<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conan O&#039;Brien Increases His 18-49 Lead Over &quot;Late Show&quot; Week to Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-2/#comment-105483</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-105483</guid>
		<description>&quot;letterman’s number’s havent seemed to change all that much from when leno was on. that makes me feel a little better. because i would hate to live in a world where someone flips over from conan or even leno to watch letterman…..watches for a few days and then thinks ‘this is a good show, i gotta make sure to watch every night’&quot;

Actually, these ratings for Letterman during the summer are pretty amazing. He usually pulls something like what Conan&#039;s pulling right now during the summer, but now he&#039;s pulling numbers that he usually only gets during the rest of the year.

And I hate to admit it, but Fallon&#039;s gotten a lot better, and he might actually put on a good show in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;letterman’s number’s havent seemed to change all that much from when leno was on. that makes me feel a little better. because i would hate to live in a world where someone flips over from conan or even leno to watch letterman…..watches for a few days and then thinks ‘this is a good show, i gotta make sure to watch every night’&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, these ratings for Letterman during the summer are pretty amazing. He usually pulls something like what Conan&#8217;s pulling right now during the summer, but now he&#8217;s pulling numbers that he usually only gets during the rest of the year.</p>
<p>And I hate to admit it, but Fallon&#8217;s gotten a lot better, and he might actually put on a good show in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kariato</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-2/#comment-105312</link>
		<dc:creator>kariato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-105312</guid>
		<description>Time to dump Jimmy Fallon, he&#039;s a good comedian but a horrible talk show host. If NBC had any brains they would have &quot;Amy Poehler&quot; sit in for him for a week and see how she did. Rotate a few other SNL people who actually write! A late night guy has to be able to write since the schedule is so demanding. Both Conan and Craig are heavy duty writers and that helps with the improve aspect of late night. &quot;Amy Poehler&quot; has the presence to make it work and a woman would make a nice change see how well Chelsea Lately is doing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to dump Jimmy Fallon, he&#8217;s a good comedian but a horrible talk show host. If NBC had any brains they would have &#8220;Amy Poehler&#8221; sit in for him for a week and see how she did. Rotate a few other SNL people who actually write! A late night guy has to be able to write since the schedule is so demanding. Both Conan and Craig are heavy duty writers and that helps with the improve aspect of late night. &#8220;Amy Poehler&#8221; has the presence to make it work and a woman would make a nice change see how well Chelsea Lately is doing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hector</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-2/#comment-105115</link>
		<dc:creator>hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-105115</guid>
		<description>these numbers are for the week of 13-17th.
adam sandler was on the 20th. god i hope conan&#039;s numbers are better for that week with sandler, jonah hill, zach galifianakis, and seth rogen.


letterman&#039;s number&#039;s havent seemed to change all that much from when leno was on. that makes me feel a little better. because i would hate to live in a world where someone flips over from conan or even leno to watch letterman.....watches for a few days and then thinks &#039;this is a good show, i gotta make sure to watch every night&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these numbers are for the week of 13-17th.<br />
adam sandler was on the 20th. god i hope conan&#8217;s numbers are better for that week with sandler, jonah hill, zach galifianakis, and seth rogen.</p>
<p>letterman&#8217;s number&#8217;s havent seemed to change all that much from when leno was on. that makes me feel a little better. because i would hate to live in a world where someone flips over from conan or even leno to watch letterman&#8230;..watches for a few days and then thinks &#8216;this is a good show, i gotta make sure to watch every night&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-2/#comment-104745</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104745</guid>
		<description>Yeah Bill, the revised numbers still have that contradictory statement. Any ideas where they&#039;re getting that from? Or is there another revised version from NBC being sent today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Bill, the revised numbers still have that contradictory statement. Any ideas where they&#8217;re getting that from? Or is there another revised version from NBC being sent today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104653</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what was changed in the revised press release (6th paragraph):

They made a correction to say the Fallon was not in repeats...

Original:
“Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” scored convincing wins at 12:35 a.m. ET last week, taking the slot over CBS’s “Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson” by a 30 percent margin in 18-49 viewers and 90 percent in 18-34 viewers. Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though the Fallon rebroadcasts aired an hour later than the “Late Show” originals.

