<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollhouse returns.  How will it do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-78417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-78417</guid>
		<description>Nick to be clear on this my point was that I think a strong Friday debut for Dollhouse ultimately erases the argument that the bad word of mouth killed the show before it started. When the show debuts with all things considered strong numbers and then dies obviously the interest was there and the problem is less the bad reviews and more that the bad reviews were right. Could the show have done better without the pre-debut bad buzz? Probably, I don’t share your optimism that it would have done dramatically better on a Fox Friday with a Terminator lead-in without the bad press (and telling me its been done over the past 30-years won’t change that because shows over the past 30-years have 30+ million viewers but I don’t expect that to happen again) but I still think with or without the bad press the show as it is would have died a painful death - the drop just would have been bigger. 

I personally don’t think the original pilot would have been much better than the one that aired and I don’t think it would have made much difference to the show either way because even the high quality episodes have been incredibly flawed because of the shows concept and execution, there’s just nobody in the entire show to really root for or care about and nothing short of a major concept and direction change for the show would solve that. Although I say all that having not read the script, but everything I’ve heard about it leads me to believe that’s probably a safe bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick to be clear on this my point was that I think a strong Friday debut for Dollhouse ultimately erases the argument that the bad word of mouth killed the show before it started. When the show debuts with all things considered strong numbers and then dies obviously the interest was there and the problem is less the bad reviews and more that the bad reviews were right. Could the show have done better without the pre-debut bad buzz? Probably, I don’t share your optimism that it would have done dramatically better on a Fox Friday with a Terminator lead-in without the bad press (and telling me its been done over the past 30-years won’t change that because shows over the past 30-years have 30+ million viewers but I don’t expect that to happen again) but I still think with or without the bad press the show as it is would have died a painful death &#8211; the drop just would have been bigger. </p>
<p>I personally don’t think the original pilot would have been much better than the one that aired and I don’t think it would have made much difference to the show either way because even the high quality episodes have been incredibly flawed because of the shows concept and execution, there’s just nobody in the entire show to really root for or care about and nothing short of a major concept and direction change for the show would solve that. Although I say all that having not read the script, but everything I’ve heard about it leads me to believe that’s probably a safe bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-78399</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-78399</guid>
		<description>&quot;Actually in the Terminator franchise, people aren’t supposed to connect with the Terminator. They’re supposed to connect with the two humans which are part of the Terminator formula: two humand and (at least) one Terminator. The humans are for the audience to connect with and the Terminator is WHY the audience is supposed to connect with the humans.&quot;

I would recommend reading James Cameron&#039;s screenplays for Terminator and T2.  Not only are they brilliantly written (the guy&#039;s a genius), but the cybernetic organisms are well defined.  From the first script:

&quot;The Terminator&#039;s an infiltration unit. Part man, part machine.  Underneath it&#039;s a hyper-alloy combat chassis.  Microprocessor controlled.  Fully armoured, very tough.  Outside it&#039;s living human tissue.  Flesh, skin, hair, blood - grown for the cyborgs.&quot;

They are part man, part machine, which is what makes the concept particularly facinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Actually in the Terminator franchise, people aren’t supposed to connect with the Terminator. They’re supposed to connect with the two humans which are part of the Terminator formula: two humand and (at least) one Terminator. The humans are for the audience to connect with and the Terminator is WHY the audience is supposed to connect with the humans.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would recommend reading James Cameron&#8217;s screenplays for Terminator and T2.  Not only are they brilliantly written (the guy&#8217;s a genius), but the cybernetic organisms are well defined.  From the first script:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Terminator&#8217;s an infiltration unit. Part man, part machine.  Underneath it&#8217;s a hyper-alloy combat chassis.  Microprocessor controlled.  Fully armoured, very tough.  Outside it&#8217;s living human tissue.  Flesh, skin, hair, blood &#8211; grown for the cyborgs.&#8221;</p>
<p>They are part man, part machine, which is what makes the concept particularly facinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-78027</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-78027</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t underestimate Summer at all. She&#039;s excellent, especially at this sort of role, and I said so in my post. But the role being discussed is particularly difficult as others have said because no matter how well you do it, there&#039;s no &quot;there&quot; for the audience to connect with.

Personally I think Summer would elevate the ratings of the show just by being on it more than Dushku does. But that isn&#039;t going to happen because the show is a Dushku vehicle.

Actually in the Terminator franchise, people aren&#039;t supposed to connect with the Terminator. They&#039;re supposed to connect with the two humans which are part of the Terminator formula: two humand and (at least) one Terminator. The humans are for the audience to connect with and the Terminator is WHY the audience is supposed to connect with the humans.

In Dollhouse, the only &quot;humans&quot; are the bad guys and the FBI agent. Everybody else is a Doll. The FBI agent really hasn&#039;t been the focus. Personally I think the actor playing Ballard is doing a pretty good job given his role. I&#039;m not sure he could carry the show as the central focus and POV of the show, because he&#039;s not intense enough. I find Harry Lennix to be an acceptable actor, but he&#039;s part of the &quot;bad guys&quot; and also isn&#039;t intense enough to be the POV and focus.

Eliza could have been the focus and POV of the show, but not as a Doll. Perhaps she should have been a character on the run from the Dollhouse and Alpha and trying to expose the Dollhouse to the FBI agent. That would have put two reasonably likable characters as the focus of the show. Caroline would have had a more interesting permanent personality.

Adelle is interesting, but she&#039;s more interesting as the controlled manager of the Dollhouse, not someone who&#039;s a) been played for laughs in one episode, b) played as a damaged personality in a second episode, and c) in last week&#039;s episode played as someone crying over the loss of a friend. I would prefer to see her portrayed as a cold-blooded bitch to take advantage of that fine Brit accent. She was at her best activating Mellie to kill the handler and sending Dominic to &quot;The Attic&quot;. 

She needs to be someone who knows what the Dollhouse is really for and is perfectly fine with it. Instead, she acts like a low level manager who really doesn&#039;t know what&#039;s going on upstairs. This would appear to reflect the fact that Whedon originally didn&#039;t have the Dollhouse as being this big conspiracy. So that implies the DeWitt character has been written for one scenario when the show has turned into another. Which again implies that Whedon doesn&#039;t really know where he&#039;s going with the show, as he indicated in his interview.

