<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBC 2009-2010 schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93590</link>
		<dc:creator>ljo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93590</guid>
		<description>&quot;putting “community” on the 8pm timeslot is a bad idea, especially it’s a new show&quot;

I could be wrong but I think Community&#039;s first several episodes will follow The Office at 9:30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;putting “community” on the 8pm timeslot is a bad idea, especially it’s a new show&#8221;</p>
<p>I could be wrong but I think Community&#8217;s first several episodes will follow The Office at 9:30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93588</link>
		<dc:creator>nex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93588</guid>
		<description>i can see a lot of problems in this schedule

1. putting &quot;community&quot; on the 8pm timeslot is a bad idea, especially it&#039;s a new show
i think nbc thursday schedule should be like this
8:00: &quot;parks and recreation&quot;
8:30: &quot;the office&quot;
9:00: &quot;SNL Thursday Report&quot;/ &quot;30 rock&quot;
9:30: &quot;community&quot;

2. MIDSEASON: chuck on monday at 8pm? so sorry for chuck, it might get cancelled, &quot;chuck&quot; will face tough competition on shows like DWTS and House

3. 2 hours of &quot;biggest loser&quot;, that&#039;s too much, viewers might get tired of the show. i think they should place a new drama (or chuck) on the 9pm tuesday timeslot, after biggest loser  

4. MIDSEASON: on sunday, 2 hours of &quot;celebrity apprentice&quot; is also too much, nbc should cut down 1 hour &quot;celebrity apprentice&quot; and put a new game show or reality show or they should bring back deal or no deal. i think nbc should make sunday their reality/game show block. it might help them in the ratings

... by looking at this schedule, nbc will probably be 4th, again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can see a lot of problems in this schedule</p>
<p>1. putting &#8220;community&#8221; on the 8pm timeslot is a bad idea, especially it&#8217;s a new show<br />
i think nbc thursday schedule should be like this<br />
8:00: &#8220;parks and recreation&#8221;<br />
8:30: &#8220;the office&#8221;<br />
9:00: &#8220;SNL Thursday Report&#8221;/ &#8220;30 rock&#8221;<br />
9:30: &#8220;community&#8221;</p>
<p>2. MIDSEASON: chuck on monday at 8pm? so sorry for chuck, it might get cancelled, &#8220;chuck&#8221; will face tough competition on shows like DWTS and House</p>
<p>3. 2 hours of &#8220;biggest loser&#8221;, that&#8217;s too much, viewers might get tired of the show. i think they should place a new drama (or chuck) on the 9pm tuesday timeslot, after biggest loser  </p>
<p>4. MIDSEASON: on sunday, 2 hours of &#8220;celebrity apprentice&#8221; is also too much, nbc should cut down 1 hour &#8220;celebrity apprentice&#8221; and put a new game show or reality show or they should bring back deal or no deal. i think nbc should make sunday their reality/game show block. it might help them in the ratings</p>
<p>&#8230; by looking at this schedule, nbc will probably be 4th, again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eydie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93189</link>
		<dc:creator>eydie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93189</guid>
		<description>i just realized something else.  medium is/was the only show i watch/watched on nbc!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just realized something else.  medium is/was the only show i watch/watched on nbc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eydie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93188</link>
		<dc:creator>eydie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93188</guid>
		<description>cbs has officially picked up &quot;medium&quot; and i couldn&#039;t be happier.  i&#039;m still seriously ticked off with cbs for cancelling &quot;moonlight&quot; last year, but i sincerely say &quot;thank you&quot; for picking up a great show like medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cbs has officially picked up &#8220;medium&#8221; and i couldn&#8217;t be happier.  i&#8217;m still seriously ticked off with cbs for cancelling &#8220;moonlight&#8221; last year, but i sincerely say &#8220;thank you&#8221; for picking up a great show like medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93143</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93143</guid>
		<description>I.E. To Be Continued and homage to Quantum Leap in Chuck

Didn&#039;t think of a Quantum Leap homage element when I saw that (and I should have, given Scott Bakula was in the finale and I did watch Quantum Leap when it first aired -- d&#039;oh! New personal rule:  don&#039;t post after midnight local time) and, yes, I do remember the post-run airings had a changed ending.  

