<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lie to Me renewed, next up, Dollhouse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87090</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87090</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify, I meant that Remote Free TV was still in effect for *this* season. Next season, I have no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify, I meant that Remote Free TV was still in effect for *this* season. Next season, I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87086</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87086</guid>
		<description>????, I&#039;ve heard RTV is dead and then heard just today it wasn&#039;t.  I know the WSJ had a blurb about it&#039;s supposed cancellation but they couldn&#039;t quote anyone.  It&#039;s likely the same thing I heard Wednesday.

Abrams wants RTV for FRINGE, so I think it will live on for FRINGE.  If DOLLHOUSE is coming back then RTV may well live on there too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>????, I&#8217;ve heard RTV is dead and then heard just today it wasn&#8217;t.  I know the WSJ had a blurb about it&#8217;s supposed cancellation but they couldn&#8217;t quote anyone.  It&#8217;s likely the same thing I heard Wednesday.</p>
<p>Abrams wants RTV for FRINGE, so I think it will live on for FRINGE.  If DOLLHOUSE is coming back then RTV may well live on there too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87085</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87085</guid>
		<description>Vee, afaik Fringe and Dollhouse are both still on the Remote Free TV plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vee, afaik Fringe and Dollhouse are both still on the Remote Free TV plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87082</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87082</guid>
		<description>I wish you people wouldn&#039;t call Dollhouse - DH.  I keep reading DH as desperate housewives.

My extremely limited understanding is remotefree tv is gone completely from FOX all ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you people wouldn&#8217;t call Dollhouse &#8211; DH.  I keep reading DH as desperate housewives.</p>
<p>My extremely limited understanding is remotefree tv is gone completely from FOX all ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87013</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87013</guid>
		<description>To clarify, it&#039;s not that I think Fridays is a &quot;dead zone&quot;. Dollhouse got low ratings because of the problems of the show. although debuting on Fridays didn&#039;t help. 

However, a REVAMPED Dollhouse that addresses that might do better on a different night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, it&#8217;s not that I think Fridays is a &#8220;dead zone&#8221;. Dollhouse got low ratings because of the problems of the show. although debuting on Fridays didn&#8217;t help. </p>
<p>However, a REVAMPED Dollhouse that addresses that might do better on a different night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87011</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87011</guid>
		<description>OK. I&#039;d still like to see those two shows paired. If they are, then Dollhouse will be moved off Fridays as well, which I think is a good idea despite its low ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I&#8217;d still like to see those two shows paired. If they are, then Dollhouse will be moved off Fridays as well, which I think is a good idea despite its low ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87010</link>
		<dc:creator>????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87010</guid>
		<description>Richard, 

I promise you that HT will most definitely NOT air on Fris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, </p>
<p>I promise you that HT will most definitely NOT air on Fris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-87004</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-87004</guid>
		<description>Well, I can&#039;t complain if DH is brought back. My guess is that&#039;s why they let Whedon pitch his season 2 last week. If he pitched a significantly revamped version, one that corrects the mistakes made in season 1 (or they at least think it does), they could just see that making some sense if the show is profitable and they can find room for it in the schedule on Fridays or elsewhere.

I could see them pairing Human Target with Dollhouse. Human Target has been tried and failed before. So I can see them hooking these two potential losers up on Fridays as another shot at &quot;Friday Science Fiction&quot; night (even though Human Target is not exactly sci-fi, it&#039;s &quot;comic book&quot;, so close enough for horseshoes.)

Personally I think if they do that, they should get both shows OFF Fridays and take the risk of both bombing on a more important night. Who knows? It just might work and both shows might get better ratings being off Fridays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can&#8217;t complain if DH is brought back. My guess is that&#8217;s why they let Whedon pitch his season 2 last week. If he pitched a significantly revamped version, one that corrects the mistakes made in season 1 (or they at least think it does), they could just see that making some sense if the show is profitable and they can find room for it in the schedule on Fridays or elsewhere.</p>
<p>I could see them pairing Human Target with Dollhouse. Human Target has been tried and failed before. So I can see them hooking these two potential losers up on Fridays as another shot at &#8220;Friday Science Fiction&#8221; night (even though Human Target is not exactly sci-fi, it&#8217;s &#8220;comic book&#8221;, so close enough for horseshoes.)</p>
<p>Personally I think if they do that, they should get both shows OFF Fridays and take the risk of both bombing on a more important night. Who knows? It just might work and both shows might get better ratings being off Fridays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-5/#comment-86996</link>
		<dc:creator>????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86996</guid>
		<description>Nick, btw the news is that DH *may* come back, it hasn&#039;t been confirmed. RTV, on the other hand, is dead. This has already been reported.

