<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollhouse Had Largest Share of Viewing From DVRs, Did That Save The Show?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-101491</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101491</guid>
		<description>Just in case anyone has any doubts about LG&#039;s grasp of reality: I &quot;hate Dollhouse&quot; and &quot;love T:SCC&quot; about as much as LG had access to season finale scripts for the latter.

I made the mistake some time ago of referencing LG&#039;s &quot;T:SCC canceled&quot; hoax (T:SCC was eventually canceled, but it&#039;s fair to say LG&#039;s story was fiction) when I tried to persuade DH fans it was not a good idea to hitch DH&#039;s fortunes to a sinking ship. As a result, nothing I said was taken seriously, even though the central point, that T:SCC was a sinking ship regardless of whether LG was trolling or not, was obviously correct.

I&#039;ve made it clear I don&#039;t trust LG&#039;s posts, and as a result LG insists on treating me as a fan of T:SCC, a show I&#039;ve attacked since the second season started last year.

I normally make it a policy not to respond to LG, but in this case I&#039;ll make an exception if only to ensure nobody else makes the same stupid error I did and in case there&#039;s anyone stupid enough to actually think I really hate DH, a show I&#039;ve been raving about since Ep. 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case anyone has any doubts about LG&#8217;s grasp of reality: I &#8220;hate Dollhouse&#8221; and &#8220;love T:SCC&#8221; about as much as LG had access to season finale scripts for the latter.</p>
<p>I made the mistake some time ago of referencing LG&#8217;s &#8220;T:SCC canceled&#8221; hoax (T:SCC was eventually canceled, but it&#8217;s fair to say LG&#8217;s story was fiction) when I tried to persuade DH fans it was not a good idea to hitch DH&#8217;s fortunes to a sinking ship. As a result, nothing I said was taken seriously, even though the central point, that T:SCC was a sinking ship regardless of whether LG was trolling or not, was obviously correct.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made it clear I don&#8217;t trust LG&#8217;s posts, and as a result LG insists on treating me as a fan of T:SCC, a show I&#8217;ve attacked since the second season started last year.</p>
<p>I normally make it a policy not to respond to LG, but in this case I&#8217;ll make an exception if only to ensure nobody else makes the same stupid error I did and in case there&#8217;s anyone stupid enough to actually think I really hate DH, a show I&#8217;ve been raving about since Ep. 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-101482</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101482</guid>
		<description>@squiggleslash

The only people that rabidly hate Dollhouse are you and the other 43 active (I&#039;ll be nice here) Terminatorwiki &quot;fans&quot;. 

Dollhouse will be fine.

Apparently the people that mattered thought DH was a better show with more potential and the DH fans obviously communicated a stronger desire to keep their show :)

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@squiggleslash</p>
<p>The only people that rabidly hate Dollhouse are you and the other 43 active (I&#8217;ll be nice here) Terminatorwiki &#8220;fans&#8221;. </p>
<p>Dollhouse will be fine.</p>
<p>Apparently the people that mattered thought DH was a better show with more potential and the DH fans obviously communicated a stronger desire to keep their show <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-100778</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100778</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s actually a fun part of this.  it&#039;s rare for a summer date to mean a lot for the fall schedule.  DVD sales are down across the industry.  if dollhouse hits the numbers the fans expect, fox will have no choice but to be impressed.

there is, of course, another scenario.  one of the telling weaknesses of dollhouse is that even the whedonesque.com hard-core whedonites are kind of split on dollhouse.  that&#039;s like the republican presidential candidate struggling to win south carolina.

if dvd sales disappoint, i think we can all agree, it&#039;s over.  but they might not.  it&#039;s good when the people decide, not a few executives in a room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s actually a fun part of this.  it&#8217;s rare for a summer date to mean a lot for the fall schedule.  DVD sales are down across the industry.  if dollhouse hits the numbers the fans expect, fox will have no choice but to be impressed.</p>
<p>there is, of course, another scenario.  one of the telling weaknesses of dollhouse is that even the whedonesque.com hard-core whedonites are kind of split on dollhouse.  that&#8217;s like the republican presidential candidate struggling to win south carolina.</p>
<p>if dvd sales disappoint, i think we can all agree, it&#8217;s over.  but they might not.  it&#8217;s good when the people decide, not a few executives in a room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greennogo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-100757</link>
		<dc:creator>greennogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100757</guid>
		<description>I think DVD sales will be pretty strong in spite of the fact that the price tag is a bit high for less than the full contingent of 22 episodes. A lot of people want to see the now mythic &quot;Epitaph One&quot; episode and the pre network notes original &quot;Echo&quot; 1st episode. (And if &quot;Echo&quot; matches the script that&#039;s out there, it&#039;ll only reinforce the perception that Joss was forced to &#039;dumb it down&#039; over the first five episodes for the network.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DVD sales will be pretty strong in spite of the fact that the price tag is a bit high for less than the full contingent of 22 episodes. A lot of people want to see the now mythic &#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; episode and the pre network notes original &#8220;Echo&#8221; 1st episode. (And if &#8220;Echo&#8221; matches the script that&#8217;s out there, it&#8217;ll only reinforce the perception that Joss was forced to &#8216;dumb it down&#8217; over the first five episodes for the network.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-100756</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100756</guid>
		<description>freeman - The reason I didn&#039;t raise the issue of the poor lead in was because I already had taken it into account. Dollhouse ended the season on a 1.0, while it was being paired with Prison Break and after it had already run into the start of the summer season. I don&#039;t see any synergies between PB and Dollhouse, and even if there are some, the start of the summer season will have wiped out any meager benefits it might have gotten from PB. In the end, I think the vast majority of people watching the last three episodes of Dollhouse watched it by turning on the TV at 9 and/or tuning to Fox at 9.

So from my point of view, it&#039;s highly improbable that ratings will get worse unless the show itself gets worse. But I don&#039;t think 1.0-1.2 is sustainable in the long term for the reasons you point out. It just takes Fox to get a pilot for a show it thinks can make it on a Friday and which doesn&#039;t cost substantially more, and Fox has to consider other things to do with Dollhouse.

The good news (from my point of view) is that there are more options with Dollhouse than there were with T:SCC. T:SCC was so expensive, and DVD sales so poor, that moving it to another network was never an option. Dollhouse may be able to move, if DVD sales are at least reasonable. I&#039;m just not confident they will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freeman &#8211; The reason I didn&#8217;t raise the issue of the poor lead in was because I already had taken it into account. Dollhouse ended the season on a 1.0, while it was being paired with Prison Break and after it had already run into the start of the summer season. I don&#8217;t see any synergies between PB and Dollhouse, and even if there are some, the start of the summer season will have wiped out any meager benefits it might have gotten from PB. In the end, I think the vast majority of people watching the last three episodes of Dollhouse watched it by turning on the TV at 9 and/or tuning to Fox at 9.</p>
<p>So from my point of view, it&#8217;s highly improbable that ratings will get worse unless the show itself gets worse. But I don&#8217;t think 1.0-1.2 is sustainable in the long term for the reasons you point out. It just takes Fox to get a pilot for a show it thinks can make it on a Friday and which doesn&#8217;t cost substantially more, and Fox has to consider other things to do with Dollhouse.</p>
<p>The good news (from my point of view) is that there are more options with Dollhouse than there were with T:SCC. T:SCC was so expensive, and DVD sales so poor, that moving it to another network was never an option. Dollhouse may be able to move, if DVD sales are at least reasonable. I&#8217;m just not confident they will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-100743</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100743</guid>
		<description>oh, the other huge factor is fox&#039;s pilots.  the second-season pickup for dollhouse was clearly in part a reflection of fox&#039;s pilot season wiping out.  it&#039;s only a matter of time before someone makes a pilot that fox is willing to make the centerpiece of its new friday night.  

once that happens, the ride is over for dollhouse fans.  kevin reilly might be content to break even with a cheap sci-fi show in the short run, but in the long run, he wants to build a dominant night, and he knows dollhouse will never be part of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, the other huge factor is fox&#8217;s pilots.  the second-season pickup for dollhouse was clearly in part a reflection of fox&#8217;s pilot season wiping out.  it&#8217;s only a matter of time before someone makes a pilot that fox is willing to make the centerpiece of its new friday night.  </p>
<p>once that happens, the ride is over for dollhouse fans.  kevin reilly might be content to break even with a cheap sci-fi show in the short run, but in the long run, he wants to build a dominant night, and he knows dollhouse will never be part of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-5/#comment-100738</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100738</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s actually an excellent analysis by squiggleslash.  it looks like we&#039;re getting ready to stop wasting this site&#039;s bandwidth.  he&#039;s a fan and i&#039;m not, but i agree with most of what he said.

