<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sit Down, Shut Up; Slow Start, Slim Chance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-79357</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-79357</guid>
		<description>Pete, FOX would never ever ever in a million years make that deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, FOX would never ever ever in a million years make that deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-79354</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-79354</guid>
		<description>Til Death, will make a trumendance amount in syndication, local nets want sitcom reruns to strip Brad Garret was on Raymon, Raymon is a hit....Their will be very few new sitcoms entering the market in 2 seasons, the only ones I can think of would be Old Christine, possibly 30 Rock if 80 episodes is the new 100.  I am in dissbelief Sony didn&#039;t make the deal that Til Death could only air after American Idle, and give Fox an even cheaper show, that way when it enters syndication it would have even more buffed up numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Til Death, will make a trumendance amount in syndication, local nets want sitcom reruns to strip Brad Garret was on Raymon, Raymon is a hit&#8230;.Their will be very few new sitcoms entering the market in 2 seasons, the only ones I can think of would be Old Christine, possibly 30 Rock if 80 episodes is the new 100.  I am in dissbelief Sony didn&#8217;t make the deal that Til Death could only air after American Idle, and give Fox an even cheaper show, that way when it enters syndication it would have even more buffed up numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-78744</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-78744</guid>
		<description>Honestly. I really think its crap. These shows don&#039;t really get a chance. Alot of people who watch them are not in the United States. Soldiers all over the world enjoy some of the shows and would like another season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly. I really think its crap. These shows don&#8217;t really get a chance. Alot of people who watch them are not in the United States. Soldiers all over the world enjoy some of the shows and would like another season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonW</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-78515</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-78515</guid>
		<description>Bwap! Did my interpretive dance sell it? Glad to see American Dad will be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwap! Did my interpretive dance sell it? Glad to see American Dad will be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wess</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-77801</link>
		<dc:creator>Wess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-77801</guid>
		<description>The shouting for T:TSCC is over? Not by a long shot.

T : T S C C !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shouting for T:TSCC is over? Not by a long shot.</p>
<p>T : T S C C !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-77652</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-77652</guid>
		<description>I like TSCC it would have been nice to see them tie it up with the current film but they didn&#039;t oh well what can you do.  I can understand the point about TSCC&#039;s demo number (Regardless it won&#039;t save the show.) as the laws of rounding state 0-4 round down and 5-9 round up so 1.252 would round to 1.3.  What can I say I&#039;m a stickler for numbers and this is a numbers site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like TSCC it would have been nice to see them tie it up with the current film but they didn&#8217;t oh well what can you do.  I can understand the point about TSCC&#8217;s demo number (Regardless it won&#8217;t save the show.) as the laws of rounding state 0-4 round down and 5-9 round up so 1.252 would round to 1.3.  What can I say I&#8217;m a stickler for numbers and this is a numbers site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-77100</link>
		<dc:creator>Packy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-77100</guid>
		<description>As long as Bones comes back, all will be right in my world.