It would seem Whedon can&#039;t really decide WHO these people all are and what their actual roles are in the show. Or perhaps he&#039;s trying to make them all &quot;human&quot; in some way - which isn&#039;t really workable, since the concept needs villains and heroes. They don&#039;t have to be one-dimensional villains and heroes, but they do need to be identifiably one or the other. Instead he&#039;s juggling them as villains and heroes from one week to the next, which further dilutes the audience&#039;s ability to focus on the characterization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t underestimate Summer at all. She&#8217;s excellent, especially at this sort of role, and I said so in my post. But the role being discussed is particularly difficult as others have said because no matter how well you do it, there&#8217;s no &#8220;there&#8221; for the audience to connect with.</p>
<p>Personally I think Summer would elevate the ratings of the show just by being on it more than Dushku does. But that isn&#8217;t going to happen because the show is a Dushku vehicle.</p>
<p>Actually in the Terminator franchise, people aren&#8217;t supposed to connect with the Terminator. They&#8217;re supposed to connect with the two humans which are part of the Terminator formula: two humand and (at least) one Terminator. The humans are for the audience to connect with and the Terminator is WHY the audience is supposed to connect with the humans.</p>
<p>In Dollhouse, the only &#8220;humans&#8221; are the bad guys and the FBI agent. Everybody else is a Doll. The FBI agent really hasn&#8217;t been the focus. Personally I think the actor playing Ballard is doing a pretty good job given his role. I&#8217;m not sure he could carry the show as the central focus and POV of the show, because he&#8217;s not intense enough. I find Harry Lennix to be an acceptable actor, but he&#8217;s part of the &#8220;bad guys&#8221; and also isn&#8217;t intense enough to be the POV and focus.</p>
<p>Eliza could have been the focus and POV of the show, but not as a Doll. Perhaps she should have been a character on the run from the Dollhouse and Alpha and trying to expose the Dollhouse to the FBI agent. That would have put two reasonably likable characters as the focus of the show. Caroline would have had a more interesting permanent personality.</p>
<p>Adelle is interesting, but she&#8217;s more interesting as the controlled manager of the Dollhouse, not someone who&#8217;s a) been played for laughs in one episode, b) played as a damaged personality in a second episode, and c) in last week&#8217;s episode played as someone crying over the loss of a friend. I would prefer to see her portrayed as a cold-blooded bitch to take advantage of that fine Brit accent. She was at her best activating Mellie to kill the handler and sending Dominic to &#8220;The Attic&#8221;. </p>
<p>She needs to be someone who knows what the Dollhouse is really for and is perfectly fine with it. Instead, she acts like a low level manager who really doesn&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on upstairs. This would appear to reflect the fact that Whedon originally didn&#8217;t have the Dollhouse as being this big conspiracy. So that implies the DeWitt character has been written for one scenario when the show has turned into another. Which again implies that Whedon doesn&#8217;t really know where he&#8217;s going with the show, as he indicated in his interview.</p>
<p>It would seem Whedon can&#8217;t really decide WHO these people all are and what their actual roles are in the show. Or perhaps he&#8217;s trying to make them all &#8220;human&#8221; in some way &#8211; which isn&#8217;t really workable, since the concept needs villains and heroes. They don&#8217;t have to be one-dimensional villains and heroes, but they do need to be identifiably one or the other. Instead he&#8217;s juggling them as villains and heroes from one week to the next, which further dilutes the audience&#8217;s ability to focus on the characterization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-78023</link>
		<dc:creator>Remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-78023</guid>
		<description>Glau is definitely top-notch. I think Cameron&#039;s personality could be developed in a very interesting way, more should have been done in season 2 and I agree with critics on that point. I really hope we will get to see her develop if we get more episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glau is definitely top-notch. I think Cameron&#8217;s personality could be developed in a very interesting way, more should have been done in season 2 and I agree with critics on that point. I really hope we will get to see her develop if we get more episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77802</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77802</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even playing a robot would be easier for Glau - or any actress - than that. Glau IS excellent at portraying psychologically damaged or unusual females, and she can express a character’s reactions even when the character - like Cameron on TSCC - doesn’t actually HAVE any, so she might well have done a much better job of portraying Echo’s lack of personality. But I’m not sure it would have helped the show overall since the character itself has no audience connection.&quot;

Mr. Hack, IMO you&#039;ve unintentionally underestimated Glau&#039;s craft.  Her work is excellent on TSSC.  The show soars when she&#039;s onscreen.  Of course, technically the character has no personality, but the role requires great emotional availability to infuse a balance of brute strength and sophisticated restraint into the eyes of this cyborg.  Glau has serious chops.  She would elevate anything she applied her skill to.  It&#039;s DOLLHOUSE that lacks a personality and that responsibility is Joss Whendon&#039;s.  They&#039;re his choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even playing a robot would be easier for Glau &#8211; or any actress &#8211; than that. Glau IS excellent at portraying psychologically damaged or unusual females, and she can express a character’s reactions even when the character &#8211; like Cameron on TSCC &#8211; doesn’t actually HAVE any, so she might well have done a much better job of portraying Echo’s lack of personality. But I’m not sure it would have helped the show overall since the character itself has no audience connection.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Hack, IMO you&#8217;ve unintentionally underestimated Glau&#8217;s craft.  Her work is excellent on TSSC.  The show soars when she&#8217;s onscreen.  Of course, technically the character has no personality, but the role requires great emotional availability to infuse a balance of brute strength and sophisticated restraint into the eyes of this cyborg.  Glau has serious chops.  She would elevate anything she applied her skill to.  It&#8217;s DOLLHOUSE that lacks a personality and that responsibility is Joss Whendon&#8217;s.  They&#8217;re his choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77798</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77798</guid>
		<description>The whole idea that bad press doesn&#039;t hurt is absurd.  Yes, the show debuted to a 2.0, but if it had been all hype instead of all bad press I&#039;d bet the number would have been closer to a 3.0 which a Friday most definitely can produce.  Put NCIS for new episodes on Friday and watch what happens.