Even if it was to get viewers vocal about the continuation of Chuck, though, I just feel that tagging the end of a show&#039;s season finale with &quot;to be continued&quot; when it&#039;s not a lock for a new season is, karma-wise, tempting fate.  NBC&#039;s recent record on cancellations -- and how they have been handled (Medium, Earl, and Las Vegas) -- makes me a bit jittery, which is why I was thinking &quot;Geez, another clay pigeon ready in the shooting gallery&quot; when I saw it.  Overreaction on my part?  Perhaps... but not without justification :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I.E. To Be Continued and homage to Quantum Leap in Chuck</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t think of a Quantum Leap homage element when I saw that (and I should have, given Scott Bakula was in the finale and I did watch Quantum Leap when it first aired &#8212; d&#8217;oh! New personal rule:  don&#8217;t post after midnight local time) and, yes, I do remember the post-run airings had a changed ending.  </p>
<p>Even if it was to get viewers vocal about the continuation of Chuck, though, I just feel that tagging the end of a show&#8217;s season finale with &#8220;to be continued&#8221; when it&#8217;s not a lock for a new season is, karma-wise, tempting fate.  NBC&#8217;s recent record on cancellations &#8212; and how they have been handled (Medium, Earl, and Las Vegas) &#8212; makes me a bit jittery, which is why I was thinking &#8220;Geez, another clay pigeon ready in the shooting gallery&#8221; when I saw it.  Overreaction on my part?  Perhaps&#8230; but not without justification <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Guy Named John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93134</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy Named John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93134</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never a smart move to put “to be continued” at the end of a season finale without a guarantee it won’t be a SERIES finale.&quot;

To be continued was put there as an homage to Quantum Leap and to get viewers to get vocal about continuing the series, Quantum Leap which did the same thing when it ran its season finale only to it did not get renewed... the subsequent airings changed the ending to something like &quot;Beckett never returned home&quot; I figured that Chuck would have done the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never a smart move to put “to be continued” at the end of a season finale without a guarantee it won’t be a SERIES finale.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be continued was put there as an homage to Quantum Leap and to get viewers to get vocal about continuing the series, Quantum Leap which did the same thing when it ran its season finale only to it did not get renewed&#8230; the subsequent airings changed the ending to something like &#8220;Beckett never returned home&#8221; I figured that Chuck would have done the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93101</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93101</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if the creative team killed Chuck with the season finale YET.  It is renewed and it is coming back so time will tell how the enhanced Intersect works out and what stories are told in the process along the way.  I do suspect the writers and producers are breathing a sigh of relief at Chuck not being put on the shelf beside Las Vegas, John Doe (and apparently MNIE -- I haven&#039;t watched it since season 1 so was not aware of the Episode 1 ax -- ouch and sorry about that) in the &quot;really bad timing on cliffhangers&quot; trophy case, however.  Never a smart move to put &quot;to be continued&quot; at the end of a season finale without a guarantee it won&#039;t be a SERIES finale.

I do agree that Chuck and company flew over the shark a few times this year, though.  I do watch the show and, for the most part, I like it but there were some moments (and at least the majority of 4 episodes -- I won&#039;t name them since it is a subjective subject) this year that made me cringe or think &quot;who gets the writing credit for that piece of art, Jack Daniels or Sam Adams?&quot; My hope is that Chuck 3.0 is a great season and the ratings pick up to guarantee a renewal.  If not, well, I&#039;ll enjoy the ride while it lasts :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if the creative team killed Chuck with the season finale YET.  It is renewed and it is coming back so time will tell how the enhanced Intersect works out and what stories are told in the process along the way.  I do suspect the writers and producers are breathing a sigh of relief at Chuck not being put on the shelf beside Las Vegas, John Doe (and apparently MNIE &#8212; I haven&#8217;t watched it since season 1 so was not aware of the Episode 1 ax &#8212; ouch and sorry about that) in the &#8220;really bad timing on cliffhangers&#8221; trophy case, however.  Never a smart move to put &#8220;to be continued&#8221; at the end of a season finale without a guarantee it won&#8217;t be a SERIES finale.</p>
<p>I do agree that Chuck and company flew over the shark a few times this year, though.  I do watch the show and, for the most part, I like it but there were some moments (and at least the majority of 4 episodes &#8212; I won&#8217;t name them since it is a subjective subject) this year that made me cringe or think &#8220;who gets the writing credit for that piece of art, Jack Daniels or Sam Adams?&#8221; My hope is that Chuck 3.0 is a great season and the ratings pick up to guarantee a renewal.  If not, well, I&#8217;ll enjoy the ride while it lasts <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Claflin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93099</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Claflin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93099</guid>
		<description>I am really disappointed with Monday&#039;s line up. I love Heroes a lot. My favorite show out there. I am afraid of the 8 pm time slot. there are a lot of competitors for the slot in other networks. Like others have said. Heroes needs to be moved back to 9 so then viewers can watch it and not be confused. I really hope this doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s going soon after a season because of a really bad time slot. They need to understand that certain time slots worked for certain return shows. Like Heroes staying at 9.Please all Heroes fan watch during the fall. I know I will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really disappointed with Monday&#8217;s line up. I love Heroes a lot. My favorite show out there. I am afraid of the 8 pm time slot. there are a lot of competitors for the slot in other networks. Like others have said. Heroes needs to be moved back to 9 so then viewers can watch it and not be confused. I really hope this doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s going soon after a season because of a really bad time slot. They need to understand that certain time slots worked for certain return shows. Like Heroes staying at 9.Please all Heroes fan watch during the fall. I know I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93070</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93070</guid>
		<description>Why aren&#039;t more of you upset by the apparent demise of MNIE, I realize that the show is not as good as it used to be, but it deserves more than being axed on a Part 1 episode. I mean really, P&amp;R over Earl...LOL...we&#039;ve already got an Office.

