<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Ratings: ABC, NBA Finals, Lakers Crush Rivals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-2/#comment-99225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-99225</guid>
		<description>I think regular tv programs stink that why i watch cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think regular tv programs stink that why i watch cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-2/#comment-98134</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-98134</guid>
		<description>I just found out that So You Think You Can Dance increased from the equivalent airing last year. Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out that So You Think You Can Dance increased from the equivalent airing last year. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-2/#comment-98011</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-98011</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Magic/Lakers matchup is holding up well, ( and of course we&#039;ll never know how a Cav/Lakers matchup would have done.) BTW, if I was Kimmel&#039;s agent in Jeremy Piven mode, I&#039;d say, look here, fellas, Jimmy&#039;s put in the time. Paired with whatshisnose on the Man Show? Dating Sarah Silverman? Now sentenced to late late purgatory! How bout an hour a week to do a Rome is Burning, Best Sports Show Ever style gig at ten against old lantern jaw Leno? Grab a little 18-35 and 18-49 male meat? Huh? Huh? How bout it?? ... Isn&#039;t that how agents talk? Mr. Kimmel, you can thank me with an autographed glamor pic ... of Sarah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Magic/Lakers matchup is holding up well, ( and of course we&#8217;ll never know how a Cav/Lakers matchup would have done.) BTW, if I was Kimmel&#8217;s agent in Jeremy Piven mode, I&#8217;d say, look here, fellas, Jimmy&#8217;s put in the time. Paired with whatshisnose on the Man Show? Dating Sarah Silverman? Now sentenced to late late purgatory! How bout an hour a week to do a Rome is Burning, Best Sports Show Ever style gig at ten against old lantern jaw Leno? Grab a little 18-35 and 18-49 male meat? Huh? Huh? How bout it?? &#8230; Isn&#8217;t that how agents talk? Mr. Kimmel, you can thank me with an autographed glamor pic &#8230; of Sarah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-2/#comment-98001</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-98001</guid>
		<description>Could NBC executives be even more content considering The Listener&#039;s audience grew for the second half hour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could NBC executives be even more content considering The Listener&#8217;s audience grew for the second half hour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Junkie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97993</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97993</guid>
		<description>NBC is so stupid man. Why did they put the listener until 10 pm and up against the Mentalist, plus they are showing a bunch of stupid reruns. I am sure it can do way better in another time slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC is so stupid man. Why did they put the listener until 10 pm and up against the Mentalist, plus they are showing a bunch of stupid reruns. I am sure it can do way better in another time slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97982</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97982</guid>
		<description>Im thinking the same as you. they must be content but it would have been nice if it was getting over a 2.0 for each ep. so do u think they will go with it next summer?

i havent seen an entire episode and dont plan on doing so. i think the UK is slightly better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im thinking the same as you. they must be content but it would have been nice if it was getting over a 2.0 for each ep. so do u think they will go with it next summer?</p>
<p>i havent seen an entire episode and dont plan on doing so. i think the UK is slightly better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97976</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97976</guid>
		<description>Sean, my guess is that so far NBC is probably very content with the results. Not ecstatic, but content. They have a bunch of hours of programming that were really cheap (and likely made even cheaper since MTV is rebroadcasting them) and through the first 7 airings on NBC it had more than a 2.0 rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, my guess is that so far NBC is probably very content with the results. Not ecstatic, but content. They have a bunch of hours of programming that were really cheap (and likely made even cheaper since MTV is rebroadcasting them) and through the first 7 airings on NBC it had more than a 2.0 rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97973</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97973</guid>
		<description>I cant believe the Listener did so horrible!!! NBC is stupid for putting repeats in front of a neew episode. NBC is just plain stupid, with the IACGMOOH on four nights a week and the jay leno show in the fall. The network will never be number 1 again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe the Listener did so horrible!!! NBC is stupid for putting repeats in front of a neew episode. NBC is just plain stupid, with the IACGMOOH on four nights a week and the jay leno show in the fall. The network will never be number 1 again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97970</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97970</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

