<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drinking the Dollhouse Epitaph One Kool-Aid (NO spoilers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-106297</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-106297</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;I can’t remember – was it ever explained in the last episodes WHO was sending the information out to Ballard from within the Dollhouse via Echo’s and November’s programming?&quot;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(Tried to post this yesterday but the posting didn&#039;t go through)

Yeah, check &quot;Spy in the house of love&quot;. (*SPOILER*) Dominic is an NSA agent, did the reprogramming, and ends up being caught and sent to the attic. (*END SPOILER*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<i>&#8220;I can’t remember – was it ever explained in the last episodes WHO was sending the information out to Ballard from within the Dollhouse via Echo’s and November’s programming?&#8221;<br />
</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>(Tried to post this yesterday but the posting didn&#8217;t go through)</p>
<p>Yeah, check &#8220;Spy in the house of love&#8221;. (*SPOILER*) Dominic is an NSA agent, did the reprogramming, and ends up being caught and sent to the attic. (*END SPOILER*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-106141</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-106141</guid>
		<description>Well, watched EO, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://squiggleslash.livejournal.com/8208.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thought it was &quot;OK&quot;&lt;/a&gt; rather than something amazing. But I&#039;m wierd like that, I didn&#039;t think Firefly was everything it was cracked up to be either. Disliked the format (it felt like a clip show) and felt they tried to cram so many concepts into that episode that in the end the underlying &quot;This is what happened in the end&quot; part just ended up being confusing. I&#039;m pretty sure they&#039;re trying to imply (*SPOILER*) that Topher invented the technology that ended up destroying civilization, presumably with Rossum pressing the button (*END SPOILER*) but I&#039;m still a little confused.

I also really don&#039;t like the &quot;This isn&#039;t just about imprinting personalities, but making other people be you&quot; thing that was started by &lt;i&gt;Haunted&lt;/i&gt;.

Not the best episode ever. It&#039;s OK, but I&#039;d say that if it had been one of the first five, then it would have been one of the better episodes, but compared to the series as a whole, it was fairly middling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, watched EO, and <a href="http://squiggleslash.livejournal.com/8208.html" rel="nofollow">thought it was &#8220;OK&#8221;</a> rather than something amazing. But I&#8217;m wierd like that, I didn&#8217;t think Firefly was everything it was cracked up to be either. Disliked the format (it felt like a clip show) and felt they tried to cram so many concepts into that episode that in the end the underlying &#8220;This is what happened in the end&#8221; part just ended up being confusing. I&#8217;m pretty sure they&#8217;re trying to imply (*SPOILER*) that Topher invented the technology that ended up destroying civilization, presumably with Rossum pressing the button (*END SPOILER*) but I&#8217;m still a little confused.</p>
<p>I also really don&#8217;t like the &#8220;This isn&#8217;t just about imprinting personalities, but making other people be you&#8221; thing that was started by <i>Haunted</i>.</p>
<p>Not the best episode ever. It&#8217;s OK, but I&#8217;d say that if it had been one of the first five, then it would have been one of the better episodes, but compared to the series as a whole, it was fairly middling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-106115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-106115</guid>
		<description>I also think the original pilot was far more compelling and coherent than the first episode that was aired. Then they took the pilot, chopped up the mythology and sprinkled it throughout the first 6 episodes. 

Very similar to Firefly- the ep they showed as the &quot;pilot&quot; was more lame and unfocused than the original Joss had made. 

Virtually every review I&#039;ve read of the unaired Dollhouse pilot finds it a huge improvement over what was aired. Is there a faint hope that Fox might learn from this? To trust Joss, and more importantly, to give the audience a little credit? To trust us, too? Because their meddling really messed with the flow of the show.