And in regards to Chuck, sure I like it fine, but they jumped the shark with this year&#039;s finale. They could have easily tied it up all neat and pretty like with that ep, but what they did instead was to basically open up a whole new can of worms...really, with it&#039;s fate hanging on by a string, the writers thought the best route was not to close it, but start it over from scratch. Face it, NBC didn&#039;t kill this one, the creative team did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t more of you upset by the apparent demise of MNIE, I realize that the show is not as good as it used to be, but it deserves more than being axed on a Part 1 episode. I mean really, P&amp;R over Earl&#8230;LOL&#8230;we&#8217;ve already got an Office.</p>
<p>And in regards to Chuck, sure I like it fine, but they jumped the shark with this year&#8217;s finale. They could have easily tied it up all neat and pretty like with that ep, but what they did instead was to basically open up a whole new can of worms&#8230;really, with it&#8217;s fate hanging on by a string, the writers thought the best route was not to close it, but start it over from scratch. Face it, NBC didn&#8217;t kill this one, the creative team did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93056</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93056</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant I don&#039;t think it matters where they winter Olympics are held. They won&#039;t beat summer, particularly a summer Olympics with Phelps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant I don&#8217;t think it matters where they winter Olympics are held. They won&#8217;t beat summer, particularly a summer Olympics with Phelps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich K</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93053</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93053</guid>
		<description>Julia - actually it makes a huge difference where the Olympics are held (yes the Summer Olympics do attract higher viewers).  The 2006 Winter Olympics had some events that were shown as much as 18 hours (with a minimum of several hours) after they occurred for those viewers in the Western U.S.  The 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City performed much better in ratings and NBC was #1 in the rankings for 17 consecutive nights and even had more viewers than FOX, CBS, and ABC combined on some nights.  45.6 million viewers watched the 2002 Opening Ceremonies and averaged 35.1 million viewers the opening weekend, which itself was 23% higher than 1998 opening weekend in Nagano, Japan (according to http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=3558).  

I just looked at NBC&#039;s Olympics website (www.nbcolympics.com) and almost every marquee event is in prime-time and will be seen live by at least half the U.S. depending on how NBC arranges its schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia &#8211; actually it makes a huge difference where the Olympics are held (yes the Summer Olympics do attract higher viewers).  The 2006 Winter Olympics had some events that were shown as much as 18 hours (with a minimum of several hours) after they occurred for those viewers in the Western U.S.  The 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City performed much better in ratings and NBC was #1 in the rankings for 17 consecutive nights and even had more viewers than FOX, CBS, and ABC combined on some nights.  45.6 million viewers watched the 2002 Opening Ceremonies and averaged 35.1 million viewers the opening weekend, which itself was 23% higher than 1998 opening weekend in Nagano, Japan (according to <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=3558" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=3558</a>).  </p>
<p>I just looked at NBC&#8217;s Olympics website (www.nbcolympics.com) and almost every marquee event is in prime-time and will be seen live by at least half the U.S. depending on how NBC arranges its schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93051</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93051</guid>
		<description>Chuck vs The Ratings, I don&#039;t think it matters where the Olympics are held. I&#039;m pretty sure summer Olympics are a bigger a draw than winter, particularly when there&#039;s someone like Phelps. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck vs The Ratings, I don&#8217;t think it matters where the Olympics are held. I&#8217;m pretty sure summer Olympics are a bigger a draw than winter, particularly when there&#8217;s someone like Phelps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fringefan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-28/#comment-93044</link>
		<dc:creator>Fringefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93044</guid>
		<description>NBC= Nothing Broadcasting Company!
NBC= Nothing But Clueless!
NBC= Nothing But Crap!
NBC= Nothing But Cheap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC= Nothing Broadcasting Company!<br />
NBC= Nothing But Clueless!<br />
NBC= Nothing But Crap!<br />
NBC= Nothing But Cheap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChucK Vs The Ratings</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-93043</link>
		<dc:creator>ChucK Vs The Ratings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93043</guid>
		<description>Go chuck..

I am really happy for Chuck and where NBC placed it.  Unlike the summer olympics the winter games are on North American soil(Canada, but the left coast), which should draw better.

It seems lke NBC is behind Chuck, this will be great for promos of Chuck.  No Christmas episode of chuck makes me happy, there is no way Chuck could top, &quot;Chuck vs Sanata clause&quot;, without jumping the shark.