I read somewhere that Fox ordered 6 episodes of Bones for next season...is it normal for a network to order so few episodes, or is it possible that the source is bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Bones comes back, all will be right in my world.</p>
<p>I read somewhere that Fox ordered 6 episodes of Bones for next season&#8230;is it normal for a network to order so few episodes, or is it possible that the source is bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billtoo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-77062</link>
		<dc:creator>billtoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-77062</guid>
		<description>I am one of those folks who does watch just about any series with a sci/fi fantasy premise. The original &quot;V&quot; is a rare example of one that I just could not get into at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of those folks who does watch just about any series with a sci/fi fantasy premise. The original &#8220;V&#8221; is a rare example of one that I just could not get into at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76787</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse could have done better if it got more advertising and consistent time slot. I only found out about it about two months ago. same with a lot of other people. Its a great show, and I think it will get picked up by a more fitting network. i think it would be best off in a more youthful network. Maybe CW. That would be a good fit. I never watch Fox.I always associate it with fat cartoon dads. I am amzed fringe did well, but then they advertised the heck out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse could have done better if it got more advertising and consistent time slot. I only found out about it about two months ago. same with a lot of other people. Its a great show, and I think it will get picked up by a more fitting network. i think it would be best off in a more youthful network. Maybe CW. That would be a good fit. I never watch Fox.I always associate it with fat cartoon dads. I am amzed fringe did well, but then they advertised the heck out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76785</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76785</guid>
		<description>Wait..how are Adelle and Topher likeable? They take away peoples memories and force them to do things with brain washing? that didn&#039;t clue you in that they were bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait..how are Adelle and Topher likeable? They take away peoples memories and force them to do things with brain washing? that didn&#8217;t clue you in that they were bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76784</guid>
		<description>Michael the dolls are being raped and the whole show is about how bad it is to use people and rob them of humanity. just because the bad guys aren&#039;t drooling evil slime doesn&#039;t mean the show is about &quot;sympathetic rapists&quot;. I guess you just need things to be more obvious, but the show is very clear on them being bad guys. Its not just Sierra thats being raped. all the dolls are just by being dolls. Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael the dolls are being raped and the whole show is about how bad it is to use people and rob them of humanity. just because the bad guys aren&#8217;t drooling evil slime doesn&#8217;t mean the show is about &#8220;sympathetic rapists&#8221;. I guess you just need things to be more obvious, but the show is very clear on them being bad guys. Its not just Sierra thats being raped. all the dolls are just by being dolls. Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76783</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76783</guid>
		<description>Ooh. Kimmie&#039;s comment says all there needs to be said for House fans. Yeah, Kimmie, I sure hope they don&#039;t cancel their number one show. Well, maybe if she watches House and thinks people really drink on the job like that its understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh. Kimmie&#8217;s comment says all there needs to be said for House fans. Yeah, Kimmie, I sure hope they don&#8217;t cancel their number one show. Well, maybe if she watches House and thinks people really drink on the job like that its understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76782</guid>
		<description>I think V had a terrific premise. Thats the thing, if you are doing diplomacy, you don&#039;t know if &quot;they&quot; are nice or not. Why the &quot;duh&quot;? How would one quantify an unquantifiable thing? Besides they were not all rotters, and even if earthlings knew the V aliens were bad from the start they could have over run us anyways, so diplomacy was necessary. It was a very cool, and deep show. And the characters were a lot better then Battlestar. of course I didn&#039;t like the new battlestar anyhow. And the stupid angel thing just proved it. Now a remake of V I could get into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think V had a terrific premise. Thats the thing, if you are doing diplomacy, you don&#8217;t know if &#8220;they&#8221; are nice or not. Why the &#8220;duh&#8221;? How would one quantify an unquantifiable thing? Besides they were not all rotters, and even if earthlings knew the V aliens were bad from the start they could have over run us anyways, so diplomacy was necessary. It was a very cool, and deep show. And the characters were a lot better then Battlestar. of course I didn&#8217;t like the new battlestar anyhow. And the stupid angel thing just proved it. Now a remake of V I could get into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76780</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76780</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t American dad, Family Guy and the Simpsons the same show/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t American dad, Family Guy and the Simpsons the same show/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76779</guid>
		<description>Ok...but Terminator is so badly written its hard to watch. the plots barely make any sense at all. Its just all about proving how ruthless that ballerina can be. Thats just silly. Something like that is by no means a guaranteed hit. Not that many people will just watch anything scifi. Except Star treck. For some reason if you dress up a bunch of people in tight black and green jump suits and put that little v pin on them you have fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230;but Terminator is so badly written its hard to watch. the plots barely make any sense at all. Its just all about proving how ruthless that ballerina can be. Thats just silly. Something like that is by no means a guaranteed hit. Not that many people will just watch anything scifi. Except Star treck. For some reason if you dress up a bunch of people in tight black and green jump suits and put that little v pin on them you have fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-3/#comment-76777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76777</guid>
		<description>I like Dollhouse and Fringe. i like Dollhouse a lot more. But its so unusual, I can see why people don&#039;t know what to make of it. Still, I think if it had a while it might get there. I guess most people relly just want to watch cop shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Dollhouse and Fringe. i like Dollhouse a lot more. But its so unusual, I can see why people don&#8217;t know what to make of it. Still, I think if it had a while it might get there. I guess most people relly just want to watch cop shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76569</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76569</guid>
		<description>Zac: &quot;after a season finale like that there are lot of unanswered numbers&quot; (I assume you mean questions).

