An article in today's NY Times not only contains some numbers about the early days of O'Brien's , but also lots of excellent network PR spin!
One of the big questions facingO’Brien was this: How can he succeed with the older “ ” viewers? The answer: by making them younger.
In Mr. O’Brien’s first month as host, the median age of “” viewers has fallen by a decade — to 45 from 55, a startling shift in such a short time. This audience composition means advertisers can now address almost exclusively young viewers on “Tonight,” and NBC is already contemplating a shift in how it sells the show.
In network television, where audiences tend to age up consistently, this is an eye-popping development. But the shift is not all good news for NBC. One way Mr. O’Brien has lowered the age is by losing many older viewers.
For TV advertising, we know that a younger audience is generally better, so thats good news, right?
“TheWith David Letterman” has already posted one week in which it drew more viewers than Mr. O’Brien, who reached the smallest audience in “Tonight” show history, just 3.3 million viewers, about two million fewer than Jay Leno’s average as host.
However, smaller audiences are worse, so that's bad news, right?
Sadly, neither of those quotes really gives enough information to be particularly useful.
(The next week Mr. O’Brien bounced back and edged past Mr. Letterman in total viewers, 3.7 million to 3.5 million. It was an unusual week as the death of Michael Jackson elevated a third competitor, “” on ABC, to most-watched status with 3.9 million viewers for its half-hour.)
is certainly making hay while the Jackson death frenzy shines, but I'd completely disregard weeks like last week as being predictive of anything though.
The numbers in late night have been tossed around with unusual aggression as NBC and CBS jockey for the spin’s high ground. If cash follows youth, as it often does in television, NBC may not care much.
“’s performance is, honestly, extraordinary,” said Alan Wurtzel, the president for research at NBC, adding that the show had overwhelming strength in the youngest demographic, viewers 18 to 34. “These kinds of transitions are hard, especially with an iconic program like the ‘ .’ ”
Now that's just some good, honest spin right there. Paycheck earned.
For its part, CBS argues that NBC’s claims about demographic superiority are strained, pointing to several weeks of declines for Mr. O’Brien in many audience groups. “’s strength is almost entirely in men between 18 and 34,” said David F. Poltrack, the president for research at CBS. “We’re gaining in other categories.” Mr. Letterman, for example, is up more than 50 percent among viewers over 50.
Nicely parried Mr. Poltrack, except for that last line. Did you actually mention viewers over 50? Pardon me, but that sounds disturbingly like the bottom of a barrel being scraped.
On the sidelines, advertising executives are taking a skeptical approach. Generally they concede that dominance in younger viewers remains a big advantage, while also questioning whether “Tonight,” always the “big tent” in late night, risks becoming too much a niche show, as Mr. O’Brien seemingly thins the herd of older viewers.
“The idea of buying network TV was to get those big boxcar ratings,” said Steven J. Farella, the president of the media buying agency TargetCast TCM. “They don’t usually get boxcar numbers anymore, but we don’t need minivan numbers.”
I don't know if I've ever written about this, but have you ever seen a quote from an advertising buyer that wasn't skeptical? These guys are always negotiating, even to NY Times reporters!
The argument in marketing offices is likely to continue. “We really don’t know anything yet,” said Shari Anne Brill, the senior vice president and programming director for Carat USA. She said the preseason ad sales period, known as the upfront, had not yet taken place; and, she said, there is the unresolved question of how Mr. Leno will fare when he moves into the weeknight 10 p.m. period for NBC.
“He could potentially eat some of Mr. O’Brien’s young,” she said.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! Best quote I've seen on the subject yet. And I completely agree, anyone making conclusions so early in the process is an idiot.
John Rash, senior vice president of the Campbell-Mithun agency, said, “All audiences have value, but the 18-to-49 audience has more value. You will make higher profits if you win with that audience.” He added, “You can still say you’re the No. 1 show if you are more profitable.”
That is exactly what NBC is doing. After one week the network sent out a hyperventilating press release declaring Mr. O’Brien the “new king of late night.”
True enough on the value of the 18-49 audience, but I agree that NBC's spin belies a bit of nervousness.
Mr. Poltrack scoffed that the claim was preposterously premature, pointing to falloffs in succeeding weeks among groups like women 18 to 49. In his first week, Mr. O’Brien was up in that group from Mr. Leno’s performance by 32 percent; by the third week, he was down 28 percent.
Mr. Poltrack said the gap had especially narrowed among viewers 35 to 54. “I think eventually we will win that category,” he said.
Poltrack, always ready with the numbers to prove his point (as opposed to NBC's Wurtzel, note the differences in their quotes). I like that. He also pulls the discussion towards things that CBS might win, even if they're losing everywhere else.
One NBC executive, who asked not to be identified when citing what is usually confidential information, said the show had been selling about 65 percent of the commercials during “Tonight” on its 18-to-49, and 23 percent on viewers 25 to 54, and only 12 percent on the youngest category, viewers 18 to 34.
But Mr. O’Brien has been so overpowering in that last group that NBC can still be expected to shift more money toward that demographic — and to try to charge advertisers a premium for it, the executive said.
Of course this "executive", whoever it was, spoke on the direct orders of NBC PR. Were we born yesterday?
That may meet with resistance. Several ad agency executives said that young men could be reached more readily than in the past on Web sites and cable channels like Comedy Central and Spike, so networks deserve less of a premium for attracting them.
Some of that is probably negotiating talk. But Mr. Farella said he would worry about making “Tonight” look like a cable show.
“I don’t think that’s O.K.,” he said. “The goal of a broadcaster is still to be exactly that.”
Mr. Farella's dues in the skeptical ad agency club are completely paid up!
Mr. Rash said the changes in the “Tonight” audience were to be expected. “Jay Leno was younger than Johnny Carson, but he was from the same modern comedian construct, whereas Conan O’Brien is perfectly postmodern in his approach,” he said. “That may be alienating to older viewers. But he has to play to his strengths. Television and politics are the same: it’s a mistake to ignore your base.”
Hardly seems skeptical enough. Mr. Farella, please have a talk with Mr. Rash.
Mr. Wurtzel argued that Mr. O’Brien had no intention of turning “Tonight” into a niche show.
“I think we’re going to see growth,” he said. “The show has to calibrate. Conan is reshaping the profile of the show’s audience. It’s going according to plan.”
Calibrate? Reshaping? Vague and wish-washy. CBS's Poltrack would have thrown up some numbers, even as a smoke screen.
Both he and Mr. Poltrack offered one consistent analysis using exactly the same words: “Let’s see where we are in September.”