Fridays in the past have been the top night of TV viewing for the week.  CBS and ABC have both accomplished this in the last 30 years.  

The drop from a 2.0 to 1.8 to 1.7 to 1.6 was all due to poor writing.  I&#039;ve read the original pilot and while it would have made a better episode, I agree with many of the changes made.  I understand why they were made.  It was the right decision to make then, but the show should have focused on the FBI agent and done it from his POV.  The sad fact remains that the follow up episodes would have been crap.  It doesn&#039;t matter that the show&#039;s quality is now leagues better because the initial impression has already been made.

Which brings up the reason you renew:  Make a new impression.  Renewing would create buzz and hype because the reason would be &quot;The quality is exceptional, they turned around the show from poor quality to hight quality.&quot;  Say it enough, get the press to repeat it, and people may buy it.  

What if the first episode that 2.0 rating group had been of the quality of product they&#039;re churning out now?  Your talking better reviews, less &quot;bad word of mouth,&quot; before it ever aired and likely some hype.  Then would it have dropped, held steady, or grown?  I&#039;d bet it would have held steady.

So if FOX is really believing in the product being delivered that is why there is talk of renewal.  It&#039;s profitable, it&#039;s delivering quality goods.  So now you just have to change the image the brand is currently portraying.  Which if FOX renews is a much easier task than NBC has with HEROES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole idea that bad press doesn&#8217;t hurt is absurd.  Yes, the show debuted to a 2.0, but if it had been all hype instead of all bad press I&#8217;d bet the number would have been closer to a 3.0 which a Friday most definitely can produce.  Put NCIS for new episodes on Friday and watch what happens.</p>
<p>Fridays in the past have been the top night of TV viewing for the week.  CBS and ABC have both accomplished this in the last 30 years.  </p>
<p>The drop from a 2.0 to 1.8 to 1.7 to 1.6 was all due to poor writing.  I&#8217;ve read the original pilot and while it would have made a better episode, I agree with many of the changes made.  I understand why they were made.  It was the right decision to make then, but the show should have focused on the FBI agent and done it from his POV.  The sad fact remains that the follow up episodes would have been crap.  It doesn&#8217;t matter that the show&#8217;s quality is now leagues better because the initial impression has already been made.</p>
<p>Which brings up the reason you renew:  Make a new impression.  Renewing would create buzz and hype because the reason would be &#8220;The quality is exceptional, they turned around the show from poor quality to hight quality.&#8221;  Say it enough, get the press to repeat it, and people may buy it.  </p>
<p>What if the first episode that 2.0 rating group had been of the quality of product they&#8217;re churning out now?  Your talking better reviews, less &#8220;bad word of mouth,&#8221; before it ever aired and likely some hype.  Then would it have dropped, held steady, or grown?  I&#8217;d bet it would have held steady.</p>
<p>So if FOX is really believing in the product being delivered that is why there is talk of renewal.  It&#8217;s profitable, it&#8217;s delivering quality goods.  So now you just have to change the image the brand is currently portraying.  Which if FOX renews is a much easier task than NBC has with HEROES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTunedIn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77775</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTunedIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77775</guid>
		<description>If the caroline character was more likable and we continued to see that struggle of Caroline trying to reassert control, I think we could get invested. But people who break into medical testing facilities to release animals (ok maybe just film) reminds me of the movie 28 days and I just roll my eyes at them.

If Caroline had been done differently then I could feel for Echo... In fact I wouldn&#039;t consider her Echo but still Caroline and be hoping for her to break out of it.  As it is now Echo is an improvement over Caroline.

Anyway, I agree.  Echo shouldn&#039;t be the focus, but I do feel that the last few episodes have started to spread the focus around a lot.  Like on Adelle for example.  I think the last few episodes have been a vast improvement over earlier in the series.  I do want to see some advancement in the Alpha plot line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the caroline character was more likable and we continued to see that struggle of Caroline trying to reassert control, I think we could get invested. But people who break into medical testing facilities to release animals (ok maybe just film) reminds me of the movie 28 days and I just roll my eyes at them.</p>
<p>If Caroline had been done differently then I could feel for Echo&#8230; In fact I wouldn&#8217;t consider her Echo but still Caroline and be hoping for her to break out of it.  As it is now Echo is an improvement over Caroline.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree.  Echo shouldn&#8217;t be the focus, but I do feel that the last few episodes have started to spread the focus around a lot.  Like on Adelle for example.  I think the last few episodes have been a vast improvement over earlier in the series.  I do want to see some advancement in the Alpha plot line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77772</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77772</guid>
		<description>I think Sierra and Victor are a much easier role than Echo and even Sierra has been very hit and miss. In general Echo and Dushku would be fine if she weren&#039;t the focus of the show. I just don&#039;t see why anyone thought it was a good idea to make the lead character of the show someone who has no personality and gets their memory wiped at the end of every episode. The whole concept and structure of the show is flawed. As background/supporting characters the dolls work but as central figures they don&#039;t at all because there&#039;s nothing to get invested in.

If through Ballard we had learned who one of these dolls was before they became a doll and had some kind of relationship/desire to see that person return then I think the dolls and the slow tease of them not being completely wiped become more interesting. Although I will say the Caroline character they finally introduced is horrible and I have no desire to see Echo revert back to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sierra and Victor are a much easier role than Echo and even Sierra has been very hit and miss. In general Echo and Dushku would be fine if she weren&#8217;t the focus of the show. I just don&#8217;t see why anyone thought it was a good idea to make the lead character of the show someone who has no personality and gets their memory wiped at the end of every episode. The whole concept and structure of the show is flawed. As background/supporting characters the dolls work but as central figures they don&#8217;t at all because there&#8217;s nothing to get invested in.</p>
<p>If through Ballard we had learned who one of these dolls was before they became a doll and had some kind of relationship/desire to see that person return then I think the dolls and the slow tease of them not being completely wiped become more interesting. Although I will say the Caroline character they finally introduced is horrible and I have no desire to see Echo revert back to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTunedIn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77770</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTunedIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77770</guid>
		<description>@RSH:  The actress playing Sierra has been doing a decent job.  Even Victor has been.  The role is not unworkable. It can be a struggle I guess, but two other actors in the series have done well with it.  