Yeah - like how Friedman got hired in the first place with zero sci-fi street cred. Like how you can take a guaranteed hit like Terminator and get it canceled within a season and a half. You have any idea how embarrassed Warner Brothers must be by this fiasco?

Right now my opinion of Josh Friedman is on a par with the guy who got killed in the first episode of season two by Weaver: &quot;Man, that bitch pisses me off!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac: &#8220;after a season finale like that there are lot of unanswered numbers&#8221; (I assume you mean questions).</p>
<p>Yeah &#8211; like how Friedman got hired in the first place with zero sci-fi street cred. Like how you can take a guaranteed hit like Terminator and get it canceled within a season and a half. You have any idea how embarrassed Warner Brothers must be by this fiasco?</p>
<p>Right now my opinion of Josh Friedman is on a par with the guy who got killed in the first episode of season two by Weaver: &#8220;Man, that bitch pisses me off!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76148</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76148</guid>
		<description>Ive already stated my projected sunday schedule and it has been confirmed until October that Hell&#039;s Kitchen will be airing Tuesdays at 8 and the new reality series More to Love will be airing at 9 on Tuesdays atleast until september.

Thursdays could have Bones at 8 and Fringe at 9. Both series are similiar to one another so the combo could work well.

Mondays could have House at 8 and Lie to Me at 9. Both of these series are also similiar to each other and could make mondays better than last season.

Fridays. FOX could have Fifth Grader and Lyrics combo again, that worked out alright for them.

Not sure about wednesdays though. In terms of new series, FOX could opt to wait until Hell&#039;s is over in November and premiere something there tuesdays. 

What does everyone think so far?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive already stated my projected sunday schedule and it has been confirmed until October that Hell&#8217;s Kitchen will be airing Tuesdays at 8 and the new reality series More to Love will be airing at 9 on Tuesdays atleast until september.</p>
<p>Thursdays could have Bones at 8 and Fringe at 9. Both series are similiar to one another so the combo could work well.</p>
<p>Mondays could have House at 8 and Lie to Me at 9. Both of these series are also similiar to each other and could make mondays better than last season.</p>
<p>Fridays. FOX could have Fifth Grader and Lyrics combo again, that worked out alright for them.</p>
<p>Not sure about wednesdays though. In terms of new series, FOX could opt to wait until Hell&#8217;s is over in November and premiere something there tuesdays. </p>
<p>What does everyone think so far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76140</guid>
		<description>No matter how you put it Terminator is gone, Dollhouse is waiting to be gone, Prison Break is ending next month and King of the Hill is ending sooon. American Dad, The Simpsons, Family Guy, House, Bones, Fringe, 24, Lie to Me, and Til Death will all be back. Despite my earlier schedule its possible that Sit Down, Shut Up will basically have their episodes burned off in the summer, though if I were FOX I would just keep it so 7:00 and 7:30 wouldnt have to be filled with repeats in the fall. If the series were The Winner or Unhitched it would be axed, but since the series is animated this could be different for Sit Down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how you put it Terminator is gone, Dollhouse is waiting to be gone, Prison Break is ending next month and King of the Hill is ending sooon. American Dad, The Simpsons, Family Guy, House, Bones, Fringe, 24, Lie to Me, and Til Death will all be back. Despite my earlier schedule its possible that Sit Down, Shut Up will basically have their episodes burned off in the summer, though if I were FOX I would just keep it so 7:00 and 7:30 wouldnt have to be filled with repeats in the fall. If the series were The Winner or Unhitched it would be axed, but since the series is animated this could be different for Sit Down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76110</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76110</guid>
		<description>Til Death will get around 80 episodes after its fourth season which isn&#039;t 100 but good enough for any off network sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Til Death will get around 80 episodes after its fourth season which isn&#8217;t 100 but good enough for any off network sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76106</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76106</guid>
		<description>House likely won&#039;t be canceled until Hugh Laurie finally gets bored with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House likely won&#8217;t be canceled until Hugh Laurie finally gets bored with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76103</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76103</guid>
		<description>Yes, Kimmie, FOX is going to cancel the highest rated scripted show they have.... You might want to actually read the posts before you comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Kimmie, FOX is going to cancel the highest rated scripted show they have&#8230;. You might want to actually read the posts before you comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76100</link>
		<dc:creator>kimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76100</guid>
		<description>I really hope that House gets renewed for another season. I really like House, its one of my favorite shows. And it will still do good if it gets renewed. Anyways, hope they renew it for another season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that House gets renewed for another season. I really like House, its one of my favorite shows. And it will still do good if it gets renewed. Anyways, hope they renew it for another season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zac</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-76073</link>
		<dc:creator>zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-76073</guid>
		<description>i understand i would think that at least give tscc a half season, im ean the numbers were ok, tscc had one of the most difficult spots of any show...after a season finale like that there are lot of unanswered numbers or not i think tscc just needs a little more chance mant stopped watching because the story,line was slow but in the end john following riley half the time, i just think fox would be stupid to take tscc off the numbers were higher in the fall, and since thats fox&#039;s fault for moving to fri why not put them back, and wtf did they move them in the first place they were get almost twice the viewers on mom, i mean they were doin decent in the 1st half of the season ad there were a few bad episodes every show struggles i think tscc just had a bad half and would improve i think fox is considering that sure the numbers are great but over has done average..and why have DVR if it doesnt count if you think about it, i bet half of americans have either dvtr or satellite, the truth is people who have cable is declining why do u think the numbers are low, i believe thats part of the reason why fri is low, and im only being optimistic, sry bill didnt mean to be harsh, i know numbers are important, but i would think fox shoulld at least do half a season see where they stand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i understand i would think that at least give tscc a half season, im ean the numbers were ok, tscc had one of the most difficult spots of any show&#8230;after a season finale like that there are lot of unanswered numbers or not i think tscc just needs a little more chance mant stopped watching because the story,line was slow but in the end john following riley half the time, i just think fox would be stupid to take tscc off the numbers were higher in the fall, and since thats fox&#8217;s fault for moving to fri why not put them back, and wtf did they move them in the first place they were get almost twice the viewers on mom, i mean they were doin decent in the 1st half of the season ad there were a few bad episodes every show struggles i think tscc just had a bad half and would improve i think fox is considering that sure the numbers are great but over has done average..and why have DVR if it doesnt count if you think about it, i bet half of americans have either dvtr or satellite, the truth is people who have cable is declining why do u think the numbers are low, i believe thats part of the reason why fri is low, and im only being optimistic, sry bill didnt mean to be harsh, i know numbers are important, but i would think fox shoulld at least do half a season see where they stand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75994</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75994</guid>
		<description>Thanks, craigward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, craigward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigward</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75975</link>
		<dc:creator>craigward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75975</guid>
		<description>American Dad can also be put in black.  Not that many people are on the edge of their seat worrying about it.

