Comments on: Roddick/Federer Wimbledon Final Scores A 4.2 Rating, Falls Short Of Last Year's Nadal/Federer Final http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/06/roddickfederer-wimbledon-final-scores-a-4-2-rating-falls-short-of-last-years-nadalfederer-final/22369/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:00:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jason Clinkscales http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/06/roddickfederer-wimbledon-final-scores-a-4-2-rating-falls-short-of-last-years-nadalfederer-final/22369/comment-page-1/#comment-101925 Jason Clinkscales Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:10:22 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22369#comment-101925 Though I did not see the match, I am actually not surprised by the ratings (though they were still very strong, it appears). Because Roddick's inconsistency over the last few years, he hasn't exactly been top of mind for much of the casual watchers of tennis compared to Federer or Nadal. With that said, his impressive resurgence over the past few tournaments makes the upcoming U.S. Open that much more intriguing on the men's side. Between Roddick's play, the eventual return of Nadal, Federer's push for 20 Grand Slams (might as well just put the number out there) and a strong contenders in Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray, I think we can start talking about one of the most talked-about Opens in years. Though I did not see the match, I am actually not surprised by the ratings (though they were still very strong, it appears). Because Roddick’s inconsistency over the last few years, he hasn’t exactly been top of mind for much of the casual watchers of tennis compared to Federer or Nadal.

With that said, his impressive resurgence over the past few tournaments makes the upcoming U.S. Open that much more intriguing on the men’s side. Between Roddick’s play, the eventual return of Nadal, Federer’s push for 20 Grand Slams (might as well just put the number out there) and a strong contenders in Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray, I think we can start talking about one of the most talked-about Opens in years.

]]> By: Shem http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/06/roddickfederer-wimbledon-final-scores-a-4-2-rating-falls-short-of-last-years-nadalfederer-final/22369/comment-page-1/#comment-101918 Shem Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:46:09 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22369#comment-101918 so what were the total viewers? so what were the total viewers?

]]> By: tom http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/06/roddickfederer-wimbledon-final-scores-a-4-2-rating-falls-short-of-last-years-nadalfederer-final/22369/comment-page-1/#comment-101909 tom Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:33:04 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22369#comment-101909 It was one of the best Matches I have ever seen! Kept me on the edge of my seat and it didnt feel like it was over 4 hours long. Saying all that, I am surprised that it didnt beat the ratings for last years match It was one of the best Matches I have ever seen! Kept me on the edge of my seat and it didnt feel like it was over 4 hours long. Saying all that, I am surprised that it didnt beat the ratings for last years match

]]> By: Forgottenpatriot http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/06/roddickfederer-wimbledon-final-scores-a-4-2-rating-falls-short-of-last-years-nadalfederer-final/22369/comment-page-1/#comment-101904 Forgottenpatriot Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:01:51 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22369#comment-101904 that's pretty good, for Wimbledon. Go U.S.A! that’s pretty good, for Wimbledon. Go U.S.A!

]]>