Interestingly, in the special features of the DVD, there is a bit where Tahmoh (Ballard) is confused at what point in the timeline he is acting in- because they filmed the episodes out of order! Joss is explaining the sequence of events to him- ditching the pilot actually confused everyone, as they weren&#039;t sure what was being jettisoned, and what was being left in the mythology of the show. Joss was sort of apologetic at how Tahmoh&#039;s character was being revised on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the original pilot was far more compelling and coherent than the first episode that was aired. Then they took the pilot, chopped up the mythology and sprinkled it throughout the first 6 episodes. </p>
<p>Very similar to Firefly- the ep they showed as the &#8220;pilot&#8221; was more lame and unfocused than the original Joss had made. </p>
<p>Virtually every review I&#8217;ve read of the unaired Dollhouse pilot finds it a huge improvement over what was aired. Is there a faint hope that Fox might learn from this? To trust Joss, and more importantly, to give the audience a little credit? To trust us, too? Because their meddling really messed with the flow of the show.</p>
<p>Interestingly, in the special features of the DVD, there is a bit where Tahmoh (Ballard) is confused at what point in the timeline he is acting in- because they filmed the episodes out of order! Joss is explaining the sequence of events to him- ditching the pilot actually confused everyone, as they weren&#8217;t sure what was being jettisoned, and what was being left in the mythology of the show. Joss was sort of apologetic at how Tahmoh&#8217;s character was being revised on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105747</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105747</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, as I did previously, that Olivia looked particularly gorgeous in that scene, from which the pic above was taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, as I did previously, that Olivia looked particularly gorgeous in that scene, from which the pic above was taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105746</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105746</guid>
		<description>Saw the un-aired pilot last night. I have to agree that it would have been a better first episode than the one that aired. It moved the story along much faster than the first few episodes that aired. Caroline/Echo was more interesting.

Interesting that the segment with Adelle talking to the client ended up in Epitaph One.

I can&#039;t remember - was it ever explained in the last episodes WHO was sending the information out to Ballard from within the Dollhouse via Echo&#039;s and November&#039;s programming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the un-aired pilot last night. I have to agree that it would have been a better first episode than the one that aired. It moved the story along much faster than the first few episodes that aired. Caroline/Echo was more interesting.</p>
<p>Interesting that the segment with Adelle talking to the client ended up in Epitaph One.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember &#8211; was it ever explained in the last episodes WHO was sending the information out to Ballard from within the Dollhouse via Echo&#8217;s and November&#8217;s programming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pad</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105469</link>
		<dc:creator>Pad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105469</guid>
		<description>Steven Hack wrote - Also, there are two kinds of dystopias one can produce. You could call one the “disaster future”, where most people are dead or zombies or whatever, there is no economy or society per se, and there is little resources the heroes can draw on to survive. The other is the “cyberpunk” future where things are basically worse than they are now but there is still technology, some sort of economy (even if it’s all black market), and some sort of society, and the heroes have options other than scrounging for food and water. Not since the Mad Max movies have I bothered to be interested in scenario one, since they generally treat the future as hopeless. Scenario two is the only future I bother to consider watching. As a Transhumanist, I consider scenario one to be unacceptable, while scenario two is actually probable and pregnant with possibility.

The first scenario worked in Threads pretty believable as well, and comically in A Boy and his Dog. Although most films/shows that follow that route can be a tad goofy and hard to accept like you said. 2019, After the Fall of New York for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Hack wrote &#8211; Also, there are two kinds of dystopias one can produce. You could call one the “disaster future”, where most people are dead or zombies or whatever, there is no economy or society per se, and there is little resources the heroes can draw on to survive. The other is the “cyberpunk” future where things are basically worse than they are now but there is still technology, some sort of economy (even if it’s all black market), and some sort of society, and the heroes have options other than scrounging for food and water. Not since the Mad Max movies have I bothered to be interested in scenario one, since they generally treat the future as hopeless. Scenario two is the only future I bother to consider watching. As a Transhumanist, I consider scenario one to be unacceptable, while scenario two is actually probable and pregnant with possibility.</p>
<p>The first scenario worked in Threads pretty believable as well, and comically in A Boy and his Dog. Although most films/shows that follow that route can be a tad goofy and hard to accept like you said. 2019, After the Fall of New York for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pad</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105463</link>
		<dc:creator>Pad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105463</guid>
		<description>It was a nice little coda that is rendered rather moot since they renewed the show, something I&#039;m convinced Whedon never expected to happen based on this.

