<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated:Chuck Renewed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-92653</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-92653</guid>
		<description>Rob R,

NBC are talking about running scripted shows through the summer now, so Chuck has a chance at more episodes.  That&#039;s from the mouth of Silverman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob R,</p>
<p>NBC are talking about running scripted shows through the summer now, so Chuck has a chance at more episodes.  That&#8217;s from the mouth of Silverman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-92645</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-92645</guid>
		<description>Jack, now we all remember it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, now we all remember it <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-92421</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-92421</guid>
		<description>Although I am a big chuck fan...I do not forsee the changes as enjoyable ones, we can always hope tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am a big chuck fan&#8230;I do not forsee the changes as enjoyable ones, we can always hope tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-91871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91871</guid>
		<description>There is unlikely to be a &quot;back 9&quot; for &quot;Chuck&quot; if its first episode is not expected to air until March 1, 2010.  It will have to double up for a couple of weeks to even air 13 episodes before the end of the season.   It could be worse.  It appears &quot;Friday Night Light&quot; fans will have to wait until late May 2010 for the next new episode (unless they subscribe to Direct TV!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is unlikely to be a &#8220;back 9&#8243; for &#8220;Chuck&#8221; if its first episode is not expected to air until March 1, 2010.  It will have to double up for a couple of weeks to even air 13 episodes before the end of the season.   It could be worse.  It appears &#8220;Friday Night Light&#8221; fans will have to wait until late May 2010 for the next new episode (unless they subscribe to Direct TV!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-91861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91861</guid>
		<description>Remember when I said CHUCK would be back on Monday nights? I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when I said CHUCK would be back on Monday nights? I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-91846</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91846</guid>
		<description>Chuck is already available at local stores all around the world and on the internet at reduced prices.  Unless their going to run a tie in where you get discounts on subs and stuff it&#039;s kind of pointless to sell in Subway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck is already available at local stores all around the world and on the internet at reduced prices.  Unless their going to run a tie in where you get discounts on subs and stuff it&#8217;s kind of pointless to sell in Subway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-18/#comment-91752</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91752</guid>
		<description>squiggleslash, I believe they both get money from Subway.  BS wouldn&#039;t have been so happy about the deal if he wasn&#039;t getting some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>squiggleslash, I believe they both get money from Subway.  BS wouldn&#8217;t have been so happy about the deal if he wasn&#8217;t getting some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91751</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91751</guid>
		<description>AO -

better to do a give away  -  a dvd sampler with one or two episodes on it

oh and poster of Sarah in the store,  everywhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AO -</p>
<p>better to do a give away  &#8211;  a dvd sampler with one or two episodes on it</p>
<p>oh and poster of Sarah in the store,  everywhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91723</guid>
		<description>Sharon, s&lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/19/may-19-renewals-cancellations-for-fall-2009-10-so-far/19110&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ee this week&#039;s Renew/Cancel post.&lt;/a&gt; The information is incomplete, but all the shows are there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon, s<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/05/19/may-19-renewals-cancellations-for-fall-2009-10-so-far/19110" rel="nofollow">ee this week&#8217;s Renew/Cancel post.</a> The information is incomplete, but all the shows are there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91719</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91719</guid>
		<description>Rick-
Do you mean a complete Renew Cancel Index, like ALL the shows across all networks, ranked on one list? That would be cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick-<br />
Do you mean a complete Renew Cancel Index, like ALL the shows across all networks, ranked on one list? That would be cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91633</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91633</guid>
		<description>oh that sounds like a great idea AO!!!  they could make a lot of money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh that sounds like a great idea AO!!!  they could make a lot of money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AO</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91631</link>
		<dc:creator>AO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91631</guid>
		<description>Why not sell Chuck DVD&#039;s inside of Subway&#039;s stores???  

Subway seems like a great sponsor and if they want to make this partnership as successful as possible then why not sell the DVD&#039;s directly to their customers?  It would be a great way to bring Chuck to the attention of new fans.  Perhaps they might even create a promotion where purchasing the DVD entitles the buyer to one free footlong?

