<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Pundit: &quot;The CW Is On The Edge Of The Cliff&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soni</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-155459</link>
		<dc:creator>Soni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-155459</guid>
		<description>I remember before the CW became the CW (back before the merger between UPN/CBS and The WB). 
Back then, the WB gave us many more genre shows that we (I) enjoyed, and they seemed to be doing hella good. There wasn&#039;t a night I wasn&#039;t watching that channel.
We used to have (coming from the WB): Roswell, Charmed, Angel, Buffy, 7th Heaven, Felicity, Gilmore Girls, Small Ville, Supernatural.

Since the merger in &#039;06, other than Small Ville and Supernatural (and now The Vampire Diaries), what else does the CW have to offer?

They should bring back more genre shows, esp too if Small Ville and Supernatural are to end soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember before the CW became the CW (back before the merger between UPN/CBS and The WB).<br />
Back then, the WB gave us many more genre shows that we (I) enjoyed, and they seemed to be doing hella good. There wasn&#8217;t a night I wasn&#8217;t watching that channel.<br />
We used to have (coming from the WB): Roswell, Charmed, Angel, Buffy, 7th Heaven, Felicity, Gilmore Girls, Small Ville, Supernatural.</p>
<p>Since the merger in &#8217;06, other than Small Ville and Supernatural (and now The Vampire Diaries), what else does the CW have to offer?</p>
<p>They should bring back more genre shows, esp too if Small Ville and Supernatural are to end soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-154484</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-154484</guid>
		<description>Forg - Thats true, CW was choosing between One Tree Hill and Everwood and they made the smart choice of One Tree Hill. Everwood would have been renewed for mondays if 7th Heaven had stayed axed in May 2006. While the series declined, One Tree Hill along with fellow veterans Supernatural and Smallville have been reliable performers. Less reliable CW originals like Gossip Girl and 90210 have done OK but nowhere near how well WB and UPN&#039;s best series have. In fact both CW originals have only done a bit better than some of WB and UPN&#039;s higher rated cancelled series. With CW&#039;s WB veterans declining and their original dramas doing subpar it seems it may actually be the end for CW soon. The Vampire Diaries seemed to emerge as the only hit series for the network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forg &#8211; Thats true, CW was choosing between One Tree Hill and Everwood and they made the smart choice of One Tree Hill. Everwood would have been renewed for mondays if 7th Heaven had stayed axed in May 2006. While the series declined, One Tree Hill along with fellow veterans Supernatural and Smallville have been reliable performers. Less reliable CW originals like Gossip Girl and 90210 have done OK but nowhere near how well WB and UPN&#8217;s best series have. In fact both CW originals have only done a bit better than some of WB and UPN&#8217;s higher rated cancelled series. With CW&#8217;s WB veterans declining and their original dramas doing subpar it seems it may actually be the end for CW soon. The Vampire Diaries seemed to emerge as the only hit series for the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entertainment Link-Off: Turn It Up &#171; The Lowdown Blog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-154475</link>
		<dc:creator>Entertainment Link-Off: Turn It Up &#171; The Lowdown Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-154475</guid>
		<description>[...] other TV related news, could the CW be dead soon? (TV by the Numbers) Probably, but I think Dawn Ostroff will get booted before the network truly goes belly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other TV related news, could the CW be dead soon? (TV by the Numbers) Probably, but I think Dawn Ostroff will get booted before the network truly goes belly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-154448</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-154448</guid>
		<description>&quot;You know, when FOX got football in the mid 90’s that seemed to me to be the “official” moment when the network started to be taken seriously by the masses. Yes, they had hits like the Simpsons, Married With Children, and the X-Files, but when they got football, EVERYONE took notice&quot; 

Exactly. Why doesn&#039;t the CW go that route? I mean it&#039;s not like 18-34 year old women don&#039;t watch sports, they do, probably a lot more of them watch NFL games than CW shows. 

However if the CW were to ever get sports deals it will most likely be college sports that isn&#039;t football or basketball, or soccer, or ice hockey, practically sports that Americans don&#039;t give a damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You know, when FOX got football in the mid 90’s that seemed to me to be the “official” moment when the network started to be taken seriously by the masses. Yes, they had hits like the Simpsons, Married With Children, and the X-Files, but when they got football, EVERYONE took notice&#8221; </p>
<p>Exactly. Why doesn&#8217;t the CW go that route? I mean it&#8217;s not like 18-34 year old women don&#8217;t watch sports, they do, probably a lot more of them watch NFL games than CW shows. </p>
<p>However if the CW were to ever get sports deals it will most likely be college sports that isn&#8217;t football or basketball, or soccer, or ice hockey, practically sports that Americans don&#8217;t give a damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby sheriff</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-154021</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby sheriff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-154021</guid>
		<description>Ostroff should be fired because she ruined all the WB shows with her obsession with anoressic girls.
I miss old school supernatural so much. The episodes with Sam and Dean killing monsters with the occasional girl of the week.
Now with that awful disgusting angel the show sucks like never before, the actor can&#039;t act for sh!t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ostroff should be fired because she ruined all the WB shows with her obsession with anoressic girls.<br />
I miss old school supernatural so much. The episodes with Sam and Dean killing monsters with the occasional girl of the week.<br />
Now with that awful disgusting angel the show sucks like never before, the actor can&#8217;t act for sh!t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleebo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-6/#comment-153925</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153925</guid>
		<description>What still amazes me is that for the most part the CW ratings are less than what either UPN or The WB did on its own.  You would think that since they were two networks around the same level of ratings expectation that they were competing for viewers.  Merging them into one network should have brought more viewers since they didn&#039;t have as many options on network television to choose from.