Also, FOX has picked up three dramas for the fall (Glee, Human Target, Past Life, and it&#039;s being reported that Maggie Hill may be picked up for midseasn). What would be paired with DH in the fall? An hour of reality tv? Sounds strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, btw the news is that DH *may* come back, it hasn&#8217;t been confirmed. RTV, on the other hand, is dead. This has already been reported.</p>
<p>Also, FOX has picked up three dramas for the fall (Glee, Human Target, Past Life, and it&#8217;s being reported that Maggie Hill may be picked up for midseasn). What would be paired with DH in the fall? An hour of reality tv? Sounds strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86994</link>
		<dc:creator>????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86994</guid>
		<description>Bill and Robert, why do you think Nick C. is a real insider? I think you guys are getting hoodwinked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill and Robert, why do you think Nick C. is a real insider? I think you guys are getting hoodwinked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86896</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86896</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re working out the details now.  It&#039;s crazy.  I believe it&#039;s coming back with REMOTE FREE TV intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re working out the details now.  It&#8217;s crazy.  I believe it&#8217;s coming back with REMOTE FREE TV intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86876</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86876</guid>
		<description>This is so exciting!  Maybe next season, if it is indeed picked up, all of those people who gave up on Dollhouse because they thought it was doomed will give it a second chance. This makes me wish that I preordered the DVD version rather than the Blu-ray version, so that I could convince all of my friends to watch it.  :D

One thing I&#039;ve learned about Joss&#039;s work is that it&#039;s almost always better when watched as a marathon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so exciting!  Maybe next season, if it is indeed picked up, all of those people who gave up on Dollhouse because they thought it was doomed will give it a second chance. This makes me wish that I preordered the DVD version rather than the Blu-ray version, so that I could convince all of my friends to watch it.  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ve learned about Joss&#8217;s work is that it&#8217;s almost always better when watched as a marathon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon L</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86829</guid>
		<description>Lol at the fake Nick C. That is so sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol at the fake Nick C. That is so sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86822</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86822</guid>
		<description>@Nick C, On Dollhouse,  Wow x2 8O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick C, On Dollhouse,  Wow x2 <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt='8O' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86815</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86815</guid>
		<description>The real Nick C this time?

Holy crap that&#039;s good news if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real Nick C this time?</p>
<p>Holy crap that&#8217;s good news if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86799</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86799</guid>
		<description>Wow.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86798</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86798</guid>
		<description>DOLLHOUSE looks picked up.  FOX said they&#039;d do it for a certain license fee, and FOX Studios would be stupid not to do it.  So I figure that it&#039;s renewed.  Why?  Profit, not ratings.  Also they may be hoping for good word of mouth over the summer.  The last episodes didn&#039;t suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOLLHOUSE looks picked up.  FOX said they&#8217;d do it for a certain license fee, and FOX Studios would be stupid not to do it.  So I figure that it&#8217;s renewed.  Why?  Profit, not ratings.  Also they may be hoping for good word of mouth over the summer.  The last episodes didn&#8217;t suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86782</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86782</guid>
		<description>^^^^ That Nick C is an imposter TSCC fan boy (you don&#039;t think we can see the details in the comments?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^^ That Nick C is an imposter TSCC fan boy (you don&#8217;t think we can see the details in the comments?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86781</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86781</guid>
		<description>The outlook for TSCC is better now than it was before Dollhouse took a dive. I know everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The outlook for TSCC is better now than it was before Dollhouse took a dive. I know everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86769</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86769</guid>
		<description>Joshua the Dollhouse/Damages comparison isn’t an especially good one for various reasons most noticeably because Damages sticks around on FX for a couple of reasons 

1) Glen Close and other big name members of the cast.
2) The critical acclaim.
3) The awards. 

Dollhouse doesn’t have any of those things going for it, Damages is FX’s big prestige show that gets their name out their as a quality network that viewers should check out, that’s all important for cable channels. Monks’ critical acclaim and awards were a huge part of building up the USA original programming brand for example. 

In general terms though I didn’t say Dollhouse’s numbers were bad for cable I just said they weren’t fantastic. Networks like USA and TNT aren’t going to jump at the chance to bring Dollhouse on board because the numbers aren’t strong enough and they’d likely fall should the move to cable be made. Whereas for the smaller cable networks the numbers and critical buzz aren’t big enough to warrant the price tag or the stigma of picking up a show that wasn’t successful on broadcast. More and more cable networks want to present themselves as an alternative to broadcast picking up their cancelled scraps isn’t the best way to do that.

As it stands shows like Dollhouse and Terminator just don’t have enough going for them to make cable networks interested in picking them up. The obvious upside just isn’t there. Its not like they’d be saving shows that pick up awards or that the critics absolutely love. Personally I’d guess that if none of the cable networks were interested in stepping in to pick-up Firefly then none of them are going to be interested in Dollhouse either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua the Dollhouse/Damages comparison isn’t an especially good one for various reasons most noticeably because Damages sticks around on FX for a couple of reasons </p>
<p>1) Glen Close and other big name members of the cast.<br />
2) The critical acclaim.<br />
3) The awards. </p>
<p>Dollhouse doesn’t have any of those things going for it, Damages is FX’s big prestige show that gets their name out their as a quality network that viewers should check out, that’s all important for cable channels. Monks’ critical acclaim and awards were a huge part of building up the USA original programming brand for example. </p>
<p>In general terms though I didn’t say Dollhouse’s numbers were bad for cable I just said they weren’t fantastic. Networks like USA and TNT aren’t going to jump at the chance to bring Dollhouse on board because the numbers aren’t strong enough and they’d likely fall should the move to cable be made. Whereas for the smaller cable networks the numbers and critical buzz aren’t big enough to warrant the price tag or the stigma of picking up a show that wasn’t successful on broadcast. More and more cable networks want to present themselves as an alternative to broadcast picking up their cancelled scraps isn’t the best way to do that.</p>
<p>As it stands shows like Dollhouse and Terminator just don’t have enough going for them to make cable networks interested in picking them up. The obvious upside just isn’t there. Its not like they’d be saving shows that pick up awards or that the critics absolutely love. Personally I’d guess that if none of the cable networks were interested in stepping in to pick-up Firefly then none of them are going to be interested in Dollhouse either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86720</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86720</guid>
		<description>John: &quot;if you didnt like the show WHY DID YOU WATCH IT????&quot;

Two reasons.