Plus, the Winter games is a different demo then the summer games(as a Canadian, I like the winter games better), Snowboarding vs track, I think the winter games is more in Chucks Demo.

As to the long break, I could care less, I love &quot;Lost&quot; so this is par for the course..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go chuck..</p>
<p>I am really happy for Chuck and where NBC placed it.  Unlike the summer olympics the winter games are on North American soil(Canada, but the left coast), which should draw better.</p>
<p>It seems lke NBC is behind Chuck, this will be great for promos of Chuck.  No Christmas episode of chuck makes me happy, there is no way Chuck could top, &#8220;Chuck vs Sanata clause&#8221;, without jumping the shark.</p>
<p>Plus, the Winter games is a different demo then the summer games(as a Canadian, I like the winter games better), Snowboarding vs track, I think the winter games is more in Chucks Demo.</p>
<p>As to the long break, I could care less, I love &#8220;Lost&#8221; so this is par for the course..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-93013</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93013</guid>
		<description>Nick&#039;s at nickctv.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick&#8217;s at nickctv.wordpress.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lopan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-93011</link>
		<dc:creator>lopan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-93011</guid>
		<description>Can anyone give a link to Nick C blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone give a link to Nick C blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92951</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92951</guid>
		<description>I still beleive that CHUCK would be 1st off the bench if anything on Mon or Wed fails.  Any thoughts on the teasers leaked by JS? Just curious. 

I also really believe that the best thing for HEROES would be to hold it until midseason, but that is a personal opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still beleive that CHUCK would be 1st off the bench if anything on Mon or Wed fails.  Any thoughts on the teasers leaked by JS? Just curious. </p>
<p>I also really believe that the best thing for HEROES would be to hold it until midseason, but that is a personal opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some guy named John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92755</link>
		<dc:creator>Some guy named John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92755</guid>
		<description>@Chris, I watch Castle a few weeks back and like it but it got me thinking, It is basically just Bones.

I just read Nick C&#039;s blog and notice he had some Chuck news, about a new character to cause some (relationship?) trouble. Well with 10 months to iron out the details, NBC can rebuild the show and hopefully a new interest in people who may have dismissed it before. Certainly with the fans of BBT as it moves to a later time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris, I watch Castle a few weeks back and like it but it got me thinking, It is basically just Bones.</p>
<p>I just read Nick C&#8217;s blog and notice he had some Chuck news, about a new character to cause some (relationship?) trouble. Well with 10 months to iron out the details, NBC can rebuild the show and hopefully a new interest in people who may have dismissed it before. Certainly with the fans of BBT as it moves to a later time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92684</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92684</guid>
		<description>So basically Heroes and Chuck are used as placeholders for each other in order to save money and make each show seem more serialized. Good Move. Other returning shows that get a full year are Law &amp; Order, SVU, Southland, Parks, Office, Biggest Loser, and 30 Rock. By the way 30 Rock is NOT airing at midseason, it will probably begin in late October/early november when the SNL specials are done. My biggest thought is, what if Trauma or Parenthood do well, how will NBC make room for the series. Its likely that they will push there other new series Mercy, to a later date, as well as find a spot for their 13 episodes of Friday Night Lights. But Day one will likely stay intact, as will Chuck and Heroes. In retrospect its kind of better that Medium was axed by NBC and renewed by CBS. NBC never treated Medium with the respect it deserves, despite the series always being a reliable repalcement. Now CBS can air Medium with 22 episodes begining this fall in a better timeslot and NBC can try out its &quot;new&quot; and &quot;improved&quot; schedule that will likely once again fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically Heroes and Chuck are used as placeholders for each other in order to save money and make each show seem more serialized. Good Move. Other returning shows that get a full year are Law &amp; Order, SVU, Southland, Parks, Office, Biggest Loser, and 30 Rock. By the way 30 Rock is NOT airing at midseason, it will probably begin in late October/early november when the SNL specials are done. My biggest thought is, what if Trauma or Parenthood do well, how will NBC make room for the series. Its likely that they will push there other new series Mercy, to a later date, as well as find a spot for their 13 episodes of Friday Night Lights. But Day one will likely stay intact, as will Chuck and Heroes. In retrospect its kind of better that Medium was axed by NBC and renewed by CBS. NBC never treated Medium with the respect it deserves, despite the series always being a reliable repalcement. Now CBS can air Medium with 22 episodes begining this fall in a better timeslot and NBC can try out its &#8220;new&#8221; and &#8220;improved&#8221; schedule that will likely once again fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92673</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92673</guid>
		<description>@ some guy named John:

&quot;Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother… is all I can think of, maybe there is more?&quot;