Revised:
“Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” scored convincing wins at 12:35 a.m. ET last week, taking the slot over CBS’s “Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson” by a 30 percent margin in 18-49 viewers and 90 percent in 18-34 viewers. Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though Fallon aired an hour later than “Late Show.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what was changed in the revised press release (6th paragraph):</p>
<p>They made a correction to say the Fallon was not in repeats&#8230;</p>
<p>Original:<br />
“Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” scored convincing wins at 12:35 a.m. ET last week, taking the slot over CBS’s “Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson” by a 30 percent margin in 18-49 viewers and 90 percent in 18-34 viewers. Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though the Fallon rebroadcasts aired an hour later than the “Late Show” originals.</p>
<p>Revised:<br />
“Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” scored convincing wins at 12:35 a.m. ET last week, taking the slot over CBS’s “Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson” by a 30 percent margin in 18-49 viewers and 90 percent in 18-34 viewers. Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though Fallon aired an hour later than “Late Show.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104647</link>
		<dc:creator>H.C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104647</guid>
		<description>Bottom line is that NBC didnt have any problems with their late-night shows, with all three of them winning their time slots but now they do.

As if they fixed their prime-time issues and they thought lets $%&amp;* this up as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom line is that NBC didnt have any problems with their late-night shows, with all three of them winning their time slots but now they do.</p>
<p>As if they fixed their prime-time issues and they thought lets $%&amp;* this up as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104608</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104608</guid>
		<description>Just compared the two press releases, the only difference is the revised release corrects this statement:

&quot;Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though the Fallon rebroadcasts aired an hour later than the “Late Show” originals.&quot;

Fallon wasn&#039;t in rebroadcasts last week, so this is the revised sentence:

&quot;Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though Fallon aired an hour later than “Late Show.”&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just compared the two press releases, the only difference is the revised release corrects this statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though the Fallon rebroadcasts aired an hour later than the “Late Show” originals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fallon wasn&#8217;t in rebroadcasts last week, so this is the revised sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fallon also delivered a bigger adult 18-34 audience than Letterman, though Fallon aired an hour later than “Late Show.”&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104604</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104604</guid>
		<description>&quot;The consenus is that everyone is doing okay business-wise and that each of the networks are making money on their franchises.&quot;

But if we all agreed to this (true) statement, no one would be able to theorize doom and gloom for Conan&#039;s career! We&#039;d have to abandon the notion that Jay Leno might come back to The Tonight Show!

On a more serious note, a few of us actually just find it fun to see who&#039;s &quot;winning&quot; the late-night wars, and aren&#039;t really hoping for anyone&#039;s failure and eventual firing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The consenus is that everyone is doing okay business-wise and that each of the networks are making money on their franchises.&#8221;</p>
<p>But if we all agreed to this (true) statement, no one would be able to theorize doom and gloom for Conan&#8217;s career! We&#8217;d have to abandon the notion that Jay Leno might come back to The Tonight Show!</p>
<p>On a more serious note, a few of us actually just find it fun to see who&#8217;s &#8220;winning&#8221; the late-night wars, and aren&#8217;t really hoping for anyone&#8217;s failure and eventual firing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104600</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104600</guid>
		<description>Do people really care about Adam Sandler?? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do people really care about Adam Sandler?? <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104598</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104598</guid>
		<description>Bill Carter had an interesting point on the NYT today.  The Tonight Show got virtually NO bump last monday when Adam Sandler was the guest.  Some people have been speculating that Conan&#039;s numbers were down due simply to inferior guests, but this flies in the face of that thinking.