I know nothing of advertising, but it would seem to me that success builds on itself and the more successful Chuck is then the more people will think to go to Subway, or go more frequently if they were already customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not sell Chuck DVD&#8217;s inside of Subway&#8217;s stores???  </p>
<p>Subway seems like a great sponsor and if they want to make this partnership as successful as possible then why not sell the DVD&#8217;s directly to their customers?  It would be a great way to bring Chuck to the attention of new fans.  Perhaps they might even create a promotion where purchasing the DVD entitles the buyer to one free footlong?</p>
<p>I know nothing of advertising, but it would seem to me that success builds on itself and the more successful Chuck is then the more people will think to go to Subway, or go more frequently if they were already customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91563</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91563</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more Christi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more Christi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christi G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91539</link>
		<dc:creator>Christi G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91539</guid>
		<description>YAY!!!!  I am so happy!!!  NO show makes me smile the way Chuck does!!!! :D  I am worried though when they say they are going to cut some of the writers... while I LOVE the cast, it is the writing that really is the lifeblood of ANY good show, and this show imparticular... it is SO creative and I sit there just blown away by the creative crazy writing that is SO much fun and SO comic book meets real life....

Another thing that worries me... with just 13 episodes... I really REALLY want Chuck to have a GOOD conclusion... it would make me so sad if everything and everyone was left just hanging with no real conclusion or ending...a non-ending ending, and 13 episodes makes me scared that might happen...that would really suck.  

But... I am so happy for 13 episodes and hopefully they will treat this show right, despite whatever changes are going on behind the scenes.. :D:D Yay Chuck!!!  (And thank-you NBC!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY!!!!  I am so happy!!!  NO show makes me smile the way Chuck does!!!! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   I am worried though when they say they are going to cut some of the writers&#8230; while I LOVE the cast, it is the writing that really is the lifeblood of ANY good show, and this show imparticular&#8230; it is SO creative and I sit there just blown away by the creative crazy writing that is SO much fun and SO comic book meets real life&#8230;.</p>
<p>Another thing that worries me&#8230; with just 13 episodes&#8230; I really REALLY want Chuck to have a GOOD conclusion&#8230; it would make me so sad if everything and everyone was left just hanging with no real conclusion or ending&#8230;a non-ending ending, and 13 episodes makes me scared that might happen&#8230;that would really suck.  </p>
<p>But&#8230; I am so happy for 13 episodes and hopefully they will treat this show right, despite whatever changes are going on behind the scenes.. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> :D Yay Chuck!!!  (And thank-you NBC!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91538</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91538</guid>
		<description>Haha Steve! Love the post in response to Susan.  And Rick Holy, thank you for all your great posts regarding Susan&#039;s ridiculous comments.  I can not be happier that Chuck is being renewed, and my gratitude is never ending.  I love Chuck, it&#039;s my favorite show, and I would love to be kept updated on the new episodes in Season 3.  Again, thanks for all you posts Rick, and Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha Steve! Love the post in response to Susan.  And Rick Holy, thank you for all your great posts regarding Susan&#8217;s ridiculous comments.  I can not be happier that Chuck is being renewed, and my gratitude is never ending.  I love Chuck, it&#8217;s my favorite show, and I would love to be kept updated on the new episodes in Season 3.  Again, thanks for all you posts Rick, and Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck&#38;Charlene4ever</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91306</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck&#38;Charlene4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91306</guid>
		<description>I just read that Chuck will be a mid season replacement.  So this is NBC tactic for killing Chuck.  They are going to kill Chuck in the same matter they killed Quantum Leap (another NBC show with a huge fan base).  It took me awhile before I would allow myself to get caught up in a NBC show until Chuck came along.  So during the next 8 months we need to keep Chuck in the public eye and hopefully we can Save Chuck from the same fate that killed Quantum Leap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read that Chuck will be a mid season replacement.  So this is NBC tactic for killing Chuck.  They are going to kill Chuck in the same matter they killed Quantum Leap (another NBC show with a huge fan base).  It took me awhile before I would allow myself to get caught up in a NBC show until Chuck came along.  So during the next 8 months we need to keep Chuck in the public eye and hopefully we can Save Chuck from the same fate that killed Quantum Leap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91274</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91274</guid>
		<description>Martin this site isn&#039;t only about Chuck.  While I like Chuck Alan&#039;s right it&#039;s but one show out of many that deserves respect.  If you want people to respect your show then you should show others respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin this site isn&#8217;t only about Chuck.  While I like Chuck Alan&#8217;s right it&#8217;s but one show out of many that deserves respect.  If you want people to respect your show then you should show others respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91240</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91240</guid>
		<description>susan f-you wat r u doing commenting on a site that is about chuck news wats wrong is there no news for ur crqppy shows and all u other chuck haters f-off jerks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>susan f-you wat r u doing commenting on a site that is about chuck news wats wrong is there no news for ur crqppy shows and all u other chuck haters f-off jerks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91166</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91166</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t appreciate Susan&#039;s attitude, it is a bit frustrating for those of us non-Chuck fans that 85% of time on this website is spent talking and obsessing over Chuck. 