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7824
http://www.tv.com/story/11811.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American Dad can also be put in black.  Not that many people are on the edge of their seat worrying about it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7824" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=7824</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tv.com/story/11811.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tv.com/story/11811.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75747</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75747</guid>
		<description>Zac, the Internet does not = ratings or Battlestar Galactica and Gossip Girl would have 20 million viewers and Heroes would still be a top five show.

We post our predictions as predictions.  But in the case of TSCC it&#039;s not speculation, but rather that we&#039;re merely waiting for the announcement.  There is absolutely no way TSCC will be back on FOX next season.  You can count on that, even without the press release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac, the Internet does not = ratings or Battlestar Galactica and Gossip Girl would have 20 million viewers and Heroes would still be a top five show.</p>
<p>We post our predictions as predictions.  But in the case of TSCC it&#8217;s not speculation, but rather that we&#8217;re merely waiting for the announcement.  There is absolutely no way TSCC will be back on FOX next season.  You can count on that, even without the press release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75746</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75746</guid>
		<description>zac, the numbers are all the evidence I need for TSCC. And you&#039;re right. I *hate* to be proven wrong. But there&#039;s no chance of that in TSCC&#039;s case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zac, the numbers are all the evidence I need for TSCC. And you&#8217;re right. I *hate* to be proven wrong. But there&#8217;s no chance of that in TSCC&#8217;s case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zac</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75735</link>
		<dc:creator>zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75735</guid>
		<description>bill if the shouting were done on TSCC then why is it all over the freaking internet that people want it back/?? and until you have a reliable source, such as fox don&#039;t post speculation on the show you would hate to be proved wrong, sure the numbers are bad, but  get ur evidence first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill if the shouting were done on TSCC then why is it all over the freaking internet that people want it back/?? and until you have a reliable source, such as fox don&#8217;t post speculation on the show you would hate to be proved wrong, sure the numbers are bad, but  get ur evidence first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75723</guid>
		<description>Michael, but if you add the Til Death episodes ordered (but unaired) for this season and next season you&#039;re at 81 episodes. And while it&#039;s not the traditional magic 100 needed for syndication, it seems that &quot;81 may be the new 100&quot;.

