<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video On Demand With Commercials But No Fast Forward Could Keep DVRs At Bay, So Why Aren&#039;t Networks Moving Faster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/comment-page-1/#comment-104583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23370#comment-104583</guid>
		<description>People will find a way to skip that - they don&#039;t want the junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People will find a way to skip that &#8211; they don&#8217;t want the junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DVR!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/comment-page-1/#comment-104512</link>
		<dc:creator>DVR!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23370#comment-104512</guid>
		<description>Total crap. I want my DVR left alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total crap. I want my DVR left alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/comment-page-1/#comment-104507</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23370#comment-104507</guid>
		<description>all commercials front loaded = doing something else while waiting for the real show to begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all commercials front loaded = doing something else while waiting for the real show to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmoker</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/comment-page-1/#comment-104497</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23370#comment-104497</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, this would be a good move for nets in the short term.  On the other hand, long term it will expire faster than the Edsel.  Once people get a taste of DVRs, studies have shown that the overwhelming majority cannot conceive of going back.  As DVR penetration continues, and as more and more people get used to skipping commercials, use of VOD with full load commercials will sink like a stone.  In the interim, however, this could definitely help any network willing to do it, but I can&#039;t see it&#039;s shelf life lasting more than five years or so, tops.  

Well, I guess that would make it somewhat more long lasting than the Edsel.

Still, this would be a stop-gap measure at best.  Good idea, so long as it is used as a method for allowing nets to come up with something better.  Any network who tries this thinking it&#039;s a long term solution will end up pants down in the end.

Biggest problem: many people with DVR service probably won&#039;t even try this even if they forget to record something, because they have become so conditioned to commerical-free TV.  So your only real target demo are DVR-less people, which is a continually shrinking audience with a finite expiration date.  So they better get cracking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, this would be a good move for nets in the short term.  On the other hand, long term it will expire faster than the Edsel.  Once people get a taste of DVRs, studies have shown that the overwhelming majority cannot conceive of going back.  As DVR penetration continues, and as more and more people get used to skipping commercials, use of VOD with full load commercials will sink like a stone.  In the interim, however, this could definitely help any network willing to do it, but I can&#8217;t see it&#8217;s shelf life lasting more than five years or so, tops.  </p>
<p>Well, I guess that would make it somewhat more long lasting than the Edsel.</p>
<p>Still, this would be a stop-gap measure at best.  Good idea, so long as it is used as a method for allowing nets to come up with something better.  Any network who tries this thinking it&#8217;s a long term solution will end up pants down in the end.</p>
<p>Biggest problem: many people with DVR service probably won&#8217;t even try this even if they forget to record something, because they have become so conditioned to commerical-free TV.  So your only real target demo are DVR-less people, which is a continually shrinking audience with a finite expiration date.  So they better get cracking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy B.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/23/video-on-demand-with-commercials-but-no-fast-forward-could-keep-dvrs-at-bay-so-why-arent-networks-moving-faster/23370/comment-page-1/#comment-104470</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23370#comment-104470</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth it to me to pay the extra money for DVR just to skip the commercials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth it to me to pay the extra money for DVR just to skip the commercials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