Let&#039;s face it, Chuck is a small, fairly low-rated show with a cult-following. But overall, there are lots of other TV shows to discuss. This website is a bit Chuck-obsessed to say the least which is frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t appreciate Susan&#8217;s attitude, it is a bit frustrating for those of us non-Chuck fans that 85% of time on this website is spent talking and obsessing over Chuck. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, Chuck is a small, fairly low-rated show with a cult-following. But overall, there are lots of other TV shows to discuss. This website is a bit Chuck-obsessed to say the least which is frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-91028</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-91028</guid>
		<description>Chuck had a possibility for a good ending at the end of season 2 unfortunately we didn&#039;t see it and now it&#039;s been pushed for a 3rd season.  While I&#039;m glad it&#039;s renewed we&#039;ll see what happens with that as I have reservations about it moving to Fridays.  Networks don&#039;t normally order the back 9 to give a proper ending they order it to fill their time slots.  Life On Mars was ended towards the end which is why you see the somewhat rushed ending it had where they threw it all together in the last episode.  A rushed ending however is better then no ending or a cliffhanger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck had a possibility for a good ending at the end of season 2 unfortunately we didn&#8217;t see it and now it&#8217;s been pushed for a 3rd season.  While I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s renewed we&#8217;ll see what happens with that as I have reservations about it moving to Fridays.  Networks don&#8217;t normally order the back 9 to give a proper ending they order it to fill their time slots.  Life On Mars was ended towards the end which is why you see the somewhat rushed ending it had where they threw it all together in the last episode.  A rushed ending however is better then no ending or a cliffhanger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90763</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90763</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m VERY happy that Chuck got the renewal. I think it&#039;s a great show, one that has had my fiance and I laughing every Monday night (I evoked even MORE laughs and dirty looks from her when I said I wanted to hire &quot;Jeffster&quot; to play &quot;Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto&quot; at our own wedding!).

