retionistas of this world The Unusuals didn’t do as badly as it could have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porky</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70051</link>
		<dc:creator>porky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70051</guid>
		<description>Why do people really care about Lost ratings?

It&#039;s already going to end next year and for the fans that&#039;s all that should matter. Ratings will probably pickup near the finale next year because I&#039;m sure a lot of prior fans will want to see how it comes to an end. Last nights episode was great by the way.

Lie to Me is probably safe unless if just starts to freefall. It could, but I think FOX is going to bring it back and pair it with House in the fall. It&#039;s ratings could boost then and it might come back for a full second season. 

Remember Fox gave TSCC a full second season when ratings were pretty poor. I could see them pulling something like that with Lie to Me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people really care about Lost ratings?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s already going to end next year and for the fans that&#8217;s all that should matter. Ratings will probably pickup near the finale next year because I&#8217;m sure a lot of prior fans will want to see how it comes to an end. Last nights episode was great by the way.</p>
<p>Lie to Me is probably safe unless if just starts to freefall. It could, but I think FOX is going to bring it back and pair it with House in the fall. It&#8217;s ratings could boost then and it might come back for a full second season. </p>
<p>Remember Fox gave TSCC a full second season when ratings were pretty poor. I could see them pulling something like that with Lie to Me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70042</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70042</guid>
		<description>alan: &quot;... i started watching this season after missing a couple of seasons but it is just about unwatchable ...&quot;

There&#039;s your problem right there, alan, you just can&#039;t get away doing that with LOST. It&#039;s no wonder you found it &quot;unwatchable&quot; if you missed several seasons. How can you expect to properly follow a story when you&#039;ve missed a huge chunk of it? And there&#039;s really no excuse for missing any of it, as you can stream all the episodes for free on ABC.com, or of course rent the DVDs (or Blu-rays soon) to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alan: &#8220;&#8230; i started watching this season after missing a couple of seasons but it is just about unwatchable &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s your problem right there, alan, you just can&#8217;t get away doing that with LOST. It&#8217;s no wonder you found it &#8220;unwatchable&#8221; if you missed several seasons. How can you expect to properly follow a story when you&#8217;ve missed a huge chunk of it? And there&#8217;s really no excuse for missing any of it, as you can stream all the episodes for free on ABC.com, or of course rent the DVDs (or Blu-rays soon) to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Murphy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357/comment-page-5/#comment-70039</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/09/wednesday-ratings-american-idol-wins-again-unusuals-rather-usual-for-abc/16357#comment-70039</guid>
		<description>Robert Seidman says: 
April 9th, 2009 at 11:36 am 
Patrick, you could say that but you’d be at least partially wrong. LOST has gone head-to-head with American Idol several times already this season, last night was Lost’s worst performance (and it wasn’t Idol’s best). This is not to say that LOST doesn’t lose more viewers airing against Idol than Lie To Me, the history shows that is true. But it doesn’t explain why last night was worse than last week. It seems more likely to me that Passover (and at least versus last week,) a new Criminal Minds explain the *additional* losses.


No, you&#039;re right.  Actually, I wasn&#039;t really talking about last night vs. last week, since I didn&#039;t really know last week&#039;s numbers until you just told me.  I was just thinking that Lie to Me competes better in the 8PM hour than the 9PM hour.  I was looking at it from Fox&#039;s angle, since I doubt ABC plans to move Lost up to 8PM.  (although I have seen stranger things happen)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Seidman says:<br />
April 9th, 2009 at 11:36 am<br />
Patrick, you could say that but you’d be at least partially wrong. LOST has gone head-to-head with American Idol several times already this season, last night was Lost’s worst performance (and it wasn’t Idol’s best). This is not to say that LOST doesn’t lose more viewers airing against Idol than Lie To Me, the history shows that is true. But it doesn’t explain why last night was worse than last week. It seems more likely to me that Passover (and at least versus last week,) a new Criminal Minds explain the *additional* losses.</p>
<p>No, you&#8217;re right.  Actually, I wasn&#8217;t really talking about last night vs. last week, since I didn&#8217;t really know last week&#8217;s numbers until you just told me.  I was just thinking that Lie to Me competes better in the 8PM hour than the 9PM hour.  I was looking at it from Fox&#8217;s angle, since I doubt ABC plans to move Lost up to 8PM.  (although I have seen stranger things happen)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