They give you the entire &quot;plan&quot; for the show in 49 minutes. The fun now will be watching them furiously trying to backpedal and call this one possible future or some such gubbins. Still being an Apocalypse junkie I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a nice little coda that is rendered rather moot since they renewed the show, something I&#8217;m convinced Whedon never expected to happen based on this.</p>
<p>They give you the entire &#8220;plan&#8221; for the show in 49 minutes. The fun now will be watching them furiously trying to backpedal and call this one possible future or some such gubbins. Still being an Apocalypse junkie I enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105362</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105362</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve just watched Epitaph One. Very interesting. 

However, it was a bit claustrophobic since it takes place pretty much entirely within the confines of the Dollhouse. If this is what Joss means by how season 2 will look, it means the budget cuts are going to be drastic and very rarely will we see any location shooting as we did in season one. That&#039;s going to be VERY claustrophobic VERY quickly.

My next question would be: is it Joss&#039; intention to weave back and forth from the present to the dystopian future? If so, he&#039;d best be careful. This is one area where you can completely screw up - ask Josh Friedman. It&#039;s nearly as bad as using time travel.

It would be far more preferable to keep everything in the present but give hints of how such a dystopian future could occur based on people&#039;s actions in the present.

Also, there are two kinds of dystopias one can produce. You could call one the &quot;disaster future&quot;, where most people are dead or zombies or whatever, there is no economy or society per se, and there is little resources the heroes can draw on to survive. The other is the &quot;cyberpunk&quot; future where things are basically worse than they are now but there is still technology, some sort of economy (even if it&#039;s all black market), and some sort of society, and the heroes have options other than scrounging for food and water. Not since the Mad Max movies have I bothered to be interested in scenario one, since they generally treat the future as hopeless. Scenario two is the only future I bother to consider watching. As a Transhumanist, I consider scenario one to be unacceptable, while scenario two is actually probable and pregnant with possibility.

So I would hope Whedon isn&#039;t heading for scenario one, although Epitaph One certainly looked like it.

Finally, I thought the Caroline in Epitaph One was very different from the Echo we saw throughout season one, and much preferable. And it was nice to see Amy Acker without the scars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve just watched Epitaph One. Very interesting. </p>
<p>However, it was a bit claustrophobic since it takes place pretty much entirely within the confines of the Dollhouse. If this is what Joss means by how season 2 will look, it means the budget cuts are going to be drastic and very rarely will we see any location shooting as we did in season one. That&#8217;s going to be VERY claustrophobic VERY quickly.</p>
<p>My next question would be: is it Joss&#8217; intention to weave back and forth from the present to the dystopian future? If so, he&#8217;d best be careful. This is one area where you can completely screw up &#8211; ask Josh Friedman. It&#8217;s nearly as bad as using time travel.</p>
<p>It would be far more preferable to keep everything in the present but give hints of how such a dystopian future could occur based on people&#8217;s actions in the present.</p>
<p>Also, there are two kinds of dystopias one can produce. You could call one the &#8220;disaster future&#8221;, where most people are dead or zombies or whatever, there is no economy or society per se, and there is little resources the heroes can draw on to survive. The other is the &#8220;cyberpunk&#8221; future where things are basically worse than they are now but there is still technology, some sort of economy (even if it&#8217;s all black market), and some sort of society, and the heroes have options other than scrounging for food and water. Not since the Mad Max movies have I bothered to be interested in scenario one, since they generally treat the future as hopeless. Scenario two is the only future I bother to consider watching. As a Transhumanist, I consider scenario one to be unacceptable, while scenario two is actually probable and pregnant with possibility.</p>
<p>So I would hope Whedon isn&#8217;t heading for scenario one, although Epitaph One certainly looked like it.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought the Caroline in Epitaph One was very different from the Echo we saw throughout season one, and much preferable. And it was nice to see Amy Acker without the scars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua K.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105341</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105341</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else think that Felicia Day should become a regular?  I &lt;3 her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else think that Felicia Day should become a regular?  I &lt;3 her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Budo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105306</link>
		<dc:creator>Budo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105306</guid>
		<description>What the original pilot has going for it the most is the fact that it pretty much covers the first five episodes worth of the &quot;meat&quot; of the show. The network stretched it out and added filler that no one liked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the original pilot has going for it the most is the fact that it pretty much covers the first five episodes worth of the &#8220;meat&#8221; of the show. The network stretched it out and added filler that no one liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105296</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105296</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even think the original pilot was that culty - but it certainly was better than what aired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even think the original pilot was that culty &#8211; but it certainly was better than what aired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105282</link>
		<dc:creator>Maia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105282</guid>
		<description>I think the unaired pilot was WAY better than the one they aired. Yes, it has &quot;cult&quot; written all over it, but so what? What&#039;s wrong with having a cult show? There&#039;re quite few on TV right now. Probably two.
I wanted something to be excited about every week, not just to pass the time. FOX really screw it over. They made Joss change the pilot and then it was hard to pick it up from there. I hope the writers get more freedom on the 2nd season, the network needs to have some faith.

