<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings:   Dollhouse dips to a new series low; Medium night&#039;s strongest show on a slow Friday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recaps: Dollhouse Season 2, Episodes 1 and 2 - Film School Rejects</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-136377</link>
		<dc:creator>Recaps: Dollhouse Season 2, Episodes 1 and 2 - Film School Rejects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-136377</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest of the episode really lets the overall production down. Add to that a slip in the ratings (TVByTheNumbers puts Dollhouse&#8217;s ratings at 2.09 million and 0.8/3) to bring the numbers to an all-series low [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest of the episode really lets the overall production down. Add to that a slip in the ratings (TVByTheNumbers puts Dollhouse&#8217;s ratings at 2.09 million and 0.8/3) to bring the numbers to an all-series low [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonlightAngel</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-134497</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonlightAngel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-134497</guid>
		<description>In light of these Friday night ratings, I guess Moonlight&#039;s ratings and its still faithful fans are looking pretty good to CBS right now, especially in the light of the growing vamp craze and the disappointing numbers for Three Rivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of these Friday night ratings, I guess Moonlight&#8217;s ratings and its still faithful fans are looking pretty good to CBS right now, especially in the light of the growing vamp craze and the disappointing numbers for Three Rivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XFEver</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-134058</link>
		<dc:creator>XFEver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-134058</guid>
		<description>&quot;I really wanted to know how the cliffhanger got resolved! But unlike–oh, say, some Dollhouse fans just for example–I never went around calling people unintelligent for not being able to “get” Farscape.&quot;

That&#039;s so true.

I&#039;d seen two eps of Firefly and had been unimpressed by it, so stopped watching.

I only got to loathing it when the Browncoats started invading general science fiction boards blasting other people for being &#039;too stupid&#039; to appreciate Fillion&#039;s terrible Han Solo rip-off, Glau&#039;s impersonation of a rock, and Whedon&#039;s terrible world-building.

Whedon&#039;s DH has a lot of holes in it, and yet it has a mostly good cast, and is more mature than anything he&#039;s done bar Angel.  Yes there are problems with Ballard and the overall concept.  Yes, it&#039;s over-rated because of Whedon&#039;s involvement.

But preferable to Ugly Betty, CSI, Cold Case, Lie To Me to name but four ratings winners (in comparison to DH)?  Hell yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I really wanted to know how the cliffhanger got resolved! But unlike–oh, say, some Dollhouse fans just for example–I never went around calling people unintelligent for not being able to “get” Farscape.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s so true.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d seen two eps of Firefly and had been unimpressed by it, so stopped watching.</p>
<p>I only got to loathing it when the Browncoats started invading general science fiction boards blasting other people for being &#8216;too stupid&#8217; to appreciate Fillion&#8217;s terrible Han Solo rip-off, Glau&#8217;s impersonation of a rock, and Whedon&#8217;s terrible world-building.</p>
<p>Whedon&#8217;s DH has a lot of holes in it, and yet it has a mostly good cast, and is more mature than anything he&#8217;s done bar Angel.  Yes there are problems with Ballard and the overall concept.  Yes, it&#8217;s over-rated because of Whedon&#8217;s involvement.</p>
<p>But preferable to Ugly Betty, CSI, Cold Case, Lie To Me to name but four ratings winners (in comparison to DH)?  Hell yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133550</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133550</guid>
		<description>Victor says: &quot;I hate FOX for putting out shows that eventually get cancelled. I will never watch Fox again!!!&quot;

I hate to be the one to break this to you, but all shows eventually get cancelled. (Or were you joking.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victor says: &#8220;I hate FOX for putting out shows that eventually get cancelled. I will never watch Fox again!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>I hate to be the one to break this to you, but all shows eventually get cancelled. (Or were you joking.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lainey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133545</link>
		<dc:creator>lainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133545</guid>
		<description>In retrospect Dishku probably should have gone with the Buffy spinoff where she would have starred as her Buffy character, Faith.  She didn&#039;t want to, basically, have to follow in Sarah Michelle Gellar&#039;s footsteps, at the time, because her performance would have been compared to Gellar. If she had done the spinoff, it would have been at a time when Buffy fans would have followed the show as a continuation of that series, and the Angel series was still on, and she probably could have had a pantheon of the Buffy alumni to come in and give her support in, what was at that time, the ongoing saga of the Buffyverse on broadcast tv. 

Obviously, there&#039;s never any guarantee, but she would have started out with a couple of aces instead of the deck stacked against her. Sadly, it looks like J. Whedon thought he could do what he wanted to do four or five years ago, except with a different property, and it just hasn&#039;t worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In retrospect Dishku probably should have gone with the Buffy spinoff where she would have starred as her Buffy character, Faith.  She didn&#8217;t want to, basically, have to follow in Sarah Michelle Gellar&#8217;s footsteps, at the time, because her performance would have been compared to Gellar. If she had done the spinoff, it would have been at a time when Buffy fans would have followed the show as a continuation of that series, and the Angel series was still on, and she probably could have had a pantheon of the Buffy alumni to come in and give her support in, what was at that time, the ongoing saga of the Buffyverse on broadcast tv. </p>
<p>Obviously, there&#8217;s never any guarantee, but she would have started out with a couple of aces instead of the deck stacked against her. Sadly, it looks like J. Whedon thought he could do what he wanted to do four or five years ago, except with a different property, and it just hasn&#8217;t worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133457</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen an episode of DH and honestly have no idea who Joss Whedon is, nor do I care, but I hope this show survives because who doesn&#039;t like a happy ending?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen an episode of DH and honestly have no idea who Joss Whedon is, nor do I care, but I hope this show survives because who doesn&#8217;t like a happy ending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffywrestling</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133431</link>
		<dc:creator>buffywrestling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133431</guid>
		<description>Mark: AO specifically said &quot;this site&quot;. Posting a comment from a fan site devoted to the subject is not exactly a generalized view on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: AO specifically said &#8220;this site&#8221;. Posting a comment from a fan site devoted to the subject is not exactly a generalized view on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133348</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133348</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what FOX deserves for letting go of T:SCC. It is sad that even the creator of this show said he would have chosen Terminator over his own show. That means he doesn&#039;t even believe in his show. I know how dollhouse fans feel, and I feel for you guys. I tried getting into Dollhouse, but wasn&#039;t impressed. Hopefully the hardcore fans of Dollhouse won&#039;t be let down like us T:SCC were. I hate FOX for putting out shows that eventually get cancelled. I will never watch Fox again!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what FOX deserves for letting go of T:SCC. It is sad that even the creator of this show said he would have chosen Terminator over his own show. That means he doesn&#8217;t even believe in his show. I know how dollhouse fans feel, and I feel for you guys. I tried getting into Dollhouse, but wasn&#8217;t impressed. Hopefully the hardcore fans of Dollhouse won&#8217;t be let down like us T:SCC were. I hate FOX for putting out shows that eventually get cancelled. I will never watch Fox again!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-18/#comment-133340</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133340</guid>
		<description>AO,
This was posted on Whedonesque today. I didn&#039;t have to dig through the archives looking for it.

