<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Travel Channel too expensive for News Corp?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-151221</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-151221</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Ann Coulter Show&quot; Liberals will pee their pants in horror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ann Coulter Show&#8221; Liberals will pee their pants in horror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heradite</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-151108</link>
		<dc:creator>Heradite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-151108</guid>
		<description>@RUKidding:

Oh please. The Ann Coulter Show would blow these all out of the water. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RUKidding:</p>
<p>Oh please. The Ann Coulter Show would blow these all out of the water. </p>
<p> <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Herbaugh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-151015</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Herbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-151015</guid>
		<description>Cody, that&#039;s a good one.  News Corp sold alot of its kids properties with the Family Channel, though.

I could see FX getting a TBS/TNT split, where a new channel gets the sitcoms.

Robert, thanks. &quot;The delivery has exceeded our expectations, and has been greatly expanding over the past year,” indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cody, that&#8217;s a good one.  News Corp sold alot of its kids properties with the Family Channel, though.</p>
<p>I could see FX getting a TBS/TNT split, where a new channel gets the sitcoms.</p>
<p>Robert, thanks. &#8220;The delivery has exceeded our expectations, and has been greatly expanding over the past year,” indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150968</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150968</guid>
		<description>J.R., Soccer Channel up to 27,000 (total day) average in October:

http://www.multichannel.com/article/367028-Fox_Soccer_Nets_Viewer_Gains.php?rssid=20059</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.R., Soccer Channel up to 27,000 (total day) average in October:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/367028-Fox_Soccer_Nets_Viewer_Gains.php?rssid=20059" rel="nofollow">http://www.multichannel.com/article/367028-Fox_Soccer_Nets_Viewer_Gains.php?rssid=20059</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150863</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150863</guid>
		<description>Fox does need a kids channel to compete with the Nick/Disney smackdown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox does need a kids channel to compete with the Nick/Disney smackdown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Herbaugh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150861</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Herbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150861</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s where the Fox Business Channel is headed (never seen it, but it has Imus and Stossel... so far).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s where the Fox Business Channel is headed (never seen it, but it has Imus and Stossel&#8230; so far).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150856</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150856</guid>
		<description>Nat Geo has three channels internationally: NGC, NGC Wild, and NGC Adventure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nat Geo has three channels internationally: NGC, NGC Wild, and NGC Adventure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RUKidding</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150850</link>
		<dc:creator>RUKidding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150850</guid>
		<description>&quot;what kind of programming is left for FOX to try? what kind of programming is left for FOX to try?&quot;

My guess-- another Fox News Channel, FNC2.  The second channel would focus even more on commentary programming. The ratings for O&#039;Reilly, Beck, and Hannity demonstrate the thirst for commentary programming. Shows for Ingraham, Levin, Miller?   Maybe even a big splash with a return to TV for Rush Limbaugh, or &quot;The Sarah Palin Show.&quot;

No, I&#039;m not kidding, I&#039;m merely speculating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what kind of programming is left for FOX to try? what kind of programming is left for FOX to try?&#8221;</p>
<p>My guess&#8211; another Fox News Channel, FNC2.  The second channel would focus even more on commentary programming. The ratings for O&#8217;Reilly, Beck, and Hannity demonstrate the thirst for commentary programming. Shows for Ingraham, Levin, Miller?   Maybe even a big splash with a return to TV for Rush Limbaugh, or &#8220;The Sarah Palin Show.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not kidding, I&#8217;m merely speculating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Herbaugh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/02/travel-channel-too-expensive-for-news-corp/32307/comment-page-1/#comment-150837</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Herbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32307#comment-150837</guid>
		<description>I was wondering that -- the extra households would be great, but what kind of programming is left for FOX to try?  It already decided to flip the Reality channel to another NatGeo, and the Soccer channel averages what, 20,000 viewers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering that &#8212; the extra households would be great, but what kind of programming is left for FOX to try?  It already decided to flip the Reality channel to another NatGeo, and the Soccer channel averages what, 20,000 viewers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