I just hope that if Chuck IS cancelled after this season, that NBC will at least do it justice like ABC let Life On Mars do - order the back 9 eps with the understanding that the series will be done, and let it finish on a good note. Don&#039;t leave it with a cliffhanger ending like a lot of cancellations end up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m VERY happy that Chuck got the renewal. I think it&#8217;s a great show, one that has had my fiance and I laughing every Monday night (I evoked even MORE laughs and dirty looks from her when I said I wanted to hire &#8220;Jeffster&#8221; to play &#8220;Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto&#8221; at our own wedding!).</p>
<p>I just hope that if Chuck IS cancelled after this season, that NBC will at least do it justice like ABC let Life On Mars do &#8211; order the back 9 eps with the understanding that the series will be done, and let it finish on a good note. Don&#8217;t leave it with a cliffhanger ending like a lot of cancellations end up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lala</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90708</link>
		<dc:creator>Lala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90708</guid>
		<description>Yeah I totally agree djm. They need that kind of ad over here it&#039;s sooooo much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I totally agree djm. They need that kind of ad over here it&#8217;s sooooo much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90666</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90666</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m a fan of Chuck I have a feeling we&#039;re going to see huge changes in store for the show from budget to production to storyline and so on.  I definitely have a concern about it being banished to Friday as it&#039;s never a good thing if that ends up being the resting place as we all know why shows typically get sent to Fri/Sat nights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m a fan of Chuck I have a feeling we&#8217;re going to see huge changes in store for the show from budget to production to storyline and so on.  I definitely have a concern about it being banished to Friday as it&#8217;s never a good thing if that ends up being the resting place as we all know why shows typically get sent to Fri/Sat nights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90656</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90656</guid>
		<description>Rick, do you read our renew/cancel indexes?  If not, there will be an end of season tally for that via the index.  Click on the &quot;Renew/Cancel&quot; index link on the far right of the white navigation bar above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, do you read our renew/cancel indexes?  If not, there will be an end of season tally for that via the index.  Click on the &#8220;Renew/Cancel&#8221; index link on the far right of the white navigation bar above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djm</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90654</link>
		<dc:creator>djm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90654</guid>
		<description>wow that virgin 1 ad &gt; all nbc promos put together
yay chuck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that virgin 1 ad &gt; all nbc promos put together<br />
yay chuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Holy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90652</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Holy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90652</guid>
		<description>Robert - after all the official network announcements are over and done with - and things start to &quot;calm down&quot; during the summer, could you post a list of all the shows that were canceled and renewed and what their ratings numbers were??  It would be interesting to see what shows were renewed on one network that actually had much worse numbers than shows that were cancelled on another network.  For example, it would seem like a lot of the shows on NBC (including my favorite, CHUCK) that were renewed might have been cancelled if they had the same ratings numbers but were on Fox or CBS.  Thanks.  And THANKS AGAIN for all the CHUCK information.  It helped A LOT during our 40 days of wandering in the desert of renewal/cancellation uncertainty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; after all the official network announcements are over and done with &#8211; and things start to &#8220;calm down&#8221; during the summer, could you post a list of all the shows that were canceled and renewed and what their ratings numbers were??  It would be interesting to see what shows were renewed on one network that actually had much worse numbers than shows that were cancelled on another network.  For example, it would seem like a lot of the shows on NBC (including my favorite, CHUCK) that were renewed might have been cancelled if they had the same ratings numbers but were on Fox or CBS.  Thanks.  And THANKS AGAIN for all the CHUCK information.  It helped A LOT during our 40 days of wandering in the desert of renewal/cancellation uncertainty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90650</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90650</guid>
		<description>Question: Who gets the Subway revenues, WB or NBC?

I&#039;m just curious to know if they can recoup some of their budget via more product placement, though I suspect they&#039;ve probably milked that cow for all its worth anyway.