the thing i&#039;d say he forgot is what most fans forget: the effect of other shows.  there&#039;s no way that horrible lead-in sitcom hour will deliver the closely-matched audience that sarah connor did for the first nine episodes.  fox ruled sunday night for years with the simpsons/x-files tag team, but animation is different.  animation nerds and sci-fi nerds are two mutations of the same family tree.  friday night has no synergy.  dollhouse&#039;s ratings will inescapably go down.

and, i&#039;m not sure how big this will be, but nbc even scheduled a show at 9, medium, that might actually peel off some of dollhouse&#039;s fringe-y audience, which can&#039;t lose a single person as it stands.  

i think we all agree, the prognosis is not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s actually an excellent analysis by squiggleslash.  it looks like we&#8217;re getting ready to stop wasting this site&#8217;s bandwidth.  he&#8217;s a fan and i&#8217;m not, but i agree with most of what he said.</p>
<p>the thing i&#8217;d say he forgot is what most fans forget: the effect of other shows.  there&#8217;s no way that horrible lead-in sitcom hour will deliver the closely-matched audience that sarah connor did for the first nine episodes.  fox ruled sunday night for years with the simpsons/x-files tag team, but animation is different.  animation nerds and sci-fi nerds are two mutations of the same family tree.  friday night has no synergy.  dollhouse&#8217;s ratings will inescapably go down.</p>
<p>and, i&#8217;m not sure how big this will be, but nbc even scheduled a show at 9, medium, that might actually peel off some of dollhouse&#8217;s fringe-y audience, which can&#8217;t lose a single person as it stands.  </p>
<p>i think we all agree, the prognosis is not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100730</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100730</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone can say for definite what&#039;s going to happen with Dollhouse, but I&#039;d say the logic probably works like this:

1. Most likely

Ratings stay flat, DVD sales low, show canceled most probably after 13 episodes, though possibly allowed to lumber on, T:SCC style, to end on a full season if Fox sees it as better than cheap filler material.

I think ratings will stay flat because I&#039;m finding people actually hate the show. I don&#039;t mean in an American Idol type way, I mean as in I&#039;ve defended it before and been treated as if I just said Hitler is a pretty cool guy. I mean that literally, you have no idea how hysterial people are in their hatred of Dollhouse. The fact it portrays an evil system dispassionately, and the people running it as human beings rather than evil archetypes, really rubs critics up the wrong way. I love the show for those strengths, but alas I think it&#039;s too complex for general audiences to appreciate. Add to that the fact it&#039;s already not attracted a large audience, and the issues others have raised about the &quot;main character&quot; not being identifiable, and you don&#039;t have something that has a large pull.

DVD sales will be low partially for the above, and partially because the DVD set is relatively expensive for relatively little. $32 is the heavily discounted price. It&#039;s not even on my wait order list, and I love the show.

2. Second most likely

Ratings remain low, but DVD sales are good. Fox finishes series 2 (including mid-season pick-up), with S3 onwards moved to FX

I&#039;ve already explained why I think ratings will remain low. There&#039;s more of a chance I&#039;m wrong on DVD sales, largely because the DVD set contains some extras many fans will feel are critical, in much the same way that fans of Firefly felt obliged to buy the DVD set because it had content missing from the network run.

Why finish the series and put S3 on FX? Well, if DVD sales are high, and ratings don&#039;t go lower, then there may well be enough of an audience to justify showing the show on cable especially as the cost is low and the DVD sales will help drive up revenues. Dollhouse would also appear to fit some of FX&#039;s demographic. Why bother canceling it if the show is ultimately profitable? It&#039;s better to find a way to keep making the show, it&#039;s just putting it on Fox with such low ratings makes no sense.

3. Third most likely

Ratings go up, DVD sales are high. Show continues to limp on, with a third season commissioned for the Fox Network.

I think both are improbable but if somehow ratings improve, I can see Fox renewing the series as they don&#039;t have much of a justification for not doing so.

4. Fourth most likely: Ratings plummet. DVD sales low. Show is canceled after seven or eight episodes.

Highly improbable. I think Dollhouse has attracted a base of strong fans, so I don&#039;t see Dollhouse dropping below the 1.0 it ended the first season on. But it&#039;s also possible the second season will stink.


Me, I&#039;m hoping for the second or third most likely scenarios. I just don&#039;t see either as particularly likely. I don&#039;t think ratings will go above a 1.2, and I don&#039;t think DVD sales are going to be particularly good. But I&#039;d be delighted to be proven wrong, as the show&#039;s awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can say for definite what&#8217;s going to happen with Dollhouse, but I&#8217;d say the logic probably works like this:</p>
<p>1. Most likely</p>
<p>Ratings stay flat, DVD sales low, show canceled most probably after 13 episodes, though possibly allowed to lumber on, T:SCC style, to end on a full season if Fox sees it as better than cheap filler material.</p>
<p>I think ratings will stay flat because I&#8217;m finding people actually hate the show. I don&#8217;t mean in an American Idol type way, I mean as in I&#8217;ve defended it before and been treated as if I just said Hitler is a pretty cool guy. I mean that literally, you have no idea how hysterial people are in their hatred of Dollhouse. The fact it portrays an evil system dispassionately, and the people running it as human beings rather than evil archetypes, really rubs critics up the wrong way. I love the show for those strengths, but alas I think it&#8217;s too complex for general audiences to appreciate. Add to that the fact it&#8217;s already not attracted a large audience, and the issues others have raised about the &#8220;main character&#8221; not being identifiable, and you don&#8217;t have something that has a large pull.</p>
<p>DVD sales will be low partially for the above, and partially because the DVD set is relatively expensive for relatively little. $32 is the heavily discounted price. It&#8217;s not even on my wait order list, and I love the show.</p>
<p>2. Second most likely</p>
<p>Ratings remain low, but DVD sales are good. Fox finishes series 2 (including mid-season pick-up), with S3 onwards moved to FX</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already explained why I think ratings will remain low. There&#8217;s more of a chance I&#8217;m wrong on DVD sales, largely because the DVD set contains some extras many fans will feel are critical, in much the same way that fans of Firefly felt obliged to buy the DVD set because it had content missing from the network run.</p>
<p>Why finish the series and put S3 on FX? Well, if DVD sales are high, and ratings don&#8217;t go lower, then there may well be enough of an audience to justify showing the show on cable especially as the cost is low and the DVD sales will help drive up revenues. Dollhouse would also appear to fit some of FX&#8217;s demographic. Why bother canceling it if the show is ultimately profitable? It&#8217;s better to find a way to keep making the show, it&#8217;s just putting it on Fox with such low ratings makes no sense.</p>
<p>3. Third most likely</p>
<p>Ratings go up, DVD sales are high. Show continues to limp on, with a third season commissioned for the Fox Network.</p>
<p>I think both are improbable but if somehow ratings improve, I can see Fox renewing the series as they don&#8217;t have much of a justification for not doing so.</p>
<p>4. Fourth most likely: Ratings plummet. DVD sales low. Show is canceled after seven or eight episodes.</p>
<p>Highly improbable. I think Dollhouse has attracted a base of strong fans, so I don&#8217;t see Dollhouse dropping below the 1.0 it ended the first season on. But it&#8217;s also possible the second season will stink.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;m hoping for the second or third most likely scenarios. I just don&#8217;t see either as particularly likely. I don&#8217;t think ratings will go above a 1.2, and I don&#8217;t think DVD sales are going to be particularly good. But I&#8217;d be delighted to be proven wrong, as the show&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100724</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100724</guid>
		<description>And what do we Swedenborgians have to do with DOLLHOUSE? (Or comets,
for that matter?) I have no idea what you are trying to say.
  The plot of &quot;Stage Fright&quot; was stolen from Chesterton, but I
saw nothing about &quot;Swedenborgian space&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what do we Swedenborgians have to do with DOLLHOUSE? (Or comets,<br />
for that matter?) I have no idea what you are trying to say.<br />
  The plot of &#8220;Stage Fright&#8221; was stolen from Chesterton, but I<br />
saw nothing about &#8220;Swedenborgian space&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100303</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100303</guid>
		<description>Lanie Grace says:

&quot;Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.&quot;

Why?  You&#039;ve already cognized that it might fall to a 0.5, at which point &quot;Kevin Reilly&#039;s ego&quot; would take the reins in grand Swedenborgian fashion, like the comet Kohoutek.  This is &quot;the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.&quot;  So why now has that 0.5 turned into an expectantly engorged audience?  (Is this the &quot;different&quot; reason DH will &quot;at least go all of S2&quot; to go along with the &quot;same&quot; reason?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie Grace says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?  You&#8217;ve already cognized that it might fall to a 0.5, at which point &#8220;Kevin Reilly&#8217;s ego&#8221; would take the reins in grand Swedenborgian fashion, like the comet Kohoutek.  This is &#8220;the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.&#8221;  So why now has that 0.5 turned into an expectantly engorged audience?  (Is this the &#8220;different&#8221; reason DH will &#8220;at least go all of S2&#8243; to go along with the &#8220;same&#8221; reason?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100283</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100283</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think DVRs are sophisticated enough to measure this yet. but here&#039;s my belief: there isn&#039;t a single person in america who wants to watch the michael strahan sitcom, til death AND dollhouse.  my prediction is, exactly zero people in the united states will watch the entire fox friday night lineup on september 18.  DVRs can&#039;t tell us that yet, can they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think DVRs are sophisticated enough to measure this yet. but here&#8217;s my belief: there isn&#8217;t a single person in america who wants to watch the michael strahan sitcom, til death AND dollhouse.  my prediction is, exactly zero people in the united states will watch the entire fox friday night lineup on september 18.  DVRs can&#8217;t tell us that yet, can they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100269</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100269</guid>
		<description>High DVR numbers might be seen as evidence that a show is poorly scheduled. The issue, for Fox with Dollhouse, I guess is that they don&#039;t have another slot to show it in that isn&#039;t occupied with a show they believe has higher ratings than they believe Dollhouse is capable of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High DVR numbers might be seen as evidence that a show is poorly scheduled. The issue, for Fox with Dollhouse, I guess is that they don&#8217;t have another slot to show it in that isn&#8217;t occupied with a show they believe has higher ratings than they believe Dollhouse is capable of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greennogo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100248</link>
		<dc:creator>greennogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100248</guid>
		<description>I doubt that DVR and online stats are in a position to save anybody&#039;s show in and of themselves, but it&#039;s hard to argue that even with factoring in the technologically changeful nature of the 18-49 demo&#039;s viewing habits, that there are some definite inconsistencies between the terrestrial broadcast numbers and the new media viewing numbers.  An increase as radical as &quot;Dollhouse&#039;s&quot; is just too disproportionably large to ignore. I think even some advertisers realize this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that DVR and online stats are in a position to save anybody&#8217;s show in and of themselves, but it&#8217;s hard to argue that even with factoring in the technologically changeful nature of the 18-49 demo&#8217;s viewing habits, that there are some definite inconsistencies between the terrestrial broadcast numbers and the new media viewing numbers.  An increase as radical as &#8220;Dollhouse&#8217;s&#8221; is just too disproportionably large to ignore. I think even some advertisers realize this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100232</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100232</guid>
		<description>thanks bill, as long as people stay non-hateful i assume the endless debates are entertaining to anyone who peeks, but i&#039;ve never posted here before, so you never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks bill, as long as people stay non-hateful i assume the endless debates are entertaining to anyone who peeks, but i&#8217;ve never posted here before, so you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100226</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100226</guid>
		<description>freeman, all our comment threads are closed automatically after 14 days, you&#039;ve still got 8 days left!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freeman, all our comment threads are closed automatically after 14 days, you&#8217;ve still got 8 days left!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100223</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100223</guid>
		<description>i keep waiting for the tvbythenumbers people to shut this thread down and make us shut up.

but apparently we&#039;re still doing this.  and actually, there’s actually a fair amount of agreement between everyone still left.

I agree with the whedon fans in that:

fox doesn’t really believe in dollhouse.

i disagree with the whedon fans in that:

the reason fox doesn’t believe in dollhouse is because they shouldn’t.  it’s not a theoretical question any more, it’s been shown to the viewers and they’ve turned up their noses.  

the big over-arcing problem here is that in the 1990s, joss was willing to fully commit his talent to getting the viewers to identify with buffy and sarah michelle gellar and reap the rewards of the viewers’ love for buffy.  but joss’ ego has grown to the point where he now needs his writing to be the star of the show.  it needs to be Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse.  and in the immortal words of rocky the flying squirrel, that trick never works.  joss can get his not-big-enough-for-prime-time internet army to show up for that, but normal viewers only bond with people who are on the screen.

but hey, joss has some big hits under his belt and more money than he can ever spend. if he wants to cut back on the intensity and rigor of his work so he can enjoy it more, well, a lot of writers do that in their 40s, i’m certainly in no position to judge.

it’s only when he tries to use a fragile moment in a young actor’s career as a temporary flotation device to keep his drowning show afloat that he turns into something evil.  but i guess you could argue that it’s joss’ role to try that, and summer’s agent’s job to keep it from working.  so whatever, we’ll see what happens, it won’t be decided here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i keep waiting for the tvbythenumbers people to shut this thread down and make us shut up.</p>
<p>but apparently we&#8217;re still doing this.  and actually, there’s actually a fair amount of agreement between everyone still left.</p>
<p>I agree with the whedon fans in that:</p>
<p>fox doesn’t really believe in dollhouse.</p>
<p>i disagree with the whedon fans in that:</p>
<p>the reason fox doesn’t believe in dollhouse is because they shouldn’t.  it’s not a theoretical question any more, it’s been shown to the viewers and they’ve turned up their noses.  </p>
<p>the big over-arcing problem here is that in the 1990s, joss was willing to fully commit his talent to getting the viewers to identify with buffy and sarah michelle gellar and reap the rewards of the viewers’ love for buffy.  but joss’ ego has grown to the point where he now needs his writing to be the star of the show.  it needs to be Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse.  and in the immortal words of rocky the flying squirrel, that trick never works.  joss can get his not-big-enough-for-prime-time internet army to show up for that, but normal viewers only bond with people who are on the screen.</p>
<p>but hey, joss has some big hits under his belt and more money than he can ever spend. if he wants to cut back on the intensity and rigor of his work so he can enjoy it more, well, a lot of writers do that in their 40s, i’m certainly in no position to judge.</p>
<p>it’s only when he tries to use a fragile moment in a young actor’s career as a temporary flotation device to keep his drowning show afloat that he turns into something evil.  but i guess you could argue that it’s joss’ role to try that, and summer’s agent’s job to keep it from working.  so whatever, we’ll see what happens, it won’t be decided here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100189</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100189</guid>
		<description>@Richard Steven Hack

Thats a Dead On Comment, Summer&#039;s performance will determine her reputation, not if the show fails or succeeds.

@Max452

Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard Steven Hack</p>
<p>Thats a Dead On Comment, Summer&#8217;s performance will determine her reputation, not if the show fails or succeeds.</p>
<p>@Max452</p>
<p>Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max452</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100161</link>
		<dc:creator>max452</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100161</guid>
		<description>@Lanie,

If I remember correctly, the X-Files did so-so on Friday but became big when it was moved to Sundays. More people than the &quot;dedicated fan base&quot; started watching, and it became a hit. Fox even reran old episodes from seasons 1-4 on Sundays, which are some of the shows best. If X-files didn&#039;t do well on season 5 on Sundays it was done. There are interviews with Chris Carter saying they were trying to wrap some threads up in case they didn&#039;t make it to season 6.

If all Dollhouse has is its &quot;dedicated fanbase&quot; and doesn&#039;t attract new viewers, its done. When it comes to Fox, fan bases alone did not save Firefly, TSSC, Dark Angel, Briscoe County Jr, etc, etc, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lanie,</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, the X-Files did so-so on Friday but became big when it was moved to Sundays. More people than the &#8220;dedicated fan base&#8221; started watching, and it became a hit. Fox even reran old episodes from seasons 1-4 on Sundays, which are some of the shows best. If X-files didn&#8217;t do well on season 5 on Sundays it was done. There are interviews with Chris Carter saying they were trying to wrap some threads up in case they didn&#8217;t make it to season 6.</p>
<p>If all Dollhouse has is its &#8220;dedicated fanbase&#8221; and doesn&#8217;t attract new viewers, its done. When it comes to Fox, fan bases alone did not save Firefly, TSSC, Dark Angel, Briscoe County Jr, etc, etc, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100108</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100108</guid>
		<description>Freeman, as for Joss Whedon&#039;s career, it&#039;s like winning coaches with Baseball or Football.  People remember that they won it all in Year X, and they give them a chance well past their prime.  Joe Gibbs, numerous managers and General Managers in baseball come to mind.  Once you have a hit that you&#039;re responsible for, you always get a second chance.