&quot;Your average television isn&#039;t about quality. It&#039;s about the cheap. It&#039;s about the &quot;football and beer&quot; tastes of the great unwashed masses. Since TV executives are focused on the lowest common denominator in order to maximize eyeballage, I&#039;m not sure how much longer Dollhouse will live.&quot;

I&#039;ve read dozens of others like it, and this one was mild compared to some others. But the sentiment is the same. I&#039;m not saying that all Whedon fans are elitists. But enough of them are to create a backlash out there. Whedon fans often wonder about the vitriol they sometimes see directed at Dollhouse or other Whedon projects. I think the vitriol is actually directed not at Joss Whedon, who seems a pleasant enough person, but at his fanbase. Anyone who has looked at any thread on any messageboard about any Joss Whedon show is well acquainted with the whole &quot;Joss is a genius/therefore his work is genius/therefore if you don&#039;t like his work you just aren&#039;t smart enough to appreciate it&quot; mindset. It&#039;s out there, and it&#039;s not hard to find. At Whedonesque I&#039;m practically tripping over it. And frankly, I think it alienates potential viewers and does Joss Whedon a disservice. I certainly won&#039;t ever be trying Firefly, and for that you can thank the fans who pestered us all about it endlessly. Not trying to flame Whedon by the way. As I mentioned, I&#039;m  fan of Buffy and Angel, I&#039;ve got all the DVD&#039;s. Paid good money for them. I just wish more of his fans could understand that it&#039;s possible not to like Whedon&#039;s shows and still be intelligent. I think Dollhouse is an ill-conceived mess, and I don&#039;t consider myself stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AO,<br />
This was posted on Whedonesque today. I didn&#8217;t have to dig through the archives looking for it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Your average television isn&#8217;t about quality. It&#8217;s about the cheap. It&#8217;s about the &#8220;football and beer&#8221; tastes of the great unwashed masses. Since TV executives are focused on the lowest common denominator in order to maximize eyeballage, I&#8217;m not sure how much longer Dollhouse will live.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read dozens of others like it, and this one was mild compared to some others. But the sentiment is the same. I&#8217;m not saying that all Whedon fans are elitists. But enough of them are to create a backlash out there. Whedon fans often wonder about the vitriol they sometimes see directed at Dollhouse or other Whedon projects. I think the vitriol is actually directed not at Joss Whedon, who seems a pleasant enough person, but at his fanbase. Anyone who has looked at any thread on any messageboard about any Joss Whedon show is well acquainted with the whole &#8220;Joss is a genius/therefore his work is genius/therefore if you don&#8217;t like his work you just aren&#8217;t smart enough to appreciate it&#8221; mindset. It&#8217;s out there, and it&#8217;s not hard to find. At Whedonesque I&#8217;m practically tripping over it. And frankly, I think it alienates potential viewers and does Joss Whedon a disservice. I certainly won&#8217;t ever be trying Firefly, and for that you can thank the fans who pestered us all about it endlessly. Not trying to flame Whedon by the way. As I mentioned, I&#8217;m  fan of Buffy and Angel, I&#8217;ve got all the DVD&#8217;s. Paid good money for them. I just wish more of his fans could understand that it&#8217;s possible not to like Whedon&#8217;s shows and still be intelligent. I think Dollhouse is an ill-conceived mess, and I don&#8217;t consider myself stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-133159</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133159</guid>
		<description>Maurissa Tancharoen, writer for Dollhouse, confirms my original post.  Whew!  

-----------------
2 eps Jed and I are really happy with - &quot;Epitaph One&quot; and &quot;Belonging&quot;. We hope, at the very least, you get to see the latter on TV.
----------------
http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen

&quot;Belonging&quot; was scheduled for the 23rd.  So this episode, on Oct. 9, is make or break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurissa Tancharoen, writer for Dollhouse, confirms my original post.  Whew!  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
2 eps Jed and I are really happy with &#8211; &#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; and &#8220;Belonging&#8221;. We hope, at the very least, you get to see the latter on TV.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Belonging&#8221; was scheduled for the 23rd.  So this episode, on Oct. 9, is make or break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-133059</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-133059</guid>
		<description>Since writers and those are now posting &quot;save dollhouse&quot; campaigns, I assume if they didn&#039;t all know yesterday, they know today.

http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen/status/4658049763

http://twitter.com/Dichenlachman/status/4659725433</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since writers and those are now posting &#8220;save dollhouse&#8221; campaigns, I assume if they didn&#8217;t all know yesterday, they know today.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen/status/4658049763" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/MoTancharoen/status/4658049763</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Dichenlachman/status/4659725433" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Dichenlachman/status/4659725433</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AO</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132738</link>
		<dc:creator>AO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132738</guid>
		<description>@ mark,

That&#039;s your opinion of the Dollhouse fanbase and you&#039;re entitled to it, but I have not seen widespread evidence of DH fans calling people unintelligent and being insulting.  There are of course a few bad apples amidst any group of fans, but in my time reading the comments at this site then the vast majority of the rude comments have been directed at DH and it&#039;s viewers, not supplied by them.  