1) I liked season one. It had a few problems (the high school crap, some other minor things).

2) I liked the idea of a Terminator TV show. I kept hoping Friedman would pull it out sometime in season two, once it became apparent there were problems and the ratings weren&#039;t good. Which is why I spent time criticizing the show and hoping the writers would pick up on the problems and fix them. Zack Stentz knew what I was saying since both of us were posting on the Sarah Connor Society forums - that&#039;s HOW my name ended up in an episode of the show! Instead, Friedman made it much worse in the back nine, although he did pick up the pace slightly.

Now I&#039;m just pissed off that one of my favorite shows and a show that had enormous potential to be a high water mark for sci-fi on broadcast TV for the next decade was instead run into the toilet and canceled.

Do you get a clue now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: &#8220;if you didnt like the show WHY DID YOU WATCH IT????&#8221;</p>
<p>Two reasons.</p>
<p>1) I liked season one. It had a few problems (the high school crap, some other minor things).</p>
<p>2) I liked the idea of a Terminator TV show. I kept hoping Friedman would pull it out sometime in season two, once it became apparent there were problems and the ratings weren&#8217;t good. Which is why I spent time criticizing the show and hoping the writers would pick up on the problems and fix them. Zack Stentz knew what I was saying since both of us were posting on the Sarah Connor Society forums &#8211; that&#8217;s HOW my name ended up in an episode of the show! Instead, Friedman made it much worse in the back nine, although he did pick up the pace slightly.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m just pissed off that one of my favorite shows and a show that had enormous potential to be a high water mark for sci-fi on broadcast TV for the next decade was instead run into the toilet and canceled.</p>
<p>Do you get a clue now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86677</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86677</guid>
		<description>much thx for explaining
appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much thx for explaining<br />
appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua K.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86698</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86698</guid>
		<description>Ugh.  Fridays fail.  When Wifeswap is getting super amounts of viewers, you really have to question what type of audience is tuning in.  Seriously, I agree with the people declaring Friday night should be a &quot;reality night.&quot;  That way people who don&#039;t have real lives can usurp the lives of those who are willing to whore out their privacy for their 15 minutes...  Well, actually I guess they&#039;re getting 60 minutes + press if they&#039;re total a-holes or &quot;unfortunate&quot; in some regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  Fridays fail.  When Wifeswap is getting super amounts of viewers, you really have to question what type of audience is tuning in.  Seriously, I agree with the people declaring Friday night should be a &#8220;reality night.&#8221;  That way people who don&#8217;t have real lives can usurp the lives of those who are willing to whore out their privacy for their 15 minutes&#8230;  Well, actually I guess they&#8217;re getting 60 minutes + press if they&#8217;re total a-holes or &#8220;unfortunate&#8221; in some regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua K.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86697</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86697</guid>
		<description>@Alex

How are Dollhouse&#039;s numbers not good enough for cable when Damages (whose 2nd season finale topped at only roughly 1 million TOTAL viewers, if I remember my numbers correctly) got picked up for a third season...and with a heavyweight like Glenn Close as the lead actress, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re paying peanuts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex</p>
<p>How are Dollhouse&#8217;s numbers not good enough for cable when Damages (whose 2nd season finale topped at only roughly 1 million TOTAL viewers, if I remember my numbers correctly) got picked up for a third season&#8230;and with a heavyweight like Glenn Close as the lead actress, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re paying peanuts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86670</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86670</guid>
		<description>Chet the majority of network shows are too expensive to then move to cable, unless the stars take paycuts and the production budgets are slashed. Kings for example would never work on Sci-Fi because its just too expensive for cable. The reason it isn&#039;t worthwhile to switch shows like TSCC or Dollhouse to cable is because even on cable their numbers aren&#039;t fantastic (and they&#039;d likely lose viewers with the jump) and chances are they&#039;re too expensive to work - that  may not be completely true of Dollhouse, which I know has been comparatively cheap (in terms of network dramas) to produce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chet the majority of network shows are too expensive to then move to cable, unless the stars take paycuts and the production budgets are slashed. Kings for example would never work on Sci-Fi because its just too expensive for cable. The reason it isn&#8217;t worthwhile to switch shows like TSCC or Dollhouse to cable is because even on cable their numbers aren&#8217;t fantastic (and they&#8217;d likely lose viewers with the jump) and chances are they&#8217;re too expensive to work &#8211; that  may not be completely true of Dollhouse, which I know has been comparatively cheap (in terms of network dramas) to produce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86665</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86665</guid>
		<description>chet - because everyone knows that science fiction fans are nerds who live in their parent&#039;s basements and stay at home on Friday nights rather than going out on dates?

