<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings Week 32: Broadcast 93; Cable/Satellite 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85914</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85914</guid>
		<description>Ani, too bad that Dollhouse&#039;s competition isn&#039;t the universe of 14,000 total cable and broadcast shows, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/06/theres-no-drama-at-all-in-foxs-renewal-announcements/18201&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;but the current 15 scripted Fox broadcast shows, of which it is 14th&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ani, too bad that Dollhouse&#8217;s competition isn&#8217;t the universe of 14,000 total cable and broadcast shows, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/06/theres-no-drama-at-all-in-foxs-renewal-announcements/18201" rel="nofollow">but the current 15 scripted Fox broadcast shows, of which it is 14th</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AniMatsuri</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85900</link>
		<dc:creator>AniMatsuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85900</guid>
		<description>With over 14,000+ programs out there, Dollhouse makes the top 100 at 87.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With over 14,000+ programs out there, Dollhouse makes the top 100 at 87.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85703</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85703</guid>
		<description>DD, CBS does *skew* old. That is if we were looking at a list ordered by average viewers, instead of adults 18-49, CBS would have even *more* shows in the top quarter of the list.

Note how far ahead in average viewers CBS is this season to date chart, yet their 18-49 average is behind Fox and much closer to ABC and NBC.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/07/fox-still-tied-with-cbs-for-adults-25-54-leads-other-age-demos/18289
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD, CBS does *skew* old. That is if we were looking at a list ordered by average viewers, instead of adults 18-49, CBS would have even *more* shows in the top quarter of the list.</p>
<p>Note how far ahead in average viewers CBS is this season to date chart, yet their 18-49 average is behind Fox and much closer to ABC and NBC.<br />
<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/07/fox-still-tied-with-cbs-for-adults-25-54-leads-other-age-demos/18289" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/07/fox-still-tied-with-cbs-for-adults-25-54-leads-other-age-demos/18289</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85685</link>
		<dc:creator>DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85685</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to see all those CBS intials in the top quarter of this list. Is the perception that CBS skews extremely old a fallacy or was this just a very uncharacteristic week for them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see all those CBS intials in the top quarter of this list. Is the perception that CBS skews extremely old a fallacy or was this just a very uncharacteristic week for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85646</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85646</guid>
		<description>Chuck did better than Law and Order,My name is Earl,Parks and Recreation,Medium &amp; Southland!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck did better than Law and Order,My name is Earl,Parks and Recreation,Medium &amp; Southland!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanaticDestinyCalls</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85614</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanaticDestinyCalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85614</guid>
		<description>ABC/Survivor/AmazingRace Rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC/Survivor/AmazingRace Rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85600</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85600</guid>
		<description>CP, Probably because the network is unlikely to make a decision based on one week of data rather than the whole season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CP, Probably because the network is unlikely to make a decision based on one week of data rather than the whole season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/11/tv-ratings-week-32-broadcast-93-cablesatellite-7/18441/comment-page-1/#comment-85597</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18441#comment-85597</guid>
		<description>If Chuck is ranked 39, over shows like Lie To Me and Medium, why wouldn&#039;t it be brought back?  Good for WWE to be ranked fairly high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chuck is ranked 39, over shows like Lie To Me and Medium, why wouldn&#8217;t it be brought back?  Good for WWE to be ranked fairly high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