I was talking to that about it with a friend.  Terminator almost made it batting 1.000 LOL.  I just gave Castle a try last week, and I must say, that show is going into my regular viewing.  The writing and characters are fantastic.  Any Chuck fan that doesn&#039;t watch Castle should.  You would really like it.  But I was also a big fan of Firefly too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ some guy named John:</p>
<p>&#8220;Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother… is all I can think of, maybe there is more?&#8221;</p>
<p>I was talking to that about it with a friend.  Terminator almost made it batting 1.000 LOL.  I just gave Castle a try last week, and I must say, that show is going into my regular viewing.  The writing and characters are fantastic.  Any Chuck fan that doesn&#8217;t watch Castle should.  You would really like it.  But I was also a big fan of Firefly too <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmellsLikeCoolness</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92586</link>
		<dc:creator>SmellsLikeCoolness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92586</guid>
		<description>Nick C,

Do you have any information about My Name Is Earl moving networks? Any idea if it&#039;s still an option and when we might know one way or another?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C,</p>
<p>Do you have any information about My Name Is Earl moving networks? Any idea if it&#8217;s still an option and when we might know one way or another?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92583</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92583</guid>
		<description>Seinfeld had a similar slow beginning as Chuck and went on to be one of the biggest shows of all time.

The issue here isn&#039;t quality television which Chuck has by the bucket loads, but rather, stupid television executives with their heads up their...

Chuck could be huge, but NBC doesn&#039;t know how to promote it or give it a decent chance to thrive in a time slot that makes sense.

There&#039;s no one at the network with any guts or vision.  Probably just mindless group think.  Considering they are in last place (I don&#039;t count CW), you would think that the leadership would try something fresh, new, exciting...dare I say, different.  Nope.  And not only are they sticking to the same formulas that have failed miserably, but they are doubling down by putting Leno on prime-time 5 days a week.  The stupidity is unfathomable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seinfeld had a similar slow beginning as Chuck and went on to be one of the biggest shows of all time.</p>
<p>The issue here isn&#8217;t quality television which Chuck has by the bucket loads, but rather, stupid television executives with their heads up their&#8230;</p>
<p>Chuck could be huge, but NBC doesn&#8217;t know how to promote it or give it a decent chance to thrive in a time slot that makes sense.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no one at the network with any guts or vision.  Probably just mindless group think.  Considering they are in last place (I don&#8217;t count CW), you would think that the leadership would try something fresh, new, exciting&#8230;dare I say, different.  Nope.  And not only are they sticking to the same formulas that have failed miserably, but they are doubling down by putting Leno on prime-time 5 days a week.  The stupidity is unfathomable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92554</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92554</guid>
		<description>dustin, the only reason you don&#039;t see me really attack people on here is because Bill and Robert delete those comments by me and then post things about something called &quot;behavior.&quot;

Uh, Whedon has writers everywhere from 24 to recently ended shows like BATTLE STAR GALACTICA.  If you name a good show, chances are pretty good one of the main writers there got their start with Whedon.  He deserves mad props for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dustin, the only reason you don&#8217;t see me really attack people on here is because Bill and Robert delete those comments by me and then post things about something called &#8220;behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, Whedon has writers everywhere from 24 to recently ended shows like BATTLE STAR GALACTICA.  If you name a good show, chances are pretty good one of the main writers there got their start with Whedon.  He deserves mad props for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92552</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92552</guid>
		<description>outside of football and the playoffs and the winter games, nbc will finish last once again. where have you gone nbc? where have you gone? YIKES!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>outside of football and the playoffs and the winter games, nbc will finish last once again. where have you gone nbc? where have you gone? YIKES!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UH</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92412</link>
		<dc:creator>UH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92412</guid>
		<description>Some guy named John : Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother… is all I can think of, maybe there is more?

So even &quot;supposedtobethenewhollywoodgodfahter&quot; Whedon wasn&#039;t able to save &quot;thankstoSummerGlauthisshithadsomeviewers&quot; TSCC :) and Summer was the best &quot;piece of asset&quot; of Firefly....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some guy named John : Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother… is all I can think of, maybe there is more?</p>
<p>So even &#8220;supposedtobethenewhollywoodgodfahter&#8221; Whedon wasn&#8217;t able to save &#8220;thankstoSummerGlauthisshithadsomeviewers&#8221; TSCC <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and Summer was the best &#8220;piece of asset&#8221; of Firefly&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92401</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92401</guid>
		<description>lopan, Internet popularity does not = TV viewing popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lopan, Internet popularity does not = TV viewing popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92391</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92391</guid>
		<description>lopan,

Popularity of all shows in one small and completely fixed group of the same households over and over (Nieslen) isn&#039;t really proof either I suppose.