Indeed, come to think of it, the Buy More &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; to come back next season if only for the fact that it probably pays for itself ten times over in product placement revenues. If it doesn&#039;t, they&#039;re doing it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: Who gets the Subway revenues, WB or NBC?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious to know if they can recoup some of their budget via more product placement, though I suspect they&#8217;ve probably milked that cow for all its worth anyway.</p>
<p>Indeed, come to think of it, the Buy More <i>has</i> to come back next season if only for the fact that it probably pays for itself ten times over in product placement revenues. If it doesn&#8217;t, they&#8217;re doing it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90646</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90646</guid>
		<description>I believe the cuts in the licensing fees were very real, so I suspect cuts to the show&#039;s production budget will be real too.  But there are theoretically a number of ways to absorb those cuts without skimping on quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the cuts in the licensing fees were very real, so I suspect cuts to the show&#8217;s production budget will be real too.  But there are theoretically a number of ways to absorb those cuts without skimping on quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drosejr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90641</link>
		<dc:creator>drosejr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90641</guid>
		<description>Robert,
Thanks for that insight, it matches the hunch I had.  So the ball really is in the court of Warner Bros. and the producers, to really decide what the show budget would be.  Perhaps the leaks going around the Internet are convenient from a negotiating perspective with regards to salary negotiations with writers, the cast and crew.  If they are smart, they wouldn&#039;t skimp too much on the show quality and story, so as to set themselves up to get a Back 9 order and Season 4 renewal with a higher license fee next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
Thanks for that insight, it matches the hunch I had.  So the ball really is in the court of Warner Bros. and the producers, to really decide what the show budget would be.  Perhaps the leaks going around the Internet are convenient from a negotiating perspective with regards to salary negotiations with writers, the cast and crew.  If they are smart, they wouldn&#8217;t skimp too much on the show quality and story, so as to set themselves up to get a Back 9 order and Season 4 renewal with a higher license fee next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90633</link>
		<dc:creator>BMack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90633</guid>
		<description>So that means Warner Brothers is doing the budget cutting?  Warner Brothers is deciding (allegedly) to fire two writers and possibly eliminate a character?  It makes sense that they would have to due to NBC driving a hard bargain.  I just always thought that NBC was the &quot;bad guy&quot; making writers get fired etc.  I guess they are, but only by extension...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that means Warner Brothers is doing the budget cutting?  Warner Brothers is deciding (allegedly) to fire two writers and possibly eliminate a character?  It makes sense that they would have to due to NBC driving a hard bargain.  I just always thought that NBC was the &#8220;bad guy&#8221; making writers get fired etc.  I guess they are, but only by extension&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-17/#comment-90628</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90628</guid>
		<description>drosejr: technically Warner Brothers could spend whatever it wanted on the show, but they can&#039;t charge NBC more than NBC agreed to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drosejr: technically Warner Brothers could spend whatever it wanted on the show, but they can&#8217;t charge NBC more than NBC agreed to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drosejr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90620</link>
		<dc:creator>drosejr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90620</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little naive about the TV business, so perhaps someone more knowledgeable could help me with this question.
Now that Warner Bros. TV and NBC have agreed on a show budget, what is to stop Warner Bros. from backfilling that budget with a portion of the ancillary revenues that the show generates - DVD sales, streaming revenues, etc.  Do those profits just flow to Time Warner&#039;s bottom line, or can the show producers lay hands on that as well?  I understand the show needs to be run like a business, but NBC&#039;s license fee isn&#039;t the only source of revenues for the show.  I didn&#039;t realize that NBC can also control the expense side as well.  Thanks for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little naive about the TV business, so perhaps someone more knowledgeable could help me with this question.<br />
Now that Warner Bros. TV and NBC have agreed on a show budget, what is to stop Warner Bros. from backfilling that budget with a portion of the ancillary revenues that the show generates &#8211; DVD sales, streaming revenues, etc.  Do those profits just flow to Time Warner&#8217;s bottom line, or can the show producers lay hands on that as well?  I understand the show needs to be run like a business, but NBC&#8217;s license fee isn&#8217;t the only source of revenues for the show.  I didn&#8217;t realize that NBC can also control the expense side as well.  Thanks for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90608</guid>
		<description>YAY FLIPPING YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i am gonna eat pancakes to celebrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY FLIPPING YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i am gonna eat pancakes to celebrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flounder</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90599</link>
		<dc:creator>Flounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90599</guid>
		<description>Personally I don&#039;t feel the Buy More is going anywhere.  How many times was it used for product placement of Madden Football, Fable II, Call of Duty, City of Villains, etc.  It is a treasure trove of money for the show.  Buy More will stay, it is a already an established set, and it is a cash cow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t feel the Buy More is going anywhere.  How many times was it used for product placement of Madden Football, Fable II, Call of Duty, City of Villains, etc.  It is a treasure trove of money for the show.  Buy More will stay, it is a already an established set, and it is a cash cow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dai</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90553</link>
		<dc:creator>Dai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree that Chuck trolls invading most of the threads aren&#039;t a majority, but it IS what comes out of the lot when you read. The fact that people are still talking about Susan&#039;s post prooves it. I didn&#039;t post before this topic but I quickly read some comments, and there were a lot of them (or maybe just the same people posting over and over again). That&#039;s what bothered me in the &quot;Save Chuck campaign&quot; and could have hurt it&#039;s credibility. People bashing other shows(some they obviously don&#039;t watch included), got fastly old to read.
I&#039;d say it&#039;s too bad there&#039;s noone to control the comments before their posted would help, but I admit that would be a LOT of work.

I&#039;d love to see how much budget cuts there are for NBC&#039;s shows. Except Chuck, we didn&#039;t hear much official word yet. I know Heroes was getting it&#039;s budget smashed since it&#039;s half season, and continues to, but I didn&#039;t read anything about the other shows (I didn&#039;t dig around so I can&#039;t really know though).