You&#039;re right though that this is more a Dushku vehicle than a Joss story.  She has been improving though.  I liked her in this last episode... a little.  I LOVED Sierra in this last episode even if it was filler.  I would watch the Sierra/Topher scenes again.  

It would be interesting to see what Summer would do and I kind of hope for a second season to see if they could get her to be a guest doll.  Maybe one that had been locked away in the attic but who gets free because of Alpha.  OOO, the story potential.  

Watching T:TSCC over again from the beginning I&#039;m seeing what you&#039;ve been saying about Glau&#039;s acting cred.  I think she could do the doll well and would love to see her in a role like this.  Hm, maybe that could be a gimmick of the show.  Get random cult stars from other shows to come on as dolls for single episodes.  Fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RSH:  The actress playing Sierra has been doing a decent job.  Even Victor has been.  The role is not unworkable. It can be a struggle I guess, but two other actors in the series have done well with it.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right though that this is more a Dushku vehicle than a Joss story.  She has been improving though.  I liked her in this last episode&#8230; a little.  I LOVED Sierra in this last episode even if it was filler.  I would watch the Sierra/Topher scenes again.  </p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what Summer would do and I kind of hope for a second season to see if they could get her to be a guest doll.  Maybe one that had been locked away in the attic but who gets free because of Alpha.  OOO, the story potential.  </p>
<p>Watching T:TSCC over again from the beginning I&#8217;m seeing what you&#8217;ve been saying about Glau&#8217;s acting cred.  I think she could do the doll well and would love to see her in a role like this.  Hm, maybe that could be a gimmick of the show.  Get random cult stars from other shows to come on as dolls for single episodes.  Fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTunedIn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77767</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTunedIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77767</guid>
		<description>@ Alex:  I think the show tried to do that but with Boyd.  It didn&#039;t work out very well because Boyd isn&#039;t that watchable himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Alex:  I think the show tried to do that but with Boyd.  It didn&#8217;t work out very well because Boyd isn&#8217;t that watchable himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77763</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77763</guid>
		<description>The major mistake Whedon made with Dollhouse is focusing on the Dollhouse and the dolls right out of the gate because there’s nobody we want to root for in the Dollhouse, because they’re either personality and character free dolls who get their memories wiped at the end of every episode or they’re people holding said dolls prisoner. The way into this series was the FBI agent trying to uncover the Dollhouse and he was horrifically miscast and written. For all the bad press Dushku has received for Dollhouse she is infinitely better as Echo and her various imprints (which is an incredibly difficult role) than Tahmoh Penikett is as Ballard.

The early focus of Dollhouse should have been on establishing Ballard, who he is, why he’s searching for the Dollhouse and more importantly why we care about him and that quest. The show desperately needs an anchor that viewers can cling to and root for and Ballard is the only character in the show that fits that mould. Once you’ve established him you can start to get more focused on the Dollhouse what it is and why it exists. If the first five episodes of the show had been about Ballard chasing Echo and the Dollhouse and then led into the sixth episode that we saw I think people would feel much happier and excited about the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major mistake Whedon made with Dollhouse is focusing on the Dollhouse and the dolls right out of the gate because there’s nobody we want to root for in the Dollhouse, because they’re either personality and character free dolls who get their memories wiped at the end of every episode or they’re people holding said dolls prisoner. The way into this series was the FBI agent trying to uncover the Dollhouse and he was horrifically miscast and written. For all the bad press Dushku has received for Dollhouse she is infinitely better as Echo and her various imprints (which is an incredibly difficult role) than Tahmoh Penikett is as Ballard.</p>
<p>The early focus of Dollhouse should have been on establishing Ballard, who he is, why he’s searching for the Dollhouse and more importantly why we care about him and that quest. The show desperately needs an anchor that viewers can cling to and root for and Ballard is the only character in the show that fits that mould. Once you’ve established him you can start to get more focused on the Dollhouse what it is and why it exists. If the first five episodes of the show had been about Ballard chasing Echo and the Dollhouse and then led into the sixth episode that we saw I think people would feel much happier and excited about the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77719</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77719</guid>
		<description>Well, since the show basically was Joss Whedon producing a vehicle for Eliza Dushku - who is an executive producer - it&#039;s hard to say he should have cast someone else. By definition, he wasn&#039;t going to. The show was created over a four hour lunch between Eliza and Joss.