As to when the hell all those ratings sapping episodes are going to air, I&#039;m still waiting for the &#039;Til Death Independence Day Marathon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, but if you add the Til Death episodes ordered (but unaired) for this season and next season you&#8217;re at 81 episodes. And while it&#8217;s not the traditional magic 100 needed for syndication, it seems that &#8220;81 may be the new 100&#8243;.</p>
<p>As to when the hell all those ratings sapping episodes are going to air, I&#8217;m still waiting for the &#8216;Til Death Independence Day Marathon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75722</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75722</guid>
		<description>Whatever dirt Brad Garrett has on Murdoch, Mitch Hurwitz better get himself some of it and fast, because without it, there&#039;s no way in hell Sony can save his latest bomb beyond its five-week trial run. Didn&#039;t that guy win back to back Emmys for &quot;outstanding&quot; comedy writing? Back to back Emmys, and THIS is what he comes up with? Here&#039;s my catchphrase: OVERRATED HACK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever dirt Brad Garrett has on Murdoch, Mitch Hurwitz better get himself some of it and fast, because without it, there&#8217;s no way in hell Sony can save his latest bomb beyond its five-week trial run. Didn&#8217;t that guy win back to back Emmys for &#8220;outstanding&#8221; comedy writing? Back to back Emmys, and THIS is what he comes up with? Here&#8217;s my catchphrase: OVERRATED HACK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75719</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75719</guid>
		<description>One thing about &#039;Til Death- isn&#039;t it a bit early to be thinking about syndication? Less than 50 episodes have aired. (I&#039;m not sure how many have been produced.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about &#8216;Til Death- isn&#8217;t it a bit early to be thinking about syndication? Less than 50 episodes have aired. (I&#8217;m not sure how many have been produced.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caven</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75713</link>
		<dc:creator>Caven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75713</guid>
		<description>hagi says: 
&quot;If u use single digit after decimal point, rounding must be proper, 1.25 rounds to 1.3… For its Monday numbers: 2.726 m/1.32=2.06=2.1&quot;

hagi, that only applies to rounding, not truncating.  There is no law that prohibits someone from truncating numbers instead of rounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hagi says:<br />
&#8220;If u use single digit after decimal point, rounding must be proper, 1.25 rounds to 1.3… For its Monday numbers: 2.726 m/1.32=2.06=2.1&#8243;</p>
<p>hagi, that only applies to rounding, not truncating.  There is no law that prohibits someone from truncating numbers instead of rounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75632</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75632</guid>
		<description>I think if Sit Down comes back it will be along with King of the Hill in the 7 or 7:30 hour and even then just to fill the schedule so it would be void of repeats. Like this

7:00 King of the Hill
7:30 Sit Down, Shut Up
8:00 The Simpsons
8:30 American Dad
9:00 Family Guy
9:30 The Cleveland Show</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if Sit Down comes back it will be along with King of the Hill in the 7 or 7:30 hour and even then just to fill the schedule so it would be void of repeats. Like this</p>
<p>7:00 King of the Hill<br />
7:30 Sit Down, Shut Up<br />
8:00 The Simpsons<br />
8:30 American Dad<br />
9:00 Family Guy<br />
9:30 The Cleveland Show</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Norman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75588</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75588</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Yes, I read your article above and saw that you mentioned that. 
Thanks