There are those people who like to post little more than &quot;Dullhouse sux&quot;, &quot;Fox sux&quot;, &quot;Whedon sux&quot;, etc ad nauseum.  There are those who want it canceled for no discernible reason, those who want it canceled because they personally don&#039;t like the show, those who want it canceled because they hate Fox and those who want it canceled strictly based on it&#039;s poor numbers.  Finally there are the T:SCC fans who want it canceled, usually because they are harboring a great deal of anger and/or hate, wrongly blame Dollhouse for Terminator&#039;s cancelation and feel better when they can be rude and hateful towards others.  While some of those contributers are able to voice their opinions in a manner that does not include a personal attack against the show and it&#039;s fans, most are not.  

Considering the multitude of derogatory comments that are directed at Dollhouse and it&#039;s fans then I find it strange that you can only find fault with Dollhouse&#039;s supporters.  If you have a pre-determined agenda then obviously you have already made up your mind about this, but if not, then I&#039;d ask that you to try to read ALL of the comments and keep track of how how often Dollhouse fans actually are rude for no reason vs how often non-Dollhouse fans are rude to Dollhouse for no reason.  If you do so, I firmly believe that you will be quite surprised by the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mark,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s your opinion of the Dollhouse fanbase and you&#8217;re entitled to it, but I have not seen widespread evidence of DH fans calling people unintelligent and being insulting.  There are of course a few bad apples amidst any group of fans, but in my time reading the comments at this site then the vast majority of the rude comments have been directed at DH and it&#8217;s viewers, not supplied by them.  </p>
<p>There are those people who like to post little more than &#8220;Dullhouse sux&#8221;, &#8220;Fox sux&#8221;, &#8220;Whedon sux&#8221;, etc ad nauseum.  There are those who want it canceled for no discernible reason, those who want it canceled because they personally don&#8217;t like the show, those who want it canceled because they hate Fox and those who want it canceled strictly based on it&#8217;s poor numbers.  Finally there are the T:SCC fans who want it canceled, usually because they are harboring a great deal of anger and/or hate, wrongly blame Dollhouse for Terminator&#8217;s cancelation and feel better when they can be rude and hateful towards others.  While some of those contributers are able to voice their opinions in a manner that does not include a personal attack against the show and it&#8217;s fans, most are not.  </p>
<p>Considering the multitude of derogatory comments that are directed at Dollhouse and it&#8217;s fans then I find it strange that you can only find fault with Dollhouse&#8217;s supporters.  If you have a pre-determined agenda then obviously you have already made up your mind about this, but if not, then I&#8217;d ask that you to try to read ALL of the comments and keep track of how how often Dollhouse fans actually are rude for no reason vs how often non-Dollhouse fans are rude to Dollhouse for no reason.  If you do so, I firmly believe that you will be quite surprised by the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedtolovecoco</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132721</link>
		<dc:creator>usedtolovecoco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132721</guid>
		<description>Everyone says Dollhouse got no promotion, but I remember seeing ads for it in the weeks before the season premiere, and I hardly ever watch TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone says Dollhouse got no promotion, but I remember seeing ads for it in the weeks before the season premiere, and I hardly ever watch TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wess</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132537</link>
		<dc:creator>Wess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132537</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse does not have a big enough fanbase to do anything. Just look at the season 1 DVD sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse does not have a big enough fanbase to do anything. Just look at the season 1 DVD sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132533</guid>
		<description>Julia - Maybe October 9th then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia &#8211; Maybe October 9th then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132502</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132502</guid>
		<description>Poor Eliza, it&#039;s Tru Calling all over again for her. The second season of the show only had 6 episodes ending with no resolution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Eliza, it&#8217;s Tru Calling all over again for her. The second season of the show only had 6 episodes ending with no resolution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132493</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132493</guid>
		<description>Regarding Save Our Show campaigns, and Dollhouse:

Save Our Show campaigns can be deeply annoying. And though I admire a lot of Joss Whedon&#039;s work, his fans can sometimes be...overbearing. But not all Save Our Show campaigns are naive vanity exercises that serve as joke fodder in network studio production offices. The Save Farscape campiagn actually did achieve a concrete result--a miniseries that wrapped up the cliffhanger the TV series ended on. And, yes, I contributed $25. I really wanted to know how the cliffhanger got resolved! But unlike--oh, say, some Dollhouse fans just for example--I never went around calling people unintelligent for not being able to &quot;get&quot; Farscape.

One important negative regarding Save Our Show campaigns is that they can get obnoxious quickly. The Save Farscape campaign, though it achieved a measure of success, did have a few bad apples who got obnoxious. So, just putting some friendly advice out there for the Dollhouse folks: try not to be obnoxious. There are people who will not watch Joss Whedon productions specifically because they encountered an annoying Whedon fan. To this date, even though I have all the Buffy/Angel DVD season sets, I have never given Firefly a chance, because the fandom struck me as obnoxious and condescending. That&#039;s money not going into Joss Whedon&#039;s pocket, from someone who *likes* his work--and it&#039;s all due to his fans going overboard. So play nice, folks.   