More seriously, there&#039;s no way to put every show on the &quot;right night&quot;. Something has to be shown on Fridays. Fox reportedly wanted to make Fridays a &quot;Science Fiction night&quot; in an attempt to brand it and build up a particular audience. For a variety of reasons, that may be flawed (just look at the effect of major blockbuster movies coming out, which are always opening on... Fridays), but it&#039;s not much worse than any other strategy. The alternative is probably showing repeats, which means two hours less of original programming per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chet &#8211; because everyone knows that science fiction fans are nerds who live in their parent&#8217;s basements and stay at home on Friday nights rather than going out on dates?</p>
<p>More seriously, there&#8217;s no way to put every show on the &#8220;right night&#8221;. Something has to be shown on Fridays. Fox reportedly wanted to make Fridays a &#8220;Science Fiction night&#8221; in an attempt to brand it and build up a particular audience. For a variety of reasons, that may be flawed (just look at the effect of major blockbuster movies coming out, which are always opening on&#8230; Fridays), but it&#8217;s not much worse than any other strategy. The alternative is probably showing repeats, which means two hours less of original programming per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86664</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86664</guid>
		<description>Like I said Nick, Dollhouse has to be making some serious dollars for them to be working at bringing it back because there’s nothing else there and given how low the show has fallen there’s got to be some sense of rethinking its profit margins at this point and that will only get worse if Remote Free is gone. They have to be seeing pretty sizable returns to really want to make this work rather than go with something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said Nick, Dollhouse has to be making some serious dollars for them to be working at bringing it back because there’s nothing else there and given how low the show has fallen there’s got to be some sense of rethinking its profit margins at this point and that will only get worse if Remote Free is gone. They have to be seeing pretty sizable returns to really want to make this work rather than go with something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86661</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86661</guid>
		<description>sry i ment
i dont expect tscc to end up on USA as the networks are diffrent
but maybe it could be on FX
NBC has so many options- kings could be on scifi for example
i have seen shows like bionic woman on scifi-but they have been lame half hearted attempts in bad timeslots with little advertising/pr so they die
i guess im asking why isnt it worthwhile to do so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sry i ment<br />
i dont expect tscc to end up on USA as the networks are diffrent<br />
but maybe it could be on FX<br />
NBC has so many options- kings could be on scifi for example<br />
i have seen shows like bionic woman on scifi-but they have been lame half hearted attempts in bad timeslots with little advertising/pr so they die<br />
i guess im asking why isnt it worthwhile to do so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86659</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86659</guid>
		<description>can someone explain this to me?
first i think TSCC and Dollhouse r dead-
that said why would a network put shows designed to get a yopunger audience
on a friday-when most aforementioned age groups will be mostlikely not in front of their TV?
Also Since these shows are paid for anyway
like say better off ted-or kings-why not put them on another network and see if they do better? i realize they may not want to cross networks but like putting kings on USA which is owned by the same parent company etc
why isnt this done-arent the shows paid for-isnt it worthwhile to try to find them a place they might fit somewhere else?rather than cann the show and suck up a loss?
am i off my nut?
if this has been discussed elsewhere plz link it -i havnt found anything that answers this completely
plz bear with me im new to this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone explain this to me?<br />
first i think TSCC and Dollhouse r dead-<br />
that said why would a network put shows designed to get a yopunger audience<br />
on a friday-when most aforementioned age groups will be mostlikely not in front of their TV?<br />
Also Since these shows are paid for anyway<br />
like say better off ted-or kings-why not put them on another network and see if they do better? i realize they may not want to cross networks but like putting kings on USA which is owned by the same parent company etc<br />
why isnt this done-arent the shows paid for-isnt it worthwhile to try to find them a place they might fit somewhere else?rather than cann the show and suck up a loss?<br />
am i off my nut?<br />
if this has been discussed elsewhere plz link it -i havnt found anything that answers this completely<br />
plz bear with me im new to this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86657</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86657</guid>
		<description>Nick C - I&#039;ve noticed that too. Several media outlets, from science fiction portal sites like io to Salon.com (which had it as a lead story for either Friday or Saturday, I forget), have over the last couple of weeks suddenly made a big deal about Dollhouse.

I don&#039;t think critical acclaim is enough to save it, but I suspect it helps a little, if only in making the schedulers recognize it has potential to do better than it&#039;s doing. It&#039;s not as if Dollhouse has had many breaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C &#8211; I&#8217;ve noticed that too. Several media outlets, from science fiction portal sites like io to Salon.com (which had it as a lead story for either Friday or Saturday, I forget), have over the last couple of weeks suddenly made a big deal about Dollhouse.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think critical acclaim is enough to save it, but I suspect it helps a little, if only in making the schedulers recognize it has potential to do better than it&#8217;s doing. It&#8217;s not as if Dollhouse has had many breaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-4/#comment-86655</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86655</guid>
		<description>Richard Steven Hack

Why did u watch TSCC? everytime i see ur comments on any page u somewho bring TSCC into it always a bad comment about the show about how crap it was. Yes the show had problesm and yes it had a few bad episodes but lots of shows have crap episodes lost and Fringe come to mind alot. 

if you didnt like the show WHY DID YOU WATCH IT????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Steven Hack</p>
<p>Why did u watch TSCC? everytime i see ur comments on any page u somewho bring TSCC into it always a bad comment about the show about how crap it was. Yes the show had problesm and yes it had a few bad episodes but lots of shows have crap episodes lost and Fringe come to mind alot. </p>
<p>if you didnt like the show WHY DID YOU WATCH IT????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86651</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86651</guid>
		<description>godfather, I&#039;d say the majority of shows are canceled without any notice or anything to the media or public.  

Alex, it&#039;s called &quot;profit.&quot;  Since DOLLHOUSE is profitable, then it makes sense to try and see if you can fix the problems and go into season 2 and make more money.  The show has been all about &quot;bad news,&quot; since before it launched.  Going with a season 2 would theoretically say that FOX believes in the creative direction of the show more than the Media really let on.  That could change it to a good vibe by season 2 premier.  The Media seem to have changed their tune about the quality of the show as well.