And while Summer Glau is both a terrific actress and hugely popular - more so than Dushku in my opinion despite Dushku&#039;s background on Buffy - she would have had a problem portraying Echo just as Dushku has - because Echo has no &quot;character&quot; to portray. Even playing a robot would be easier for Glau - or any actress - than that. Glau IS excellent at portraying psychologically damaged or unusual females, and she can express a character&#039;s reactions even when the character - like Cameron on TSCC - doesn&#039;t actually HAVE any, so she might well have done a much better job of portraying Echo&#039;s lack of personality. But I&#039;m not sure it would have helped the show overall since the character itself has no audience connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since the show basically was Joss Whedon producing a vehicle for Eliza Dushku &#8211; who is an executive producer &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to say he should have cast someone else. By definition, he wasn&#8217;t going to. The show was created over a four hour lunch between Eliza and Joss.</p>
<p>And while Summer Glau is both a terrific actress and hugely popular &#8211; more so than Dushku in my opinion despite Dushku&#8217;s background on Buffy &#8211; she would have had a problem portraying Echo just as Dushku has &#8211; because Echo has no &#8220;character&#8221; to portray. Even playing a robot would be easier for Glau &#8211; or any actress &#8211; than that. Glau IS excellent at portraying psychologically damaged or unusual females, and she can express a character&#8217;s reactions even when the character &#8211; like Cameron on TSCC &#8211; doesn&#8217;t actually HAVE any, so she might well have done a much better job of portraying Echo&#8217;s lack of personality. But I&#8217;m not sure it would have helped the show overall since the character itself has no audience connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wess</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-8/#comment-77699</link>
		<dc:creator>Wess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77699</guid>
		<description>Summer Glau was busy working on a far better show....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer Glau was busy working on a far better show&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77659</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77659</guid>
		<description>Zak, you&#039;re right.  The dead horse in the middle of the living room is, as you said: Dushku being a sub-par actress and asked to carry a series.  You can tell from the show promos on down.  It was not a good decision.  If Summer Glau had been cast in the role, I predict the results would be very different.  She&#039;s an exciting actress and would have generated buzz.  Choosing Dushku was, to say it plainly, bad casting by Joss Whedon.  It was his responsibility and was an error of judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zak, you&#8217;re right.  The dead horse in the middle of the living room is, as you said: Dushku being a sub-par actress and asked to carry a series.  You can tell from the show promos on down.  It was not a good decision.  If Summer Glau had been cast in the role, I predict the results would be very different.  She&#8217;s an exciting actress and would have generated buzz.  Choosing Dushku was, to say it plainly, bad casting by Joss Whedon.  It was his responsibility and was an error of judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77656</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77656</guid>
		<description>TSCC has more to do with Dollhouse then Prison Break which is probably why we&#039;re seeing the bad numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC has more to do with Dollhouse then Prison Break which is probably why we&#8217;re seeing the bad numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77604</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77604</guid>
		<description>Rufus Dollhouse was never going to debut with a 2.8 on a Friday. 

The truth is that the 2.0 debut was a strong number for a Friday so the audience interest was absolutely there at the start to get it through to a second season. It was even still (just about) there for the second episode, which off the top of my head I&#039;m going to say got a 1.8. 

I think when Fox moved the show to Fridays and it debuted with a 2.0 the press attention before the debut was largely removed from the shows future. It debuted strong and then because of the poor writing, acting and concept it died. It would have done that with or without the its cancelled before its even started buzz. If anything the fall would have been even greater because chances are Fox wouldn&#039;t have moved it to Friday without all those stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rufus Dollhouse was never going to debut with a 2.8 on a Friday. </p>
<p>The truth is that the 2.0 debut was a strong number for a Friday so the audience interest was absolutely there at the start to get it through to a second season. It was even still (just about) there for the second episode, which off the top of my head I&#8217;m going to say got a 1.8. </p>
<p>I think when Fox moved the show to Fridays and it debuted with a 2.0 the press attention before the debut was largely removed from the shows future. It debuted strong and then because of the poor writing, acting and concept it died. It would have done that with or without the its cancelled before its even started buzz. If anything the fall would have been even greater because chances are Fox wouldn&#8217;t have moved it to Friday without all those stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77599</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77599</guid>
		<description>Alex - it DOES affect the fact that it started at 2.0. If it started at 2.8 and dropped to 2.0, we&#039;re all having a different conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; it DOES affect the fact that it started at 2.0. If it started at 2.8 and dropped to 2.0, we&#8217;re all having a different conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77510</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77510</guid>
		<description>Nick the fact that the press has been talking about Dollhouse &#039;not making it&#039; since before it aired doesn&#039;t change the fact that it debuted with a 2.0 and has now dropped to a 1.2. The audience was their for the debut and has slowly turned off. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s down to the press coverage, at least not completely. I think that&#039;s down to people watching and deciding that they agree with the press coverage that this show isn&#039;t going to make it.

Its also worth pointing out that there&#039;s been some very weird &#039;Fringe in trouble&#039; stories doing the rounds that don&#039;t seem to have done much to change Fringe&#039;s momentum.

Dollhouse&#039;s press coverage probably had a lot to do with it being moved to Friday&#039;s but I don&#039;t think its had that much to do with the audience running for the hills every week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick the fact that the press has been talking about Dollhouse &#8216;not making it&#8217; since before it aired doesn&#8217;t change the fact that it debuted with a 2.0 and has now dropped to a 1.2. The audience was their for the debut and has slowly turned off. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s down to the press coverage, at least not completely. I think that&#8217;s down to people watching and deciding that they agree with the press coverage that this show isn&#8217;t going to make it.</p>
<p>Its also worth pointing out that there&#8217;s been some very weird &#8216;Fringe in trouble&#8217; stories doing the rounds that don&#8217;t seem to have done much to change Fringe&#8217;s momentum.</p>
<p>Dollhouse&#8217;s press coverage probably had a lot to do with it being moved to Friday&#8217;s but I don&#8217;t think its had that much to do with the audience running for the hills every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTunedIn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77506</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTunedIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77506</guid>
		<description>Knowing that a show is likely to be cancelled does affect me watching it.  For example, i&#039;ve seen only one episode of pushing daisies, and loved it, and then heard it had already been cancelled, and decided I didn&#039;t want to go through seeing any more episodes just to bummed that it wasn&#039;t coming back.

That also means i won&#039;t be buying a DVD.  That only matters in that if I didn&#039;t know it was going to be cancelled; watching that one episode would have made me watch more and I&#039;m pretty sure that I would have been hooked enough that when the cancellation did come I would have bought the DVD (because that&#039;s the way I am).

I avoid shows that this and other sites say are going to be cancelled or aren&#039;t doing well.  I had watched the first season of Chuck and liked it, and then for some reason went on a hiatus of watching it.  When I found out it was likely going to be cancelled by reading this forum I had no interest in watching it again; before that I was just waiting for the opportunity or expected to catch up when the DVD came out.  When the article about maybe that week would do better because of the affect of house not being on I actually decided to see the episode.  For some reason it sounded like there was hope, and that even though I wouldn&#039;t affect any numbers by watching it was the last time I could watch it with some optimism.  Anyway.