Okay, ducking and covering and back to lurking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Save Our Show campaigns, and Dollhouse:</p>
<p>Save Our Show campaigns can be deeply annoying. And though I admire a lot of Joss Whedon&#8217;s work, his fans can sometimes be&#8230;overbearing. But not all Save Our Show campaigns are naive vanity exercises that serve as joke fodder in network studio production offices. The Save Farscape campiagn actually did achieve a concrete result&#8211;a miniseries that wrapped up the cliffhanger the TV series ended on. And, yes, I contributed $25. I really wanted to know how the cliffhanger got resolved! But unlike&#8211;oh, say, some Dollhouse fans just for example&#8211;I never went around calling people unintelligent for not being able to &#8220;get&#8221; Farscape.</p>
<p>One important negative regarding Save Our Show campaigns is that they can get obnoxious quickly. The Save Farscape campaign, though it achieved a measure of success, did have a few bad apples who got obnoxious. So, just putting some friendly advice out there for the Dollhouse folks: try not to be obnoxious. There are people who will not watch Joss Whedon productions specifically because they encountered an annoying Whedon fan. To this date, even though I have all the Buffy/Angel DVD season sets, I have never given Firefly a chance, because the fandom struck me as obnoxious and condescending. That&#8217;s money not going into Joss Whedon&#8217;s pocket, from someone who *likes* his work&#8211;and it&#8217;s all due to his fans going overboard. So play nice, folks.   </p>
<p>Okay, ducking and covering and back to lurking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132461</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132461</guid>
		<description>Seems like it may be gone after October 9th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it may be gone after October 9th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132460</guid>
		<description>So its possible the series may be gone after October 23. FOX really shouldnt have renewed this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So its possible the series may be gone after October 23. FOX really shouldnt have renewed this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132453</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132453</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m going to enjoy this &quot;Save Dollhouse&quot; campaign. It&#039;s already committed one of the classic fan miscues.

Rights infringement:

http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_mediumrectangle.jpg

http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_squarelarge.jpg

Is FOX (or anyone else holding the rights to market those actresses likeness) going to come storming into your home with a C&amp;D? Eh, probably not.

Did you create any goodwill with those with the actual &quot;saving&quot; ability that you would want from &quot;Save Dollhouse&quot; campaign? Eh, probably not.

I have to give some credit to the &quot;Save TSCC&quot; campaign. Sure, it was a naive effort (as all &quot;Save This Show&quot; campaigns are), but you know that silly rolling billboard?

Totally free of rights infringements.

Save the &quot;I&#039;m doing it for the show&quot; counter-argument. If you truly respected the show, you would respect rights associated with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m going to enjoy this &#8220;Save Dollhouse&#8221; campaign. It&#8217;s already committed one of the classic fan miscues.</p>
<p>Rights infringement:</p>
<p><a href="http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_mediumrectangle.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_mediumrectangle.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_squarelarge.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://anyarose.net/googlebanner_squarelarge.jpg</a></p>
<p>Is FOX (or anyone else holding the rights to market those actresses likeness) going to come storming into your home with a C&amp;D? Eh, probably not.</p>
<p>Did you create any goodwill with those with the actual &#8220;saving&#8221; ability that you would want from &#8220;Save Dollhouse&#8221; campaign? Eh, probably not.</p>
<p>I have to give some credit to the &#8220;Save TSCC&#8221; campaign. Sure, it was a naive effort (as all &#8220;Save This Show&#8221; campaigns are), but you know that silly rolling billboard?</p>
<p>Totally free of rights infringements.</p>
<p>Save the &#8220;I&#8217;m doing it for the show&#8221; counter-argument. If you truly respected the show, you would respect rights associated with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132450</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132450</guid>
		<description>the multi-talented Maurissa Tancharoen (and wife of Jed Whedon) posted a support Dollhouse tweet via &quot;Twibbons&quot;

http://twibbon.com/join/Dollhouse-4 

I&#039;m normally not a &quot;save our show&quot; kind of guy, but I say we all do it on JBF&#039;s behalf!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the multi-talented Maurissa Tancharoen (and wife of Jed Whedon) posted a support Dollhouse tweet via &#8220;Twibbons&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twibbon.com/join/Dollhouse-4" rel="nofollow">http://twibbon.com/join/Dollhouse-4</a> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m normally not a &#8220;save our show&#8221; kind of guy, but I say we all do it on JBF&#8217;s behalf!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gossi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132443</link>
		<dc:creator>gossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132443</guid>
		<description>Chris - were the writers in this meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; were the writers in this meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132436</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132436</guid>
		<description>God, I can&#039;t say who I am (publically) but here&#039;s what I know and I will stand by this and bet money it will be confirmed:

There was a meeting today in which staff were basically told ratings need to go UP in order to get a hold and come back on the 23rd, stay the same and they&#039;d consider.. though likely haitus, and if it goes down, it&#039;s out.

Advertisers were basically told that as far as month-by-month ad-buy ins for the network Fox&#039;s schedule has some changes in it, including Fox being TBA for Friday nights after the 23rd.

Fox is concerned that the problem with Dollhouse isn&#039;t fixable, and that they believe that they might have better options Friday night.