Profit is the only reason to renew it, because ratings say can it and don&#039;t look back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>godfather, I&#8217;d say the majority of shows are canceled without any notice or anything to the media or public.  </p>
<p>Alex, it&#8217;s called &#8220;profit.&#8221;  Since DOLLHOUSE is profitable, then it makes sense to try and see if you can fix the problems and go into season 2 and make more money.  The show has been all about &#8220;bad news,&#8221; since before it launched.  Going with a season 2 would theoretically say that FOX believes in the creative direction of the show more than the Media really let on.  That could change it to a good vibe by season 2 premier.  The Media seem to have changed their tune about the quality of the show as well.</p>
<p>Profit is the only reason to renew it, because ratings say can it and don&#8217;t look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86645</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86645</guid>
		<description>A pick-up for Lie To Me isn’t surprising but the new show runner is an interesting choice. I like it and on the whole I think it’s a decent show of confidence from Fox when it comes to developing the show. We’ll see how it pans out next year. 

The Dollhouse rumours continue to be incredibly weird to me and I’m not reading anything into them. Personally I don’t think the shows been anywhere near strong enough creatively to warrant a pick-up let alone its ratings performance, it has to be making some serious dollars for Fox to make this happen. As it is I’d prefer Fox (and Whedon) cut their loses with Dollhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pick-up for Lie To Me isn’t surprising but the new show runner is an interesting choice. I like it and on the whole I think it’s a decent show of confidence from Fox when it comes to developing the show. We’ll see how it pans out next year. </p>
<p>The Dollhouse rumours continue to be incredibly weird to me and I’m not reading anything into them. Personally I don’t think the shows been anywhere near strong enough creatively to warrant a pick-up let alone its ratings performance, it has to be making some serious dollars for Fox to make this happen. As it is I’d prefer Fox (and Whedon) cut their loses with Dollhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LR</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86636</link>
		<dc:creator>LR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86636</guid>
		<description>Unless my memory is way off, didn&#039;t Tru Calling even do better than Dollhouse is doing ratings wise?

Even if Dollhouse was a great show, it will never do numbers to pleas Fox. Buffy nor Angel would have survived on Fox either.  They are too niche.

Dollhouse is more like a cable show IMO...but really it is more like a half baked brainstorm session.  It reminds me of the group project in school that had the nugget of an idea, but was tossed together in three hours on a Sunday night before it was due.


As for Lie to Me, there is a lot of potential there, but the creator of The Shield.....? Seems like an odd mix.  They could take the show in a number of directions without screwing up the core concept. I think Fox is smart to give it another whirl and maybe tweak it a bit.  It will be interesting to see what kind of mark Ryan makes on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless my memory is way off, didn&#8217;t Tru Calling even do better than Dollhouse is doing ratings wise?</p>
<p>Even if Dollhouse was a great show, it will never do numbers to pleas Fox. Buffy nor Angel would have survived on Fox either.  They are too niche.</p>
<p>Dollhouse is more like a cable show IMO&#8230;but really it is more like a half baked brainstorm session.  It reminds me of the group project in school that had the nugget of an idea, but was tossed together in three hours on a Sunday night before it was due.</p>
<p>As for Lie to Me, there is a lot of potential there, but the creator of The Shield&#8230;..? Seems like an odd mix.  They could take the show in a number of directions without screwing up the core concept. I think Fox is smart to give it another whirl and maybe tweak it a bit.  It will be interesting to see what kind of mark Ryan makes on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86585</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86585</guid>
		<description>RSH, I know the odds of TSSC returning are incredibly poor.  I&#039;ve said that repeatedly here.  Personally I hate relying on rumors from anyone and that&#039;s why I look for official news.  In terms of how I feel at the moment, it&#039;s as a baseball fan who&#039;s team is in the playoffs, game 7, down 5 runs and it&#039;s the bottom of the 9th. In other words, I have some hope, but it&#039;s hoping against hope because I know the show is done for all intents and purposes.  If that sounds irrational to you, fine, I&#039;m simply describing my state of mind.

If there&#039;s one thing about TSCC&#039;s fate that angers me, it&#039;s the way the cancellation news is being handled.  I simply do not understand what benefit FOX derives by stringing along fans and not telling them the show is over.  Life, Pushing Daisies, Eli Stone, Prison Break, and other cancelled shows all received their news before the Fall Upfront.  It amounts to giving fans hope where none should exist.  There&#039;s going to be a flood of email and letters regardless of when the cancellation news is announced.  So why wait?  Why torture fans?  Why delay the news?  Why not get it over with?  I just don&#039;t understand this, really.  It&#039;s not a cry in anguish, it just makes little sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSH, I know the odds of TSSC returning are incredibly poor.  I&#8217;ve said that repeatedly here.  Personally I hate relying on rumors from anyone and that&#8217;s why I look for official news.  In terms of how I feel at the moment, it&#8217;s as a baseball fan who&#8217;s team is in the playoffs, game 7, down 5 runs and it&#8217;s the bottom of the 9th. In other words, I have some hope, but it&#8217;s hoping against hope because I know the show is done for all intents and purposes.  If that sounds irrational to you, fine, I&#8217;m simply describing my state of mind.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing about TSCC&#8217;s fate that angers me, it&#8217;s the way the cancellation news is being handled.  I simply do not understand what benefit FOX derives by stringing along fans and not telling them the show is over.  Life, Pushing Daisies, Eli Stone, Prison Break, and other cancelled shows all received their news before the Fall Upfront.  It amounts to giving fans hope where none should exist.  There&#8217;s going to be a flood of email and letters regardless of when the cancellation news is announced.  So why wait?  Why torture fans?  Why delay the news?  Why not get it over with?  I just don&#8217;t understand this, really.  It&#8217;s not a cry in anguish, it just makes little sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seppy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86583</link>
		<dc:creator>Seppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86583</guid>
		<description>If i had a choice, i would want TSCC to come back. I dont like DH and I gave it a fair chance by watching the first 6 episodes. I couldnt take it anymore after that.