Movies are another matter.  Anyone heard of Renny Harlin lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeman, as for Joss Whedon&#8217;s career, it&#8217;s like winning coaches with Baseball or Football.  People remember that they won it all in Year X, and they give them a chance well past their prime.  Joe Gibbs, numerous managers and General Managers in baseball come to mind.  Once you have a hit that you&#8217;re responsible for, you always get a second chance.</p>
<p>Movies are another matter.  Anyone heard of Renny Harlin lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100087</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100087</guid>
		<description>Freeman: Nothing is going to damage Summer&#039;s rep except a bad performance - which I&#039;ve never seen her give, not recently anyway.

What would be likely to happen is that Summer is brought in to boost the ratings, they don&#039;t boost, they go down, and everybody says what a shame it was that Summer was on another failing show.

Just like they did with TSCC after Firefly. That&#039;s exactly what they said. As long as most people perceive her character as engaging and her performance professional, she&#039;s not going to have a problem with the show failing out from under her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeman: Nothing is going to damage Summer&#8217;s rep except a bad performance &#8211; which I&#8217;ve never seen her give, not recently anyway.</p>
<p>What would be likely to happen is that Summer is brought in to boost the ratings, they don&#8217;t boost, they go down, and everybody says what a shame it was that Summer was on another failing show.</p>
<p>Just like they did with TSCC after Firefly. That&#8217;s exactly what they said. As long as most people perceive her character as engaging and her performance professional, she&#8217;s not going to have a problem with the show failing out from under her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-100067</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100067</guid>
		<description>@The_GodfatherSJP

If Fridays are so bad what was the reason behind the X-Files massive success? Wasn&#039;t the first four seasons of X-Files on Friday at 9pm?

If the answer is X-Files had solid writing, a dedicated fan base and all around good show that overcame the &quot;Friday Death Slot&quot; then why didn&#039;t the robot show make it?

I am betting that Dollhouse will over come the Friday Death Slot and will not need a lead, hence it will be able to stand on its own, again, unlike the robot show and before anyone gets all in a tizzy, if the robot show could stand on it&#039;s own, it would still be there.

But anyway GF,

Thank you for explaining,

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The_GodfatherSJP</p>
<p>If Fridays are so bad what was the reason behind the X-Files massive success? Wasn&#8217;t the first four seasons of X-Files on Friday at 9pm?</p>
<p>If the answer is X-Files had solid writing, a dedicated fan base and all around good show that overcame the &#8220;Friday Death Slot&#8221; then why didn&#8217;t the robot show make it?</p>
<p>I am betting that Dollhouse will over come the Friday Death Slot and will not need a lead, hence it will be able to stand on its own, again, unlike the robot show and before anyone gets all in a tizzy, if the robot show could stand on it&#8217;s own, it would still be there.</p>
<p>But anyway GF,</p>
<p>Thank you for explaining,</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99892</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99892</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, mistake on my part.  Brothers is at 8PM.  Even worse than Sons of Tucson.  A Michael Strahan comedy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, mistake on my part.  Brothers is at 8PM.  Even worse than Sons of Tucson.  A Michael Strahan comedy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99889</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99889</guid>
		<description>Okay, my 2 cents over Dollhouse&#039;s renewal is this:

Forget fan demand.  Forget DVR numbers.  Forget ratings, or at least in the traditional sense.

It&#039;s M O N E Y.  Personally, I very much buy Nick C.&#039;s story that Dollhouse could be produced very cheaply, that&#039;s the pitch that sold the show for a second season.  Think about it.  They get an hour&#039;s worth of television for the price of a half hour sitcom, and its a sci-fi drama that they wholly own and produce.  So they see all the money from DVD sales and syndication, and it&#039;s a Whedon project, guaranteed fanbase.  Plus they get all the advertising revenue.  Win win for the network, it&#039;s a guaranteed money maker.  Of course, if the ratings really tank, that&#039;s another story.

Even then, they&#039;re not overly enthusiastic about the show&#039;s chances.  If they were, why keep it on a Friday, where television shows go to die?  Why lead off with a Freshman comedy, Sons of Tucson, followed by a failing sitcom, Til Death, which was only renewed because of Sony&#039;s cheap deal with FOX?  Dollhouse&#039;s ratings tanked badly with a non sci-fi lead in, do they really expect much better with two shows that have very little audience overlap with Sci-Fi viewers?  If they were optimistic about it&#039;s chances, it would have been paired with Past Life or Human Target.  

It&#039;s not.  It got renewed because it was very cheap, FOX will give it another chance to improve, but they&#039;re not expecting much.  Show&#039;s going in to the Fall 2009 season already on life support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, my 2 cents over Dollhouse&#8217;s renewal is this:</p>
<p>Forget fan demand.  Forget DVR numbers.  Forget ratings, or at least in the traditional sense.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s M O N E Y.  Personally, I very much buy Nick C.&#8217;s story that Dollhouse could be produced very cheaply, that&#8217;s the pitch that sold the show for a second season.  Think about it.  They get an hour&#8217;s worth of television for the price of a half hour sitcom, and its a sci-fi drama that they wholly own and produce.  So they see all the money from DVD sales and syndication, and it&#8217;s a Whedon project, guaranteed fanbase.  Plus they get all the advertising revenue.  Win win for the network, it&#8217;s a guaranteed money maker.  Of course, if the ratings really tank, that&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>Even then, they&#8217;re not overly enthusiastic about the show&#8217;s chances.  If they were, why keep it on a Friday, where television shows go to die?  Why lead off with a Freshman comedy, Sons of Tucson, followed by a failing sitcom, Til Death, which was only renewed because of Sony&#8217;s cheap deal with FOX?  Dollhouse&#8217;s ratings tanked badly with a non sci-fi lead in, do they really expect much better with two shows that have very little audience overlap with Sci-Fi viewers?  If they were optimistic about it&#8217;s chances, it would have been paired with Past Life or Human Target.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not.  It got renewed because it was very cheap, FOX will give it another chance to improve, but they&#8217;re not expecting much.  Show&#8217;s going in to the Fall 2009 season already on life support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karolina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99875</link>
		<dc:creator>karolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99875</guid>
		<description>I came up with a second Michael Strahan/Dollhouse crossover episode.

Michael&#039;s boss invites him to play golf.  But Michael doesn&#039;t play golf.  So he goes to the Dollhouse and gets imprinted with Tiger Woods&#039; golf-playing abilities.  But the boss hates playing against a great golfer.  Michael learns to be himself.  It&#039;s more of an emotional episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came up with a second Michael Strahan/Dollhouse crossover episode.</p>
<p>Michael&#8217;s boss invites him to play golf.  But Michael doesn&#8217;t play golf.  So he goes to the Dollhouse and gets imprinted with Tiger Woods&#8217; golf-playing abilities.  But the boss hates playing against a great golfer.  Michael learns to be himself.  It&#8217;s more of an emotional episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99864</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99864</guid>
		<description>of course, if kevin reilly was REALLY committed to dollhouse he might have given it a better time slot or a real budget or a real lead-in.  he might have given it sample screenings on better nights to expose viewers to the show - networks do that with shows they really believe in, you know.

i&#039;m not sure you&#039;ll find a lot of precedent for kevin giving a THIRD season to shows without viewers.  the shows he&#039;s famous for nurturing, 30 rock, the office and the sopranos, outgrew their awkward phases and built decent audiences.  when sarah connor did a second season with dollhouse-like numbers, kevin pulled the plug.

will the second season be 13 or 22?  like boris says, we can just wait to find out.  it&#039;s not up to me.  and it will have more to do with when fox has its new friday night ready than dollhouse itself.