Im sure that right now given the opportunity to go back in time and un-cancel shows while they were on the WB or UPN they would do so.

Look at some canceled shows as compared to current CW shows by season in millions of viewers

WB
Everwood - 4.8, 4.6, 4.3, 3.6
Angel - 4.8, 4.1, 4.4, 3.7, 4.0, 4.2

UPN
Star Trek Enterprise - 5.9, 3.94, 3.3, 2.81

The CW 
Gossip Girl - 2.6, 2.8, 2.2
90210 - 2.8, 2.4
Melrose Place - 1.61  avg so far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What still amazes me is that for the most part the CW ratings are less than what either UPN or The WB did on its own.  You would think that since they were two networks around the same level of ratings expectation that they were competing for viewers.  Merging them into one network should have brought more viewers since they didn&#8217;t have as many options on network television to choose from.</p>
<p>Im sure that right now given the opportunity to go back in time and un-cancel shows while they were on the WB or UPN they would do so.</p>
<p>Look at some canceled shows as compared to current CW shows by season in millions of viewers</p>
<p>WB<br />
Everwood &#8211; 4.8, 4.6, 4.3, 3.6<br />
Angel &#8211; 4.8, 4.1, 4.4, 3.7, 4.0, 4.2</p>
<p>UPN<br />
Star Trek Enterprise &#8211; 5.9, 3.94, 3.3, 2.81</p>
<p>The CW<br />
Gossip Girl &#8211; 2.6, 2.8, 2.2<br />
90210 &#8211; 2.8, 2.4<br />
Melrose Place &#8211; 1.61  avg so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153885</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153885</guid>
		<description>And R.G. said:

&quot;Why isn’t anyone talking about the CW picking up sports? That’s probably the only obvious solution to their ratings slump.&quot;

You know, when FOX got football in the mid 90&#039;s that seemed to me to be the &quot;official&quot; moment when the network started to be taken seriously by the masses. Yes, they had hits like the Simpsons, Married With Children, and the X-Files, but when they got football, EVERYONE took notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And R.G. said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why isn’t anyone talking about the CW picking up sports? That’s probably the only obvious solution to their ratings slump.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, when FOX got football in the mid 90&#8242;s that seemed to me to be the &#8220;official&#8221; moment when the network started to be taken seriously by the masses. Yes, they had hits like the Simpsons, Married With Children, and the X-Files, but when they got football, EVERYONE took notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153881</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153881</guid>
		<description>Dillan, although I&#039;m not the biggest CW supporter your suggestion that viewers of the CW shows that aren&#039;t SV or SPN are &quot;a highly effeminate gay, bi and/or metrosexual&quot; is very offensive.

Even if a viewer is gay/bi/metrosexual, is there a reason to call them &quot;highly effeminate?&quot;

I&#039;d actually go so far as to suggest The CW leaves gay viewers out as well, and that shows like Buffy, Charmed, and even yes, early Smallville had bigger gay followings than Gossip Girl/90210/Melrose/etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dillan, although I&#8217;m not the biggest CW supporter your suggestion that viewers of the CW shows that aren&#8217;t SV or SPN are &#8220;a highly effeminate gay, bi and/or metrosexual&#8221; is very offensive.</p>
<p>Even if a viewer is gay/bi/metrosexual, is there a reason to call them &#8220;highly effeminate?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d actually go so far as to suggest The CW leaves gay viewers out as well, and that shows like Buffy, Charmed, and even yes, early Smallville had bigger gay followings than Gossip Girl/90210/Melrose/etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153625</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153625</guid>
		<description>R.G: I actually don&#039;t have an idea of what sports they should air since I&#039;m not familiar with that area

Oh yeah I forgot about Supernatural, that&#039;s the last true WB hit and yes One Tree Hill during its last year on The WB was close to cancellation, there were rumors before that CW was choosing between One Tree Hill and Everwood.

Anyway, Smallville, One Tree Hill are aging but CW could not afford to lose them now because they are reliable ratings performer which they need to launch new shows. 