But in my opinion DH has a better chance than TSCC. They gave Terminator 2 breaks already. The first was a second season when its first season numbers continually dropped. Then, in season 2 when the numbers kept on dropping they gave it the 9 back extension. Also, TSCC wrapped up nicely with most things covered. John is in the future with Derek, Kyle, Allison, John Henry and Weaver. It pretty much ended. 

DH, however, got the bum end of the stick. Putting it on Friday night was a shocker to most. Everyone knew it wouldnt do well and it seemed like Fox was trying to destroy it before it got started. Ill bet Fox is thinking, that it owes this show and the people involved a break. Fox is much more lenient on its shows these days. And Foxs bad rep on pulling plugs stems from Whedons other show Firefly, and Eliza&#039;s Tru Calling. 
I still wont watch DH if its renewed, but i do feel its fans should get a break like TSCC received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i had a choice, i would want TSCC to come back. I dont like DH and I gave it a fair chance by watching the first 6 episodes. I couldnt take it anymore after that.</p>
<p>But in my opinion DH has a better chance than TSCC. They gave Terminator 2 breaks already. The first was a second season when its first season numbers continually dropped. Then, in season 2 when the numbers kept on dropping they gave it the 9 back extension. Also, TSCC wrapped up nicely with most things covered. John is in the future with Derek, Kyle, Allison, John Henry and Weaver. It pretty much ended. </p>
<p>DH, however, got the bum end of the stick. Putting it on Friday night was a shocker to most. Everyone knew it wouldnt do well and it seemed like Fox was trying to destroy it before it got started. Ill bet Fox is thinking, that it owes this show and the people involved a break. Fox is much more lenient on its shows these days. And Foxs bad rep on pulling plugs stems from Whedons other show Firefly, and Eliza&#8217;s Tru Calling.<br />
I still wont watch DH if its renewed, but i do feel its fans should get a break like TSCC received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86580</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86580</guid>
		<description>Actually, I am wondering when I look at the recent numbers for Harper&#039;s Island...would any of the Fox friday shows have done better on Saturdays compared to Fridays? Because, the would&#039;ve had less competition, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I am wondering when I look at the recent numbers for Harper&#8217;s Island&#8230;would any of the Fox friday shows have done better on Saturdays compared to Fridays? Because, the would&#8217;ve had less competition, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86572</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86572</guid>
		<description>The problem with setting a series after T-4 is that then the show and the subsequent movies pretty much have to be kept in sync or the hardcore Terminator fans will get annoyed if either of them are &quot;non-canonical&quot;. That would probably be hard to do even accepting that both the TV show and the movies would be produced by the same production company.

Halcyon owns the Terminator rights, so both the movies and the TSCC series but kept a firewall between them so neither McG nor Friedman would get in each other&#039;s way.

The time period between T-2 and T-3 has the richest story telling for a TV series that doesn&#039;t require massive special effects that would be involved in telling stories set after Judgment Day. The future episodes of TSCC were the most expensive of the shows produced for the series. They require the most expensive CGI and special effects and the most expensive sets. Stories set in the present would also resonate with audiences more over the length of time of a TV series (as opposed to the two hours of a movie like T-4) than stories set in the future.

All Friedman had to do to make TSCC a hit was drop irrelevant subplots like the high school stuff in season one, pick up the pace substantially both within episodes and the overall story arc, make sure the details were realistic, concentrate on the two core subplots of the franchise - dodging killer robots and stopping Skynet - and then push the envelope with serious exploration of the relations between humans and AIs, partly by emphasizing the relationship between John and Cameron. 

It wasn&#039;t and isn&#039;t rocket science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with setting a series after T-4 is that then the show and the subsequent movies pretty much have to be kept in sync or the hardcore Terminator fans will get annoyed if either of them are &#8220;non-canonical&#8221;. That would probably be hard to do even accepting that both the TV show and the movies would be produced by the same production company.</p>
<p>Halcyon owns the Terminator rights, so both the movies and the TSCC series but kept a firewall between them so neither McG nor Friedman would get in each other&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>The time period between T-2 and T-3 has the richest story telling for a TV series that doesn&#8217;t require massive special effects that would be involved in telling stories set after Judgment Day. The future episodes of TSCC were the most expensive of the shows produced for the series. They require the most expensive CGI and special effects and the most expensive sets. Stories set in the present would also resonate with audiences more over the length of time of a TV series (as opposed to the two hours of a movie like T-4) than stories set in the future.</p>
<p>All Friedman had to do to make TSCC a hit was drop irrelevant subplots like the high school stuff in season one, pick up the pace substantially both within episodes and the overall story arc, make sure the details were realistic, concentrate on the two core subplots of the franchise &#8211; dodging killer robots and stopping Skynet &#8211; and then push the envelope with serious exploration of the relations between humans and AIs, partly by emphasizing the relationship between John and Cameron. </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t and isn&#8217;t rocket science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Robot !</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Robot !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86570</guid>
		<description>Both TSCC (was just ok) and Dullhouse (bored me to death) dont have a ghost of a chance. The only reason the FNL zombie persists is Direct TV pumping extra cash into it plus NBC execs have a soft spot for it.