I don&#039;t know how much it will hurt Chuck, since I didn&#039;t get the occasion to watch it yet, but it does sound like NBC is slow-killing it. Sounds like a [let&#039;s cut the budget and if ratings go down then we have an excuse to cancel it].
They&#039;re doing the same thing with Heroes (firing producers/directors, which were always a strengh of the show, while writers are still more than 15). While I don&#039;t mind the budget cut (should be for the best concerning Heroes) or moving it at 8PM (if what was reported is right), it sounds like a [let&#039;s drasticly cut it&#039;s budget and hope it&#039;s ratings don&#039;t go down too much so it can bring audience to &quot;insert-new-show&#039;s-name&quot;].
Just a thought. And hopefully Chuck will proove them wrong, and show how stupid people at NBC are :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that Chuck trolls invading most of the threads aren&#8217;t a majority, but it IS what comes out of the lot when you read. The fact that people are still talking about Susan&#8217;s post prooves it. I didn&#8217;t post before this topic but I quickly read some comments, and there were a lot of them (or maybe just the same people posting over and over again). That&#8217;s what bothered me in the &#8220;Save Chuck campaign&#8221; and could have hurt it&#8217;s credibility. People bashing other shows(some they obviously don&#8217;t watch included), got fastly old to read.<br />
I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s too bad there&#8217;s noone to control the comments before their posted would help, but I admit that would be a LOT of work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see how much budget cuts there are for NBC&#8217;s shows. Except Chuck, we didn&#8217;t hear much official word yet. I know Heroes was getting it&#8217;s budget smashed since it&#8217;s half season, and continues to, but I didn&#8217;t read anything about the other shows (I didn&#8217;t dig around so I can&#8217;t really know though).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much it will hurt Chuck, since I didn&#8217;t get the occasion to watch it yet, but it does sound like NBC is slow-killing it. Sounds like a [let's cut the budget and if ratings go down then we have an excuse to cancel it].<br />
They&#8217;re doing the same thing with Heroes (firing producers/directors, which were always a strengh of the show, while writers are still more than 15). While I don&#8217;t mind the budget cut (should be for the best concerning Heroes) or moving it at 8PM (if what was reported is right), it sounds like a [let's drasticly cut it's budget and hope it's ratings don't go down too much so it can bring audience to "insert-new-show's-name"].<br />
Just a thought. And hopefully Chuck will proove them wrong, and show how stupid people at NBC are <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90542</guid>
		<description>Tommy says: 
May 18th, 2009 at 7:03 pm 
&quot;They were given 13 and ordered the other 9 before the season premiere I think&quot;

Well, lets hope they do the same this time around. Although, the budget restrictaions might not let that happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy says:<br />
May 18th, 2009 at 7:03 pm<br />
&#8220;They were given 13 and ordered the other 9 before the season premiere I think&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, lets hope they do the same this time around. Although, the budget restrictaions might not let that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90529</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90529</guid>
		<description>Due to budget cuts, the Buy More will become a Pay Less.

Due to budget cuts, the General&#039;s video conferences will be held over an iPhone rather than a big screen TV.

Due to budget cuts, Big Mike will lose a hundred pounds.

Due to budget cuts, Fulcrum will become a golf pivot. Oh, never mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to budget cuts, the Buy More will become a Pay Less.</p>
<p>Due to budget cuts, the General&#8217;s video conferences will be held over an iPhone rather than a big screen TV.</p>
<p>Due to budget cuts, Big Mike will lose a hundred pounds.</p>
<p>Due to budget cuts, Fulcrum will become a golf pivot. Oh, never mind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumbo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90524</guid>
		<description>Haha yeah

&quot;Due to budget cuts, ten minutes of each episode of Chuck will be a close-up shot of a television showing The Jay Leno Show&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha yeah</p>
<p>&#8220;Due to budget cuts, ten minutes of each episode of Chuck will be a close-up shot of a television showing The Jay Leno Show&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90477</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90477</guid>
		<description>Maybe they could make the Buy More set cheaper by, say, removing all the Sonys and replacing them with Vizios...