Vampire Diaries is getting good ratings, it got a 2.0 18-49 which is amazing for CW, maybe things will be better for the CW eventually</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.G: I actually don&#8217;t have an idea of what sports they should air since I&#8217;m not familiar with that area</p>
<p>Oh yeah I forgot about Supernatural, that&#8217;s the last true WB hit and yes One Tree Hill during its last year on The WB was close to cancellation, there were rumors before that CW was choosing between One Tree Hill and Everwood.</p>
<p>Anyway, Smallville, One Tree Hill are aging but CW could not afford to lose them now because they are reliable ratings performer which they need to launch new shows. </p>
<p>Vampire Diaries is getting good ratings, it got a 2.0 18-49 which is amazing for CW, maybe things will be better for the CW eventually</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153618</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153618</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t anyone talking about the CW picking up sports? That&#039;s probably the only obvious solution to their ratings slump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t anyone talking about the CW picking up sports? That&#8217;s probably the only obvious solution to their ratings slump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153609</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% TT this is why Life UneXepected might just do that lets hope they give it a proper chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% TT this is why Life UneXepected might just do that lets hope they give it a proper chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153608</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153608</guid>
		<description>The CW should consider focusing on family friendly dramas such as 7th Heaven and Gilmore Girls.  However, it should NOT do re-makes of them.  They need fresh concepts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW should consider focusing on family friendly dramas such as 7th Heaven and Gilmore Girls.  However, it should NOT do re-makes of them.  They need fresh concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153607</guid>
		<description>No Andrew at this point smallville fans are being selfish its been on for like 10 years they should end it with a big bang with a 2 hour series finale most shows can&#039;t even past 2 seasons so need to stop complaining...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Andrew at this point smallville fans are being selfish its been on for like 10 years they should end it with a big bang with a 2 hour series finale most shows can&#8217;t even past 2 seasons so need to stop complaining&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153599</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153599</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement that Smallville can&#039;t last forever, but I think most fans are looking at a potential 10th season to be its last.  It&#039;s a good, even number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement that Smallville can&#8217;t last forever, but I think most fans are looking at a potential 10th season to be its last.  It&#8217;s a good, even number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153595</guid>
		<description>Dawn needs to ditch Smallville, America&#039;s Next Top Model and One tree Hill all of these shows already have a million seasons and are taking up time for new shows that can actually be really good if given a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn needs to ditch Smallville, America&#8217;s Next Top Model and One tree Hill all of these shows already have a million seasons and are taking up time for new shows that can actually be really good if given a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry fans but Smallville needs to end already it jumped the ship already the man doesn&#039;t even fly yet. The show already hit its prime seasons ago and its time for them to create another sci-fi series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry fans but Smallville needs to end already it jumped the ship already the man doesn&#8217;t even fly yet. The show already hit its prime seasons ago and its time for them to create another sci-fi series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153560</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153560</guid>
		<description>This helped Fox in the early 90&#039;s. Perhaps pick up an NFL TV deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This helped Fox in the early 90&#8242;s. Perhaps pick up an NFL TV deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153559</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153559</guid>
		<description>Another thing about CW,Smallville cannot last forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing about CW,Smallville cannot last forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dillan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153480</link>
		<dc:creator>Dillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153480</guid>
		<description>Dan, unless you&#039;re a highly effeminate gay, bi and/or metrosexual, the CW doesn&#039;t give two craps about you.

To Dawn-O, men only serve one purpose in life - intercourse - and it reflects in the majority of the programming and ad campaigns the CW has.

Without a doubt, the only reason Dawn-O hates Smallville so much is because it brings &quot;too many&quot; male viewers, and is keeping her &quot;all-female&quot; network from actually being all-female.

Need proof? How about when the deranged bint cancelled her highest rated series because it didn&#039;t &quot;fit in&quot; with the rest of her schedule? WHAT. THE. HECK. IS. WRONG. WITH. HER???