That includes a lot of talk about rotating &quot;Glee&quot; to a repeat on Friday night to give it a double-viewing for a while to pickup steam in a show it really believes in, and that it sees as a potential money train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I can&#8217;t say who I am (publically) but here&#8217;s what I know and I will stand by this and bet money it will be confirmed:</p>
<p>There was a meeting today in which staff were basically told ratings need to go UP in order to get a hold and come back on the 23rd, stay the same and they&#8217;d consider.. though likely haitus, and if it goes down, it&#8217;s out.</p>
<p>Advertisers were basically told that as far as month-by-month ad-buy ins for the network Fox&#8217;s schedule has some changes in it, including Fox being TBA for Friday nights after the 23rd.</p>
<p>Fox is concerned that the problem with Dollhouse isn&#8217;t fixable, and that they believe that they might have better options Friday night.</p>
<p>That includes a lot of talk about rotating &#8220;Glee&#8221; to a repeat on Friday night to give it a double-viewing for a while to pickup steam in a show it really believes in, and that it sees as a potential money train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132415</guid>
		<description>Robert - We all had a glimmer of a 13 episode pickup. I personally belived Dollhouse would be axed but that 1% chance of it getting renewed, actually worked here. Now that it got renewed, did I ever think it would survive through this season, not a chance. I knew the series would be axed, just not pulled after 3 eps. FOX should have never renewed Dollhouse and just aired Kitchen Nightmares in the slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; We all had a glimmer of a 13 episode pickup. I personally belived Dollhouse would be axed but that 1% chance of it getting renewed, actually worked here. Now that it got renewed, did I ever think it would survive through this season, not a chance. I knew the series would be axed, just not pulled after 3 eps. FOX should have never renewed Dollhouse and just aired Kitchen Nightmares in the slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132411</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132411</guid>
		<description>Dan, it&#039;s definitely official that Dollhouse won&#039;t air on 10/16 and that has nothing to do with the ratings.  The first game of the ALCS (MLB American League Championship Series) is scheduled for that night on FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, it&#8217;s definitely official that Dollhouse won&#8217;t air on 10/16 and that has nothing to do with the ratings.  The first game of the ALCS (MLB American League Championship Series) is scheduled for that night on FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132407</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132407</guid>
		<description>P.S. while i have no idea who Chris is, Chris gets some &quot;psychic&quot; points!  Chris accurately called the 13 episode S2 pickup on March 14, 2009!
--
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/14/friday-ratings-ghost-whisperer-wins-tscc-and-dollhouse-higher/14540#comment-59397</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. while i have no idea who Chris is, Chris gets some &#8220;psychic&#8221; points!  Chris accurately called the 13 episode S2 pickup on March 14, 2009!<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/14/friday-ratings-ghost-whisperer-wins-tscc-and-dollhouse-higher/14540#comment-59397" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/14/friday-ratings-ghost-whisperer-wins-tscc-and-dollhouse-higher/14540#comment-59397</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132406</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132406</guid>
		<description>Theres already a few fan sites that mention the series as in serious danger of being yanked after October 9, but nothing official from FOX yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres already a few fan sites that mention the series as in serious danger of being yanked after October 9, but nothing official from FOX yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132380</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132380</guid>
		<description>Chris, all I saw on twitter was Mo T. saying &quot;work should be interesting tomorrow&quot; yesterday.  not enough for us to do a &quot;Dollhouse pulled from schedule?&quot; post.  I  am hearing (second hand) similar things to what you&#039;ve heard, but nothing yet from FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, all I saw on twitter was Mo T. saying &#8220;work should be interesting tomorrow&#8221; yesterday.  not enough for us to do a &#8220;Dollhouse pulled from schedule?&#8221; post.  I  am hearing (second hand) similar things to what you&#8217;ve heard, but nothing yet from FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132373</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132373</guid>
		<description>Expect writers to talk on twitter soon.. several eluded to it this morning, meeting this afternoon; fridays are now TBA after the 16th right now ;(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect writers to talk on twitter soon.. several eluded to it this morning, meeting this afternoon; fridays are now TBA after the 16th right now ;(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132372</guid>
		<description>Boris, I prefer my Friday night TV watching by semaphore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boris, I prefer my Friday night TV watching by semaphore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132369</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132369</guid>
		<description>What &quot;non traditional means&quot; are left after streaming, downloading, and recording?  Radio telegraphy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;non traditional means&#8221; are left after streaming, downloading, and recording?  Radio telegraphy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-17/#comment-132366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132366</guid>
		<description>Ah, Sycore, we missed you. I see you&#039;re back with the completely unverifiable &quot;Shows aimed at the 18-24 demo are underrepresented, when most of their viewers watch TV online, downloading, DVR or by non traditional means.&quot;

And as always for others who might be open to understanding, these ratings already include DVR viewing until 3am the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Sycore, we missed you. I see you&#8217;re back with the completely unverifiable &#8220;Shows aimed at the 18-24 demo are underrepresented, when most of their viewers watch TV online, downloading, DVR or by non traditional means.&#8221;</p>
<p>And as always for others who might be open to understanding, these ratings already include DVR viewing until 3am the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sycore</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-132353</link>
		<dc:creator>Sycore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132353</guid>
		<description>You are witnessing the death of live Nielsen broadcast TV numbers on Friday night. They are absolutely meaningless. Live +7 numbers are a little clearer of what people are watching, but still do no represent what people are truly watching. Shows aimed at the 18-24 demo are underrepresented, when most of their viewers watch TV online, downloading, DVR or by non traditional means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are witnessing the death of live Nielsen broadcast TV numbers on Friday night. They are absolutely meaningless. Live +7 numbers are a little clearer of what people are watching, but still do no represent what people are truly watching. Shows aimed at the 18-24 demo are underrepresented, when most of their viewers watch TV online, downloading, DVR or by non traditional means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-132333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132333</guid>
		<description>Chris, got anything I can post on the site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, got anything I can post on the site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-132325</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132325</guid>
		<description>Memo is out.. Dollhouse is getting yanked, and will be replaced by repeats followed by gameshows after 3rd ep.. this week will be it&#039;s last, a planned break on Oct. 16, and it will not return.  Sorry fans, I&#039;ve been rooting for it as hard as anyone here.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memo is out.. Dollhouse is getting yanked, and will be replaced by repeats followed by gameshows after 3rd ep.. this week will be it&#8217;s last, a planned break on Oct. 16, and it will not return.  Sorry fans, I&#8217;ve been rooting for it as hard as anyone here.  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollhouse Italia » Dollhouse in pericolo di cancellazione!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-132216</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollhouse Italia » Dollhouse in pericolo di cancellazione!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132216</guid>
		<description>[...] andati in onda in America, già vi è motivo di temere il peggio per Dollhouse. Come registrato da Tv by the Numbers , infatti, gli ascolti dell&#8217;ultima puntata andata in onda, &#8220;Instinct&#8221;, sono stati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] andati in onda in America, già vi è motivo di temere il peggio per Dollhouse. Come registrato da Tv by the Numbers , infatti, gli ascolti dell&#8217;ultima puntata andata in onda, &#8220;Instinct&#8221;, sono stati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autumn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-132016</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-132016</guid>
		<description>When do the Smallville numbers get updated? I would love to know how much lower the ratings will get! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do the Smallville numbers get updated? I would love to know how much lower the ratings will get! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131884</guid>
		<description>I believe they will be shown, whether it be burned off until December, or next summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe they will be shown, whether it be burned off until December, or next summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131882</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131882</guid>
		<description>Hopefully all the 13 DOLLHOUSE 2nd season episodes will be shown - 26 episodes for any show is a pretty good run. But, if they&#039;re pulled, then Blu-ray is just as good. A 3rd season seems out of the question at this stage so, as a fan of the show, it doesn&#039;t matter too much to me whether it gets cancelled or not. 