Do you think NBC are happy with I&#039;m a Celebrity numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>Do you think NBC are happy with I&#8217;m a Celebrity numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97958</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97958</guid>
		<description>FYI, there were quite a few politically themed comments in this post which I have removed as they were inappropriate here.  But, I also might have accidentally deleted a couple of other comments that were appropriate in the process. If so, I apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, there were quite a few politically themed comments in this post which I have removed as they were inappropriate here.  But, I also might have accidentally deleted a couple of other comments that were appropriate in the process. If so, I apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97895</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97895</guid>
		<description>So You Think You Can Dance held its own against the NBA Finals again, I suppose you can argue that&#039;s a good sign for its jump to the Fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So You Think You Can Dance held its own against the NBA Finals again, I suppose you can argue that&#8217;s a good sign for its jump to the Fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Cal</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97893</link>
		<dc:creator>So Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97893</guid>
		<description>Those Mentalist numbers are off from Tuesday repeats...hope CBS doesn&#039;t end up regretting moving it to the post-CSI timeslot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Mentalist numbers are off from Tuesday repeats&#8230;hope CBS doesn&#8217;t end up regretting moving it to the post-CSI timeslot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97886</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97886</guid>
		<description>Dennis, the Jimmy Kimmel numbers for 8pm-8:30 are correct at least based on the fast national reports we have access to. how much they will change in the final numbers, I can&#039;t say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, the Jimmy Kimmel numbers for 8pm-8:30 are correct at least based on the fast national reports we have access to. how much they will change in the final numbers, I can&#8217;t say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97883</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97883</guid>
		<description>Robert: Thanks, I figured it was still the formatting issue.  Hopefully you guys will be able to work something out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert: Thanks, I figured it was still the formatting issue.  Hopefully you guys will be able to work something out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97880</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97880</guid>
		<description>Kimmel should put together a better primetime show since it&#039;s getting a lot of exposure in that timeslot.  The last two have been really boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimmel should put together a better primetime show since it&#8217;s getting a lot of exposure in that timeslot.  The last two have been really boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97877</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97877</guid>
		<description>Anon: 1.) it&#039;s not that we&#039;re not posting the cable news data anymore, it&#039;s been that we&#039;ve been receiving it a format that is not usable for us.  We are working on the issue and I&#039;m not yet sure how it will resolve.  2.) according to NBC, Conan still looks poised to win last night&#039;s numbers where it matters -- with 18-49 year olds. NBC sampled 21 of its markets that they think lead to a good projection of the finals, and there Conan was ahead 1.5 to .9.  There&#039;s a post about it elsewhere on the site now, but I only just now got it posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon: 1.) it&#8217;s not that we&#8217;re not posting the cable news data anymore, it&#8217;s been that we&#8217;ve been receiving it a format that is not usable for us.  We are working on the issue and I&#8217;m not yet sure how it will resolve.  2.) according to NBC, Conan still looks poised to win last night&#8217;s numbers where it matters &#8212; with 18-49 year olds. NBC sampled 21 of its markets that they think lead to a good projection of the finals, and there Conan was ahead 1.5 to .9.  There&#8217;s a post about it elsewhere on the site now, but I only just now got it posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: super goooo!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97874</link>
		<dc:creator>super goooo!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97874</guid>
		<description>its always a pleasure watch a repeat of SUPERNATURAL! did i see an improvement of the show in the 18-34/18-49 from smallville?? 
can someone tell me when  dawn ostroff has been nominated president on the cw, and when she leaves her job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its always a pleasure watch a repeat of SUPERNATURAL! did i see an improvement of the show in the 18-34/18-49 from smallville??<br />
can someone tell me when  dawn ostroff has been nominated president on the cw, and when she leaves her job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97873</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97873</guid>
		<description>Letterman beat Conan quite handily

In late-night metered market ratings, CBS&#039;s &quot;Letterman&quot; (3.5/8) took the the top spot, defeating ABC&#039;s &quot;Nightline&quot; (2.8/8) and NBC&#039;s &quot;Conan&quot; (3.0/7). Rounding out the night then were &quot;Kimmel&quot; (1.7/7) on ABC &quot;Ferguson&quot; (1.6/5) on CBS and &quot;Fallon&quot; (1.5/5) and &quot;Daly&quot; (0.9/4) on NBC.

(Conan&#039;s show was awful last night - so boring)

(courtesy FutonCritic)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letterman beat Conan quite handily</p>
<p>In late-night metered market ratings, CBS&#8217;s &#8220;Letterman&#8221; (3.5/8) took the the top spot, defeating ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Nightline&#8221; (2.8/8) and NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Conan&#8221; (3.0/7). Rounding out the night then were &#8220;Kimmel&#8221; (1.7/7) on ABC &#8220;Ferguson&#8221; (1.6/5) on CBS and &#8220;Fallon&#8221; (1.5/5) and &#8220;Daly&#8221; (0.9/4) on NBC.</p>
<p>(Conan&#8217;s show was awful last night &#8211; so boring)</p>
<p>(courtesy FutonCritic)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97871</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Celebrity... is horribly in both quality and ratings. In other words, it falls right in line with NBC&#039;s programing standards.

I&#039;d bet that the only reason NBC has dedicated such a huge chunk of airtime to this clunker is to prepare people for Leno. As mediocre as Leno is, he&#039;ll seem like a breath of fresh air compared to this show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Celebrity&#8230; is horribly in both quality and ratings. In other words, it falls right in line with NBC&#8217;s programing standards.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d bet that the only reason NBC has dedicated such a huge chunk of airtime to this clunker is to prepare people for Leno. As mediocre as Leno is, he&#8217;ll seem like a breath of fresh air compared to this show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97870</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97870</guid>
		<description>What we need are the Conan/Letterman numbers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we need are the Conan/Letterman numbers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97869</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97869</guid>
		<description>IACGMOOH is a cheap show, i&#039;m betting it will return next summer, hopefully with real celebrities:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IACGMOOH is a cheap show, i&#8217;m betting it will return next summer, hopefully with real celebrities:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97868</guid>
		<description>Jimmy Kimmel Live 	3.2/11 	3.1/2
that can&#039;t be right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy Kimmel Live 	3.2/11 	3.1/2<br />
that can&#8217;t be right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97867</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97867</guid>
		<description>Sorry this is a little off topic - but are you guys not posting the cable news ratings anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry this is a little off topic &#8211; but are you guys not posting the cable news ratings anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy B.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547/comment-page-1/#comment-97866</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/12/updated-thursday-ratings-abc-nba-finals-lakers-crush-rivals/20547#comment-97866</guid>
		<description>Watched the Supernatural repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the Supernatural repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