Seriously, thank God for WBTV. They actually give a crap about Dawn-O destroying the network from the inside. It&#039;s CBS who don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, unless you&#8217;re a highly effeminate gay, bi and/or metrosexual, the CW doesn&#8217;t give two craps about you.</p>
<p>To Dawn-O, men only serve one purpose in life &#8211; intercourse &#8211; and it reflects in the majority of the programming and ad campaigns the CW has.</p>
<p>Without a doubt, the only reason Dawn-O hates Smallville so much is because it brings &#8220;too many&#8221; male viewers, and is keeping her &#8220;all-female&#8221; network from actually being all-female.</p>
<p>Need proof? How about when the deranged bint cancelled her highest rated series because it didn&#8217;t &#8220;fit in&#8221; with the rest of her schedule? WHAT. THE. HECK. IS. WRONG. WITH. HER???</p>
<p>Seriously, thank God for WBTV. They actually give a crap about Dawn-O destroying the network from the inside. It&#8217;s CBS who don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153478</link>
		<dc:creator>Parenthood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153478</guid>
		<description>Rename The CW to The WB, fire Dawn Ostroff and create more shows like Vampire Diaries, Supernatural, Smallville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rename The CW to The WB, fire Dawn Ostroff and create more shows like Vampire Diaries, Supernatural, Smallville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedtolovecoco</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153453</link>
		<dc:creator>usedtolovecoco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153453</guid>
		<description>Targetting young women doesn&#039;t seem like a bad idea. I didn&#039;t know that young women only watch crappy shows with awful writing and acting, though. Learn something new every day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Targetting young women doesn&#8217;t seem like a bad idea. I didn&#8217;t know that young women only watch crappy shows with awful writing and acting, though. Learn something new every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete5125</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153448</link>
		<dc:creator>pete5125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153448</guid>
		<description>CW will still be their, it may become more similar to MyNetwork TV, but it will still be their...CW will not become a cable net, itt cost way to much tolaunch a new net and recieve the clerance that it has now...Thanks to digital TV most people can recieve CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX, CW, 5 different PBS nets, 5 different Religous Channles, My Net TV, Retro TV, MGM TV, etc. w/FCC&#039;s must carrie rule then you would be crazy to start up a cable net when you could just launch a digital net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW will still be their, it may become more similar to MyNetwork TV, but it will still be their&#8230;CW will not become a cable net, itt cost way to much tolaunch a new net and recieve the clerance that it has now&#8230;Thanks to digital TV most people can recieve CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX, CW, 5 different PBS nets, 5 different Religous Channles, My Net TV, Retro TV, MGM TV, etc. w/FCC&#8217;s must carrie rule then you would be crazy to start up a cable net when you could just launch a digital net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aznfratboy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153440</link>
		<dc:creator>aznfratboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153440</guid>
		<description>CW won&#039;t fold, they are getting dangerously close though, they are struggling to pick up new shows, and the old ones are aging. One Tree Hill just doesn&#039;t make anymore sense, Supernatural ends its run after this season, the 90210 franchise is just plain awful, Gossip Girl got old VERY fast and Smallville is into it&#039;s 9th? season. They&#039;ve got nothing left apart from The Vampire Diaries after this season, unless they find a TV show worth watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW won&#8217;t fold, they are getting dangerously close though, they are struggling to pick up new shows, and the old ones are aging. One Tree Hill just doesn&#8217;t make anymore sense, Supernatural ends its run after this season, the 90210 franchise is just plain awful, Gossip Girl got old VERY fast and Smallville is into it&#8217;s 9th? season. They&#8217;ve got nothing left apart from The Vampire Diaries after this season, unless they find a TV show worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153429</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153429</guid>
		<description>Dan, Supernatural is younger than OTH and was far stronger than OTH on WB. OTH wasn&#039;t doing all that great in WB&#039;s last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, Supernatural is younger than OTH and was far stronger than OTH on WB. OTH wasn&#8217;t doing all that great in WB&#8217;s last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153419</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153419</guid>
		<description>Forg - The WB was struggling and they could not find anything strong since One Tree Hill. Series like Summerland, Jack and Bobby, Related, and Just Legal all bombed and the only series that actually did well was Supernatural which is still airing. Even in the comedy department WB was doing badly with Twins, Living With Fran, the aging What I Like About You. WB only had veterans Gilmore Girls, 7th Heaven, Reba, Smallville, and One Tree Hill working out, the first three only aired a season on the CW before being axed. My guess is that the remaining struggling veterans from the WB/UPN combined with The CW&#039;s original dramas s whats bringing the combined network down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forg &#8211; The WB was struggling and they could not find anything strong since One Tree Hill. Series like Summerland, Jack and Bobby, Related, and Just Legal all bombed and the only series that actually did well was Supernatural which is still airing. Even in the comedy department WB was doing badly with Twins, Living With Fran, the aging What I Like About You. WB only had veterans Gilmore Girls, 7th Heaven, Reba, Smallville, and One Tree Hill working out, the first three only aired a season on the CW before being axed. My guess is that the remaining struggling veterans from the WB/UPN combined with The CW&#8217;s original dramas s whats bringing the combined network down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-5/#comment-153415</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153415</guid>
		<description>Also many young women prefer to watch shows like Jon and Kate and even Robot Chicken than anything on the CW. 

Heck even NCIS got more 18-34 year old women watching than any show on the CW combined. 

I think if I were to suggest some original programming for them I&#039;d say they need to make a female version of NCIS if they ever want to succeed, but then again the CW made a rule against making procedurals. 

forg, What sports do you think the CW should air? I&#039;d say either MLS soccer or NCAA basketball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also many young women prefer to watch shows like Jon and Kate and even Robot Chicken than anything on the CW. </p>
<p>Heck even NCIS got more 18-34 year old women watching than any show on the CW combined. </p>
<p>I think if I were to suggest some original programming for them I&#8217;d say they need to make a female version of NCIS if they ever want to succeed, but then again the CW made a rule against making procedurals. </p>
<p>forg, What sports do you think the CW should air? I&#8217;d say either MLS soccer or NCAA basketball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153411</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153411</guid>
		<description>During the last years of WB they were actually struggling and if I remember it right they got beaten by UPN mainly because of the strength of ANTM and Smackdown and WB had a hard time time developing hit shows since One Tree Hill. 

I actually thought the merging UPN and WB was a good idea since I was hoping it would make for a stronger network but well it turned out that they&#039;re even weaker than the two.