But if it DOES get cancelled I can absolutely guarantee that neither me, nor any of my buddies, will EVER watch BROTHERS again. That&#039;ll teach Fox a lesson they&#039;ll never forget!

Quality-wise it&#039;s about on a par with TSCC. DOLLHOUSE has more potential but, with few exceptions, is not fulfilling it. It&#039;s not vintage Whedon but even sub-par Whedon is better than 90% of what&#039;s on Network TV. However good it gets I don&#039;t see the ratings improving significantly - it&#039;s just not a mass-market show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully all the 13 DOLLHOUSE 2nd season episodes will be shown &#8211; 26 episodes for any show is a pretty good run. But, if they&#8217;re pulled, then Blu-ray is just as good. A 3rd season seems out of the question at this stage so, as a fan of the show, it doesn&#8217;t matter too much to me whether it gets cancelled or not. </p>
<p>But if it DOES get cancelled I can absolutely guarantee that neither me, nor any of my buddies, will EVER watch BROTHERS again. That&#8217;ll teach Fox a lesson they&#8217;ll never forget!</p>
<p>Quality-wise it&#8217;s about on a par with TSCC. DOLLHOUSE has more potential but, with few exceptions, is not fulfilling it. It&#8217;s not vintage Whedon but even sub-par Whedon is better than 90% of what&#8217;s on Network TV. However good it gets I don&#8217;t see the ratings improving significantly &#8211; it&#8217;s just not a mass-market show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131873</guid>
		<description>DJ Mike - NBC didnt initially axe Medium. They just wanted a midseason order of 13 eps, while CBS wanted 22. So it was a cost thing since NBC doesnt own the series. Medium has always been a reliable performer at 10pm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ Mike &#8211; NBC didnt initially axe Medium. They just wanted a midseason order of 13 eps, while CBS wanted 22. So it was a cost thing since NBC doesnt own the series. Medium has always been a reliable performer at 10pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Mike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131869</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131869</guid>
		<description>Interesting that a show that was cancelled just a couple of months back(Medium)...is now the number one show on Fridays (demos speaking)...proving again that NBC executives have been making questionable decisions....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that a show that was cancelled just a couple of months back(Medium)&#8230;is now the number one show on Fridays (demos speaking)&#8230;proving again that NBC executives have been making questionable decisions&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Robot</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131858</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131858</guid>
		<description>When a rerun of the forgettable &quot;The Forgotten&quot; doubles up Dullhouse, its time hear the whisper of the axe and it send Dullhouse to the graveyard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a rerun of the forgettable &#8220;The Forgotten&#8221; doubles up Dullhouse, its time hear the whisper of the axe and it send Dullhouse to the graveyard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Robot</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131828</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131828</guid>
		<description>Dullhouse with 2 million viewers is at CW-like levels. Axe the thing already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dullhouse with 2 million viewers is at CW-like levels. Axe the thing already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porky</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131759</link>
		<dc:creator>porky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131759</guid>
		<description>AO,

I wasn&#039;t asking a literal question and I actually meant to type vs. and not or.

I think complaining about Dollhouse being kept over TSCC is pointless. TSCC fans shouldn&#039;t take it out on Dollhouse or their fans. Whether Dollhouse or TSCC was kept, neither was going to perform well on Fridays. Those saying TSCC should&#039;ve been kept are wrong. It shouldn&#039;t because it did pretty poor as well and cost a lot of money like someone else pointed out. Fox was in a no win situation and they put themselves in that position for Friday night. 

There really is no reason to keep Dollhouse around anymore. That&#039;s not to say fans shouldn&#039;t care about a show they like, but let&#039;s be honest, Dollhouse is getting 2M viewers and .8 in the demos on FOX. That&#039;s pretty pathetic for whatever the reasons are.

I&#039;m not sure what FOX&#039;s plans are for the winter/spring on Friday&#039;s, but maybe reruns of House and Human Target would be something they should do. I know it&#039;s copying ABC with Flashforward, but clearly, Human Target is looking like FOX&#039;s only hope for something different to breakout this year.

I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll do that though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AO,</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t asking a literal question and I actually meant to type vs. and not or.</p>
<p>I think complaining about Dollhouse being kept over TSCC is pointless. TSCC fans shouldn&#8217;t take it out on Dollhouse or their fans. Whether Dollhouse or TSCC was kept, neither was going to perform well on Fridays. Those saying TSCC should&#8217;ve been kept are wrong. It shouldn&#8217;t because it did pretty poor as well and cost a lot of money like someone else pointed out. Fox was in a no win situation and they put themselves in that position for Friday night. </p>
<p>There really is no reason to keep Dollhouse around anymore. That&#8217;s not to say fans shouldn&#8217;t care about a show they like, but let&#8217;s be honest, Dollhouse is getting 2M viewers and .8 in the demos on FOX. That&#8217;s pretty pathetic for whatever the reasons are.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what FOX&#8217;s plans are for the winter/spring on Friday&#8217;s, but maybe reruns of House and Human Target would be something they should do. I know it&#8217;s copying ABC with Flashforward, but clearly, Human Target is looking like FOX&#8217;s only hope for something different to breakout this year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll do that though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There&#8217;s Pretty Much No Saving &#8216;Dollhouse&#8217; Now &#124; GamersCircle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131748</link>
		<dc:creator>There&#8217;s Pretty Much No Saving &#8216;Dollhouse&#8217; Now &#124; GamersCircle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131748</guid>
		<description>[...] come around in year two and find a bigger audience. So far, that hasn&#8217;t happened, and now TV by the Numbers says the future looks really grim for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come around in year two and find a bigger audience. So far, that hasn&#8217;t happened, and now TV by the Numbers says the future looks really grim for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131739</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131739</guid>
		<description>With NBC and ABC likely not axing a series until November-December, and with The CW already have axed a series, my guess is that Three Rivers will be the next show axed.