Although, it is probably true that the Dollhouse audience are all Joss Whedon&#039;s die-hard fans, or the vast majority. So i can understand why the network wanted something like the aired pilot rather than the original one.

On the other hand, Epitaph One was bloody fantastic! It was interesting, well-written, spoilery... it had everything a Whedon fan would expect. And i want more like that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the unaired pilot was WAY better than the one they aired. Yes, it has &#8220;cult&#8221; written all over it, but so what? What&#8217;s wrong with having a cult show? There&#8217;re quite few on TV right now. Probably two.<br />
I wanted something to be excited about every week, not just to pass the time. FOX really screw it over. They made Joss change the pilot and then it was hard to pick it up from there. I hope the writers get more freedom on the 2nd season, the network needs to have some faith.</p>
<p>Although, it is probably true that the Dollhouse audience are all Joss Whedon&#8217;s die-hard fans, or the vast majority. So i can understand why the network wanted something like the aired pilot rather than the original one.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Epitaph One was bloody fantastic! It was interesting, well-written, spoilery&#8230; it had everything a Whedon fan would expect. And i want more like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: budo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105253</link>
		<dc:creator>budo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105253</guid>
		<description>I just read her tweet, too. She&#039;s brilliant, and simply adorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read her tweet, too. She&#8217;s brilliant, and simply adorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105238</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105238</guid>
		<description>Hey Robert, hottie Maurissa &quot;She could do so much better than Jed&quot; Tancharoen write of Dollhouse and just before the credits in Epitaph One singer, is reading your site *g*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robert, hottie Maurissa &#8220;She could do so much better than Jed&#8221; Tancharoen write of Dollhouse and just before the credits in Epitaph One singer, is reading your site *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midge</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-105120</link>
		<dc:creator>midge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-105120</guid>
		<description>I am a fan of Whedon, and have been gradually warming to Dollhouse once the first few, fairly banal episodes were out of the way.  Season 1 was in fact quite good by the end of the Season.
But Epitaph One?
Having seen it, and where the show could be headed, I am now definitely looking forward to a second season.  The Dollhouse seems to be heading in a more interesting direction.  I suppose we&#039;ll still have to put up with a few, more-or-less standalone episodes to keep the doddering old men of the networks happy, but as long as we can still see the actual series plot taking precedence, that could be bearable.
I&#039;m also going to be watching out for Fran Kranz in future serious dramatic roles (so far he&#039;s had more comedic roles than anything else), as the scene where he is standing in the kitchen, absorbing the conversation in front of him, silently confronting the potential consequences of his actions, is priceless.  He shows promise.
The only thing that could make me want to watch the next season any more, is if it were still in a double-slot with TSCC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of Whedon, and have been gradually warming to Dollhouse once the first few, fairly banal episodes were out of the way.  Season 1 was in fact quite good by the end of the Season.<br />
But Epitaph One?<br />
Having seen it, and where the show could be headed, I am now definitely looking forward to a second season.  The Dollhouse seems to be heading in a more interesting direction.  I suppose we&#8217;ll still have to put up with a few, more-or-less standalone episodes to keep the doddering old men of the networks happy, but as long as we can still see the actual series plot taking precedence, that could be bearable.<br />
I&#8217;m also going to be watching out for Fran Kranz in future serious dramatic roles (so far he&#8217;s had more comedic roles than anything else), as the scene where he is standing in the kitchen, absorbing the conversation in front of him, silently confronting the potential consequences of his actions, is priceless.  He shows promise.<br />
The only thing that could make me want to watch the next season any more, is if it were still in a double-slot with TSCC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-104986</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104986</guid>
		<description>I have not seen Epitaph One, but being the best episode wouldn&#039;t be that hard since the episodes of Dollhouse that I saw were not located even in the slums of Good.