The marketing of WB was really good,too bad CW didn&#039;t have that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the last years of WB they were actually struggling and if I remember it right they got beaten by UPN mainly because of the strength of ANTM and Smackdown and WB had a hard time time developing hit shows since One Tree Hill. </p>
<p>I actually thought the merging UPN and WB was a good idea since I was hoping it would make for a stronger network but well it turned out that they&#8217;re even weaker than the two.</p>
<p>The marketing of WB was really good,too bad CW didn&#8217;t have that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153401</guid>
		<description>In theory, I don&#039;t think that it is incorrect to target 18-34, although I think limiting it to just women, is just that, limitiing -- and I don&#039;t think it is incorrect to attempt to &#039;brand&#039; your programming. 
But it needs to work and so far, despite the ballyhoo drummed up over Gossip Girl, Vampire Diaries is the closest the CW has come to succeeding.  
90210 was a failed experiment last season. It was folly to throw good money after bad and go with a Melrose remake. I don&#039;t know what else the CW had to pick from but fergoshsakes -- USA programming is beating them -- these shows weren&#039;t getting shopped around? 
I gotta go with Dawn not being the right exec for this -- I don&#039;t know if anyone from the old WB would have been any better -- but the WB was in better shape than UPN and Dawn came from UPN.  Part of the problem may have been that there wasn&#039;t anything wrong with the brand &#039;WB&#039; and they should have kept it. Maybe the netlets WB &amp; UPN just started to feel the pinch from viewer erosion that ALL broadcast networks have suffered first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, I don&#8217;t think that it is incorrect to target 18-34, although I think limiting it to just women, is just that, limitiing &#8212; and I don&#8217;t think it is incorrect to attempt to &#8216;brand&#8217; your programming.<br />
But it needs to work and so far, despite the ballyhoo drummed up over Gossip Girl, Vampire Diaries is the closest the CW has come to succeeding.<br />
90210 was a failed experiment last season. It was folly to throw good money after bad and go with a Melrose remake. I don&#8217;t know what else the CW had to pick from but fergoshsakes &#8212; USA programming is beating them &#8212; these shows weren&#8217;t getting shopped around?<br />
I gotta go with Dawn not being the right exec for this &#8212; I don&#8217;t know if anyone from the old WB would have been any better &#8212; but the WB was in better shape than UPN and Dawn came from UPN.  Part of the problem may have been that there wasn&#8217;t anything wrong with the brand &#8216;WB&#8217; and they should have kept it. Maybe the netlets WB &amp; UPN just started to feel the pinch from viewer erosion that ALL broadcast networks have suffered first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153398</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153398</guid>
		<description>I miss The WB 

For what is worth, Vampire Diaries is shaping up to be a big hit for The CW, maybe VD could do what 7th Heaven did with The WB.

I agree with R.G, airing sports might help The CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss The WB </p>
<p>For what is worth, Vampire Diaries is shaping up to be a big hit for The CW, maybe VD could do what 7th Heaven did with The WB.</p>
<p>I agree with R.G, airing sports might help The CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153397</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153397</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed the Los Angeles CW affiliate KTLA is no longer including the CW logo on their branding - instead going back to the logo they had as an independent station. And - unless I&#039;m mistaken - KTLA was a flagship for the WB/CW.

I don&#039;t know how profitable cable is vs. a broadcast network, but I think a cable network made up of new programming at night and WB-ish shows during the day would work. If I remember correctly, The WB actually grew a lot of viewers from the fact that they had the Warner Bros.-based cartoons on Saturday mornings, getting viewers that &quot;grew&quot; into the prime time line-up.

I read a really fascinating book called &quot;Season Finale&quot; that talks about the rise and fall of the WB and UPN. It&#039;s like night and day comparing the creativity differences between the networks. The WB also had an expert promo department, miles ahead of anything UPN could or would ever share.

It seems to me that Dawn Ostroff is kept at the CW because she&#039;ll do whatever Moonves tells her. The fact that he can control her is good.

I will say canceling Veronica Mars was a good thing. The show had numerous chances and even repurposing on CBS and MTV and yet it still failed. Creatively, it dropped between seasons, and that FBI thing was atrocious. I will never watch a Rob Thomas-produced show again, so no interest in his new project.

And on that note - thus far, nothing about the CW&#039;s development for next year excites me right now. Then again, I&#039;m male so not in their target demo. I do miss the shows that appealed to both genders - probably why I love Smallville, Supernatural, and the Vampire Diaries more than their other stuff.