The thing about Chuck is that the fans will do about anything to support the show, and money talks more than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lopan,</p>
<p>Popularity of all shows in one small and completely fixed group of the same households over and over (Nieslen) isn&#8217;t really proof either I suppose.</p>
<p>The thing about Chuck is that the fans will do about anything to support the show, and money talks more than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iheartchuck</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92386</link>
		<dc:creator>iheartchuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92386</guid>
		<description>well i&#039;m sure this has been mentioned but people need to stop worrying about the long hiatus. it sucks i know but many shows do it. some of my faves....lost, dexter, californication, and probably a few others. i always wait for and they always come back. long hiatus&#039; don&#039;t seem to affect them. so i know that chuck can pull it off!! so pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease stop worrying about that. let&#039;s worry about recruiting fans and making subway happy, which is what it comes down to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i&#8217;m sure this has been mentioned but people need to stop worrying about the long hiatus. it sucks i know but many shows do it. some of my faves&#8230;.lost, dexter, californication, and probably a few others. i always wait for and they always come back. long hiatus&#8217; don&#8217;t seem to affect them. so i know that chuck can pull it off!! so pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease stop worrying about that. let&#8217;s worry about recruiting fans and making subway happy, which is what it comes down to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lopan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92383</link>
		<dc:creator>lopan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92383</guid>
		<description>Popularity on one website or even the internet isn&#039;t really proof that something is more popular than it realy is.Don&#039;t know if Robert,Bill or Nick C agree or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popularity on one website or even the internet isn&#8217;t really proof that something is more popular than it realy is.Don&#8217;t know if Robert,Bill or Nick C agree or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some guy named John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92377</link>
		<dc:creator>Some guy named John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92377</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chorgan says:
May 20th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Anyone else notice that about 85-90% of the responses to NBC is in regard to Chuck? Now granted I understand that a lot of Chuck fan’s dominate the coversation, however does that not give you pause, that the Neilsen rating system is not working properly?&quot;

Well a few things to consider.

Neilsen has been doing ratings for over 75 years (guesstimate), and up until recently they were considered the only way a show could tell how well it did. Add in things like Cable becoming a powerhouse, Hulu and other network owned viewing options, and DVR then Nielsen gets harder to justify. In the coming years we may see shows stay on the air because of the sponsors and not the numbers, like Chuck.

Chucks fan base is very tech savvy, and apparently smart enough to goad sponsors to help pick up costs, GO team Chuck! Sorry I&#039;m just happy for my favorite show.

Most of CBS audience is over 50, not that NBC is much better but it is younger by a few years. CBS is having a good run with the &quot;who done it/mystery&quot; shows like CSI. Sooner or later the interest will fade away.

Other stations like Fox and ABC are living on the reality shows that are holding up the rest of their numbers... American Idol props the whole network up a bunch. Take it away and it might make sense why a shows like Dollhouse and Castle got renewed for a second season.

Side note

Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother... is all I can think of, maybe there is more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chorgan says:<br />
May 20th, 2009 at 2:16 pm</p>
<p>Anyone else notice that about 85-90% of the responses to NBC is in regard to Chuck? Now granted I understand that a lot of Chuck fan’s dominate the coversation, however does that not give you pause, that the Neilsen rating system is not working properly?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well a few things to consider.</p>
<p>Neilsen has been doing ratings for over 75 years (guesstimate), and up until recently they were considered the only way a show could tell how well it did. Add in things like Cable becoming a powerhouse, Hulu and other network owned viewing options, and DVR then Nielsen gets harder to justify. In the coming years we may see shows stay on the air because of the sponsors and not the numbers, like Chuck.</p>
<p>Chucks fan base is very tech savvy, and apparently smart enough to goad sponsors to help pick up costs, GO team Chuck! Sorry I&#8217;m just happy for my favorite show.</p>
<p>Most of CBS audience is over 50, not that NBC is much better but it is younger by a few years. CBS is having a good run with the &#8220;who done it/mystery&#8221; shows like CSI. Sooner or later the interest will fade away.</p>
<p>Other stations like Fox and ABC are living on the reality shows that are holding up the rest of their numbers&#8230; American Idol props the whole network up a bunch. Take it away and it might make sense why a shows like Dollhouse and Castle got renewed for a second season.</p>
<p>Side note</p>
<p>Anyone realize most of the shows with a someone who has worked with Joss Whedon in the past or currently have been renewed, like Chuck, Bones, Castle, Family Guy, Dollhouse, and How I met Your Mother&#8230; is all I can think of, maybe there is more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92344</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92344</guid>
		<description>Anyone else notice that about 85-90% of the responses to NBC is in regard to Chuck? Now granted I understand that a lot of Chuck fan&#039;s dominate the coversation, however does that not give you pause, that the Neilsen rating system is not working properly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else notice that about 85-90% of the responses to NBC is in regard to Chuck? Now granted I understand that a lot of Chuck fan&#8217;s dominate the coversation, however does that not give you pause, that the Neilsen rating system is not working properly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92322</link>
		<dc:creator>mwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92322</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up Chorgan! I actually like sarcasm, so am sorry I missed it. Sarcasm does not work as well on boards.  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up Chorgan! I actually like sarcasm, so am sorry I missed it. Sarcasm does not work as well on boards.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92312</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92312</guid>
		<description>Nick C is a great resource.  I have never seen him personally attack anyone.  Though he may disagree with their content, he is always very clear about what he &#039;attacks.&#039;  Though . . . on a side note I also think 22 episodes of Chuck is going to happen, but that is just a &#039;hunch.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C is a great resource.  I have never seen him personally attack anyone.  Though he may disagree with their content, he is always very clear about what he &#8216;attacks.&#8217;  Though . . . on a side note I also think 22 episodes of Chuck is going to happen, but that is just a &#8216;hunch.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92308</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92308</guid>
		<description>I think the Leno move will be a huge stumbling block for the Network. However, I agree and think that if Chuck maintains it&#039;s veiwership (HEAR THAT CHUCK FANS) than the Back 9 is almost a slam dunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Leno move will be a huge stumbling block for the Network. However, I agree and think that if Chuck maintains it&#8217;s veiwership (HEAR THAT CHUCK FANS) than the Back 9 is almost a slam dunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-27/#comment-92307</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92307</guid>
		<description>mwa, I never said my salary anywhere.  I&#039;m sorry you have reading comprehension problems and get mad for no reason at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mwa, I never said my salary anywhere.  I&#8217;m sorry you have reading comprehension problems and get mad for no reason at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92306</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92306</guid>
		<description>mwa that was me and not Nick C. : I was being sarcastic, I was labeling myself as a demographic hence the age range and salary :) Sarcasm doesn&#039;t come across to well on the internet. 