Cancellation list
The Beautiful Life - September 25, 2009
Three Rivers - Late October
Dollhouse - Early November
Hank - Early November
Eastwick - Late November
The Forgotten - December
Mercy/Trauma - February (All episodes aired, not officially cancelled)

Of anyone can think of any new series likely to be axed any earlier than Three Rivers, share your thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With NBC and ABC likely not axing a series until November-December, and with The CW already have axed a series, my guess is that Three Rivers will be the next show axed.</p>
<p>Cancellation list<br />
The Beautiful Life &#8211; September 25, 2009<br />
Three Rivers &#8211; Late October<br />
Dollhouse &#8211; Early November<br />
Hank &#8211; Early November<br />
Eastwick &#8211; Late November<br />
The Forgotten &#8211; December<br />
Mercy/Trauma &#8211; February (All episodes aired, not officially cancelled)</p>
<p>Of anyone can think of any new series likely to be axed any earlier than Three Rivers, share your thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131735</guid>
		<description>lainey - CBS is probably happy that Medium is holding up and has the same general ratings as Ghost Whisperer and Numb3rs. At least it can air 22 eps in a steady slot. I think all 3 will do better throughout the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lainey &#8211; CBS is probably happy that Medium is holding up and has the same general ratings as Ghost Whisperer and Numb3rs. At least it can air 22 eps in a steady slot. I think all 3 will do better throughout the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131734</guid>
		<description>Red - I dont think CBS would mess with their Friday lineup. All 3 will stay until May. I believe that once Three Rivers is axed, CBS should move the waning Cold Case back to 9 and add Flashpoint to 10. Flashpoint has 9 episodes left so CBS could use them to fill 10pm until midseason where CBS can premiere a new drama. 

AO - I agree with your thoughts. ABC is the most hard to figure out because between now and midseason they make the most changes. Between Castle, Eastwick, and The Forgotten, I think sophomore Castle will get a full year and the other 2 will be axed by December. Judging on the slope of the first 2 airings of Eastwick and Forgotten my thought it numbers can only go down. ABC has so many new dramas for midseason as well as reality series as well as Lost so their schedule is likely to change drastically. My bet is CW keeps Vampire, Melrose and dumps every other new series. CBS is keeping NCIS LA, and likely Good Wife. NBC&#039;s Trauma and Mercy could go either way. Theyre not gonna fo better but if they dont do horrible, both could stick around until Heroes finishes and Chuck, Parenthood and Persons Unknown premiere around March.

Pete5125 - Timm Sharp was added and as a regular and J.B. Smoove was dropped. Lindsey Broad was credited as a guest star however an article from august on the futon critic said that she was upped to series regular so its likely she&#039;ll be in the main credits at the beginning soon. FOX could move the combo to 7:00 sundays, but the problem is that until January, Football always overruns into 7:00. The Brothers Pilot repeat at 7 was higher than the otiginal airing. Id say for FOX leave both on fridays.

Forg - In total, theres 22 fourth season production episodes, 9 third season production episodes, and 1 second season production episode left for Til Death. It doesnt seem like FOX will air these episodes during this season though. I still think FOX should have burned the remaining Season 3 episodes off last summer. I originally thought the Trace/Case deal would turn out like Joan and Judging in May 05. But CBS kept Case and dropped Trace. Now everyone knows that Cold Case will be dropped. If that series was barely saved last season and now performs badly this year, why would CBS keep it? Numb3rs has a better chance though and I&#039;m sticking by it until May. 

Here&#039;s the history of Til Death
Season 1 - 22 episodes produced, all 22 aired
Season 2 - 19 episodes produced, 15 aired
Season 3 - 13 episodes produced, 7 aired; 3 of which were from season 2 and 4 from Season 3

That leaves 10 leftovers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red &#8211; I dont think CBS would mess with their Friday lineup. All 3 will stay until May. I believe that once Three Rivers is axed, CBS should move the waning Cold Case back to 9 and add Flashpoint to 10. Flashpoint has 9 episodes left so CBS could use them to fill 10pm until midseason where CBS can premiere a new drama. </p>
<p>AO &#8211; I agree with your thoughts. ABC is the most hard to figure out because between now and midseason they make the most changes. Between Castle, Eastwick, and The Forgotten, I think sophomore Castle will get a full year and the other 2 will be axed by December. Judging on the slope of the first 2 airings of Eastwick and Forgotten my thought it numbers can only go down. ABC has so many new dramas for midseason as well as reality series as well as Lost so their schedule is likely to change drastically. My bet is CW keeps Vampire, Melrose and dumps every other new series. CBS is keeping NCIS LA, and likely Good Wife. NBC&#8217;s Trauma and Mercy could go either way. Theyre not gonna fo better but if they dont do horrible, both could stick around until Heroes finishes and Chuck, Parenthood and Persons Unknown premiere around March.</p>
<p>Pete5125 &#8211; Timm Sharp was added and as a regular and J.B. Smoove was dropped. Lindsey Broad was credited as a guest star however an article from august on the futon critic said that she was upped to series regular so its likely she&#8217;ll be in the main credits at the beginning soon. FOX could move the combo to 7:00 sundays, but the problem is that until January, Football always overruns into 7:00. The Brothers Pilot repeat at 7 was higher than the otiginal airing. Id say for FOX leave both on fridays.</p>
<p>Forg &#8211; In total, theres 22 fourth season production episodes, 9 third season production episodes, and 1 second season production episode left for Til Death. It doesnt seem like FOX will air these episodes during this season though. I still think FOX should have burned the remaining Season 3 episodes off last summer. I originally thought the Trace/Case deal would turn out like Joan and Judging in May 05. But CBS kept Case and dropped Trace. Now everyone knows that Cold Case will be dropped. If that series was barely saved last season and now performs badly this year, why would CBS keep it? Numb3rs has a better chance though and I&#8217;m sticking by it until May. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the history of Til Death<br />
Season 1 &#8211; 22 episodes produced, all 22 aired<br />
Season 2 &#8211; 19 episodes produced, 15 aired<br />
Season 3 &#8211; 13 episodes produced, 7 aired; 3 of which were from season 2 and 4 from Season 3</p>
<p>That leaves 10 leftovers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lainey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131705</link>
		<dc:creator>lainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131705</guid>
		<description>Well, CBS obviously has some incentive concerning Medium, since it already is established. I looked up some stats, and it seems that, according to stats, at the end of its first two seasons, out of all other shows, it was #19 and #35, in that order. Over the next three seasons, it was #61, #41, and last year it went back to #61. The ironic thing is that, if CBS applied the criteria it usually applies to series, it probably would have done the same thing. If Medium was a freshmen series, it probably would be on the way into the great CBS toaster.  