Still wish they&#039;d have gone with a Smallville spin-off, too. I can&#039;t believe considering the ratings for &quot;Justice&quot; a few years back they didn&#039;t spin them off right then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the Los Angeles CW affiliate KTLA is no longer including the CW logo on their branding &#8211; instead going back to the logo they had as an independent station. And &#8211; unless I&#8217;m mistaken &#8211; KTLA was a flagship for the WB/CW.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how profitable cable is vs. a broadcast network, but I think a cable network made up of new programming at night and WB-ish shows during the day would work. If I remember correctly, The WB actually grew a lot of viewers from the fact that they had the Warner Bros.-based cartoons on Saturday mornings, getting viewers that &#8220;grew&#8221; into the prime time line-up.</p>
<p>I read a really fascinating book called &#8220;Season Finale&#8221; that talks about the rise and fall of the WB and UPN. It&#8217;s like night and day comparing the creativity differences between the networks. The WB also had an expert promo department, miles ahead of anything UPN could or would ever share.</p>
<p>It seems to me that Dawn Ostroff is kept at the CW because she&#8217;ll do whatever Moonves tells her. The fact that he can control her is good.</p>
<p>I will say canceling Veronica Mars was a good thing. The show had numerous chances and even repurposing on CBS and MTV and yet it still failed. Creatively, it dropped between seasons, and that FBI thing was atrocious. I will never watch a Rob Thomas-produced show again, so no interest in his new project.</p>
<p>And on that note &#8211; thus far, nothing about the CW&#8217;s development for next year excites me right now. Then again, I&#8217;m male so not in their target demo. I do miss the shows that appealed to both genders &#8211; probably why I love Smallville, Supernatural, and the Vampire Diaries more than their other stuff.</p>
<p>Still wish they&#8217;d have gone with a Smallville spin-off, too. I can&#8217;t believe considering the ratings for &#8220;Justice&#8221; a few years back they didn&#8217;t spin them off right then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153372</guid>
		<description>F., good point, I was thinking of writing a post on the term &quot;broadcast network&quot;, now that 90+% of the US population doesn&#039;t get their TV from an over the air broadcast source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F., good point, I was thinking of writing a post on the term &#8220;broadcast network&#8221;, now that 90+% of the US population doesn&#8217;t get their TV from an over the air broadcast source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153369</link>
		<dc:creator>F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153369</guid>
		<description>There is no such thing as broad programming anymore.  Except for sports and annual events, everyone watches what specific type of programming they want.  And now w. DVRs, Hulu, etc. what is a &#039;network&#039; anyway?  Certainly, what is a &quot;broadcast network&quot; anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as broad programming anymore.  Except for sports and annual events, everyone watches what specific type of programming they want.  And now w. DVRs, Hulu, etc. what is a &#8216;network&#8217; anyway?  Certainly, what is a &#8220;broadcast network&#8221; anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayme</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153364</guid>
		<description>From the upcoming schedule, I hope the future is a bit brighter for The CW. By that I mean, I hope Rob (Veronica Mars) Thomas&#039; new show doesn&#039;t get canned before it gets time to breathe.

Dawn always tries to get Thomas it seems, it appears she can tell what&#039;s quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the upcoming schedule, I hope the future is a bit brighter for The CW. By that I mean, I hope Rob (Veronica Mars) Thomas&#8217; new show doesn&#8217;t get canned before it gets time to breathe.</p>
<p>Dawn always tries to get Thomas it seems, it appears she can tell what&#8217;s quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153348</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153348</guid>
		<description>The CW has to stop putting spinoffs from other past shows and be more creative. They should quit making shows about the scandalous lives of rich and spoiled kids. Why is it always about the rich? It gets over the top ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW has to stop putting spinoffs from other past shows and be more creative. They should quit making shows about the scandalous lives of rich and spoiled kids. Why is it always about the rich? It gets over the top ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostrider</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153336</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153336</guid>
		<description>oh for crying outloud people have been crying it&#039;s dimiss for a long time now. if it hasn&#039;t gone out by now it won&#039;t no matter how much people cry and b---h about it. this channel, network still has a couple of more years in it still. every year is the same bs about the network closing down so get over it and enjoy it cause it&#039;ll still be here another couple of more yrs then you can kiss it goodbye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh for crying outloud people have been crying it&#8217;s dimiss for a long time now. if it hasn&#8217;t gone out by now it won&#8217;t no matter how much people cry and b&#8212;h about it. this channel, network still has a couple of more years in it still. every year is the same bs about the network closing down so get over it and enjoy it cause it&#8217;ll still be here another couple of more yrs then you can kiss it goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Williams</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153327</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153327</guid>
		<description>i think Dawn Ostroff is a major dumb-ass because she does not know how too run the cw.she has moved shows to different times messing with people&#039;s rating like smallville. smallvile&#039;s rating would of been differint if she did not move it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Dawn Ostroff is a major dumb-ass because she does not know how too run the cw.she has moved shows to different times messing with people&#8217;s rating like smallville. smallvile&#8217;s rating would of been differint if she did not move it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153323</link>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153323</guid>
		<description>I watch all CW shows but I only really care about my beloved Smallville.
Dawn needs to get fired already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch all CW shows but I only really care about my beloved Smallville.<br />
Dawn needs to get fired already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fire Dawn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153321</link>
		<dc:creator>Fire Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153321</guid>
		<description>In all honesty they need to Fire Dawn O.  I actually don&#039;t hold her strategy against her, I actually think it&#039;s a good strategy in theory.  Her problem though is she has the same show on 4 times a week(out of 8 shows she has on her schedule).

The CW needs to learn to diversify the types of shows they have, while trying to attract a female audience.  They basically should look at shows like One Tree Hill, Gossip Girls, 90210 and Melrose Place and can 2 of the 4, and in there place have some new drama targeted at females but not based around horny rich sluts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honesty they need to Fire Dawn O.  I actually don&#8217;t hold her strategy against her, I actually think it&#8217;s a good strategy in theory.  Her problem though is she has the same show on 4 times a week(out of 8 shows she has on her schedule).</p>
<p>The CW needs to learn to diversify the types of shows they have, while trying to attract a female audience.  They basically should look at shows like One Tree Hill, Gossip Girls, 90210 and Melrose Place and can 2 of the 4, and in there place have some new drama targeted at females but not based around horny rich sluts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleebo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153315</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153315</guid>
		<description>Fridays: I meant to say that they Encores or Imported shows were only shows that came from FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fridays: I meant to say that they Encores or Imported shows were only shows that came from FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleebo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153313</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153313</guid>
		<description>Dillan,

I laughed pretty good at your proposed schedule

Sundays: Smallville, NEW SMALLVILLE SPIN-OFF, NEW SCI FI DRAMA
  - i think it might be a while before they try Sundays on their own original programming again.  They need to just do the &quot;Easy View&quot; route they did a couple years ago with re-airings of some of the shows from the previous week.