My story just to point out that there are people who have had great shows dropped before (Firefly and Angel really hurt) who get attached to them and who don&#039;t want to go through it again with a show they don&#039;t care about yet.  I&#039;m already going through it with Terminator.  Reading this site kept me from getting too involved with Dollhouse since it was being said it wouldn&#039;t get renewed before it started airing, so I&#039;m not so attached, but watch anyways because it came after Terminator (and I couldn&#039;t help getting mini attached).  But I watch with an eye for everything that I don&#039;t like.  The way someone would watch a movie they had heard nothing but bad reports about.  You stop looking for the good and only look for the bad.  

That sucks for shows but since I&#039;m not a Nielson viewer it doesn&#039;t make much difference.  And since Nielsen viewers love all the shows that I don&#039;t watch I doubt I&#039;m reflective of their behaviours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing that a show is likely to be cancelled does affect me watching it.  For example, i&#8217;ve seen only one episode of pushing daisies, and loved it, and then heard it had already been cancelled, and decided I didn&#8217;t want to go through seeing any more episodes just to bummed that it wasn&#8217;t coming back.</p>
<p>That also means i won&#8217;t be buying a DVD.  That only matters in that if I didn&#8217;t know it was going to be cancelled; watching that one episode would have made me watch more and I&#8217;m pretty sure that I would have been hooked enough that when the cancellation did come I would have bought the DVD (because that&#8217;s the way I am).</p>
<p>I avoid shows that this and other sites say are going to be cancelled or aren&#8217;t doing well.  I had watched the first season of Chuck and liked it, and then for some reason went on a hiatus of watching it.  When I found out it was likely going to be cancelled by reading this forum I had no interest in watching it again; before that I was just waiting for the opportunity or expected to catch up when the DVD came out.  When the article about maybe that week would do better because of the affect of house not being on I actually decided to see the episode.  For some reason it sounded like there was hope, and that even though I wouldn&#8217;t affect any numbers by watching it was the last time I could watch it with some optimism.  Anyway.</p>
<p>My story just to point out that there are people who have had great shows dropped before (Firefly and Angel really hurt) who get attached to them and who don&#8217;t want to go through it again with a show they don&#8217;t care about yet.  I&#8217;m already going through it with Terminator.  Reading this site kept me from getting too involved with Dollhouse since it was being said it wouldn&#8217;t get renewed before it started airing, so I&#8217;m not so attached, but watch anyways because it came after Terminator (and I couldn&#8217;t help getting mini attached).  But I watch with an eye for everything that I don&#8217;t like.  The way someone would watch a movie they had heard nothing but bad reports about.  You stop looking for the good and only look for the bad.  </p>
<p>That sucks for shows but since I&#8217;m not a Nielson viewer it doesn&#8217;t make much difference.  And since Nielsen viewers love all the shows that I don&#8217;t watch I doubt I&#8217;m reflective of their behaviours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puredieselbc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77478</link>
		<dc:creator>puredieselbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77478</guid>
		<description>When you already have so many people thinking the show is cancelled and then the network doesn&#039;t air it for a week...People start to believe, &quot;See it&#039;s not on anymore.&quot;  So of course they wouldn&#039;t tune in the following week.  Oh this thing was a trainwreck from the start.  If they had just stuck with the original pilot which was told from the FBI agent&#039;s POV instead of inside a hi-tech 21st Century brothel, they might of had something.  Oh well two episodes to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you already have so many people thinking the show is cancelled and then the network doesn&#8217;t air it for a week&#8230;People start to believe, &#8220;See it&#8217;s not on anymore.&#8221;  So of course they wouldn&#8217;t tune in the following week.  Oh this thing was a trainwreck from the start.  If they had just stuck with the original pilot which was told from the FBI agent&#8217;s POV instead of inside a hi-tech 21st Century brothel, they might of had something.  Oh well two episodes to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77477</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77477</guid>
		<description>Bill, sorry but it has nothing to do with ratings.  The Press have been talking about DOLLHOUSE likely &quot;not making it,&quot; since before it was ever aired.  To think that the readers of EW, etc. weren&#039;t affected would be foolish.  It goes against a lot of what I know about of the industry.  

The base of DOLLHOUSE are Whedon fans who are huge internet people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, sorry but it has nothing to do with ratings.  The Press have been talking about DOLLHOUSE likely &#8220;not making it,&#8221; since before it was ever aired.  To think that the readers of EW, etc. weren&#8217;t affected would be foolish.  It goes against a lot of what I know about of the industry.  </p>
<p>The base of DOLLHOUSE are Whedon fans who are huge internet people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77454</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77454</guid>
		<description>Dushku being a sub-par actress and asked to stretch week to week is probably the biggest problem with the show. (I agree with sentiment Sierra is much stronger actress.) Use all the technical excuses you want, save two episodes the entire series has been forgettable so far.

This is not Whedon at the top of his game. It makes me think he peaked with Angel and FireFly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dushku being a sub-par actress and asked to stretch week to week is probably the biggest problem with the show. (I agree with sentiment Sierra is much stronger actress.) Use all the technical excuses you want, save two episodes the entire series has been forgettable so far.</p>
<p>This is not Whedon at the top of his game. It makes me think he peaked with Angel and FireFly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77431</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77431</guid>
		<description>I agree with squggleslash on the &quot;rumors&quot; effect on ratings. 99% of the viewers of Dollhouse (or any other show) have absolutely no idea what the ratings/status of the show is. In that regard, anything online is just one big echo chamber for the relatively few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with squggleslash on the &#8220;rumors&#8221; effect on ratings. 99% of the viewers of Dollhouse (or any other show) have absolutely no idea what the ratings/status of the show is. In that regard, anything online is just one big echo chamber for the relatively few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77428</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77428</guid>
		<description>FWIW I don&#039;t know anyone who refuses to watch someone on the basis that they heard it probably will be canceled.