As for another Terminator series. One set after the events of Salvation would be worth trying - probably on cable this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both TSCC (was just ok) and Dullhouse (bored me to death) dont have a ghost of a chance. The only reason the FNL zombie persists is Direct TV pumping extra cash into it plus NBC execs have a soft spot for it.</p>
<p>As for another Terminator series. One set after the events of Salvation would be worth trying &#8211; probably on cable this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86563</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86563</guid>
		<description>If FOX renew this trash they could at least renew TSCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If FOX renew this trash they could at least renew TSCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86555</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86555</guid>
		<description>Better late than never, Gusar.

As I indicated above, I think WB still wants A Terminator show on TV - just not this one. A reboot, i.e., brand new show, would be difficult but not impossible. I just hope they&#039;d keep the same cast because Lena, Tom and Summer were just excellent in the three critical roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better late than never, Gusar.</p>
<p>As I indicated above, I think WB still wants A Terminator show on TV &#8211; just not this one. A reboot, i.e., brand new show, would be difficult but not impossible. I just hope they&#8217;d keep the same cast because Lena, Tom and Summer were just excellent in the three critical roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86553</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86553</guid>
		<description>I just wrote this at the TSCC wiki:

----
&quot;Ok, I&#039;ll write this here to get it out. It won&#039;t be liked. But I&#039;ve always been realistic about these things. Ok, so, here&#039;s what I got:

The Castle guys are preparing everything for a new season - acquiring writers and directors. They haven&#039;t gotten the official pickup yet, but they so sure about the renewal that they are convinced it&#039;s just a matter of time before they get the call. The Dollhouse producers are making formal pitches to the network. Pilots are coming in.

Now look at our situation: Remember last year... Even _before_ the official announcement on April 21st that we&#039;re getting season 2, we heard that they&#039;ve hired directors for the first three episodes. This hasn&#039;t happened this year, we instead have JF&#039;s &quot;I haven&#039;t spoken to Fox in weeks&quot;.

These are very clear signs. Unless we hear in the next days that JF has made a formal pitch to Fox, TSCC is not coming back.&quot;
----


There are still people clinging to hope, but I&#039;m not one of them. The signs are clear. Too clear. Come Monday, I&#039;m prepared to see a Fox schedule for next season without TSCC on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrote this at the TSCC wiki:</p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
&#8220;Ok, I&#8217;ll write this here to get it out. It won&#8217;t be liked. But I&#8217;ve always been realistic about these things. Ok, so, here&#8217;s what I got:</p>
<p>The Castle guys are preparing everything for a new season &#8211; acquiring writers and directors. They haven&#8217;t gotten the official pickup yet, but they so sure about the renewal that they are convinced it&#8217;s just a matter of time before they get the call. The Dollhouse producers are making formal pitches to the network. Pilots are coming in.</p>
<p>Now look at our situation: Remember last year&#8230; Even _before_ the official announcement on April 21st that we&#8217;re getting season 2, we heard that they&#8217;ve hired directors for the first three episodes. This hasn&#8217;t happened this year, we instead have JF&#8217;s &#8220;I haven&#8217;t spoken to Fox in weeks&#8221;.</p>
<p>These are very clear signs. Unless we hear in the next days that JF has made a formal pitch to Fox, TSCC is not coming back.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;-</p>
<p>There are still people clinging to hope, but I&#8217;m not one of them. The signs are clear. Too clear. Come Monday, I&#8217;m prepared to see a Fox schedule for next season without TSCC on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86545</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86545</guid>
		<description>I would agree - put all the dumb sitcoms and reality crap on Fridays, the shows that cost $5.95 an episode to produce, and leave the scripted stuff on other nights.

A lot of people wanted TSCC moved behind Bones or whatever, where they thought it would do OK compared to the beating it took against DWTS and Monday Night Football on Mondays. But I don&#039;t think that would have saved the show either. The problems with the show itself were too great. But it might not have died quite so fast as it did on Fridays.

Debuting Dollhouse on Fridays pretty much showed Fox didn&#039;t have much expectations for the show - OR they really thought they could pull off the &quot;Sci-Fi Fridays&quot; thing. I think it would have failed on any other night, but maybe not so dramatically. Or maybe MORE dramatically...Dollhouse has some serious problems of its own and unless it gets a season 2, it won&#039;t have the option to try to overcome them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree &#8211; put all the dumb sitcoms and reality crap on Fridays, the shows that cost $5.95 an episode to produce, and leave the scripted stuff on other nights.</p>
<p>A lot of people wanted TSCC moved behind Bones or whatever, where they thought it would do OK compared to the beating it took against DWTS and Monday Night Football on Mondays. But I don&#8217;t think that would have saved the show either. The problems with the show itself were too great. But it might not have died quite so fast as it did on Fridays.</p>
<p>Debuting Dollhouse on Fridays pretty much showed Fox didn&#8217;t have much expectations for the show &#8211; OR they really thought they could pull off the &#8220;Sci-Fi Fridays&#8221; thing. I think it would have failed on any other night, but maybe not so dramatically. Or maybe MORE dramatically&#8230;Dollhouse has some serious problems of its own and unless it gets a season 2, it won&#8217;t have the option to try to overcome them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andywhitto</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86543</link>
		<dc:creator>andywhitto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86543</guid>
		<description>You know, i really would like to see FOX put a show like House or Fringe on a friday, yes they would still get better ratings than TSCC or Dollhouse, but i think it would have a real negative effect on ratings and show FOX that airing scripted shows on Friday nights simply doesnt help ratings at all.