P.S. I really doubt that Til Death will find an audience in syndication either!!
It simply is a bad show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Yes, I read your article above and saw that you mentioned that.<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>P.S. I really doubt that Til Death will find an audience in syndication either!!<br />
It simply is a bad show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75574</guid>
		<description>J. Norman, Sony (Til Death&#039;s producer) made Fox some ridiculously good deal to get enough episodes for syndication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Norman, Sony (Til Death&#8217;s producer) made Fox some ridiculously good deal to get enough episodes for syndication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Norman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75567</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75567</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t believe that Til Death is renewed again. Man, 6&#039;8&quot;  Brad Garrett must either totally intimidate the suits at Fox or he really has something on Rupert Murdoch. His show is not funny at all, he is plain ass obnoxious as hell, and the ratings suck to boot. 
Can anyone tell me any other reasons why this show is still on or for that matter, how it survived being cancelled in its first season? Unbelievable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#8217;t believe that Til Death is renewed again. Man, 6&#8217;8&#8243;  Brad Garrett must either totally intimidate the suits at Fox or he really has something on Rupert Murdoch. His show is not funny at all, he is plain ass obnoxious as hell, and the ratings suck to boot.<br />
Can anyone tell me any other reasons why this show is still on or for that matter, how it survived being cancelled in its first season? Unbelievable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75544</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75544</guid>
		<description>Another problem with Dollhouse is that Whedon tried to make Adelle and Topher sympathetic and then we learn that Sierra was forced into the Dollhouse and is essentially being raped. Does anyone want to watch a show about sympathetic rapists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem with Dollhouse is that Whedon tried to make Adelle and Topher sympathetic and then we learn that Sierra was forced into the Dollhouse and is essentially being raped. Does anyone want to watch a show about sympathetic rapists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75543</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75543</guid>
		<description>Also regarding Fringe, during the ending to last night&#039;s episode where Walter is watching the old VHS tape of his experiments. Wasn&#039;t it awesome to hear Leonard Nimoy&#039;s voice as William Bell and know the rumour from a few weeks ago is definitely true?!

Second season of Fringe, yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also regarding Fringe, during the ending to last night&#8217;s episode where Walter is watching the old VHS tape of his experiments. Wasn&#8217;t it awesome to hear Leonard Nimoy&#8217;s voice as William Bell and know the rumour from a few weeks ago is definitely true?!</p>
<p>Second season of Fringe, yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanaticROCKS!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-2/#comment-75530</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanaticROCKS!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75530</guid>
		<description>TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES, DOLLHOUSE and SIT DOWN, SHUT UP will not come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES, DOLLHOUSE and SIT DOWN, SHUT UP will not come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75493</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75493</guid>
		<description>Fringe and LTM both look safe on the index.  I hope LTM creeps up a tick or two tonight; they are promoting it with more personal story angles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fringe and LTM both look safe on the index.  I hope LTM creeps up a tick or two tonight; they are promoting it with more personal story angles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75487</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75487</guid>
		<description>Alexis, actually, yes. Although it didn&#039;t do a damn thing for moving the overall story arc along, it was pretty good in my view for a straight up monster story. I thought the monster was cool even though I thought it a stretch for a transgenic experiment - sucker was a little BIG for being a gila monster mixed with a bat! LOL!

But then the episode with the guy changing into a weird monster on the plane was a bit of a stretch, too. But this show relies on such stretches, it&#039;s all good clean fun, as it were. The important thing is the overall story arc, the pacing and the characters, all of which is good stuff.

But having TWO such shows in a row not moving the story arc along is not good.