What&#039;s hurting Dollhouse are:
- A concept many have massive issues with
- Five relatively poor initial episodes
- A relatively poor timeslot
- Being paired with All My Circuits followed by the even more dreadful (and, unlike T:SCC, virtually no audience synergism) Prison Break
- (This week only) a break in the schedule

Fix /all fix issues/ and Dollhouse would probably have respectable figures. But rumors of cancellation really have nothing to do with anything. They might impact advertiser&#039;s enthusiasm, but not audience enthusiasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW I don&#8217;t know anyone who refuses to watch someone on the basis that they heard it probably will be canceled.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s hurting Dollhouse are:<br />
- A concept many have massive issues with<br />
- Five relatively poor initial episodes<br />
- A relatively poor timeslot<br />
- Being paired with All My Circuits followed by the even more dreadful (and, unlike T:SCC, virtually no audience synergism) Prison Break<br />
- (This week only) a break in the schedule</p>
<p>Fix /all fix issues/ and Dollhouse would probably have respectable figures. But rumors of cancellation really have nothing to do with anything. They might impact advertiser&#8217;s enthusiasm, but not audience enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77412</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77412</guid>
		<description>FOX can afford a gamble in the spring, but does another fall where they are competing with NBC really seem like a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX can afford a gamble in the spring, but does another fall where they are competing with NBC really seem like a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77406</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77406</guid>
		<description>I would love to see a Fringe/Dollhouse pairing just to see what kinda legs Fringe has.  I&#039;m guessing not real good.  I&#039;d really like to see that.  Isn&#039;t that terrible?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see a Fringe/Dollhouse pairing just to see what kinda legs Fringe has.  I&#8217;m guessing not real good.  I&#8217;d really like to see that.  Isn&#8217;t that terrible?  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffywrestling</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77404</link>
		<dc:creator>buffywrestling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77404</guid>
		<description>Not about quaility; it&#039;s about ratings. Robert, maybe you guys should make a big blinking banner or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not about quaility; it&#8217;s about ratings. Robert, maybe you guys should make a big blinking banner or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77403</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77403</guid>
		<description>Robert, I couldn&#039;t understand the 50/50 a week ago, so I&#039;m not going to even guess on this one.  They&#039;re definitely considering options, and it would be a heck of a gamble to renew but if anyone can afford to gamble right now it&#039;s FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I couldn&#8217;t understand the 50/50 a week ago, so I&#8217;m not going to even guess on this one.  They&#8217;re definitely considering options, and it would be a heck of a gamble to renew but if anyone can afford to gamble right now it&#8217;s FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77400</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77400</guid>
		<description>While I like Eliza Dushku as an actress, she&#039;s proven again that she can&#039;t carry a show. She can be a supporting actor on a successful show like Buffy or Angel but that&#039;s it. If they expected Tahmoh Penikett to carry it they were sorely disappointed since to me he was pretty flat on Battlestar Galactica and wasn&#039;t a huge draw there. Too bad they didn&#039;t make it an ensemble show from the get go. Olivia Williams should have been the lead instead of Eliza since I consider her the best actor on the show and her character is way more interesting. The character of Sierra, Victor, and Mellie to me are way more interesting than the character of Echo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I like Eliza Dushku as an actress, she&#8217;s proven again that she can&#8217;t carry a show. She can be a supporting actor on a successful show like Buffy or Angel but that&#8217;s it. If they expected Tahmoh Penikett to carry it they were sorely disappointed since to me he was pretty flat on Battlestar Galactica and wasn&#8217;t a huge draw there. Too bad they didn&#8217;t make it an ensemble show from the get go. Olivia Williams should have been the lead instead of Eliza since I consider her the best actor on the show and her character is way more interesting. The character of Sierra, Victor, and Mellie to me are way more interesting than the character of Echo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffywrestling</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77398</link>
		<dc:creator>buffywrestling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77398</guid>
		<description>Nick C, I just can&#039;t visualize your scenario. It&#039;s really tempting to, mind but I just can&#039;t. It almost sounds like you are implying that Fox is going out of it&#039;s way to make round DOLLHOUSE fit into a square slot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C, I just can&#8217;t visualize your scenario. It&#8217;s really tempting to, mind but I just can&#8217;t. It almost sounds like you are implying that Fox is going out of it&#8217;s way to make round DOLLHOUSE fit into a square slot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77397</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77397</guid>
		<description>and to be clear, people at FOX may be &quot;mulling it over&quot;, but when the mulling is done, it&#039;s not coming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and to be clear, people at FOX may be &#8220;mulling it over&#8221;, but when the mulling is done, it&#8217;s not coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77396</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77396</guid>
		<description>Nick C, there is no chance that Dollhouse is coming back now.  Talking about hypothetically pairing it with Fringe is wacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C, there is no chance that Dollhouse is coming back now.  Talking about hypothetically pairing it with Fringe is wacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77395</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77395</guid>
		<description>Fringe/Dollhouse strikes me as a very strong possibility of a repeat of TSCC/Prison Break on Mondays last fall. For some reason I doubt FOX would want a repeat of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fringe/Dollhouse strikes me as a very strong possibility of a repeat of TSCC/Prison Break on Mondays last fall. For some reason I doubt FOX would want a repeat of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-7/#comment-77394</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77394</guid>
		<description>wiesengrund, I&#039;d have to think they&#039;d seriously consider pairing the two of them if they were serious about bringing the show back.  If they&#039;re sure that FRINGE has a strong base now and can live without a huge lead in, it&#039;s worth a gamble to have it as a lead in.  DOLLHOUSE imho is hurt more by the wide spread belief the show is in trouble that has been around since before it ever aired.  If FOX renews it, in my opinion it would take a bold move like saying &quot;we like it, we&#039;re sticking behind it, and to show how much we like the product they&#039;re delivering now we&#039;re putting it behind last season&#039;s most successful new show.&quot;

I doubt it would happen, and would place it as an extremely unlikely event.  That doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t consider it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wiesengrund, I&#8217;d have to think they&#8217;d seriously consider pairing the two of them if they were serious about bringing the show back.  If they&#8217;re sure that FRINGE has a strong base now and can live without a huge lead in, it&#8217;s worth a gamble to have it as a lead in.  DOLLHOUSE imho is hurt more by the wide spread belief the show is in trouble that has been around since before it ever aired.  If FOX renews it, in my opinion it would take a bold move like saying &#8220;we like it, we&#8217;re sticking behind it, and to show how much we like the product they&#8217;re delivering now we&#8217;re putting it behind last season&#8217;s most successful new show.&#8221;</p>
<p>I doubt it would happen, and would place it as an extremely unlikely event.  That doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiesengrund</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77393</link>
		<dc:creator>wiesengrund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77393</guid>
		<description>Would be FRINGE be such a possibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be FRINGE be such a possibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77392</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77392</guid>
		<description>Well it means multiple things for one.  I suspected a drop because of data FOX had acquired showing that PRISON BREAK was likely a worse lead in (not due to PRISON BREAK being bad, but due to less likely hood of retention) than TSCC.  So FOX was able to prove that, and what they&#039;re likely thinking about right now is can they pair it with something that will work with DOLLHOUSE and if they can&#039;t the show is canceled.