I wonder what they would happen if they had put Fringe on Fridays with TSCC and both viewing numbers were below 4 million, after the ratings Fringe is getting i bet it would make them think twice about &quot;porting shows&quot; to fridays.

Why dont they put shows like Family Guy on fridays ?! That seems like the more logical show to air on firday nights (in my opinion).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, i really would like to see FOX put a show like House or Fringe on a friday, yes they would still get better ratings than TSCC or Dollhouse, but i think it would have a real negative effect on ratings and show FOX that airing scripted shows on Friday nights simply doesnt help ratings at all.</p>
<p>I wonder what they would happen if they had put Fringe on Fridays with TSCC and both viewing numbers were below 4 million, after the ratings Fringe is getting i bet it would make them think twice about &#8220;porting shows&#8221; to fridays.</p>
<p>Why dont they put shows like Family Guy on fridays ?! That seems like the more logical show to air on firday nights (in my opinion).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86539</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86539</guid>
		<description>Nick C 
since you seem to know so much 
what&#039;s up with &quot;Samantha Who?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C<br />
since you seem to know so much<br />
what&#8217;s up with &#8220;Samantha Who?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86538</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86538</guid>
		<description>TT:  I don&#039;t think anybody knows what numbers Fox expected or desired for Fridays. We DO know they were north of the ones they got. So that to me implies at least a 2.0-2.5 in the demo for each show and five to six million LIVE viewers consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TT:  I don&#8217;t think anybody knows what numbers Fox expected or desired for Fridays. We DO know they were north of the ones they got. So that to me implies at least a 2.0-2.5 in the demo for each show and five to six million LIVE viewers consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86537</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86537</guid>
		<description>My personal opinion is that Whedon is being allowed to pitch a - possibly significantly rebooted or re-engineered - season 2 for Dollhouse simply because the show was profitable, according to Nick C. So they&#039;re willing to hear him out on a season 2. Doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;ll decide to do it.

TSCC has nothing whatever to offer Fox. The T-4 movie will have zero effect on any hypothetical rebooted Terminator show. 

I think WB would like to have a Terminator show on TV between movies, but only if the show itself has good ratings and earns a profit. TSCC has shown it can&#039;t do that. 

So the show can only come back as a total reboot - meaning as if TSCC never existed. New name, new concept, new plot lines. You could theoretically keep the same lead cast, since the three leads were excellent actors. TSCC ratings failure had nothing to do with the performances of the actors.

But even then it would be a struggle to regain an audience that might simply dismiss ANY Terminator show as crap based on TSCC&#039;s performance. It would require considerably promo on the part of the studio and the network that buys it to overcome the negativity attached to TSCC. 

I&#039;d like to see WB try it again - but not if they try to just continue TSCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal opinion is that Whedon is being allowed to pitch a &#8211; possibly significantly rebooted or re-engineered &#8211; season 2 for Dollhouse simply because the show was profitable, according to Nick C. So they&#8217;re willing to hear him out on a season 2. Doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;ll decide to do it.</p>
<p>TSCC has nothing whatever to offer Fox. The T-4 movie will have zero effect on any hypothetical rebooted Terminator show. </p>
<p>I think WB would like to have a Terminator show on TV between movies, but only if the show itself has good ratings and earns a profit. TSCC has shown it can&#8217;t do that. </p>
<p>So the show can only come back as a total reboot &#8211; meaning as if TSCC never existed. New name, new concept, new plot lines. You could theoretically keep the same lead cast, since the three leads were excellent actors. TSCC ratings failure had nothing to do with the performances of the actors.</p>
<p>But even then it would be a struggle to regain an audience that might simply dismiss ANY Terminator show as crap based on TSCC&#8217;s performance. It would require considerably promo on the part of the studio and the network that buys it to overcome the negativity attached to TSCC. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see WB try it again &#8211; but not if they try to just continue TSCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86535</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86535</guid>
		<description>Aww, I don&#039;t want Shawn Ryan as Showrunner on Lie to Me...I&#039;d rather see him do some original project :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, I don&#8217;t want Shawn Ryan as Showrunner on Lie to Me&#8230;I&#8217;d rather see him do some original project <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86533</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86533</guid>
		<description>TT wrote, &quot;just out of curiosity - what kind of numbers did Fox expect for the Friday TSCC/Dollhouse, PB/Dollhouse lineups?&quot;


Good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TT wrote, &#8220;just out of curiosity &#8211; what kind of numbers did Fox expect for the Friday TSCC/Dollhouse, PB/Dollhouse lineups?&#8221;</p>
<p>Good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollhouse Renewal, Nathan Fillion and more Dollhouse for Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/12/lie-to-me-renewed-next-up-dollhouse/18568/comment-page-3/#comment-86531</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollhouse Renewal, Nathan Fillion and more Dollhouse for Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18568#comment-86531</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187; Lie to Me Renewed. Next Up, Dollhouse? TV By The Numbers reports on Lie To Me&#8217;s renewal and, again, says that a Dollhouse renewal might not be totally off the books. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &raquo; Lie to Me Renewed. Next Up, Dollhouse? TV By The Numbers reports on Lie To Me&#8217;s renewal and, again, says that a Dollhouse renewal might not be totally off the books. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