I&#039;m not a Whedon basher. I thought Firefly fans had a point.

Dollhouse? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen Epitaph One, but being the best episode wouldn&#8217;t be that hard since the episodes of Dollhouse that I saw were not located even in the slums of Good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Whedon basher. I thought Firefly fans had a point.</p>
<p>Dollhouse? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AO</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-104971</link>
		<dc:creator>AO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104971</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m not a Whedon fanboy&quot;

Despite that, you&#039;re still good people. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m not a Whedon fanboy&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite that, you&#8217;re still good people. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Budo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-104966</link>
		<dc:creator>Budo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104966</guid>
		<description>Richard, shouldn&#039;t that be the other way around? Kate is great, but she can only aspire to one day achieve a similar screen presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, shouldn&#8217;t that be the other way around? Kate is great, but she can only aspire to one day achieve a similar screen presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-2/#comment-104961</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104961</guid>
		<description>By the way, that&#039;s a great pic of Olivia. She&#039;s my favorite on the show. I love &quot;cool but hot&quot; Brits! She reminds me so much of Kate Beckinsale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, that&#8217;s a great pic of Olivia. She&#8217;s my favorite on the show. I love &#8220;cool but hot&#8221; Brits! She reminds me so much of Kate Beckinsale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104955</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104955</guid>
		<description>Twin Peaks, I say no. It&#039;d be either The Office in September or Lost in I think December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twin Peaks, I say no. It&#8217;d be either The Office in September or Lost in I think December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twin Peaks</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104941</link>
		<dc:creator>Twin Peaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104941</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse is the only TV show that will even approach the DVD sales of True Blood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse is the only TV show that will even approach the DVD sales of True Blood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104928</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104928</guid>
		<description>so they have one roll over episode from last season? will it air along with the 13 episodes second season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so they have one roll over episode from last season? will it air along with the 13 episodes second season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104925</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104925</guid>
		<description>Adding my nod here. Epitaph one was fantastic - if season one was convoluted and at times seemed aimless, this ep definitely renewed my interest in the show. I was left wondering, though, where do we go from here, knowing what&#039;s in store, be it a decade into the future.
Looking forward to season two. Friday nights are heating up this fall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding my nod here. Epitaph one was fantastic &#8211; if season one was convoluted and at times seemed aimless, this ep definitely renewed my interest in the show. I was left wondering, though, where do we go from here, knowing what&#8217;s in store, be it a decade into the future.<br />
Looking forward to season two. Friday nights are heating up this fall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twin Peaks</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104922</link>
		<dc:creator>Twin Peaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104922</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding? Dushku&#039;s a great actress!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding? Dushku&#8217;s a great actress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104915</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104915</guid>
		<description>Yes this was a great episode, but then Dushku wasn&#039;t that much in it was she ;)

@Anthony
&quot;Nope, it’s the future, Joss said so.&quot;

Only now is - what was was, and what will be can be changed, regardless of what joss said. This is a possible future, and the short term future can change that - regardless of what he wants to do now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this was a great episode, but then Dushku wasn&#8217;t that much in it was she <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Anthony<br />
&#8220;Nope, it’s the future, Joss said so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Only now is &#8211; what was was, and what will be can be changed, regardless of what joss said. This is a possible future, and the short term future can change that &#8211; regardless of what he wants to do now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alpha</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104906</link>
		<dc:creator>alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104906</guid>
		<description>The last thing anyone should worry about is anyone not seeing this episode.  I have been confidently assured by multiple Whedon-bots that demand for the Dollhouse DVD is going to make the internet explode.