Of course, its early, and since CBS had reason to cut it some slack, maybe it will get back to an acceptable level for the net. My point has been how CBS seems to keep on axing series that, in retrospect, they should have kept. Maybe, since Medium already has a profit margin, with dvds and syndication and low production costs, CBS will give it a long leash to see if it can finally fix the chink in their Friday night &quot;link&quot; of shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, CBS obviously has some incentive concerning Medium, since it already is established. I looked up some stats, and it seems that, according to stats, at the end of its first two seasons, out of all other shows, it was #19 and #35, in that order. Over the next three seasons, it was #61, #41, and last year it went back to #61. The ironic thing is that, if CBS applied the criteria it usually applies to series, it probably would have done the same thing. If Medium was a freshmen series, it probably would be on the way into the great CBS toaster.  </p>
<p>Of course, its early, and since CBS had reason to cut it some slack, maybe it will get back to an acceptable level for the net. My point has been how CBS seems to keep on axing series that, in retrospect, they should have kept. Maybe, since Medium already has a profit margin, with dvds and syndication and low production costs, CBS will give it a long leash to see if it can finally fix the chink in their Friday night &#8220;link&#8221; of shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376/comment-page-16/#comment-131704</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/tv-ratings-dollhouse-dips-to-a-new-series-low/29376#comment-131704</guid>
		<description>Not surprised by Dollhouse&#039;s dismal ratings. The episode was bad in my opinion and it faced head to head competition with the premiere of Stargate Universe, which is another Scifi show. 

However, Dollhouse this year doesn&#039;t have the limited commercials which it did last year that artificially raised its ratings. It can&#039;t get ratings even close to what Terminator got under the same circumstances.

The powers that be just don&#039;t get it in my honest opinion. Quit featuring so much of Eliza Dushku on Dollhouse. She&#039;s killing the show. I like every other character on it with the exception of Ballard (who I consider awful) MUCH, MUCH better than Echo. And I liked Elisha Dushku on Buffy &amp; Angel but I don&#039;t in Dollhouse. The actress who plays Sierra is way better and her character more interesting to me. Victor and Melly are most interesting. Echo/Caroline is a complete bore. 

The bottom line is that Eliza Dushku can&#039;t carry a show. The producers should have realized it after last season and retooled the show and brought on a couple of much stronger actors with name recognition. Instead we get the same dribble.

I also don&#039;t see women ever tuning into a show in droves that features the regular characters getting raped in every episode (literally and figuratively) solely for money. And Ballard&#039;s character has lost any moral character that he once had. 

It was interesting seeing Jamie Bamber with his native English accent in the last episode but I never could stand Alexis Denisof as an actor so his addition to the show is a huge negative to me.

At this point I&#039;d be surprised if they end up showing all 13 episodes and totally shocked if the back 9 are ordered. 

I was expecting that after Alan Tudyk&#039;s strong perforance in the finale that they would try retooling the show over the summer - instead to me it seems that they insist on continuing to push the things that didn&#039;t work last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprised by Dollhouse&#8217;s dismal ratings. The episode was bad in my opinion and it faced head to head competition with the premiere of Stargate Universe, which is another Scifi show. </p>
<p>However, Dollhouse this year doesn&#8217;t have the limited commercials which it did last year that artificially raised its ratings. It can&#8217;t get ratings even close to what Terminator got under the same circumstances.</p>
<p>The powers that be just don&#8217;t get it in my honest opinion. Quit featuring so much of Eliza Dushku on Dollhouse. She&#8217;s killing the show. I like every other character on it with the exception of Ballard (who I consider awful) MUCH, MUCH better than Echo. And I liked Elisha Dushku on Buffy &amp; Angel but I don&#8217;t in Dollhouse. The actress who plays Sierra is way better and her character more interesting to me. Victor and Melly are most interesting. Echo/Caroline is a complete bore. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that Eliza Dushku can&#8217;t carry a show. The producers should have realized it after last season and retooled the show and brought on a couple of much stronger actors with name recognition. Instead we get the same dribble.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see women ever tuning into a show in droves that features the regular characters getting raped in every episode (literally and figuratively) solely for money. And Ballard&#8217;s character has lost any moral character that he once had. </p>
<p>It was interesting seeing Jamie Bamber with his native English accent in the last episode but I never could stand Alexis Denisof as an actor so his addition to the show is a huge negative to me.</p>
<p>At this point I&#8217;d be surprised if they end up showing all 13 episodes and totally shocked if the back 9 are ordered. </p>
<p>I was expecting that after Alan Tudyk&#8217;s strong perforance in the finale that they would try retooling the show over the summer &#8211; instead to me it seems that they insist on continuing to push the things that didn&#8217;t work last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