Mondays: Gossip Girl, NEW FROTHY TEEN DRAMA
  - BWAHH! I laughed so hard at the title.  In fact I think they should just go ahead and greenlight a pilot for a show and actually just name it &quot;Frothy Teen Drama&quot;  I would watch just for the title appearing on my tv.

Tuesdays: One Tree Hill, NEW SERIOUS ADULT DRAMA
  - Hmmm what 90&#039;s FOX drama can they remake next?  Party of Five?  Boston Public? Ally McBeal?  Screw it...just go ahead with a remake of 24...while the original is still going. Makes just as much sense as some of the other decisions this network(including WB &amp; UPN apart) has made in the past. Remember the pairing of 7th Heaven and Angel at one point in the WB?

Wednesdays: America’s Next Top Model, NEW OTT REALITY SERIES
  - Lets just make this whole night about Tyra Banks. The more crap we give her to do the faster she will have to be committed to the loony bin.  Follow ANTM with an hour long program where Tyra Banks screams about Vaseline.

Thursdays: The Vampire Diaries, Supernatural
  - Don&#039;t like VD but I agree with this pairing. As long as they don&#039;t try to &quot;Twilight&quot; Supernatural along with VD.


Fridays: Encores/Imported Programming
  - Encores for sure...but only encores of shows that lasted one season or less.  Im sure they have enough material to last them until the end of time in that category. Imagine a night packed with Life on a Stick, That 80&#039;s Show, and Murder in Small Town X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dillan,</p>
<p>I laughed pretty good at your proposed schedule</p>
<p>Sundays: Smallville, NEW SMALLVILLE SPIN-OFF, NEW SCI FI DRAMA<br />
  &#8211; i think it might be a while before they try Sundays on their own original programming again.  They need to just do the &#8220;Easy View&#8221; route they did a couple years ago with re-airings of some of the shows from the previous week.</p>
<p>Mondays: Gossip Girl, NEW FROTHY TEEN DRAMA<br />
  &#8211; BWAHH! I laughed so hard at the title.  In fact I think they should just go ahead and greenlight a pilot for a show and actually just name it &#8220;Frothy Teen Drama&#8221;  I would watch just for the title appearing on my tv.</p>
<p>Tuesdays: One Tree Hill, NEW SERIOUS ADULT DRAMA<br />
  &#8211; Hmmm what 90&#8242;s FOX drama can they remake next?  Party of Five?  Boston Public? Ally McBeal?  Screw it&#8230;just go ahead with a remake of 24&#8230;while the original is still going. Makes just as much sense as some of the other decisions this network(including WB &amp; UPN apart) has made in the past. Remember the pairing of 7th Heaven and Angel at one point in the WB?</p>
<p>Wednesdays: America’s Next Top Model, NEW OTT REALITY SERIES<br />
  &#8211; Lets just make this whole night about Tyra Banks. The more crap we give her to do the faster she will have to be committed to the loony bin.  Follow ANTM with an hour long program where Tyra Banks screams about Vaseline.</p>
<p>Thursdays: The Vampire Diaries, Supernatural<br />
  &#8211; Don&#8217;t like VD but I agree with this pairing. As long as they don&#8217;t try to &#8220;Twilight&#8221; Supernatural along with VD.</p>
<p>Fridays: Encores/Imported Programming<br />
  &#8211; Encores for sure&#8230;but only encores of shows that lasted one season or less.  Im sure they have enough material to last them until the end of time in that category. Imagine a night packed with Life on a Stick, That 80&#8242;s Show, and Murder in Small Town X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entertainmenttodayandbeyond</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153308</link>
		<dc:creator>entertainmenttodayandbeyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153308</guid>
		<description>Lets face it its almost stunning that the new Melrose Place can&#039; even get 2 million viewers. People just dont watch the network in general.



chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets face it its almost stunning that the new Melrose Place can&#8217; even get 2 million viewers. People just dont watch the network in general.</p>
<p>chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153291</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153291</guid>
		<description>J.R.,

I don&#039;t care if you think that I&#039;ve made moral judgments about The CW.  I could care less what you think of me, because I don&#039;t know you.

It&#039;s clear you don&#039;t agree with me, which is fine.  End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.R.,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you think that I&#8217;ve made moral judgments about The CW.  I could care less what you think of me, because I don&#8217;t know you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear you don&#8217;t agree with me, which is fine.  End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meli</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153282</link>
		<dc:creator>Meli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153282</guid>
		<description>The problem with CW is that it had the choice of the WB Network&#039;s format or UPN&#039;s format, and it chose the format of UPN. That was obviously the wrong choice in terms of marketing strategy, quality of programming, etc. While there were WB shows that came to CW, few if any of the WB executives came to CW and that hurt them. 