They better not ignore that guy changing into...something and smashing his way out of the hospital for another episode - that just makes no sense at all. That&#039;s the same mistake TSCC made when it came back from hiatus - three painfully slow, irrelevant episodes that only emphasized how stupid the &quot;heroes&quot; were being made to look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis, actually, yes. Although it didn&#8217;t do a damn thing for moving the overall story arc along, it was pretty good in my view for a straight up monster story. I thought the monster was cool even though I thought it a stretch for a transgenic experiment &#8211; sucker was a little BIG for being a gila monster mixed with a bat! LOL!</p>
<p>But then the episode with the guy changing into a weird monster on the plane was a bit of a stretch, too. But this show relies on such stretches, it&#8217;s all good clean fun, as it were. The important thing is the overall story arc, the pacing and the characters, all of which is good stuff.</p>
<p>But having TWO such shows in a row not moving the story arc along is not good.</p>
<p>They better not ignore that guy changing into&#8230;something and smashing his way out of the hospital for another episode &#8211; that just makes no sense at all. That&#8217;s the same mistake TSCC made when it came back from hiatus &#8211; three painfully slow, irrelevant episodes that only emphasized how stupid the &#8220;heroes&#8221; were being made to look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75479</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75479</guid>
		<description>I think the real problem is that the moment you put an intelligent show on in america most of the populace doesn&#039;t understand it and stops watching.  Granted that makes it so everyone else has to suffer from terrible television with hilariously simple premises and extremely predictable plot lines.  That and reality TV.  Why must reality TV exist?  Can&#039;t someone make reality TV go away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real problem is that the moment you put an intelligent show on in america most of the populace doesn&#8217;t understand it and stops watching.  Granted that makes it so everyone else has to suffer from terrible television with hilariously simple premises and extremely predictable plot lines.  That and reality TV.  Why must reality TV exist?  Can&#8217;t someone make reality TV go away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75478</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75478</guid>
		<description>So did the latest Fringe episode satisfied you, RSH? Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did the latest Fringe episode satisfied you, RSH? Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75476</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75476</guid>
		<description>Kirk Acevedo (aka Charlie Francis) apparently confirmed in an interview that he was shooting a stand alone episode for season 2. He also mentioned a &quot;coming war&quot; - which means there definitely will be more going on in season 2 to further the overall concept.

The numbers say Fringe will be back, there just hasn&#039;t been any official announcement - which is why Bill has it in green!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk Acevedo (aka Charlie Francis) apparently confirmed in an interview that he was shooting a stand alone episode for season 2. He also mentioned a &#8220;coming war&#8221; &#8211; which means there definitely will be more going on in season 2 to further the overall concept.</p>
<p>The numbers say Fringe will be back, there just hasn&#8217;t been any official announcement &#8211; which is why Bill has it in green!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75475</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75475</guid>
		<description>i noticed Gina Torres was in all the ABC early cancellations  but the currently records for show / ratings killing goes to Rena Sofa she adds Dirty Sexy Money to her endless list that impressively includes even bringing down Heroes and 24</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i noticed Gina Torres was in all the ABC early cancellations  but the currently records for show / ratings killing goes to Rena Sofa she adds Dirty Sexy Money to her endless list that impressively includes even bringing down Heroes and 24</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75473</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75473</guid>
		<description>I think V will have worse problems than Alan. I never got into that show back when the original aired. I doubt they can do better this time. Still Battlestar apparently did. But the new Battlestar, even the old Battlestar, had a better premise than V ever did.

V premise: &quot;Nice&quot; aliens turn out to be rotters.

That&#039;s a &quot;duh&quot; premise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think V will have worse problems than Alan. I never got into that show back when the original aired. I doubt they can do better this time. Still Battlestar apparently did. But the new Battlestar, even the old Battlestar, had a better premise than V ever did.</p>
<p>V premise: &#8220;Nice&#8221; aliens turn out to be rotters.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a &#8220;duh&#8221; premise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75472</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75472</guid>
		<description>About Fringe... didn&#039;t I read an interview somewhere with some of the Fringe cast saying that they&#039;d started filming Season 2 already? If that&#039;s not an indicator of renewal, I don&#039;t know what is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Fringe&#8230; didn&#8217;t I read an interview somewhere with some of the Fringe cast saying that they&#8217;d started filming Season 2 already? If that&#8217;s not an indicator of renewal, I don&#8217;t know what is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75470</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75470</guid>
		<description>Hagi, it&#039;s not coming back whether there are two significant digits or 20, but I agree it would&#039;ve been simpler for Bill to just put it at 1.3 and leave it at that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hagi, it&#8217;s not coming back whether there are two significant digits or 20, but I agree it would&#8217;ve been simpler for Bill to just put it at 1.3 and leave it at that <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hagi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171/comment-page-1/#comment-75469</link>
		<dc:creator>hagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/21/sit-down-shut-up-slow-start-slim-chance/17171#comment-75469</guid>
		<description>If u use single digit after decimal point, rounding must be proper, 1.25  rounds to 1.3...  For its Monday  numbers: 2.726 m/1.32=2.06=2.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u use single digit after decimal point, rounding must be proper, 1.25  rounds to 1.3&#8230;  For its Monday  numbers: 2.726 m/1.32=2.06=2.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