Do not be fooled by the fact that the Dollhouse DVD is currently number 140 on the Amazon sales chart.  Get your online affairs in order, on Wednesday the internet is going to be gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last thing anyone should worry about is anyone not seeing this episode.  I have been confidently assured by multiple Whedon-bots that demand for the Dollhouse DVD is going to make the internet explode.</p>
<p>Do not be fooled by the fact that the Dollhouse DVD is currently number 140 on the Amazon sales chart.  Get your online affairs in order, on Wednesday the internet is going to be gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104897</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104897</guid>
		<description>Guybrush:
Nope, it&#039;s the future, Joss said so.

Loved the episode. Agree with all your points completely. It&#039;s one hell of a teaser for Season 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guybrush:<br />
Nope, it&#8217;s the future, Joss said so.</p>
<p>Loved the episode. Agree with all your points completely. It&#8217;s one hell of a teaser for Season 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104894</link>
		<dc:creator>vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104894</guid>
		<description>Robert I was wondering how did u watch the unaired episode. Was of available on the itunes store??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert I was wondering how did u watch the unaired episode. Was of available on the itunes store??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104892</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104892</guid>
		<description>So funny because I do the same thing sometimes. Ride Caltrain 45 minutes to Mountainview every evening and finish watching shows in the station!

Couldn&#039;t agree with you more on &quot;Epitah&quot;

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So funny because I do the same thing sometimes. Ride Caltrain 45 minutes to Mountainview every evening and finish watching shows in the station!</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more on &#8220;Epitah&#8221;</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104890</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104890</guid>
		<description>&quot;since Stage Fright&quot;?

That was the worst episode of the series.  Losing Amy Acker means I&#039;m not interested in season two, especially if budget cuts means more Eliza and less of the supporting cast (which all act better than her.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;since Stage Fright&#8221;?</p>
<p>That was the worst episode of the series.  Losing Amy Acker means I&#8217;m not interested in season two, especially if budget cuts means more Eliza and less of the supporting cast (which all act better than her.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greennogo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104883</link>
		<dc:creator>greennogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104883</guid>
		<description>Having watched &quot;Echo&quot;--the original, unaired pilot--and &quot;Epitaph One&quot; back to back, they present a really intriguing microseason of what might have been without network intervention, and although the second half of the season did produce excellent episodes, the two that were unaired pretty much blew the majority of what they did broadcast for season one right out of the water.

That said, I can see why the network demanded changes, because as a pilot, &quot;Echo&quot; had &#039;cult audience&#039; written all over it.  But it is kinda ironic that &quot;Epitaph One&quot; is exactly the type of thing the network was nervous about producing, considering it was used as a sales tool for a second season order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having watched &#8220;Echo&#8221;&#8211;the original, unaired pilot&#8211;and &#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; back to back, they present a really intriguing microseason of what might have been without network intervention, and although the second half of the season did produce excellent episodes, the two that were unaired pretty much blew the majority of what they did broadcast for season one right out of the water.</p>
<p>That said, I can see why the network demanded changes, because as a pilot, &#8220;Echo&#8221; had &#8216;cult audience&#8217; written all over it.  But it is kinda ironic that &#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; is exactly the type of thing the network was nervous about producing, considering it was used as a sales tool for a second season order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104881</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104881</guid>
		<description>I thought it was definitely the best episode. The other eps of the show I would give at least an A- are 7-9. 

Generally, the first season was disappointing (especially in the end) but good. Epitaph One gives me the hope that S2 might be what I expect from the creator of Btvs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was definitely the best episode. The other eps of the show I would give at least an A- are 7-9. </p>
<p>Generally, the first season was disappointing (especially in the end) but good. Epitaph One gives me the hope that S2 might be what I expect from the creator of Btvs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rei</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104880</link>
		<dc:creator>Rei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104880</guid>
		<description>Actually the Epitaph One future IS THE future. What could be not real are possibly the episode&#039;s flashbacks: memories are subjective, personal, thy are not THE truth, but a part of it, a vision of it. At least this is Whedon&#039;s explaination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the Epitaph One future IS THE future. What could be not real are possibly the episode&#8217;s flashbacks: memories are subjective, personal, thy are not THE truth, but a part of it, a vision of it. At least this is Whedon&#8217;s explaination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guybrush</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104879</link>
		<dc:creator>Guybrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104879</guid>
		<description>The Epitaph One future, is A future. Not necessarily the real one, just a posible one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Epitaph One future, is A future. Not necessarily the real one, just a posible one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104866</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104866</guid>
		<description>buffywrestling - Personally I&#039;d recommend the 5th over the 4th, and avoid the 1st, but in any case, isn&#039;t it ironic that the &lt;i&gt;problem&lt;/i&gt; with Dollhouse is that Fox actually showed all the episodes, and screened them in the right order, unlike a certain other Whedon show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buffywrestling &#8211; Personally I&#8217;d recommend the 5th over the 4th, and avoid the 1st, but in any case, isn&#8217;t it ironic that the <i>problem</i> with Dollhouse is that Fox actually showed all the episodes, and screened them in the right order, unlike a certain other Whedon show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffywrestling</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104859</link>
		<dc:creator>buffywrestling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104859</guid>
		<description>Felicia Day is coming back in S2. Epitaph One I think is &quot;suggestive&quot;, meaning that it happens but is not the complete truth. Eye of the beholder...the &quot;Could Be&quot; future.

