<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings: Broadcast News Trends Down; Fox, MSNBC, HLN Up; CNN, CNBC Flat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam James</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149464</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149464</guid>
		<description>The numbers cause you to wonder why CBS is taking so long to replace Katie Couric who has been consistently in third place among the broadcast network news shows.  I can&#039;t image any other corporation that would allow that level of financial &#039;bleeding&#039; to continue without making a change.  Could it be that CBS doesn&#039;t know what to do?  If so, why aren&#039;t shareholders forcing a change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers cause you to wonder why CBS is taking so long to replace Katie Couric who has been consistently in third place among the broadcast network news shows.  I can&#8217;t image any other corporation that would allow that level of financial &#8216;bleeding&#8217; to continue without making a change.  Could it be that CBS doesn&#8217;t know what to do?  If so, why aren&#8217;t shareholders forcing a change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149407</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149407</guid>
		<description>FOX needs a Network news to compete with the big 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX needs a Network news to compete with the big 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149360</guid>
		<description>The 3 big broadcast networks are down by about 25-30 percent There will come a time when the cable news guys will pass up broadcast networks.

Even in these numbers, FOX sticks out like a sore thumb on the cable side.  In absolute terms, they have by far the largest viewership (by about 3X) and the largest increase in viewership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3 big broadcast networks are down by about 25-30 percent There will come a time when the cable news guys will pass up broadcast networks.</p>
<p>Even in these numbers, FOX sticks out like a sore thumb on the cable side.  In absolute terms, they have by far the largest viewership (by about 3X) and the largest increase in viewership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedemonhog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149300</link>
		<dc:creator>thedemonhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149300</guid>
		<description>Too many numbers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many numbers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shoey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149157</link>
		<dc:creator>shoey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149157</guid>
		<description>&quot;Note that the two tables aren’t apples to apples. The broadcast chart measures a 30 minute period each night and the cable network chart measures a 6 hour period.&quot;

it&#039;s tough to figure out which has more influence on the public.

FNC or the Networks?

i&#039;m calling it a tie at this point, but FNC&#039;s star is still on it&#039;s way up, the Network&#039;s star is fading.

and Time Marches On!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Note that the two tables aren’t apples to apples. The broadcast chart measures a 30 minute period each night and the cable network chart measures a 6 hour period.&#8221;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s tough to figure out which has more influence on the public.</p>
<p>FNC or the Networks?</p>
<p>i&#8217;m calling it a tie at this point, but FNC&#8217;s star is still on it&#8217;s way up, the Network&#8217;s star is fading.</p>
<p>and Time Marches On!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-149002</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-149002</guid>
		<description>Adam, O’Reilly’s average audience exceeded 5 million on three dates since we began the site in Sept, 2007 through May, 2009 when I stopped my charting: 9/3/08 5.206m, 9/4/08 6.644m and 10/2/08 5.624m.

I don&#039;t have the comparable numbers for Katie Couric on those nights, but O&#039;Reilly could have been higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, O’Reilly’s average audience exceeded 5 million on three dates since we began the site in Sept, 2007 through May, 2009 when I stopped my charting: 9/3/08 5.206m, 9/4/08 6.644m and 10/2/08 5.624m.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have the comparable numbers for Katie Couric on those nights, but O&#8217;Reilly could have been higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-148990</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-148990</guid>
		<description>Bill O&#039;Reilly has made the claim that he has beaten Katie Couric in total viewers on rare occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill O&#8217;Reilly has made the claim that he has beaten Katie Couric in total viewers on rare occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-148918</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-148918</guid>
		<description>Anon, this came directly from TVB, so this is all I have. They update it quarterly and I like it because we get very little time series data like this (for news or anything else).

The fact that number you cite for CNN doesn&#039;t match these may be for a number of reasons. One may be that these cable news numbers are 6-12pm. Your stat may be for another time period like total day, or primetime (8-11p).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, this came directly from TVB, so this is all I have. They update it quarterly and I like it because we get very little time series data like this (for news or anything else).</p>
<p>The fact that number you cite for CNN doesn&#8217;t match these may be for a number of reasons. One may be that these cable news numbers are 6-12pm. Your stat may be for another time period like total day, or primetime (8-11p).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/29/tv-ratings-broadcast-news-trends-down-fox-msnbc-hln-up-cnn-cnbc-flat/32032/comment-page-1/#comment-148906</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32032#comment-148906</guid>
		<description>Just curious, but do you guys get the actual viewer totals, or just this?  Since cable audiences are so small, there can be such a wide range of audience fluctuations (on a percentage basis).  For example, CNN is down 22% in total viewers from 2007....but by looking at this chart, one would assume they&#039;re flat (which technically isn&#039;t true).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, but do you guys get the actual viewer totals, or just this?  Since cable audiences are so small, there can be such a wide range of audience fluctuations (on a percentage basis).  For example, CNN is down 22% in total viewers from 2007&#8230;.but by looking at this chart, one would assume they&#8217;re flat (which technically isn&#8217;t true).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