There was a &quot;Yay, Dollhouse has been renewed&quot; thread I read on one of the Whedon fan sites a few days ago, and the subject of budget cuts came up. And one humorous speculation comment was &quot;Due to budget cuts, all episodes will now be made in 140 characters or less.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they could make the Buy More set cheaper by, say, removing all the Sonys and replacing them with Vizios&#8230;</p>
<p>There was a &#8220;Yay, Dollhouse has been renewed&#8221; thread I read on one of the Whedon fan sites a few days ago, and the subject of budget cuts came up. And one humorous speculation comment was &#8220;Due to budget cuts, all episodes will now be made in 140 characters or less.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90474</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90474</guid>
		<description>Jane

&quot;h, please. Chuck fans invaded the Southland renewal thread wholesale and acted just like the trolls you accuse Susan of being It&quot;

Perhaps some did, I did not. Others did not. And even if they it does not excuse her behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane</p>
<p>&#8220;h, please. Chuck fans invaded the Southland renewal thread wholesale and acted just like the trolls you accuse Susan of being It&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps some did, I did not. Others did not. And even if they it does not excuse her behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90471</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90471</guid>
		<description>G says
&quot;So since Susan doesn’t worship Chuck she’s a “troll”?&quot;

No, her condescending, spiteful and provocative attitude makes her a troll.

I didn&#039;t particularly like TSCC, but I don&#039;t start saying its a totally crappy show without value, because that would hurt people. The shows are fantasy, the feelings people have for them are real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G says<br />
&#8220;So since Susan doesn’t worship Chuck she’s a “troll”?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, her condescending, spiteful and provocative attitude makes her a troll.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t particularly like TSCC, but I don&#8217;t start saying its a totally crappy show without value, because that would hurt people. The shows are fantasy, the feelings people have for them are real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90458</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90458</guid>
		<description>For those arguing for the Buy More subplots to be retained, that stuff is easy to replace. There are three main leads on this show - everybody else is a supporting character and they can be shuffled almost at will without major ratings damage, in my opinion. Although you could say Elle and Awesome are &quot;main leads&quot; as well.

As for Chuck keeping secrets, that&#039;s a concept that could be done away or simply altered to put him in a different set of circumstances. Remember, one of the subplots all season is Chuck growing into a different person and a different lifestyle than &quot;just&quot; a Nerd Herder at Buy More because of his development as a &quot;spy&quot;. If you want the character to experience character development - other than learning kung fu from the Intersect, which is just a &quot;gimmick&quot; - than you need to be prepared to see him make moves in that direction which would entail changing the importance of the Buy More in his life.