And dude. If you are going to watch the DVD: Original ep 1st, then 2nd, 4th; jump to ep 6, then watch it until the 13th. If you do that for me, I&#039;ll stalk Bill like he stalks JBF like he stalks Joss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felicia Day is coming back in S2. Epitaph One I think is &#8220;suggestive&#8221;, meaning that it happens but is not the complete truth. Eye of the beholder&#8230;the &#8220;Could Be&#8221; future.</p>
<p>And dude. If you are going to watch the DVD: Original ep 1st, then 2nd, 4th; jump to ep 6, then watch it until the 13th. If you do that for me, I&#8217;ll stalk Bill like he stalks JBF like he stalks Joss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104857</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104857</guid>
		<description>From another site, some recap of the Dollhouse panel at Comic Con:

Whedon was asked if the episode could be considered a “second pilot” for the series.

“I wouldn’t call it a second pilot but it is definitely a different vision and it will contain a lot of things about the characters and who they are and where they’re heading that people might not have seen or expected,” Whedon said.

There are a lot of developments expected more specifically for the character of Echo, portrayed by Eliza Dushku. When asked if it was somehow the case that the other dolls and the other characters in the show were somehow “projecting” onto Echo, Joss replied, “Yes, you’re very right to say that they’re projecting on her. A lot of her life, not just because she’s a doll, but also just in general, has to do with the fact that people become obsessive about her. But we are going to learn and starting in this season that they’re not wrong, that there is something truly special about her and that she is going to be a major in factor in what happens to Dollhouse over the next few years.”

Tahmoh Penikett’s Paul Ballard, an FBI agent who was focused on finding the Dollhouse and eventually did, (In fact, at the end of the first season he appeared to be joining the Dollhouse in some capacity) is another character facing some changes for the new season.

“We had always intended for Paul to find the Dollhouse and for his interaction to change because we didn’t want him to be like the reporter in ‘The Hulk,’ showing up too late every episode,” Whedon said of the Ballard character. “And now they’ve been working on him from the outside with November and his alliance with Echo is going to be really tested, because he’s going to be in there with her partially to protect her but also to find out what’s really going on. You know you can gaze into the abyss or you can actually live in it, it’s going to affect you. so we are going to see that while (Echo) is starting to grow, we’re going to see that everybody else really starting to come apart a little bit.”

“Dollhouse” is certainly a kind of abyss — without a doubt, it is the only show on television to so brazenly portray such ethically questionable and morally deep actions and situations. This is not lost on Whedon.