by the way, if you&#039;re such a joss whedon fan you shouldn&#039;t really celebrate these pathetic charity pickups.  the whole time dollhouse is scraping along at the bottom of the ratings it&#039;s quietly eroding joss whedon&#039;s ability to get future movies and tv shows made.  if you recall, in the 1990s he did stuff that was interesting AND successful.  now he hasn&#039;t had a hit in ten years.  at some point they start to notice stuff like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course, if kevin reilly was REALLY committed to dollhouse he might have given it a better time slot or a real budget or a real lead-in.  he might have given it sample screenings on better nights to expose viewers to the show &#8211; networks do that with shows they really believe in, you know.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;ll find a lot of precedent for kevin giving a THIRD season to shows without viewers.  the shows he&#8217;s famous for nurturing, 30 rock, the office and the sopranos, outgrew their awkward phases and built decent audiences.  when sarah connor did a second season with dollhouse-like numbers, kevin pulled the plug.</p>
<p>will the second season be 13 or 22?  like boris says, we can just wait to find out.  it&#8217;s not up to me.  and it will have more to do with when fox has its new friday night ready than dollhouse itself.</p>
<p>by the way, if you&#8217;re such a joss whedon fan you shouldn&#8217;t really celebrate these pathetic charity pickups.  the whole time dollhouse is scraping along at the bottom of the ratings it&#8217;s quietly eroding joss whedon&#8217;s ability to get future movies and tv shows made.  if you recall, in the 1990s he did stuff that was interesting AND successful.  now he hasn&#8217;t had a hit in ten years.  at some point they start to notice stuff like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99827</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99827</guid>
		<description>Lanie Grace says:

&quot;DH will run for a 22 episode Season 2, you can count on it.&quot;

~ Isn&#039;t this what wagering is for? ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie Grace says:</p>
<p>&#8220;DH will run for a 22 episode Season 2, you can count on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>~ Isn&#8217;t this what wagering is for? ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99812</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99812</guid>
		<description>@Freeman

Dollhouse won&#039;t get canceled in mid season 2 if even it had a 0.5 rating!

Kevin Reilly&#039;s rep is on the line and his ego would never allow it! That&#039;s the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.

DH will run for a 22 episode Season 2, you can count on it.

Besides, I really think JW will adapt and the ratings will be better than S1.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Freeman</p>
<p>Dollhouse won&#8217;t get canceled in mid season 2 if even it had a 0.5 rating!</p>
<p>Kevin Reilly&#8217;s rep is on the line and his ego would never allow it! That&#8217;s the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.</p>
<p>DH will run for a 22 episode Season 2, you can count on it.</p>
<p>Besides, I really think JW will adapt and the ratings will be better than S1.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-4/#comment-99714</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99714</guid>
		<description>what the network will remember is, they brought in summer to make dollhouse a hit, and instead, dollhouse&#039;s ratings declined and the show got cancelled in mid-season.  and summer will have wasted her moment where she has the clout to get a show built around her.  she won&#039;t get tossed on the scrap heap like eliza, but she&#039;ll be damaged.

it&#039;s a sucker move, summer might want to do it out of loyalty, but it&#039;s her agent&#039;s job to keep desperate producers from glomming onto her like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the network will remember is, they brought in summer to make dollhouse a hit, and instead, dollhouse&#8217;s ratings declined and the show got cancelled in mid-season.  and summer will have wasted her moment where she has the clout to get a show built around her.  she won&#8217;t get tossed on the scrap heap like eliza, but she&#8217;ll be damaged.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s a sucker move, summer might want to do it out of loyalty, but it&#8217;s her agent&#8217;s job to keep desperate producers from glomming onto her like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99698</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99698</guid>
		<description>Richard Steven Hack says:

&quot;Summer won’t be RESPONSIBLE for the ratings whether she’s a regular or a recurring character. However, she will undoubtedly HELP the ratings, meaning either the ratings will go up or they’ll go down slower than they would otherwise.&quot;

So, she would have an indisputable effect that is nonetheless beyond any possibility of quantification?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Steven Hack says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Summer won’t be RESPONSIBLE for the ratings whether she’s a regular or a recurring character. However, she will undoubtedly HELP the ratings, meaning either the ratings will go up or they’ll go down slower than they would otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, she would have an indisputable effect that is nonetheless beyond any possibility of quantification?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99681</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99681</guid>
		<description>if you don&#039;t think networks judge actors by the ratings of the shows they star in, wait and see how many networks offer eliza dushku development deals after tru calling and dollhouse.

if summer waits six months, takes an interesting movie part or two, someone hot like j.j. abrams might develop something just for her this winter or put her on the crew of the enterprise or something.  that&#039;s the way to play it if you&#039;re summer&#039;s agent, you don&#039;t go down with dollhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you don&#8217;t think networks judge actors by the ratings of the shows they star in, wait and see how many networks offer eliza dushku development deals after tru calling and dollhouse.</p>
<p>if summer waits six months, takes an interesting movie part or two, someone hot like j.j. abrams might develop something just for her this winter or put her on the crew of the enterprise or something.  that&#8217;s the way to play it if you&#8217;re summer&#8217;s agent, you don&#8217;t go down with dollhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99633</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99633</guid>
		<description>Comment 32 was supposed to mean single camera comedies, which I believe they are. I always get those terms confused (even though I know when I sit back and think of it logically. Single camera = not &quot;recorded live&quot; &#039;cos you have to keep moving the camera, but it sounds less expensive than two camera which is why I keep writing the wrong thing. Just ignore me.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment 32 was supposed to mean single camera comedies, which I believe they are. I always get those terms confused (even though I know when I sit back and think of it logically. Single camera = not &#8220;recorded live&#8221; &#8216;cos you have to keep moving the camera, but it sounds less expensive than two camera which is why I keep writing the wrong thing. Just ignore me.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karolina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99619</link>
		<dc:creator>karolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99619</guid>
		<description>They can do cross-over episodes to tie the night together.

Like this.  Michael Strahan has a headache and he takes a handful of what he thinks is aspirin but turns out to be Viagra.  So he has to go to the Dollhouse and rent out Sierra for the weekend.  But they mess up and give her a nasty personality like Doris Roberts on Everybody Loves Raymond.  Michael has to take a long cold shower.

There are lots of stories like this, they can do this one if they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can do cross-over episodes to tie the night together.</p>
<p>Like this.  Michael Strahan has a headache and he takes a handful of what he thinks is aspirin but turns out to be Viagra.  So he has to go to the Dollhouse and rent out Sierra for the weekend.  But they mess up and give her a nasty personality like Doris Roberts on Everybody Loves Raymond.  Michael has to take a long cold shower.</p>
<p>There are lots of stories like this, they can do this one if they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entertainment Link-Off: Good Girls Go Bad! &#171; The Lowdown Blog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99604</link>
		<dc:creator>Entertainment Link-Off: Good Girls Go Bad! &#171; The Lowdown Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99604</guid>
		<description>[...] seems like the DVR may have saved Dollhouse from cancellation! (TV by the Numbers) Nah, it&#8217;s more likely because the show was able to trim its budget and that FOX was afraid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems like the DVR may have saved Dollhouse from cancellation! (TV by the Numbers) Nah, it&#8217;s more likely because the show was able to trim its budget and that FOX was afraid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99542</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99542</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Michael Strahan, I&#039;m taking a poll. Which is the bigger gaping hole? The one in his front teeth or the one in FOX&#039;s Friday night lineup? 

(P.S. If you thought that joke was bad, my advice is don&#039;t watch &quot;Brothers&quot; this fall. Because that&#039;s pretty much most of the jokes that were in the pilot.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Michael Strahan, I&#8217;m taking a poll. Which is the bigger gaping hole? The one in his front teeth or the one in FOX&#8217;s Friday night lineup? </p>
<p>(P.S. If you thought that joke was bad, my advice is don&#8217;t watch &#8220;Brothers&#8221; this fall. Because that&#8217;s pretty much most of the jokes that were in the pilot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99523</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99523</guid>
		<description>Summer won&#039;t be RESPONSIBLE for the ratings whether she&#039;s a regular or a recurring character. However, she will undoubtedly HELP the ratings, meaning either the ratings will go up or they&#039;ll go down slower than they would otherwise.

In the end, a show&#039;s ratings depend on the story and the execution, not any given character.

But Joss would be insane not to get her on the show if he can without hurting the STORY. And, yes, there are probably other actors you could say the same about, but Summer is a known quantity to him, just like Eliza is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer won&#8217;t be RESPONSIBLE for the ratings whether she&#8217;s a regular or a recurring character. However, she will undoubtedly HELP the ratings, meaning either the ratings will go up or they&#8217;ll go down slower than they would otherwise.</p>
<p>In the end, a show&#8217;s ratings depend on the story and the execution, not any given character.</p>
<p>But Joss would be insane not to get her on the show if he can without hurting the STORY. And, yes, there are probably other actors you could say the same about, but Summer is a known quantity to him, just like Eliza is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Strahan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99518</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Strahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99518</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse is going to taste paydirt this fall!  We are going to the post season!