I guess that isn&#039;t horrible news for Conan, considering that once Jay comes back at 10, his level of guests will drop down another notch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Carter had an interesting point on the NYT today.  The Tonight Show got virtually NO bump last monday when Adam Sandler was the guest.  Some people have been speculating that Conan&#8217;s numbers were down due simply to inferior guests, but this flies in the face of that thinking.</p>
<p>I guess that isn&#8217;t horrible news for Conan, considering that once Jay comes back at 10, his level of guests will drop down another notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strussman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104591</link>
		<dc:creator>strussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104591</guid>
		<description>To me it would seem as though NBC is spinning a line of b.s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it would seem as though NBC is spinning a line of b.s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strussman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104588</link>
		<dc:creator>strussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104588</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the numbers as reported by both CBS and NBC.  If Dave is winning in TOTAL numbers is that not a WIN?  Do demos REALLY matter?  And if so, if looks like Dave is gaining in all areas.  The consenus is that everyone is doing okay business-wise and that each of the networks are making money on their franchises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the numbers as reported by both CBS and NBC.  If Dave is winning in TOTAL numbers is that not a WIN?  Do demos REALLY matter?  And if so, if looks like Dave is gaining in all areas.  The consenus is that everyone is doing okay business-wise and that each of the networks are making money on their franchises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104587</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104587</guid>
		<description>The revised press release still has the same key fact wrong, claiming that Conan&#039;s 18-49 lead increased week to week when it didn&#039;t (it went from 0.3 to 0.2).  Making claims that are simply outright wrong takes the fun out of spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revised press release still has the same key fact wrong, claiming that Conan&#8217;s 18-49 lead increased week to week when it didn&#8217;t (it went from 0.3 to 0.2).  Making claims that are simply outright wrong takes the fun out of spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104575</guid>
		<description>Jeff, as I was reading over the comments, NBC sent out a revised press release. I put it at the top of the post with the original below. I didn&#039;t look at it at all because its child care time here, but some may want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, as I was reading over the comments, NBC sent out a revised press release. I put it at the top of the post with the original below. I didn&#8217;t look at it at all because its child care time here, but some may want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104571</guid>
		<description>I just took a look and last week Conan had a 1.1 vs Dave&#039;s .8, this week it&#039;s a 1.0 vs .8 - where does NBC get that Conan is increasing his lead in that demo week to week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just took a look and last week Conan had a 1.1 vs Dave&#8217;s .8, this week it&#8217;s a 1.0 vs .8 &#8211; where does NBC get that Conan is increasing his lead in that demo week to week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104570</guid>
		<description>How is it possible the CBS spin says Dave has narrowed the gap in 18-49 to the closest since Conan took over Tonight, but the NBC spin literally says the opposite. Usually I can see where CBS touts the total viewers and NBC the demos, but this is just literally contradictory. Am I reading that wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it possible the CBS spin says Dave has narrowed the gap in 18-49 to the closest since Conan took over Tonight, but the NBC spin literally says the opposite. Usually I can see where CBS touts the total viewers and NBC the demos, but this is just literally contradictory. Am I reading that wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104564</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104564</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well back in June (I don’t think anyone does week-by-week numbers for this show), Chelsea Lately was averaging around 1 million viewers at 11 pm. Back when it was at 11:30 pm, it was getting about 600,000 viewers. So in the cable late night talk show race, it’s losing to Comedy Central’s offerings.&quot;

It increased 400,000 viewers though?  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well back in June (I don’t think anyone does week-by-week numbers for this show), Chelsea Lately was averaging around 1 million viewers at 11 pm. Back when it was at 11:30 pm, it was getting about 600,000 viewers. So in the cable late night talk show race, it’s losing to Comedy Central’s offerings.&#8221;</p>
<p>It increased 400,000 viewers though?  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104547</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104547</guid>
		<description>Well back in June (I don&#039;t think anyone does week-by-week numbers for this show), Chelsea Lately was averaging around 1 million viewers at 11 pm. Back when it was at 11:30 pm, it was getting about 600,000 viewers. So in the cable late night talk show race, it&#039;s losing to Comedy Central&#039;s offerings.

I didn&#039;t see Michael Jackson coverage on what I watched of Nightline, and someone commented on one of these press releases that there was very little focus on MJ. There&#039;s nothing really left to cover of the story anyway, seeing as how his viewing/funeral was Tuesday (or Monday, I forget) two weeks ago, and nothing has happened since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well back in June (I don&#8217;t think anyone does week-by-week numbers for this show), Chelsea Lately was averaging around 1 million viewers at 11 pm. Back when it was at 11:30 pm, it was getting about 600,000 viewers. So in the cable late night talk show race, it&#8217;s losing to Comedy Central&#8217;s offerings.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see Michael Jackson coverage on what I watched of Nightline, and someone commented on one of these press releases that there was very little focus on MJ. There&#8217;s nothing really left to cover of the story anyway, seeing as how his viewing/funeral was Tuesday (or Monday, I forget) two weeks ago, and nothing has happened since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104539</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104539</guid>
		<description>Oh no no I agree - I just find it silly how NBC can keep touting stuff like &quot;X% growth!&quot;, &quot;Up by X!&quot;, &quot;Beat Late Show by Y!&quot; etc. etc....I guess the spin-meisters are doing their job though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no no I agree &#8211; I just find it silly how NBC can keep touting stuff like &#8220;X% growth!&#8221;, &#8220;Up by X!&#8221;, &#8220;Beat Late Show by Y!&#8221; etc. etc&#8230;.I guess the spin-meisters are doing their job though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104537</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104537</guid>
		<description>Anon, while I agree those are the relevant numbers, I still think it&#039;s too early to make long term guesses. Leno at 10 is a wildcard that will certainly effect Conan and Dave, and perhaps Nightline. Most people assume Leno at 10 is a negative for Conan. I am not so sure.