“I think with this show, I want to say to the people who have, you know, felt a connection with me, that maybe you want to back away and avoid eye contact,” he said. “That maybe there’s something horribly wrong with me, and this is my very poetical way of expressing that. I think of it as a work that actually frightens me at times in a way that my shows seldom got to. At the same time I have that sort of jolly love of everything that’s going on and have to be reminded that what I’m doing is reprehensible. So it’s a mature work in the sense that I grew up and went insane.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From another site, some recap of the Dollhouse panel at Comic Con:</p>
<p>Whedon was asked if the episode could be considered a “second pilot” for the series.</p>
<p>“I wouldn’t call it a second pilot but it is definitely a different vision and it will contain a lot of things about the characters and who they are and where they’re heading that people might not have seen or expected,” Whedon said.</p>
<p>There are a lot of developments expected more specifically for the character of Echo, portrayed by Eliza Dushku. When asked if it was somehow the case that the other dolls and the other characters in the show were somehow “projecting” onto Echo, Joss replied, “Yes, you’re very right to say that they’re projecting on her. A lot of her life, not just because she’s a doll, but also just in general, has to do with the fact that people become obsessive about her. But we are going to learn and starting in this season that they’re not wrong, that there is something truly special about her and that she is going to be a major in factor in what happens to Dollhouse over the next few years.”</p>
<p>Tahmoh Penikett’s Paul Ballard, an FBI agent who was focused on finding the Dollhouse and eventually did, (In fact, at the end of the first season he appeared to be joining the Dollhouse in some capacity) is another character facing some changes for the new season.</p>
<p>“We had always intended for Paul to find the Dollhouse and for his interaction to change because we didn’t want him to be like the reporter in ‘The Hulk,’ showing up too late every episode,” Whedon said of the Ballard character. “And now they’ve been working on him from the outside with November and his alliance with Echo is going to be really tested, because he’s going to be in there with her partially to protect her but also to find out what’s really going on. You know you can gaze into the abyss or you can actually live in it, it’s going to affect you. so we are going to see that while (Echo) is starting to grow, we’re going to see that everybody else really starting to come apart a little bit.”</p>
<p>“Dollhouse” is certainly a kind of abyss — without a doubt, it is the only show on television to so brazenly portray such ethically questionable and morally deep actions and situations. This is not lost on Whedon.</p>
<p>“I think with this show, I want to say to the people who have, you know, felt a connection with me, that maybe you want to back away and avoid eye contact,” he said. “That maybe there’s something horribly wrong with me, and this is my very poetical way of expressing that. I think of it as a work that actually frightens me at times in a way that my shows seldom got to. At the same time I have that sort of jolly love of everything that’s going on and have to be reminded that what I’m doing is reprehensible. So it’s a mature work in the sense that I grew up and went insane.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104856</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104856</guid>
		<description>Season 2 takes place after season 1 / long before Epitagh One and we will be back to &quot;second half of season 1 style&quot; Dr Saunders will only be in 3 episodes due to her commitment to Happy Town, Laurence Dominic is also heavily limited by his schedule, and Mille/November is actually coming back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Season 2 takes place after season 1 / long before Epitagh One and we will be back to &#8220;second half of season 1 style&#8221; Dr Saunders will only be in 3 episodes due to her commitment to Happy Town, Laurence Dominic is also heavily limited by his schedule, and Mille/November is actually coming back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grr_argh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/07/25/drinking-the-dollhouse-epitaph-one-kool-aid-no-spoilers/23569/comment-page-1/#comment-104851</link>
		<dc:creator>grr_argh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=23569#comment-104851</guid>
		<description>just saw Epitaph One a couple hours ago. It was definitely by far the best Dollhouse episode since Stage Fright. This episode was definitely risky in my opinion. They gave away so much so fast. I remember reading that Joss wanted this to work as a series finale if the show ended up being cancelled and thus we have this episode that is just packed with too many spoilers. I can&#039;t imagine season 2 being before Epitaph One&#039;s timeline. It just wouldn&#039;t work because we know how everything would end up in the end. Definitely a risky episode and can&#039;t wait to see how season 2 plays out. Forget about Man on the Street being a game changer for the series, Epitaph One completely throws everything off balance. Can&#039;t wait to see what&#039;s in store!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just saw Epitaph One a couple hours ago. It was definitely by far the best Dollhouse episode since Stage Fright. This episode was definitely risky in my opinion. They gave away so much so fast. I remember reading that Joss wanted this to work as a series finale if the show ended up being cancelled and thus we have this episode that is just packed with too many spoilers. I can&#8217;t imagine season 2 being before Epitaph One&#8217;s timeline. It just wouldn&#8217;t work because we know how everything would end up in the end. Definitely a risky episode and can&#8217;t wait to see how season 2 plays out. Forget about Man on the Street being a game changer for the series, Epitaph One completely throws everything off balance. Can&#8217;t wait to see what&#8217;s in store!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