But I still think that this might be medium&#039;s last season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mwa that was me and not Nick C. : I was being sarcastic, I was labeling myself as a demographic hence the age range and salary <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Sarcasm doesn&#8217;t come across to well on the internet. </p>
<p>But I still think that this might be medium&#8217;s last season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92297</link>
		<dc:creator>mwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92297</guid>
		<description>Nick C, thanks for eltting us know what your salary is. It is almost important.

Have a wonderful day, and I am sorry you take things personally and need to defend yourself and slam other shows.

That is too bad.

So is insecurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C, thanks for eltting us know what your salary is. It is almost important.</p>
<p>Have a wonderful day, and I am sorry you take things personally and need to defend yourself and slam other shows.</p>
<p>That is too bad.</p>
<p>So is insecurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92295</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92295</guid>
		<description>dustin, I make mistakes too.  Scroll up to the top of this, I made mistakes when all I had to do was read the damn Press Release (but I was too lazy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dustin, I make mistakes too.  Scroll up to the top of this, I made mistakes when all I had to do was read the damn Press Release (but I was too lazy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92294</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92294</guid>
		<description>Chorgan, I can&#039;t guess without know what NBC is pulling as a whole next season.  I&#039;m going to go out on a limb and think that a 2.2 will look good thanks to LENO, but I think that NBC is going to bite the bullet.  They&#039;ll hope that CHUCK can pick up viewers in the summer with no competition and no regular viewing habits.  Which would be a smart move.  It will definitely make SUBWAY happy since they&#039;re investing so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chorgan, I can&#8217;t guess without know what NBC is pulling as a whole next season.  I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb and think that a 2.2 will look good thanks to LENO, but I think that NBC is going to bite the bullet.  They&#8217;ll hope that CHUCK can pick up viewers in the summer with no competition and no regular viewing habits.  Which would be a smart move.  It will definitely make SUBWAY happy since they&#8217;re investing so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92276</guid>
		<description>Nick C. I had a question from earlier that was directed to you:

Nick C. what would you say the chances of Chuck getting the back 9 pick up. Gut feeling?

I know that there are some big &quot;ifs&quot; and &quot;buts.&quot; Let&#039;s just assume that the ratings are maintained or maybe even slightly lower, average around 2.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C. I had a question from earlier that was directed to you:</p>
<p>Nick C. what would you say the chances of Chuck getting the back 9 pick up. Gut feeling?</p>
<p>I know that there are some big &#8220;ifs&#8221; and &#8220;buts.&#8221; Let&#8217;s just assume that the ratings are maintained or maybe even slightly lower, average around 2.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92274</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92274</guid>
		<description>That last comment came out sounding different then I intended, it was supposed to sound like a compliment.  For the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last comment came out sounding different then I intended, it was supposed to sound like a compliment.  For the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92273</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92273</guid>
		<description>Nick C should just blog with himself.  Really, sincerely, he knows more then the rest of us yahoos.  I think I will just start saying crap, so he can correct me and then i&#039;ll know the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick C should just blog with himself.  Really, sincerely, he knows more then the rest of us yahoos.  I think I will just start saying crap, so he can correct me and then i&#8217;ll know the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92265</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92265</guid>
		<description>mwa, actually FOX is the top rated network and it was a horrible move by CBS.  NBC should pick up 11TH HOUR and taunt CBS when that pulls the same numbers for them (and thus a hit for NBC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mwa, actually FOX is the top rated network and it was a horrible move by CBS.  NBC should pick up 11TH HOUR and taunt CBS when that pulls the same numbers for them (and thus a hit for NBC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92259</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92259</guid>
		<description>mwa- No thank you for being so positive in your musings about a tv show. Really I don&#039;t think that I could go a day with out your little rays of sunshine!

