<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Draft on ESPN reaches record total audience of 36.7 million viewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-79366</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-79366</guid>
		<description>non-duplicated, at least six minutes.   The first round (4 hour duration) averaged 5.058 million. The Sunday coverage, (9 hours and 36 minutes in duration) averaged 1.935 million.  Those are just the ESPN numbers, and not ESPN2, which also offered some coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>non-duplicated, at least six minutes.   The first round (4 hour duration) averaged 5.058 million. The Sunday coverage, (9 hours and 36 minutes in duration) averaged 1.935 million.  Those are just the ESPN numbers, and not ESPN2, which also offered some coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doghouse Reilly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-79363</link>
		<dc:creator>Doghouse Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-79363</guid>
		<description>So is this viewers who watched at least -- or just -- six minutes? Non-duplicated viewers? Or just the same 3.67 million viewers tuning in ten times, six minutes at a time, over the course of the 15 hours?

These &quot;millions of people tuned in to at least part of&quot; numbers are always a bit suspect but in this case, with no average viewership stated, it is practically meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this viewers who watched at least &#8212; or just &#8212; six minutes? Non-duplicated viewers? Or just the same 3.67 million viewers tuning in ten times, six minutes at a time, over the course of the 15 hours?</p>
<p>These &#8220;millions of people tuned in to at least part of&#8221; numbers are always a bit suspect but in this case, with no average viewership stated, it is practically meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-79045</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-79045</guid>
		<description>no big deal. it helped that the draft took the entire weekend. day one was cool, but day two is a nightmare. i couldn&#039;t watch no more than 30 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no big deal. it helped that the draft took the entire weekend. day one was cool, but day two is a nightmare. i couldn&#8217;t watch no more than 30 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-79044</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-79044</guid>
		<description>Ded, Here on the east coast it was the first really warm weekend in a long time.  Plus you also had the baseball to contend with Yankees/Red Sox.  I haven&#039;t looked at but I&#039;m guessing the NBA playoff numbers are bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ded, Here on the east coast it was the first really warm weekend in a long time.  Plus you also had the baseball to contend with Yankees/Red Sox.  I haven&#8217;t looked at but I&#8217;m guessing the NBA playoff numbers are bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-79023</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-79023</guid>
		<description>it makes sense that people in Cleveland would watch a lot of the draft because the browns kept trading down in round 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it makes sense that people in Cleveland would watch a lot of the draft because the browns kept trading down in round 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ded</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/04/28/nfl-draft-on-espn-reaches-record-total-audience-of-367-million-viewers/17588/comment-page-1/#comment-78978</link>
		<dc:creator>ded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=17588#comment-78978</guid>
		<description>At a first glance, those highest rated market cities seem to have taken a pretty big economic punch in the gut.  (at least, worse than the rest of us.) ??  Or maybe there is just more to do on the weekend in the east and west coast markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a first glance, those highest rated market cities seem to have taken a pretty big economic punch in the gut.  (at least, worse than the rest of us.) ??  Or maybe there is just more to do on the weekend in the east and west coast markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