Everyone I know tells me: a perverted whiteboy asking what is identity?  I&#039;m all over that shit!

Dollhouse and Michael Strahan!  All the way, baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse is going to taste paydirt this fall!  We are going to the post season!</p>
<p>Everyone I know tells me: a perverted whiteboy asking what is identity?  I&#8217;m all over that shit!</p>
<p>Dollhouse and Michael Strahan!  All the way, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: personalitynumber23</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99515</link>
		<dc:creator>personalitynumber23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99515</guid>
		<description>She&#039;d be insane to do more than a couple of appearances.  The ratings won&#039;t be her fault if she just does a two- or three-shot recurring character.

Maybe if Joss adds Howie Long and Terry Bradshaw as Dolls, the Michael Strahan audience will grit their teeth and stick it out through Til Death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;d be insane to do more than a couple of appearances.  The ratings won&#8217;t be her fault if she just does a two- or three-shot recurring character.</p>
<p>Maybe if Joss adds Howie Long and Terry Bradshaw as Dolls, the Michael Strahan audience will grit their teeth and stick it out through Til Death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99511</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99511</guid>
		<description>Freeman, you might have a point, but I&#039;m not sure Summer really cares. She likes Joss and I think she&#039;d work for him on pretty much anything regardless of it&#039;s potential of being canceled. Her agent might not like it, but I think she wouldn&#039;t really care that much. I think she views her career at this point as still &quot;new&quot; and is willing to do pretty much anything that comes her way that doesn&#039;t offend her.

She apparently passed on a movie recently because it involved some risque scenes involving kissing another actress. But I doubt she&#039;d pass on any Joss production unless she really didn&#039;t like the role.

As for the Joss quote above, he said nothing about Summer NOT being on Dollhouse. He just re-iterated that he wouldn&#039;t do it unless he could craft a useful role for her. But it&#039;s quite obvious that her presence on the show would lift ratings somewhat, so I&#039;m sure he&#039;s thinking about it. We don&#039;t know yet what direction the show is going to take in season two, and I think he&#039;s more concerned about that right now than adding Summer. Once he figures that out, he may well see a place for her, at least as an occasional guest star.

As for whether there would be a &quot;feud&quot; between Summer and Eliza, Nick C said a while back that he didn&#039;t believe that, since Eliza would be cool about Summer being on as long as it helped her show. However, as Lanie suggests, they could always create such a feud just for PR reasons. That probably isn&#039;t a good idea, in my opinion, since such things can damage someone&#039;s public perception. However, as the Church of the SubGenius always says, &quot;There&#039;s no such thing as no PR!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeman, you might have a point, but I&#8217;m not sure Summer really cares. She likes Joss and I think she&#8217;d work for him on pretty much anything regardless of it&#8217;s potential of being canceled. Her agent might not like it, but I think she wouldn&#8217;t really care that much. I think she views her career at this point as still &#8220;new&#8221; and is willing to do pretty much anything that comes her way that doesn&#8217;t offend her.</p>
<p>She apparently passed on a movie recently because it involved some risque scenes involving kissing another actress. But I doubt she&#8217;d pass on any Joss production unless she really didn&#8217;t like the role.</p>
<p>As for the Joss quote above, he said nothing about Summer NOT being on Dollhouse. He just re-iterated that he wouldn&#8217;t do it unless he could craft a useful role for her. But it&#8217;s quite obvious that her presence on the show would lift ratings somewhat, so I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s thinking about it. We don&#8217;t know yet what direction the show is going to take in season two, and I think he&#8217;s more concerned about that right now than adding Summer. Once he figures that out, he may well see a place for her, at least as an occasional guest star.</p>
<p>As for whether there would be a &#8220;feud&#8221; between Summer and Eliza, Nick C said a while back that he didn&#8217;t believe that, since Eliza would be cool about Summer being on as long as it helped her show. However, as Lanie suggests, they could always create such a feud just for PR reasons. That probably isn&#8217;t a good idea, in my opinion, since such things can damage someone&#8217;s public perception. However, as the Church of the SubGenius always says, &#8220;There&#8217;s no such thing as no PR!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99494</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99494</guid>
		<description>maybe or maybe not.  but here&#039;s the question you REALLY can&#039;t answer.

i understand why you might want to see it and why joss whedon might want it.  but why would summer do it?  at this point she wants something developed for her, where SHE will be the star, something that has a chance to find an audience.  why buy a ticket on a death ship like dollhouse?  we know and she knows that dollhouse doesn&#039;t do numbers.  who wants to be cancelled twice in six months? that&#039;s serious career damage.

and even if somehow summer lifted dollhouse on her shoulders and made it a hit, she&#039;d be the person powering a hit show, but the star and executive producer would be Her Majesty The Straight-To-Video Queen Eliza I.  summer&#039;s career trajectory is up, eliza&#039;s is down.  summer&#039;s agent would never let her be a second banana to eliza at this point in time.  it should be the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe or maybe not.  but here&#8217;s the question you REALLY can&#8217;t answer.</p>
<p>i understand why you might want to see it and why joss whedon might want it.  but why would summer do it?  at this point she wants something developed for her, where SHE will be the star, something that has a chance to find an audience.  why buy a ticket on a death ship like dollhouse?  we know and she knows that dollhouse doesn&#8217;t do numbers.  who wants to be cancelled twice in six months? that&#8217;s serious career damage.</p>
<p>and even if somehow summer lifted dollhouse on her shoulders and made it a hit, she&#8217;d be the person powering a hit show, but the star and executive producer would be Her Majesty The Straight-To-Video Queen Eliza I.  summer&#8217;s career trajectory is up, eliza&#8217;s is down.  summer&#8217;s agent would never let her be a second banana to eliza at this point in time.  it should be the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99474</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99474</guid>
		<description>Simple answer:

Because Joss Wheddon will not relegate her to a background object with more lines in the promtionals than in the actual script. That&#039;s why.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple answer:</p>
<p>Because Joss Wheddon will not relegate her to a background object with more lines in the promtionals than in the actual script. That&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99472</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99472</guid>
		<description>ummm, hang on here.

if summer glau is such a ratings powerhouse, if she&#039;s gonna save dollhouse, how come nobody watched sarah connor?  sarah connor was an okay show and its ratings stunk just as bad as dollhouse&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm, hang on here.</p>
<p>if summer glau is such a ratings powerhouse, if she&#8217;s gonna save dollhouse, how come nobody watched sarah connor?  sarah connor was an okay show and its ratings stunk just as bad as dollhouse&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99425</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99425</guid>
		<description>@Gusar
I think most people who read this understood what I meant &quot;The onscreen appeareance of two very popular female actresses&quot; when referring to &quot;Alpha Doll&quot; and futhermore; concerning TSCC, noone cares about TSCC anymore including cast, production crew, and WB. It&#039;s dead and gone.

The infamous Terminator Wiki doesn&#039;t even seem to really show any interest in the &quot;resurrection&quot; anylonger...very few people even mention it anymore on the site. The whole board has devovlved into a fanatical Summer Glau worship site of the ilk that most celebrities steer far and wide from. You know, the freaks!

Dollhouse is going to have a great success this Season 2 and I am confident there will be a Season 3. It will out perform TSCC in ratings, revenue and viewership which is why it was renewed.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gusar<br />
I think most people who read this understood what I meant &#8220;The onscreen appeareance of two very popular female actresses&#8221; when referring to &#8220;Alpha Doll&#8221; and futhermore; concerning TSCC, noone cares about TSCC anymore including cast, production crew, and WB. It&#8217;s dead and gone.</p>
<p>The infamous Terminator Wiki doesn&#8217;t even seem to really show any interest in the &#8220;resurrection&#8221; anylonger&#8230;very few people even mention it anymore on the site. The whole board has devovlved into a fanatical Summer Glau worship site of the ilk that most celebrities steer far and wide from. You know, the freaks!</p>
<p>Dollhouse is going to have a great success this Season 2 and I am confident there will be a Season 3. It will out perform TSCC in ratings, revenue and viewership which is why it was renewed.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99413</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99413</guid>
		<description>Lanie, in other words, you&#039;ll create an artificial feud because you&#039;ve figured out a lot of TSCC fans fall for your crap.