As far as the prediction that all broadcast networks will go cable, well that&#039;s nothing short of Bovine Scatology. No further comment is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with CW is that it had the choice of the WB Network&#8217;s format or UPN&#8217;s format, and it chose the format of UPN. That was obviously the wrong choice in terms of marketing strategy, quality of programming, etc. While there were WB shows that came to CW, few if any of the WB executives came to CW and that hurt them. </p>
<p>As far as the prediction that all broadcast networks will go cable, well that&#8217;s nothing short of Bovine Scatology. No further comment is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Herbaugh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153279</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Herbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153279</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The only thing you’ve proven thus far is that you’re an instigator who has nothing better to do with his time. It’s sad.&lt;/i&gt;

andrew, I&#039;ve proven that you don&#039;t know that you continually make moral judgments. Yes, I have plenty of free time; good for me.  If you think I&#039;m an instigator, why do you continue to fall prey to the instigations?


CW is on the hook to Tribune to provide content for six(?) more years as part of their buyout.   I would not be surprised to see CW turn into a syndication service like MyNet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The only thing you’ve proven thus far is that you’re an instigator who has nothing better to do with his time. It’s sad.</i></p>
<p>andrew, I&#8217;ve proven that you don&#8217;t know that you continually make moral judgments. Yes, I have plenty of free time; good for me.  If you think I&#8217;m an instigator, why do you continue to fall prey to the instigations?</p>
<p>CW is on the hook to Tribune to provide content for six(?) more years as part of their buyout.   I would not be surprised to see CW turn into a syndication service like MyNet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153278</link>
		<dc:creator>Packy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153278</guid>
		<description>As long as the CW survives long enough to give me one more season of Smallville (should it come to pass that they get the green light for a 10th and final season), then I will have no major issues with the CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the CW survives long enough to give me one more season of Smallville (should it come to pass that they get the green light for a 10th and final season), then I will have no major issues with the CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisjozo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153276</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisjozo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153276</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with being a Reaper fan. That was a stupid decision to cancel it then and its still a stupid one now. 

If the CW wants to survive it needs to start targeting a wider audience and put some variety in its programming. Honestly they need to give a youth oriented procedural a try. Warehouse 13 is essentially a procedural and so is White Collar and neither are in the CBS procedural mode. They are interesting and quirky shows but procedurals nonetheless. Procedurals do well and the CW should try and dip its hands in that ratings cookie pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with being a Reaper fan. That was a stupid decision to cancel it then and its still a stupid one now. </p>
<p>If the CW wants to survive it needs to start targeting a wider audience and put some variety in its programming. Honestly they need to give a youth oriented procedural a try. Warehouse 13 is essentially a procedural and so is White Collar and neither are in the CBS procedural mode. They are interesting and quirky shows but procedurals nonetheless. Procedurals do well and the CW should try and dip its hands in that ratings cookie pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAK</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-4/#comment-153273</link>
		<dc:creator>MAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153273</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s an idea:

Get rid of Ostroff, get good shows (not just teen dramas) including comedies (good ones by the way) and no more stupid remakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s an idea:</p>
<p>Get rid of Ostroff, get good shows (not just teen dramas) including comedies (good ones by the way) and no more stupid remakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-3/#comment-153264</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153264</guid>
		<description>The CW needs to bring sports into their schedule. Probably air college sports, since college sports audience is mostly 18-34.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW needs to bring sports into their schedule. Probably air college sports, since college sports audience is mostly 18-34.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-3/#comment-153262</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153262</guid>
		<description>Lucky,

I pretty much watch the same programs you do, too.

I only watch Melrose Place because I loved the original.  Shannen Doherty was the only reason I tuned in to 90210 as well.  While it&#039;s smart for her to to overstay her welcome, I have to admit that I haven&#039;t watched an episode since she was last seen.

Maybe you&#039;re right:  maybe it&#039;s just that the M-Wed. line up is so similar it&#039;s turning people off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky,</p>
<p>I pretty much watch the same programs you do, too.</p>
<p>I only watch Melrose Place because I loved the original.  Shannen Doherty was the only reason I tuned in to 90210 as well.  While it&#8217;s smart for her to to overstay her welcome, I have to admit that I haven&#8217;t watched an episode since she was last seen.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re right:  maybe it&#8217;s just that the M-Wed. line up is so similar it&#8217;s turning people off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/05/tv-pundit-the-cw-is-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff/32704/comment-page-3/#comment-153257</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=32704#comment-153257</guid>
		<description>Actually thanks to a higher-than-usual VD and lower-than usual GG, VD has a slim advantage in W 18-34 for the season now. I&#039;m guessing GG will remain the #2 at the end of the season though. GG had a few 3-point-something eps, but VD seems to overall be more consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually thanks to a higher-than-usual VD and lower-than usual GG, VD has a slim advantage in W 18-34 for the season now. I&#8217;m guessing GG will remain the #2 at the end of the season though. GG had a few 3-point-something eps, but VD seems to overall be more consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