I think that it is hilarious that Medium got partnered with Ghost Whisperer. GW jumped the shark a bit and I am thinking that you&#039;ll see a rating decline, they won&#039;t hold over from GW to Medium so good luck with that. I&#039;m personally not a big fan of either show, but I would pick Ghost Nightie over Medium, but hey that is just me I am just a guy 18-49 with over $70,000 in income. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mwa- No thank you for being so positive in your musings about a tv show. Really I don&#8217;t think that I could go a day with out your little rays of sunshine!</p>
<p>I think that it is hilarious that Medium got partnered with Ghost Whisperer. GW jumped the shark a bit and I am thinking that you&#8217;ll see a rating decline, they won&#8217;t hold over from GW to Medium so good luck with that. I&#8217;m personally not a big fan of either show, but I would pick Ghost Nightie over Medium, but hey that is just me I am just a guy 18-49 with over $70,000 in income. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92234</link>
		<dc:creator>mwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92234</guid>
		<description>Sorry BIck C, I posted that minutes before the news broke.

I do HAVE to say this, and please know that I DO watch Chuck and DO enjoy it:

All those Chuck fans creating the whole Chuck versus Medium thing are the ones who did not get the better deal…Chuck is still on NBC for a few 13 eps next year, in the winter, and Medium gets a 22 episode full season order on a the TOP RATED network and will be back in the Fall.

So, thank you to Chuck fans! Your internet oush really helped out ‘Medium’ fans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry BIck C, I posted that minutes before the news broke.</p>
<p>I do HAVE to say this, and please know that I DO watch Chuck and DO enjoy it:</p>
<p>All those Chuck fans creating the whole Chuck versus Medium thing are the ones who did not get the better deal…Chuck is still on NBC for a few 13 eps next year, in the winter, and Medium gets a 22 episode full season order on a the TOP RATED network and will be back in the Fall.</p>
<p>So, thank you to Chuck fans! Your internet oush really helped out ‘Medium’ fans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92180</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92180</guid>
		<description>Sarah&#039;s a Hottie, it was either Friday or mid-season in a non-death time slot.  I prefer the mid-season start.  There are a lot of reasons why CHUCK can survive, and if it&#039;s successful right out of the gate it will likely get a quick order on the back 9, which means it will also get renewed for Spring 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah&#8217;s a Hottie, it was either Friday or mid-season in a non-death time slot.  I prefer the mid-season start.  There are a lot of reasons why CHUCK can survive, and if it&#8217;s successful right out of the gate it will likely get a quick order on the back 9, which means it will also get renewed for Spring 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92155</guid>
		<description>If they didn&#039;t like the show, I don&#039;t think that we would see at all anywhere on the schedule. But they do like the show, so we see it where it is. 

I am convinced, that the suits at NBC do see the potential for Chuck. And thast they are giving Chuck a legit shot. Look at it like a football game.

Chuck was well received during season one building momentum, then the writers strike forces them to punt. Season 2 they get the ball back, and Obama and BBT play stout defence and force a turnover.

So this is halftime, there is still plenty of game left to play, they get the ball back to start the half. It is up to them to score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they didn&#8217;t like the show, I don&#8217;t think that we would see at all anywhere on the schedule. But they do like the show, so we see it where it is. </p>
<p>I am convinced, that the suits at NBC do see the potential for Chuck. And thast they are giving Chuck a legit shot. Look at it like a football game.</p>
<p>Chuck was well received during season one building momentum, then the writers strike forces them to punt. Season 2 they get the ball back, and Obama and BBT play stout defence and force a turnover.</p>
<p>So this is halftime, there is still plenty of game left to play, they get the ball back to start the half. It is up to them to score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckNut</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92142</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92142</guid>
		<description>thanks for the optimism, chorgan! with your (and others&#039;) help, hopefully i&#039;ll get there soon myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the optimism, chorgan! with your (and others&#8217;) help, hopefully i&#8217;ll get there soon myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorgan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92114</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92114</guid>
		<description>ChuckNut- I am trying to give BS the benefit of the doubt, but I think he sees the potential in Chuck, I really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChuckNut- I am trying to give BS the benefit of the doubt, but I think he sees the potential in Chuck, I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckNut</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/05/19/nbc-2009-2010-schedule/19031/comment-page-26/#comment-92070</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=19031#comment-92070</guid>
		<description>gary, http://nickctv.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary, <a href="http://nickctv.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://nickctv.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