Won&#039;t work though, a lot of TSCC fans absolutely *hate* Dollhouse and bash it in any way they can. Hell, they bash _me_ at the wiki because I dare to like Dollhouse. Or are you saying other fandoms also fall for your crap? Well, even if that&#039;s the case, this won&#039;t work for another reason: Even if Summer will appear on the show (not a given at all, read the ling squiggleslash provided), she will NOT play a doll. The least you could do is read Joss&#039; words on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie, in other words, you&#8217;ll create an artificial feud because you&#8217;ve figured out a lot of TSCC fans fall for your crap.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t work though, a lot of TSCC fans absolutely *hate* Dollhouse and bash it in any way they can. Hell, they bash _me_ at the wiki because I dare to like Dollhouse. Or are you saying other fandoms also fall for your crap? Well, even if that&#8217;s the case, this won&#8217;t work for another reason: Even if Summer will appear on the show (not a given at all, read the ling squiggleslash provided), she will NOT play a doll. The least you could do is read Joss&#8217; words on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99412</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99412</guid>
		<description>Tom, sorry I unintentionally I deleted your posts requesting more data including ALL broadcast and cable shows.   

But, to answer your question, yes, it is too greedy!   Nielsen doesn&#039;t want this data published regularly, and certainly not in the bulk/detail  you are asking for.  And all DVR info, including all broadcast and cable shows and also 18-49 increases...I don&#039;t blame Nielsen for not allowing that to be published freely.  

BTW,  I&#039;m not sure we&#039;ll be able to publish ANY regular &quot;top&quot; lists of DVR data when the fall comes, but will be happy if we can even post even the top 20 regularly.  I know that won&#039;t satisfy the folks like you who are extremely curious.  If it makes you feel any better, we didn&#039;t see the cable data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, sorry I unintentionally I deleted your posts requesting more data including ALL broadcast and cable shows.   </p>
<p>But, to answer your question, yes, it is too greedy!   Nielsen doesn&#8217;t want this data published regularly, and certainly not in the bulk/detail  you are asking for.  And all DVR info, including all broadcast and cable shows and also 18-49 increases&#8230;I don&#8217;t blame Nielsen for not allowing that to be published freely.  </p>
<p>BTW,  I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;ll be able to publish ANY regular &#8220;top&#8221; lists of DVR data when the fall comes, but will be happy if we can even post even the top 20 regularly.  I know that won&#8217;t satisfy the folks like you who are extremely curious.  If it makes you feel any better, we didn&#8217;t see the cable data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99375</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99375</guid>
		<description>Lanie Grace says:

&quot;Summer Glau will apear at some point in Season 2 of Dollhouse. It will boost the ratings huge and will be followed by a &#039;Fan Fueled Fued&#039; real or inagined, between Summer Glau and Eliza Dushku over who is the &#039;Alpha Doll&#039;&quot;

It would be more kewl if they could separate the audience into putative FOREX traders and those who invest in rare pennies, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie Grace says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Summer Glau will apear at some point in Season 2 of Dollhouse. It will boost the ratings huge and will be followed by a &#8216;Fan Fueled Fued&#8217; real or inagined, between Summer Glau and Eliza Dushku over who is the &#8216;Alpha Doll&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be more kewl if they could separate the audience into putative FOREX traders and those who invest in rare pennies, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99374</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99374</guid>
		<description>WOW, we need an edit function! I guess I shouldn&#039;t walk and &quot;Blackberry&quot; at the same time ha? Sorry for the mizspellin&#039;

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, we need an edit function! I guess I shouldn&#8217;t walk and &#8220;Blackberry&#8221; at the same time ha? Sorry for the mizspellin&#8217;</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99372</guid>
		<description>TomSD, here you go, bad formatting and all.

Top 20 Viewers Live+7
Rank	Programs	Net	 Persons Live (000s) 	 Persons Live+SD (000s) 	 Persons Live+7 (000s) 	 Same Day DVR Viewers (000s) 	 Total DVR Viewers (000s) 	 % of All Viewing By DVR 	% of DVR Viewing On Airdate
1	AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY	FOX	 22,432 	 25,532 	 26,878 	 3,100 	 4,446 	16.5%	69.7%
2	AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY	FOX	 21,368 	 24,743 	 26,308 	 3,375 	 4,940 	18.8%	68.3%
3	DANCING WITH THE STARS	ABC	 18,601 	 19,767 	 20,402 	 1,166 	 1,801 	8.8%	64.7%
4	CSI	CBS	 16,501 	 17,432 	 19,151 	 931 	 2,650 	13.8%	35.1%
5	NCIS	CBS	 15,729 	 16,804 	 17,989 	 1,075 	 2,260 	12.6%	47.6%
6	MENTALIST, THE	CBS	 15,413 	 16,290 	 17,668 	 877 	 2,255 	12.8%	38.9%
7	DANCING W/STARS RESULTS	ABC	 15,481 	 16,315 	 16,880 	 834 	 1,399 	8.3%	59.6%
8	NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL	NBC	 16,001 	 16,248 	 16,271 	 247 	 270 	1.7%	91.5%
9	DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES	ABC	 12,944 	 14,441 	 15,869 	 1,497 	 2,925 	18.4%	51.2%
10	TWO AND A HALF MEN	CBS	 13,218 	 14,113 	 15,095 	 895 	 1,877 	12.4%	47.7%
11	CRIMINAL MINDS	CBS	 12,873 	 13,715 	 15,067 	 842 	 2,194 	14.6%	38.4%
12	GREY&#039;S ANATOMY-THU 9PM	ABC	 11,500 	 12,891 	 14,785 	 1,391 	 3,285 	22.2%	42.3%
13	CSI: MIAMI	CBS	 12,729 	 13,173 	 14,304 	 444 	 1,575 	11.0%	28.2%
14	60 MINUTES	CBS	 13,671 	 14,143 	 14,292 	 472 	 621 	4.3%	76.0%
15	SURVIVOR: GABON	CBS	 11,416 	 12,914 	 13,810 	 1,498 	 2,394 	17.3%	62.6%
16	HOUSE	FOX	 10,306 	 11,906 	 13,622 	 1,600 	 3,316 	24.3%	48.3%
17	CSI: NY	CBS	 12,163 	 12,529 	 13,500 	 366 	 1,337 	9.9%	27.4%
18	WITHOUT A TRACE	CBS	 11,756 	 12,049 	 13,023 	 293 	 1,267 	9.7%	23.1%
19	SURVIVOR: TOCANTINS	CBS	 10,408 	 12,105 	 12,997 	 1,697 	 2,589 	19.9%	65.5%
20	24	FOX	 9,557 	 11,182 	 12,741 	 1,625 	 3,184 	25.0%	51.0%

