Comments on: Stephanopoulos will be primary substitute for Diane Sawyer on "World News"

By: Judy

Judy — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:09:55 +0000

George has primary replacement? Just one more reason not to watch ABC evening news. When you didn’t things could get worse than Charlie (head in the sand) Gibson – ABC brings on Sawyer and George.

ABC let me know when you get serious about unbias reporting.

By: Boris

Boris — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:47:19 +0000

Lacey says:

“I do not like Diane Sawyer. She’s very bias….”

Which way? One normally hears claims of liberal bias in the media, but of course Sawyer was a Nixon insider.

By: kev0170

kev0170 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:51:45 +0000

i think diane sawyer is an awful idea.. but ABC has to deal with what they have its not like they have alot of choices.. for example. NBC has alot of potential talent over there like Ann Curry, Natelie Morales and even Lester Holt to name a few so this wasnt ABC’s best choice but it was reali their only choice

By: Lacey

Lacey — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:31:46 +0000

I do not like Diane Sawyer. She’s very bias and isn’t someone I want to watch everyday. I do, however, like George Stephanopoulos. He’s just an overall better anchor and reporter and I think he should have gotten the full-time position, for World News.

By: Brian

Brian — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0000

mark-allen: no ….. Brian Williams must be one happy man

By: mark-allen

mark-allen — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:31:34 +0000

am i the only one who thinks that diane sawyer is a really, really bad idea?

By: Boris

Boris — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:27:33 +0000

I could go for Rove, but I’d probably just start pining for Carville.

By: Alex

Alex — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:13:17 +0000

I would totally watch Karl Rove as a nightly news anchor…

By: Cody

Cody — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:19:04 +0000

If Karl Rove did the evening news that would be epic

By: James B. Rhoads

James B. Rhoads — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:42:02 +0000

You may like him (I like him), but should we trust anyone who was as deeply involved as he was in any political party to deliver the fair and balanced news? I liked Russert (R.I.P.) as well, but . . . still . . . former partisan shill unworthy and unqualified of offering non-partisan news.

I’m sure everyone for Snuffaluffagus would be just as warm and fuzzy about Karl Rove hosting the evening news. No, they’d have a list of a list of reasons why he was unqualified.

By: The1337

The1337 — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:57:57 +0000

Because George Stephanopoulos is awesome. I don’t care if he was a Clinton castoff. There’s something about him that makes him likable.

By: Nightstar

Nightstar — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:51:32 +0000

And this is supposed to encourage me to watch ABC news programming how?