It doesn&#039;t have to be radical right away. The Buy More set could be modified to be smaller, with scenes occasionally set there with a reduced cast for those scenes and the budget could easily be trimmed. Dump a couple of the ancillary Buy More characters. Then they just phase it out as part of the season 3 story arc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those arguing for the Buy More subplots to be retained, that stuff is easy to replace. There are three main leads on this show &#8211; everybody else is a supporting character and they can be shuffled almost at will without major ratings damage, in my opinion. Although you could say Elle and Awesome are &#8220;main leads&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>As for Chuck keeping secrets, that&#8217;s a concept that could be done away or simply altered to put him in a different set of circumstances. Remember, one of the subplots all season is Chuck growing into a different person and a different lifestyle than &#8220;just&#8221; a Nerd Herder at Buy More because of his development as a &#8220;spy&#8221;. If you want the character to experience character development &#8211; other than learning kung fu from the Intersect, which is just a &#8220;gimmick&#8221; &#8211; than you need to be prepared to see him make moves in that direction which would entail changing the importance of the Buy More in his life.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have to be radical right away. The Buy More set could be modified to be smaller, with scenes occasionally set there with a reduced cast for those scenes and the budget could easily be trimmed. Dump a couple of the ancillary Buy More characters. Then they just phase it out as part of the season 3 story arc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90451</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90451</guid>
		<description>YES!!! This is the best show on T.V.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!!! This is the best show on T.V.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90450</guid>
		<description>The Budget cuts shouldn&#039;t be too noticeable considering the writers already setup a scenario where Chuck can leave the Buymore, and that alone can cut down on supporting cast. The loss of 2 writers worries me slightly but not enough to think that the show will tank due to it. Just make sure you watch it, and if there are any nielsen viewers make sure you all watch it live on whatever night it airs and DVR anything else that you may want to watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Budget cuts shouldn&#8217;t be too noticeable considering the writers already setup a scenario where Chuck can leave the Buymore, and that alone can cut down on supporting cast. The loss of 2 writers worries me slightly but not enough to think that the show will tank due to it. Just make sure you watch it, and if there are any nielsen viewers make sure you all watch it live on whatever night it airs and DVR anything else that you may want to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snipes</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90444</link>
		<dc:creator>Snipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90444</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s good.  But the massive budget cuts, loss of two writers, and limited screen time for some of the major supporting characters throws too big of a wrench in the gears to deny.  Still seems to me NBC is trying to kill Chuck off slowly, they don&#039;t seem to be making such large cuts to their other shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s good.  But the massive budget cuts, loss of two writers, and limited screen time for some of the major supporting characters throws too big of a wrench in the gears to deny.  Still seems to me NBC is trying to kill Chuck off slowly, they don&#8217;t seem to be making such large cuts to their other shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90440</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90440</guid>
		<description>They were given 13 and ordered the other 9 before the season premiere I think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were given 13 and ordered the other 9 before the season premiere I think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snipes</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90439</link>
		<dc:creator>Snipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90439</guid>
		<description>Tommy, I thought they were originally given a full season for season 2, if I&#039;m wrong and they were only given 13 then that makes me a little more hopeful, but still not a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy, I thought they were originally given a full season for season 2, if I&#8217;m wrong and they were only given 13 then that makes me a little more hopeful, but still not a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90437</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90437</guid>
		<description>Snipes Chuck has always been given an initial order of 13 with a back 9 option. You can&#039;t count the show out. The only reason it was in jeopardy this year is due to Leno. I have faith that it will live on to see the back 9 and a 4th season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snipes Chuck has always been given an initial order of 13 with a back 9 option. You can&#8217;t count the show out. The only reason it was in jeopardy this year is due to Leno. I have faith that it will live on to see the back 9 and a 4th season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snipes</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90435</link>
		<dc:creator>Snipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90435</guid>
		<description>Well glad to hear it&#039;s coming back, but not happy to hear about the 13 episodes and budget cuts.  Seems to me this is just NBC&#039;s way of slowly killing the show without just outright canceling it and leading to riots from the fans in front of their offices.  As I predicted the Chuck drama will never be over, and I only expect it to get worse at the end of next season when they will undoubtedly do this again.  Warner Brother&#039;s should have offered the show to the CW, but I guess 13 episodes and big cuts is worth it more than a chance of a better and longer life on another station.  Frankly I&#039;ve lost what little respect I had for NBC, and will probably stop watching everything they air expect Chuck.  A station that quickly renews a tanking new show like Parks and Recreation, yet takes a month to decide on a show whose ratings have been stable all year proves NBC as nut jobs running things.  Frankly I&#039;m still of the opinon Chuck fans should have put all their energy into having Chuck moved to another network, staying at NBC only slightly prolongs the inevitable, and I think all this is, is NBC&#039;s way of saving a little face and slowing chipping the show down.  It&#039;s not worth having the show around if NBC&#039;s going to start sabotaging it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well glad to hear it&#8217;s coming back, but not happy to hear about the 13 episodes and budget cuts.  Seems to me this is just NBC&#8217;s way of slowly killing the show without just outright canceling it and leading to riots from the fans in front of their offices.  As I predicted the Chuck drama will never be over, and I only expect it to get worse at the end of next season when they will undoubtedly do this again.  Warner Brother&#8217;s should have offered the show to the CW, but I guess 13 episodes and big cuts is worth it more than a chance of a better and longer life on another station.  Frankly I&#8217;ve lost what little respect I had for NBC, and will probably stop watching everything they air expect Chuck.  A station that quickly renews a tanking new show like Parks and Recreation, yet takes a month to decide on a show whose ratings have been stable all year proves NBC as nut jobs running things.  Frankly I&#8217;m still of the opinon Chuck fans should have put all their energy into having Chuck moved to another network, staying at NBC only slightly prolongs the inevitable, and I think all this is, is NBC&#8217;s way of saving a little face and slowing chipping the show down.  It&#8217;s not worth having the show around if NBC&#8217;s going to start sabotaging it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imkeh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/17/chuck-renewed/18828/comment-page-16/#comment-90430</link>
		<dc:creator>imkeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=18828#comment-90430</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great interview Woohgobooga.  I&#039;d love to hear from the rest of the cast. Esp Casey, Zach and Yvonne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great interview Woohgobooga.  I&#8217;d love to hear from the rest of the cast. Esp Casey, Zach and Yvonne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