Top 20 Adults 18-49 ratings Live +7
Rank	Programs	Net	18-49 Live (rating)	18-49 Live+SD (rating)	18-49 Live+7 (rating)	Increase From DVR Viewing	% of All Viewing By DVR	% of DVR Viewing On Airdate
1	AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY	FOX	7.75	9.24	9.85	27%	21%	71%
2	AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY	FOX	7.49	9.13	9.84	31%	24%	70%
3	NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL	NBC	6.02	6.15	6.16	2%	2%	93%
4	DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES	ABC	4.38	5.15	5.84	33%	25%	53%
5	GREY&#039;S ANATOMY-THU 9PM	ABC	4.01	4.76	5.72	43%	30%	44%
6	HOUSE	FOX	3.82	4.62	5.45	43%	30%	49%
7	CSI	CBS	4.15	4.55	5.30	28%	22%	35%
8	LOST	ABC	3.33	4.24	5.17	55%	36%	49%
9	TWO AND A HALF MEN	CBS	4.30	4.71	5.12	19%	16%	50%
10	DANCING WITH THE STARS	ABC	4.19	4.65	4.89	17%	14%	66%
11	OFFICE	NBC	3.10	4.01	4.86	57%	36%	52%
12	SURVIVOR: GABON	CBS	3.49	4.20	4.64	33%	25%	62%
13	OT, THE	FOX	4.37	4.45	4.45	2%	2%	100%
14	HEROES	NBC	2.90	3.58	4.44	53%	35%	44%
15	24	FOX	2.92	3.65	4.33	48%	33%	52%
16	SURVIVOR: TOCANTINS	CBS	3.06	3.84	4.30	41%	29%	63%
17	RULES OF ENGAGEMENT	CBS	3.57	3.91	4.23	18%	16%	52%
18	BACHELOR, THE	ABC	3.52	3.97	4.19	19%	16%	67%
19	FRINGE	FOX	3.09	3.54	4.17	35%	26%	42%
20	BIGGEST LOSER 7	NBC	3.30	3.80	4.15	26%	20%	59%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TomSD, here you go, bad formatting and all.</p>
<p>Top 20 Viewers Live+7<br />
Rank	Programs	Net	 Persons Live (000s) 	 Persons Live+SD (000s) 	 Persons Live+7 (000s) 	 Same Day DVR Viewers (000s) 	 Total DVR Viewers (000s) 	 % of All Viewing By DVR 	% of DVR Viewing On Airdate<br />
1	AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY	FOX	 22,432 	 25,532 	 26,878 	 3,100 	 4,446 	16.5%	69.7%<br />
2	AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY	FOX	 21,368 	 24,743 	 26,308 	 3,375 	 4,940 	18.8%	68.3%<br />
3	DANCING WITH THE STARS	ABC	 18,601 	 19,767 	 20,402 	 1,166 	 1,801 	8.8%	64.7%<br />
4	CSI	CBS	 16,501 	 17,432 	 19,151 	 931 	 2,650 	13.8%	35.1%<br />
5	NCIS	CBS	 15,729 	 16,804 	 17,989 	 1,075 	 2,260 	12.6%	47.6%<br />
6	MENTALIST, THE	CBS	 15,413 	 16,290 	 17,668 	 877 	 2,255 	12.8%	38.9%<br />
7	DANCING W/STARS RESULTS	ABC	 15,481 	 16,315 	 16,880 	 834 	 1,399 	8.3%	59.6%<br />
8	NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL	NBC	 16,001 	 16,248 	 16,271 	 247 	 270 	1.7%	91.5%<br />
9	DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES	ABC	 12,944 	 14,441 	 15,869 	 1,497 	 2,925 	18.4%	51.2%<br />
10	TWO AND A HALF MEN	CBS	 13,218 	 14,113 	 15,095 	 895 	 1,877 	12.4%	47.7%<br />
11	CRIMINAL MINDS	CBS	 12,873 	 13,715 	 15,067 	 842 	 2,194 	14.6%	38.4%<br />
12	GREY&#8217;S ANATOMY-THU 9PM	ABC	 11,500 	 12,891 	 14,785 	 1,391 	 3,285 	22.2%	42.3%<br />
13	CSI: MIAMI	CBS	 12,729 	 13,173 	 14,304 	 444 	 1,575 	11.0%	28.2%<br />
14	60 MINUTES	CBS	 13,671 	 14,143 	 14,292 	 472 	 621 	4.3%	76.0%<br />
15	SURVIVOR: GABON	CBS	 11,416 	 12,914 	 13,810 	 1,498 	 2,394 	17.3%	62.6%<br />
16	HOUSE	FOX	 10,306 	 11,906 	 13,622 	 1,600 	 3,316 	24.3%	48.3%<br />
17	CSI: NY	CBS	 12,163 	 12,529 	 13,500 	 366 	 1,337 	9.9%	27.4%<br />
18	WITHOUT A TRACE	CBS	 11,756 	 12,049 	 13,023 	 293 	 1,267 	9.7%	23.1%<br />
19	SURVIVOR: TOCANTINS	CBS	 10,408 	 12,105 	 12,997 	 1,697 	 2,589 	19.9%	65.5%<br />
20	24	FOX	 9,557 	 11,182 	 12,741 	 1,625 	 3,184 	25.0%	51.0%</p>
<p>Top 20 Adults 18-49 ratings Live +7<br />
Rank	Programs	Net	18-49 Live (rating)	18-49 Live+SD (rating)	18-49 Live+7 (rating)	Increase From DVR Viewing	% of All Viewing By DVR	% of DVR Viewing On Airdate<br />
1	AMERICAN IDOL-WEDNESDAY	FOX	7.75	9.24	9.85	27%	21%	71%<br />
2	AMERICAN IDOL-TUESDAY	FOX	7.49	9.13	9.84	31%	24%	70%<br />
3	NBC SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL	NBC	6.02	6.15	6.16	2%	2%	93%<br />
4	DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES	ABC	4.38	5.15	5.84	33%	25%	53%<br />
5	GREY&#8217;S ANATOMY-THU 9PM	ABC	4.01	4.76	5.72	43%	30%	44%<br />
6	HOUSE	FOX	3.82	4.62	5.45	43%	30%	49%<br />
7	CSI	CBS	4.15	4.55	5.30	28%	22%	35%<br />
8	LOST	ABC	3.33	4.24	5.17	55%	36%	49%<br />
9	TWO AND A HALF MEN	CBS	4.30	4.71	5.12	19%	16%	50%<br />
10	DANCING WITH THE STARS	ABC	4.19	4.65	4.89	17%	14%	66%<br />
11	OFFICE	NBC	3.10	4.01	4.86	57%	36%	52%<br />
12	SURVIVOR: GABON	CBS	3.49	4.20	4.64	33%	25%	62%<br />
13	OT, THE	FOX	4.37	4.45	4.45	2%	2%	100%<br />
14	HEROES	NBC	2.90	3.58	4.44	53%	35%	44%<br />
15	24	FOX	2.92	3.65	4.33	48%	33%	52%<br />
16	SURVIVOR: TOCANTINS	CBS	3.06	3.84	4.30	41%	29%	63%<br />
17	RULES OF ENGAGEMENT	CBS	3.57	3.91	4.23	18%	16%	52%<br />
18	BACHELOR, THE	ABC	3.52	3.97	4.19	19%	16%	67%<br />
19	FRINGE	FOX	3.09	3.54	4.17	35%	26%	42%<br />
20	BIGGEST LOSER 7	NBC	3.30	3.80	4.15	26%	20%	59%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99355</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99355</guid>
		<description>@Gusar

While I was being very sarcastic about the &quot;Summer Glau Exterminator&quot; remark I am very serious when I say the following

Summer Glau will apear at some point in Season 2 of Dollhouse. It will boost the ratings huge and will be followed by a &quot;Fan Fueled Fued&quot; real or inagined, between Summer Glau and Eliza Dushku over who is the &quot;Alpha Doll&quot;

Especially if you have an unamed blogger with a reputation for stirring up fans were to promote it.

Thats my prediction for Dollhouse Season 2.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gusar</p>
<p>While I was being very sarcastic about the &#8220;Summer Glau Exterminator&#8221; remark I am very serious when I say the following</p>
<p>Summer Glau will apear at some point in Season 2 of Dollhouse. It will boost the ratings huge and will be followed by a &#8220;Fan Fueled Fued&#8221; real or inagined, between Summer Glau and Eliza Dushku over who is the &#8220;Alpha Doll&#8221;</p>
<p>Especially if you have an unamed blogger with a reputation for stirring up fans were to promote it.</p>
<p>Thats my prediction for Dollhouse Season 2.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-3/#comment-99349</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99349</guid>
		<description>RSH - I suspect Gusar was refering to &lt;a href=&quot;http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/06/joss-whedon-buffy-dollhouse-1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;i&gt;...&quot;but we didn&#039;t honestly go into the season going, &#039;Now how can we figure out how to service Summer?&#039; when we already have a huge ensemble. I adore Summer and she&#039;s phenomenal, but I have to service the cast I have first. If something comes up that&#039;s good enough, my God, I&#039;d hound her. But the rumors of her becoming a big part of the show are greatly exaggerated.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSH &#8211; I suspect Gusar was refering to <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/06/joss-whedon-buffy-dollhouse-1.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>:</p>
<p><i>&#8230;&#8221;but we didn&#8217;t honestly go into the season going, &#8216;Now how can we figure out how to service Summer?&#8217; when we already have a huge ensemble. I adore Summer and she&#8217;s phenomenal, but I have to service the cast I have first. If something comes up that&#8217;s good enough, my God, I&#8217;d hound her. But the rumors of her becoming a big part of the show are greatly exaggerated.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/comment-page-2/#comment-99340</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99340</guid>
		<description>Bill, do you have a top 20 or more list with final live+7 viewers and 18-49 numbers for the season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, do you have a top 20 or more list with final live+7 viewers and 18-49 numbers for the season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