Also, and I admit to not knowing at all, was Nightline still Michael Jackson focused last week? If so, their numbers cannot be projected to the future reliably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, while I agree those are the relevant numbers, I still think it&#8217;s too early to make long term guesses. Leno at 10 is a wildcard that will certainly effect Conan and Dave, and perhaps Nightline. Most people assume Leno at 10 is a negative for Conan. I am not so sure.</p>
<p>Also, and I admit to not knowing at all, was Nightline still Michael Jackson focused last week? If so, their numbers cannot be projected to the future reliably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104531</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104531</guid>
		<description>Spin, spin, spin by NBC - boy I&#039;m getting dizzy!

Bottom line:

NBC “Tonight,” 1.0 rating, 5 share
CBS “Late Show,” 0.8/3
ABC “Nightline,” 0.9/4


Conan&#039;s lead is dwindling, big time...week after week, THESE 3 lines of the press release show the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spin, spin, spin by NBC &#8211; boy I&#8217;m getting dizzy!</p>
<p>Bottom line:</p>
<p>NBC “Tonight,” 1.0 rating, 5 share<br />
CBS “Late Show,” 0.8/3<br />
ABC “Nightline,” 0.9/4</p>
<p>Conan&#8217;s lead is dwindling, big time&#8230;week after week, THESE 3 lines of the press release show the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104530</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104530</guid>
		<description>I wonder how Chelsea Lately is doing since she has one of the best late night shows right now.  I just found her show a few weeks ago, and I love it.  Its a great replacement now that Conan has taken over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Chelsea Lately is doing since she has one of the best late night shows right now.  I just found her show a few weeks ago, and I love it.  Its a great replacement now that Conan has taken over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Robot !</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Robot !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104511</guid>
		<description>I rarely waste time staying up that late to watch David LITTERMAN and CONEHEAD OBrien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely waste time staying up that late to watch David LITTERMAN and CONEHEAD OBrien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104501</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104501</guid>
		<description>If that were true, they&#039;d be promoting their numbers for the first half-hour along with their full hour-long numbers. That especially can&#039;t be true of The Tonight Show since, given their hour-long average of 2.7 million, they&#039;d have to drop off by two million viewers from their first half-hour just to have tied Nightline in the first half-hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that were true, they&#8217;d be promoting their numbers for the first half-hour along with their full hour-long numbers. That especially can&#8217;t be true of The Tonight Show since, given their hour-long average of 2.7 million, they&#8217;d have to drop off by two million viewers from their first half-hour just to have tied Nightline in the first half-hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104494</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104494</guid>
		<description>Neither of them address Nightline because Nightline is a non-factor.  It&#039;s numbers only look good because it has half-hour numbers being compared against hour-long averages.  If you were to compare its numbers strictly with the first half of Dave &amp; Conan, Nightline would be coming in third.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither of them address Nightline because Nightline is a non-factor.  It&#8217;s numbers only look good because it has half-hour numbers being compared against hour-long averages.  If you were to compare its numbers strictly with the first half of Dave &amp; Conan, Nightline would be coming in third.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSA</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/conan-obrien-increases-his-18-49-lead-over-late-show-week-to-week/23393/comment-page-1/#comment-104490</link>
		<dc:creator>TSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23393#comment-104490</guid>
		<description>Ouch, I think Conan is starting to cut into Fallon. Ferguson outright beating a week of new Fallons is pretty amazing considering this had been a very even match for a while.

Conan only increased his 18-49 lead by about fifty thousand viewers, and he actually slipped in 18-49 from last week. Neither CBS nor NBC really wants to address Nightline managing to win post-Michael Jackson.

Kimmel can&#039;t seem to benefit from Nightline at all. He&#039;d probably even rather have Conan as a lead-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, I think Conan is starting to cut into Fallon. Ferguson outright beating a week of new Fallons is pretty amazing considering this had been a very even match for a while.</p>
<p>Conan only increased his 18-49 lead by about fifty thousand viewers, and he actually slipped in 18-49 from last week. Neither CBS nor NBC really wants to address Nightline managing to win post-Michael Jackson.</p>
<p>Kimmel can&#8217;t seem to benefit from Nightline at all. He&#8217;d probably even rather have Conan as a lead-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