I say that because they&#039;re already seriously considering renewal despite bad numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it means multiple things for one.  I suspected a drop because of data FOX had acquired showing that PRISON BREAK was likely a worse lead in (not due to PRISON BREAK being bad, but due to less likely hood of retention) than TSCC.  So FOX was able to prove that, and what they&#8217;re likely thinking about right now is can they pair it with something that will work with DOLLHOUSE and if they can&#8217;t the show is canceled.</p>
<p>I say that because they&#8217;re already seriously considering renewal despite bad numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77391</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77391</guid>
		<description>Anil, sadly on Saturday and Sunday mornings, we are usually mere barnacles relying on the kindness of other hulls (we don&#039;t usually receive the info directly on the weekends, but we do Mon-Fri mornings).  Since I haven&#039;t seen anything with demo numbers yet, I haven&#039;t posted anything yet :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anil, sadly on Saturday and Sunday mornings, we are usually mere barnacles relying on the kindness of other hulls (we don&#8217;t usually receive the info directly on the weekends, but we do Mon-Fri mornings).  Since I haven&#8217;t seen anything with demo numbers yet, I haven&#8217;t posted anything yet <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77390</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77390</guid>
		<description>Come on where r the ratings already? its 1pm. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on where r the ratings already? its 1pm. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77389</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77389</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess that&#039;s it, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess that&#8217;s it, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffywrestling</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77388</link>
		<dc:creator>buffywrestling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77388</guid>
		<description>Damn. Low for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn. Low for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77386</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77386</guid>
		<description>I heard 1.2 for PRISON BREAK, and 1.1 for DOLLHOUSE.  I haven&#039;t seen anything though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard 1.2 for PRISON BREAK, and 1.1 for DOLLHOUSE.  I haven&#8217;t seen anything though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77385</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77385</guid>
		<description>Oh, and it looks like Prison Break did better than Dollhouse in total audience, with a 2.1 vs 1.9. If that holds up for the demos, how low did Dollhouse sink???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and it looks like Prison Break did better than Dollhouse in total audience, with a 2.1 vs 1.9. If that holds up for the demos, how low did Dollhouse sink???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77384</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77384</guid>
		<description>JustTuneIn, network panels are basically surveys done of people who watch the show.  They get them to sit in a room with a device and watch the show.  Then they are allowed to fill out comment sheets, etc.  It varies somewhat based on who is doing the research, but that&#039;s the basic gist, and panels are done for pilots as well as multiple episodes through a season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JustTuneIn, network panels are basically surveys done of people who watch the show.  They get them to sit in a room with a device and watch the show.  Then they are allowed to fill out comment sheets, etc.  It varies somewhat based on who is doing the research, but that&#8217;s the basic gist, and panels are done for pilots as well as multiple episodes through a season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77383</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77383</guid>
		<description>it&#039;ll definately be cancelled now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;ll definately be cancelled now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77382</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77382</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Yeah, the 1.9 is HH. FOX averaged 1.1, so the combo is definitely worse than the TSCC/Dollhouse combo, but I guess we&#039;ll have to wait a bit to find out what each show got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Yeah, the 1.9 is HH. FOX averaged 1.1, so the combo is definitely worse than the TSCC/Dollhouse combo, but I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait a bit to find out what each show got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77381</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77381</guid>
		<description>that is indeed a Household ratings. I&#039;m still waiting for something with 18-49. haven&#039;t seen it anywhere yet but I think we can rule out a 1.6 or better ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is indeed a Household ratings. I&#8217;m still waiting for something with 18-49. haven&#8217;t seen it anywhere yet but I think we can rule out a 1.6 or better <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77380</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77380</guid>
		<description>Julia : http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2009-4-25-tv-ratings-fox-friday-dramas-droop-as-cbs-rolls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia : <a href="http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2009-4-25-tv-ratings-fox-friday-dramas-droop-as-cbs-rolls" rel="nofollow">http://www.hitfix.com/articles/2009-4-25-tv-ratings-fox-friday-dramas-droop-as-cbs-rolls</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77378</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77378</guid>
		<description>T, wherever you found that, did it mention demo numbers? (1.9 for 2.99 mil is more likely the HH rating.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T, wherever you found that, did it mention demo numbers? (1.9 for 2.99 mil is more likely the HH rating.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTunedIn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77376</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTunedIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77376</guid>
		<description>I guess probably saying &quot;noone&quot; likes Eliza is over doing it.  I wasn&#039;t talking about attractivness though.  I was talking more about as an actress.  

I just find the actor who plays Sierra more enjoyable to watch, not painful.  

These Panels that you were talking about, what are they?  What episodes are they based on?  Or do you mean people who write on the boards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess probably saying &#8220;noone&#8221; likes Eliza is over doing it.  I wasn&#8217;t talking about attractivness though.  I was talking more about as an actress.  </p>
<p>I just find the actor who plays Sierra more enjoyable to watch, not painful.  </p>
<p>These Panels that you were talking about, what are they?  What episodes are they based on?  Or do you mean people who write on the boards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/24/dollhouse-returns-how-will-it-do/17355/comment-page-6/#comment-77375</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17355#comment-77375</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse,&quot; off last week, did a 1.9/3 in its return, averaging a series-low 2.99 million viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse,&#8221; off last week, did a 1.9/3 in its return, averaging a series-low 2.99 million viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

